Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 191-202.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.01.018

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles    

Advances in Ecological Theories and Management Models Regarding Rangeland Management

LI XiangLin   

  1. Institute of Animal Sciences of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2017-07-12 Online:2018-01-01 Published:2018-01-01

Abstract: The introduction of Clementsian succession theory in early twentieth century represented a substantial advance in rangeland ecology. Succession theory as a central concept of equilibrium ecology had profound influence on development of rangeland science and natural resource management models. However, equilibrium ecology and the steady-state management model received severe criticism in 1970s and 1980s. On one hand, nonlinear vegetation dynamics was recognized in rangeland ecosystem research, which is inconsistent with the interpretation of the traditional succession and steady-state management. On the other hand, research in other parts of the world indicated that the rangeland concepts and range models developed in United States did not well apply to the ecosystems in Africa and Asia where the prevailing environments are characterized by frequent disturbances and alternative conceptual frameworks are called for to provide more realistic, accurate interpretations of range vegetation dynamics and scientific support to natural resource management. In this context, equilibrium ecology emerged in response to the dissatisfaction of the prevailing ecological theory. In particular, an ecosystem-level research in east Africa presents a view of pastoral ecosystems that are nonequilibrial but persistent (persistent nonequilibrium model), and further research resulted the recognition of the importance of relative proportion of key resource in the dry/cold season as the determinant of animal numbers and their potential impacts on vegetation. The state and transition models which emerged in 1980s represented an important alternative conceptual framework and were applied in 1990s to rangeland assessment as a replacement of range condition in USA. Resilience is currently replacing nonequilibrium as the dominant ecological concept because ecosystems that were previously considered nonequilibrium is now more appropriately interpreted as multiple equilibria in many cases. The advances in rangeland ecological theory have been accompanied by parallel progression of rangeland management model, notably a transformation of the role of human from resource users to resource stewards. The rangeland models in twentieth century were generalized as steady-state management with the overall goal of maximizing sustainable production of forage and livestock. The application of resilience as the most recent and important ecological advance has been extended to coupled social-ecological systems, leading to the development of the concept and procedures of adaptive management. Currently the above described models are in application to a greater or less extent and synthesis of different models for rangeland assessment and management will help develop improved framework for complex, adaptive social- ecological systems.

Key words: rangeland, ecosystem, nonequilibrium, resilience, state-and-transition models, natural resource management

[1]    GILLSON L, HOFFMAN M T. Rangeland ecology in a changing world. Science, 2007, 315 (5808): 53-54. DOI: 10.1126/science. 1136577.
[2]    BRISKE D D. Rangeland Systems: Foundation for a conceptual framework. In: Briske, D D (ed), Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges.Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. 2017. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2.
[3]    邬建国. 生态学范式变迁综论. 生态学报, 1996 (5): 449-459.
WU J G. Paradigm shift in ecology: an overview. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1996 (5): 449-459. (in Chinese)
[4]    BRISKE D D, FUHLENDORF S D, SMEINS F E. Vegetation dynamics on rangelands: A critique of the current paradigms. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 40: 601-614.
[5]    HOLLING, C S 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4: 1-23.
[6]    WESTOBY M, WALKER B H, NOY-MEIR I. Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management, 1989, 42: 266-274.
[7]    CHAPIN F S III, KOFINAS G P, FOLKE C, CARPENTER S R, OLSSON P, ABEL N, BIGGS R, NAYLOR R L, PINKERTON E, SMITH D M, STEFFEN W, WALKER B, YOUNG O R. Resilience-based stewardship: Strategies for navigating sustainable pathways in a changing world. In Chapin F S III, et al. (eds), Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World, New York, US: Springer, 2009: 319-337.
[8]    CHAPIN F S III, CARPENTER S R, KOFINAS G P, FOLKE C, ABEL N, CLARK W C, OLSSON P, SMITH D M, WALKER B, YOUNG O R, BERKES F, BIGGS R, GROVE J M, NAYLOR R L, PINKERTON E, STEPHEN W, SWANSON F J. Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2010, 25: 241-249.
[9]    PICKETT S T A, OSTFELD R S. The shifting paradigm in ecology. In: Knight R L, Bates S F (eds), A New Century for Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1995: 261-278.
[10]   DYKSTERHUIS E J. Condition and management of rangeland based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management, 1949, 2: 104-105.
[11]   刘钟龄, 王炜, 梁存柱, 郝敦元. 内蒙古草原植被在持续牧压下退化演替的模式与诊断. 草地学报, 1998, 6 (4): 244-251.
LIU Z L, WANG W, LIANG C Z, HAO D Y. The Regressive succession pattern and its diagnostic of Inner Mongolia steppe in sustained and superstrong grazing. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 1998, 6 (4): 244-251. (in Chinese)
[12]   刘钟龄, 王炜, 郝敦元, 梁存柱. 内蒙古草原退化与恢复演替机理的探讨. 干旱区生态与环境, 2002, 16 (1): 84-91.
LIU Z L, WANG W, HAO D Y, LIANG C Z. Probes on the degeneration and recovery succession mechanisms of Inner Mongolia steppe. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2002, 16 (1): 84-91. (in Chinese)
[13]   王炜, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元, 梁存柱. 内蒙古草原退化群落恢复演替的研究. I. 退化草原的基本特征与恢复演替动力. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20 (5): 449-459.
WANG W, LIU Z L, HAO D Y, LIANG C Z. Research on the restoring succession of the degenerated grassland in Inner Mongolia. I. Basic characteristics and driving force for restoration of the degenerated grassland. Acta Thytoecologica Sinica, 1996, 20 (5): 449-459. (in Chinese)
[14]   王炜, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元, 梁存柱. 内蒙古草原退化群落恢复演替的研究. II. 恢复演替时间进程的分析. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20 (5): 460-471.
WANG W, LIU Z L, HAO D Y, LIANG C Z. Research on the restoring succession of the degenerated grassland in Inner Mongolia. II. Analysis of the restoring processes. Acta Thytoecologica Sinica, 1996, 20 (5): 460-471. (in Chinese)
[15]   王炜, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元, 梁存柱. 1997. 内蒙古退化草原植被对禁牧的动态响应. 气候与环境研究, 1997, 2 (3): 39-43.
WANG W, LIU Z L, HAO D Y, LIANG C Z. The dynamic response of degenerative steppe vegetation into grazing prohibited in the Inner Mongolia. Climatic and Environmental Research, 1997, 2 (3): 39-43. (in Chinese)
[16]   王炜, 梁存柱, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元. 羊草+大针茅草原群落退化演替机理的研究. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24 (4): 468-472.
WANG W, LIANG C Z, LIU Z L, HAO D Y. Mechanism of degradation succession in Leymus chinensis+Stipa grandis steppe community. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2000, 24 (4): 468-472. (in Chinese)
[17]   邵新庆, 王堃, 王赟文, 刘贵河. 典型草原自然恢复演替过程中植物群落动态变化. 生态学报, 2008, 28 (2): 855-861.
SHAO X Q, WANG K, WANG Y W, LIU G H. Dynamics of plant community during natural restoration and succession of the Inner Mongolia steppe. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28 (2): 855-861. (in Chinese)
[18]   BRISKE D D, FUHLENDORF S D, SMEINS F E. State-and- transition models, thresholds, and rangeland health: A synthesis of ecological concepts and perspectives. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2005, 58:1-10.
[19]   LAYCOCK W A. Stable states and thresholds of range condition on North American rangelands: A viewpoint. Journal of Range Management, 1991, 44: 427-433.
[20]   PETRAITIS P. Multiple Stable States in Natural Ecosystems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013: 188.
[21]   LEWONTIN R C. The meaning of stability. In: Diversity and Stability of Ecological Systems. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology No. 22. Brookhaven, New York, 1969.
[22]   MAY R M. Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature, 1977, 269: 471-477.
[23]   WU J, LOUCKS O L. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1995, 70: 439-466.
[24]   熊小刚, 韩兴国, 陈全胜, 米湘成. 2004. 平衡与非平衡生态学在锡林河流域典型草原放牧系统中的应用. 生态学报, 2004, 24 (10): 2165-2170.
XIONG X G, HAN X G, CHEN Q S, MI X C. Application of the equilibrium and non-equilibrium ecology to the dynamics of the steppe grazing system in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24 (10): 2165-2170. (in Chinese)
[25]   熊小刚, 韩兴国, 鲍雅静. 2005. 试论我国内蒙古半干旱草原灌丛沙漠化的研究. 草业学报, 2005, 14 (5): 1-5.
XIONG X G, HAN X G, BAO Y J. Discussion on the research into sandy desertification, accompanying by thicketization of semiarid grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2005, 14 (5): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[26]   ELLIS J E, SWIFT D M. Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: Alternate paradigms and implications for development. Journal of Range Management, 1988, 41: 450-459.
[27]   BEHNKE R H, SCOONES I, KERVEN C. Range ecology at disequilibrium: New models of natural variability and pastoral adaptation in African savannas. London: Overseas Development Institute, 1993.
[28]   ILLIUS A W, O’CONNOR T G. Resource heterogeneity and ungulate population dynamics. Oikos, 2000, 89: 283-294.
[29]   REID R S, FERNANDEZ-GIMENEZ M E, GALVIN K A. Dynamics and resilience of rangelands and pastoral peoples around the globe. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2014, 39: 217-242.
[30]   SAYRE N F. The Politics of Scale: A History of Rangeland Science. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
[31]   MILLER D J. New perspectives on range management and pastoralism and their implications for HKH-Tibetan Plateau Rangelands. In: Miller D. J. and Craig S R. (ed), Rangelands and Pastoral Development in the HKH. Kathmandu. Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, 1996.
[32]   ELLIS J E, COUGHENOUR M B, SWIFT D M. Climate variability, ecosystem stability and the implications for range and livestock development. In: Cincotta R P, Gay C W, Perrier G K (eds), New Concepts in International Rangeland Development: Theories and Applications. Proceedings of the International Rangeland Development Symposium, Washington, DC. Logan, USA: Utah State University. 14 January 1991.
[33]   KNAPP C N, FERNANDEZ-GIMENEZ M E. Understanding change: Integrating rancher knowledge into state-and-transition models. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2009, 62: 510-521.
[34]   KACHERGIS E J, KNAPP C N, FERNANDEZ-GIMENEZ M E, RITTEN J P, PRITCHETT J G, PARSONS J, HIBBS W, ROATH R. Tools for resilience management: Multidisciplinary development of state-and-transition models for northwest Colorado. Ecology and Society, 2013, 18 (4): 39.
[35]   BESTELMEYER B T, MOSELEY K, SHAVER P L, SANCHEZ H, BRISKE D D, AND  FERNANDEZ- GIMENEZ, M E. Practical guidance for developing state-and-transition models. Rangelands, 2010, 32: 23-30.
[36]   MILLER M E, BELOTE R T, BOWKER M A, GARMAN S L. Alternative states of a semiarid grassland ecosystem: Implications for ecosystem services. Ecosphere, 2011, 2 (5): art55.
[37]   JACKSON R, BARTOLOME J. A state-transition approach to understanding nonequilibrium plant community dynamics in Californian grasslands. Plant Ecology, 2002, 162: 49-65.
[38]   CZEMBOR C A, VESK P A. Incorporating between-expert uncertainty into state-and-transition simulation models for forest restoration. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 259: 165-175.
[39]   RUMPFF L, DUNCAN D H, VESK P A, KEITH D A, WINTLE B A. State-and-transition modelling for Adaptive Management of native woodlands. Biological Conservation, 2011, 144: 1224-1236.
[40]   BESTELMEYER B T, ASH A, BROWN J R, DENSAMBUU B, FERNÁNDEZ-GIMÉNEZ M, JOHANSON J, LEVI M, LOPEZ D, PEINETTI R, RUMPFF L, SHAVER P. State and Transition Models: Theory, Applications, and Challenges. In: Briske, D.D. (ed), Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. 2017.DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2.
[41]   熊小刚, 韩兴国, 周才平. 2005. 平衡与非平衡生态学下的放牧系统管理. 草业学报, 2005, 14 (6): 1-6.
XIONG X G, HAN X G, ZHOU C P. Grazing system management based on equilibrium and non-equil ibrium ecology. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2005, 14 (6): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[42]   熊小刚, 韩兴国. 运用状态与过渡模式讨论锡林河流域典型草原的灌丛化. 草业学报, 2006, 15 (2): 9-13.
XIONG X G, HAN X G. Application of state and transition models to discussing the thicketization of steppe in Xilin River Basin,  Inner Mongolia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2006, 15(2): 9-13. (in Chinese)
[43]   ASH A J, BELLAMY J A, STOCKWELL T G H. State and transition models for rangelands. 4. Application of state and transition models to rangelands in northern Australia. Tropical Grasslands, 1994, 28: 223-228.
[44]   TAYLOR J, MACLEOD N, ASH A. State and transition models: Bringing research, extension and management together. Tropical Grasslands, 1994, 28: 193-194.
[45]   PERLINSKI A T, PAIGE G B, MCCLARAN M P. Evaluating a state-and-transition model using a long-term dataset. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2014, 67 (2): 173-182.
[46]   AUGUSTINE D J, DERNER J D, DETLING J K. Testing for thresholds in a semiarid grassland: the influence of prairie dogs and plague. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2014, 67 (6): 701-709.
[47]   RITTEN J, FERNÁNDEZ-GIMÉNEZ M E, PRITCHETT J, KACHERGIS E, HIBBS W. Using state and transition models to show economic interdependence of ecological sites at the ranch level. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2017, 70 (6): 666-674.
[48]   NRC (National Research Council). Rangeland Health: New methods to Classify, Inventory and Monitor Rangelands. Washington, DC, US: National Academy Press, 1994.
[49]   SRM (Society for Range Management). New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. Journal of Range Management, 1995, 48: 271-282.
[50]   BRUEGGER R A, JIGJSUREN O, FERNANDEZ-GIMENEZ M E. Herder observations of rangeland change in Mongolia: Indicators, causes, and application to community-based management. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2014, 67: 119-131.
[51]   HILKER T, NATSAGDORJ E, WARING R H, LYAPUSTIN A, WANG Y J. Satellite observed widespread decline in Mongolian grasslands largely due to overgrazing. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20: 418-428.
[52]   HERRICK J E, VAN ZEE J W, HAVSTAD K M, BURKETT L M, WHITFORD W G. Monitoring manual for grassland, shrubland and savanna ecosystems. Volume I: Quick Start. Volume II: Design, supplementary methods and interpretation. Las Cruces, NM, USA: USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range, 2005.
[53]   VEBLEN K E, PYKE D A, ALDRIDGE CL, CASAZZA M L, ASSAL T J, FARINHA M A. Monitoring of livestock grazing effects on Bureau of Land Management Land. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 2014, 67: 68-77.
[54]   任继周, 李向林, 侯扶江. 草地农业生态学研究进展与趋势. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(8):1017-1021.
REN J Z, LI X L, HOU F J. Research progress and trend on grassland agroecology. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(8): 1017-1021. (in Chinese)
[55]   任继周,南志标,郝敦元.2002. 草业系统中的界面论. 草业学报, 2002, 9(1):1-8.
REN J Z, NAN Z B, HAO D Y. The three major interfaces within pratacultural system. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2002, 9(1):1-8. (in Chinese)
[56]   侯扶江, 于应文, 傅华, 朱宗元, 刘钟龄. 2004. 阿拉善草地健康评价的 CVOR 指数. 草业学报, 2004, 13 (4): 117-126.
HOU F J, YU Y W, FU H, ZHU Z Y, LIU Z L. CVOR index for health evaluation of Alashan grazing land. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 13 (4): 117-126. (in Chinese)
[57]   吴璇,王立新,刘华民,梁存柱,王炜,刘钟龄. 内蒙古高原典型草原生态系统健康评价和退化分级研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25 (5): 47-51.
WU X, WANG L X,LIU H M,LIANG C Z,WANG W,LIU Z L. Vigor and resilience of plant communities of typical steppe in Inner Mongolia Plateau. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011, 25 (5): 47-51. (in Chinese)
[58]   单贵莲,陈功,刘钟龄,闫志坚,初晓辉. 典型草原健康评价的VOR和CVOR指数. 草地学报, 2012, 20 (3): 401-406.
SHAN G L, CHEN G, LIU Z L, YAN Z J, CHU X H. VOR and CVOR index for health evaluation of typical steppe in Inner Mongolia. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20 (3): 401-406. (in Chinese)
[59]   LI Y, DONG S, WEN L, WANG X, WU Y. Three-dimensional framework of vigor, organization, and resilience (VOR) for assessing rangeland health: a case study from the alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. EcoHealth, 2014, 10: 423-433. DOI 10.1007/s10393-013-0877-8.
[60]   李向林, 万里强, 何峰, 刘玉杰. GB/T 21439-2008, 草原健康状况评价. 2008.URL: http://www.spc.org.cn/gb168/online/GB%252FT% 252021439-2008/
LI X L, WAN L Q, HE F, LIU Y J. GB/T 21439-2008, Assessment for the status of rangeland health. 2008. URL:http://www.spc.org.cn/ gb168/online/GB%252FT%252021439-2008/ (in Chinese)
[61]   GUNDERSON L H. Ecological resilience—In theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000, 31: 425-439.
[62]   闫海明,战金艳,张韬. 生态系统恢复力研究进展综述. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31 (3): 303-314.
YAN H M, ZHAN J Y, ZHANG T. Review of ecosystem resilience research progress. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31 (3): 303-314. (in Chinese)
[63]   FOLKE C. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social- ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16: 253-267.
[64]   WALKER B, HOLLING C, CARPENTER S, KINZIG A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 2004, 9 (2):5.
[65]   BRISKE D D, ILLIUS A W, ANDERIES J M. Nonequilibrium Ecology and Resilience Theory. In: Briske, D.D. (ed), Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. 2017. DOI 10.1007/978-3- 319-46709-2,
[66]   LUDWIG D. The era of management is over. Ecosystems, 2001, 4: 758-764.
[67]   BESTELMEYER B T, BRISKE D D. Grand challenges for resilience-based management of rangelands. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2012, 65: 654-663.
[68]   HOLLING C S. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Chinchester, UK: John Wiley and Sons. 1978.
[69]   WALTERS C J. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York, US: McMillan, 1986.
[70]   ALLEN C R, ANGELER D G, FONTAINE J J, GARMESTANI, A S, HART NM, POPE K L, AND TWIDWELL D. Adaptive Management of Rangeland Systems. In: Briske, D.D. (ed), Rangeland Systems: Processes, Management and Challenges. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2.
[1] FAN KaiKai,TONG XuZe,YAN YuChun,XIN XiaoPing,WANG Xu. Effect of Fairy Rings on Soil Respiration in Hulunber Meadow Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2595-2603.
[2] ZHANG YuMeng,LI Jing,ZENG Li,YANG XiaoNan,LIU JingYa,ZHOU ZiXiang. Optimal Protected Area Selection: Based on Multiple Attribute Decision Making Method and Ecosystem Service Research ——Illustrated by Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region Section of the Weihe River Basin [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(12): 2114-2127.
[3] ZHOU Jiang,XIANG PingAn. Ecological Emergy Analysis of Different Paddy Ecosystems in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(23): 4496-4514.
[4] LIU XianFeng, HU BaoYi, REN ZhiYuan. Spatiotemporal Variation of Water Use Efficiency and Its Driving Forces on the Loess Plateau During 2000-2014 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(2): 302-314.
[5] YIN Xing, ZHANG LiJuan, LIU XueJun, XU Wen, NI YuXue, LIU XinYu. Nitrogen Deposition in Suburban Croplands of Hebei Plain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(4): 698-710.
[6] LI Ting, LI Jing, WANG YanZe, ZENG Li. The Spatial Flow and Pattern Optimization of Carbon Sequestration Ecosystem Service in Guanzhong-Tianshui Economical Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(20): 3953-3969.
[7] WANG Jing-guo, LIN Shan, LI Bao-guo. Nitrogen Cycling and Management Strategies in Chinese Agriculture [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(3): 503-517.
[8] PAN Gen-xing, CHENG Kun, LU Hai-fei, LI Lian-qing, LIU Xiao-yu, BIAN Rong-jun, ZHANG Xu-hui, ZHENG Ju-feng, ZHENG Jin-wei. Sustainable Soil Management: An Emerging Soil Science Challenge for Global Development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(23): 4607-4620.
[9] CHENG Kun, YUE Qian, XU Xiang-rui, YAN Ming, PAN Gen-xing. Characterizing and Quantifying Soil Resilience for Ecosystem Services [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(23): 4621-4629.
[10] QI Yu-Chun-1, GUO Shu-Fang-1, 2 , DONG Yun-She-1, PENG Qin-1, JIA Jun-Qiang-1, 2 , CAO Cong-Cong-1, 2 , SUN Liang-Jie-1, 2 , YAN Zhong-Qing-1, 2 , HE Yun-Long-1, 2 . Advances in Research on the Effects of Irrigation on the Greenhouse Gases Emission and Soil Carbon Sequestration in Agro-ecosystem [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(9): 1764-1773.
[11] SA Ru-La-1, LI Jin-Xiang-2, HOU Xiang-Yang-1. Research on Soil Organic Carbon Storage Distribution in the Grassland Ecosystem [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(17): 3604-3614.
[12] GENG Yuan-Bo, SHI Jing-Jing. Application of the Carbon Isotope in the Partitioning of Soil Respiration in Grassland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(17): 3541-3550.
[13] LI Jun-Li, CAO Ming-Ming. Emergy Analysis of Agro-ecosystem of Resource-based City in Vulnerable Eco-regions ——A Case of Yulin City [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2552-2560.
[14] LI Jing, REN Zhi-Yuan. Research on the Values of CO2 Fixation and O2 Release by Landuse Ecosystem in Loess Plateau in Northern Shaanxi Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(14): 2943-2950 .
[15] WANG Xiao-zhi,YIN Wei-qin,SUN Wei,SHENG Hai-jun,FENG Ke,ZHU Jian-guo
. Effect of CO2 Enrichment on Ca and Mg Concentration in Soil Solution at Arable Layer in the Rice Season
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(20): 4221-4228 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!