中国农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (17): 3726-3736.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.17.014
李小勇1(),顾炽明1,刘康1,廖星1,黄威2,杨志远3,秦璐1()
收稿日期:
2020-09-27
接受日期:
2020-11-11
出版日期:
2021-09-01
发布日期:
2021-09-09
通讯作者:
秦璐
作者简介:
李小勇,E-mail: 基金资助:
LI XiaoYong1(),GU ChiMing1,LIU Kang1,LIAO Xing1,HUANG Wei2,YANG ZhiYuan3,QIN Lu1()
Received:
2020-09-27
Accepted:
2020-11-11
Online:
2021-09-01
Published:
2021-09-09
Contact:
Lu QIN
摘要:
【目的】长江流域多熟制模式下,油菜播种推迟,引起产量低、品质差。为探究施氮量对迟播油菜氮素利用和产量、品质的影响,本研究通过测定不同施氮量下迟播油菜产量构成、农艺性状、养分积累、籽粒品质,以期探明迟播油菜最佳施氮量。【方法】以甘蓝型油菜品种中油杂19为材料,在湖北应城、黄冈进行大田裂区试验,设置2个播期(常规播期S1,10月10日;迟播S2, 11月10日)为主区,4个施氮量(N0:不施氮肥;N1:120 kg·hm-2;N2:240 kg·hm-2;N3:360 kg·hm-2)为副区。【结果】(1)迟播(S2)显著降低油菜籽粒产量,增加氮肥施用量,不同播期油菜单株角果数、每角果粒数及千粒重均有显著上升趋势,与N0相比,在N1、N2和N3处理下,籽粒产量在常规播期下两地平均增加31.9%、68.6%和79.8%,在迟播下两地平均增长36.0%、82.3%和87.3%;(2)播期推迟,油菜根颈粗、株高、分枝起点高度和根系干重均显著下降,地上部干重增加,根冠比下降。增加氮肥施用量,不同播期油菜根颈粗、株高及分枝起点高度增加,地上及根系干重均上升,但根冠比呈现下降趋势;此外,与N0相比,在N1、N2和N3下,倒伏角度在正常播期下两地平均增加162.7%、254.7%和374.7%,在迟播下两地平均增长105.5%、208.7%和303.1%,即增施氮肥加重了倒伏的发生;(3)推迟播期,油菜根系氮含量和氮积累量均下降;籽粒氮含量上升而氮积累量下降、含油率下降;茎秆、角果壳氮含量变化不显著,但氮积累量显著上升。增加氮肥施用量,各部位氮含量和氮积累量增加,含油率下降,但产油量呈上升趋势,在240 kg·hm-2施氮量水平时,产油量在两个播期下均达最大,应城分别为1 830.5和1 534.5 kg·hm-2,黄冈分别为1 535.1和1 220.0 kg·hm-2。籽粒氮素利用率也达最高,应城分别为34.88%和31.14%,黄冈分别为27.95%和25.48%。籽粒氮素利用率与籽粒产量和产油量呈极显著正相关,与倒伏角度不相关,因此可以通过提高籽粒氮素利用率提高籽粒产量和产油量,同时不加重倒伏发生。【结论】增加氮肥施用可提高迟播油菜产量,但氮肥施用应控制在240 kg·hm-2左右,以控制倒伏进一步加剧,并获得最大产油量。
李小勇,顾炽明,刘康,廖星,黄威,杨志远,秦璐. 施氮量对迟播油菜氮素利用和产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(17): 3726-3736.
LI XiaoYong,GU ChiMing,LIU Kang,LIAO Xing,HUANG Wei,YANG ZhiYuan,QIN Lu. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Nitrogen Use Efficiency, Yield and Quality of Late Sowing Rapeseed[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(17): 3726-3736.
表1
播期和施氮量对油菜产量及产量构成的影响"
播期 Sowing date | 施氮量 Nitrogen rate | 应城 Yingcheng | 黄冈 Huanggang | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单株角果数 Effective pods per plant | 每角果粒数 Seeds per pod | 千粒重1000-seed weight (g) | 单株产量 Yield per plant (g) | 实际产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 单株角果数 Effective pods per plant | 每角果粒数 Seeds per pod | 千粒重1000-seed weight (g) | 单株产量 Yield per plant (g) | 实际产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | |||||
S1 | N0 | 60.7c | 17.6c | 4.29c | 4.57e | 2058.6e | 67.3b | 17.2c | 3.91d | 4.53e | 2039.4e | |||
N1 | 72.7b | 20.4b | 4.45c | 6.59c | 2964.2c | 69.5b | 19.1b | 4.09c | 5.42d | 2438.1d | ||||
N2 | 78.4a | 21.2b | 4.92ab | 8.17a | 3674.3a | 82.8a | 19.5ab | 4.45b | 7.16b | 3223.1b | ||||
N3 | 78.9a | 21.2b | 5.07a | 8.48a | 3818.7a | 85.0a | 19.0b | 4.87a | 7.88a | 3546.2a | ||||
S2 | N0 | 39.8e | 21.7b | 4.43c | 3.82f | 1719.6f | 43.5e | 18.9b | 4.13c | 3.39f | 1526.1f | |||
N1 | 48.8d | 23.8a | 4.72b | 5.48d | 2465.8d | 49.7d | 20.2ab | 4.31b | 4.33e | 1947.0e | ||||
N2 | 59.2c | 24.2a | 4.98a | 7.14bc | 3215.0b | 61.7c | 20.4ab | 4.78a | 6.00c | 2699.2c | ||||
N3 | 63.0c | 23.0a | 5.00a | 7.26b | 3265.9b | 62.8c | 21.0a | 4.75a | 6.26c | 2815.9c | ||||
方差分析Variance analysis | ||||||||||||||
S | ** | ** | NS | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
S×N | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ** | NS | NS |
表2
播期和施氮量对油菜成熟期农艺性状的影响"
播期 Sowing date | 施氮量 Nitrogen rate | 应城 Yingcheng | 黄冈 Huanggang | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根颈粗 Root crown diameter (mm) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 分枝起点高度 Branch height (cm) | 根颈粗 Root crown diameter (mm) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 分枝起点高度 Branch height (cm) | ||
S1 | N0 | 9.41d | 153.40bc | 102.50c | 8.03f | 142.77de | 96.11c |
N1 | 11.95b | 179.00a | 119.46b | 11.52c | 165.73ab | 111.43b | |
N2 | 12.09b | 180.85a | 121.29b | 12.33b | 176.80a | 118.44a | |
N3 | 13.10a | 183.00a | 125.45a | 13.24a | 178.25a | 120.47a | |
S2 | N0 | 5.68f | 144.50c | 83.93f | 6.53g | 136.20e | 75.25f |
N1 | 8.50e | 154.00bc | 87.53f | 9.51e | 149.00cde | 81.50e | |
N2 | 9.45d | 156.67bc | 92.86e | 10.17d | 154.62bcd | 87.37d | |
N3 | 11.47c | 160.90b | 97.33d | 11.21c | 159.35bc | 92.35c | |
方差分析Variance analysis | |||||||
S | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
S×N | ** | NS | ** | * | NS | ** |
表3
播期和施氮量对油菜各器官氮含量和氮积累量的影响"
试验点 Trial site | 播期 Sowing date | 施氮量 Nitrogen rate | 根 Root | 茎 Stem | 角果壳 Pod shell | 籽粒 Grain | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮含量 N content (%) | 氮积累量 N uptake(kg·hm-2) | 氮含量 N content (%) | 氮积累量 N uptake(kg·hm-2) | 氮含量 N content (%) | 氮积累量 N uptake(kg·hm-2) | 氮含量 N content (%) | 氮积累量 N uptake(kg·hm-2) | |||
应城 Yingcheng | S1 | N0 | 0.60cd | 3.63cd | 0.39d | 4.28g | 0.59c | 7.47f | 3.21c | 65.96e |
N1 | 0.65bcd | 4.25c | 0.58cd | 26.30e | 0.65bc | 15.65de | 3.45c | 102.27d | ||
N2 | 0.82bc | 6.76b | 0.77bc | 40.15d | 0.75bc | 21.21c | 4.07b | 149.67bc | ||
N3 | 1.37a | 11.46a | 1.19a | 66.16b | 1.21a | 34.52b | 4.61a | 176.18a | ||
S2 | N0 | 0.50d | 2.83d | 0.47cd | 10.93f | 0.52c | 11.22ef | 3.36c | 57.80e | |
N1 | 0.59cd | 3.50cd | 0.60cd | 35.43d | 0.66bc | 16.84cd | 3.58c | 88.23d | ||
N2 | 0.66bcd | 4.24c | 0.94ab | 57.73c | 0.84b | 31.78b | 4.12b | 132.55c | ||
N3 | 0.84b | 6.55b | 1.22a | 85.92a | 1.18a | 47.00a | 4.94a | 161.35ab | ||
黄冈 Huanggang | S1 | N0 | 0.67de | 3.73de | 0.52d | 8.91g | 0.73c | 7.79f | 3.31e | 67.48ef |
N1 | 0.87c | 6.27c | 0.74c | 30.81e | 0.94b | 23.94d | 3.62d | 88.22d | ||
N2 | 1.10b | 9.47b | 1.06b | 53.83c | 1.00b | 27.94d | 4.17c | 134.56b | ||
N3 | 1.51a | 13.45a | 1.23a | 71.04b | 1.44a | 46.02b | 4.72b | 167.26a | ||
S2 | N0 | 0.57e | 2.93e | 0.58d | 16.04f | 0.79c | 14.94e | 3.46de | 52.87f | |
N1 | 0.74d | 4.78d | 0.76c | 36.53d | 0.96b | 26.16d | 3.68d | 71.68de | ||
N2 | 1.05b | 8.36b | 1.07b | 68.87b | 1.01b | 33.63c | 4.22c | 114.06c | ||
N3 | 1.08b | 9.09b | 1.27a | 92.54a | 1.46a | 57.07a | 5.04a | 142.00b | ||
方差分析 Variance analysis | ||||||||||
S | ** | ** | NS | ** | NS | ** | ** | ** | ||
N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
S×N | ** | ** | NS | ** | NS | ** | NS | NS |
表4
器官氮累积量与籽粒产量品质相关性分析"
实际产量 Yield | 含油率 Oil content | 产油量 Oil yield | 倒伏角度 Lodging angle | |
---|---|---|---|---|
根氮积累量 Root nitrogen uptake | 0.731** | -0.717** | 0.568* | 0.586* |
茎氮积累量 Stem nitrogen uptake | 0.688** | -0.932** | 0.461 | 0.974** |
角果壳氮积累量 Pod shell nitrogen uptake | 0.587* | -0.961** | 0.330 | 0.941** |
籽粒氮积累量 Seed nitrogen uptake | 0.956** | -0.702** | 0.832** | 0.785** |
籽粒氮利用率 Seed nitrogen use efficiency | 0.860** | 0.123 | 0.887** | 0.168 |
氮生理效率 Nitrogen physiological efficiency | -0.543* | 0.923** | -0.312 | -0.932** |
[1] | FAO. Statistical Databases, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. 2020. http://www.fao.org. |
[2] | 胡敏, 鲁剑巍, 王振, 游秋香. 晚播油菜绿肥适宜播种量研究. 作物杂志, 2016(6): 120-123. |
HU M, LU J W, WANG Z, YOU Q X. Study on the appropriate seeding rate of late sowing oilseed rape as green manure. Crops, 2016(6): 120-123.(in Chinese) | |
[3] | DOMINIC J S, CHRISTOPH K, GERASSIMOS P, ROLAND G. Do cover crop sowing date and fertilization affect field weed suppression? Plant, Soil and Environment, 2017, 63(2): 45-51. |
[4] |
LI X Y, ZUO Q S, CHANG H B, BAI G P, KUAI J, ZHOU G S. Higher density planting benefits mechanical harvesting of rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Field Crops Research, 2018, 218: 97-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.013 |
[5] |
SCOTT R K, OGUNREMI E A, IVINS J D, MENDHAM N J. The effect of sowing date and season on growth and yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1973, 81(2): 277-285.
doi: 10.1017/S0021859600058937 |
[6] | 李俊, 官春云, 袁金展, 马霓, 谭太龙, 任莉, 方小平, 李光明, 张春雷. 播期对不同熟性油菜品种生物学特性及产量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35: 291-295. |
LI J, GUAN C Y, YUAN J Z, MA N, TAN T L, REN L, FANG X P, LI G M, ZHANG C L. Effects of sowing date on biological characteristics and yield of rapeseed with different ripeness. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2013, 35: 291-295.(in Chinese) | |
[7] | 肖庆生, 夏志涛, 周灿金, 邹崇顺, 张学昆, 廖星. 氮磷钾肥对迟直播油菜产量和品质的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(2): 263-269. |
XIAO Q S, XIA Z T, ZHOU C J, ZOU C S, ZHANG X K, LIAO X. Effects of N, P, K fertilization on yield and quality of delayed direct-seeding rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2010, 32(2): 263-269.(in Chinese) | |
[8] |
DINGKUHN M, DE DATTA S K, PAMPLONA R, JAVELLANA C, SCHNIER H F. Effect of late-season N fertilization on photosynthesis and yield of transplanted and direct-seeded tropical flooded rice. II. A canopy stratification study. Field Crops Research, 1992, 28(3): 235-249.
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(92)90043-9 |
[9] |
OZER H. Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy, 2003, 19(3): 453-463.
doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00136-3 |
[10] | 刘涛, 鲁剑巍, 任涛, 汪威, 王振, 王少华. 适宜氮水平下冬油菜苗期不同叶位叶片光合氮分配特征. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(18): 3532-3541. |
LIU T, LU J W, REN T, WANG W, WANG Z, WANG S H. Characteristics of photosynthetic nitrogen allocation in leaves of different positions in winter oilseed rape at seedling stage under suitable nitrogen level. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(18): 3532-3541.(in Chinese) | |
[11] | CHENG B, CHAO Y, MA N, ZHANG C L, LI G M. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on the growth and N uptake of late-sowing winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) full-text in English. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2012, 13(6): 1282-1286. |
[12] |
蒯婕, 左青松, 陈爱武, 程雨贵, 梅少华, 吴江生, 周广生. 不同栽培模式对油菜产量和倒伏相关性状的影响. 作物学报, 2017, 43(6): 875-884.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00875 |
KUAI J, ZUO Q S, CHEN A W, CHENG Y G, MEI S H, WU J S, ZHOU G S. Effects of different cultivation modes on canola yield and lodging related indices. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(6): 875-884. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00875 |
|
[13] | 李银水, 余常兵, 廖星, 胡小加, 谢立华, 张树杰, 车志, 廖祥生. 施肥对油菜菌核病发生的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35(3): 290-294. |
LI Y S, YU C B, LIAO X, HU X J, XIE L H, ZHANG S J, CHE Z, LIAO X S. Influence analysis of application of NPK fertilizer on epidemics of rapeseed Sclerotinia stem rot. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2013, 35(3): 290-294.(in Chinese) | |
[14] |
KUAI J, SUN Y Y, ZHOU M, ZHANG P P, ZUO Q S, WU J S, ZHOU G S. The effect of nitrogen application and planting density on the radiation use efficiency and the stem lignin metabolism in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Research, 2016, 199: 89-98.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.09.025 |
[15] | 宋海星, 彭建伟, 刘强, 荣湘民, 谢桂先, 张振华, 官春云, 李合松, 陈社员. 不同氮素生理效率油菜生育后期氮素再分配特性研究. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(6): 1858-1864. |
SONG H X, PENG J W, LIU Q, RONG X M, XIE G X, ZHANG Z H, GUAN C Y, LI H S, CHEN S Y. Nitrogen redistribution characteristics of oilseed rape varieties with different nitrogen physiological efficiency during later growing period. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(6): 1858-1864.(in Chinese) | |
[16] |
BALALIĆ I, ZORIĆ M, BRANKOVIĆ G, TERZIĆ S, CRNOBARAC J. Interpretation of hybrid × sowing date interaction for oil content and oil yield in sunflower. Field Crops Research, 2012, 137: 70-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.08.005 |
[17] | 张学昆, 张春雷, 廖星, 王汉中. 2008年长江流域油菜低温冻害调查分析. 中国油料作物学报, 2008, 30(1): 122-126. |
ZHANG X K, ZHANG C L, LIAO X, WANG H Z. Investigation on 2008'low temperature and freeze injure on winter rape along Yangtze River. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2008, 30(1): 122-126.(in Chinese) | |
[18] | 蒯婕, 王积军, 左青松, 陈红琳, 高建芹, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 长江流域直播油菜密植效应及其机理研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(24): 4625-4632. |
KUAI J, WANG J J, ZUO Q S, CHEN H L, GAO J Q, WANG B, ZHOU G S, FU T D. Effects and mechanism of higher plant density on directly-sown rapeseed in the Yangtze River basin of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(24): 4625-4632.(in Chinese) | |
[19] |
ASARE E, SCARISBRICK D H. Rate of nitrogen and sulphur fertilizers on yield, yield components and seed quality of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Research, 1995, 44(1): 41-46.
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00051-7 |
[20] |
LI X H, LI Q B, YANG T W, NIE Z N, CHEN G X, HU L Y. Responses of plant development, biomass and seed production of direct sown oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to nitrogen application at different stages in Yangtze River Basin. Field Crops Research, 2016, 194: 12-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.024 |
[21] |
KUAI J, SUN Y Y, GUO C, ZHAO L, ZUO Q S, WU J S, ZHOU G S. Root-applied silicon in the early bud stage increases the rapeseed yield and optimizes the mechanical harvesting characteristics. Field Crops Research, 2017, 200: 88-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.10.007 |
[22] | 杨泽鹏, 陈红琳, 郭娟, 王昌桃, 刘定辉. 播期对川中丘陵区油菜倒伏性状的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(2): 150-155. |
YANG Z P, CHEN H L, GUO J, WANG C T, LIU D H. Effects of sowing date on lodging traits of rape in the hilly central Sichuan basin, China. Crops, 2019(2): 150-155.(in Chinese) | |
[23] |
BARRACLOUGH P B, LEIGH R A. The growth and activity of winter wheat roots in the field: The effect of sowing date and soil type on root growth of high-yielding crops. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1984, 103(1): 59-74.
doi: 10.1017/S002185960004332X |
[24] |
左青松, 蒯婕, 杨士芬, 曹石, 杨阳, 吴莲蓉, 孙盈盈, 周广生, 吴江生. 不同氮肥和密度对直播油菜冠层结构及群体特征的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41(5): 758-765.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00758 |
ZUO Q S, KUAI J, YANG S F, CAO S, YANG Y, WU L R, SUN Y Y, ZHOU G S, WU J S. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and planting density on canopy structure and population characteristic of rapeseed with direct seeding treatment. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(5): 758-765.(in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00758 |
|
[25] |
VOISIN A S, SALON C, MUNIER-JOLAIN N G, NEY B. Effect of mineral nitrogen on nitrogen nutrition and biomass partitioning between the shoot and roots of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant and Soil, 2002, 242(2): 251-262.
doi: 10.1023/A:1016214223900 |
[26] |
KENDALL S L, HOLMES H, WHITE C, CLARKE S M, BERRY P M. Quantifying lodging-induced yield losses in oilseed rape. Field Crops Research, 2017, 211: 106-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.013 |
[27] | 涂玉琴, 戴兴临. 花期低温阴雨对甘蓝型油菜产量和种子含油量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2011, 33(5): 470-475. |
TU Y Q, DAI X L. Effects of continuous low temperature overcast and rainy weather on yield and oil content of Brassica napus during flowering stage. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2011, 33(5): 470-475.(in Chinese) | |
[28] | 姜海杨, 孙万仓, 曾秀存, 方彦, 陈姣荣, 史鹏辉, 赵彩霞, 何丽. 播期对北方白菜型冬油菜生长发育及产量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34(6): 620-626. |
JIANG H Y, SUN W C, ZENG X C, FANG Y, CHEN J R, SHI P H, ZHAO C X, HE L. Effect of sowing date on Brassica rapa growth and yield in Northern China. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2012, 34(6): 620-626.(in Chinese) | |
[29] |
IBRAHIM A F, ABUSTEIT E O, EL-METWALLY E M A. Response of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) growth, yield, oil content and its fatty acids to nitrogen rates and application times. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1989, 162(2): 107-112.
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1989.tb00695.x |
[30] |
ZHANG S J, LIAO X, ZHANG C L, XU H J. Influences of plant density on the seed yield and oil content of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 2012, 40: 27-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.02.016 |
[31] | 赵佩欧, 郑可助, 王春猜. 迟播对机收油菜浙油18生育期和产量的影响. 浙江农业科学, 2011, 52(2): 333-334. |
ZHAO P O, ZHENG K Z, WANG C C. Effect of delayed sowing on growth stage and yield characteristics of machine-harvest rapeseed variety Zheyou No.18. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 52(2): 333-334.(in Chinese) | |
[32] |
KHAN A, NAJEEB U, WANG L S, TAN D K Y, YANG G Z, MUNSIF F, ALI S, HAFEEZ A. Planting density and sowing date strongly influence growth and lint yield of cotton crops. Field Crops Research, 2017, 209: 129-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.04.019 |
[33] |
CALISKAN S, CALISKAN M E, ARSLAN M, ARIOGLU H. Effects of sowing date and growth duration on growth and yield of groundnut in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. Field Crops Research, 2008, 105(1/2): 131-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.08.007 |
[34] |
BRENNAN R F, MASON M G, WALTON G H. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the concentrations of oil and protein in canola (Brassica napus)seed. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2000, 23(3): 339-348.
doi: 10.1080/01904160009382020 |
[35] |
GUENDEL A, ROLLETSCHEK H, WAGNER S, MUSZYNSKA A, BORISJUK L. Micro imaging displays the sucrose landscape within and along its allocation pathways. Plant Physiology, 2018, 178(4): 1448-1460.
doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00947 |
[1] | 张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263. |
[2] | 严艳鸽, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素对冬小麦产量和肥料氮去向的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 287-299. |
[3] | 徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313. |
[4] | 王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16. |
[5] | 赵政鑫,王晓云,田雅洁,王锐,彭青,蔡焕杰. 未来气候条件下秸秆还田和氮肥种类对夏玉米产量及土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 104-117. |
[6] | 胡盛,李阳阳,唐章林,李加纳,曲存民,刘列钊. 干旱胁迫下甘蓝型油菜籽粒含油量和蛋白质含量变化的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 17-30. |
[7] | 张玮,严玲玲,傅志强,徐莹,郭慧娟,周梦瑶,龙攀. 播期对湖南省双季稻产量和光热资源利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 31-45. |
[8] | 熊伟仡,徐开未,刘明鹏,肖华,裴丽珍,彭丹丹,陈远学. 不同氮用量对四川春玉米光合特性、氮利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748. |
[9] | 李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762. |
[10] | 王浩琳,马悦,李永华,李超,赵明琴,苑爱静,邱炜红,何刚,石美,王朝辉. 基于小麦产量与籽粒锰含量的磷肥优化管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810. |
[11] | 桂润飞,王在满,潘圣刚,张明华,唐湘如,莫钊文. 香稻分蘖期减氮侧深施液体肥对产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545. |
[12] | 廖萍,孟轶,翁文安,黄山,曾勇军,张洪程. 杂交稻对产量和氮素利用率影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556. |
[13] | 李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616. |
[14] | 秦羽青,程宏波,柴雨葳,马建涛,李瑞,李亚伟,常磊,柴守玺. 中国北方地区小麦覆盖栽培增产效应的荟萃(Meta)分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109. |
[15] | 谭先明,张佳伟,王仲林,谌俊旭,杨峰,杨文钰. 基于PLS的不同水氮条件下带状套作玉米产量预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138. |
|