Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (18): 4105-4120.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.18.012

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Grass Cover on Slope Runoff Process in Loess Areas of Northern Shaanxi, China

WANG Bo1(), CHEN Hao1,2(), QUAN BeiPing3, CHEN MingChuan1, JING XinRui1, XU JiaHao1, HUANG ChaoYi1, LI ZhanBin2   

  1. 1 College of Life Science, Yan′an University/Key Laboratory for Applied Ecology of the Loess Plateau (Shaanxi Province), Yan’an 716000, Shaanxi
    2 School of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering, Xi′an University of Technology, Xi′an 710048
    3 Yan’an University Library, Yan′an 716000, Shaanxi
  • Received:2025-11-24 Accepted:2026-02-09 Online:2026-09-16 Published:2026-09-20
  • Contact: CHEN Hao

Abstract:

【Objective】Grass cover plays a critical ecological role in regulating slope runoff during rainfall. However, quantitative studies on how root systems and soil properties change during grass cover restoration and subsequently affect slope runoff remain limited.【Method】In this study, indoor simulated rainfall experiments were conducted to systematically examine the effects of varying rainfall intensities (40, 80, and 120 mm·h-1) and grass cover levels (0%, 33%, 48%, 56%, and 69%) on surface runoff characteristics, soil physicochemical properties, root parameters, and their combined influence on slope runoff in ryegrass (Lolium perenne) plots (2 m×0.5 m×0.4 m, 15° slope).【Result】(1) Compared with bare slopes, grass cover restoration significantly improved the physicochemical properties of the surface soil (0-10 cm). Specifically, it led to a 2.4% decrease in soil bulk density and increases of 1.4%, 9.4%, 227.1% and 82.5% in total soil porosity, mean weight diameter of aggregates, saturated hydraulic conductivity, and soil organic matter content, respectively, with all improvements enhanced by increasing cover. Meanwhile, root parameters (root length density, root surface area density, and root volume density) of grass plots increased significantly with increasing cover. Regression analysis further indicated that grass root growth directly drove corresponding changes in topsoil properties, and the improvement in soil saturated hydraulic conductivity was the most significant. (2) Under the same rainfall intensity, the initial runoff time increased significantly with greater grass cover, while the average runoff rate decreased, with runoff reduction benefits increasing accordingly (7.7%, 13.3%, 16.9%, and 27.1%). With increasing rainfall intensity, the initial runoff time was markedly shortened, and the greater the grass coverage, the larger the reduction magnitude. Meanwhile, the average runoff rate rose significantly, accompanied by a decline in corresponding runoff reduction benefits (24.7%, 15.9%, and 8.1%); moreover, the weakening trend of the regulatory effect of grass cover on slope runoff with increasing rainfall intensity was particularly obvious at higher coverages (56% and 69%). (3) The changes in plant roots and soil physicochemical properties during grass restoration significantly influenced slope runoff processes. Path model analysis indicated that the direct effect of plant roots on runoff rate (standardized path coefficient: -0.60) was greater than the indirect effect (standardized path coefficient: -0.27). This was attributed to the fact that the increase in grass cover after restoration mainly regulates slope runoff through the physical barrier effect (direct effect) formed by root density, while its indirect effect was primarily achieved by improving topsoil hydro-physical properties and ultimately increasing soil saturated hydraulic conductivity, thereby enhancing water infiltration capacity.【Conclusion】This study revealed the regulatory effect of grass restoration on slope runoff processed by driving changes in topsoil properties through root growth, and this effect was the most significant under high grass coverage. These results provide a scientific basis for erosion control, grassland restoration, and management in the Loess Plateau region.

Key words: surface runoff, vegetation coverage, rainfall intensity, soil physico-chemical properties, ryegrass (Lolium perenne), root parameters, the Loess Plateau

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the testing device and layout of the ryegrass slope plots"

Fig. 2

Physico-chemical properties of surface soil (0-10 cm) in slope plots with different grass cover Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in grass cover (P<0.05). The same as below"

Fig. 3

Characteristics of root parameters of ryegrass slope plots with different grass cover"

Table 1

Response equations of soil physico-chemical properties to root parameters in ryegrass slope plots under different grass cover"

土壤理化性质
Soil physico-chemical property
根系参数
Root parameter
回归方程
Regression function
R2 P
容重
Bulk density
根长密度Root length density y=-0.014x+1.227 0.64 <0.01
根表面积密度Root surface area density y=-0.041x+1.227 0.61 <0.01
根体积密度Root volume density y=-1.417x+1.227 0.62 <0.01
总孔隙度
Total porosity
根长密度Root length density y=0.580x+47.734 0.35 0.07
根表面积密度Root surface area density y=1.799x+47.699 0.36 0.07
根体积密度Root volume density y=57.779x+47.750 0.32 0.09
有机质含量
Soil organic matter content
根长密度Root length density y=0.831x+1.224 0.56 <0.05
根表面积密度Root surface area density y=2.463x+1.245 0.53 <0.05
根体积密度Root volume density y=82.701x+1.248 0.51 <0.05
团聚体平均重量直径
Mean weight diameter of aggregates
根长密度Root length density y=0.011x+0.196 0.63 <0.01
根表面积密度Root surface area density y=0.032x+0.196 0.61 <0.01
根体积密度Root volume density y=1.055x+0.196 0.58 <0.05
饱和导水率
Saturated hydraulic conductivity, Ks
根长密度Root length density y=0.036x+0.031 0.88 <0.01
根表面积密度Root surface area density y=0.108x+0.031 0.88 <0.01
根体积密度Root volume density y=3.685x+0.030 0.88 <0.01

Table 2

Initial runoff generation time and delay rate of slope plots under different rainfall intensities and grass cover"

降雨强度
Rainfall intensity (mm·h-1)
初始产流时间Initial runoff time (min) 延迟率Delay rate (%)
0 33% 48% 56% 69% 33% 48% 56% 69%
40 1.61eA 2.61dA 3.60cA 4.22bA 7.14aA 62.1 123.6 162.1 343.5
80 0.71dB 0.96cB 1.09cB 1.31bB 2.10aB 35.2 53.5 84.5 195.8
120 0.61dC 0.82cB 0.91bB 0.94bB 1.39aC 34.4 49.2 54.1 127.9

Fig. 4

Runoff rate process of slope plots under different rainfall intensities and grass cover"

Fig. 5

Average runoff rate of slope plots under different rainfall intensities and grass cover Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in grass cover under the same rainfall intensity (P<0.05); Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences in rainfall intensity under the same grass cover (P<0.05)"

Fig. 6

Variation characteristics of runoff reduction benefit in ryegrass slope plots with grass cover and rainfall intensity"

Fig. 7

Correlation between runoff rate and soil physico-chemical and root parameters"

Fig. 8

Path model of grass cover, soil physico-chemical properties and root parameters on runoff rate in slope plots"

Fig. 9

Roots exposed on the surface after rain on the ryegrass slope plots (69% grass cover plot)"

[1]
李宗善, 杨磊, 王国梁, 侯建, 信忠保, 刘国华, 傅伯杰. 黄土高原水土流失治理现状、问题及对策[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7398-7409.
Li Z S, Yang L, Wang G L, Hou J, Xin Z B, Liu G H, Fu B J. The management of soil and water conservation in the Loess Plateau of China: Present situations, problems, and counter-solutions[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7398-7409. (in Chinese)
[2]
史志华, 宋长青. 土壤水蚀过程研究回顾[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(5): 1-10.
Shi Z H, Song C Q. Water erosion processes: A historical review[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(5): 1-10. (in Chinese)
[3]
王玉宽, 王占礼, 周佩华. 黄土高原坡面降雨产流过程的试验分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 1991, 5(2): 25-31.
Wang Y K, Wang Z L, Zhou P H. Experiment on rainfall-runoff process on slop of Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1991, 5(2): 25-31. (in Chinese)
[4]
马雪华. 森林水文学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1993: 206-211.
Ma X H. Forest Hydrology[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1993: 206-211. (in Chinese)
[5]
吴普特, 周佩华. 坡面薄层水流流动型态与侵蚀搬运方式的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 1992, 6(1): 19-24, 39.
Wu P T, Zhou P H. Research on the laminar flow type and erosion transportation manners on the slope surface[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1992, 6(1): 19-24, 39. (in Chinese)
[6]
马星, 郑江坤, 王文武, 陈鑫, 秦伟, 单志杰, 郎登潇, 廖峰. 不同雨型下紫色土区坡耕地产流产沙特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(2): 17-21.
Ma X, Zheng J K, Wang W W, Chen X, Qin W, Shan Z J, Lang D X, Liao F. Characteristics of the runoff and sediment yield of sloping farmland in the purple soil area under different rainfall patterns[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(2): 17-21. (in Chinese)
[7]
Fu X T, Zhang L P, Wang Y. Effect of slope length and rainfall intensity on runoff and erosion conversion from laboratory to field[J]. Water Resources, 2019, 46(4): 530-541.

doi: 10.1134/S0097807819040080
[8]
Shi P, Li P, Li Z B, Sun J M, Wang D J, Min Z Q. Effects of grass vegetation coverage and position on runoff and sediment yields on the slope of Loess Plateau, China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 259: 107231.

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107231
[9]
肖培青, 李艳霞, 苏广旭, 吕锡芝. 植被坡面产流特征及其侵蚀动力研究进展[J]. 人民黄河, 2016, 38(10): 115-118.
Xiao P Q, Li Y X, Su G X, X Z. Research progress and prospects for runoff generation and soil erosion dynamics under vegetation cover[J]. Yellow River, 2016, 38(10): 115-118. (in Chinese)
[10]
郭雨华, 赵廷宁, 孙保平, 丁国栋, 成晨, 胡封兵. 草地坡面水动力学特性及其阻延地表径流机制研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2006, 13(4): 264-267.
Guo Y H, Zhao T N, Sun B P, Ding G D, Cheng C, Hu F B. Study on the dynamic characteristics of overland flow and resistance to overland flow of grass slope[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 13(4): 264-267. (in Chinese)
[11]
王晶, 赵文武, 刘月, 贾立志. 植物功能性状对土壤保持的影响研究述评[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 3355-3364.
Wang J, Zhao W W, Liu Y, Jia L Z. Effects of plant functional traits on soil conservation: A review[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(9): 3355-3364. (in Chinese)
[12]
陈浩, 王博, 王豆豆, 樊浩, 李占斌. 混播草地不同部位对陕北黄土坡面侵蚀过程的调控效应[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(17): 8449-8464.
Chen H, Wang B, Wang D D, Fan H, Li Z B. Regulation effects of the roots, stems, and leaves of mixed grassland on erosion processes of loess slope in northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(17): 8449-8464. (in Chinese)
[13]
吴蕾, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 赵广举, 孙文义, 田鹏. 黄土高原地区植被盖度对产流产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(6): 133-138, 144.
Wu L, Mu X M, Gao P, Zhao G J, Sun W Y, Tian P. Effects of vegetation coverage on runoff and sediment yield in the Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(6): 133-138, 144. (in Chinese)
[14]
焦菊英, 王万忠. 人工草地在黄土高原水土保持中的减水减沙效益与有效盖度[J]. 草地学报, 2001(3): 176-182.

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2001.03.004
Jiao J Y, Wang W Z. The benefits of runoff and sediment reducing & effective cover rate for soil and water conservation of artificial grassland on Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2001(3): 176-182. (in Chinese)
[15]
韦红波, 李锐, 杨勤科. 我国植被水土保持功能研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(4): 489-496.
Wei H B, Li R, Yang Q K. Research advances of vegetation effect on soil and water conservation in China[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2002, 26(4): 489-496. (in Chinese)
[16]
Chen H, Zhang X P, Abla M, D, Yan R, Ren Q F, Ren Z Y, Yang Y H, Zhao W H, Lin P F, Liu B Y, Yang X H. Effects of vegetation and rainfall types on surface runoff and soil erosion on steep slopes on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2018, 170: 141-149.

doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.06.006
[17]
张光辉, 梁一民. 植被盖度对水土保持功效影响的研究综述[J]. 水土保持研究, 1996, 3(2): 104-110.
Zhang G H, Liang Y M. A summary of impact of vegetation coverage on soil and water conservation benefit[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1996, 3(2): 104-110. (in Chinese)
[18]
魏小燕, 毕华兴, 霍云梅, 肖聪颖, 杨晓琪. 高羊茅草地地表径流系数影响因素研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(5): 82-88.
Wei X Y, Bi H X, Huo Y M, Xiao C Y, Yang X Q. Study on the factors influencing surface runoff coefficient in Festuca arundinacea grassland[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(5): 82-88. (in Chinese)
[19]
陈戎欣, 吕锡芝, 倪用鑫, 魏义长. 人工降雨下草被对黄土丘陵沟壑区坡面径流的调控及临界阈值[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(1): 122-128.

doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.01.014
Chen R X, X Z, Ni Y X, Wei Y C. Regulation and critical threshold of grass cover on slope runoff in loess hilly Gully Region under artificial rainfall[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences, 2020, 29(1): 122-128. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.01.014
[20]
董月群, 李淑芹, 原翠萍, 雷廷武. 黑麦草对黄土坡面降雨产流产沙过程的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2011, 16(4): 67-73.
Dong Y Q, Li S Q, Yuan C P, Lei T W. Impacts of rye grasses on runoff and sedimentation processes from loess slopes[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2011, 16(4): 67-73. (in Chinese)
[21]
甘卓亭, 叶佳, 周旗, 周正朝, 上官周平. 模拟降雨下草地植被调控坡面土壤侵蚀过程[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(9): 2387-2396.
Gan Z T, Ye J, Zhou Q, Zhou Z C, Shangguan Z P. Effects of grass vegetations on the processes of soil erosion over slope lands in simulated rainfalls[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(9): 2387-2396. (in Chinese)
[22]
陈浩, 王豆豆, 崔钦凯, 王博, 刘俊娥, 李占斌. 草地植被冠层与根系对黄土坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(15): 6841-6853.
Chen H, Wang D D, Cui Q K, Wang B, Liu J E, Li Z B. Effects of canopy and root of grassland vegetation on erosion processes of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(15): 6841-6853. (in Chinese)
[23]
Wang D D, Wang Z L, Zhang Q W, Zhang Q L, Tian N L, Liu J E. Sheet erosion rates and erosion control on steep rangelands in loess regions[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2018, 43(14): 2926-2934.

doi: 10.1002/esp.v43.14
[24]
周佩华, 王占礼. 黄土高原土壤侵蚀暴雨标准[J]. 水土保持通报, 1987, 7(1): 38-44.
Zhou P H, Wang Z L. Soil erosion storm rainfall standard in the Loess Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1987, 7(1): 38-44. (in Chinese)
[25]
Wang J F, Yang Y F, Liu G B, Wang B, Zhang F B, Fang N F. Investigating the effects of herbaceous root systems on the soil detachment process at the species level[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 859: 160196.

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160196
[26]
刘芳, 王佩佩, 曹玉莹, 刘俊娥, 周正朝. 黄土高原典型草本植物根系分布特征及其对土壤理化性质的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2024, 33(10): 1-13.

doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023446
Liu F, Wang P P, Cao Y Y, Liu J E, Zhou Z C. Root distribution characteristics of typical herbaceous plants and their effects on soil physicochemical properties on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(10): 1-13. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023446
[27]
Zhou J, Fu B J, Gao G Y, Y H, Liu Y, N, Wang S. Effects of precipitation and restoration vegetation on soil erosion in a semi-arid environment in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Catena, 2016, 137: 1-11.

doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.08.015
[28]
张琪琳, 王占礼, 王栋栋, 刘俊娥. 黄土高原草地植被对土壤侵蚀影响研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(10): 1093-1101.

doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2017.10.1093
Zhang Q L, Wang Z L, Wang D D, Liu J E. Advances in researches of the effects of grassland vegetation on soil erosion in Loess Plateau[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(10): 1093-1101. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2017.10.1093
[29]
戴金梅, 查轩, 黄少燕, 陈世发, 翟少华, 王丽园, 刘川. 不同植被覆盖度对紫色土坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3): 33-38.
Dai J M, Zha X, Huang S Y, Chen S F, Zhai S H, Wang L Y, Liu C. Effects of slope gradients on erosion under different vegetation coverage on purple slopes[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(3): 33-38. (in Chinese)
[30]
张思毅, 梁志权, 谢真越, 卓慕宁, 郭太龙, 廖义善, 韦高玲, 李定强. 白三叶不同部位减沙效应及其对径流水动力学参数的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(8): 1306-1314.

doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2016.08.008
Zhang S Y, Liang Z Q, Xie Z Y, Zhuo M N, Guo T L, Liao Y S, Wei G L, Li D Q. Effects of different parts of Trifolium repens L. on sediment reduction and runoff hydrodynamic parameters[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25(8): 1306-1314. (in Chinese)
[31]
李建明, 陈兰, 任洪玉, 孙蓓, 杨贺菲, 熊怡, 孙宝洋. 工程堆积体产流产沙及水沙效益对植被近地表特征的响应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2024, 40(7): 142-151.
Li J M, Chen L, Ren H Y, Sun B, Yang H F, Xiong Y, Sun B Y. Response of runoff and sediment production and sediment and water benefits of engineering spoil heaps to vegetation characteristics[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2024, 40(7): 142-151. (in Chinese)
[32]
常松涛, 黄少燕, 查轩, 姚冲, 陈世发, 白永会, 王丽园, 孙丽丽. 雨强和植被覆盖度对红壤坡面产流产沙的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(3): 58-63.
Chang S T, Huang S Y, Zha X, Yao C, Chen S F, Bai Y H, Wang L Y, Sun L L. Effects of rainfall intensity and vegetation coverage on runoff and sediment yield on red soil slope[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(3): 58-63. (in Chinese)
[33]
Hou G R, Bi H X, Huo Y M, Wei X Y, Zhu Y J, Wang X X, Liao W C. Determining the optimal vegetation coverage for controlling soil erosion in Cynodon dactylon grassland in North China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 244: 118771.

doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118771
[34]
Zhang Q F, X Z, Ni Y X, Ma L, Wang J W. Slope runoff process and regulation threshold under the dual effects of rainfall and vegetation in loess hilly and Gully Region[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(9): 7582.

doi: 10.3390/su15097582
[35]
朱冰冰, 李占斌, 李鹏, 游珍. 草本植被覆盖对坡面降雨径流侵蚀影响的试验研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(3): 401-407.
Zhu B B, Li Z B, Li P, You Z. Effect of grass coverage on sediment yield of rain on slope[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(3): 401-407. (in Chinese)
[36]
李毅, 邵明安. 人工草地覆盖条件下降雨入渗影响因素的实验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(3): 18-23.
Li Y, Shao M A. Experimental study on influence factors of rainfall and infiltration under artificial grassland coverage[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(3): 18-23. (in Chinese)
[37]
Hao H X, Cheng L, Guo Z L, Wang L, Shi Z H. Plant community characteristics and functional traits as drivers of soil erodibility mitigation along a land degradation gradient[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2020, 31(14): 1851-1863.

doi: 10.1002/ldr.v31.14
[38]
孙佳美, 余新晓, 樊登星. 模拟降雨条件下黑麦草对土壤水分入渗的影响[J]. 土壤, 2014, 46(6): 1115-1120.
Sun J M, Yu X X, Fan D X. Effects of ryegrass on processes of soil infiltration under simulated rainfall[J]. Soils, 2014, 46(6): 1115-1120. (in Chinese)
[39]
熊燕梅, 夏汉平, 李志安, 蔡锡安. 植物根系固坡抗蚀的效应与机理研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(4): 895-904.
Xiong Y M, Xia H P, Li Z A, Cai X A. Effects and mechanisms of plant roots on slope reinforcement and soil erosion resistance: A research review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(4): 895-904. (in Chinese)
[40]
Guan N, Bi H X, Song Y L, Lu S H, Lin D D, Han J D. Influence of roots on soil preferential paths for infiltration in typical vegetation of the Loess Plateau[J]. Catena, 2025, 257: 109189.

doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2025.109189
[41]
王文鑫, 王文龙, 郭明明, 王天超, 康宏亮, 杨波, 赵满, 陈卓鑫. 黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对沟头土壤团聚体特征及土壤可蚀性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(16): 2845-2857. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.16.010.
Wang W X, Wang W L, Guo M M, Wang T C, Kang H L, Yang B, Zhao M, Chen Z X. Effects of natural vegetation restoration on characteristics of soil aggregate and soil erodibility of gully heads in Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(16): 2845-2857. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.16.010. (in Chinese)
[42]
娄义宝, 康宏亮, 王文龙, 沙小燕, 冯兰茜, 聂慧莹, 史倩华. 黄土高原沟壑区沟头植被根系垂直分布及其对土壤抗侵蚀性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 90-103. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.01.007.
Lou Y B, Kang H L, Wang W L, Sha X Y, Feng L Q, Nie H Y, Shi Q H. Vertical distribution of vegetation roots and its influence on soil erosion resistance of gully heads on the gullied Loess Plateau[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 90-103. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.01.007. (in Chinese)
[43]
马雪燕, 穆兴民, 王双银, 白云岗, 牛芳鹏. 黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对土壤入渗及产流的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(6): 89-96, 104.
Ma X Y, Mu X M, Wang S Y, Bai Y G, Niu F P. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil infiltration and runoff in the Gully Regions on the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 38(6): 89-96, 104. (in Chinese)
[44]
Li J M, Li L, Wang Z G, Zhang C W, Wang Y F, Wang W L, Zhang G H, Huang J Q, Li H, X D, Pu J, Liu J G. The contributions of the roots, stems, and leaves of three grass species to water erosion reduction on spoil heaps[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 603: 127003.

doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127003
[1] YE MengXue, WANG YiLun, ZHANG Qian, ZENG Chong, WU XuePing, WU HuiJun, TIAN WenZhong, LÜ JunJie, LI JunHong, MIAO YuHong, ZHENG FengJun. Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization and Its Influencing Factors Under Long-Term Conservation Tillage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(10): 2181-2193.
[2] ZHONG JinPing, ZHENG ZiCheng, LI TingXuan, HE XiaoLing. Effect of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Rates on the Loss of Colloidal Phosphorus on Purple Soil Slopes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(8): 1547-1559.
[3] LU KeDan, LU Yuan, WANG Rui, DANG TingHui. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Patterns on Yield and Nitrous Oxide Emission of Spring Maize in Dryland Farming of the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(18): 3642-3653.
[4] YAO YiWen,DAI QuanHou,GAN YiXian,GAO RuXue,YAN YouJin,WANG YuHong. Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Underground Hole (Fracture) Gap on Nutrient Loss in Karst Sloping Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(1): 140-151.
[5] WANG WenXin,WANG WenLong,GUO MingMing,WANG TianChao,KANG HongLiang,YANG Bo,ZHAO Man,CHEN ZhuoXin. Effects of Natural Vegetation Restoration on Characteristics of Soil Aggregate and Soil Erodibility of Gully Heads in Gully Region of the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(16): 2845-2857.
[6] FENG XiaoJie, ZHENG ZiCheng, LI TingXuan, FAN Li. Characteristics of Nitrogen Loss in Sloping Cropland of Purple Soil During Maize Growth Stage Under Rainstorm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(4): 738-749.
[7] LIU XianFeng, HU BaoYi, REN ZhiYuan. Spatiotemporal Variation of Water Use Efficiency and Its Driving Forces on the Loess Plateau During 2000-2014 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(2): 302-314.
[8] LI Tong, WANG ZiTing, LIU Lu, LIAO YunCheng, LIU Yang, HAN Juan. Effect of Conservation Tillage Practices on Soil Microbial Spatial Distribution and Soil Physico-Chemical Properties of the Northwest Dryland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(5): 859-870.
[9] LI Qiang, ZHANG Chong, REN Zhi-yuan. Analysis of Temporal and Spatial Variation of Vegetation Phenology in the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(22): 4352-4365.
[10] LIANG Xin-lan, ZHAO Long-shan, WU Jia, WU Fa-qi. Effects of Different Tillage Treatments and Rainfall Intensities on Soil Surface Roughness Under Simulated Condition [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(24): 4840-4849.
[11] LIU Xian-Feng, REN Zhi-Yuan. Vegetation Coverage Change and Its Relationship with Climate Factors in Northwest China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(10): 1954-1963.
[12] DANG Ya-Ai, WANG Guo-Dong, LI Shi-Qing. The Changing Characteristics of Profile Distribution of Soil Organic Nitrogen Component of the Typical Soil Types on the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(24): 5021-5030.
[13]
LIN Dai-jie; ZHENG Zi-cheng;; ZHANG Xi-zhou; LI Ting-xuan; WANG Yong-dong
. Study on the Effect of Maize Plants on Rainfall Redistribution Processes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(12): 2608-2615 .
[14]

. Release and Transport Characters of Soil Solutes on Loess Slope in Interval Rain Events
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(4): 1299-1305 .
[15] . Impact of Grain for Green Project to nature and society in north Shaanxi of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(5): 972-979 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!