同垄种植对玉米||花生土壤有效磷分布特征和作物磷吸收利用的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.13.006

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Co-ridge planting can further enhance the yield advantage of maize (Zea mays L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) intercropping (maize||peanut). This study aimed to explore the distribution characteristics of available phosphorus in maize||peanut soil and the characteristics of phosphorus absorption and utilization in crops under the co-ridge planting, which could provide theoretical and technical basis for sustainable high-yield cultivation of maize||peanut. 【Method】 The experiment was conducted in the farm of Henan University of Science and Technology from 2023 to 2024, using a field randomized block experiment. Under the conditions of no phosphorus (P₀) and 180 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2 (P₁₈₀), the effects of co-ridge planting of maize and peanut intercropping (RIC) on the distribution characteristics of soil available phosphorus in 0-60 cm soil layer as well as the absorption and utilization of phosphorus by crops in maize||peanut were studied with flat planting of maize and peanut intercropping (FIC) as the control. 【Result】 In the horizontal direction, the distribution of soil available phosphorus in 0-60 cm soil layer under FIC treatment exhibited “ ” (gentle) characteristics, while under RIC treatment, it showed “ ” (ridge) characteristics, under P₁₈₀ the “low-high-low” “ ” (ridge) characteristics was more prominent. Compared with FIC, RIC was beneficial to increase the soil available phosphorus content in the 0-40 cm soil layer within the planting unit, which significantly increased by 18.38%-21.29% under P₁₈₀. Compared with FIC, RIC alleviated the interspecific phosphorus nutrition competition, increased the phosphorus content of intercropping maize and peanut, significantly increased the phosphorus accumulation, and promoted the phosphorus distribution to maize grain and peanut seed. Compared with FIC, RIC significantly increased the phosphorus absorption and yield of intercropping maize, intercropping peanut, and intercropping system, within the increase range of phosphorus absorption being 18.83%-32.62%, 24.08%-41.78% and 21.06%-37.14%, respectively (P<0.05). Compared with P₀, P₁₈₀ could further increase soil available phosphorus content and phosphorus content in maize and peanut, promote phosphorus absorption in intercropping system, and significantly increase maize and peanut yield and intercropping advantage. 【Conclusion】 The co-ridge planting could further improve the yield advantage of maize||peanut compared with flat planting. The key lied in the fact that it improved the available phosphorus distribution in 0-60 cm soil and increased the available phosphorus content in the 0-40 cm soil layer of the planting unit, alleviated the interspecific phosphorus nutrition competition, and promoted the absorption of phosphorus in maize and peanut and its distribution to seed. Phosphorus application had a significant positive regulation effect.

Key words: co-ridge planting, distribution characteristics of available phosphorus, phosphorus nutrition competition, phosphorus absorption, intercropping advantages, maize, peanut

LIANG Na, WANG JiangTao, WANG YingChao, ZHENG Bin, WANG XiaoXiao, LIU Juan, LIU Ling, FU GuoZhan, JIAO NianYuan. Effects of Co-Ridge Planting on the Distribution Characteristics of Soil Available Phosphorus and the Absorption and Utilization of Phosphorus by Crops in Maize||Peanut[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(13): 2564-2577.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.13.006

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/EN/Y2025/V58/I13/2564

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Effects of co-ridge planting on soil available phosphorus content of maize||peanut"

年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	土壤有效磷含量 Soil available phosphorus content (mg·kg^-1)
年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	土层深度 Soil depth (cm)	玉米行间 Maize rows (L1)	玉米株间 Maize plants (L2)	间距 Spacing (L3)	花生株间Peanut plants (L4)	花生行间 Peanut rows (L5)	种植单元 Planting unit (L2—L5)
2023	P₀	SC	0—10	3.21c	3.12c	/	3.93c	4.20c	/
		FIC		3.39c	3.52c	4.61c	2.84c	3.75c	3.68c
		RIC		3.93c	3.61c	4.84c	3.66c	3.98c	4.02c
	P₁₈₀	SC		27.83b	26.42b	/	30.54ab	25.74ab	/
		FIC		32.63a	27.43b	27.92b	27.10b	24.34b	26.70b
		RIC		25.66b	36.00a	35.59a	32.58a	27.74a	32.98a
	P₀	SC	10—20	2.16b	2.12c	/	3.39c	3.57c	/
		FIC		2.43b	2.03c	1.89b	2.80c	2.98c	2.42c
		RIC		2.12b	2.62c	2.30b	3.07c	3.21c	2.80c
	P₁₈₀	SC		16.59a	13.91b	/	17.63ab	22.94a	/
		FIC		17.63a	16.50ab	16.45a	15.54b	18.49b	16.75b
		RIC		15.91a	19.40a	16.59a	19.72a	22.30a	19.50a
	P₀	SC	20—40	2.03c	2.07b	/	3.16c	3.02c	/
		FIC		1.94c	2.16b	1.76c	2.53c	2.93c	2.34c
		RIC		1.85c	2.21b	2.21c	3.02c	3.07c	2.63c
	P₁₈₀	SC		4.56a	4.57a	/	6.06b	5.97b	/
		FIC		3.75ab	4.07a	5.47b	5.97b	5.83b	5.34b
		RIC		3.34b	5.02a	6.56a	7.56a	7.60a	6.68a
	P₀	SC	40—60	2.43a	1.80c	/	2.89a	2.80a	/
		FIC		2.07a	1.94bc	1.66b	2.48a	2.75a	2.21c
		RIC		2.43a	1.62c	2.12b	2.98a	3.02a	2.43bc
	P₁₈₀	SC		2.53a	2.71ab	/	3.43a	3.25a	/
		FIC		2.48a	2.07bc	3.34a	3.21a	2.84a	2.87b
		RIC		2.43a	3.21a	3.98a	3.61a	3.66a	3.61a
2024	P₀	SC	0—10	3.16c	2.84d	/	3.93c	3.93c	/
		FIC		3.70c	3.57d	4.02c	3.20c	3.34c	3.53c
		RIC		3.93c	3.79d	4.43c	3.70c	3.70c	3.91c
	P₁₈₀	SC		27.14a	26.33c	/	30.07ab	29.34a	/
		FIC		28.03a	28.22b	28.67b	28.50b	24.56b	27.49b
		RIC		26.10b	35.61a	35.11a	33.41a	28.52a	33.17a
	P₀	SC	10—20	2.03c	2.12c	/	3.43c	3.07c	/
		FIC		2.07c	2.53c	2.48b	2.52c	2.93c	2.61c
		RIC		1.98c	3.07c	2.75b	3.02c	2.98c	2.96c
	P₁₈₀	SC		20.33ab	19.49b	/	19.89ab	23.96a	/
		FIC		21.02a	19.97b	20.76a	18.65b	19.04b	19.60b
		RIC		19.47b	21.79a	22.32a	20.83a	23.07a	22.00a
	P₀	SC	20—40	1.89c	1.84c	/	2.93c	2.93d	/
		FIC		1.71c	1.71c	1.80c	2.21c	2.89d	2.15c
		RIC		1.53c	1.80c	1.98c	2.34c	2.93d	2.26c
	P₁₈₀	SC		3.75a	4.65ab	/	6.47a	5.92b	/
		FIC		3.20b	4.25b	4.61b	5.56b	4.79c	4.80b
		RIC		3.02b	5.06a	5.79a	6.51a	7.69a	6.26a
	P₀	SC	40—60	2.30a	1.66b	/	2.20b	2.57a	/
		FIC		2.43a	1.98b	1.57b	1.98b	2.43a	1.99b
		RIC		2.21a	1.98b	1.93b	2.30b	2.48a	2.17b
	P₁₈₀	SC		2.39a	2.07b	/	3.38a	3.34a	/
		FIC		2.84a	2.43b	3.47a	3.16a	3.29a	3.09a
		RIC		2.30a	3.20a	3.70a	3.38a	3.38a	3.42a

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

References 35

[1]	JIAO N Y, WANG J T, MA C, ZHANG C C, GUO D Y, ZHANG F S, JENSEN E S. The importance of aboveground and belowground interspecific interactions in determining crop growth and advantages of peanut/maize intercropping. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(6): 1460-1469.
[2]	林松明, 孟维伟, 南镇武, 徐杰, 李林, 张正, 李新国, 郭峰, 万书波. 玉米间作花生冠层微环境变化及其与荚果产量的相关性研究. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(1): 31-41.
	LIN S M, MENG W W, NAN Z W, XU J, LI L, ZHANG Z, LI X G, GUO F, WAN S B. Canopy microenvironment change of peanut intercropped with maize and its correlation with pod yield. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(1): 31-41. (in Chinese)
[3]	陈俊南, 姜文洋, 昝志曼, 汪江涛, 郑宾, 刘领, 刘娟, 焦念元. 玉米和花生同垄间作对作物光合特性和间作优势的影响. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2672-2682. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.010
	CHEN J N, JIANG W Y, ZAN Z M, WANG J T, ZHENG B, LIU L, LIU J, JIAO N Y. Effects of maize and peanut co-ridge intercropping on crop photosynthetic characteristics and intercropping advantages. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2672-2682. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.010
[4]	ZHU J Q, VAN DER WERF W, ANTEN N P R, VOS J, EVERS J B. The contribution of phenotypic plasticity to complementary light capture in plant mixtures. New Phytologist, 2015, 207(4): 1213-1222. doi: 10.1111/nph.13416 pmid: 25898768
[5]	CHEN G D, CHAI Q, HUANG G B, YU A Z, FENG F X, MU Y P, KONG X F, HUANG P. Belowground interspecies interaction enhances productivity and water use efficiency in maize-pea intercropping systems. Crop Science, 2015, 55(1): 420-428.
[6]	LI L, TILMAN D, LAMBERS H, ZHANG F S. Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytologist, 2014, 203(1): 63-69. pmid: 25013876
[7]	XIA H Y, WANG L, JIAO N Y, MEI P P, WANG Z G, LAN Y F, CHEN L, DING H B, YIN Y L, KONG W L, XUE Y H, GUO X T, WANG X F, SONG J, LI M. Luxury absorption of phosphorus exists in maize when intercropping with legumes or oilseed rape: Covering different locations and years. Agronomy, 2019, 9(6): 314.
[8]	BARGAZ A, NOYCE G L, FULTHORPE R, CARLSSON G, FURZE J R, JENSEN E S, DHIBA D, ISAAC M E. Species interactions enhance root allocation, microbial diversity and P acquisition in intercropped wheat and soybean under P deficiency. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 120: 179-188.
[9]	MEI P P, GUI L G, WANG P, HUANG J C, LONG H Y, CHRISTIE P, LI L. Maize/faba bean intercropping with rhizobia inoculation enhances productivity and recovery of fertilizer P in a reclaimed desert soil. Field Crops Research, 2012, 130: 19-27.
[10]	ZHOU L L, CAO J, ZHANG F S, LI L. Rhizosphere acidification of faba bean, soybean and maize. Science of The Total Environment, 2009, 407(14): 4356-4362.
[11]	LI S M, LI L, ZHANG F S, TANG C. Acid phosphatase role in chickpea/maize intercropping. Annals of Botany, 2004, 94(2): 297-303. pmid: 15238349
[12]	焦念元, 宁堂原, 赵春, 侯连涛, 李增嘉, 李友军, 付国占, 韩宾. 施氮量和玉米-花生间作模式对氮磷吸收与利用的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(4): 706-712.
	JIAO N Y, NING T Y, ZHAO C, HOU L T, LI Z J, LI Y J, FU G Z, HAN B. Effect of nitrogen application and planting pattern on N and P absorption and use in maize-peanut intercropping system. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(4): 706-712. (in Chinese)
[13]	高明, 张磊, 魏朝富, 谢德体. 稻田长期垄作免耕对水稻产量及土壤肥力的影响研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(4): 343-348, 354.
	GAO M, ZHANG L, WEI C F, XIE D T. Study of the changes of the rice yield and soil fertility on the paddy field under long-term no-tillage and ridge culture conditions. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science, 2004, 10(4): 343-348, 354. (in Chinese)
[14]	GU Y J, HAN C L, KONG M, SHI X Y, ZDRULI P, LI F M. Plastic film mulch promotes high alfalfa production with phosphorus-saving and low risk of soil nitrogen loss. Field Crops Research, 2018, 229: 44-54.
[15]	GRAEF H, KIOBIA D, SAIDIA P, KAHIMBA F, GRAEF F, EICHLER-LÖBERMANN B. Combined effects of biochar and fertilizer application on maize production in dependence on the cultivation method in a sub-humid climate. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2018, 49(22): 2905-2917.
[16]	焦念元, 侯连涛, 宁堂原, 李增嘉, 李友军, 付国占. 玉米花生间作氮磷营养间作优势分析. 作物杂志, 2007(4): 50-53.
	JIAO N Y, HOU L T, NING T Y, LI Z J, LI Y J, FU G Z. Analysis on the advantages of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition intercropping between maize and peanut. Crops, 2007(4): 50-53. (in Chinese)
[17]	李隆. 间套作体系豆科作物固氮生态学原理与应用. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2013: 97-101.
	LI L. The ecological principles and applications of biological N₂ fixation in legumes-based intercropping systems. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2013: 97-101. (in Chinese)
[18]	MEAD R, WILLEY R W. The concept of a ‘land equivalent ratio’ and advantages in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture, 1980, 16(3): 217-228.
[19]	ZHU S G, ZHU H, CHENG Z G, ZHOU R, YANG Y M, WANG J, WANG W, WANG B Z, TAO H Y, XIONG Y C. Soil water and phosphorus availability determines plant-plant facilitation in maize-grass pea intercropping system. Plant and Soil, 2023, 482(1): 451-467.
[20]	WANG L, CHEN X Q, CHENG B, YANG H, GAO Y, LI X N, XU M, YU L, WU Y S, ZHOU T, LIU W G, YANG W Y. Stage- specific phosphorus mobilization enhances phosphorus uptake in relay-intercropped soybean. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2025, 388: 109660.
[21]	SUN B R, GAO Y Z, WU X, MA H M, ZHENG C C, WANG X Y, ZHANG H L, LI Z J, YANG H J. The relative contributions of pH, organic anions, and phosphatase to rhizosphere soil phosphorus mobilization and crop phosphorus uptake in maize/alfalfa polyculture. Plant and Soil, 2020, 447(1): 117-133.
[22]	SUN B R, GAO Y Z, YANG H J, ZHANG W, LI Z J. Performance of alfalfa rather than maize stimulates system phosphorus uptake and overyielding of maize/alfalfa intercropping via changes in soil water balance and root morphology and distribution in a light chernozemic soil. Plant and Soil, 2019, 439(1): 145-161.
[23]	WANG L Y, HOU B C, ZHANG D S, LYU Y, ZHANG K, LI H G, RENGEL Z, SHEN J B. The niche complementarity driven by rhizosphere interactions enhances phosphorus-use efficiency in maize/alfalfa mixture. Food and Energy Security, 2020, 9(4): e252.
[24]	王旭清, 王法宏, 任德昌, 曹宏鑫, 董玉红. 小麦垄作栽培的田间小气候效应及对植株发育和产量的影响. 中国农业气象, 2003, 24(2): 6-9.
	WANG X Q, WANG F H, REN D C, CAO H X, DONG Y H. Micro-climatic effect of raised-bed planting of wheat and its influence on plant development and yield. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2003, 24(2): 6-9. (in Chinese)
[25]	慈恩, 王莲阁, 丁长欢, 谢德体. 垄作免耕对稻田垄埂土壤有机碳累积和作物产量的影响. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(3): 576-586.
	CI E, WANG L G, DING C H, XIE D T. Effects of no-tillage ridge-cultivation on soil organic carbon accumulation in ridges and crop yields in paddy fields. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(3): 576-586. (in Chinese)
[26]	OBOUR A K, MIKHA M M, HOLMAN J D, STAHLMAN P W. Changes in soil surface chemistry after fifty years of tillage and nitrogen fertilization. Geoderma, 2017, 308: 46-53.
[27]	杨封科, 何宝林, 董博, 王立明. 不同降雨年型黑膜垄作对土壤水肥环境及马铃薯产量和效益的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(20): 4312-4325. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.20.006.
	YANG F K, HE B L, DONG B, WANG L M. Effects of black film mulched ridge-furrow tillage on soil water-fertilizer environment and potato yield and benefit under different rainfall year in semiarid region. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4312-4325. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.20.006. (in Chinese)
[28]	YANG F K, HE B L, DONG B, ZHANG G P. Autumn film mulched ridge microfurrow planting improves yield and nutrient-use efficiency of potatoes in dryland farming. Agronomy, 2023, 13(6): 1563.
[29]	赵靓, 侯振安, 李水仙, 刘立鹏, 黄婷, 张扬. 磷肥用量对土壤速效磷及玉米产量和养分吸收的影响. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(2): 123-128.
	ZHAO L, HOU Z A, LI S X, LIU L P, HUANG T, ZHANG Y. Effects of P rate on soil available P, yield and nutrient uptake of maize. Maize Science, 2014, 22(2): 123-128. (in Chinese)
[30]	ZHOU T, WANG L, SUN X, WANG X C, PU T, YANG H, RENGEL Z, LIU W G, YANG W Y. Improved post-silking light interception increases yield and P-use efficiency of maize in maize/soybean relay strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 2021, 262: 108054.
[31]	LIU X, RAHMAN T, SONG C, YANG F, SU B Y, CUI L, BU W Z, YANG W Y. Relationships among light distribution, radiation use efficiency and land equivalent ratio in maize-soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 2018, 224: 91-101.
[32]	谷晓博. 种植方式和施氮量对土壤环境及冬油菜产量的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018.
	GU X B. Effect of planting patterns and nitrogen fertilization on soil environment and yield of winter oilseed rape[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[33]	HAKIM R O, KINAMA J M, KITONYO O M, CHEMINING’WA G N. Effect of tillage method and mulch application on growth and yield of green gram in semiarid Kenya. Advances in Agriculture, 2022, 2022(1): 4037022.
[34]	佘玮, 黄璜, 郑华斌, 姚林, 崔国贤. 垄作梯式栽培对水稻养分吸收利用和根区土壤养分的影响. 作物研究, 2015, 29(4): 357-361.
	SHE W, HUANG H, ZHENG H B, YAO L, CUI G X. Effects of ridge and terraced rice farming on nutrient uptake and utilization in rice and soil nutrient contents. Crop Research, 2015, 29(4): 357-361. (in Chinese)
[35]	焦念元, 汪江涛, 张均, 付国占, 李友军. 化学调控和施磷对玉米/花生间作磷吸收利用和间作优势的影响. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2015, 23(9): 1093-1101.
	JIAO N Y, WANG J T, ZHANG J, FU G Z, LI Y J. Effects of chemical regulation and P fertilization on P absorption and utilization in maize/ peanut intercropping system. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(9): 1093-1101. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	玉米各器官磷含量 Phosphorus content in different organs of maize (g·kg^-1)
			开花期 Anthesis stage			成熟期 Maturity stage
						茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	苞叶 Bract	茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	苞叶 Bract	籽粒 Grain
2023	P₀	SM	1.82c	1.90d	1.89d	0.82d	1.27c	0.82d	1.33b
		FIM	1.93c	2.10c	1.89d	0.85d	1.32bc	0.96c	1.40b
		RIM	1.98c	2.14c	2.12c	0.87d	1.49b	1.04bc	1.58b
	P₁₈₀	SM	2.61b	3.33b	2.34b	1.01c	2.71a	1.10b	2.39a
		FIM	2.66b	3.37ab	2.44ab	1.07b	2.76a	1.29a	2.48a
		RIM	2.89a	3.49a	2.59a	1.21a	2.77a	1.37a	2.61a
2024	P₀	SM	1.39d	2.03d	2.09d	0.84d	1.75e	0.75c	1.50e
		FIM	1.71c	2.58c	2.27c	0.91cd	1.87de	0.84bc	1.71d
		RIM	1.79c	2.68c	2.32c	0.99c	2.02cd	0.89bc	1.81d
	P₁₈₀	SM	2.54b	3.82b	2.86b	1.17b	2.15bc	0.96b	2.56c
		FIM	2.61b	3.90b	3.00a	1.33a	2.28b	1.14a	2.78b
		RIM	2.84a	4.14a	3.11a	1.40a	2.65a	1.28a	3.05a

年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	花生各器官磷含量 Phosphorus content in different organs of peanut (g·kg^-1)
			结荚期 Podding stage			成熟期 Maturity stage
						茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	果仁 Seed	茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	果仁 Seed
2023	P₀	SP	0.90c	1.81c	2.92bc	0.84b	1.69d	3.38c
		FIP	0.80c	1.67d	2.71d	0.68c	1.54e	3.09e
		RIP	0.85c	1.74cd	2.74d	0.70c	1.61de	3.20d
	P₁₈₀	SP	1.55a	2.16a	3.10a	1.42a	2.05a	3.94a
		FIP	1.35b	2.04b	2.89c	1.34a	1.81c	3.83b
		RIP	1.42ab	2.09ab	3.04ab	1.36a	1.93b	3.92ab
2024	P₀	SP	1.31d	1.98d	3.08c	1.08d	1.86c	3.40d
		FIP	1.24e	1.81e	2.75d	0.81e	1.56e	2.96f
		RIP	1.28de	1.87e	2.87d	1.01d	1.72d	3.25e
	P₁₈₀	SP	1.97a	2.61a	3.97a	1.80a	2.26a	4.22a
		FIP	1.71c	2.39c	3.63b	1.41c	2.02b	3.87c
		RIP	1.89b	2.51b	3.85a	1.58b	2.12b	4.14b

年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	磷积累量P accumulation (mg/plant)					磷分配比例P distribution proportion (%)
年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	苞叶 Bract	籽粒 Grain	单株 Per plant	茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	苞叶 Bract	籽粒 Grain
2023	P₀	SM	32.1e	26.2e	6.0e	106.6e	170.9f	18.8a	15.3bc	3.5a	62.4a
		FIM	36.9e	28.7e	7.6de	131.9e	205.1e	18.1ab	14.0cd	3.7a	64.2a
		RIM	45.4d	34.9d	11.6cd	180.1d	272.0d	16.7abc	12.9d	4.2a	66.2a
	P₁₈₀	SM	63.8c	84.6c	14.5c	276.2c	439.1c	14.6c	19.3a	3.3a	62.8a
		FIM	75.3b	94.5b	22.3b	324.6b	516.7b	14.6c	18.3a	4.3a	62.8a
		RIM	96.2a	99.9a	27.9a	390.0a	614.0a	15.7bc	16.3b	4.5a	63.5a
2024	P₀	SM	35.0f	32.6f	4.4e	93.2f	165.2f	21.2a	19.7a	2.7bc	56.4c
		FIM	42.9e	38.1e	6.1e	156.4e	243.3e	17.6b	15.6b	2.5bc	64.3b
		RIM	57.2d	45.6d	9.0d	202.9d	314.8d	18.2b	14.5b	2.9b	64.5b
	P₁₈₀	SM	80.6c	51.3c	11.4c	332.8c	476.0c	16.9bc	10.8c	2.4c	69.9a
		FIM	104.5b	61.6b	16.5b	423.6b	606.1b	17.2bc	10.2c	2.7bc	69.9a
		RIM	122.0a	79.9a	26.0a	537.1a	765.0a	16.0c	10.4c	3.4a	70.2a

年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	磷积累量P accumulation (mg/plant)				磷分配比例P distribution proportion (%)
年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	果仁 Seed	单株 Per plant	茎 Stem	叶 Leaf	果仁 Seed
2023	P₀	SP	27.4d	21.0c	57.2c	105.6c	26.0c	19.9ab	54.1a
		FIP	13.8f	12.7e	30.9f	57.4e	24.1d	22.1a	53.8a
		RIP	18.5e	17.1d	45.8e	81.4d	22.7e	21.0a	56.3a
	P₁₈₀	SP	61.3a	31.7a	95.4a	188.3a	32.5b	16.8c	50.7b
		FIP	39.3c	19.9c	50.5d	109.8c	35.8a	18.1bc	46.0c
		RIP	45.9b	24.2b	66.1b	136.2b	33.7b	17.8bc	48.5bc
2024	P₀	SP	31.9c	21.6b	50.9b	104.4c	30.5b	20.7b	48.8a
		FIP	15.6e	11.9e	24.7e	52.1f	29.9b	22.8a	47.3ab
		RIP	21.7d	14.4d	32.8d	68.9e	31.4b	20.9b	47.6ab
	P₁₈₀	SP	61.9a	31.2a	75.4a	168.5a	36.7a	18.5c	44.8b
		FIP	33.0c	18.4c	41.0c	92.4d	35.7a	19.9bc	44.3b
		RIP	42.2b	22.6b	55.6b	120.4b	35.1a	18.8c	46.1ab

年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	玉米Maize (kg·hm^-2)		花生Peanut (kg·hm^-2)		体系磷吸收量 P absorption of system (kg·hm^-2)	磷间作优势 P intercropping advantage (kg P·hm^-2)
年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	单作 SC	间作 IC	单作 SC	间作 IC	体系磷吸收量 P absorption of system (kg·hm^-2)	磷间作优势 P intercropping advantage (kg P·hm^-2)
2023	P₀	FIC	11.4b	25.6d	27.8b	16.6d	20.2d	1.1d
	P₀	RIC	11.4b	34.0c	27.8b	23.6c	27.8c	8.6b
	P₁₈₀	FIC	29.3a	64.6b	49.6a	31.8b	44.9b	6.1c
	P₁₈₀	RIC	29.3a	76.7a	49.6a	39.5a	54.4a	15.5a
2024	P₀	FIC	11.0b	30.4d	27.5b	15.1d	21.2d	2.5c
	P₀	RIC	11.0b	39.3c	27.5b	20.0c	27.7c	8.9b
	P₁₈₀	FIC	31.7a	75.8b	44.4a	26.8b	46.4b	8.7b
	P₁₈₀	RIC	31.7a	95.6a	44.4a	34.9a	59.2a	21.5a

Effects of Co-Ridge Planting on the Distribution Characteristics of Soil Available Phosphorus and the Absorption and Utilization of Phosphorus by Crops in Maize||Peanut

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 35

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WEI WenHua, LI Pan, SHAO GuanGui, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, FAN Hong, HE Wei, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LianHao. Response of Silage Maize Yield and Quality to Reduced Irrigation and Combined Organic-Inorganic Fertilizer in Northwest Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1521-1534.
[2]	XUE YuQi, ZHAO JiYu, SUN WangSheng, REN BaiZhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG JiWang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Forms on Yield and Quality of Summer Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1535-1549.
[3]	CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, SHAO GuanGui, WU XiaYu, YIN Wen, ZHAO LianHao, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong. The Regulatory Effect of Reduced Irrigation and Combined Organic- Inorganic Fertilizer Application on Stay-Green Characteristics in Silage Maize Leaves After Tasseling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1381-1396.
[4]	YUE RunQing, LI WenLan, DING ZhaoHua, MENG ZhaoDong. Molecular Characteristics and Resistance Evaluation of Transgenic Maize LD05 with Stacked Insect and Herbicide Resistance Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1269-1283.
[5]	LI XinYu, HOU MingYu, CUI ShunLi, LIU YingRu, LI XiuKun, LIU LiFeng. Construction of Near Infrared Spectrometry Model for Flavonoids Content of Peanut with Red and Black Testa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1284-1295.
[6]	ZHAO Yao, CHENG Qian, XU TianJun, LIU Zheng, WANG RongHuan, ZHAO JiuRan, LU DaLei, LI CongFeng. Effects of Plant Type Improvement on Root-Canopy Characteristics and Grain Yield of Spring Maize Under High Density Condition [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1296-1310.
[7]	ZOU XiaoWei, XIA Lei, ZHU XiaoMin, SUN Hui, ZHOU Qi, QI Ji, ZHANG YaFeng, ZHENG Yan, JIANG ZhaoYuan. Analysis of Disease Resistance Induced by Ustilago maydis Strain with Overexpressed UM01240 Based on Transcriptome Sequencing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1116-1130.
[8]	YANG YongQing, HU PengJu, SONG YaHui, JIN XinXin, SU Qiao, WANG Jin. QTL Mapping of Quality Traits for A Peanut Germplasm SW9721-3 with Ultra-High Oil Content [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 635-646.
[9]	ZHOU GuangFei, MA Liang, MA Lu, ZHANG ShuYu, ZHANG HuiMin, SONG XuDong, ZHANG ZhenLiang, LU HuHua, HAO DeRong, MAO YuXiang, XUE Lin, CHEN GuoQing. Genome-Wide Association Study of Husk Traits in Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 431-442.
[10]	WANG JiaXin, HU JingYi, ZHANG Wei, WEI Qian, WANG Tao, WANG XiaoLin, ZHANG Xiong, ZHANG PanPan. Effects of Different Mulching Methods on the Production of Photosynthetic Substances and Water Use Efficiency of Intercropped Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 460-477.
[11]	ZHANG FangFang, SONG QiLong, GAO Na, BAI Ju, LI Yang, YUE ShanChao, LI ShiQing. Effects of Long-Term Mulching Practices on Maize Yield, Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Fractions and Indexes Related to Carbon and Nitrogen Pool on the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 507-519.
[12]	CAO ShiLiang, ZHANG JianGuo, YU Tao, YANG GengBin, LI WenYue, MA XueNa, SUN YanJie, HAN WeiBo, TANG Gui, SHAN DaPeng. Heterosis Groups Research in Maize Inbred Lines Based on Machine Learning [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 203-213.
[13]	ZHANG SiJia, YANG Jie, ZHAO Shuai, LI LiWei, WANG GuiYan. The Impact of Diversified Crops and Wheat-Maize Rotations on Soil Quality in the North China Plain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 238-251.
[14]	LI XiangYu, LIU JianZhuo, HU DanDan, LIU GengYu, CHEN LiangYu, LI Bing, DU WanLi, SONG Bo. Characterization of Maize Germplasm Resistance to Common Smut and Analysis of Physiological Differences [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(13): 2504-2521.
[15]	WANG PengFei, YU AiZhong, WANG Feng, WANG YuLong, LÜ HanQiang, SHANG YongPan, Yin Bo, LIU YaLong, ZHANG DongLing, HUO JianZhe, JIANG KeQiang, PANG XiaoNeng. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Maize Agronomic Traits, Grain Yield and Quality Under Green Manure Returning to Field System in Arid Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(13): 2552-2563.

年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	玉米产量 Maize yield (kg·hm^-2)		花生产量 Peanut yield (kg·hm^-2)		体系产量 Intercropping system yield (kg·hm^-2)	间作产量优势 Intercropping yield advantage (kg·hm^-2)	土地当量比 Land equivalent ratio
年份 Year	磷水平 P level	种植方式 Planting pattern	单作 SC	间作 IC	单作 SC	间作 IC	体系产量 Intercropping system yield (kg·hm^-2)	间作产量优势 Intercropping yield advantage (kg·hm^-2)	土地当量比 Land equivalent ratio
2023	P₀	FIC	6540b	5312d	4167a	1667c	6979d	1556b	1.21c
	P₀	RIC	6540b	6009c	4167a	2028b	8037c	2614a	1.41a
	P₁₈₀	FIC	9847a	7412b	5694a	2167b	9579b	1686b	1.14d
	P₁₈₀	RIC	9847a	7911a	5694a	2778a	10689a	2796a	1.29b
2024	P₀	FIC	4798b	3687d	4000b	1221c	4908d	486c	1.08b
	P₀	RIC	4798b	4483c	4000b	1604b	6087c	1664b	1.34a
	P₁₈₀	FIC	8282a	6857b	5667a	1625b	8482b	1430b	1.11b
	P₁₈₀	RIC	8282a	7565a	5667a	1923a	9488a	2437a	1.25a