水分胁迫下硅对水稻苗期根系生理生化性状的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.12.021

中国农业科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 2510-2519.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.12.021

水分胁迫下硅对水稻苗期根系生理生化性状的影响

明东风, 袁红梅, 王玉海, 宫海军, 周伟军

1.浙江大学农业与生物技术学院，杭州 310058
2.枣庄学院生命科学学院，山东枣庄 277160
3.枣庄学院化学化工与材料科学学院，山东枣庄 277160
4.西北农林科技大学园艺学院，陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2011-02-20 出版日期:2012-06-15 发布日期:2012-03-26
通讯作者: 通信作者周伟军，Tel：0571- 88208496；E-mail：wjzhou@zju.edu.cn；通信作者宫海军，Tel：029- 87082613；E-mail：gongnavy@yahoo.com
作者简介:明东风，E-mail：mingdongfeng@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（30600377，31071698，31170405）、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（QN2011092）、教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”（NCET-11-0441）

Effects of Silicon on the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Roots of Rice Seedlings Under Water Stress

MING Dong-Feng, YUAN Hong-Mei, WANG Yu-Hai, GONG Hai-Jun, ZHOU Wei-Jun

1.浙江大学农业与生物技术学院，杭州 310058
2.枣庄学院生命科学学院，山东枣庄 277160
3.枣庄学院化学化工与材料科学学院，山东枣庄 277160
4.西北农林科技大学园艺学院，陕西杨凌 712100

Received:2011-02-20 Online:2012-06-15 Published:2012-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】分析施硅对水分胁迫下水稻苗期根系生理生化性状的影响，阐明施硅提高根系抗水分胁迫能力的机理。【方法】采用水培试验，以聚乙二醇（PEG-6000）模拟水分胁迫，以秀水11和巴西陆稻两个水稻品种为材料，研究施硅对根系相关生理生化指标的影响。【结果】施硅能够显著提高PEG诱导的水分胁迫下水稻根系的干物重和相对含水量，并抑制根系过度呼吸消耗。在处理第8天时，与单纯PEG处理相比，施硅使水分胁迫下的秀水11和巴西陆稻根系丙二醛（MDA）含量分别下降了23%和21%，相对电渗透率分别减少了39%和38%，增加了根系质膜的稳定性。施硅还抑制了活性氧的产生、增强了根系抗氧化能力，减缓了根系细胞中脱落酸（ABA）的快速降解。【结论】施硅能减轻水分亏缺所引起的水稻根系生理活性快速下降，从而增强苗期水稻根系对水分胁迫的抗性。

关键词: 水稻, 硅, 水分胁迫, 根系

Abstract: 【Objective】 In order to clarify the mechanism of silicon (Si) in enhancing the resistance to water stress, the effects of Si on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of the roots of rice seedlings were investigated under water stress. 【Method】 The effects of exogenous Si on the physiological and biochemical parameters of roots of rice [(Oryza sativa ssp. (keng) Ting cv. Xiushui 11) and Brazilian upland rice (O. sativa cv. IAPAR 9)] were investigated under water stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) in hydroponic conditions. 【Result】 Exogenous Si could restrain excessive respiration, and increase the dry matter weight and relative water content of the PEG-stressed rice roots. On the 8th day after PEG treatment, the malondialdehyde (MDA) content in the roots of both Si-treated rice cultivars was decreased by 23% and 21%, and the relative electrolyte leakage was decreased by 39% and 38%, respectively, as compared to those of PEG treatment only. Consequently, the plasma membrane stability of the stressed roots was enhanced by Si application. In addition, exogenous Si also increased the root antioxidant defense capacity, slowed down the degradation of abscisic acid (ABA) in rice roots under PEG stress. 【Conclusion】 Silicon application could enhance the resistance of rice roots to water deficit stress by preventing the rapid decline of physiological and biochemical activities in roots.

Key words: rice, silicon, water stress, root

明东风, 袁红梅, 王玉海, 宫海军, 周伟军. 水分胁迫下硅对水稻苗期根系生理生化性状的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12): 2510-2519.

MING Dong-Feng, YUAN Hong-Mei, WANG Yu-Hai, GONG Hai-Jun, ZHOU Wei-Jun. Effects of Silicon on the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Roots of Rice Seedlings Under Water Stress[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2510-2519.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.12.021

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2012/V45/I12/2510

参考文献

[1]王宝山. 植物生理学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003: 264-269, 286-288, 298-302.

Wang B S. Plant Physiology. Beijing: Science Press, 2003: 264-269, 286-288, 298-302. (in Chinese)

[2]Bernier J, Atlin G N, Serraj R, Kumar A, Spaner D. Breeding upland rice for drought resistance. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2008, 88: 927-939.

[3]Ma J F. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2004, 50: 11-18.

[4]Liang Y, Sun W, Zhu Y G, Christie P. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of abiotic stresses in higher plants: A review. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 147: 422-428.

[5]Gong H J, Randall D P, Flowers T J. Silicon deposition in the root reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by reducing bypass flow. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2006, 29: 1970-1979.

[6]Farooq M, Wahid A, Lee D J, Ito O, Siddique K H M. Advances in drought resistance of rice. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 2009, 28: 199-217.

[7]Ming D F, Pei Z F, Naeem M S, Gong H J, Zhou W J. Silicon alleviates PEG-induced water-deficit stress in upland rice seedlings by enhancing osmotic adjustment. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2012, 198: 14-26.

[8]Isa M, Bai S, Yokoyama T, Ma J F, Ishibashi Y, Yuasa T, Iwaya-Inoue M. Silicon enhances growth independent of sílica deposition in a low-silica rice mutant, lsi1. Plant and Soil, 2010, 331: 361-375.

[9]Yoshida S, Forno D A, Cock J H, Gomez K. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. 3rd Edition. Manila Philippines: The International Rice Research Institute, 1976: 62-63.

[10]Dai W M, Zhang K Q, Duan B W, Sun C X, Zheng K L, Cai R, Zhuang J Y. Rapid determination of silicon content in rice. Rice Science, 2005, 12: 145-147.

[11]Zabadal T J. A water potential threshold for the increase of abscisic acid in leaves. Plant Physiology, 1974, 53: 125-127.

[12]张志良, 瞿伟菁, 李小方. 植物生理学实验指导. 4版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009: 3, 80, 125, 207, 221-227, 236-244.

Zhang Z L, Qu W J, Li X F. Experimental Guide of Plant Physiology. 4th Edition. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003: 3, 80, 125, 207, 221-227, 236-244. (in Chinese)

[13]Liu D, Pei Z F, Naeem M S, Ming D F, Liu H B, Khan F, Zhou W J. 5-aminolevulinic acid activates antioxidative defence system and seedling growth in Brassica napus L. under water-deficit stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2011, 197: 284-295.

[14]Zhang W F, Zhang F, Raziuddin R, Gong H J, Yang Z M, Lu L, Ye Q F, Zhou W J. Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid on oilseed rape seedling growth under herbicide toxicity stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2008, 27: 159-169.

[15]Zhou W J, Leul M. Uniconazole-induced alleviation of freezing injury in relation to changes in hormonal balance, enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in winter rape. Plant Growth Regulation, 1998, 26: 41-47.

[16]Noodén L D, Guiamet J J, John I. Senescence mechanisms. Physiologia Plantarum, 1997, 101: 746-753.

[17]Dat J, van Denabeele S, Vranová E, van Montagu M, Inzé D, Van Breusegem F. Dual action for the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2000, 57: 779-795.

[18]Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra S M A. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Sustainable Agriculture, 2009, 1: 153-188.

[19]Pei Z F, Ming D F, Liu D, Wan G L, Geng X X, Gong H J, Zhou W J. Silicon improves the tolerance to water-deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2010, 29: 106-115.

[20]Sonobe K, Hattori T, An P, Tsuji W, Eneji A, Kobayashi S, Kawamura Y, Tanaka K, Inanaga S. Effect of silicon application on sorghum root responses to water stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2011, 34: 71-82.

[21]Ahmed M, Fayyaz H, Khurshid Y. Does silicon and irrigation have impact on drought tolerance mechanism of sorghum? Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98: 1808-1812.

[22]马廷臣, 余蓉蓉, 陈荣军, 曾汉来, 张端品. PEG-6000模拟干旱对水稻幼苗期根系的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(6): 1206-1211.

Ma T C, Yu R R, Chen R J, Zeng H L, Zhang D P. Effect of drought stress simulated with PEG-6000 on root system in rice seedling. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010, 18(6): 1206-1211. (in Chinese)

[23]Agarie S, Hanaoka N, Ueno O, Miyazaki A, Kubota F, Agata W, Kaufman P B. Effects of silicon on tolerance to water deficit and heat stress in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.), monitored by electrolyte leakage. Plant Production Science, 1998, 1: 96-103.

[24]钱琼秋, 宰文姗, 何勇, 王永传, 朱祝军. 外源硅和辅酶Q10对盐胁迫下黄瓜根系线粒体的保护作用. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(6): 1208-1214.

Qian Q Q, Zai W S, He Y, Wang Y C, Zhu Z J. Protection of exogenous silicon and CoQ10 on itochondria in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) roots under salt stress. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(6): 1208-1214. (in Chinese)

[25]Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2010, 33: 453-467.

[26]Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S, Liu L J. Abscisic acid and cytokinins in the root exudates and leaves and their relationship to senescence and remobilization of carbon reserves in rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Planta, 2002, 215: 645-652.

[27]Lee S K, Sohn E Y, Hamayun M, Yoon J Y, Lee I J. Effect of silicon on growth and salinity stress of soybean plant grown under hydroponic system. Agroforest Systems, 2010, 80: 333-340.

[28]Pierce M, Raschke K. Correlation between loss of turgor and accumulation of abscisic acid in detached leaves. Planta, 1980, 148: 174-182.

[29]Shen X, Zhou Y, Duan L, Li Z, Eneji A E, Li J. Silicon effects on photosynthesis and antioxidant parameters of soybean seedlings under drought and ultraviolet-B radiation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2010, 167: 1248-1252.

[30]Verslues P E, Ober E S, Sharp R E. Root growth and oxygen relations at low water potentials. Impact of oxygen availability in polyethylene glycol solutions. Plant Physiology, 1998, 116: 1403-1412.

[31]Tamai K, Ma J F. Characterization of silicon uptake by rice roots. New Phytologist, 2003, 158: 431.

水分胁迫下硅对水稻苗期根系生理生化性状的影响

Effects of Silicon on the Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Roots of Rice Seedlings Under Water Stress

PDF

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	肖德顺, 徐春梅, 王丹英, 章秀福, 陈松, 褚光, 刘元辉. 水培条件下根际氧环境对水稻幼苗磷吸收的影响及其生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 236-248.
[2]	张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263.
[3]	娄义宝,康宏亮,王文龙,沙小燕,冯兰茜,聂慧莹,史倩华. 黄土高原沟壑区沟头植被根系垂直分布及其对土壤抗侵蚀性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 90-103.
[4]	桑世飞,曹梦雨,王亚男,王君怡,孙晓涵,张文玲,姬生栋. 水稻氮高效相关基因的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1479-1491.
[5]	韩晓彤,杨保军,李苏炫,廖福兵,刘淑华,唐健,姚青. 基于图像的水稻纹枯病智能测报方法[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1557-1567.
[6]	巢成生,王玉乾,沈欣杰,代晶,顾炽明,李银水,谢立华,胡小加,秦璐,廖星. 甘蓝型油菜苗期氮高效吸收转运特征研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1172-1188.
[7]	赵凌, 张勇, 魏晓东, 梁文化, 赵春芳, 周丽慧, 姚姝, 王才林, 张亚东. 利用高密度Bin图谱定位水稻抽穗期剑叶叶绿素含量QTL[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 825-836.
[8]	蒋晶晶,周天阳,韦陈华,邬佳宁,张耗,刘立军,王志琴,顾骏飞,杨建昌. 不同栽培措施对超级稻强、弱势粒品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(5): 874-889.
[9]	张亚玲, 高清, 赵羽涵, 刘瑞, 付忠举, 李雪, 孙宇佳, 靳学慧. 黑龙江省水稻种质稻瘟病抗性评价及抗瘟基因结构分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 625-640.
[10]	李龙, 李超男, 毛新国, 王景一, 景蕊莲. 作物根系表型鉴定评价方法的现状与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(3): 425-437.
[11]	陈婷婷, 符卫蒙, 余景, 奉保华, 李光彦, 符冠富, 陶龙兴. 彩色稻叶片光合特征及其与抗氧化酶活性、花青素含量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(3): 467-478.
[12]	赫磊,路凯,赵春芳,姚姝,周丽慧,赵凌,陈涛,朱镇,赵庆勇,梁文化,王才林,朱丽,张亚东. 水稻穗顶端退化突变体paa21的表型分析及基因克隆[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4781-4792.
[13]	房孟颖,卢霖,王庆燕,董学瑞,闫鹏,董志强. 乙矮合剂对不同施氮量夏玉米根系形态构建和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4808-4822.
[14]	杜文婷,雷肖肖,卢慧宇,王云凤,徐佳星,罗彩霞,张树兰. 氮肥减量施用对我国三大粮食作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4863-4878.
[15]	赵春芳,赵庆勇,吕远大,陈涛,姚姝,赵凌,周丽慧,梁文化,朱镇,王才林,张亚东. 半糯粳稻品种核心标记的筛选及DNA指纹图谱的构建[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4567-4582.