中国农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (22): 4166-4176.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.22.020
王劲松1,董二伟1,武爱莲1,白文斌2,王媛1,焦晓燕1()
收稿日期:
2019-05-31
接受日期:
2019-07-01
出版日期:
2019-11-16
发布日期:
2019-11-16
通讯作者:
焦晓燕
作者简介:
王劲松,E-mail:jinsong_wang@126.com
基金资助:
WANG JinSong1,DONG ErWei1,WU AiLian1,BAI WenBin2,WANG Yuan1,JIAO XiaoYan1()
Received:
2019-05-31
Accepted:
2019-07-01
Online:
2019-11-16
Published:
2019-11-16
Contact:
XiaoYan JIAO
摘要:
【目的】研究土壤肥力、施肥及其互作对高粱产量、品质及养分利用的影响,为不同肥力条件下高粱施肥提供理论依据。【方法】 从连续6年长期定位试验的不施肥、氮磷钾配施、氮磷钾结合有机肥和秸秆还田3个处理采集土壤,分别代表低肥力(LSF)、中肥力(MSF)和高肥力(HSF),每个肥力水平设不施肥(NF)和施肥(CF)2个处理,在温室进行盆栽试验。籽粒成熟后每盆单独收获测产,测定并计算地上部及籽粒的氮磷钾养分含量、土壤氮磷钾养分依存率及氮磷钾肥养分利用效率,分析各处理对籽粒中淀粉、单宁及蛋白质含量的影响。【结果】 土壤基础肥力显著影响高粱地上部生物量和籽粒产量,但施肥后LSF、MSF和HSF 3个处理具有相同的生物量和产量。土壤基础肥力对籽粒淀粉含量没有显著影响,不施肥时LSF、MSF及HSF籽粒淀粉含量为67.99%—69.33%;但施肥降低高粱籽粒淀粉含量,随土壤基础肥力的升高,影响更为明显,HSF的CF处理淀粉含量仅为60.75%,比NF处理降低了九个百分点;土壤基础肥力对直链淀粉和支链淀粉比值没有影响。不施肥时LSF籽粒单宁含量最高,达13.69 g·kg -1,MSF和HSF的籽粒单宁含量分别为10.67和10.78 g·kg -1;施肥降低了LSF和HSF处理籽粒单宁含量,降幅达30%;尽管随土壤基础肥力提升籽粒蛋白质含量增加,但不施肥处理蛋白质含量较低,为50.98—68.54 g·kg -1;施肥显著提高了籽粒蛋白质含量,施肥后LSF、MSF和HSF处理的籽粒蛋白质含量分别为108.13、118.13和117.19 g·kg -1。土壤基础肥力显著影响了土壤地力和肥料对籽粒产量贡献率,LSF、MSF和HSF肥力下施肥对产量的贡献率分别为90.2%、51.7%和8.5%。不施肥时随土壤基础肥力提升,籽粒和秸秆中氮磷钾含量增加;与对应土壤基础肥力比较,施肥提高了籽粒和秸秆中氮磷钾养分吸收量,以HSF为例籽粒和秸秆中氮的吸收量分别由319.42和481.63 mg/盆增至597.11和924.92 mg/盆,造成了养分的奢侈吸收,降低了氮磷钾的收获指数,而在LSF和MSF情况下施肥提高了氮磷钾的收获指数。 【结论】 施肥能使低肥力土壤获得最大产量潜力;土壤基础肥力影响籽粒产量,但对籽粒淀粉、单宁和蛋白质含量的影响远远小于施肥;低肥力不施肥籽粒淀粉和单宁含量最高,高肥力施肥明显降低籽粒淀粉和单宁含量;施肥对籽粒蛋白质含量的影响远大于土壤肥力。施肥提高低土壤肥力植株氮磷钾收获指数,降低了高肥力养分收获指数,低肥力土壤合理施肥能实现籽粒高粱产量和品质的协同提高。
王劲松,董二伟,武爱莲,白文斌,王媛,焦晓燕. 不同肥力条件下施肥对粒用高粱产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(22): 4166-4176.
WANG JinSong,DONG ErWei,WU AiLian,BAI WenBin,WANG Yuan,JIAO XiaoYan. Responses of Fertilization on Sorghum Grain Yield, Quality and Nutrient Utilization to Soil Fertility[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 4166-4176.
表1
供试土壤的基础养分状况"
土壤肥力 Soil fertility | 有机质 OM (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N (g·kg-1) | 硝态氮 NO3--N (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K (mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSF | 7.84±0.70 | 0.71±0.01 | 19.44±0.07 | 3.97±0.23 | 145.36±1.34 |
MSF | 8.89±1.03 | 0.95±0.04 | 33.34±0.12 | 6.97±0.52 | 217.72±2.68 |
HSF | 18.48±2.43 | 1.39±0.01 | 70.45±0.29 | 21.23±0.61 | 357.75±1.16 |
表2
不同肥力条件下施肥对籽粒品质的影响"
土壤肥力 Soil fertility | 处理 Treatment | 总淀粉 Total starch (%) | 淀粉组成 | 单宁 Tannic (g·kg-1) | 蛋白质 Protein (g·kg-1) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
直链淀粉 Amylose (%) | 支链淀粉 Amylopectin (%) | |||||
LSF | NF | 69.69±0.47a | 20.66±0.10a | 79.34±0.10a | 13.69±0.86a | 50.98±2.73d |
CF | 67.99±0.53bc | 20.83±0.87a | 79.17±0.87a | 10.53±0.28b | 108.13±2.72b | |
MSF | NF | 69.33±0.52ab | 20.67±0.50a | 79.33±0.50a | 10.67±0.69b | 51.75±0.86d |
CF | 65.50±1.61c | 20.89±0.50a | 79.11±0.50a | 10.07±0.61b | 118.13±2.53a | |
HSF | NF | 69.70±0.27a | 21.32±0.57a | 78.68±0.57a | 10.78±0.34b | 68.54±1.71c |
CF | 60.75±2.13d | 22.45±0.84a | 77.55±0.84a | 7.80±0.42c | 117.19±0.54a | |
土壤肥力Soil fertility (S) | * | NS | NS | ** | ** | |
施肥处理Fertilizer (F) | ** | NS | NS | ** | ** | |
肥力×施肥 S×F | * | NS | NS | NS | ** |
表3
土壤肥力及施肥对高粱养分吸收量及养分收获指数的影响"
土壤处理 Treatment soil | 处理 Treatment | 籽粒吸收量 Accumulation of grain (mg/pot) | 地上部吸收量 Total accumulation above ground (mg/pot) | 收获指数 Harvest index (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | N | P | K | ||
LSF | NF | 24.20±0.49e | 7.13±0.33d | 9.33±0.34e | 58.28±2.56f | 9.54±0.27d | 144.06±5.98e | 41.76±2.78e | 74.90±4.05c | 6.48±0.04c |
CF | 524.87±12.17b | 76.43±5.14b | 100.13±4.64c | 731.26±70.72c | 84.74±5.19b | 731.99±24.56c | 71.76±0.64a | 90.14±1.08a | 13.74±1.01a | |
MSF | NF | 123.86±4.37d | 33.07±1.42c | 51.41±2.24d | 207.61±4.08e | 40.14±2.20c | 455.44±9.36d | 59.63±1.01d | 82.49±0.97b | 11.31±0.70b |
CF | 586.47±15.67b | 87.45±2.52b | 122.07±4.86a | 861.91±21.15b | 98.88±3.81b | 1002.71±14.98b | 68.05±0.93b | 88.50±0.84ab | 12.17±0.30b | |
HSF | NF | 319.42±5.00c | 81.76±2.80b | 103.91±2.20b | 481.63±4.20d | 93.89±1.58b | 1033.12±28.62b | 66.31±0.47b | 87.05±2.08ab | 10.08±0.48b |
CF | 597.11±5.90a | 90.04±1.52a | 116.60±8.51b | 924.92±20.45a | 113.15±1.01a | 1167.32±15.55a | 64.59±0.79bc | 79.59±1.48bc | 9.97±0.60b | |
土壤肥力 Soil fertility (S) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | NS | ** | |
施肥处理 Fertilizer (F) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
肥力×施肥 S×F | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
[1] | 梁涛, 廖敦秀, 陈新平, 王帅, 付登伟, 陈轩敬, 石孝均 . 重庆稻田基础地力水平对水稻养分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(16):3106-3116. |
LIANG T, LIAO D X, CHEN X P, WANG S, FU D W, CHEN X J, SHI X J . Effect of paddy inherent soil productivity on nutrient utilization efficiency of rice in Chongqing. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(16):3106-3116. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 曾祥明, 韩宝吉, 徐芳森, 黄见良, 蔡红梅, 石磊 . 不同基础地力土壤优化施肥对水稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(14):2886-2894. |
ZENG X M, HAN B J, XU F S, HUANG J L, CAI H M, SHI L . Effect of optimized fertilization on grain yield of rice and nitrogen use efficiency in paddy fields with different basic soil fertilities. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(14):2886-2894. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 武红亮, 王士超, 槐圣昌, 闫志浩, 马常宝, 薛彦东, 徐明岗, 卢昌艾 . 近30年来典型黑土肥力和生产力演变特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(6):1456-1464. |
WU H L, WANG S C, HUAI S C, YAN Z H, MA C B, XUE Y D, XU M G, LU C A . Evolutionary characteristics of fertility and productivity of typical black soil in recent 30 years. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018,24(6):1456-1464. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 山仑, 徐炳成 . 论高粱的抗旱性及在旱区农业中的地位. 中国农业科学, 2009,42:2342-2348. |
SHAN L, XU B C . Discussion on drought resistance of sorghum and its status in agriculture in arid and semiarid regions. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009,42:2342-2348. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 中国产业信息 2018年中国高粱价格走势、产量、进口量及进口依存度. (2018-4-10). . |
China's Industrial Information: Tends of Sorghum Price, Total Domestic Production, Import Quota and Sorghum Market Dependence on Import in 2018 of China. ( 2018-4-10). .(in Chinese) | |
[6] | ASSEFA Y, ROOZEBOOM K, THOMPSON C, SCHLEGEL A, STONE L, LINGENFELSER J. Corn and Sorghum Comparison: All Things Considered. Waltham: Academic Press, 2013: 71-86. |
[7] | 徐明岗, 梁国庆, 张夫道 . 中国土壤肥力演变. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2006. |
XU M G, LIANG G Q, ZHANG F D. Variation of Soil Fertility in China. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2006. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 周兴, 聂军, 谢坚, 杨曾平 . 长期不同施肥对红壤性水稻土产量及基础地力的影响. 土壤学报, 2015,52(3):597-606. |
LU Y H, LIAO Y L, ZHOU X, NIE J, XIE J, YANG Z P . Effect of long-term fertilization on rice yield and basic soil productivity in red paddy soil under double-rice system. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015,52(3):597-606. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 李忠芳, 徐明岗, 张会民, 张文菊, 高静 . 长期施肥下中国主要粮食作物产量的变化. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(7):2407-2414. |
LI Z F, XU M G, ZHANG H M, ZHANG W J, GAO J . Grain yield trends of different food crops under long-term fertilization in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009,42(7):2407-2414. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 廖育林, 鲁艳红, 聂军, 谢坚, 周兴, 杨曾平 . 长期施肥稻田土壤基础地力和养分利用效率变化特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(5):1249-1258. |
LIAO Y L, LU Y H, NIE J, XIE J, ZHOU X, YANG Z P . Effects of long-term fertilization on basic soil productivity and nutrient use efficiency in paddy soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016,22(5):1249-1258. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | HAEFELE S M, WOPEREIS M C S, SCHLOEBOHM A M, WIECHMANN H . Long-term fertility experiments for irrigated rice in the West African Sahel: Effect on Soil Characteristics. Field Crops Research, 2004,85:61-77. |
[12] | 韩宝吉, 曾祥明, 卓光毅, 徐芳森, 姚忠清, 肖习明, 石磊 . 氮肥施用措施对湖北中稻产量、品质和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(4):842-850. |
HAN B J, ZENG X M, ZHUO G Y, XU F S, YAO Z Q, XIAO X M, SHI L . Effects of fertilization measures of nitrogen (N) on grain yield, grain quality and N-use efficiency of midseason rice in Hubei province. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011,44(4):842-850. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 王寅, 李小坤, 李雅颖, 李继福, 肖国滨, 郑伟, 袁福生, 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 鲁剑巍 . 红壤不同地力条件下直播油菜对施肥的响应. 土壤学报, 2012 , 49(1):121-129. |
WANG Y, LI X K, LI Y Y, LI J F, XIAO G B, ZHENG W, YUAN F S, LU Y H, LIAO Y L, LU J W . Responses of direct-seeding rapeseed to fertilization in fields of red soil different in fertility. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012,49(1):121-129. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 武际, 郭熙盛, 王允青, 汪建来, 杨晓虎 . 氮磷配施对小麦氮磷、钾养分吸收利用及产量和品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(6):1054-1061. |
WU J, GUO X S, WANG Y Q, WANG J L, YANG X H . Effects of combined application of nitrogen and potassium on absorption of N and K, grain yield and quality of weak gluten wheat. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007,13(6):1054-1061. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 辛励, 刘锦涛, 刘树堂, 陈延玲, 南镇武, 袁铭章, 陈晶培 . 小麦-玉米轮作体系下长期定位秸秆还田对籽粒产量及品质的影响. 华北农学报, 2016,31(6):164-170. |
XIN L, LIU J T, LIU S T, CHEN Y L, NAN Z W, YUAN M Z, CHEN J P . Effects of combined application of straw and organic fertilizer on grain yield and quality under wheat maize rotation system. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2016,31(6):164-170. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 曹昌林, 董良利, 宋学东, 史丽娟 . 氮、磷、钾配施对高粱籽粒淀粉含量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2010(5):68-70. |
CAO C L, DONG L L, SONG X D, SHI L J . Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on starch content in sorghum grains. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2010(5):68-70. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 于泳, 黄瑞冬, 赵尚文, 将文春 . 不同施氮水平对高粱籽粒淀粉累积规律的影响. 作物杂志, 2008(5):20-23. |
YU Y, HUANG R D, ZHAO S W, JIANG W C . Effect of nitrogen application on starch accumulation in sorghum grains. Crops, 2008(5):20-23. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | ZHONG Y X, WANG W L, HUANG X, LIU M M, HEBELSTRUP K H, YANG D L, CAI J, WANG X, ZHOU Q, CAO W X, DAI T B, JIAN D . Nitrogen topdressing timing modifies the gluten quality and grain hardness related protein levels as revealed by iTRAQ. Food Chemistry, 2019,277:135-144. |
[19] | BEILLOUIN D, TREPOS R, GAUFFRETEAU A, JEUFFROY M H . Delayed and reduced nitrogen fertilization strategies decrease nitrogen losses while still achieving high yields and high grain quality in malting barley. European Journal of Agronomy, 2018,101:174-182. |
[20] | 鲁如坤 . 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999. |
LU R K. Analytical Methods for Soil and Agro-Chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 霍权恭, 范璐, 周展明 . 高粱单宁含量的测定(GB/T 15686-2008). 中华人民共和国国家标准. |
HUO Q G, FAN L, ZHOU Z M . Sorghum-Determination of tannin content (GB/T 15686-2008), State Standard of the People's Republic of China.(in Chinese) | |
[22] | 谷物籽粒粗淀粉测定方法(GB 5006-1985), 中华人民共和国国家标准. |
Determination of crude starch in cereals seeds(GB 5006-1985), State Standard of the People's Republic of China. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 水稻、玉米、谷子籽粒淀粉直链淀粉测定法(GB 7684-1987), 中华人民共和国国家标准. |
Determination of amylase in grains of rice , maize and millet(GB 7684-1987), State Standard of the People's Republic of China. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 黄明, 吴金芝, 李友军, 王贺正, 陈明灿, 付国占 . 旱地不同产量水平小麦的产量构成及氮素吸收利用效率. 麦类作物学报, 2019,39(2):163-170. |
HUANG M, WU J Z, LI Y J, WANG H Z, CHEN M C, FU G Z . Differences of yield components and nitrogen uptake and utilization in winter wheat with different yield levels in drylands. Journal of Triticeae Crop, 2019,39(2):163-170. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | GU A J, XIE Y, GAO Y, REN X Y, CHENG C C, WANG S C . Quantitative assessment of soil productivity and predicted impacts of water erosion in the black soil region of northeastern China. Science of the Total Environment, 2018(637/638):706-716. |
[26] | 彭卫福, 吕伟生, 黄山, 曾勇军, 潘晓华, 石庆华 . 土壤肥力对红壤性水稻土水稻产量和氮肥利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(18):3614-3624. |
PENG W F, LÜ W S, HUANG S, ZENG Y J, PAN X H, SHI Q H . Effects of soil fertility on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency in a red paddy soil. Scienta Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(18):3614-3624. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | CHUAN L M, GRANT C, JIN J Y, QIU S J, ZHAO S C, LI S T, ZHOU W, XU X P . Estimating nutrient uptake requirements for wheat in China. Field Crops Research, 2013,146:96-104. |
[28] | 刘璐, 王朝辉, 刁超朋, 王森, 李莎莎 . 旱地不同小麦品种产量与干物质及氮磷钾养分需求的关系. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(3):599-608. |
LIU L, WANG Z H, DIAO C P, WANG S, LI S S . Grain yield of different wheat cultivars and their relations to dry matter and NPK requirement in dryland. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018,24(3):599-608. (in Chinese) | |
[29] | 郝晓宇, 黄芳, 王峥, 张树兰, 杨学云 . 陕西关中不同年代小麦品种产量及氮素吸收利用对土壤肥力的响应. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(23):4769-4780 |
HAO X Y, HUANG F, WANG Z, ZHANG S L, YANG X Y . Responses of grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat cultivars released in different decades to soil fertility in Shaanxi Guanzhong plain. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(23):4769-4780. (in Chinese) | |
[30] | KULP K, JOSEPH G, PONTE JR J G . Handbook of the Cereal Science and Technology. Second ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991: 385-415. |
[31] | 张桂香, 史红梅, 李爱军 . 高粱高淀粉基础材料的筛选及评价. 作物杂志, 2009(1):97-98. |
ZHANG G X, SHI H M, LI A J . Screening and evaluation of sorghum varieties with high starch content. Crops, 2009(1):97-98. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | EBADI M R, SEDGHI M, KAKAHKAI R M . Accurate prediction of nutritional value of sorghum grain using image analysis. British Poultry Science, 2019,60(2):154-160. |
[33] | 郭旭凯, 杨玲, 张福耀, 段冰, 郭睿, 邵强 . 高粱籽粒理化特性与清香型大曲白酒酿造关系的研究, 中国酿造, 2016,35(12):40-43. |
GUO X K, YANG L, ZHANG F Y, DUAN B, GUO R, SHAO Q . Relationship between physicochemical properties of sorghum and fen-flavor Daqu Baijiu fermentation. China Brewing, 2016,35(12):40-43. (in Chinese) | |
[34] | 付雪丽, 王晨阳, 郭天财, 朱云集, 马冬云, 王永华 . 水氮互作对小麦籽粒蛋白质、淀粉含量及其组分的影响. 应用生态学报, 2008,19(2):317-322. |
FU X L, WANG C Y, GUO T C, ZHU Y J, MA D Y, WANG Y H . Effects of water nitrogen interaction on the contents and components protein and starch in wheat grains. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008,19(2):317-322. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | 孙涛, 同拉嘎, 赵书宇, 王海微, 韩云飞, 张忠臣, 金正勋 . 氮肥对水稻胚乳淀粉品质、相关酶活性及基因表达量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2018 , 32(5):475-484. |
SUN T, TONG L G, ZHAO S Y, WANG H W, HAN Y F, ZHANG Z C, JIN Z Y . Effects of Nitrogen fertilizer application on starch quality, activities and gene expression. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018,32(5):475-484. (in Chinese) | |
[36] | KAPLAN M, KARAMAN K, KARDS Y M, KALE H . Phytic acid content and starch properties of maize ( Zea mays L.): Effects of irrigation process and nitrogen fertilizer. Food Chemistry, 2019,283:375-380. |
[37] | 王劲松, 董二伟, 武爱莲, 南江宽, 韩雄, 王立革, 丁玉川, 焦晓燕 . 灌溉时期与施氮量对矮杆高粱产量和品质的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2017,36(增刊2):1-8. |
WANG J S, DONG E W, WU A L, NAN J K, HAN X, WANG L G, DING Y C, JIAO X Y . Effects of irrigation period and nitrogen application rate on dwarf sorghum yield and quality. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017,36(Suppl. 2):1-8. (in Chinese) | |
[38] | 熊淑萍, 王静, 王小纯, 丁世杰, 马新明 . 耕作方式及施氮量对砂浆黑土区小麦氮代谢及籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2014 , 38(7):767-775. |
XIONG S P, WANG J, WANG X C, DING S J, MA X M . Effects of tillage and nitrogen addition rate on nitrogen metabolism, grain yield and protein content in wheat in lime concretion black soil region. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014,38(7):767-775. (in Chinese) | |
[39] | ALI B, SHAH G A, TRAORE B, SHAH S A A, AL-SOLAIMANI S G M, HUSSAIN Q, ALI N, SHAHZAD K, SHAHZAD T, AHMAD A, MUHAMMAD S, SHAH G M, ARSHAD M, HUSSAIN R A, SHAH J A, ANWAR A, AMJID M W, RASHID M I . Manure storage operations mitigate nutrient losses and their products can sustain soil fertility and enhance wheat productivity. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019,241:468-478. |
[40] | 张利华, 林益明, 叶富功, 邵宏波 . 环境因素对植物单宁形成的影响. 鲁东大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,26(4):366-372. |
ZHANG L H, LI Y M, YE F G, SHAO H B . The relationship between vegetable tannins production and environmental factors. Ludong University Journal (Natural Science Edition), 2010,26(4):366-372. (in Chinese) | |
[41] | HALL A B, BLUM U, FITES R C . Stress modification of allelopathy of Helianthus annuus L. debris on seed germination. American Journal of Botany, 1982,69(5):776-783. |
[42] | RAMÍREZ M B, FERRARI M D, LAREO C . Fuel ethanol production from commercial grain sorghum cultivars with different tannin content. Journal of Cereal Science, 2016,69:125-131. |
[1] | 李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616. |
[2] | 李佳燕,孙良杰,马南,王丰,汪景宽. 不同肥力棕壤玉米根茬和茎叶残体碳氮的固定特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(23): 4664-4677. |
[3] | 马超,王玉宝,邬刚,王泓,汪建飞,朱林,李佳佳,马晓静,柴如山. 近十年安徽省秸秆直接还田研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3584-3599. |
[4] | 夏芊蔚,陈浩,姚宇阗,笪达,陈健,石志琦. “优标”水稻体系对稻田土壤环境的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(17): 3343-3354. |
[5] | 王劲松,董二伟,刘秋霞,武爱莲,王媛,王立革,焦晓燕. 行距和密度对籽粒饲用高粱产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3123-3133. |
[6] | 史晓龙,郭佩,任婧瑶,张鹤,董奇琦,赵新华,周宇飞,张正,万书波,于海秋. 基于花生//高粱间作模式的花生盐胁迫耐受性效应研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2927-2937. |
[7] | 刘媛,袁亮,张水勤,赵秉强,李燕婷. 不同分子量聚天冬氨酸对小麦根系生长和养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2526-2537. |
[8] | 解斌,安秀红,陈艳辉,程存刚,康国栋,周江涛,赵德英,李壮,张艳珍,杨安. 不同苹果砧木对持续低磷的响应及适应性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2598-2612. |
[9] | 徐晓,任根增,赵欣蕊,常金华,崔江慧. 中国高粱地方品种和育成品种穗部表型性状精准鉴定及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108. |
[10] | 郭迎新,陈永亮,苗琪,范志勇,孙军伟,崔振岭,李军营. 洱海流域植烟土壤养分时空变异特征及肥力评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1987-1999. |
[11] | 张北举,陈松树,李魁印,李鲁华,徐如宏,安畅,熊富敏,张燕,董俐利,任明见. 基于近红外光谱的高粱籽粒直链淀粉、支链淀粉含量检测模型的构建与应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(1): 26-35. |
[12] | 李顺国,刘猛,刘斐,邹剑秋,陆晓春,刁现民. 中国高粱产业和种业发展现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3): 471-482. |
[13] | 张彦,王劲松,董二伟,武爱莲,王媛,焦晓燕. 中晚熟区主要高粱品种耐瘠性综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23): 4954-4968. |
[14] | 严勇亮,时晓磊,张金波,耿洪伟,肖菁,路子峰,倪中福,丛花. 春小麦籽粒主要品质性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19): 4033-4047. |
[15] | 刘凯,谢英荷,李廷亮,马红梅,张奇茹,姜丽伟,曹静,邵靖琳. 减氮覆膜对黄土旱塬小麦产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12): 2595-2607. |
|