中国农业科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (13): 2497-2507.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.13.002

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆苗期耐荫性综合评价及其鉴定指标的筛选

武晓玲,梁海媛,杨峰,刘卫国,佘跃辉,杨文钰   

  1. 四川农业大学农学院,成都 611130
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-05 出版日期:2015-07-01 发布日期:2015-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 杨文钰,E-mail:mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:武晓玲,E-mail:wuxl2014@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-04-PS19)、四川省教育厅育种专项(00128501)、四川农业大学创新训练计划(04060658)

Comprehensive Evaluation and Screening Identification Indexes of Shade Tolerance at Seedling in Soybean

WU Xiao-ling, LIANG Hai-yuan, YANG Feng, LIU Wei-guo, SHE Yue-hui, YANG Wen-yu   

  1. College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130
  • Received:2015-01-05 Online:2015-07-01 Published:2015-07-01

摘要: 【目的】探讨不同基因型大豆苗期的耐荫性,筛选出苗期耐荫性快速鉴定指标,为耐荫大豆品种的鉴定、选育提供依据和材料基础。【方法】通过设置正常光照(1 000 µmol·m-2·s-2)和弱光(400 µmol·m-2·s-2)两种光照环境,在植株生长到20 d时,考察19个参试大豆材料苗期的24个形态、生物量及生理指标,包括株高(plant height,PH)、茎粗(stem diameter,SD)、主茎节数(nodes of main stem,HN)、下胚轴长(hypocotyl length,HL)、叶面积(leaf area,LA)、叶片厚度(leaf thickness,LT)等形态指标,植株各部分干重及总干重,叶绿素a(chlorophyⅡ a,Chla)等光合色素含量,净光合速率(net photosynthetic rate,Pn)、蒸腾速率(transpiration rate,Tr)等光合特征参数,实际荧光(the initial fluorescence(light),Fo′)、最大荧光(maximum fluorescence(light),Fm)等叶绿素荧光参数,以各性状的耐荫系数(处理性状值/对照性状值)作为衡量参试材料耐荫性的指标,应用主成分分析法、隶属函数法、聚类分析和逐步回归分析方法,对大豆苗期的耐荫性进行综合评价。【结果】与对照相比,经弱光处理后,参试材料苗期的各性状变化趋势及幅度不同;通过对24个形态生理指标的相关性分析发现,各指标间都有不同程度的相关性,有的性状间的相关性达到了显著或极显著水平。采用主成分分析将24个单项指标转换为6个相互独立的综合指标,其贡献率分别为30.50%、21.24%、12.00%、10.71%、8.02%和5.18%,代表了全部数据87.65%的信息量。利用隶属函数法计算综合耐荫评价值(D),并对其进行聚类分析,按照耐荫性强弱将19个参试大豆材料划分为3类,即强耐荫型(第Ⅰ类)2个材料、中度耐荫型(第Ⅱ类)5个材料、不耐荫类型(第Ⅲ类)12个材料。进一步通过逐步回归建立了以叶片干重(leaf dry weight,LDW)、气孔导度(stomatal conductance,Gs)、株高和暗下最大荧光产量(maximum fluorescence (dark),Fm)为指标的大豆苗期耐荫性评价数学模型:D =-0.301+0.419LDW+0.169Gs+0.031PH+0.255Fm (R2=0.959),利用建立的最优回归方程对供试材料进行预测,结果与综合评价值(D)基本一致,表明这4个单项指标建立的回归方程用于大豆苗期耐荫性评价具有可行性。综合聚类和逐步回归结果发现,强耐荫类型材料的LDW、Gs、Fm中等,而PH较高,该类型材料的这4个单项指标的耐荫系数均高于其他类型材料。【结论】采用多元统计方法对大豆苗期耐荫性进行评价是可行的,在相同处理条件下,通过测定LDW、Gs、PH和Fm 4个鉴定指标,可进行大豆苗期耐荫性强弱的快速鉴定和预测。

关键词: 大豆, 耐荫性, 主成分分析, 综合评价, 农艺性状

Abstract: 【Objective】The relay-strip intercropping can expand planting area, increase production, and alleviate the domestic imbalance between supply and demand in soybean industry. However, soybean is suffered from shade stress by taller maize at seedling stage in relay-strip intercropping system. Under the shade stress, soybean morphogenesis and some physiological and biochemical characters changed significantly, which induced yield and quality reduction. The aims of this work were to study the shade tolerance of different genotypes, and provide the simple, effective, and suitable evaluation indicators of shade tolerance, and identify shade tolerance at seedling stage, and provide fine basic materials in soybean.【Method】After 20 days of emergence, twenty four morphological, biomass and physiological indexes correlating with shade tolerance of 19 soybean materials were determined under normal light (1 000 µmol·m-2·s-2) and weak light (400 µmol·m-2·s-2), such as plant hight (PH), stem diameter (SD), nodes of main stem (HN), hypocotyl length (HL), leaf area (LA), leaf thickness (LT), dry weight (DW), chlorophyⅡ a content (Chla), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), initial fluorescence (Fo′), maximum fluorescence in light (Fm′) and so on. Shade tolerance coefficient (STC) of all indexes from both treatments were analyzed by using principal component analysis, membership function method, hierarchical cluster analysis and stepwise regression analysis. 【Result】 Compared with the control, the changing trend and range of morphological and physiological index were different. Six independent comprehensive components were obtained from 24 single indexes by principal component analysis, which reflected 87.65% information of all traits information. The contribution ratio of 6 principal component factors were 30.50%, 21.24%, 12.00%, 10.71%, 8.02% and 5.18%, respectively. The comprehensive shade tolerance values (D) were calculated from the membership function methods, and 19 soybean materials were divided into three shade tolerance types by cluster analysis, 2 materials were high shade tolerance type (class Ⅰ), 5 materials were medium shade tolerance type (class Ⅱ), and 12 materials were shade intolerance type (class Ⅲ). A mathematical evaluation model for soybean shade tolerance was established by stepwise regression equation: D=-0.301+0.419LDW+0.169Gs+0.031PH+0.255Fm(R2=0.959). The predictive values (VP) were basically consistent with the comprehensive shade tolerance value (D), which indicated that the use of the four indexes including leaf dry weight (LDW), stomatal conductance (Gs), plant height (PH) and maximum fluorescence in dark (Fm) to predict the shade tolerance in soybean at seedling stage is feasible. The LDW, Gs and PHof high shade tolerance type were intermediate among three types. The PH and STC of the four indexes in high shade tolerance type were the highest.【Conclusion】A comprehensive evaluation system established by multivariate statistics was used to identify shade tolerance at soybean seedling stage. In same condition, four indicators (LDW, Gs, PH, and Fm) can be used for rapid identification and prediction of soybean materials.

Key words: soybean, shade tolerance, membership function method, comprehensive evaluation, agronomic characters