绿肥部分替代化肥对玉米干物质积累与产量形成的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.13.005

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Replacing some chemical nitrogen fertilizers with leguminous green manure is an important technical measure to achieve reduced fertilizer application. The effects of hairy vetch which was planted to replace winter wheat and nitrogen reduction on the accumulation and transportation of dry matter accumulation, yield formation, and post flowering leaf senescence characteristics of maize in North China were studied, so as to provide a scientific basis for leguminous winter green manure substitution for chemical nitrogen fertilizer and optimized management of nitrogen resources in maize. 【Method】 The two-factor split plot field experiment was carried out from 2020 to 2022 at Shenzhou Experimental Station of Dryland Farming Institute of Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. The two modes, including the winter fallow field (FF) and hairy vetch being planted in the winter fallow field and total returning (HV), were set as main treatment, and the five nitrogen application rates of maize were set as sub-treatment, including no nitrogen application (0 N), 67.5 kg·hm^-2(25% N), 135.0 kg·hm^-2(50% N), 202.5 kg·hm^-2(75% N), and 270.0 kg·hm^-2(100% N, the conventional nitrogen application level). Yield and yield components, ear agronomic traits, dry matter accumulation and transport, leaf senescence characteristics of maize, and changes in soil nutrients and enzyme activity were investigated, moreover, the nitrogen surplus in farmland were analyzed.【Result】 Returning hairy vetch to the field significantly increased maize yield and could compensate for the reduction in maize yield caused by chemical nitrogen reduction. From 2021 to 2022, the return of hairy vetch dramatically raised maize yield (8.15%-9.21%), which could compensate for the grain yield loss caused by 25%-50% reduction in nitrogen fertilization. Continuous return of hairy vetch significantly reduced the bare top length, dramatically increased the ear length, the ear diameter, and yield components, such as row number, kernels number per row, and hundred-grain weight. After returning hairy vetch to the field, the dry matter accumulation before and after flowering, the dry matter accumulation rate after flowering, and the contribution rate of dry matter after flowering to grains significantly increased by 10.21-12.32 g/plant, 39.94-72.37 g/plant, 4.67%-4.78%, and 3.31%-3.99%, respectively, which could compensate for the negative effect of reducing nitrogen fertilizer application by 25%-50% on the dry matter accumulation before flowering and the contribution rate of dry matter after flowering to grains of maize. The incorporation of hairy vetch prominently postponed the post-anthesis leaf senescence of maize. In 2021 and 2022, the green leaf area of maize treated with HV was 303.44-1 115.10 and 266.23-837.62 cm²/plant higher than that under FF, respectively. The relative green leaf area after flowering increased by 1.12% -13.84% and 0.56% -9.13%, respectively. V_max decreased by 0.30% and 0.05%, respectively. T_max was delayed by 6.01 days and 3.56 days, respectively. The organic matter content, total nitrogen content, alkaline nitrogen content, as well as the activities of urease, sucrase, amylase, and protease in the soil significantly increased after continuous returning of hairy vetch to the field. In 2021 and 2022, the nitrogen rates under HV could increase by 40.92 and 72.79 kg·hm^-2, respectively; the optimal chemical nitrogen applications under HV could be reduced by 40.96 and 48.90 kg·hm^-2, respectively; the nitrogen surplus under HV could be decreased by 7.94 and 0.14 kg·hm^-2, respectively; HV could replace a maximum nitrogen application rate of 15.71% and 19.71%, respectively, which could replace conventional nitrogen application rates of 15.71% and 26.23%, respectively. 【Conclusion】 The incorporation of hairy vetch could activate soil enzyme activity, effectively enhance soil nitrogen nutrient supply capacity, delay post popcorn leaf senescence, increase the contribution rate of post flowering dry matter accumulation to grains, and improve ear traits and coordinate yield composition, which all were beneficial for increasing and stabilizing maize yield after nitrogen reduction. The input of soil nitrogen by hairy vetch was the basis for its partial replacement of chemical nitrogen fertilizer and compensation for the yield loss caused by chemical nitrogen reduction. The use of hairy vetch instead of partial chemical nitrogen fertilizer in the seasonal fallow areas of winter wheat in North China was a sustainable nitrogen reduction measure.

Key words: hairy vetch, reduced nitrogen application, maize, yield, day matter accumulation, soil nitrogen supply capacity

QIN WenLi, ZHI JianFei, XIE Nan, ZHANG LiFeng, LIU ZhongKuan, LIU ZhenYu, FENG Wei, PAN Xuan, DAI YunXia. Effects of Partial Replacement of Chemical Fertilizers with Green Manure on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield Formation of Maize[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(13): 2549-2567.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Effects of hair vetch and nitrogen reduction on grain yield, yield components and ear agronomic traits of maize"

年份 Year	种植模式 Cropping pattern	氮肥用量 N rate（%）	秃尖长 Bare top length (cm)	穗长 Ear length (cm)	穗粗 Ear diameter (cm)	穗行数 Row number per ear	行粒数 Kernels per row	百粒重 100-kernel weight (g)	产量 Yield (kg·hm^-2)
2021	HV	0	1.33±0.01ab	16.77±0.32bcd	4.86±0.02bc	14.82±0.35abc	32.09±0.65d	33.44±0.98cd	5785.18±123.70cd
		25	1.28±0.02abc	16.82±0.33bcd	4.88±0.05abc	14.91±0.06ab	34.21±0.48abc	34.00±0.81bc	6148.89±116.10b
		50	1.27±0.04bc	16.92±0.48abc	4.89±0.02abc	14.92±0.28ab	35.14±0.62ab	35.25±0.82ab	6324.92±45.47ab
		75	1.22±0.06c	17.22±0.50ab	4.94±0.02a	14.97±0.12ab	35.26±0.78ab	35.67±0.58a	6459.31±45.93a
		100	1.21±0.07c	17.46±0.05a	4.93±0.03ab	15.02±0.19a	35.67±1.05a	35.55±0.32a	6440.21±63.74a
	FF	0	1.38±0.06a	15.88±0.28e	4.83±0.03c	13.28±0.06d	30.40±1.15e	32.42±0.13d	5258.34±93.96e
		25	1.35±0.02ab	16.03±0.25e	4.87±0.09abc	13.37±0.08d	32.96±1.06cd	33.27±0.44cd	5639.97±30.77d
		50	1.33±0.07ab	16.29±0.27de	4.87±0.05abc	13.57±0.06d	33.11±1.43cd	34.01±0.29bc	5793.48±157.63cd
		75	1.31±0.03ab	16.61±0.19cd	4.89±0.02abc	14.55±0.09c	33.94±1.04bc	34.52±0.95abc	5924.06±193.97c
		100	1.27±0.03bc	16.73±0.06bcd	4.90±0.10abc	14.68±0.08bc	34.40±0.88abc	34.59±1.09abc	6193.47±132.03b
ANOVA
CP			**	**	ns	**	**	*	**
N			**	**	*	*	**	**	**
CP×N			ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	**	ns
2022	HV	0	1.84±0.04bc	16.81±0.22de	4.88±0.08c	15.33±0.14c	34.38±1.02cd	33.60±0.05c	7739.82±247.12e
		25	1.56±0.12cd	16.93±0.20cde	5.03±0.00ab	15.42±0.04bc	36.15±0.85ab	34.62±0.40ab	9429.09±65.12b
		50	1.53±0.14cd	17.21±0.32bcd	5.04±0.03ab	15.47±0.12abc	36.59±0.35a	34.90±0.22a	9989.90±226.21a
		75	1.34±0.17d	17.41±0.14abc	5.05±0.03a	15.51±0.16abc	36.85±0.76a	34.89±0.27a	10090.84±103.68a
		100	1.49±0.15cd	17.81±0.27a	5.04±0.09ab	15.73±0.18a	36.64±0.53a	34.62±0.36ab	10057.07±80.53a
	FF	0	2.26±0.17a	15.78±0.47f	4.50±0.09ed	15.31±0.14c	29.01±0.80e	33.03±0.38d	6606.35±367.61f
		25	1.98±0.30ab	16.60±0.12e	4.73±0.09d	15.40±0.27c	33.35±1.28d	34.16±0.44b	8349.78±198.51d
		50	1.80±0.29bc	16.78±0.43de	4.91±0.10bc	15.42±0.13bc	35.00±0.75bc	34.25±0.14b	8985.62±207.15c
		75	1.80±0.13bc	17.26±0.34bcd	5.02±0.04ab	15.49±0.10abc	35.02±0.86bc	34.38±0.38ab	9605.43±229.68b
		100	1.77±0.18bc	17.61±0.14ab	5.04±0.01ab	15.71±0.14ab	35.13±0.35bc	34.43±0.14ab	9771.69±104.89b
ANOVA
CP			**	**	**	*	**	*	**
N			**	**	**	**	**	**	**
CP×N			ns	ns	ns	**	**	ns	ns

Table 2

Table 3

Effects of hair vetch and nitrogen reduction on accumulation and transport of maize dry matter"

年份 Year	种植模式 Cropping pattern	氮肥用量 N rate （%）	花前干物质积累量 DMABF (g/plant)	花后干物质积累量 DMAAF (g/plant)	花前干物质积累率DMARBF (%)	花后干物质积累率DMARAF (%)	干物质转运量DMT (g/plant)	干物质转运率 DMTR rate (%)	花前干物质积累贡献率 CRDMABF (%)	花后干物质积累贡献率CRDMAAF (%)
2021	HV	0	140.62±2.18ef	150.10±3.31d	48.37±0.31d	51.63±0.31c	31.54±2.39ab	29.41±2.19bc	19.42±1.47ab	80.58±1.47cd
		25	146.40±3.25d	165.75±2.91c	46.90±0.75e	53.10±0.75b	34.67±1.77a	28.39±1.22c	18.86±1.20b	81.14±1.20c
		50	153.89±2.89abc	176.01±4.59b	46.65±0.74ef	53.35±0.74ab	33.75±1.20a	26.30±0.75d	17.10±0.52c	82.90±0.52b
		75	158.70±4.48a	183.31±5.98ab	46.40±0.52ef	53.60±0.52ab	33.10±1.37ab	25.34±1.07de	16.30±0.89cd	83.70±0.89ab
		100	158.84±5.05a	187.30±4.82a	45.89±0.22f	54.11±0.22a	30.54±1.40b	22.97±0.85e	15.24±0.43d	84.76±0.43a
	FF	0	128.25±1.73g	126.15±6.67d	50.43±1.16c	49.57±1.16d	32.70±2.30ab	34.65±2.06a	22.25±1.70a	77.75±1.70d
		25	136.49±2.72f	133.03±2.06d	50.64±0.74bc	49.36±0.74d	35.14±2.29a	33.50±1.73ab	21.89±0.94a	78.11±0.94d
		50	143.64±3.65de	137.27±9.35d	51.17±1.95abc	48.83±1.95d	34.60±1.43a	31.79±0.43b	21.01±0.48a	78.99±0.48d
		75	148.30±3.76cd	132.91±14.64d	52.82±2.90a	47.18±2.90d	33.08±1.91ab	29.29±1.61c	19.78±1.04ab	80.22±1.04cd
		100	150.74±2.11bcd	133.42±2.09d	53.05±0.51a	46.95±0.51e	31.91±1.18ab	26.94±0.59d	18.51±0.67b	81.49±0.67c
ANOVA
CP			**	**	**	**	ns	**	**	**
N			**	**	ns	ns	*	**	**	**
CP×N			ns	**	*	*	ns	ns	ns	ns
2022	HV	0	168.73±2.61e	276.49±5.18c	37.90±0.53b	62.10±0.53a	28.85±0.98c	21.89±0.89bc	15.12±0.59b	84.88±0.59c
		25	178.19±2.00c	303.44±9.63b	37.01±0.92b	62.99±0.92a	30.82±0.47ab	20.77±0.43cd	14.68±0.36bc	85.32±0.36c
		50	184.13±1.91b	324.51±6.58a	36.20±0.52b	63.80±0.52a	29.92±0.79bc	19.08±0.20e	13.21±0.26d	86.79±0.26b
		75	189.19±4.14ab	321.99±8.72a	37.02±1.13b	62.98±1.13a	27.69±1.05cd	16.41±0.38f	12.12±0.51e	87.88±0.51a
		100	191.11±3.01a	317.94±6.39a	37.54±±0.53b	62.46±0.53a	26.66±0.96d	15.54±0.31g	12.03±0.41e	87.97±0.41a
	FF	0	156.88±0.93f	225.29±3.64e	41.05±0.65a	58.95±0.65b	28.62±1.90b	24.29±0.86a	19.51±1.98a	80.49±1.98d
		25	166.74±2.71e	236.31±4.89d	41.37±0.86a	58.63±0.86b	31.14±1.50ab	23.35±1.21ab	18.96±1.62a	81.04±1.62d
		50	171.08±2.72de	238.72±9.36d	41.76±1.00a	58.24±1.00b	32.05±1.09a	22.08±0.53bc	18.34±0.99a	81.66±0.99d
		75	176.32±4.90cd	242.16±11.23d	42.15±1.81a	57.85±1.81b	30.00±1.36abc	19.84±1.47de	15.99±1.28b	84.01±1.47c
		100	178.74±3.42c	240.02±9.47d	42.70±1.42a	57.30±1.42b	29.97±2.05abc	19.61±0.86de	14.32±0.86bcd	85.68±0.86bc
ANOVA
CP			**	**	**	**	**	**	**	**
N			**	**	ns	ns	**	**	**	**
CP×N			ns	**	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns

Table 3

Fig 2

Fig 3

Table 4

Leaf senescence change characteristic equation of maize under different treatments"

年份 Year	种植模式 Cropping pattern	氮肥用量 N rate（%）	叶片衰老变化特征方程 Leaf senescence change characteristic equation	决定系数 Coefficient of determination（R²）	V_max (%)	T_max (d)
2021	HV	0	y=e^3.229-0.092^x/(1+e^3.2229-0.092^x）×100%	0.964	2.300	35.098
		25	y=e^3.393-0.085^x/(1+e^3.393-0.085^x）×100%	0.958	2.125	39.918
		50	y=e^3.865-0.090^x/(1+e^3.865-0.090^x）×100%	0.967	2.250	42.944
		75	y=e^4.044-0.091^x/(1+e^4.044-0.091^x）×100%	0.960	2.275	44.440
		100	y=e^3.929-0.090^x/(1+e^3.929-0.090^x）×100%	0.965	2.250	43.656
		平均 Average	y=e^3.617-0.088^x/(1+e^3.617-0.088^x）×100%	0.964	2.200	41.102
	FF	0	y=e^3.338-0.112^x/(1+e^3.338-0.112^x）×100%	0.986	2.800	29.804
		25	y=e^3.521-0.107^x/(1+e^3.521-0.107^x）×100%	0.983	2.675	32.907
		50	y=e^3.464-0.097^x/(1+e^3.464-0.097^x）×100%	0.968	2.425	35.711
		75	y=e^3.709-0.098^x/(1+e^3.709-0.098^x）×100%	0.964	2.45	37.847
		100	y=e^3.820-0.097^x/(1+e^3.820-0.097^x）×100%	0.965	2.425	39.381
		平均 Average	y=e^3.509-0.100^x/(1+e^3.509-0.100^x）×100%	0.975	2.500	35.090
2022	HV	0	y=e^4.372-0.113^x/(1+e^4.372-0.113^x）×100%	0.964	2.825	38.690
		25	y=e^4.524-0.110^x/(1+e^4.524-0.110^x）×100%	0.953	2.750	41.127
		50	y=e^4.056-0.105^x/(1+e^4.056-0.105^x）×100%	0.949	2.625	42.914
		75	y=e^4.686-0.106^x/(1+e^4.686-0.106^x）×100%	0.949	2.650	44.208
		100	y=e^4.723-0.107^x/(1+e^4.723-0.107^x）×100%	0.949	2.675	44.140
		平均 Average	y=e^4.535-0.108^x/(1+e^4.535-0.108^x）×100%	0.953	2.700	41.991
	FF	0	y=e^4.208-0.122^x/(1+e^4.208-0.122^x）×100%	0.984	3.050	34.492
		25	y=e^4.237-0.113^x/(1+e^4.237-0.113^x）×100%	0.976	2.825	37.496
		50	y=e^4.212-0.107^x/(1+e^4.212-0.107^x）×100%	0.961	2.675	39.365
		75	y=e^4.335-0.107^x/(1+e^4.335-0.107^x）×100%	0.953	2.675	40.514
		100	y=e^4.295-0.104^x/(1+e^4.295-0.104^x）×100%	0.950	2.600	41.298
		平均 Average	y=e^4.228-0.110^x/(1+e^4.228-0.110^x）×100%	0.968	2.750	38.436

Table 4

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Table 5

References 52

[1]	赵其国, 沈仁芳, 滕应, 李秀华. 我国地下水漏斗区耕地轮作休耕制度试点成效及对策建议. 土壤, 2018, 50(1): 1-6.
	ZHAO Q G, SHEN R F, TENG Y, LI X H. Pilot progress and countermeasures on farmland rotation and fallow system in the groundwater funnel area of China. Soils, 2018, 50(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[2]	翁玲云, 杨晓卡, 吕敏娟, 辛思颖, 陈帅, 马文奇, 魏静. 长期不同施氮量下冬小麦-夏玉米复种系统土壤硝态氮累积和淋洗特征. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2551-2558. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201808.026
	WENG L Y, YANG X Q, LÜ M J, XIN S Y, CHEN S, MA W Q, WEI J. Characteristics of soil nitrate accumulation and leaching under different long-term nitrogen application rates in winter wheat and summer maize rotation system. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(8): 2551-2558. (in Chinese)
[3]	曹卫东, 包兴国, 徐昌旭, 聂军, 高亚军, 耿明建. 中国绿肥科研60年回顾与未来展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1450-1461.
	CAO W D, BAO X G, XU C X, NIE J, GAO Y J, GENG M J. Reviews and prospects on science and technology of green manure in China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(6): 1450-1461. (in Chinese)
[4]	张帆, 杨茜. 紫云英与双季稻秸秆协同利用影响稻田土壤钾循环与平衡. 草业学报, 2021, 30(1): 72-80. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020089
	ZHANG F, YANG Q. Effects of co-utilization of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw on the potassium cycle and potassium balance in a paddy soil. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 72-80. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020089
[5]	杨叶华, 张松, 王帅, 刘正兰, 方林发, 张学良, 刘瑞, 张建伟, 张宇亭, 石孝均. 中国不同区域常见绿肥产量和养分含量特征及替代氮肥潜力评估. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 39-55. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019397
	YANG Y H, ZHANG S, WANG S, LIU Z L, FANG L F, ZHANG X L, LIU R, ZHANG J W, ZHANG Y T, SHI X J. Yield and nutrient concentration in common green manure crops and assessment of potential for nitrogen replacement in different regions of China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 39-55. (in Chinese)
[6]	MAITRA S, ZAMAN A, MANDAL T K, PALAI J B. Green manures in agriculture: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 2018, 7(5): 1319-1327.
[7]	刘蕊, 常单娜, 高嵩涓, 周国朋, 韩梅, 张久东, 曹卫东, 孙小凤. 西北小麦与豆科绿肥间作体系箭筈豌豆和毛叶苕子生物固氮效率及氮素转移特性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2184-2194.
	LIU R, CHANG D N, GAO S J, ZHOU G P, HAN M, ZHANG J D, CAO W D, SUN X F. Nitrogen fixation and transfer efficiency of common vetch and hairy vetch in wheat-vetch intercropping system in Northwest China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2184-2194. (in Chinese)
[8]	KEBEDE E. Contribution, utilization, and improvement of legumes-driven biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2021, 5: 767998.
[9]	李红燕, 胡铁成, 曹群虎, 鱼昌为, 曹卫东, 黄冬琳, 翟丙年, 高亚军. 旱地不同绿肥品种和种植方式提高土壤肥力的效果. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5): 1310-1318.
	LI H Y, HU T C, CAO Q H, YU C W, CAO W D, HUANG D L, ZHAI B N, GAO Y J. Effect of improving soil fertility by planting different green manures in different patterns in dryland. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(5): 1310-1318. (in Chinese)
[10]	YAO Z Y, XU Q, CHEN Y P, LIU N, LI Y Y, ZHANG S Q, CAO W D, ZHAI B N, WANG Z H, ZHANG D B, ADL S, GAO Y J. Leguminous green manure enhances the soil organic nitrogen pool of cropland via disproportionate increase of nitrogen in particulate organic matter fractions. Catena, 2021, 207: 105574.
[11]	ZHOU G P, CAO W D, BAI J S, XU C X, ZENG N H, GAO S J, REES R M, DOU F G. Co-incorporation of rice straw and leguminous green manure can increase soil available nitrogen (N) and reduce carbon and N losses: An incubation study. Pedosphere, 2020, 30(5): 661-670.
[12]	赵秋, 张新建, 宁晓光. 华北冬绿肥作物养分累积特征及对翻压前土壤养分的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(5): 61-67.
	ZHAO Q, ZHANG X J, NING X G. Study on green manure crops nutrient accumulation and effect on soil nutrients before returning in North China. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(5): 61-67. (in Chinese)
[13]	梁鑫宇, 宋明丹, 韩梅, 李正鹏. 有机物料腐解过程中养分的释放特征及其影响因素. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(6): 1082-1090.
	LIANG X Y, SONG M D, HAN M, LI Z P. Release characteristics and influencing factors of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus during decomposition of organic materials. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2023, 29(6): 1082-1090. (in Chinese)
[14]	王晋龙, 孙崇凤, 程永钢, 郑普山, 洪坚平. 不同绿肥对复垦地土壤化学性状及酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(9): 85-93.
	WANG J L, SUN C F, CHENG Y G, ZHENG P S, HONG J P. Effects of different green manures on chemical properties and enzyme activities of reclaimed soil. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(9): 85-93. (in Chinese)
[15]	戴伊莎, 成欣, 刘帮艳, 何鲜, 胡梦阳, 杨武魁, 王龙昌, 武海燕, 李茜, 吴进红. 秸秆和紫云英协同覆盖对西南旱地土壤养分、酶活性及小麦产量的影响. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(6): 1339-1347.
	DAI Y S, CHENG X, LIU B Y, HE X, HU M Y, YANG W K, WANG L C, WU H Y, LI Q, WU J H. Impacts of synergistic mulching of straw and milk vetch on soil nutrients, enzyme activities and wheat yield in upland of southwest China. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(6): 1339-1347. (in Chinese)
[16]	李丽娜, 席运官, 陈鄂, 和丽萍, 王磊, 肖兴基, 田伟. 耕作方式与绿肥种植对土壤微生物组成和多样性的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018, 34(4): 342-348.
	LI L N, XI Y G, CHEN E, HE L P, WANG L, XIAO X J, TIAN W. Effects of tillage and green manure crop on composition and diversity of soil microbial community. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2018, 34(4): 342-348. (in Chinese)
[17]	高嵩涓. 冬绿肥—水稻模式下的土壤微生物特征及硝化作用调控机制[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2018.
	GAO S J. Soil microbial community and the regulation mechanisms of nitrification in winter green manure-rice cropping system[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[18]	韩梅, 高嵩娟, 李正鹏, 严清彪, 曹卫东. 青海高原长期复种绿肥毛叶苕子对土壤氨氧化细菌和氨氧化古菌的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(4): 102-108.
	HAN M, GAO S J, LI Z P, YAN Q B, CAO W D. Effects of green manure crop on abundances of ammonia-oxidizing Archaea and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soil in Qinghai Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(4): 102-108. (in Chinese)
[19]	谭英爱, 赵秋, 田秀平, 周丽平, 宁晓光, 张新建, 岳露. 冬绿肥覆盖翻压对土壤碳、氮含量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(5): 81-87.
	TAN Y A, ZHAO Q, TIAN X P, ZHOU L P, NING X G, ZHANG X J, YUE L. Effect of winter green manure overturning on soil carbon and nitrogen content. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 49(5): 81-87. (in Chinese)
[20]	殷芳, 何小七, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 殷文, 柴强. 复种绿肥补偿减量施氮导致的小麦光合效能和产量损失. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(11): 1990-2000.
	YIN F, HE X Q, FAN Z L, HU F L, FAN H, YIN W, CHAI Q. Compensation of photosynthesis indexes and yield loss of wheat caused by nitrogen reduction with multiple cropping green manures. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(11): 1990-2000. (in Chinese)
[21]	毛小红, 李正鹏, 严清彪, 韩梅. 青海高原麦后复种毛叶苕子对小麦体内养分积累、转运和分配的影响. 青海大学学报, 2022, 40(1): 41-48.
	MAO X H, LI Z P, YAN Q B, HAN M. Effects of multiple cropping of Vicia villosa L. after wheat in Qinghai Plateau on the nutrient accumulation, transport and distribution of wheat. Journal of Qinghai University, 2022, 40(1): 41-48. (in Chinese)
[22]	张小毅, 刘文露, 向焱赟, 肖峰, 田伟, 张玉盛, 敖和军. 混合绿肥还田对双季稻干物质积累及产量的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 47(6): 609-615.
	ZHANG X Y, LIU W L, XIANG Y Y, XIAO F, TIAN W, ZHANG Y S, AO H J. Effects of returning mixed green manure on dry matter accumulation and yield of double cropping rice. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 47(6): 609-615. (in Chinese)
[23]	苟志文, 殷文, 徐龙龙, 何小七, 王琦明, 柴强. 绿洲灌区复种豆科绿肥条件下小麦稳产的减氮潜力. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2195-2203.
	GOU Z W, YIN W, XU L L, HE X Q, WANG Q M, CHAI Q. Potential of nitrogen reduction for maintaining wheat grain yield under multiple cropping with leguminous green manure in irrigated oasis. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2195-2203. (in Chinese)
[24]	杨绣娟, 孙继颖, 高聚林, 刘剑, 孟繁盛, 张悦忠, 温晓亮, 王志刚, 于晓芳, 刘文翔, 王彦淇. 不同生态条件下氮肥对玉米干物质积累、氮素分配及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2023, 38(3): 108-120. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20193260
	YANG X J, SUN J Y, GAO J L, LIU J, MENG F S, ZHANG Y Z, WEN X L, WANG Z G, YU X F, LIU W X, WANG Y Q. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter accumulation, nitrogen distribution and yield of maize under different ecological conditions. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2023, 38(3): 108-120. (in Chinese)
[25]	钱晨晨, 王淑彬, 杨滨娟, 黄国勤. 紫云英与氮肥配施对早稻干物质生产及氮素吸收利用的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(4): 563-571.
	QIAN C C, WANG S B, YANG B J, HUANG G Q. Effect of combined application of Chinese milk vetch and nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen uptake, utilization and dry matter accumulation in early rice. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(4): 563-571. (in Chinese)
[26]	马艳芹, 钱晨晨, 邓丽萍, 黄国勤. 紫云英配施氮肥对双季稻产量、干物质量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 核农学报, 2017, 31(12): 2399-2407. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.12.2399
	MA Y Q, QIAN C C, DENG L P, HUANG G Q. Effects of combining Chinese milk vetch with nitrogen fertilizer on grain and dry matter yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization of double-cropping rice. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(12): 2399-2407. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.12.2399
[27]	吕丽华, 赵明, 赵久然, 陶洪斌, 王璞. 不同施氮量下夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性的变化. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2624-2632. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.09.008.
	LÜ L H, ZHAO M, ZHAO J R, TAO H B, WANG P. Canopy structure and photosynthesis of summer maize under different nitrogen fertilizer application rates. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(9): 2624-2632. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.09.008. (in Chinese)
[28]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[29]	张忠学, 尚文彬, 齐智娟, 郑恩楠, 刘明. 不同水氮管理下玉米叶片衰老对氮转移效率的影响. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(12): 297-303, 267.
	ZHANG Z X, SHANG W B, QI Z J, ZHENG E N, LIU M. Effects of different water and nitrogen managements on nitrogen remobilization efficiency during leaf senescence in maize. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(12): 297-303, 267. (in Chinese)
[30]	关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
	GUAN S Y. Soil Enzyme and Its Research Methods. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1986. (in Chinese)
[31]	苏向向, 于爱忠, 吕汉强, 王玉珑. 绿洲灌区小麦复种绿肥并翻压还田对翌年玉米产量形成及氮素吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(7): 1208-1218.
	SU X X, YU A Z, LÜ H Q, WANG Y L. Effects of wheat multiple cropping with green manure on grain yield formation and nitrogen absorption and utilization of maize in oasis irrigation area in Northwest China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(7): 1208-1218. (in Chinese)
[32]	罗跃, 卢秉林, 周国朋, 常单娜, 高嵩涓, 张久东, 车宗贤, 朱青, 曹卫东. 河西绿洲灌区玉米间作绿肥根茬还田的氮肥减施效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(12): 2125-2135.
	LUO Y, LU B L, ZHOU G P, CHANG D N, GAO S J, ZHANG J D, CHE Z X, ZHU Q, CAO W D. Effects of returning the root of green manure on reducing N application in maize within their intercropping system in Hexi oasis irrigation area. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(12): 2125-2135. (in Chinese)
[33]	柴健, 于爱忠, 李悦, 王玉珑, 王凤, 王鹏飞, 吕汉强, 杨学慧, 尚永盼. 绿肥还田量结合氮肥减施对绿洲灌区小麦产量和氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2023, 49(11): 3131-3140. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.31017
	CHAI J, YU A Z, LI Y, WANG Y L, WANG F, WANG P F, LÜ H Q, YANG X H, SHANG Y P. Effects of green manure incorporation combined with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on wheat yield and nitrogen utilization in oasis irrigated area. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(11): 3131-3140. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.31017
[34]	廖育林, 鲁艳红, 谢坚, 周兴, 聂军, 汤文光, 杨曾平. 紫云英配施控释氮肥对早稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3): 190-195, 201.
	LIAO Y L, LU Y H, XIE J, ZHOU X, NIE J, TANG W G, YANG Z P. Effects of combined application of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and Chinese milk vetch on yield and nitrogen nutrient uptake of early rice. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(3): 190-195, 201. (in Chinese)
[35]	魏全全, 张萌, 柳玲玲, 顾小凤, 秦松, 芶久兰. 豆科绿肥还田及氮肥减施对黄壤玉米生长的影响. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(4): 66-73.
	WEI Q Q, ZHANG M, LIU L L, GU X F, QIN S, GOU J L. Effects of leguminous green manure return and nitrogen fertilizer reduction on maize growth in yellow soil. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 52(4): 66-73. (in Chinese) doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004?3268.2023.04.008
[36]	卢秉林, 车宗贤, 张久东, 包兴国, 吴科生, 杨蕊菊. 氮肥减量下长期间作毛叶苕子根茬还田对玉米产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2384-2397. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.12.010.
	LU B L, CHE Z X, ZHANG J D, BAO X G, WU K S, YANG R J. Effects of long-term intercropping of maize with hairy vetch root returning to field on crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency under nitrogen fertilizer reduction. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2384-2397. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.12.010. (in Chinese)
[37]	CAI F, MI N, MING H Q, ZHANG Y S, ZHANG H, ZHANG S J, ZHAO X L, ZHANG B B. Responses of dry matter accumulation and partitioning to drought and subsequent rewatering at different growth stages of maize in Northeast China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14: 1110727.
[38]	周琦, 张富仓, 李志军, 强生才, 田建柯, 李国栋, 范军亮. 施氮时期对夏玉米生长、干物质转运与产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(1): 76-82.
	ZHOU Q, ZHANG F C, LI Z J, QIANG S C, TIAN J K, LI G D, FAN J L. Effects of nitrogen application at different stages on growth, yield, and dry matter transportation of summer maize. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(1): 76-82. (in Chinese)
[39]	张磊, 孔丽丽, 侯云鹏, 于雷, 李海燕, 王立春. 施氮水平对玉米开花后干物质积累、转运及土壤无机氮含量的影响. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(4): 155-164.
	ZHANG L, KONG L L, HOU Y P, YU L, LI H Y, WANG L C. Effects of nitrogen application on dry matter accumulation, translocation, and inorganic nitrogen content in soil after anthesis of maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(4): 155-164. (in Chinese)
[40]	WANG H Y, WU J Q, LI G, YAN L J. Changes in soil carbon fractions and enzyme activities under different vegetation types of the northern Loess Plateau. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10(21): 12211-12223. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6852 pmid: 33209282
[41]	焦亚鹏, 齐鹏, 王晓娇, 武均, 姚一铭, 蔡立群, 张仁陟. 施氮量对农田土壤有机氮组分及酶活性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(12): 2423-2434. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.010.
	JIAO Y P, QI P, WANG X J, WU J, YAO Y M, CAI L Q, ZHANG R Z. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on soil organic nitrogen components and enzyme activities in farmland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(12): 2423-2434. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.12.010. (in Chinese)
[42]	杨文权, 卢彪儒, 程宇阳, 魏倩倩, 寇建村. 白三叶降解对陕西地区苹果园土壤酶活性的影响. 草业科学, 2019, 36(2): 295-303.
	YANG W Q, LU B R, CHENG Y Y, WEI Q Q, KOU J C. Effect of Trifolium repens degradation on apple orchard soil enzyme activities in different regions. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(2): 295-303. (in Chinese)
[43]	刘威, 耿明建, 秦自果, 张智, 鲁君明, 鲁剑巍, 曹卫东. 种植绿肥与稻秸协同还田对单季稻田土壤有机碳库和酶活性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(7): 125-133.
	LIU W, GENG M J, QIN Z G, ZHANG Z, LU J M, LU J W, CAO W D. Effects of co-incorporation of green manure planting and rice straw on soil organic carbon pool and soil enzyme activity in a mono-rice cropping system. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(7): 125-133. (in Chinese)
[44]	李慧敏, 田胜营, 李丹丹, 李增强, 谭钧, 赵炳梓. 有机物料施用对潮土活性有机碳及微生物群落组成的影响. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(3): 777-787.
	LI H M, TIAN S Y, LI D D, LI Z Q, TAN J, ZHAO B Z. Effect of application of organic materials on content of labile organic carbon and composition of microbial community in fluvio-aquatic soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(3): 777-787. (in Chinese)
[45]	石一鸣, 于春晓, 李可心, 张海波, 王光美. 黄河三角洲盐碱地毛叶苕子不同还田方式下腐解及养分释放特征. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(12): 183-191.
	SHI Y M, YU C X, LI K X, ZHANG H B, WANG G M. Characteristics of decomposition and nutrient release of Vicia villosa under different returning methods in saline alkali land of the Yellow River Delta. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(12): 183-191. (in Chinese)
[46]	杨林生, 张宇亭, 杨柳青, 谢军, 杨敏, 张跃强, 石孝均. 不同氮钾水平对水稻干物质累积、转运及产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(4): 89-95.
	YANG L S, ZHANG Y T, YANG L Q, XIE J, YANG M, ZHANG Y Q, SHI X J. Effects of different nitrogen and potassium rates on dry matter accumulation, transport and yield of rice. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(4): 89-95. (in Chinese)
[47]	张均华, 刘建立, 张佳宝, 赵夫涛, 程亚南, 王伟鹏. 施氮量对稻麦干物质转运与氮肥利用的影响. 作物学报, 2010, 36(10): 1736-1742. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01736
	ZHANG J H, LIU J L, ZHANG J B, ZHAO F T, CHENG Y N, WANG W P. Effects of nitrogen application rates on translocation of dry matter and utilization of nitrogen in rice and wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(10): 1736-1742. (in Chinese)
[48]	李潮海, 刘奎, 周苏玫, 栾丽敏. 不同施肥条件下夏玉米光合对生理生态因子的响应. 作物学报, 2002, 28(2): 265-269.
	LI C H, LIU K, ZHOU S M, LUAN L M. Response of photosynthesis to eco-physiological factors of summer maize on different fertilizer amounts. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, 28(2): 265-269. (in Chinese)
[49]	WANG W, LI M Y, ZHOU R, MO F, KHAN A, BATOOL A, ZHANG W, LU J S, ZHU Y, WANG B Z, YANG Y M, WANG J, TAO X P, XIONG Y C. Leaf senescence, nitrogen remobilization, and productivity of maize in two semiarid intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 2023, 150: 126943.
[50]	KOSGEY J R, MOOT D J, FLETCHER A L, MCKENZIE B A. Dry matter accumulation and post-silking N economy of ‘stay-green’ maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. European Journal of Agronomy, 2013, 51: 43-52.
[51]	叶君, 高聚林, 于晓芳, 王志刚, 孙继颖, 李丽君. 施氮量对超高产春玉米花粒期叶片衰老及产量的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 32(3): 178-183.
	YE J, GAO J L, YU X F, WANG Z G, SUN J Y, LI L J. Effects of nitrogen amounts on senescence process in leaves and yield of super-high yield spring maize during flowering and heading period. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 32(3): 178-183. (in Chinese)
[52]	巨晓棠, 张翀. 论合理施氮的原则和指标. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(1): 1-13.
	JU X T, ZHANG C. The principles and indicators of rational N fertilization. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(1): 1-13. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

种植模式 Cropping pattern	氮肥用量 N rate （%）		2021						2022
种植模式 Cropping pattern	氮肥用量 N rate （%）		地上干物质量 SDB (kg·hm^-2)		氮含量 N content (g·kg^-1)		地上氮素积累量 NNA (kg·hm^-2)		地上干物质量 SDB (kg·hm^-2)	氮含量 N content (g·kg^-1)	地上氮素积累量 NNA (kg·hm^-2)
HV	0		2922.11±50.25a		23.30±0.30a		68.09±1.80a		4360.33±133.24d	24.37±0.64d	106.26±0.52d
	25		2952.37±128.55a		22.95±0.47a		67.76±3.88a		4793.05±103.34c	26.70±0.20c	127.98±3.34c
	50		2922.15±87.33a		23.70±0.45a		69.25±3.37a		5169.38±40.63b	27.87±0.40b	144.08±3.22b
	75		2958.56±165.09a		23.50±0.58a		69.53±4.75a		5331.88±20.84a	28.67±0.15a	152.85±0.43a
	100		2930.98±154.61a		23.35±0.36a		68.44±3.35a		5368.13±89.61a	28.77±0.47a	154.41±2.33a
FF	0		1726.33±24.58a		16.00±0.20a		27.62±0.66a		2244.67±59.65e	14.53±0.35e	32.61±0.39e
	25		1699.33±18.04a		16.27±0.25a		27.64±0.63a		2416.33±30.66d	15.73±0.31d	38.01±0.61d
	50		1704.00±130.15a		16.23±0.15a		27.67±2.28a		2545.33±63.22c	17.03±0.65c	43.38±2.70c
	75		1715.33±93.39a		16.27±0.12a		27.91±1.61a		2918.00±37.47b	18.57±0.42b	54.17±0.69b
	100		1709.67±26.54a		16.20±0.20a		27.69±0.37a		3157.00±146.81a	19.83±0.70a	62.62±3.90a
平均 Average
HV		2937.23±47.95a		23.36±0.11a		68.61±1.07a		5004.55±46.07a		27.27±0.20a	137.12±1.42a
FF		1710.93±50.40b		16.19±0.05b		27.70±0.80b		2656.27±46.44b		17.14±0.18b	46.16±1.56b

年份 Year	主处理 Main treatment	氮素投入量 Nitrogen input		最高产量玉米氮素吸收量 Nitrogen uptake of maize with highest yield			氮素盈余 Input-uptake of nitrogen
年份 Year	主处理 Main treatment	绿肥 Green manure	最佳施氮量 The optimal chemical nitrogen input	籽粒 Grian	秸秆 Straw	地上部 Above ground	氮素盈余 Input-uptake of nitrogen
2021	HV	112.95	229.04	87.51	30.77	118.28	223.71
2021	FF	72.03	270.00	83.40	26.98	110.38	231.65
2022	HV	187.55	199.17	148.94	69.09	218.03	168.69
2022	FF	114.76	248.07	126.78	67.22	194.00	168.83

Effects of Partial Replacement of Chemical Fertilizers with Green Manure on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield Formation of Maize

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 52

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2^# and Changbai7^# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	WANG YaFei, YAN Peng, XUE JinTao, DONG XueRui, MENG FanQi, GUO LiNa, LUO Yi, ZHANG Juan, DONG ZhiQiang, LU Lin. Effects of Ethephon-Glycine Betaine-Salicylic Acid Mixture on Root System Architecture, Physiological Function and Yield of Maize Under Heat Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1439-1455.
[3]	WANG YuPing, FU Zhi, SUN JiaYing, MU XiaoMeng, LIU HuiLin, GUO JinYun, SONG WenJing, HOU LeiPing, ZHAO HaiLiang. Evaluation of the Mitigating Effect and Application Efficacy of Melatonin Applied at the Seedling Stage on Short-Term Chilling Stress in Tomato Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[4]	WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[5]	ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[6]	HE JiHang, ZHANG Qing, LÜ XiangYue, XUE JiQuan, XU ShuTu, LIU JianChao. Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Stay-Green Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[7]	LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[8]	LI SiYuan, LI HongPing, CHANG HongQing, ZHANG SenYan, LI SiJia, CUI XinFei, QIAO Po, ZENG Bo, LIU GuiZhen, LIU TianXue, TANG JiHua, LI ChaoHai. Effects of Density Increase on Dynamic Change of Yield and Agronomic Traits of Maize Cultivars with Different Plant Heights [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 967-984.
[9]	DONG JinLong, ZHAO Ying, YU HaiBing, LÜ JianYe, QIN JiaQi, LIANG Chen, MING Bo, LI ShaoKun. Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[10]	HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[11]	GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[12]	YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[13]	YANG Rui, CHEN JingDong, HUANG Ying, XIE LingLi, ZHANG XueKun, ZHOU DengWen, LIU QingYun, XU JinSong, XU BenBo. Genetic Improvement and Configuration Analysis of High-Yield Rapeseed Lines in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 250-264.
[14]	CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[15]	CAI TingYang, ZHU YuPeng, LI RuiDong, WU ZongSheng, XU YiFan, SONG WenWen, XU CaiLong, WU CunXiang. Effects of Leaf-Cutting at Seedling Stage on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Pod Distribution and Yield Formation in Soybean in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.