Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (18): 3973-3988.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.18.002

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Effect of the Tuber-Specific Protein StSP6A on in vitro Potato Tuber Formation Under High-Temperature Stress

DING Ning1(), LI QingQuan2, XU Jing2, VLADIMIR N. Obraztsov3, JIA XiaoXia1, HUANG Wei1, QI EnFang1()   

  1. 1 Potato Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Gansu Engineering Laboratory of Potato Germplasm Resources Innovation, Lanzhou 730070, China
    2 Agronomy College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    3 Voronezh State Agrarian University, Voronezh region 394087, Russia
  • Received:2026-05-31 Accepted:2026-07-22 Online:2026-09-16 Published:2026-09-20
  • Contact: QI EnFang

Abstract:

【Objective】High temperatures, as a major abiotic stress factor, affect potato tuber formation. Exploring the mechanisms underlying potato tuber formation under high-temperature stress holds significant theoretical value for elucidating the intrinsic mechanisms by which environmental factors regulate tuber development.【Method】Using in vitro seedlings from 103 potato germplasm accessions as experimental material, the seedlings were subjected to either optimal temperature (17 ℃) or high temperature (28 ℃) in plant growth chamber for 150 days. After collecting and analyzing the phenotypic traits of the seedlings, representative germplasm accessions were selected for transcriptomic analysis, which was validated using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Furthermore, following the construction of an SP6A overexpression vector, genetic transformation was performed using Longshu 10. After subjecting the transgenic material to high-temperature treatment, phenotypic evaluation and molecular-level analysis were conducted.【Result】After treatment at 17 ℃ and 28 ℃, 103 accessions were classified into four temperature response patterns: widespread tuber-forming type (GroupⅠ, 46 accessions; tubers formed at both temperatures), heat-sensitive type (GroupⅡ, 33 accessions; tubers formed only at 17 ℃), high temperatures /high sugar induced sensitive type (GroupⅢ, 11 accessions; tubers formed only at 28 ℃), and non-tuber-forming (GroupⅣ, 13 accessions; no tubers formed at either temperature). Furthermore, a variance analysis indicated that high-temperature stress shortened the number of days to tuber formation, reduced plant height, and significantly decreased the weight and number of test-tube tubers. At the same time, the coefficients of variation for those indicators all increased significantly. Transcriptome analysis revealed that Longshu 11 (which tuberizes only at 17 ℃) and Lily (which tuberizes only at 28 ℃) had 3 398 and 2 197 differentially expressed genes, respectively. with the differentially expressed genes in Longshu 11 focused on molecular functions such as catalytic activity, as well as metabolic processes and pathways, while those in Lily were enriched in cell wall remodeling and carbohydrate metabolism pathways. A combined transcriptomic analysis revealed that the two groups shared 730 differentially expressed genes, which were classified into eight categories based on their expression patterns. Among the 14 key differentially expressed genes, the tuber-specific gene SP6A is the primary factor responsible for the differences in tuber formation in in vitro tubers under high-temperature stress. An increased number of microtubers was observed in the overexpression plants (SP6A-OE) under 17 ℃ treatment. Under 28 ℃ heat treatment, although the formation of in vitro tubers was inhibited in both the SP6A-OE and control, the SP6A-OE line still produced more in vitro tubers. Western blot results indicated that the expression level of the SP6A protein in SP6A-OE plants was lower at 28 ℃ than at 17 ℃. Meanwhile, RT-qPCR results showed that SP6A expression was suppressed at high temperatures, whereas the expression levels of both SP5G and HSFA6b were significantly elevated at 28 ℃.【Conclusion】Under high-temperature stress, different potato germplasm exhibit varying tuber-forming habits. Overexpression of StSP6A alleviates the inhibitory effect caused by heat stress on axillary tuber formation, thereby enhancing the ability of in-vitro seedlings to form tubers under high-temperature conditions.

Key words: potato, high temperature stress, SELF-PRUNING 6A (StSP6A), genetic modification, in vitro tubers

Table 1

List of primers"

引物Primer 正向引物Forward primer (5′-3′) 反向引物Reverse primer (5′-3′)
StSP6A-pART-CAM-FLAG-GFP TCATTTGGAGAGGACACGCATGCCTAGA
GTTGATCCATTGATAGTTGGTCG
TCGTCATCCTTGTAGTCGAATGCGCGAC
GTCCTCCAGT
CDI AGATTCATTCCTTTATCTGGAGGT TCCCGTCTCCAACAACATCG
SBT5.6 GCACCTGTCATGGCACATTTT CGCTCCACGCTGCTAGTATG
NFD4 TCAAGGTTCCGGCTTCCTTC TCCTCCCCAATCATTTTCCCA
HSP22.7 TCTGCCGCTTTCTATTGCGA TCCGGCAAACGAAACTGTCT
HSFA6b GGAACAGAGAGGAAGCAGCA GGAATCCGTTAGCCTCTCCG
SP6A CCCAAGCGACCCTAACTTGA CCAACCTGGGGCATACACTG
PYL4 AATCACTACAGCGCCACACA CTACGTTACCGTCTCCGTCG
LEA GCTAGACCACATCAACGTGC TCGCGATACCAATCGTGACA
MAP3Ka TGGATGGCTCCAGAGGTAGT GCTGAACAGCTGTCAAACGG
SP5G GGTGTGTAGACTTTGGTGTGGTTT GGCCTCAAGGCACATCCAT
EF1a GATGAAATCGTGAAGGAAGTTTCTTC CAGTCAAGGTTGGTAGACCT

Table 2

Phenotypic characteristics of 103 potato germplasms under high-temperature stress"

品种名称
Variety name
品种编号
Serial
结薯天数
Days to tuber formation (d)
株高
Plant height (cm)
块茎鲜重
Weight (g)
试管薯数目
No. of tubers per plant
17 28 17 28 17 28 17 28
S. demissum S1 42.11 70.85 6.05 3.60 1.17 0.29 1.33 2.00
Сюрприз S2 48.24 61.58 13.73 8.10 2.43 2.36 3.33 1.67
Лад S3 50.58 97.57 4.80 9.73 0.07 0.73 0.33 1.00
云薯701 Yunshu 701 S4 45.42 87.52 9.87 5.60 3.58 0.64 3.00 1.00
冀张薯12号Jizhangshu 12 S5 115.23 98.25 13.45 12.12 4.00 3.36 2.00 2.67
大西洋Atlantic S6 42.24 45.62 13.20 10.32 2.28 1.62 3.33 1.33
费乌瑞它Favorita S7 76.08 133.95 15.67 11.73 1.76 0.79 3.00 1.00
东农310 Dongnong 310 S8 91.24 133.43 12.47 5.10 5.13 1.33 2.67 0.33
Десятка S9 107.86 133.52 16.17 7.30 2.11 0.27 3.00 0.67
天薯14号Tianshu 14 S10 42.48 70.11 12.80 7.27 1.31 0.79 2.67 0.67
S.stenotomum S11 87.54 76.51 12.05 10.42 1.38 1.77 3.00 2.33
Мастак S12 104.46 45.57 14.48 6.28 8.26 1.05 3.33 2.67
Волат S13 61.13 45.10 8.35 10.87 1.48 3.48 1.67 1.67
Лель S14 83.27 42.52 7.83 12.57 2.20 2.17 2.67 4.00
Бриз S15 42.58 42.78 9.90 7.60 2.10 3.65 3.33 2.33
Вилия S16 45.75 42.62 6.30 10.35 2.80 1.76 2.67 1.67
Фальварак S17 61.24 42.24 8.47 10.40 2.99 1.84 3.33 1.00
陇薯10号Longshu 10 S18 87.33 50.11 9.60 14.53 3.08 2.84 2.67 3.00
Палац S19 87.31 48.82 9.37 11.53 1.27 0.94 1.33 0.33
Jenь S20 87.43 52.23 13.57 9.47 1.34 1.32 2.33 1.67
Уладар S21 52.00 45.75 6.17 10.37 3.02 2.00 3.00 3.00
Максимум S22 70.45 45.21 9.70 11.57 2.59 4.26 2.33 2.67
Гарантия S23 45.23 45.50 8.43 10.13 2.54 1.77 3.00 2.00
Водар S24 61.12 50.85 13.20 13.60 3.62 5.24 2.67 3.00
中薯7号Zhongshu 7 S25 70.24 45.12 11.50 8.80 2.05 0.53 2.00 0.33
云薯103 Yunshu 103 S26 87.85 45.24 11.63 8.60 0.60 1.41 1.67 1.33
云薯901 Yunshu 901 S27 70.28 42.12 14.08 8.57 1.97 1.22 0.67 2.00
云薯505 Yunshu 505 S28 87.33 45.24 10.73 12.80 4.03 0.83 2.33 1.33
云薯104 Yunshu 104 S29 76.45 45.45 12.50 9.30 1.45 1.97 0.33 0.33
云薯601 Yunshu 601 S30 87.87 52.42 10.60 8.03 0.67 1.18 2.33 1.33
甘农薯7号Gannongshu 7 S31 87.52 50.20 10.97 8.50 3.22 2.96 1.33 2.00
甘农薯9号Gannongshu 9 S32 70.47 45.30 10.80 9.83 3.21 4.98 2.00 1.33
红美Hongmei S33 87.86 42.12 13.27 11.27 3.06 3.70 2.67 2.00
维拉斯Velas S34 91.59 45.25 15.20 11.10 1.13 2.03 2.00 1.33
青薯7号Qingshu7 S35 91.42 42.11 14.07 8.75 2.74 1.99 2.67 0.67
京张薯1号Jingzhangshu 1 S36 97.27 57.57 14.28 9.07 1.67 4.80 2.33 2.00
陇薯4号Longshu 4 S37 70.21 42.85 14.03 13.13 3.88 3.12 3.33 0.67
陇薯12号Longshu 12 S38 76.35 76.82 12.83 8.73 2.91 0.40 2.00 0.67
陇薯14号Longshu 14 S39 70.24 50.41 11.10 10.20 3.79 2.73 2.00 2.67
陇薯17号Longshu 17 S40 70.01 42.57 9.60 6.05 1.04 0.71 1.33 0.67
陇薯19号Longshu 19 S41 87.25 42.89 13.07 6.93 4.24 0.15 2.67 0.67
陇薯23号Longshu 23 S42 83.36 45.12 17.55 7.50 0.62 0.19 2.67 0.33
中薯3号Zhongshu 3 S43 70.24 42.35 10.20 10.03 1.71 1.16 3.33 0.67
天薯10号Tianshu 10 S44 133.04 70.15 13.33 8.51 1.54 2.03 3.67 1.67
新大坪Xindaping S45 87.85 50.54 12.13 11.52 2.59 4.77 3.33 2.33
底西芮Desiree S46 83.12 44.74 8.40 15.03 3.42 0.19 3.67 0.33
陇薯3号Longshu 3 A1 133.58 - 8.75 8.95 0.45 - 0.45 -
陇薯6号Longshu 6 A2 104.48 - 11.63 9.63 2.77 - 1.67 -
陇薯11号Longshu 11 A3 52.59 - 14.81 9.81 4.56 - 3.33 -
陇薯18号Longshu 18 A4 98.62 - 14.10 9.67 1.07 - 0.33 -
陇薯20号Longshu 20 A5 87.51 - 8.60 7.19 0.76 - 1.33 -
天薯11号Tianshu 11 A6 70.63 - 8.20 6.90 2.31 - 2.00 -
天薯12号Tianshu 12 A7 91.44 - 7.53 6.07 2.81 - 3.00 -
天薯17号Tianshu 17 A8 45.54 - 11.37 6.35 2.50 - 2.33 -
S.pinnatisecta A9 45.85 - 15.85 13.95 0.07 - 0.67 -
Красавик A10 76.24 - 8.73 15.87 3.03 - 2.67 -
云薯102 Yunshu102 A11 42.55 - 17.13 9.50 2.96 - 3.67 -
云薯801 Yunshu801 A12 91.47 - 12.10 8.74 2.37 - 3.00 -
冀张薯3号Jizhangshu 3 A13 42.59 - 10.20 9.14 2.67 - 3.00 -
冀张薯14号Jizhangshu 14 A14 133.25 - 13.01 5.82 0.76 - 1.33 -
黑金刚Heimeiren A15 115.28 - 4.70 1.37 0.17 - 2.00 -
天薯19号Tianshu 19 A16 50.89 - 11.10 1.47 0.36 - 1.00 -
青薯2号Qingshu 2 A17 70.52 - 10.60 7.35 2.43 - 1.67 -
青薯9号Qingshu 9 A18 45.63 - 14.77 8.81 1.82 - 2.67 -
陇薯25号Longshu 25 A19 45.41 - 16.20 10.23 1.43 - 2.33 -
陇薯29号Longshu 29 A20 42.05 - 9.40 5.82 3.12 - 3.33 -
露辛达v7 A21 133.82 - 12.07 9.82 1.68 - 1.00 -
S.microdonatum A22 115.00 - 11.08 15.75 0.21 - 0.33 -
早大白Zaodabai A23 87.28 - 12.07 9.58 2.44 - 3.33 -
陇薯27号Longshu 27 A24 87.24 - 12.63 8.99 3.90 - 3.00 -
甘农薯2号Gannongshu 2 A25 61.85 - 13.84 12.69 2.97 - 2.33 -
希森6号Xisen 6 A26 52.95 - 7.06 6.12 5.38 - 3.00 -
青薯168 Qingshu 168 A27 45.20 - 16.77 13.95 5.83 - 2.67 -
陇薯5号Longshu 5 A28 133.25 - 13.47 8.43 1.40 - 2.33 -
陇薯7号Longshu 7 A29 70.65 - 11.90 10.80 5.91 - 3.00 -
陇薯15号Longshu 15 A30 87.74 - 12.13 8.73 1.64 - 2.33 -
陇薯16号Longshu 16 A31 50.72 - 12.53 9.63 2.79 - 1.67 -
陇薯28号Longshu 28 A32 87.58 - 12.80 6.71 3.17 - 3.67 -
陇薯紫2号Longshuzi 2 A33 70.62 - 7.40 12.30 1.53 - 3.33 -
庄薯3号Zhuangshu 3 B1 - 52.87 15.33 5.83 - 1.33 - 1.33
S.stoloniferum B2 - 42.22 13.86 14.30 - 1.85 - 2.00
丽薯1号Lishu 1 B3 - 83.10 14.70 7.67 - 1.36 - 1.00
Фиолетовый B4 - 83.45 13.24 5.17 - 2.28 - 1.00
云薯304 Yunshu304 B5 - 45.01 12.30 9.92 - 0.05 - 0.33
甘农薯4号Gannongshu 4 B6 - 70.56 11.03 11.80 - 0.85 - 1.00
闵薯1号Minshu 1 B7 - 91.45 13.90 7.87 - 3.24 - 3.33
青薯6号Qingshu 6 B8 - 42.05 11.30 6.18 - 2.08 - 1.33
青薯10号Qingshu 10 B9 - 42.48 7.57 5.65 - 2.07 - 0.67
Белы B10 - 104.15 8.92 7.78 - 0.52 - 0.67
Лилея B11 - 85.68 13.89 6.86 - 2.11 - 1.00
陇薯9号Longshu 10 C1 - - 13.76 8.12 - - - -
天薯9号Tianshu 9 C2 - - 2.69 6.53 - - - -
中薯5号Zhongshu 5 C3 - - 12.57 8.25 - - - -
夏波帝Shepody C4 - - 14.13 6.98 - - - -
合作88 Cooperation-88 C5 - - 12.37 7.67 - - - -
S.chacoense C6 - - 9.12 14.47 - - - -
陇薯21号Longshu 21 C7 - - 12.17 7.39 - - - -
Здабытак C8 - - 8.60 11.89 - - - -
云薯902 Yunshu 902 C9 - - 5.50 6.82 - - - -
陇薯红1号Longshuhong 1 C10 - - 13.56 10.81 - - - -
天薯15号Tianshu 15 C11 - - 11.73 7.47 - - - -
克新6号Kexin 6 C12 - - 16.57 13.89 - - - -
陇薯紫1号Longshuzi 1 C13 - - 10.79 5.46 - - - -

Table 3

Analysis of variation in 46 potato tuber-related traits"

指标
Index
处理
Treatments
最大值
Maximum
最小值
Minimum
极差
Range
平均值
Mean
标准差
Standard deviation
变异系数
Coefficient of variation (%)
结薯天数
Days to tuber formation (d)
17 ℃ 133.04 42.11 90.93 75.57 20.90 27.65
28 ℃ 133.95 42.11 91.84 58.15 23.01 39.58
株高
Plant height (cm)
17 ℃ 17.55 4.80 12.75 11.47 2.85 24.85
28 ℃ 15.03 3.60 11.43 9.63 2.44 25.34
块茎鲜重
Weight (g)
17 ℃ 8.26 0.07 8.19 2.48 1.42 57.23
28 ℃ 5.24 0.15 5.09 1.94 1.40 72.31
试管薯数目
No. of tubers per plant
17 ℃ 3.67 0.33 3.34 2.44 0.83 34.07
28 ℃ 4.00 0.33 3.67 1.53 0.91 59.34

Fig. 1

Correlation analysis of potato tuber formation traits under different temperatures A: 17 ℃; B: 28 ℃. Red indicates a positive correlation, and blue indicates a negative correlation"

Fig. 2

Analysis of RNA-seq from Longshu 11 and Lily under high-temperature stress A: Tuber formation in Longshu 11 and Lily under two temperature conditions; B: Principal component analysis of the samples; C: Correlation heatmap of the samples; D: Analysis of differentially expressed genes; E and F show the top 20 GO term lists for Longshu 11 and Lily, respectively; Green represents cellular components, blue represents biological processes, and yellow represents molecular functions"

Fig. 3

Integrated transcriptome analysis of Longshu 11 and Lily A: Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes between Longshu 11 and Lily; B: Heatmap of 730 shared differentially expressed genes; C: Box plots showing the distribution of gene expression levels across the 4 clusters. The black lines represent the mean expression levels"

Table 4

Table for candidate genes"

基因ID
Gene ID
基因
Gene
陇薯11号中表达量
Longshu 11 FPKM
Lily中表达量
Lily FPKM
描述
Description
DM8C02G15320 SBT5.6 5.85 -9.37 假想蛋白Hypothetical protein
DM8C03G24430 CDI 9.61 -7.20 假想蛋白Hypothetical protein
DM8C03G24450 CDI 9.61 -7.20 假想蛋白Hypothetical protein
DM8C08G19980 NFD4 9.32 -10.28 核融合缺陷蛋白Nuclear fusion defective 4-like protein
DM8C11G12130 HSP22.7 5.64 -14.18 小分子热激蛋白Heat shock protein
MSTRG.26382 TAP 5.14 -13.43 转运衔接蛋白TAP1-like protein
DM8C01G29290 PECS-2.1 -5.76 5.02 果胶酯酶Pectinesterase 2
DM8C10G19610 PYL4 -6.40 4.42 脱落酸受体Abscisic acid receptor PYL4-like
DM8C08G28600 LEA -8.06 4.43 晚期胚胎富集蛋白Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) hydroxyproline-rich
DM8C04G26070 MtN21 -12.91 4.39 细胞壁合成相关蛋白WAT1-related protein
DM8C05G26810 SP6A -11.01 3.46 开花因子Flowering locus T protein
DM8C09G20490 HSFA6b -10.50 3.85 热激转录因子Heat stress transcription factor
DM8C09G20500 HSFA6b -9.46 3.30 热激转录因子Heat stress transcription factor A-7a-like isoform X2
DM8C04G24740 MAP3Ka -4.02 11.27 丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激酶激酶3
Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 3

Fig. 4

Validation by RT-qPCR **: P<0.01, and ***: P<0.001. The same as below"

Fig. 5

The effect of overexpression SP6A on tuber formation in vitro under high-temperature stress A: Phenotypic of SP6A-OE plants treated under two temperature conditions; B: Western blot; C: Detection of SP6A, SP5G, and HSFA6b expression levels"

[1]
Levy D, Veilleux R E. Adaptation of potato to high temperatures and salinity-a review[J]. American Journal of Potato Research, 2007, 84(6): 487-506.

doi: 10.1007/BF02987885
[2]
Hijmans R J. The effect of climate change on global potato production[J]. American Journal of Potato Research, 2003, 80(4): 271-279.

doi: 10.1007/BF02855363
[3]
Dahal K, Li X Q, Tai H, Creelman A, Bizimungu B. Improving potato stress tolerance and Tuber yield under a climate change scenario - a current overview[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 563.

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00563
[4]
Fang G N, Yang S W, Ruan B P, Ye G J, He M M, Su W, Zhou Y, Wang J, Yang S L. Research progress on physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of potato in response to drought and high temperature[J]. Horticulturae, 2024, 10(8): 827.

doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10080827
[5]
Lal M K, Tiwari R K, Kumar A, Dey A, Kumar R, Kumar D, Jaiswal A, Changan S S, Raigond P, Dutt S, Luthra S K, Mandal S, Singh M P, Paul V, Singh B. Mechanistic concept of physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of the potato crop to heat and drought stress[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(21): 2857.

doi: 10.3390/plants11212857
[6]
Alhaj Hamoud Y, Noman M, Yang X, Ahmed T, Alwutayd K M, Qin H J, Shaghaleh H. Integrated multi-omics and transcriptomic analysis reveals key regulatory networks of heat stress responses in potato[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2025, 228: 110204.

doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110204
[7]
Abelenda J A, Bergonzi S, Oortwijn M, Sonnewald S, Du M R, Visser R G F, Sonnewald U, Bachem C W B. Source-sink regulation is mediated by interaction of an FT homolog with a SWEET protein in potato[J]. Current Biology, 2019, 29(7): 1178-1186.

doi: S0960-9822(19)30157-5 pmid: 30905604
[8]
Yeo D S G, Eydam J, Koch L, Lackus N D, Reinert S, Kauder F, Bruckmüller J, Lübeck J, Sonnewald S, Sonnewald U. SELF- PRUNING 6A promotes tuberization and heat tolerance but lowers immunity of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2025, 76(22): 6881-6895.

doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraf393
[9]
Qin R H, Yi R, Feng J J, Liang J Y, Bai J H, Jia L G. StSP6A: A key regulator integrating multiple signals for potato Tuber formation[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2026, 45(4): 85.

doi: 10.1007/s00299-026-03772-2
[10]
Zhang R L, Du W B, He Q, Li D Q, Luo B T, Cao L Y, Wang X Y, Zeng Z X, Wu J, Chen C. Overexpression of StHsfA2 enhances thermotolerance and promotes tuberisation in potato under high temperature through StSP6A[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2025, 23(11): 5045-5062.

doi: 10.1111/pbi.v23.11
[11]
Lehretz G G, Sonnewald S, Sonnewald U. Assimilate highway to sink organs-Physiological consequences of SP6A overexpression in transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2021, 266: 153530.

doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153530
[12]
Koch L, Lehretz G G, Sonnewald U, Sonnewald S. Yield reduction caused by elevated temperatures and high nitrogen fertilization is mitigated by SP6A overexpression in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)[J]. The Plant Journal, 2024, 117(6): 1702-1715.

doi: 10.1111/tpj.v117.6
[13]
Vishal, Mali S, Dutta M, Choudhary A, Zinta G. Potato microtuberization: Its regulation and applications[J]. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2025, 45(7): 1454-1477.

doi: 10.1080/07388551.2025.2490957
[14]
Zhang Z J, Zhou W J, Li H Z. The role of GA, IAA and BAP in the regulation of in vitro shoot growth and microtuberization in potato[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2005, 27(3): 363-369.

doi: 10.1007/s11738-005-0013-7
[15]
丁宁, 齐恩芳, 贾小霞, 黄伟, 马丽荣, 李建武, 燕汝楠. 马铃薯幼苗应答高温胁迫的miRNA筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(22): 4589-4602. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.22.003.
Ding N, Qi E F, Jia X X, Huang W, Ma L R, Li J W, Yan R N. Screening and identification of miRNAs in potato seedlings in response to high temperature stress[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4589-4602. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.22.003. (in Chinese)
[16]
Rueden C T, Schindelin J, Hiner M C, DeZonia B E, Walter A E, Arena E T, Eliceiri K W. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2017, 18(1): 529.

doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z pmid: 29187165
[17]
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT[EB/OL]. [2026-05-31]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.Accessed27April2026. Accessed 27 April 2026.
[18]
Levy D, Kastenbaum E, Itzhak Y. Evaluation of parents and selection for heat tolerance in the early generations of a potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) breeding program[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1991, 82(2): 130-136.

doi: 10.1007/BF00226203 pmid: 24213056
[19]
刘菊, 李广存, 段绍光, 胡军, 简银巧, 刘建刚, 金黎平, 徐建飞. 不同夜间温度处理对马铃薯试管薯及块茎形成相关基因表达的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(3): 92-98.
Liu J, Li G C, Duan S G, Hu J, Jian Y Q, Liu J G, Jin L P, Xu J F. The effects of different night temperature treatments on in vitro tuberization and related-genes expression in potato[J]. Crops, 2022(3): 92-98. (in Chinese)
[20]
Zhang S J, Ye H, Kong L S, Li X Y, Chen Y Q, Wang S P, Liu B L. Multivariate analysis compares and evaluates heat tolerance of potato germplasm[J]. Plants, 2024, 13(1): 142.

doi: 10.3390/plants13010142
[21]
单建伟, 柳俊, 索海翠, 王丽, 安康, 刘计涛, 景晟林, 李成晨, 宋波涛, 李小波. 糖信号调控马铃薯块茎发育的研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(4): 27-35.
Shan J W, Liu J, Suo H C, Wang L, An K, Liu J T, Jing S L, Li C C, Song B T, Li X B. Progress on sugar signal regulating potato Tuber development[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2021, 40(4): 27-35. (in Chinese)
[22]
Navarro C, Abelenda J A, Cruz-Oró E, Cuéllar C A, Tamaki S, Silva J, Shimamoto K, Prat S. Control of flowering and storage organ formation in potato by FLOWERING LOCUS T[J]. Nature, 2011, 478(7367): 119-122.

doi: 10.1038/nature10431
[23]
Liu Y Y, Yang K Z, Wei X X, Wang X Q. Revisiting the phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (PEBP) gene family reveals cryptic FLOWERING LOCUS T gene homologs in gymnosperms and sheds new light on functional evolution[J]. New Phytologist, 2016, 212(3): 730-744.

doi: 10.1111/nph.14066 pmid: 27375201
[24]
Jacob P, Hirt H, Bendahmane A. The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15(4): 405-414.

doi: 10.1111/pbi.12659 pmid: 27860233
[25]
Teo C J, Takahashi K, Shimizu K, Shimamoto K, Taoka K I. Potato Tuber induction is regulated by interactions between components of a tuberigen complex[J]. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2017, 58(2): 365-374.
[26]
Liu T F, Dong L P, Wang E S, Liu S X, Cheng Y X, Zhao J, Xu S J, Liang Z, Ma H, Nie B H, Song B T. StHAB1, a negative regulatory factor in abscisic acid signaling, plays crucial roles in potato drought tolerance and shoot branching[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2023, 74(21): 6708-6721.

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad292 pmid: 37479226
[27]
Wang E S, Jing S L, Dong L P, Sun X M, Liu T F, Liu S X, Qin J, He S J, He S S, Jiang P, Ye X T, Cai X K, Song B T. StHAB1-mediated ABA signaling potentiates the sensitivity to long-distance signal StSP6 A to promote tuberization in potato[J]. New Phytologist, 2026, 250(2): 1058-1074.

doi: 10.1111/nph.v250.2
[1] HOU HuiZhi, YIN JiaDe, MA MingSheng, LIU XiaoWei, LIU YanLan, LEI KangNing. Effects of Tillage and Organic Fertilizer Application on Crop Yield and Water Use in a Potato-Maize Double Cropping System in the Longdong Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(8): 1672-1685.
[2] LI ShaoXing, SONG WenFeng, WEI ZeYu, ZHOU YuLing, SONG LiXia, REN Ke, MA Qun, WANG LongChang. Effects of Straw and Milk Vetch Mulching on Soil Fertility and Sweet Potato Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1591-1603.
[3] MENG Hui, LUO BingYu, LU ZhengYu, WANG Peng, KANG DongRu, ZHENG ChengShu, WANG WenLi. Cloning of CmASMT and Its Role in Thermotolerance of Chrysanthemum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1617-1626.
[4] TANG Yu, LEI BiXin, WANG ChuanWei, YAN XuanTao, WANG Hao, ZHENG Jie, ZHANG WenJing, MA ShangYu, HUANG ZhengLai, FAN YongHui. Response Mechanism of Anthocyanin Accumulation in Colored Wheat to Post-Anthesis High Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1083-1101.
[5] SU Ming, LI FanGuo, HONG ZiQiang, ZHOU Tian, LIU QiangJuan, BAN WenHui, WU HongLiang, KANG JianHong. Antioxidant Characterization of Nitrogen Application for Mitigating Potato Senescence Post-Flowering Under High Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 660-675.
[6] ZHENG Yu, CHEN Yi, TI JinSong, SHI LongFei, XU XiaoBo, LI YuLin, GUO Rui. Evaluation of Carbon Footprint and Economic Benefit of Different Tobacco Rotation Patterns [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 733-747.
[7] MA HeXiao, GE GuoLong, ZHANG XiangQian, LU ZhanYuan, WANG ManXiu, RONG MeiRen, SHI JingJing, ZHANG DeJian, SUN XuePing. Effects of Different Crop Rotation Systems on Soil Readily Oxidized Organic Carbon and Carbon Pool Activity Differences [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5201-5215.
[8] DING Ning, QI EnFang, JIA XiaoXia, HUANG Wei, MA LiRong, LI JianWu, YAN RuNan. Screening and Identification of miRNAs in Potato Seedlings in Response to High Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4589-4602.
[9] DU TaiFeng, ZHOU YuanYuan, QIN Zhen, LI AiXian, WANG QingMei, ZHANG LiMing, HOU FuYun. Exogenous Brassinolide Alleviates the Inhibitory Effect of SPVD on Sweet Potato Storage Roots Germination [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4628-4637.
[10] CHEN YongXian, CHEN RuiJiang, DU YiZhi, ZHU JunJie, CHEN WanXia, ZHAO ZiHan, WANG JiChun, DU Kang, ZHANG Kai. Screening and Identification of Drought-Tolerant Sweet Potato Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 214-237.
[11] LEI BiXin, YU YongBo, ZHANG MingTong, CUI GuoJi, HONG JiaWen, HU Tao, YOU AiXin, ZHANG WenJing, MA ShangYu, HUANG ZhengLai, FAN YongHui. Impact of Post-Anthesis Heat Stress on Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield Components in Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(19): 3837-3856.
[12] ZHAO DongLan, MA JuKui, XIAO ShiZhuo, ZHOU ZhiLin, ZHAO LingXiao, WANG Jie, DAI XiBin, SUN HouJun, CAO QingHe. QTL Analysis for Resistance to Stem Nematode Disease in Sweetpotato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(17): 3389-3399.
[13] XIE HuiHui, YANG QiuHua, LI WenLi, ZHU JinCheng, LI HuiXia, ZHANG Feng. Identification of Wild Potato Introgression Lines Resistant to Southern Root-Knot Nematode [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(14): 2924-2932.
[14] ZHAO TianTian, YUAN JianLong, ZHUO FengQi, TANG ZhenSan, XU Jie, ZHANG Feng. Comprehensive Evaluation of Potato Flour Quality and Variety Screening [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(13): 2522-2537.
[15] LI YongFei, LI ZhanKui, ZHANG ZhanSheng, CHEN YongWei, KANG JianHong, WU HongLiang. Effects of Postponing Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Flag Leaf Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Spring Wheat Under High Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(8): 1455-1468.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!