Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12): 2384-2394.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.12.011

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Accumulation Characteristics of Cadmium by Rice Cultivars in Soils and Its Species Sensitivity Distribution

 SUN  Cong, CHEN  Shi-Bao, SONG  Wen-恩, LI  Ning   

  1. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ National Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Effects Long-Term Monitoring Network, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2013-10-24 Online:2014-06-15 Published:2014-01-17

Abstract: 【Objective】Understanding of the accumulation characteristics of Cadmium by different rice cultivars in soils and its species sensitivity distribution is necessary for determination of the hazardous concentration of Cd to rice cultivars of 5% of the tested species (HC5), the threshold values (HC5) of Cd to rice species will provide vital information for protection of Cd pollution to different rice cultivars and thereafter the food chains in China.【Method】Two typical paddy soils were collected from southern China, and the soils were polluted by Cd with different Cd addition levels of 0, 1.2, 4.8, 10, 40, and 120 mg•kg-1 in soils. Eighteen different rice cultivars from the main rice producing areas around China were selected for test plant species in this study. The biomass of the rice cultivars, the Cd concentrations in plants and thereafter the bioconcentration factor (BCFs) were investigated using pot experiments in green houses. The log-logistic distribution model was used to determinate the dose-response relationship of Cd toxicity to rice cultivars based on different endpoints. The response relationships of Cd toxicity to18 different rice species were fitted by cumulative probability distribution functions Log-logistic distribution model. The species sensitivity distributions (SSD) of Cd to rice was performed with the Burr-III type distribution model, and the different species sensitivity distribution of Cd toxicity frequency and 95% of rice varieties based on the protection of Cd toxicity thresholds HC5 were obtained and meanwhile, the quantitative relationship of BCFs with the bioavailability of Cd in soils was also determined in this study.【Result】 The biomass of different rice species decreased with the increasing concentrations of Cd in acidic soil from Qiyang, biomass of rice X-42 which was the most sensitive species to Cd stress decreased by 86%, but the biomass of rice Z-120 showed stronger tolerance to Cd stress decreased by 51%. When added at a concentration of 4.8 mg•kg-1, the biomasses of JY-253, J-463, Z-611, J-899, T-15, X-6, T-167 reached the maximum, and the others were at the concentration of 1.2 mg•kg-1. Compared with Cd0, the biomass of different varieties of rice increased by 4%-56%. This showed the stimulating effect of relatively lower level of Cd on rice growth. In alkaline soils from Guangzhou, there was no significant difference in the biomass of different rice species with increasing concentrations of Cd. The biologic concentration factor (BCFs) of Cd to rice species decreased with the increased spiked levels of Cd in both soils. In the low-Cd concentration (1.2 mg•kg-1), BCF in the red soil ranged between 0.0056 (S-974)-0.0133 (T-15), 2.38-fold difference; but in the paddy soil, the range of variation between 0.0018 (L-42, LY-28) -0.0034 (J-899), 1.89-fold difference. However, the BCFs of rice in Qiyang soil was higher than in Guangzhou soil under the same Cd level 2-14 times difference. This may be related to the nature of the soil. Qiyang red soil is an acidic soil, organic matter scarce, highly effective state of the measured Cd contention, and strong poisoned rice, reduced the multi-biomass. On the contrary, Guangzhou paddy soil which is high in pH and more organic matter, increased Cd absorption capacity and holding power, weakening poison rice biomass did not change significantly. Rice X-45 had the highest Cd toxicity threshold concentration (EC50, mg•kg-1), while rice X-42 had the lowest EC50. The EC50 of 18 rice species ranged from 4.30-61.611 mg•kg-1, with the variations differed from 1.0 to 14.32 folds.【Conclusion】Significant differences of response of rice cultivars to Cd stress were observed among the tested rice plant species, and hormesis effect of Cd stress to rice cultivars was also observed in this study although Cd was not included in the nutrients for rice plants. The results indicated that distinct difference existed among the tested rice species according to the accumulation of Burr-III type distribution model, e.g. the result showed that rice X-42 was the most sensitive species to Cd stress with the minimum toxicity threshold among the rice cultivars, on the contrary, rice X-45 showed a strong tolerance to Cd stress in soils. The maximum concentration of half (50%) inhibiting concentration of Cd to rice cultivars with protection of the 95% rice species (HC550%) was 4.93mg•kg-1 as determined by Burr-III model.

Key words: Burr-III model , cadmium , rice cultivars , species sensitivity distributions (SSD) , ecological risk

[1]中国环境保护部. 《国家重金属污染综合防治“十二五”规划》, 2011, 2.

China's Environmental Protection Department. Comprehensive prevention and control of heavy metal pollution in the national Twelfth Five Year Plan. 2011, 2. (in Chinese)

[2]龚伟群, 潘根兴. 中国水稻生产中Cd吸收及其健康风险的有关问题. 科技导报, 2006, 24(5): 43-48.

Gong W Q, Pan G X. Issues of grain Cd uptake and the potential health risk of rice production sector of China. Science & Technology Review, 2006, 24(5): 43-48. (in Chinese)

[3]李鑫. 土壤重金属污染防治法律制度研究[D]. 山西: 山西财经大学, 2012.

Li X. Researchon legal system of soil contamination prevention and control[D]. Shanxi: Shanxi University of Finance     &Economics, 2012. (in Chinese)

[4]张良运, 李恋卿, 潘根兴. 南方典型产地大米Cd、Zn 、Se 含量变异及其健康风险探讨. 环境科学, 2009, 30(9): 2792-2797.

Zhang Y L, Li L Q, Pan G X. Variation of Cd, Zn and Se contents of polished rice and the potential health risk for subsistence-diet farmers from typical areas of south China. Chiness Jouenal of Environmental Science, 2009, 30(9): 2792-2797. (in Chinese)

[5]王国庆, 骆永明, 宋静, 夏家淇. 土壤环境质量指导值与标准研究: I 国际动态及中国的修订考虑. 土壤学报, 2005, 42(4) : 666-673.

Wang G Q, Luo Y M, Song J, Xia J Q. Study on soil environmental quality guidelines and standards I. International trend and suggestions for amendment in China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005, 42(4): 666-673. (in Chinese)

[6]Wang M Y, Chen A K, Wong M H, Cheng H, Qiu R L. Cadmium accumulation in and tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties with different rates of radial oxygen loss. Environmental Pollution, 2011, 159(6): 1730-1736.

[7]Yu H, Wang J L, Fang W, Yuan J, Yang Z. Cadmium accumulation in different rice cultivars and screening for pollution-safe cultivars of rice. Science of the Total Environment , 2006, 370(2-3): 302-309.

[8]Yang Q W, Lan C Y, Wang H B, Zhang P. Cadmium in soil–rice system and health risk associated with the use of untreated mining wastewater for irrigation in Lechang. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 84(1-2): 147-152.

[9]Yoshihara T, Fumiyuki G, Kazuhiro S. Cross relationships of Cu, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cd accumulations in common japonica and indica rice cultivars in Japan. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2010, 68(2): 180-187.

[10]周启星, 魏树和, 刁春燕. 污染土壤生态修复基本原理及研究进展. 农业环境科学学报, 2007, 26(2): 419- 424.

Zhou Q X, Wei S H, Diao C Y. Basic principles and researching progresses in ecological remediation of contaminated soils. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2007, 26(2): 419-424. (in Chinese)

[11]骆永明. 污染土壤修复技术研究现状与趋势. 化学进展, 2009, 21(2/3): 558-565.

Luo Y M. Current research and development in soil remediation technologies. Progress in Chemistry, 2009, 21(2/3): 558-565. (in Chinese)

[12]Cai Y, Cao F B, Wei K, Zhang G, Wu F. Genotypic dependent effect of exogenous glutathione on Cd-induced changes in proteins, ultra structure and antioxidant defense enzymes in rice seedlings. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192(2): 1056-1066.

[13]Mohamed A J, Chen J H, Zhen F R, Zhang G P. Effect of different N fertilizer forms on antioxidant capacity and grain yield of rice growing under Cd stress. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 162(2/3): 1081-1085.

[14]Hua L F, Mc Bride M B, Cheng H, Wu J, Shi J, Xu J, Wu L. Root-induced changes to cadmium speciation in the rhizosphere of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Environmental Research, 2011, 111(3): 356-361.

[15]Granta C A, Clarke J M, Duguid S. Selection and breeding of plant cultivars to minimize cadmium accumulation: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 390(2/3): 301-310.

[16]Singh B R, Narwal R P, Jeng A S, Almas A. Crop uptake and extractability of cadmium of cadmium in soils naturally high in metals at different pH levels. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2005, 26(13): 2133-2142.

[17]雷炳莉, 黄圣彪, 王子健. 生态风险评价理论和方法. 化学进展, 2009, 21(2/3): 350-358.

Lei B L, Huang S B, Wang Z J. Theories and methods of ecological risk assessment. Progress in Chemistry, 2009, 21(2/3): 350-358. (in Chinese)

[18]黄圣彪, 王子健, 乔敏. 区域环境风险评价及其关键科学问题. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(5): 705-713.

Huang S B, Wang Z J, Qiao M. Ecological risk assessment (ERA) at the regional scale. Acta Scientiae Circumtantiae, 2007, 27(5): 705-713. (in Chinese)

[19]赵勇, 李红娟, 魏婷婷, 孙志强. 土壤、蔬菜的铅污染相关性分析及土壤铅污染阈限值研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(4): 843-847.

Zhao Y, Li H J, Wei T T, Sun Z Q. Relationship between soil Pb pollution and Pb contents in vegetables and pollution threshold of soil Pb. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(4): 843-847. (in Chinese)

[20]王印, 王军军, 秦宁, 吴文婧, 朱樱, 徐福留. 应用物种敏感性分布评估DDT和林丹对淡水生物的生态风险. 环境科学学报, 2009, 29(11): 2407-2414.

Wang Y, Wang J J, Qin N, Wu W J, Zhu Y, Xu F L. Assessing ecological risks of DDT and lindane to freshwater organisms by species sensitivity distributions. Acta Scientiae Circumtantiae, 2009, 29(11): 2407-2414. (in Chinese)

[21]Wheeler J R, Grist E P M, Leung K M Y, Morritt D, Crane M. Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2002, 45(11): 192-202.

[22]鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.

Lu R K. Analytical Methods of Soil and Agricultural Chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Scientech Press, 2000.

[23]Smith C J, Hopmans P, Cook F J. Accumulation of Cr, Pb, Cu, Ni, Zn and Cd in soil following irrigation with treated urban effluent in Australia. Environmental Pollution,1996, 94(3): 317-323.

[24]Posthuma L, Traas T P, Suter G W. General introduction to species sensitivity distributions//Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. Boca Raton, FLorida, USA: Lewis, 2002: 3-9. 

[25]郭广慧, 吴丰昌, 何宏平, 冯承莲, 李会仙, 张瑞卿, 赵晓丽, 廖海清. 中国主要水体DDT生态风险的初步评价. 环境科学学报, 2011, 31(11): 2545-2555.

Guo G H, Wu F C, He H P, Feng C Q, Li H X, Zhang R Q, Zhao X L, Liao H Q. Preliminary ecological risk assessment of DDT in surface waters of China. Acta Scientiae Circumtantiae, 2011, 31(11): 2545-2555. (in Chinese)

[26]魏威, 梁东丽, 陈世宝. 土壤中外源锌对不同植物毒性的敏感性分布. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(3): 538-543.

Wei W, Liang D L, Chen S B. Plant species sensitivity distribution to the phytotoxicity of soil exogenous zinc. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(3): 538-543. (in Chinese)

[27]胡莹, 黄益宗, 段桂兰, 刘云霞. 镉对不同生态型水稻的毒性及其在水稻体内迁移转运. 生态毒理学报, 2012, 6(7): 664-670.

Hu Y, Huang Y Z, Duan G L, Liu Y X. Cadmium toxicity and its translocation in two ecotype rice cultivars. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2012, 6(7): 664-670. (in Chinese)

[28]曾翔. 水稻镉积累和耐性机理及其品种间差异研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2006.

Zeng X. Studies on physiological mechanism in cadmium accumulation and tolerance and its difference among genotypic of rice[D]. Changsha: Agricultural University of Hunan, 2006. (in Chinese)

[29]邵国胜. 水稻镉耐性和积累的基因型差异与机理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2005.

Shao G S. Genotypic differences in cadmium tolerance and accumulation in rice and its mechanisms[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang      University, 2005. (in Chinese)

[30]王凯荣. 镉对不同基因型水稻生长毒害影响的比较研究. 农村生态环境, 1996, 12(3): 18-23.

Wang K R. Comparative study on Cd phytotoxieity to diflerent genes of riee. Rural Ecology Environment, 1996, 12(3): 18-23. (in Chinese)

[31]Fornazir R F, Ferreira R R, Vitoria A P, Molina S M G, Lea P J, Azevedo R A. Effect of cadmium on antioxidant enzyme activities in sugar cane. Plant Biology, 2002, 45(1): 91-97.

[32]Liang Y C, Chen Q, Liu Q, Zhang W, Ding R. Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) . Journal of Plant Physiology, 2003, 160: 1157-1164.

[33]史静, 潘根兴, 夏运生, 张仕颖, 张乃明. 镉胁迫对两品种水稻生长及抗氧化酶系统的影响. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(5): 832-837.

Shi J, Pan G X, Xia Y S, Zhang S Y, Zhang N M. Effects of Cd on different rice growth and antioxidant enzyme system. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 22(5): 832-837. (in Chinese)

[34]郭雪雁, 马义兵, 李波. 陆地生态系统中低剂量毒物刺激作用及拟合模型研究进展. 生态学报, 2009, 29(8): 4409-4419.

Guo X Y, Ma Y B, Li B. Advances in the effects, mechanisms and modeling of hormesis in terrestrial ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(8): 4409-4419. (in Chinese)

[35]Calabrese E J, Baldwin L A. Defining hormesis. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 2002, 21(2): 91-97.

[36]Wright D A, Welbourn P. Environmental Toxicology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

[37]Calabrese E J. Hormesis: a revolution in toxicology, risk assessment and medicine. EMBO Reports, 2004, 5(Suppl 1): S37-S40.

[38]Calabrese E J, Baldwin L A. Hormesis: U-shaped dose-responses and their centrality in toxicology. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 2001, 22(6): 285-290.

[39]Stebbing A R D. Hormesis-the stimulation of growth by low level of inhibitors. The Science of the Total Environment, 1982, 22(3): 213-234.

[40]Calabrese E J, Baldwin L A. The marginalization of hormesis. Toxicologic Pathology, 1999, 27(2): 187-194.

[41]Welshons W V, Thayer K A, Judy B M, Taylor J A, Curran E M, Saal F S. Large effects from small exposures. Ⅰ. Mechanisms for endocrine- disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2003, 111(8): 994-1006.

[42]Calabrese E J, Baldwin L A. Chemical hormesis: its historical foundations as a biological hypothesis. Toxicologic Pathology, 1999, 27(2): 195-216.

[43]Li Z W, Li L Q, Pan G X, Che J. Bioavailability of Cd in a soil–rice system in China: Soil type versus genotype effects. Plant and Soil, 2005, 271(1): 165-173.

[44]江水英, 肖化云, 吴声东. 影响土壤中镉的植物有效性的因素及镉污染土壤的植物修复. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008, 2(2): 6-10.

Jiang S Y, Xiao H Y, Wu S D. Effects of factors on Cd bioavailability in soil and the phytoremediation of the Cd-contaminated soil. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2008, 2(2): 6-10. (in Chinese)

[45]许丹, 马琳, 董岁明, 吴书凤, 师东. 土壤对重金属 Cu(Ⅱ)、Cd(Ⅱ)的吸附研究. 应用化工, 2013, 8(42): 1379-1391.

Xu D, Ma L, Dong S M, Wu S F, Shi D. Study of the adsorption of copper and cadmium in soil. Applied Chemical Industry, 2013, 8(42): 1379-1391. (in Chinese)

[46]Temminghoff E J M, van der Zee S E A T M, de Haan F A M. Copper mobility in a copper-contaminated sandy soil as affected by pH and solid and dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 1997, 31(4): 1109-1115.

[47]Adhikari T, Singh M V. Sorption characteristics of lead and cadmium in some soils of India. Geoderma, 2003, 114(1/2): 81-92.

[48]Spark K M, Johnson B B, Wells J D. Characterizing heavy metal ad-sorption on oxides and oxyhydroxides. European Journal of Soil Science, 1995, 46(4): 621-631.

[49]廖敏, 黄昌勇, 谢正苗. pH 对镉在土水系统中的迁移和形态的影响. 环境科学学报, 1999, 19(1): 81-86.

Liao M, Huang C Y, Xie Z M. Effect of pH on transport and transformation of cadmium in soil water system. Acta Scientiae Circumtantiae, 1999, 19(1): 81-86. (in Chinese)

[50]叶新新, 孙波. 品种和土壤对水稻镉吸收的影响及镉生物有效性预测模型研究进展. 土壤, 2012, 44(3): 360-365.

Ye X X, Sun B. Reviews on the effects of rice cultivars and soil types on Cd absorption and prediction model for Cd bioavailability. Soils, 2012, 44 (3): 360-365. (in Chinese)

[51]林大松, 徐应明, 孙国红, 戴晓华. 土壤 pH、有机质和含水氧化物对镉、铅竞争吸附的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2007, 26(2): 510-515.

Lin D S, Xu Y M, Sun G H, Dai X H. Effects of pH, organic matter and hydrous oxides on competitive adsorption of Cd2+and Pb2+by soil. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2007, 26(2): 510-515. (in Chinese)

[52]熊东. 川西山地老冲积黄壤微团聚体对Cd2+吸附解吸特性研究[D]. 四川: 四川农业大学, 2012.

Xiong D. Study of characters on Cd adsorption and desorption by microaggregates from old alluvial yellow soil in mountain regions of western Sichuan[D]. Sichuan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese)

[53]王小庆, 韦东普, 黄占斌, 马义兵. 物种敏感性分布在土壤中镍生态阈值建立中的应用研究. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(1): 92-98.

Wang X Q, Wei D P, Huang Z B, Ma Y B. Application of species sensitivity distribution in deriving of ecological thresholds for nickel in soils. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(1): 92-98. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHOU Liang,XIAO Feng,XIAO Huan,ZHANG YuSheng,AO HeJun. Effects of Lime on Cadmium Accumulation of Double-Season Rice in Paddy Fields with Different Cadmium Pollution Degrees [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 780-791.
[2] PENG Ou,LIU YuLing,TIE BaiQing,YE ChangCheng,ZHANG Miao,LI YuanXingLu,ZHOU JunChi,XU Meng,ZHANG Yan,LONG Yong. Effects of Conditioning Agents and Agronomic Measures on Cadmium Uptake by Rice in Polluted Rice Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(3): 574-584.
[3] ZHU YaJing, ZHOU YaLi, LIU SuShuang, WEI JiaPing, LIU XiaoLin, SHEN YingZi, ZHAO HaiHong, MA Hao. GmHMADP Involved in Seed Vigor Formation of Soybean Under High Temperature and Humidity Stress and its Study Responsive to Copper and Cadmium Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(14): 2642-2654.
[4] Hua YU, YuXian SHANGGUAN, ShiHua TU, YuSheng QIN, Kun CHEN, DaoQuan CHEN, QianCong LIU. Sources of Cadmium Accumulated in Rice Grain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10): 1940-1947.
[5] WANG Ting, ZHOU Cui, GU YanWen, MA WenChao, LIU Yuan, WEI Hong. Hyperspectral Estimation of Cadmium Content in Tumorous Stem Mustard Based on the Wavelet-Fractal Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(1): 71-81.
[6] CHEN JiangMin, YANG YongJie, HUANG QiNa, HU PeiSong, TANG ShaoQing, WU LiQun, WANG JianLong, SHAO GuoSheng. Effects of Continuous Flooding on Cadmium Absorption and Its Regulation Mechanisms in Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(17): 3300-3310.
[7] WANG Xue-hua, DAI Li. Immobilization Effect and Its Physiology and Biochemical Mechanism of the Cadmium in Crop Roots [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(22): 4323-4341.
[8] LU Mei-bin, CHEN Zhi-jun, LI Wei-xi, HU Xue-xu, LI Jing-mei, WANG Bu-jun. Survey and Dietary Exposure Assessment of Cadmium in Wheat from Two Main Wheat-Producing Regions in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(19): 3866-3876.
[9] ZHU Zhi-wei, CHEN Ming-xue, MOU Ren-xiang, CAO Zhao-yun, ZHANG Wei-xing, LIN Xiao-yan. Advances in Research of Cadmium Metabolism and Control in Rice Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(18): 3633-3640.
[10] SONG Wen-en, CHEN Shi-bao. The Toxicity Thresholds (ECx) of Cadmium (Cd) to Rice Cultivars as Determined by Root-Elongation Tests in Soils and Its Predicted Models [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(17): 3434-3443.
[11] KONG Long-1, 2 , TAN Xiang-Ping-1, HE Wen-Xiang-1, 3 , WEI Ge-Hong-2. Response of Soil Enzyme Activity in Different Type of Soils to Cadmium Exposure in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(24): 5150-5162.
[12] WU Xiao-Sheng, WEI Shuai, WEI Yi-Min, GUO Bo-Li, YANG Ming-Qi, LIU Xiao-Ling. Effect of Sub-chronic Cadmium Exposure on Liver Biochemical Index in Wuzhishan Pig [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(3): 562-568.
[13] WANG Ji-Cang, LIU Xue-Zhong, YUAN Yan, YI Chuan-Hui, BIAN Jian-Chun, LIU Zong-Ping. The Role of Oxidative Stress on the Apoptosis of Rat Hepatocytes Induced by Cadmium [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(18): 3895-3902.
[14] YU Cai-Lian, LIU Bo, XU Xin. Effect of DA-6 on Enhanced Remediation Efficiency of Solanum nigrum L. in Serious Cadmium Polluted Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(16): 3485-3490.
[15] SHAO Xiao-jie,YANG Hong-qiang,RAN Kun,JIANG Qian-qian,SUN Xiao-li
. Effects of Salicylic Acid on Plasma Membrane ATPase and Free Radical of Grape Root Under Cadmium Stress
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(7): 1441-1447 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!