中国农业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (13): 2497-2510.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.13.005

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河流域北部棉区棉花缩节胺化学封顶技术

黎芳1,王希1,王香茹1,杜明伟1,周春江2,尹晓芳3,徐东永3,卢怀玉3,田晓莉1,李召虎1

 
  

  1. 1中国农业大学农学院/植物生长调节剂教育部工程研究中心,北京 100193
    2北京市植物保护站,北京 100029
    3棉花种子工程技术研究中心,河北河间 062450
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-16 出版日期:2016-07-01 发布日期:2016-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 田晓莉,Tel:010-62734550;E-mail:tian_xiaoli@126.com
  • 作者简介:黎芳,E-mail:lucky30608@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-18-18)、国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201203057-02)、中央高校青年教师创新项目(2015QC005)

Cotton Chemical Topping with Mepiquat Chloride Application in the North of Yellow River Valley of China

LI Fang1, WANG Xi1, WANG Xiang-ru1, DU Ming-wei1, ZHOU Chun-jiang2, YIN Xiao-fang3, XU Dong-yong3, LU Huai-yu3, TIAN Xiao-li1, LI Zhao-hu1   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, China Agricultural University/Engineering Research Center of Plant Growth Regulator, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100193
    2Beijing Plant Protection Station, Beijing 100029
    3Research Center for Cotton Seed Engineering Technology, Hejian 062450, Hebei
  • Received:2015-10-16 Online:2016-07-01 Published:2016-07-01

摘要: 【目的】探讨黄河流域北部棉区应用缩节胺(1,1-dimethyl-piperidinium chloride, DPC)对棉花进行化学封顶的可行性。【方法】于2012—2014年在河北省河间市瀛州镇国欣科技园和北京市中国农业大学上庄实验站进行,共包括6个独立试验。供试棉花品种为国欣棉3号(GX3)、欣抗4号(XK4)、石抗126(S126)和欣试17(XS17)。DPC化学封顶技术分为单独应用常规DPC化控技术(简称DPC)、将常规DPC化控技术与增效型DPC(简称DPC+)相结合(简称DPC+DPC+)两种方式,以在常规DPC化控基础上进行人工打顶(简称DPC+MT)为对照。【结果】2012和2013年花铃期(7—8月份)多雨,应用DPC化学封顶技术的棉株较高、新生果枝数较多,其中株高较DPC+MT增加10.6—12.3 cm,果枝数增加5.8—7.9台。2014年花铃期干旱少雨,DPC化学封顶的株高与DPC+MT相比无显著差异,新生果枝数不超过3台。DPC化学封顶对棉花产量的影响不显著,但可发现2012年DPC+DPC+的产量表现出降低趋势,且上部果枝成铃少、新生果枝成铃多,群体熟期有推迟现象。2013和2014年DPC+DPC+的产量和熟期则与对照相当或略有增减。DPC+的应用时间(7月中旬至7月底)和剂量(750—1 500 mL·hm-2)对棉花株型及产量的影响无显著差异,但应避免在结铃盛期(7月底)应用大剂量DPC+(1 500 mL·hm-2),以防延长后期棉铃的成熟。与DPC+DPC+相比,单独应用常规DPC化控技术进行化学封顶在多雨年份或高密度下对棉株的控长强度较弱,而且存在减产风险。【结论】应用DPC进行化学封顶在黄河流域北部棉区基本可行,实际应用时需要根据气象因子和种植密度决定单独应用常规DPC化控技术还是将常规DPC化控技术与增效型DPC的应用相结合。

关键词: 黄河流域北部棉区, 棉花, 缩节胺, 化学封顶

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility of cotton chemical topping with mepiquat chloride (1,1-dimethyl-piperidinium chloride, DPC) application in the North of Yellow River Valley of China. 【Method】This study was conducted with GX3, XK4, S126 and XS17 as materials in Hejian city in Hebei province and at Shangzhuang Experimental Station of China Agricultural University in Beijing from 2012 to 2014, consisting of six independent experiments. The chemical topping with DPC application included conventional DPC (98% soluble powder, provided by Jiangsu Runze Agrochemical Co. Ltd.) application alone and the combination of conventional DPC application with fortified DPC (DPC+, 25% slow-released emulsion, oil in water, developed by Beijing Agricultural Technology Extension Station and Engineering Research Center of Plant Growth Regulator of China Agricultural University, and provided by Xinjiang Golden Cotton Technology Co., Ltd.) application during flowering and fruiting period. These two strategies were hereafter referred to as DPC and DPC+DPC+, respectively. The manual topping accompanied with conventional DPC application was served as control (hereafter referred to as DPC+MT). 【Result】 In 2012 and 2013, characterized by great precipitation during flowering and fruiting period (from July to August), DPC and DPC+DPC+ produced significantly 10.6-12.3 cm higher plant and 5.8-7.9 more sympodials compared with DPC+MT. In 2014, characterized by drought in summer, there were no significant differences in plant height between DPC or DPC+DPC+ and DPC+MT, and the number of sympodials of chemical topping only increased by 0-3 relative to control. DPC and DPC+DPC+ did not significantly affect cotton yield in all experiments, but a reduced yield of DPC+DPC+ was noticed in 2012, companied with the less bolls on the upper sympodials but more bolls on the new sympodials occurred after DPC+ application as well as a delay of maturation. In terms of 2013 and 2014, DPC+DPC+ showed similar yield and maturation to those of DPC+MT. The application time (from mid-July to the end of July) and doses (varying from 750 to 1 500 mL·hm-2) of DPC+ had no significant effects on both plant architecture and cotton yield. While in case of extending the maturity of late bolls, it should be avoided to use large doses of DPC+ at the end of July. Compared with DPC+DPC+, the conventional DPC application alone (DPC) showed a weaker control in terms of plant height and the number of sympodials, and possibly had a risk of reduced yield in rainy years or at higher plant density. 【Conclusion】Cotton chemical topping with the application of DPC or DPC+DPC+ is basically feasible in the North of Yellow River valley of China. And while make a decision whether applying conventional DPC alone or applying DPC+DPC+, the meteorological factor, especially precipitation and plant density should be considered carefully.

Key words: the North of Yellow River valley of China, cotton, mepiquat chloride, chemical topping