Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 514-527.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.03.011

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analyses on the Emergies of Multiple Compound Cropping Systems from Double-Cropping Paddy Fields in Jiangxi Province

 SUN  Wei-Min-1, HUANG  Guo-Qin-1, CHENG  Jian-Feng-2, LIU  Bin-Bin-1   

  1. 1、Research Centre of Ecological Sciences, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045;
    2、Laboratory of Environmental Biology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045
  • Received:2013-05-15 Online:2014-02-01 Published:2013-07-22

Abstract: 【Objective】 Grain problem is always a hot issue concerned by the world. Seeking efficient cropping patterns, improving land utilization efficiency and enhancing grain production are the most urgent researches at present. From the results of related researches fields at home and abroad, multiple cropping patterns are the important approaches of utilizing natural resources and increasing crop production, so agriculture all over the world is developing toward the direction of multiple cropping patterns. In 1987, H T Odum, the famous ecologist in American, proposed the theory of emery analysis to explore the function principles and simulation technology of the complicated terrestrial ecosystems, and extended it to the ecological, environmental, social and economic systems involved in human. Since 1980’s, applying energy inputs and outputs to measure the good or bad of different ripe cycles and cropping patterns were focused and applied widely, which were beneficial for regulating the relationship between ecological environments and economic developments and had important practical values of scientific estimation and reasonable utilizations of natural resources. In the experiment, the resource utilizations, input and output benefits of multiple compound cropping systems from double-cropping paddy fields were clarified, which provided a theoretical foundation for the farming system reforms of winter compound cropping patterns in double-cropping paddy fields of south China and sustainable development of farmland ecosystems, the scientific and technological supports of moving forward roundly regional modern agriculture development and agricultural modernization constructions, reference frames of increasing grain production, farmers income and rural prosperity in the nation and regions. 【Method】 Energies of crop economic yields, photosynthetic productivities, solar energy utilization efficiencies, inputs, outputs, operating efficiencies and environmental loads of seven multiple cropping systems in Yujiang country of Jiangxi province were analyzed comprehensively with the theories and methods of emery analyses on the basis of data from field location experiments and related statistic yearbooks. 【Result】 The results showed that the energies of crops economic yields in winter multiple cropping were 217.57×106-229.7×106 kJ•hm-2 and higher than 213.5×106 kJ•hm-2 in winter fallow (T1); and energies of crops economic yields in the T4, T6 and T7 were significantly higher than those in the other treatments, the increasing percent of energy in T6 was 8.5% and the highest. Energy increasing percent of T6 was the highest in 2008-2010, which indicated that T6 had a better superiority and stability. Photosynthetic productivities (11.99-14.03 g•m-2•d-1) and solar energy utilization efficiencies (1.46%-1.70%) in winter multiple cropping were markedly significantly higher than those (10.55 g•m-2•d-1 and 1.28%, respectively) in T1, the average increasing ranges were 14.4%-34.8% with the highest increasing percent (34.8%) of T3, and the changes of photosynthetic productivities and solar energy utilization efficiencies were exactly alike. Energies of crops economic yields in winter multiple cropping rotations were 220.9×106-229.7×106 kJ•hm-2 and higher than 217.5×106 kJ•hm-2 in winter multiple continuous cropping (T2), and the increasing percent of energy in T6 was 6.1% and was the highest, but no significant difference was found among all treatments. Winter multiple cropping rotations reduced crop photosynthetic productivity to a certain extent, photosynthetic productivities (11.99-13.10 g•m-2•d-1) in winter multiple crop rotations were lower than 13.67 g•m-2•d-1 in T2 except the higher in T3, the average decreasing ranges were 4.2%-12.4% with the highest reduction of T4. The solar energy utilization efficiencies in T3 (1.70%) and T6 (1.67%) were significantly higher than those in the other treatments (1.46%-1.58%) which decreased with the highest reduction of T4 and T5 in comparison with T1. Emergy analyses indicated that the emergy inputs and outputs of all treatments existed obvious differences; the least of net loss of topsoil was 2.98×1016 sej in T1, the most was 3.83×1016 sej in T5; the least of industrial supplement emergy was 1.62×1017 sej in T1, the most was 2.98×1017 sej in T4 and nearly two times in T1; the least of organic emergy was 6.55×1015 sej in T1, the most was 1.19×1016 sej in T7 and nearly two times in T1; the least of output emergy was 1.39×1016 sej in T1, the most was 5.42×1016 sej in T6 and nearly four times in T1. Emergy input ratios (3.12-4.57) in winter multiple cropping were higher than 2.84 in T1 except the lower of 2.81 in T3, the increasing percents in T4 and T5 were 61.1% and 50.4%, respectively; but only emergy input ratio (0.13) in T4 was higher than 0.08 in T1, those (0.06-0.07) in the other treatments were lower. Emergy ratios of environmental resources to total inputs in the most treatments were 0.17-0.26 with the maximum reduction of T4 and lower than that in winter fallow, which showed that winter compound cropping patterns were favorable to protecting farmland environmental resources. Emergy ratio of unrenewalbe to total environmental resources in all winter compound cropping patterns were 0.10-0.15 and higher than that in T1, which suggested that planting winter crops mostly depended on the unrenewalbe environmental resources and could increase soil loss. Emergy ratio of industrial supplement to total inputs in all treatments exceeded 0.8, but had no obvious differences, which indicated that the productions of all cropping patterns depended on the industrial inputs and counted against agricultural sustainable development. 【Conclusion】In conclusion, planting winter crops in double-cropping paddy fields were better for increasing photosynthetic productivities and solar energy utilization efficiencies of paddy fields. Photosynthetic productivities and solar energy utilization efficiencies of planting economic crops except mixed green manure in winter multiple cropping rotations were lower than those in winter multiple continuous cropping. Planting broad bean and pea in double-cropping paddy fields in winter were more superior to fallow-double cropping rice system; but planting rape in double cropping rice system in winter was one of the high input and output patterns for sustainable developments; thus, planting rape in double cropping rice system in winter was the optimum multiple cropping.

Key words: double-cropping paddy field , multiple cropping , crop rotation , emergy , Jiangxi province

[1]朱万斌, 邱化蛟, 常欣, 程序. 农业生态系统生产力的概念及其度量方法. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(5): 983-989.

Zhu W B, Qiu H J, Chang X, Cheng X. The concept of agricultural productivity on ecosystem scale and its measurement. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(5): 983-989. (in Chinese)

[2]王家堂. 国外耕作制度及其发展趋势. 耕作与栽培, 1990 (4): 60.

Wang J T. Foreign farming systems and their development tendency. Tillage and Cultivation, 1990(4): 60. (in Chinese)

[3]Odum H T. Environmental Aaccounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

[4]王千, 金晓斌, 周寅康. 粮食主产区种植业生态经济系统投入产出能值空间差异与态势研究——以河北为例. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(1): 62-73.

Wang Q, Jin X B, Zhou Y K. Spatial differences and trend of emergy input and output indices of planting eco-economic system in major grain producing area: a case of Hebei province. Journal of Natural Resurces, 2012, 27(1): 62-73. (in Chinese)

[5]邓仕槐, 肖鸿, 张小洪, 张延宗. 废物处理方式对工业系统可持续性影响的能值分析. 资源科学, 2010, 32(9): 1806-1813.

Deng S H, Xiao H, Zhang X H, Zhang Y Z. Emergy evaluation of impacts of waste treatment methods on the sustainability of the industrial system. Resources Science, 2010, 32(9): 1806-1813. (in Chinese)

[6]李洪波, 李燕燕. 武夷山自然保护区生态旅游系统能值分析. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11): 5869-5876.

Li H B, Li Y Y. An emergy analysis on the ecotourism system of Wuyishan natural reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(11): 5869-5876. (in Chinese)

[7]Odum H T. Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science, 1988, 242(4882): 1132-1139.

[8]赵桂慎, 姜浩如, 吴文良. 高产粮区农田生态系统可持续性的能值分析. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(8): 318-323.

Zhao G S, Jiang H R, Wu W L. Sustainability of farmland ecosystem with high yield based on emergy analysis method. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(8): 318-323. (in Chinese)

[9]李俊莉, 曹明明. 生态脆弱区资源型城市农业生态系统的能值分析——以榆林市为例. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12): 2552-2560.

Li J L, Cao M M. Emergy analysis of agro-ecosystem of resource-based city in vulnerable Eco-egions——a case of Yulin city. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2552-2560. (in Chinese)

[10]苏芮, 陈亚宁, 李卫红, 周洪华, 马雁飞, 王国刚. 基于能值理论的农业复合系统评价与案例研究. 中国沙漠, 2012, 32(1): 226-234.

Su R, Chen Y N, Li W H, Zhou H H, Ma Y F, Wang G G. Assessment of agricultural complex system based on emergy and a case study. Journal of Desert Research, 2012, 32(1): 226-234. (in Chinese)

[11]李飞, 林慧龙, 常生华. 农牧交错带种植模式与种养模式的能值评价. 草地学报, 2007, 15(4): 322-326.

Li F, Lin H L, Chang S H. Emergy evaluation on the cropping mode and the cropping-breeding coupled mode in the ecotone between farming and pasturing areas. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2007, 15(4): 322-326. (in Chinese)

[12]税伟, 李碧军, 白剑平. 基于能流的生态农户分析与设计方法研究——以川北丘陵区一肉狗养殖户为例. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(7): 945-955.

Shui W, Li B J, Bai J P. Analysis and design methods of ecological farmer household based on emergy flow: A case study of dog-breeding farmer household in northern Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(7): 945-955. (in Chinese)

[13]王淑彬, 王开磊, 黄国勤. 江南丘陵区不同种植模式稻田生态系统服务价值研究——以余江县为例. 江西农业大学学报, 2011, 33(4): 636-642.

Wang S B, Wang K L, Huang G Q. A study on ecosystem service value of paddy fields in multiple cropping systems in southern hilly areas of China——taking Yujiang county as an example. Acta Agriculturae Universitis Jiangxiensis, 2011, 33(4): 636-642. (in Chinese)

[14]白小琳, 徐尚起, 汤文光, 陈阜, 胡清, 张海林. 不同耕作措施下双季稻田生态系统碳循环及其生态服务价值. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(12): 2489-2494.

Bai X L, Xu S Q, Tang W G, Chen F, Hu Q, Zhang H L. Ecosystem service value and carbon cycle of double cropping paddy under different tillage. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009, 28(12): 2489-2494. (in Chinese)

[15]余喜初, 李大明, 黄庆海, 喻耀民, 熊军, 胡惠文, 徐小林, 陈明. 鄱阳湖地区长期施肥双季稻田生态系统净碳汇效应及收益评估. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(9): 1777-1782.

Yu X C, Li D M, Huang Q H, Yu Y M, Xiong J, Hu H W, Xu X L, Chen M. Net carbon sink effects and economic benefits in double rice ecosystem under long-term fertilization in Poyang lake region. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011, 30(9): 1777-1782. (in Chinese)

[16]周卫军, 王克林, 王凯荣, 谢小立, 刘鑫, 王勤学, 渡边正孝. 长江流域稻田生态系统的水分和养分转换过程. 地理学报, 2004, 59(1): 25-32.

Zhou W J, Wang K L, Wang K R, Xie X L, Liu X, Wang Q X, Watanabe M. Experimental study on water and nutrient transformation in the paddy ecosystem of the Yangtze valley. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(1): 25-32. (in Chinese)

[17]肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞. 稻田生态系统氮素吸收功能及其经济价 值. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(9): 1068-1073.

Xiao Y, Xie G D, Lu C X. Process of nitrogen uptake by rice paddy ecosystem and its economic value. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(9): 1068-1073. (in Chinese)

[18]梁斐斐, 蒋先军, 袁俊吉, 何炳辉. 垄作稻田生态系统对三峡库区坡面径流中氮、磷的消纳以及降雨强度的影响. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(3): 7-11.

Liang F F, Jiang X J, Yuan J J, He B H. Sequestration of nitrogen and phosphorus and rainfall intensity influence in rice-based ecosystems of the three gorges reservoir area. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 26(3): 7-11. (in Chinese)

[19]肖玉, 谢高地, 鲁春霞. 稻田生态系统氮素转化经济价值研究. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(9): 1745-1750.

Xiao Y, Xie G D, Lu C X. Economic values of nitrogen transformation in rice field ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(9): 1745-1750. (in Chinese)

[20]李向东, 陈尚洪, 陈源泉, 高旺盛, 马月存, 马丽. 四川盆地稻田多熟高效保护性耕作模式的生态系统服务价值评估. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3782-3788.

Li X D, Chen S H, Chen Y Q, Gao W S, Ma Y C, Ma L. Evaluation of the multi-cropping ecosystem services under conservation tillage paddy field in Sichuan basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(11): 3782-3788. (in Chinese)

[21]杨海龙, 吕耀, 闵庆文, 张丹, 焦文珺, 何露, 刘珊, 孙业红. 稻鱼共生系统与水稻单作系统的能值对比——以贵州省从江县小黄村为例. 资源科学, 2009, 31(1): 48-55.

Yang H L, Lü Y, Min Q W, Zhang D, Jiao W J, He L, Liu S, Sun Y H. Emergy comparison of rice-fish agriculture and rice monocropping: a case study of Xiaohuang village, congjiang county, Guizhou province. Resources Science, 2009, 31(1): 48-55. (in Chinese)

[22]湖南农学院编著. 作物栽培学实验指导. 北京: 农业出版社, 1988.

Agricultural college of Hunan. The Exprimental Guide for Crop Cultivation. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1988. (in Chinese)

[23]黄国勤. 鄱阳湖区农业生态系统可持续发展研究. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2011.

Huang G Q. Studies on Sustainable Development of Agroecological System. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2011. (in Chinese)

[24]Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, Belt M V D. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.

[25]Brandt-Williams S. Handbook of Emergy Evaluation: A Compendium of Data for Emergy Computation Issued in A Series of Folios. Gainesville: University of Florida, 2001.

[26]La Rosa A, Siracusa G, Cavallaro R. Emergy evaluation of Sicilian red orange production. A comparison between organic and conventional farming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, 16(17): 1907-1914.

[27]Campbell D E, Brandt-Williams S L, Meisch M E A. Environmental Accounting Using Emergy: Evaluation of the State of West Virginia. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division, 2005.

[28]Lan S F, Odum H T, Liu X. Emergy flow and emergy analysis of the agroecosystems of China. Ecology Science, 1998, 17(1): 32-39.

[29]刘新卫, 陈百明, 杨红. 粮食生产系统的能值分析——以安塞县为例. 干旱地区农业研究, 2004, 22(2): 174-180.

Liu X W, Chen B M, Yang H. Emergy analysis of food producing system——A case study of Ansai county. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2004, 22(2): 174-180. (in Chinese)

[30]蓝盛芳, 钦佩, 陆宏芳. 生态经济系统能值分析. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2002.

Lan S F, Qin P, Lu H F. Emergy Analysis of Ecological Economic System. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002. (in Chinese)

[31]王卫文, 曹福祥, 康文星, 沙甲先, 何介南. 江西省农业生态经济

系统的能值指标分析. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(29): 208-213.

Wang W W, Cao F X, Kang W X, Sha J X, He J N. Emergy index analysis of agro-ecological economic system of Jiangxi province. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(29): 208-213. (in Chinese)

[32]熊凯, 杨钢桥, 蔡银莺. 基于能值理论的武汉市农田生态系统能值分析. 农业现代化研究, 2010, 31(6): 738-741.

Xiong K, Yang G Q, Cai Y Y. Emergy analysis of farmland ecosystems in Wuhan based on emergy theory. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2010, 31(6): 738-741. (in Chinese)

[33]沈学年, 刘巽浩. 多熟种植. 北京: 农业出版社, 1983.

Shen X N, Liu X H. Multiple Cropping. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1983. (in Chinese)

[34]周淑新, 董梅英, 孙苏卿. 作物生产与光合效率的相关分析. 张家口农专学报, 2003, 19(2): 4-5.

Zhou S X, Dong M Y, Sun S Q. Correlation analysis of crop production and photosynthetic efficiency. Journal of Zhangjiakou Agricultural College, 2003, 19(2): 4-5. (in Chinese)

[35]杨贵萍, 涂悦贤. 广东省水稻光能利用现状、潜力及提高途径. 广东农业科学, 1996(6): 9-10.

Yang G P, Tu Y X. The current situation, potential and improving approches of solar utilization in Guangdong province. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 1996(6): 9-10. (in Chinese)

[36]Chen G Q, Jiang M M, Chen B, Yang Z F, Lin C. Emergy analysis of Chinese agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 115(1): 161-173.
[1] GOU ZhiWen,YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,FAN ZhiLong,HU FaLong,ZHAO Cai,YU AiZhong,FAN Hong. Analysis of Sustainability of Multiple Cropping Green Manure in Wheat-Maize Intercropping After Wheat Harvested in Arid Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1319-1331.
[2] BiJiao MA,ZhiWen GOU,Wen YIN,AiZhong YU,ZhiLong FAN,FaLong HU,Cai ZHAO,Qiang CHAI. Effects of Multiple Cropping Green Manure After Wheat Harvest and Nitrogen Application Levels on Wheat Photosynthetic Performance and Yield in Arid Irrigated Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3501-3515.
[3] ZHANG WeiLi,KOLBE H,ZHANG RenLian. Research Progress of SOC Functions and Transformation Mechanisms [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(2): 317-331.
[4] DU YuQiong,ZHANG LiFeng,YAO ZhaoLei,ZHANG JiZong,LIU YuHua. Evaluation of Crop Rotation Yield Effect in Cold and Arid Regions of Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1205-1214.
[5] WU WenBin, YU QiangYi, LU Miao, XIANG MingTao, XIE AnKun, YANG Peng, TANG HuaJun. Key Research Priorities for Multiple Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(9): 1681-1694.
[6] ZHOU Jiang,XIANG PingAn. Ecological Emergy Analysis of Different Paddy Ecosystems in Hunan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(23): 4496-4514.
[7] FAN ZhiLong, ZHAO Cai, LIU Chang, YU AiZhong, YIN Wen, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang. Enhanced Effect of Two Years Plastic Film Mulching with Reduced Tillage on Grain Yield Formation of Wheat Rotation Under Reduced Irrigation and N Application [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(19): 3651-3662.
[8] CHEN Yin-jun, YI Xiao-yan, FANG Lin-na, YANG Rui-zhen. Analysis of Cultivated Land and Grain Production Potential in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(6): 1117-1131.
[9] LI Jun-Li, CAO Ming-Ming. Emergy Analysis of Agro-ecosystem of Resource-based City in Vulnerable Eco-regions ——A Case of Yulin City [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2552-2560.
[10]

LING Li-li,PENG Liang-zhi,CHUN Chang-pin,CAO Li,JIANG Cai-lun,LEI Ting

. Relationship Between Leaf Yellowing Degree and Nutrimental Elements Levels in Navel Orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) Leaves in Southern Jiangxi Province of China
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(17): 3602-3607 .
[11] FANG Xin-yu,LI Jun,WANG Xue-chun,REN Jing-jing
. Soil Desiccation of Alfalfa Fields and Effects of Alfalfa-Grain Crop Rotation on Soil Water Restoration of Desiccated Alfalfa Fields in Semi-Humid Areas of the Loess Plateau
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(16): 3348-3356 .
[12] TANG Hua-jun,WU Wen-bin,YANG Peng,ZHOU Qing-bo,CHEN Zhong-xin
. Recent Progresses in Monitoring Crop Spatial Patterns by Using Remote Sensing Technologies
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(14): 2879-2888 .
[13] . Effects of crop rotation and fertilization on soil organic C in semi-arid region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(3): 744-751 .
[14] ,,. Changes of Organic Carbon and Nutrient Contents in Highly Productive Paddy Soils in Yujiang County of Jiangxi Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(02): 324-330 .
[15] ,. Quantitative Evaluation of Land Use Efficiency Under Different Cropping Patterns [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(01): 57-60 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!