加工番茄高可溶性固形物含量位点的遗传与互作效应分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.09.011

中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (9): 1816-1829.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.09.011

加工番茄高可溶性固形物含量位点的遗传与互作效应分析

张敏¹(), 李鑫¹, 张勇², 钟德萍¹, 鲁晓晓¹, 何淑敏¹, 陈冬红³, 李烨², 李荣霞⁴, 黄泽军¹, 王孝宣¹, 国艳梅¹, 杜永臣¹, 刘洪海²(), 李君明¹(), 刘磊¹()

¹ 中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所/蔬菜生物育种全国重点实验室，北京 100081
² 中基健康产业股份有限公司，乌鲁木齐 830000
³ 巴州伍良农业科技有限公司，新疆焉耆 841100
⁴ 新疆生产建设兵团第六师农业科学研究所，新疆五家渠 831301

收稿日期:2024-12-09 接受日期:2025-01-22 出版日期:2025-05-01 发布日期:2025-05-08
通信作者:
刘洪海，E-mail：1095906533@qq.com。
李君明，E-mail：lijunming@caas.cn。
刘磊，E-mail：liulei02@caas.cn
联系方式: 张敏，E-mail：zhmin978@163.com。
基金资助:
农业农村部园艺作物生物学与种质创制重点实验室项目、兵团科技计划(2024AB022); 国家重点研发项目(2022YFD1200805); 国家自然科学基金(31993118015); 新疆生产建设兵团技术创新人才计划(2023CB019-02)

Genetic and Interaction Analysis of High Soluble Solid Content Loci in Processing Tomato

ZHANG Min¹(), LI Xin¹, ZHANG Yong², ZHONG DePing¹, LU XiaoXiao¹, HE ShuMin¹, CHEN DongHong³, LI Ye², LI RongXia⁴, HUANG ZeJun¹, WANG XiaoXuan¹, GUO YanMei¹, DU YongChen¹, LIU HongHai²(), LI JunMing¹(), LIU Lei¹()

¹ Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Beijing 100081
² Chalks Health Industry Co., Ltd, Urumqi 830000
³ Bazhou Wuliang Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd, Yanqi 841100, Xinjiang
⁴ Institute of Agricultural Science, the Sixth Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Wujiaqu 831301, Xinjiang

Received:2024-12-09 Accepted:2025-01-22 Published:2025-05-01 Online:2025-05-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】利用含有高可溶性固形物含量位点的渐渗系，探明其遗传效应及不同位点间的互作效应，为高品质番茄的遗传改良、基因聚合育种及杂种优势预测提供材料和理论支持。【方法】选取潘那利番茄LA0716和多毛番茄LA1777渐渗群体中9个高可溶性固形物含量近等基因系为试材，通过不完全双列杂交方式获得单杂合与双杂合材料，对其可溶性固形物含量、单果重量和产量等的遗传和互作效应进行系统研究。【结果】遗传效应分析表明，IL7-3所含有的高固形物含量位点多呈显性效应，但同时降低产量的连锁累赘位点也呈显性效应；IL9-2-5所含的高固形物含量位点具有较好的显性效应，且不降低单果重量和产量；IL1-4所含的增加果实产量的QTL呈超显性效应；IL2-6所含的降低单果重量的连锁累赘位点为显性效应。互作效应分析筛选到一系列能够显著影响固形物含量和产量的ILs或位点。其中，IL7-3和IL9-2-5所含的高固形物含量位点具有较好的上位性效应和累加效应，均能显著增加其互作组合的固形物含量，但IL7-3降低产量的连锁累赘影响了其互作组合的产量；IL2-6则能显著降低其互作组合的单果重量；IL5-4-5-44与IL7-5-5能够分别增加其互作组合的单株产量；在染色体上等位的IL1-4和LA3914具有较好的杂种优势效应，能够提高单株产量和园艺产量。园艺产量（可溶性固形物含量与产量的乘积）与单株产量的相关性最高，相关性系数为0.916，说明在固形物含量的遗传改良中需要兼顾产量。【结论】番茄高固形物含量位点的聚合能够在一定程度上提高固形物含量和园艺产量，特别是遗传或生理上具有协同作用的位点互作，能够更加有效提高其互作效应。因此，选择适宜的高固形物含量位点进行聚合育种，是番茄可溶性固形物含量和产量遗传改良的有效途径。

关键词: 番茄, 可溶性固形物, 渐渗系, 遗传效应, 互作效应

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study aimed to explore the genetic effects and the interaction effects by utilizing the introgression lines with high soluble solid content sites, which could provide material and theoretical basis for genetic improvement of high-quality, gene pyramiding, and hybrid vigor prediction of tomatoes. 【Method】 Nine introgression lines (ILs) comprising high-SSC loci of S. pennellii LA0716 (IL1-4, IL2-6, IL4-4, IL5-4-5-44, IL7-3, IL7-5-5, IL8-3, IL9-2-5) and S. habrochaites LA1777 (LA3914) were selected to analyze the effects of genetic, intra-specific, and inter-specific interactions of soluble solids content, fruit weight, and plant yield. 【Result】 As the genetic effects, the high soluble solids loci contained in IL7-3 exhibit dominant effect, while the linkage drag of yield reducing show dominant effect. The high soluble solids loci in IL 9-2-5 exhibit dominant effect also, with the fruit weight and yield do not reduce. The yield increase loci in IL1-4 were over-dominant. The linkage drag loci responsible for reducing fruit weight in IL2-6 were dominant. In the interaction, some ILs or loci that can affect SSC and yield were selected. Such as, IL7-3 and IL9-2-5 have good epistatic and additive effects, both of which can significantly increase SSC in double hybrids, but the yield of double hybrids which contained IL7-3 was also reduced. IL2-6 can reduce the fruit weight of its interaction combination significantly. The yield of double hybrids which has IL5-4-5-44 or IL7-5-5 get increased. The alleles of IL1-4 and LA3914 both have better dominant or super-dominant effects on plant yield and horticultural yield. Our results showed that, the correlation between horticultural yield and plant yield was found to be high (with a correlation coefficient of 0.916). Thus, increasing SSC as part of genetic improvement must be performed under the premise of ensuring high yield.【Conclusion】 The total soluble solid content and horticultural yield could be improved effectively through pyramiding high soluble solids loci. In order to improve their interaction effects more effectively, the interaction of high soluble solids loci which has synergism in genetics and physiology could be better. Therefore, selecting suitable high solid content sites for multigene polymerization breeding is an effective way to improve the soluble solid content and yield of tomatoes.

Key words: tomato, soluble solid, introgression lines, genetic effects, interaction effects

张敏, 李鑫, 张勇, 钟德萍, 鲁晓晓, 何淑敏, 陈冬红, 李烨, 李荣霞, 黄泽军, 王孝宣, 国艳梅, 杜永臣, 刘洪海, 李君明, 刘磊. 加工番茄高可溶性固形物含量位点的遗传与互作效应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(9): 1816-1829.

ZHANG Min, LI Xin, ZHANG Yong, ZHONG DePing, LU XiaoXiao, HE ShuMin, CHEN DongHong, LI Ye, LI RongXia, HUANG ZeJun, WANG XiaoXuan, GUO YanMei, DU YongChen, LIU HongHai, LI JunMing, LIU Lei. Genetic and Interaction Analysis of High Soluble Solid Content Loci in Processing Tomato[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1816-1829.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.09.011

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2025/V58/I9/1816

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 43

[1]	TIEMAN D M, ZEIGLER M, SCHMELZ E A, TAYLOR M G, BLISS P, KIRST M, KLEE H J. Identification of loci affecting flavour volatile emissions in tomato fruits. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006, 57(4): 887-896. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj074 pmid: 16473892
[2]	ZHU G T, WANG S C, HUANG Z J, ZHANG S B, LIAO Q G, ZHANG C Z, LIN T, QIN M, PENG M, YANG C K, CAO X, HAN X, WANG X X, VAN DER KNAAP E, ZHANG Z H, CUI X, KLEE H, FERNIE A R, LUO J, HUANG S W. Rewiring of the fruit metabolome in tomato breeding. Cell, 2018, 172(1/2): 249-261.e12.
[3]	冯岩, 李朝平, 朱龙英, 刘雨婷, 杨学东, 张迎迎, 张辉, 朱为民. 番茄果实可溶性固形物研究进展. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(15): 5158-5163.
	FENG Y, LI C P, ZHU L Y, LIU Y T, YANG X D, ZHANG Y Y, ZHANG H, ZHU W M. Research progress of soluble solids content in tomato. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(15): 5158-5163. (in Chinese)
[4]	LUENGWILAI K, FIEHN O E, BECKLES D M. Comparison of leaf and fruit metabolism in two tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes varying in total soluble solids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58(22): 11790-11800.
[5]	李君明, 徐和金, 周永健. 有关番茄果实中可溶性固形物和番茄红素的研究进展. 园艺学报, 2001, 28 (增刊): 661-668.
	LI J M, XU H J, ZHOU Y J. The advance of the research on soluble solid and lycopene in tomato fruit. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2001, 28 (Suppl.): 661-668. (in Chinese)
[6]	李守明, 王建江, 王诚军, 曾沂辉, 高明, 刘金虎, 祝晏兵. 我国加工番茄产业发展中的技术瓶颈与对策. 中国蔬菜, 2013, 7: 6-8.
	LI S M, WANG J J, WANG C J, ZENG Y H, GAO M, LIU J H, ZHU Y B. Technical bottleneck and countermeasures in the development of processing tomato industry in China. Chinese Vegetables, 2013, 7: 6-8. (in Chinese)
[7]	BAXTER C J, SABAR M, PAUL QUICK W, SWEETLOVE L J. Comparison of changes in fruit gene expression in tomato introgression lines provides evidence of genome-wide transcriptional changes and reveals links to mapped QTLs and described traits. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2005, 56(416): 1591-1604. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri154 pmid: 15851417
[8]	ESHED Y, ZAMIR D. Introgressions from Lycopersicon pennellii can improve the soluble-solids yield of tomato hybrids. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1994, 88(6): 891-897.
[9]	GUR A, SEMEL Y, OSORIO S, FRIEDMANN M, SEEKH S, GHAREEB B, MOHAMMAD A, PLEBAN T, GERA G, FERNIE A R, ZAMIR D. Yield quantitative trait loci from wild tomato are predominately expressed by the shoot. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 122(2): 405-420. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1456-9 pmid: 20872209
[10]	ESHED Y, ZAMIR D. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics, 1995, 141(3): 1147-1162.
[11]	BAXTER C J, CARRARI F, BAUKE A, OVERY S, HILL S A, QUICK P W, FERNIE A R, SWEETLOVE L J. Fruit carbohydrate metabolism in an introgression line of tomato with increased fruit soluble solids. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2005, 46(3): 425-437.
[12]	KANAYAMA Y. Sugar metabolism and fruit development in the tomato. The Horticulture Journal, 2017, 86(4): 417-425.
[13]	BERNACCHI D, BECK-BUNN T, EMMATTY D, ESHED Y, INAI S, LOPEZ J, PETIARD V, SAYAMA H, UHLIG J, ZAMIR D, TANKSLEY S. Advanced back-cross QTL analysis of tomato: II. Evaluation of near-isogenic lines carrying single-donor introgressions for desirable wild QTL-alleles derived from Lycopersicon hirsutum and L. pimpinellifolium. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1998, 97(7): 1191-1196.
[14]	LIPPMAN Z B, SEMEL Y, ZAMIR D. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 2007, 17(6): 545-552.
[15]	IKEDA H, HIRAGA M, SHIRASAWA K, NISHIYAMA M, KANAHAMA K, KANAYAMA Y. Analysis of a tomato introgression line, IL8-3, with increased Brix content. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 153: 103-108.
[16]	GUR A, ZAMIR D. Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLoS Biology, 2004, 2(10): e245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020245 pmid: 15328532
[17]	MUIR C D, MOYLE L C. Antagonistic epistasis for ecophysiological trait differences between Solanum species. New Phytologist, 2009, 183(3): 789-802.
[18]	LI J M. Screening of wild relatives for enhanced stress tolerance in tomato[D]. The Netherlands: Wageningen University, 2010.
[19]	PRASANNA H C, SINHA D P, RAI G K, KRISHNA R, KASHYAP S P, SINGH N K, SINGH M, MALATHI V G. Pyramiding Ty-2 and Ty-3 genes for resistance to monopartite and bipartite tomato leaf curl viruses of India. Plant Pathology, 2015, 64(2): 256-264.
[20]	BHARANI M, NAGARAJAN P, RABINDRAN R, SARASWATHI R, BALASUBRAMANIAN P, RAMALINGAM J. Bacterial leaf blight resistance genes (Xa21, xa13andxa5) pyramiding through molecular marker assisted selection into rice cultivars. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 2010, 43(10): 1032-1043.
[21]	CAICEDO A L, STINCHCOMBE J R, OLSEN K M, SCHMITT J, PURUGGANAN M D. Epistatic interaction between Arabidopsis FRI and FLC flowering time genes generates a latitudinal cline in a life history trait. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(44): 15670-15675.
[22]	WANG Y, ZANG J P, SUN Y, ALI J, XU J L, LI Z K. Background-independent quantitative trait loci for drought tolerance identified using advanced backcross introgression lines in rice. Crop Science, 2013, 53(2): 430-441.
[23]	TANKSLEY S D. The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. The Plant Cell, 2004, 16(Suppl.): S181-S189.
[24]	SACCO A, DI MATTEO A, LOMBARDI N, TROTTA N, PUNZO B, MARI A, BARONE A. Quantitative trait loci pyramiding for fruit quality traits in tomato. Molecular Breeding, 2013, 31(1): 217-222. doi: 10.1007/s11032-012-9763-2 pmid: 23316114
[25]	TIEMAN D, ZHU G T, RESENDE M F R Jr, LIN T, NGUYEN C, BIES D, RAMBLA J L, BELTRAN K S O, TAYLOR M, ZHANG B, IKEDA H, LIU Z Y, FISHER J, ZEMACH I, MONFORTE A, ZAMIR D, GRANELL A, KIRST M, HUANG S W, KLEE H. A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor. Science, 2017, 355(6323): 391-394. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1556 pmid: 28126817
[26]	CALAFIORE R, ALIBERTI A, RUGGIERI V, OLIVIERI F, RIGANO M M, BARONE A. Phenotypic and molecular selection of a superior Solanum pennellii introgression sub-line suitable for improving quality traits of cultivated tomatoes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 190.
[27]	赵统敏, 余文贵, 杨玛丽, 赵丽萍. 番茄可溶性固形物含量的主基因＋多基因遗传分析. 江苏农业学报, 2010, 26(3): 572-576.
	ZHAO T M, YU W G, YANG M L, ZHAO L P. Genetic analysis of soluble solid content using mixed major gene plus polygenes inheritance model in tomato. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 26(3): 572-576. (In Chinese)
[28]	周永健, 徐和金. 番茄几个主要加工性状的遗传分析. 遗传, 1990, 12(2): 1-3.
	ZHOU Y J, XU H J. A genetic of several main processing characteristics in tomato. Hereditas (Beijing), 1990, 12(2): 1-3. (in Chinese)
[29]	FRIDMAN E, LIU Y S, CARMEL-GOREN L, GUR A, SHORESH M, PLEBAN T, ESHED Y, ZAMIR D. Two tightly linked QTLs modify tomato sugar content via different physiological pathways. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2002, 266(5): 821-826. doi: 10.1007/s00438-001-0599-4 pmid: 11810256
[30]	XU X Y, MARTIN B, COMSTOCK J P, VISION T J, TAUER C G, ZHAO B G, PAUSCH R C, KNAPP S. Fine mapping a QTL for carbon isotope composition in tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2008, 117(2): 221-233. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0767-6 pmid: 18542914
[31]	MONFORTE A J, TANKSLEY S D. Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) from Lycopersicon hirsutum chromosome 1 affecting fruit characteristics and agronomic traits: Breaking linkage among QTLs affecting different traits and dissection of heterosis for yield. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000, 100(3): 471-479.
[32]	SEMEL Y, NISSENBAUM J, MENDA N, ZINDER M, KRIEGER U, ISSMAN N, PLEBAN T, LIPPMAN Z, GUR A, ZAMIR D. Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(35): 12981-12986.
[33]	FRIDMAN E, CARRARI F, LIU Y S, FERNIE A R, ZAMIR D. Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science, 2004, 305(5691): 1786-1789. doi: 10.1126/science.1101666 pmid: 15375271
[34]	MOYLE L C, NAKAZATO T. Complex epistasis for Dobzhansky- Muller hybrid incompatibility in Solanum. Genetics, 2009, 181(1): 347-351.
[35]	SANDHU N, SINGH A, DIXIT S, STA CRUZ M T, MATURAN P C, JAIN R K, KUMAR A. Identification and mapping of stable QTL with main and epistasis effect on rice grain yield under upland drought stress. BMC Genetics, 2014, 15: 63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-63 pmid: 24885990
[36]	SHEN G J, ZHAN W, CHEN H X, XING Y Z. Dominance and epistasis are the main contributors to heterosis for plant height in rice. Plant Science, 2014, 215: 11-18.
[37]	YE G Y, SMITH K F. Marker-assisted gene pyramiding for cultivar development. Plant Breeding Reviews, 2009, 33: 219-256.
[38]	杨自凤. 基于SSSL的水稻抽穗期基因的等位基因变异及上位性分析[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2020.
	YANG Z F. Allele variation and epistasis analysis of rice heading date genes based on SSSL[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[39]	CHEN J B, LI X Y, CHENG C, WANG Y H, QIN M, ZHU H T, ZENG R Z, FU X L, LIU Z Q, ZHANG G Q. Characterization of epistatic interaction of QTLs LH8 and EH3 controlling heading date in rice. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4: 4263. doi: 10.1038/srep04263 pmid: 24584028
[40]	SOYK S, MÜLLER N A, PARK S J, SCHMALENBACH I, JIANG K, HAYAMA R, ZHANG L, VAN ECK J, JIMÉNEZ-GÓMEZ J M, LIPPMAN Z B. Variation in the flowering gene SELF PRUNING 5G promotes day-neutrality and early yield in tomato. Nature Genetics, 2017, 49(1): 162-168.
[41]	LU J H, PAN C Y, LI X, HUANG Z J, SHU J S, WANG X X, LU X X, PAN F, HU J L, ZHANG H, SU W Y, ZHANG M, DU Y C, LIU L, GUO Y M, LI J M. OBV (obscure vein), a C₂H₂ zinc finger transcription factor, positively regulates chloroplast development and bundle sheath extension formation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaf veins. Horticulture Research, 2021, 8(1): 230.
[42]	PETREIKOV M, SHEN S, YESELSON Y, LEVIN I, BAR M, SCHAFFER A A. Temporally extended gene expression of the ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase large subunit (AgpL1) leads to increased enzyme activity in developing tomato fruit. Planta, 2006, 224(6): 1465-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0316-y pmid: 16770584
[43]	ZAMIR D. Plant breeders go back to nature. Nature Genetics, 2008, 40: 269-270. doi: 10.1038/ng0308-269 pmid: 18305476

加工番茄高可溶性固形物含量位点的遗传与互作效应分析

Genetic and Interaction Analysis of High Soluble Solid Content Loci in Processing Tomato

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 43

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张亚封, 董伟进, 李启云, 路杨, 张正坤, 隋丽. 球孢白僵菌与钾元素互作对番茄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(6): 1131-1144.
[2]	王少骅, 沈年桥, 储天然, 吴永汉, 李康宁, 石延霞, 谢学文, 李磊, 范腾飞, 李宝聚, 柴阿丽. 浙江苍南番茄-水稻轮作对连作土壤理化性质和微生物群落的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 692-703.
[3]	孙昭安, 张译文, 江丽华, 李昭君, 郭鑫, 曹慧, 孟凡乔. 番茄嫁接和施氮对氮肥去向和氮平衡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(4): 755-764.
[4]	张桂芬, 万坤, 潘梦妮, 王龙, 黄聪, 王玉生, 张毅波, 冼晓青, 杨念婉, 桂富荣, 刘万学, 万方浩. 番茄潜叶蛾种群定殖与种群重建及延续能力研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3): 514-524.
[5]	裴书瑶, 曹红霞, 张泽宇, 赵方洋, 李志军. 盆栽番茄对NaCl和Na₂SO₄微咸水灌溉的生理响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3): 570-583.
[6]	马佳, 彭杰丽, 贾楠, 王旭, 王占武, 胡栋. 低温胁迫下链霉菌TOR3209对番茄叶绿素荧光特性和叶黄素循环的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(22): 4522-4540.
[7]	李杰, 梁郅林, 孙燕, 檀根甲, 怀宝玉. SlSnRK1.2调控番茄抗灰霉病功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(21): 4238-4247.
[8]	辛朗, 宋嘉雯, 付媛媛, 唐茂淞, 敬凌琨, 王兴鹏. 咸淡水轮灌对设施番茄光合特性及叶片超微结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(19): 3784-3798.
[9]	李玉姗, 肖菁, 马越, 田超, 赵连佳, 王帆, 宋羽, 蒋程瑶. 169份番茄种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(18): 3671-3683.
[10]	赵卓超, 曹昊天, 周子昕, 曲佳乐, 李泽, 许明杨, 杨琪薇, 张斌, 王宁泽, 吴永振, 孙晗, 秦冉, 赵春华, 崔法. 1BL·1RS染色体对小麦产量和品质相关性状的遗传效应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(16): 3116-3126.
[11]	游敏, 陈劲松, 陈俨俨, 杨平, 张春晖, 黄峰. 添加不同比例番茄对炖制牛肉食用品质和氧化效应的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(15): 3071-3082.
[12]	王愿, 都梦丹, 李正刚, 佘小漫, 于琳, 蓝国兵, 丁善文, 何自福, 汤亚飞. 广东省番茄白尖曲叶病病原鉴定及其致病性分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(12): 2350-2363.
[13]	曹珂, 陈昌文, 杨选文, 别航灵, 王力荣. 桃果实单果重及可溶性固形物含量的全基因组选择分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(5): 951-963.
[14]	刘明慧, 田虹雨, 刘之广, 巩彪. 减磷条件下含褪黑素的尿素缓释功能肥对番茄生长、产量、品质和磷素利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(3): 519-528.
[15]	殷子贺, 杨成成, 赵钰慧, 赵丽, 吕秀荣, 杨振超, 武永军. 开花期番茄circRNA的测序分析及功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(21): 4288-4303.