中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 824-833.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.04.009

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

稻田甲烷不完全源于水稻种植的人为贡献

张卫建(), 严圣吉, 尚子吟, 唐志伟, 吴柳格, 李佳锐, 陈浩天, 邓艾兴, 张俊, 张鑫, 郑成岩, 宋振伟   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-22 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-10
  • 联系方式: 张卫建,E-mail:zhangweijian@caas.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国农业科学院科技创新工程(CAAS-CSGLCA-202301); 中国农业科学院科技创新工程(01-ICS-20); 青年创新专项(Y2023QC02); 国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-22-G?16); 全球环境基金捐赠项目(GCP/CPR/065/GFF-10246)

Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields: Not Entirely Attributable to Rice Cultivation

ZHANG WeiJian(), YAN ShengJi, SHANG ZiYin, TANG ZhiWei, WU LiuGe, LI JiaRui, CHEN HaoTian, DENG AiXing, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Xin, ZHENG ChengYan, SONG ZhenWei   

  1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2025-08-22 Published:2026-02-10 Online:2026-02-10

摘要:

温室气体排放清单编制是针对人为排放,因此国际公认的方法学在核算农田氧化亚氮和受淹地甲烷(CH4)排放时,都扣除了其自然背景排放。但是,在稻田温室气体排放核算中,却将稻田CH4全部计量为水稻种植的人为贡献。为此,作者结合实证研究总结、文献综合分析及模型模拟估算,从稻田起源及稻作历史、CH4排放影响因子以及清单编制的核算方法等方面进行深入剖析,区分并估算了我国稻田CH4排放的自然与人为贡献。分析发现,稻田兼有湿地和耕地双重属性,其CH4应该包括自然和人为排放两部分,不能全归咎于人为水稻种植。稻田排放的CH4约为周边湿地的72.2%—123.6%,低洼地与沼泽地等开垦为稻田不仅没有增加,甚至降低了CH4排放。全球湿地修复实践也证明,类似稻田地下水埋深(0—20 cm)的水分管理模式利于湿地CH4减排、土壤固碳及生物多样性保护,表明湿地稻作兼顾了粮食安全与气候友好。机器学习模型估算发现,我国稻田CH4的自然排放占其总排放36%以上,不可忽视。因此,在稻田CH4排放清单编制时,应该参照联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)对农田氧化亚氮和受淹地CH4等排放核算方法,扣除自然背景排放。作为负责任的世界水稻生产大国,我们应该在CH4排放清单编制以及减排行动上积极发声,倡议方法学更新与数据升级。今后需要加强稻田CH4自然排放的基础研究,通过更新核算方法来确保排放清单编制的科学性。其次要实地监测与模型估算等结合,进行数据收集和升级,以降低排放清单及核算的不确定性。另外,还要强化国际合作交流,提升我国及世界水稻主产区在稻田CH4排放核算方法及清单编制标准制定上的国际影响力,科学公平地推进稻田减排固碳行动。

关键词: 水稻生产, 稻田, 湿地, 甲烷, 排放清单, 减排固碳

Abstract:

Greenhouse gas emission inventories specifically target anthropogenic components. Consequently, internationally recognized accounting methodologies deduct natural background emissions when quantifying nitrous oxide from croplands and methane (CH4) from flooded lands. However, in compiling paddy CH4 emission inventories, the entirety of CH4 emitted from rice paddies is currently accounted for as anthropogenic contribution from rice cultivation. Here, through synthesis of empirical research, meta-analysis of published literatures, and model simulations, we analyzed the origins and cultivation history of rice paddies in China, key drivers of CH4 emissions, and fundamental accounting methodologies used in inventory compilation. The goal was to isolate and estimate the natural and anthropogenic contributions to CH4 emissions from rice paddies in China. Our results reveal that rice paddies possess dual attributes of both wetlands and croplands. Their CH4 emissions comprise both natural and anthropogenic components and should not be wholly attributed to human activities. Paddy CH4 emissions were found to be approximately 72.2% to 123.6% of those from their adjacent natural wetlands, indicating that converting low-lying lands and marshes to rice cultivation does not necessarily increase CH4 emissions. Global wetland restoration practices further demonstrate that water management regimes mimicking paddy field conditions during the growing season (groundwater depth 0-20 cm) optimally balance CH4 mitigation with soil carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation, underscoring the rice cultivation potential as a climate-smart land-use practice. Estimates based on machine learning models suggest that natural emissions constitute more than 36% of total paddy CH4 fluxes, a proportion too significant to ignore. Therefore, analogous to the IPCC accounting methodologies for nitrous oxide from croplands and CH4 from flooded lands, natural background emissions should be deducted when compiling paddy CH4 inventories. As a responsible global leader in rice production, China should proactively shape international discourse on CH4 inventory compilation and mitigation strategies. We propose initiating methodological updates and foundational data enhancement by: (1) Strengthening theoretical research to refine accounting methodologies and ensure scientific rigor in inventories; (2) Enhancing foundational data collection through intensified in-situ monitoring and improved model estimation to reduce inventory uncertainty; and (3) Fostering international collaboration and exchange to elevate the influence of China and other major rice-producing nations in shaping global standards for paddy CH4 accounting and inventory compilation, thereby synergistically advancing carbon mitigation and sequestration actions in rice ecosystems.

Key words: rice production, paddy field, wetland, methane, emission inventory, carbon emission mitigation and sequestration