中国农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (24): 5206-5219.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.24.004

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量、蛋白质含量和土壤硝态氮残留的影响

黄明(),吴金芝(),李友军(),付国占,赵凯男,张振旺,杨中帅,侯园泉   

  1. 河南科技大学农学院,河南洛阳471023
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-03 接受日期:2020-06-03 出版日期:2021-12-16 发布日期:2021-12-28
  • 通讯作者: 吴金芝,李友军
  • 作者简介:黄明,E-mail: huangming_2003@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0300404);河南省特色骨干学科建设——旱地绿色智慧农业学科群(17100001);河南科技大学博士科研启动基金(13480082)

Effects of Tillage Practices and Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates on Grain Yield, Protein Content in Winter Wheat and Soil Nitrate Residue in Dryland

HUANG Ming(),WU JinZhi(),LI YouJun(),FU GuoZhan,ZHAO KaiNan,ZHANG ZhenWang,YANG ZhongShuai,HOU YuanQuan   

  1. College of Agriculture, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, Henan
  • Received:2020-04-03 Accepted:2020-06-03 Online:2021-12-16 Published:2021-12-28
  • Contact: JinZhi WU,YouJun LI

摘要:

【目的】明确旱地小麦增产提质和环境友好协同的耕作与氮肥组合模式。【方法】2016—2017年(欠水年)和2017—2018年(丰水年),在豫西典型旱地小麦种植区设置夏闲季深松(ST,麦收后2周左右并隔年进行)和翻耕(PT,传统的7月底8月初等雨连年进行)2种耕作方式为主处理和小麦播种前施氮0(N0)、120 kg·hm-2(N120)、180 kg·hm-2(N180)和240 kg·hm-2(N240)4个氮肥用量为副处理的二因素裂区田间定位试验,研究其对旱地小麦产量、籽粒蛋白质含量及其产量、植株氮素吸收利用和收获期0—200 cm土层硝态氮残留的影响。【结果】降水年型、耕作方式和氮肥用量及后二者互作对旱地小麦拔节后氮素积累量、籽粒产量、蛋白质产量、氮效率和土壤硝态氮残留量均有显著影响。深松与翻耕相比,显著提高了拔节后植株氮素积累量、花前氮素转运量及N240下的氮收获指数,不同氮肥处理的平均氮肥吸收效率、氮肥农学效率、氮肥利用率和氮肥偏生产力分别显著提高8.6%—15.3%、23.9%—86.5%、8.1%—26.1%和9.1%—20.3%,最终在不降低籽粒蛋白质含量的同时,使产量在欠水年和丰水年分别提高11.9%和12.4%,蛋白质产量提高12.4%和13.5%,收获期0—200 cm土层硝态氮残留量降低11.9%和25.4%。相同耕作方式下,随着氮肥用量的增加,植株氮素积累量、花前氮素转运量、花后氮素对籽粒的贡献率、籽粒蛋白质含量和收获期土壤硝态氮残留量显著增加,花前氮素对籽粒的贡献率、氮素籽粒生产效率、氮肥吸收效率和氮肥偏生产力逐渐降低,氮肥农学效率、氮肥利用率、籽粒产量和蛋白质产量的变化因降水年型和耕作方式而异。从互作效应看,两年中STN240处理的植株氮素积累量最高,其产量和蛋白质产量(除欠水年与ST180处理外)、蛋白质含量(除丰水年与PTN240处理外)均显著高于其他处理,氮肥利用率及其丰水年的氮肥农学效率不低于或显著高于翻耕下的所有施氮处理,收获期的土壤硝态氮残留量较PT240处理降低16.4%。从整体效应看,翻耕配施氮肥180 kg·hm-2可获得最高的籽粒产量以及较优的蛋白质产量、氮肥农学效率和氮肥利用率;深松配施氮肥240 kg·hm-2可通过深松提高氮效率并降低土壤硝态氮残留,通过增加氮肥用量提高蛋白质含量,最终使产量和蛋白质产量较其他处理分别提高2.6%—45.0%和7.3%—81.4%。【结论】深松有利于提高旱地小麦产量、蛋白质产量和氮效率,降低土壤硝态氮残留,但其适宜的氮肥用量高于翻耕。翻耕配施氮肥180 kg·hm-2是兼顾高产高效,深松配施氮肥240 kg·hm-2是兼顾高产优质高效和低硝态氮残留的耕作与氮肥组合。

关键词: 耕作方式, 氮肥用量, 旱地, 小麦, 产量, 蛋白质, 硝态氮残留

Abstract:

【Objective】 The objective of the present study was to clarify the suitable combined pattern of tillage and nitrogen (N) rate for dryland wheat to achieve the target of high-yield, high-quality and environment-friendly production. 【Method】 In the dry year 2016-2017 and wet year 2017-2018, a field experiment was carried out in the typical dryland in the western region of Henan province. In the experiment, the two tillage practices, including subsoiling (ST) and ploughing (PT), were set as main treatment, and the four N fertilizer application rates of 0 (N0), 120 (N120), 180 (N180) and 240 kg·hm-2 (N240), respectively were set as secondary treatment. The subsoiling operation in ST was interval one year and conducted about two weeks after the previous wheat harvest, and the ploughing operation in PT was carried out each year around late July to early August after once heavy precipitation. The grain yield, grain protein content and its yield, and plant N absorption and utilization in wheat were tested, as well as the nitrate residue in the 0-200 cm soil layer in dryland. 【Result】 The plant N accumulation after jointing stage, grain yield, protein yield and N use efficiency in wheat and the nitrate residue in 0-200 cm soil layer at harvest could be significantly regulated by annual precipitation type, tillage practice and N rate, and the interaction of tillage practice and N rate. Compared with PT, ST increased the shoot N accumulation after jointing and the pre-anthesis N translocation under all the four N treatments, and the N harvest index under N240, as well as increasing the N uptake efficiency, N agronomy efficiency, N recovery efficiency and N partial factor productivity by 8.6%-15.3%, 23.9%-86.5%, 8.1%-26.1% and 9.1%-20.3% averaged across different N treatments, respectively. Therefore, compared with PT, the grain yield under ST was significantly increased by 11.9% and 12.4%, respectively, and the grain protein content was kept no significant change, while the average protein yield was increased by 12.4% and 13.5%, but the average nitrate residue was respectively reduced by 11.9% and 25.4% in 0-200 cm soil layer averaged across all the four N treatments in the dry year and the wet year. With the increase of N rate, the shoot N accumulation, pre-anthesis N translocation amount, contribution rate of post-anthesis N accumulation to grain, and grain protein content in wheat and the soil nitrate residue at harvest were significantly increased, and there was a significant decrease on the contribution rate of pre-anthesis N translocation to grain, N grain production efficiency, N uptake efficiency and N partial factor productivity, but the changes in N agronomy efficiency, N recovery efficiency, grain yield and protein yield varied with annual precipitation type and tillage practice. The STN240 had the highest shoot N accumulation in the two years. In addition to no significant difference of grain and protein yield between ST240 and ST180 in the dry year and also of the protein content between ST240 and PT240 in the wet year, the grain yield, protein content and protein yield in ST240 were significantly higher than the other treatments in the two experimental years, the N recovery efficiency of and N agronomy efficiency in the wet year under ST240 were not less than or even significantly higher than that in the N application treatments under PT, and therefore decreased the nitrate residue in 0-200 cm soil at harvest by 16.4% compared with PT240. In general, the N rate at 180 kg·hm-2under PT could reach the highest grain yield and the optimal protein yield, N agronomy efficiency and N recovery efficiency. Compared with other treatments, the N rate at 240 kg·hm-2under ST was the best combination, which could increase the N efficiency and reduce soil nitrate residue via subsoiling during summer fallow period, as well as improving the protein content through the increased N fertilizer rate, and finally increased the grain yield and protein yield by 2.6%-45.0% and 7.3%-81.4%, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Subsoiling tillage could help synchronously to improve the grain yield, protein yield and N efficiency and reduce soil nitrate residue. The suitable N application rate for subsoiling tillage should be higher than that for ploughing tillage. The PTN180 was an optimal combination of tillage practice and N rate for high-yield and high-efficiency, and the STN240 was an optimal model for realizing the collaborative target of high-yield, high-quality, high-efficiency, and low-nitrate residue in dryland wheat production system.

Key words: tillage practice, N fertilizer application rate, dryland, wheat, yield, protein, nitrate residue