基于水稻根伸长的不同土壤中镉（Cd）毒性阈值（ECx）及预测模型

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.17.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】虽然土壤中镉（Cd）污染对水稻的生态风险受关注已久，然而大量研究集中在基于稻米中Cd限量标准的健康风险研究，而针对土壤中Cd污染的生态风险阈值研究较少。研究通过ISO11269-1根伸长毒性测试方法，测定不同性质土壤中Cd对水稻的毒性阈值（ECx，x=10，50）及其预测模型，以期为基于生态毒理效应的中国土壤Cd污染基准值的修订提供参考。【方法】采用中国8种不同性质农田土壤和3种不同Cd敏感性差异的水稻品种（T优167，T167；陆两优28，L28；湘早45，X45）为试材，每种土壤添加7个Cd浓度，通过ISO11269-1根伸长测试方法，测量水稻根的相对伸长量，并结合Log-Logistic分布函数模型测定不同土壤中水稻Cd毒性的剂量-效应关系、毒性阈值（ECx, x=10, 50）及其预测模型。【结果】随着土壤Cd浓度的增加，不同土壤中水稻的相对根长（%）逐渐减小，基于根伸长的Cd对水稻毒性的10%抑制浓度的毒性阈值（EC10）和半抑制浓度（EC50）值在不同土壤和不同Cd敏感性水稻品种间有较大差异。总体而言，在3种不同Cd敏感性（T167＞L28＞X45）水稻品种中，同一土壤中Cd的水稻毒性ECx（x=10，50）随着水稻对Cd胁迫的敏感性增强而降低；就单一品种水稻而言，不同土壤的Cd水稻毒性阈值ECx间有显著差异。其中，以Cd敏感性水稻品种T167测试的不同土壤EC10变化为1.40—5.25 mg•kg-1，最大相差275.0%，EC50变化为17.83—46.93 mg•kg-1，最大相差163.2%；以Cd非敏感性水稻品种X45测试的不同土壤EC10变化为1.72—8.22 mg•kg-1，最大相差377.9%，EC50变化为26.96—68.16 mg•kg-1，最大相差152.8%。通过水稻Cd毒性阈值ECx与土壤性质间的多元回归分析表明，土壤pH、有机碳（OC）、阳离子交换量（CEC）与水稻Cd毒性阈值间呈正相关关系，基于土壤主要性质的水稻Cd毒性预测模型表明，EC50实测值均在预测值2倍误差（±S.D）范围内。【结论】基于ISO11269-1根伸长毒性测试结果表明，不同土壤中Cd的水稻毒性阈值间有显著差异，土壤pH、OC及CEC与水稻Cd的毒性阈值间呈显著正相关关系（P＜0.05），基于上述土壤性质的预测模型可以很好预测不同土壤中Cd对水稻的毒性；不同Cd敏感性品种对测定土壤中水稻Cd毒性阈值有明显差异，因此，在制订土壤中Cd的生态基准时应充分考虑不同物种的敏感性差异特征。

关键词: 水稻 , 镉 , 毒性阈值 , 预测模型

Abstract: 【Objective】Although the attention has been paid for decades to the ecological risk of Cd to rice in soils, most studies focused on its healthy risk in terms of the food standard instead of its ecological risk and toxicity thresholds in soils. The toxicity thresholds (ECx, x=10, 50) and its predicted models of Cd to rice cultivars in various soils in China were determined using ISO 11269-1 root-elongation endpoints with the aim of providing fundamental data for the revision of soil environmental quality standards of Cd in soils of China.【Method】Eight different soils with various properties and three rice cultivars were selected in this study, the dose-response curves and the toxicity thresholds were investigated using Log-Logistic distribution models based on the ISO 11269-1 root-elongation test in soils, the predicted models for Cd toxicity was also developed in this study. 【Result】The results indicated that the relative root elongation (%) decreased with the Cd concentrations increment in soils. The 10% (EC10) and the half inhibiting concentration (EC50) of Cd to rice cultivars varied significantly among the tested soils and the rice species. In general, the toxicity thresholds (ECx, x=10, 50) of Cd to rice species decreased with it’s sensitiveness to Cd stress in soils, i.e. the ECx followed the order of T167＞L28＞X45. The significant differences of the toxicity thresholds (ECx, x=10, 50) of Cd to rice species were also observed in this study as determined with single rice species, e.g. in terms of the Cd-stress-sensitive cultivar of T167, the 10% inhibiting concentration (EC10) of Cd to root-elongation varied form 1.40-5.25 mg•kg-1 with the maximum variety of 275.0%, the half inhibiting concentration (EC50) varied form 17.83-46.93 mg•kg-1 with the maximum variety of 163.2%, respectively. However, for the Cd-stress-tolerance cultivar of X45, the 10% inhibiting concentration (EC10) of Cd to root-elongation varied form 1.72-8.22 mg•kg-1 with the maximum variety of 377.9%, the EC50 varied form 26.96-68.16 mg•kg-1 with the maximum variety of 152.8%, respectively. The multiple regression analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation (P＜0.05) between soil pH, organic carbon (OC), cation exchange capacity (CEC) and the toxicity thresholds (ECx, x=10, 50) of Cd to rice cultivars in soils. A predicted model was developed and validated for the toxicity thresholds (ECx, x=10, 50) of Cd to rice with the measured ECx fell within the range of predicted values±2 standard deviations. 【Conclusion】 Significant difference of the toxicity thresholds (ECx, x=10, 50) of Cd to rice cultivars was observed in soils as determined by root-elongation test, and a significant positive correlation (P＜0.05) was also observed between soil pH, OC, CEC and the toxicity thresholds. The ECx of Cd toxicity were affected by the variance of the tested rice cultivars in soils, the ecological toxicity of Cd to different test endpoints should be considered for the future revision of the soil environmental quality standards of Cd in soils of China.

Key words: rice , cadmium , toxicity threshold , predicted model

宋文恩，陈世宝. 基于水稻根伸长的不同土壤中镉（Cd）毒性阈值（ECx）及预测模型[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(17): 3434-3443.

SONG Wen-en, CHEN Shi-bao. The Toxicity Thresholds (ECx) of Cadmium (Cd) to Rice Cultivars as Determined by Root-Elongation Tests in Soils and Its Predicted Models[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(17): 3434-3443.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.17.011

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2014/V47/I17/3434

参考文献

[1]骆永明. 污染土壤修复技术研究现状与趋势. 化学进展, 2009, 21(2/3): 558-565.
Luo Y M. Current research and development in soil remediation technologies. Progress in Chemistry, 2009, 21(2/3): 558-565. (in Chinese)
[2]Wang M, Chen A, Wong M, Qiu R, Cheng H, Ye Z. Cadmium accumulation in and tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties with different rates of radial oxygen loss. Environmental Pollution, 2011, 159(6): 1730-1736.
[3]Yu H, Wang J, Fang W, Yuan J, Yang Z. Cadmium accumulation in different rice cultivars and screening for pollution-safe cultivars of rice. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 370(2): 302-309.
[4]Yang Q, Lan C, Wang H, Zhuang P, Shu W. Cadmium in soi-rice system and health risk associated with the use of untreated mining wastewater for irrigation in Lechang, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 84(1): 147-152.
[5]Yoshihara T, Goto F, Shoji K, Kohno Y. Cross relationships of Cu, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cd accumulations in common japonica and indica rice cultivars in Japan. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2010, 68(2): 180-187.
[6]US EPA. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. Washington DC: US EPA, 1998.
[7]European Commission. Technical guidance document on risk assessment in support of commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances, and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. European Commission, 2003.
[8]雷炳莉, 黄圣彪, 王子健. 生态风险评价理论和方法. 化学进展, 2009, 21(2/3): 350-358.
Lei B L, Huang S B, Wang Z J. Theories and methods of ecological risk assessment. Progress in Chemistry, 2009, 21(2/3): 350-358. (in Chinese)
[9]黄圣彪, 王子健, 乔敏. 区域环境风险评价及其关键科学问题. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(5): 705-713.
Huang S B, Wang Z J, Qiao M. Ecological risk assessment (ERA) at the regional scale. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(5): 705-713. (in Chinese)
[10]赵勇, 李红娟, 魏婷婷, 孙志强. 土壤、蔬菜的铅污染相关性分析及土壤铅污染闽限值研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(4): 843-847.
Zhao Y, Li H J, Wei T T, Sun Z Q. Relationship between soil Pb pollution and Pb contents in vegetables and pollution threshold of soil Pb. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(4): 843-847. (in Chinese)
[11]王小庆, 李波, 韦东普, 马义兵, 黄占斌. 土壤中铜和镍的植物毒性预测模型的种间外推验证. 生态毒理学报, 2013, 8(1): 77-84.
Wang X Q, Li B, Wei D P, Ma Y B, Huang Z B. Cross-species extrapolation of phytotoxicity prediction models for nickel and copper added to soil. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2013, 8(1): 77-84. (in Chinese)
[12]陈世宝, 林蕾, 魏威, 刘继芳, 马义兵. 基于不同测试终点的土壤锌毒性阈值及预测模型. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(5): 922-930.
Chen S B, Lin L, Wei W, Liu J F, Ma Y B. Comparative study of Zn-toxicity thresholds in 16 Chinese soils as determined by different bioassay endpoints and its predicted models. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(5): 922-930. (in Chinese)
[13]孙聪, 陈世宝, 马义兵, 刘继芳. 基于物种敏感性分布 (Burr-Ⅲ) 模型预测 Cd 对水稻毒害的生态风险阈值HC5. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(12): 2316-2322.
Sun C, Chen S B, Ma Y B, Liu J F. Ecological hazard concentration (HC5) of Cadmium (Cd) to rice cultivars under hydroponic culture as determined with species sensitivity distribution model (Burr-Ⅲ). Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2013, 32(12): 2316-2322. (in Chinese)
[14]Römkens P, Brus D, Guo H, Chu C, Chiang C, Koopmans G. Impact of model uncertainty on soil quality standards for cadmium in rice paddy fields. Science of the Total Environment, 2011, 409(17): 3098-3105.
[15]Liu D, Zhang C, Chen X, Yang Y, Wang S, Li Y, Hu H, Ge Y, Cheng W. Effects of pH, Fe, and Cd on the uptake of Fe2+ and Cd2+ by rice. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(12): 8947-8954.
[16]周启星, 王毅. 我国农业土壤质量基准建立的方法体系研究. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2012, 20: 38-44.
Zhou Q X, Wang Y. Methodological systems of building agricultural soil quality criteria in China. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2012, 20: 38-44. (in Chinese)
[17]Ye X, Ma Y, Sun B. Influence of soil type and genotype on Cd bioavailability and uptake by rice and implications for food safety. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2012, 24(9): 1647-1654.
[18]Schabenberger O, Tharp B E, Kells J J, Penner D. Statistical tests for hormesis and effective dosages in herbicide dose response. Agronomy Journal, 1999, 91(4): 713-721.
[19]邹晓锦, 仇荣亮, 黄穗虹. 大宝山矿区重金属污染对作物的生态毒性研究. 农业环境科学学报, 2007, 26: 479-483.
Zou X J, Qiu R L, Huang S H. Effect of mining contamination in Dabao mountain on plant ecotoxicity. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2007, 26: 479-483. (in Chinese)
[20]Smolders E, Oorts K, Van Sprang P, Schoeters I, Janssen C R, Mcgrath S P, Mclaughlin M J. Toxicity of trace metals in soil as affected by soil type and aging after contamination: using calibrated bioavailability models to set ecological soil standards. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2009, 28(8): 1633-1642.
[21]Naidu R, Bolan N S, Kookana R S, Tiller K. Ionic-strength and pH effects on the sorption of cadmium and the surface charge of soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 1994, 45(4): 419-429.
[22]宗良纲, 徐晓炎. 土壤中镉的吸附解吸研究进展. 生态环境, 2003, 12(3): 331-335.
Zong L G, Xu X Y. Advance in studies of cadmium sortion and desorption in soils. Ecology and Environment, 2003, 12(3): 331-335. (in Chinese)
[23]Bolan N S, Makino T, Kunhikrishnan A, Kim P J, Ishikawa S, Murakami M, Naidu R, Kirkham M B. Cadmium contamination and its risk management in rice ecosystems. Advances in Agronomy, 2013, 119: 183-273.
[24]Rafiq M T, Aziz R, Yang X, Xiao W, Rafiq M K, Ali B, Li T. Cadmium phytoavailability to rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in representative Chinese soils. A model to improve soil environmental quality guidelines for food safety. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.10.016.
[25]Römkens P, Guo H, Chu C, Liu T, Chiang C, Koopmans G. Prediction of cadmium uptake by brown rice and derivation of soil-plant transfer models to improve soil protection guidelines. Environmental Pollution, 2009, 157(8): 2435-2444.
[26]Liu J, Qian M, Cai G, Yang J, Zhu Q. Uptake and translocation of Cd in different rice cultivars and the relation with Cd accumulation in rice grain. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 143(1): 443-447.
[27]He J, Ren Y, Wang F, Pan X, Zhu C, Jiang D. Characterization of cadmium uptake and translocation in a cadmium-sensitive mutant of rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2009, 57(2): 299-306.
[28]Ding C, Zhang T, Wang X, Zhou F, Yang Y, Huang G. Prediction model for cadmium transfer from soil to carrot (Daucus carota L.) and its application to derive soil thresholds for food safety. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61(43): 10273-10282.
[29]François M, Grant C, Lambert R, Sauvé S. Prediction of cadmium and zinc concentration in wheat grain from soils affected by the application of phosphate fertilizers varying in Cd concentration. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2009, 83(2): 125-133.