|
|
|
|
|
| Study of Ontology-Based Swine Diagnosis Technology |
| CUI Yun-peng, SU Xiao-lu, LIU Shi-hong |
| Key Laboratory of Agri-Information Service Technology, Ministry of Agriculture/Agriculture Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 The computer swine disease diagnosis is an important tool for swine farming industry, but the traditional expert system cannot meet the requirement of practical application. To improve the situation, a swine disease ontology is constructed, which can model the knowledge of swine disease diagnosis into a concept system, and a mechanism that can save the ontology into relational database is established, further more a computer system is developed to implement ontologybased swine disease diagnosis, so make the diagnosis results extended and more precise.
Abstract The computer swine disease diagnosis is an important tool for swine farming industry, but the traditional expert system cannot meet the requirement of practical application. To improve the situation, a swine disease ontology is constructed, which can model the knowledge of swine disease diagnosis into a concept system, and a mechanism that can save the ontology into relational database is established, further more a computer system is developed to implement ontologybased swine disease diagnosis, so make the diagnosis results extended and more precise.
|
|
Received: 08 October 2011
Accepted:
|
| Fund: The research was supported by the Special Project, Ministry of Agriculture, China (2012-J-01). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence CUI Yun-peng, Tel: +86-10-82106265, Fax: +86-10-82109655, E-mail: cyunpeng@163.com
E-mail: cyunpeng@163.com
|
| About author: CUI Yun-peng, Tel: +86-10-82106265, Fax: +86-10-82109655, E-mail: cyunpeng@163.com |
Cite this article:
CUI Yun-peng, SU Xiao-lu, LIU Shi-hong.
2012.
Study of Ontology-Based Swine Diagnosis Technology. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11(5): 831-838.
|
| [1]Allemang D, Hendler J. 2008. Chapter 6-RDF Schema, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco. pp. 91-122. [2]Cai S. 1994. China Agricultural Encyclopedia. Agricultural engineering volume. Beijing Agriculture Press, China. pp. 583-584. (in Chinese) [3]Corcho O, Fernández-López M, Gómez-Pérez A. 2003. Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. where is their meeting point? Data Knowledge Engineering, 1, 41-64. [4]Fensel D, Rousset M, Decker S. 1998. Workshop on comparing description and frame logics. Data Knowledge Engineering, 3, 347-352. [5]Gallupe B. 2001. Knowledge management systems: surveying the landscape. International Journal of Management Review, 3, 61-77. [6]Hendler J. 2002. OWL: A web ontology language. In: Proceedings of the 11th Internation World Wide Web Conference. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. Horrocks I, Glimm B, Sattler U. 2007. Hybrid logics and ontology languages. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 6, 3-14. [7]Jesús M, Almendros J. 2008. An RDF query language based on logic programming. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 3, 67-85. [8]Kivel A, HyvÈnen E. 2002. Ontological theories for the semantic web. In: HyvÈnen E, ed., Semantic Web Kick-Off in Finland: Vision, Technologies, Research, and Application. HIIT Publications, Helsinki. pp. 111-136. [9]Li D, Fu Z, Duan Y. 2002. Fish-expert: a web-based expert system for fish disease diagnosis. Expert Systems with Applications, 23, 311-320. [10]Liu K, Lily S, Yan F. 2008. Ontological modeling of content management and provision. Information and Software Technology, 11, 1155-1164. [11]McCarthy J. 1980. Circumscription-A form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13, 27-39. [12]Meng X X, Li J, Su X L, Hu H Y, Wang Y Q. 2012. Largescale ontology development and agricultural application based on knowledge domain framework. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11, 808-822. [13]Mengshoel O. 1995. A reformulation technique and tool for knowledge interchange during knowledge acquisition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2, 177-212. [14]Newman D, Baldwin T, Cavedon L, Huang E, Karimi S, Martinez D, Scholer F, Zobel J. 2010. Visualizing search results and document collections using topic maps. In: Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2-3, 169-175. [15]Patel-Schneider P, Hayes P, Horrocks I. 2003. OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract sysntax. In: W3C Working Draft. W3C. Pulido J, Ruiz M, Herrera R, Cabello E, Legrand S, Elliman D. 2006. Ontology languages for the semantic web: a never completely updated review. Knowledge-Based Systems, 7, 489-497. [16]Simperl E. 2009. Reusing ontologies on the semantic web: a feasibility study. Data Knowledge Engineering, 10, 905-925. [17]Sowa J. 1984. Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine reading. MSc thesis, Addison Wesley, USA. [18]Wang H, Wu J, Jiang F. 2004. Ontology based metadata model and DAML description. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2, 131-136. (in Chinese) [19]Xu F. 2005. An expert system for pig diseases diagnosis. MSc thesis, China Agriculture University. (in Chinese) [20]Zhou X, Cao C. 2003. Ontology based medical knowledge acquisition. Computer Science, 10, 35-39. (in Chinese) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
