Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (21): 4240-4253.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.21.005

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison on Morphological, Yield, and Quality Traits of Soybean Cultivars Developed in Different Years from Liaoning and Ohio

GUO Xiao-hong1, WANG Xing-cai2, MENG Tian1, ZHANG Hui-jun1, AO Xue1, WANG Hai-ying1, XIE Fu-ti1   

  1. 1Soybean Research Institute of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866
    2College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130
  • Received:2015-03-30 Online:2015-11-01 Published:2015-11-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The research compared the morphological, yield, and quality traits of soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars developed in different years from different breeding programs of Ohio, U.S.A. and Liaoning, China, which were at the same latitude. The purpose of this study was to reveal the evolutionary trend of the main agronomic traits, and the response to the fertilizer rate with the seed yield improvement.【Method】The field experiment was conducted in 2011, 2013, and 2014, and used a completely randomized design with three replications. The diammonium phosphate was applied as starter fertilizer, and had three levels (0, 150, and 300 kg·hm-2). The main agronomic traits, seed yield, and quality were measured at the mature stage.【Result】With the improvement of the soybean yield of Liaoning and Ohio cultivars, plant height, internode length, and lodging score decreased, harvest index increased; the branch and height of the lowest pod of Ohio cultivars increased, and that of Liaoning cultivars was decreased. The improvement of seeds per plant was the main reason for the yield increasing of Ohio cultivars, and the main factor for Liaoning cultivars was of a bigger 100-seed weight. In the process of cultivar development, the protein content of Ohio cultivars decreased, while the fat content increased; the protein content of Liaoning cultivars increased, and there was no significant changed in fat content. Compared with Liaoning cultivars during the same period, the plant height, internode length, and lodging score of Ohio cultivar decreased; and pods per plant, seeds per plant, harvest index, and yield increased; protein content decreased, and fat content increased. With the increment of the fertilizer rates, the plant height, internode length, and lodging score of the Ohio cultivar remained relatively stable, but that of Liaoning cultivars increased sharply; the yield of Ohio cultivars increased with the fertilizer rates, and the yield of Liaoning cultivars was highest at the medium fertilizer rate. The results of correlation and path-coefficient indicated that the yield was significant negatively correlated with plant height, internode length, and lodging score; while it was significant positively correlated with seeds per plant and harvest index, and plant height, seeds per plant, and harvest index had a greater direct effect to yield improvement.【Conclusion】During the improvement of the soybean yield of the Ohio and Liaoning cultivars, the plant height and internode length decreased, the lodging resistance and harvest index increased, but the improvement progress of the Ohio cultivars was greater than that of the Liaoning cultivars. The yield improvement of the Ohio cultivars was mainly attributed to the increment of seeds per plant, and that of Liaoning cultivars was a bigger 100-seed weight. The fertilizer tolerance of the Ohio cultivars was enhanced, and the plant height and lodging score kept stable by the fertilizer rates rising, but that of the Liaoning cultivars increased.

Key words: soybean, morphological trait, yield, quality, genetic improvement, fertilizer tolerance, China, USA

[1]    Ustun A, Allen F L, English B C. Genetic progress in soybean of the US Midsouth. Crop Science, 2001, 41(4): 993-998.
[2]    Specht J E, Hume D J, Kumudini S V. Soybean yield potential genetic and physiological perspective. Crop Science, 1999, 39(6): 1560-1570.
[3]    Voldeng H D, Cober E R, Hume D J, Gillard C, Morrison M J. Fifty-eight years of genetic improvement of short-season soybean cultivars. Crop Science, 1997, 37(2): 428-431.
[4]    Wilcox J R. Sixty years of improvement in publicly developed elite soybean lines. Crop Science, 2001, 41(6): 1711-1716.
[5]    Jin J, Liu X B, Wang G H, Mi L, Shen Z B, Chen X L, Herbert S J. Agronomic and physiological contributions to the yield improvement of soybean cultivars released from 1950 to 2006 in northeast China. Field Crop Research, 2010, 115(1): 116-123.
[6]    郑洪兵, 徐克章, 赵洪祥, 李大勇, 杨光宇, 刘武仁, 陆静梅. 吉林省大豆品种遗传改良过程中主要农艺性状的变化. 作物学报, 2008, 34(6): 1042-1050.
Zheng H B, Xu K Z, Zhao H X, Li D Y, Yang G Y, Liu W R, Lu J M. Changes of main agronomic traits with genetic improvement of soybean cultivars in Jilin province, China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(6): 1042-1050. (in Chinese)
[7]    孙贵荒, 宋书宏, 刘晓丽, 董丽杰, 孙恩玉, 张丽, 陈艳秋. 辽宁省大豆更替品种主要农艺性状研究. 大豆科学, 2001, 20(1): 30-34.
Sun G H, Song S H, Liu X L, Dong L J, Sun E Y, Zhang L, Chen Y Q. Study on alteration of main agronomic characters released soybean varieties in Liaoning. Soybean Science, 2001, 20(1): 30-34. (in Chinese)
[8]    王文斌, 孙贵荒, 孙恩玉. 辽宁省育成大豆品种蛋白质和脂肪含量的遗传改进的进展. 辽宁农业科学, 2001(3): 35-37.
Wang W B, Sun G H, Sun E Y. Genetic improvement of protein and oil content of soybean cultivars in Liaoning province. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2001(3): 35-37. (in Chinese)
[9]    成雪峰. 黄淮海地区大豆品种主要农艺性状演变分析, 大豆科学, 2011, 30(4): 585-588.
Cheng X F. Evolution of soybean major agronomy characters in Huang-Huai-Hai region. Soybean Sciences, 2011, 30(4): 585-588. (in Chinese)
[10]   严君, 韩晓增, 丁娇, 王影. 东北黑土区大豆生长、结瘤及产量对氮磷的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(2): 318-325.
Yan J, Han X Z, Ding J, Wang Y. Responses of growth nodulation and yield of soybean to different nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization management. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(2): 318-325. (in Chinese)
[11]   Taylor R S, Weaver D B, Wood C W. Nitrogen application increases yield and early dry matter accumulation in late-planted soybean. Crop Science, 2005, 45(3): 854-958.
[12]   田艳洪, 刘元英, 张文钊, 罗盛国. 不同时期施用氮肥对大豆根瘤固氮酶活性及产量的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2007, 39(5): 15-19.
Tian Y H, Liu Y Y, Zhang W Z, Luo S G. Effect of N fertilization at different stage on nitrogenase activity and yield of soybean. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2007, 39(5): 15-19. (in Chinese)
[13]   Osborne S L, Riedell W E. Starter nitrogen fertilizer impact on soybean yield and quality in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal, 2006, 98(6): 1569-1574.
[14]   董守坤, 龚振平, 祖伟. 氮素营养水平对大豆氮素积累及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(1): 65-70.
Dong S K, Gong Z P, Zu W. Effects of nitrogen nutrition levels on N-accumulation and yields of soybean. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(1): 65-70. (in Chinese)
[15]   张含彬, 任万军, 杨文钰. 氮肥处理下套作大豆根系建成与产量关系的研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2007, 2: 46-49.
Zhang H B, Ren W J, Yang W Y. Relationship between root characteristics and yield formation in relay planting soybean under the nitrogen application. Soil and Fertilizer Science in China, 2007, 2: 46-49. (in Chinese)
[16]   严君, 韩晓增. 盆栽条件下土壤无机氮浓度对大豆结瘤、固氮和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(10): 1929-1938.
Yan J, Han X Z. Effect of soil inorganic N concentrations on the nodulation, N2 fixation and yield in soybean in a pot experiment. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(10): 1929-1938. (in Chinese)
[17]   Chiezey U F, Odunze A C. Soybean response to application of poultry manure and phosphorus fertilizer in the Sub-humid Savanna of Nigeria. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment, 2009, 1(2): 25-31.
[18]   吴冬婷, 张晓雪, 龚振平, 马春梅, 张磊. 磷素营养对大豆磷素吸收及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(3): 670-677.
Wu D T, Zhang X X, Gong Z P, Ma C M, Zhang L. Effects of phosphorus nutrition on P absorption and yields of soybean. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2012, 18(3): 670-677. (in Chinese)
[19]   Gan Y B, Stolen I, Van Keulen H. Physiological changes in soybean wuyin9 in response to N and P nutrition. Annals of Applied Biology, 2002, 140(3): 319-329.
[20]   郑伟. 水、肥、密对黑龙江省不同年代育成大豆品种特性的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2014.
Zheng W. Effect of water, fertilizer and planting density on characteristics of soybean cultivars released in different years in Heilongjiang [D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[21]   Gizlice Z, Cater T E Jr, Gerig T M, Buron J W. Genetic base for North American public soybean cultivars released between 1947 and 1988. Crop Science, 1994, 34(5): 1143-1151.
[22]   Cui Z L, Carter T E Jr, Burton J W. Genetic base of 651 Chinese soybean cultivars released during 1923 to 1995. Crop Science, 2002, 40(5): 1470-1481.
[23]   Morrison M J, Voldeng H D, Cober E R. Agronomic changes from 58 years of genetic improvement of short-season soybean cultivars in Canada. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92(4): 780-784.
[24]   王金陵. 中国大豆主产区主要推广品种株型变化的回顾. 东北农学院学报, 1993, 24(3): 209-213.
Wang J L. Review on the change of soybean plant types of the main soybean producing regions in China. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 1993, 24(3): 209-213. (in Chinese)
[25]   游明安, 邱家驯, 盖钧镒, 刘佑斌. 大豆产量空间分布形成原因的探讨. 中国油料, 1995, 17(3): 13-16.
You M A, Qiu J X, Gai J Y, Liu Y B. Formation of space distribution of yield in soybean. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 1995, 17(3): 13-16. (in Chinese)
[26]   黄中文, 王伟, 徐新娟, 文自翔, 李海朝, 李金英, 卢为国. 大豆重组自交家系群体动态株高及其相对生长速率与产量的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37(3): 559-562.
Huang Z W, Wang W, Xu X J, Wen Z X, Li H C, Li J Y, Lu W G. Relationship of dynamic plant height and its relative growth rate with yield using recombinant inbred lines of soybean. Acta Agronmica Sinica, 2011, 37(3): 559-562. (in Chinese)
[27]   Cooper R L. Influence of soybean production practices on lodging and seed yield in highly productive environments. Agronomy Journal, 1971, 63(3): 490-493.
[28]   谢甫绨, 董钻, 王晓光, 孙艳环. 大豆倒伏对植株性状和产量的影响. 大豆科学, 1993, 12(1): 81-85.
Xie F T, Dong Z, Wang X G, Sun Y H. Effect of lodging on soybean yield formation. Soybean Sciences, 1993, 12(1): 81-85. (in Chinese)
[29]   杨庆凯, 桂明珠, 武天龙. 大豆品种抗倒伏能力与产量、植株形态、茎解剖性状的相关分析. 大豆科学, 1986, 5(2): 113-116.
Yang Q K, Gui M Z, Wu T L. An analysis about relationship of lodging to agronomic characters and stem anatomy in soybean. Soybean Science, 1986, 5(2): 113-116. (in Chinese)
[30]   Wilcox J R, Sediyama T. Interrelationships among height, lodging and yield in determinate and indeterminate soybean. Euphytica, 1981, 30(2): 323-326.
[31]   刘念析, 李穆, 李秀平, 杨伟光, 年海. 大豆主要农艺性状间的相关性分析. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(4): 570-572.
Liu N X, Li M, Li X P, Yang W G, Nian H. Correlation analysis of major agronomic traits in soybean. Soybean Science, 2013, 32(4): 570-572. (in Chinese)
[32]   Weber C R, Fehr W R. Seed yield losses from lodging combine harvesting in soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 1966, 58(3): 287-289.
[33]   Martin R J, Wilcox J R. Heritability of lowest pod height in soybean. Crop Science, 1973, 13(2): 201-203.
[34]   Board J. Light interception efficiency and light quality affect yield compensation of soybean at low plant populations. Crop Science, 2000, 40(5): 1285-1294.
[35]   Cox W J, Cherney J H, Shields E. Soybeans compensate at low seeding rates but not at high thinning rates. Agronomy Journal, 2010, 102(4): 1238-1243.
[36]   Boerma H R. Comparison of past and recently developed soybean cultivars in maturity groups VI, VII and VIII. Crop Science, 1979, 19(5): 611-613.
[37]   Egli D B. The role of seed in the determination of yield of grain crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006, 57(5): 1237-1247.
[38]   Sadras V O, Egli D B. Seed size variation in grain crops: Allometric relationships between rate and duration of seed growth. Crop Science, 2008, 48(2): 408-416.
[39]   Wilcox J R. Increasing seed protein in soybean with eight cycles of recurrent selection. Crop Science, 1998, 38(6): 1536-1540.
[40]   Wilcox J R, Cavins J F. Backcrossing high seed protein to a soybean cultivar. Crop Science, 1995, 35(4): 1036-1041.
[41]   Mikel M A, Diers B W, Nelson R L, Smith H H. Genetic diversity and agronomic improvement of North American soybean germplasm. Crop Science, 2010, 50(4): 1219-1229.
[42]   Sneller C H. Pedigree analysis of elite soybean lines. Crop Science, 1994, 34(6): 1515-1522.
[43]   Gizlice Z, Cater T E Jr, Gerig T M, Buron J W. Genetic diversity patterns in North American public soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage. Crop Science, 1996, 36(3): 753-765.
[44]   Kasha T J, Sneller C H, Diers B W. The relationship between genetic distance among parents and genetic variance in populations of soybean. Crop Science, 1997, 37(4): 1317-1325.
[45]   丁雪丽, 谢甫绨, 王海英, 王智权, 谢志涛, Steven St. Martin. 中美不同年代大豆品种农艺性状的比较. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006, 37(4): 565-568.
Ding X L, Xie F T, Wang H Y, Wang Z Q, Xie Z T, Steven St. Martin. Comparison of agronomic traits of soybean cultivars from America and China in different ages. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2006, 37(4): 565-568. (in Chinese)
[46]   王继安, 杨庆凯. 土壤肥力对大豆杂交后代选择效果的影响. 作物学报, 2001, 27(4): 460-464.
Wang J A, Yang Q K. Effects of soil fertility on selection of progenies of soybean crosses. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(4): 460-464. (in Chinese)
[1] PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2# and Changbai7# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2] YUAN HaoLiang, NIE Jun, LI Peng, LU YanHong, LIAO YuLin, XU ChangXu, LI ZhongYi, CAO WeiDong, ZHANG JiangLin. Effects of Co-Utilization of Chinese Milk Vetch and Rice Straw on Soil Phosphorus Composition and Phosphorus Activation of Paddy Field in Southern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1480-1491.
[3] WANG YuPing, FU Zhi, SUN JiaYing, MU XiaoMeng, LIU HuiLin, GUO JinYun, SONG WenJing, HOU LeiPing, ZHAO HaiLiang. Evaluation of the Mitigating Effect and Application Efficacy of Melatonin Applied at the Seedling Stage on Short-Term Chilling Stress in Tomato Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[4] ZHAO ZiJie, SONG Hao, DONG XiaoOu, WAN JianMin. Progress in Transposable Element-Assisted Targeted Insertion of Large DNA Fragments [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1141-1156.
[5] WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[6] ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[7] HE JiHang, ZHANG Qing, LÜ XiangYue, XUE JiQuan, XU ShuTu, LIU JianChao. Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Stay-Green Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[8] LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[9] YUE LiXin, WANG QingHua, WANG ZhenBao, NIMAQIONGJI, LIU ZeZhou, KONG SuPing, ZHANG LiFeng, GAO LiMin. Widely Targeted Metabolomics-Based Analysis of the Differences in Tibetan Bunching Onion and Chive on Nutritional Quality and Flavonoid Metabolites [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1070-1086.
[10] ZHANG LiDong, GUO YiCong, HUANG HongYu, NIE Jing, WANG Bing, LI MengYu, LI JiaWang, SUI XiaoLei, LI YuHe. Correlation Analysis of Cucumber Fruit Quality Integrating Sensory Evaluation with Nutritional Traits and Flavor Compound Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1087-1100.
[11] WANG ShaoHua, FAN QiuLi, YANG JinChang, SUN YuJie, YU Niu, JIANG ShouQun. Effects of Different Levels of Mytilaria laosensis Leaves Feeding on Growth Performance, Immune Function, Antioxidant Capacity, Carcass Quality and Meat Quality of Yellow-Feathered Chickens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1111-1127.
[12] DONG JinLong, ZHAO Ying, YU HaiBing, LÜ JianYe, QIN JiaQi, LIANG Chen, MING Bo, LI ShaoKun. Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[13] HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[14] GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[15] LIU FangDong, SUN Lei, WANG WuBin, ZHAO JinMing, GAI JunYi. Changes of Cropping System and Suggestions on Ecological Cultivation Regions of Soybeans in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 486-498.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!