甘蓝型油菜光叶性状的遗传分析及基因定位

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.04.003

中国农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 650-662.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.04.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇下一篇

甘蓝型油菜光叶性状的遗传分析及基因定位

关志林¹^,²(), 靳丰蔚¹, 刘婷婷¹, 王毅¹, 谭莹莹², 杨春慧², 李蕊彤², 王博³, 刘克德², 董云¹()

¹ 甘肃省农业科学院作物研究所，兰州 730070
² 华中农业大学作物遗传改良全国重点实验室，武汉 430070
³ 武汉基诺赛克科技有限公司，武汉 430070

收稿日期:2023-07-14 接受日期:2023-08-30 出版日期:2024-02-16 发布日期:2024-02-20
通信作者:
董云，E-mail：dongyungs@163.com。
联系方式: 关志林，E-mail：zhilinggg@163.com。
基金资助:
甘肃省科技计划重大项目(21ZD4NA022); 国家自然科学基金(31960436); 甘肃省农业科学院院列项目(2022GAAS54); 甘肃省农业科学院院列项目(2021GAAS13); 甘肃省农业科学院院列项目(2021GAAS43); 甘肃省农业科学院院列项目(2023GAAS43)

Genetic Analysis and Gene Mapping of Glossy Leaf in Brassica napus

GUAN ZhiLin¹^,²(), JIN FengWei¹, LIU TingTing¹, WANG Yi¹, TAN YingYing², YANG ChunHui², LI RuiTong², WANG Bo³, LIU KeDe², DONG Yun¹()

¹ Crop Research Institute of Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070
² National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic and Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070
³ Wuhan Genoseq Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430070

Received:2023-07-14 Accepted:2023-08-30 Published:2024-02-16 Online:2024-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】表皮蜡质是覆盖植物叶片和茎秆等部位的疏水层，在植物抵御逆境方面发挥着重要作用，同时会影响光合作用和生长发育;甘蓝型油菜作为世界上主要的油料作物之一，研究表皮蜡质突变体的遗传机制，为实现油菜高产稳产提供参考。【方法】对油菜光叶突变体M8和普通蜡质叶中双11（ZS11）和C20的叶片表征进行记载，使用便携式植物光合作用测量系统测定叶片光合速率;利用M8和ZS11、C20分别杂交获得2个F₁、自交构建2个F₂分离群体，用于分析油菜光叶性状的遗传规律;选取M8和ZS11杂交的F₂群体中光叶和蜡质叶表型单株分别进行混池，通过集团分离分析法结合靶向测序技术进行基因克隆，结合比较基因组和转录组数据进行候选基因预测，并通过RT-PCR验证候选基因。【结果】甘蓝型油菜光叶表型叶片气孔导度更大、光合效率更高;遗传分析表明M8光叶性状受1对基因控制，光叶相对蜡质叶为隐性。图位克隆将光叶控制基因定位至A08染色体0.134-0.699 Mb物理区间内。进一步分析发现，相比于ZS11，光叶突变体M8中A08染色体0.22-0.58 Mb区间存在大片段缺失，ZS11在该区段中的BnaA08G0006900ZS（BnaA08.SAGL1）可能为光叶的候选基因，该基因编码一个Kelch-F-box蛋白，在ZS11叶片中表达量高而M8中未检测到，该基因缺失可能导致了M8光叶表型。【结论】甘蓝型油菜光叶新突变体M8相比野生型蜡质叶片光合速率更高，该光叶表型受1对隐性基因控制;图位克隆鉴定到光叶性状调控基因为BnaA08.SAGL1，基因缺失产生了光叶表型。

关键词: 甘蓝型油菜, 光叶, 蜡质, 图位克隆, BnaA08.SAGL1

Abstract:

【Objective】Epicuticular waxes is a hydrophobic layer covering plant leaves and stems, playing an important role in stress resistance and affecting photosynthesis, growth and development. Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) is one of the main oil crops in the world, but the mechanism of epicuticular waxes formation on its leaves is still unclear. This study aims to reveal the genetic mechanism of epicuticular wax on leaves through a mutant, which will help to achieve high and stable yield of rapeseed.【Method】In this study, leaf of glossy leaf mutant M8 and common waxy leaf inbred lines Zhongshuang 11 (ZS11) and the C20 were characterized, and its photosynthetic rate were measured by portable plant photosynthesis measurement system. Two F₁ hybrids and F₂ segregating populations were constructed by crossing the M8 with ZS11 and C20, respectively, and were used to analyze the heredity of leaf characters in rapeseed. The F₂ population hybridized by M8 and ZS11 was constructed to analyze the genetic regulation of the glossy leaf trait in rapeseed by bulked segregation analysis (BSA) combined with Target-sequencing (Target-seq). Combined with comparative genome and transcriptome database, candidate genes were predicted and then verified by RT-PCR.【Result】The leaf stomatal conductance and photosynthetic efficiency were higher in the glossy leaf mutant M8, compared with ZS11 in rapeseed. The genetic analysis results showed that the glossy leaf was controlled by one pair of recessive genes and glossy leaf was recessive compared with waxy leaf. It was finally fine mapped in the physical region of 0.134-0.699 Mb on chromosome A08 by map based cloning method. Further analysis revealed that there was a large segmental deletion in the 0.22-0.58 Mb region of chromosome A08 in the M8 glossy leaf mutant compared to ZS11, and BnaA08G0006900ZS (BnaA08.SAGL1) in this region of the genome was identified as the candidate gene for the glossy leaf trait. This gene encodes a Kelch-F-box protein, and its deletion may lead to the observed glossy leaf trait in the M8 mutant, as it was highly expressed in ZS11 but none in M8. 【Conclusion】Compared with wild-type waxy leaves, the photosynthetic rate of the new glossy leaf mutant M8 was higher, and the glossy leaf phenotype was controlled by a recessive gene. In the picture, the glossy leaf phenotype regulatory gene was identified as BnaA08.SAGL1, and deletion of the gene resulted in glossy leaf in rapeseed.

Key words: Brassica napus L., glossy leaf, epicuticular wax, map-based gene cloning, BnaA08.SAGL1

关志林, 靳丰蔚, 刘婷婷, 王毅, 谭莹莹, 杨春慧, 李蕊彤, 王博, 刘克德, 董云. 甘蓝型油菜光叶性状的遗传分析及基因定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(4): 650-662.

GUAN ZhiLin, JIN FengWei, LIU TingTing, WANG Yi, TAN YingYing, YANG ChunHui, LI RuiTong, WANG Bo, LIU KeDe, DONG Yun. Genetic Analysis and Gene Mapping of Glossy Leaf in Brassica napus[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(4): 650-662.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.04.003

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2024/V57/I4/650

图/表 9

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

图4

表3

表4

图5

参考文献 40

[1]	JENKS M A, ANDERSEN L, TEUSINK R S, WILLIAMS M H. Leaf cuticular waxes of potted rose cultivars as affected by plant development, drought and paclobutrazol treatments. Physiologia Plantarum, 2001, 112(1): 62-70. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120109.x
[2]	WANG H H, HAO J J, CHEN X J, HAO Z N, WANG X, LOU Y G, PENG Y L, GUO Z J. Overexpression of rice WRKY89 enhances ultraviolet B tolerance and disease resistance in rice plants. Plant Molecular Biology, 2007, 65(6): 799-815. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9244-x
[3]	KUNST L, SAMUELS A L. Biosynthesis and secretion of plant cuticular wax. Progress in Lipid Research, 2003, 42(1): 51-80.
[4]	RIEDERER M, SCHREIBER L. Protecting against water loss: Analysis of the barrier properties of plant cuticles. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2001, 52(363): 2023-2032. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.363.2023 pmid: 11559738
[5]	ZHU L, GUO J S, ZHU J, ZHOU C. Enhanced expression of EsWAX1 improves drought tolerance with increased accumulation of cuticular wax and ascorbic acid in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2014, 75: 24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.11.028
[6]	LEE S B, SUH M C. Advances in the understanding of cuticular waxes in Arabidopsis thaliana and crop species. Plant Cell Reports, 2015, 34(4): 557-572. doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1772-2
[7]	SAMUELS L, KUNST L, JETTER R. Sealing plant surfaces: Cuticular wax formation by epidermal cells. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59: 683-707. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.103006.093219 pmid: 18251711
[8]	JENKS M A, TUTTLE H A, EIGENBRODE S D, FELDMANN K A. Leaf epicuticular waxes of the eceriferum mutants in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 1995, 108(1): 369-377. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.1.369
[9]	RASHOTTE A M, JENKS M A, FELDMANN K A. Cuticular waxes on eceriferum mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry, 2001, 57(1): 115-123. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00513-6
[10]	ROWLAND O, ZHENG H Q, HEPWORTH S R, LAM P, JETTER R, KUNST L. CER4 encodes an alcohol-forming fatty acyl-coenzyme A reductase involved in cuticular wax production in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2006, 142(3): 866-877. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.086785
[11]	YANG X P, ZHAO H Y, KOSMA D K, TOMASI P, DYER J M, LI R J, LIU X L, WANG Z Y, PARSONS E P, JENKS M A, LÜ S Y. The acyl desaturase CER17 is involved in producing wax unsaturated primary alcohols and cutin monomers. Plant Physiology, 2017, 173(2): 1109-1124. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01956
[12]	POLLARD M, BEISSON F, LI Y H, OHLROGGE J B. Building lipid barriers: Biosynthesis of cutin and suberin. Trends in Plant Science, 2008, 13(5): 236-246. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.003 pmid: 18440267
[13]	SCHUSTER A C, BURGHARDT M, ALFARHAN A, BUENO A, HEDRICH R, LEIDE J, THOMAS J, RIEDERER M. Effectiveness of cuticular transpiration barriers in a desert plant at controlling water loss at high temperatures. AoB PLANTS, 2016, 8: plw027. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plw027
[14]	ISAACSON T, KOSMA D K, MATAS A J, BUDA G J, HE Y H, YU B W, PRAVITASARI A, BATTEAS J D, STARK R E, JENKS M A, ROSE J K C. Cutin deficiency in the tomato fruit cuticle consistently affects resistance to microbial infection and biomechanical properties, but not transpirational water loss. The Plant Journal, 2009, 60(2): 363-377. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03969.x pmid: 19594708
[15]	KOCH K, HARTMANN K D, SCHREIBER L, BARTHLOTT W, NEINHUIS C. Influences of air humidity during the cultivation of plants on wax chemical composition, morphology and leaf surface wettability. Environment and Experimental Botany, 2006, 56(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.09.013
[16]	SUN W, LI Y, ZHAO Y X, ZHANG H. The TsnsLTP4, a nonspecific lipid transfer protein involved in wax deposition and stress tolerance. Plant Molecular Biology Reports, 2015, 33(4): 962-974. doi: 10.1007/s11105-014-0798-x
[17]	BONAVENTURE G, SALAS J J, POLLARD M R, OHLROGGE J B. Disruption of the FATB gene in Arabidopsis demonstrates an essential role of saturated fatty acids in plant growth. The Plant Cell, 2003, 15(4): 1020-1033. doi: 10.1105/tpc.008946
[18]	LEWANDOWSKA M, KEYL A, FEUSSNER I. Wax biosynthesis in response to danger: Its regulation upon abiotic and biotic stress. The New Phytologist, 2020, 227(3): 698-713. doi: 10.1111/nph.v227.3
[19]	FIEBIG A, MAYFIELD J A, MILEY N L, CHAU S, FISCHER R L, PREUSS D. Alterations in CER6, a gene identical to CUT1, differentially affect long-chain lipid content on the surface of pollen and stems. The Plant Cell, 2000, 12(10): 2001-2008. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.10.2001
[20]	BERNARD A, JOUBÈS J. Arabidopsis cuticular waxes: Advances in synthesis, export and regulation. Progress in Lipid Research, 2013, 52(1): 110-129. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2012.10.002
[21]	AHARONI A, DIXIT S, JETTER R, THOENES E, VAN ARKEL G, PEREIRA A. The SHINE clade of AP2 domain transcription factors activates wax biosynthesis, alters cuticle properties, and confers drought tolerance when overexpressed in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2004, 16(9): 2463-2480. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.022897
[22]	BROUN P, POINDEXTER P, OSBORNE E, JIANG C Z, RIECHMANN J L.WIN1, a transcriptional activator of epidermal wax accumulation in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(13): 4706-4711.
[23]	BIRD D, BEISSON F, BRIGHAM A, SHIN J, GREER S, JETTER R, KUNST L, WU X W, YEPHREMOV A, SAMUELS L. Characterization of Arabidopsis ABCG11/WBC11, an ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter that is required for cuticular lipid secretion. The Plant Journal, 2007, 52(3): 485-498. doi: 10.1111/tpj.2008.52.issue-3
[24]	LIU D M, TANG J, LIU Z Z, DONG X, ZHUANG M, ZHANG Y Y, LV H H, SUN P T, LIU Y M, LI Z S, YE Z B, FANG Z Y, YANG L M.Cgl2 plays an essential role in cuticular wax biosynthesis in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata). BMC Plant Biology, 2017, 17(1): 223-232.
[25]	ZHANG X, LIU Z Y, WANG P, WANG Q S, YANG S, FENG H.Fine mapping of BrWax1, a gene controlling cuticular wax biosynthesis in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Molecular Breeding, 2013, 32(4): 867-874.
[26]	WANG X Y, ZHI P F, FAN Q X, ZHANG M, CHANG C. Wheat CHD 3 protein TaCHR729 regulates the cuticular wax biosynthesis required for stimulating germination of Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2019, 70(2): 701-713.
[27]	祝利霞. 甘蓝型油菜黄化和光叶突变体的基因定位及克隆[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2014.
	ZHU L X. Mapping and cloning the gene in chlorophyii-deficient and glossy mutants in Brassica napus L.[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[28]	刘杰. 甘蓝型油菜光叶基因的克隆和功能分析[D]. 华中农业大学, 2020.
	LIU J. Map-based cloning and functional analysis of the glossy gene in Brassica napus[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[29]	DOYLE J, DOYLE J L, DOYLE J, DOYLE F J. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull, 1987, 19: 11-15.
[30]	MICHELMORE R W, PARAN I, KESSELI R V. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: A rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1991, 88(21): 9828-9832.
[31]	BOLGER A M, LOHSE M, USADEL B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(15): 2114-2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 pmid: 24695404
[32]	VASIMUDDIN M, MISRA S, LI H, ALURU S.Efficient architecture-aware acceleration of BWA-MEM for multicore systems. 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). May 20-24, 2019, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. IEEE, 2019: 314-324.
[33]	SONG J M, GUAN Z L, HU J L, GUO C C, YANG Z Q, WANG S, LIU D X, WANG B, LU S P, ZHOU R, XIE W Z, CHENG Y F, ZHANG Y T, LIU K D, YANG Q Y, CHEN L L, GUO L A. Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Brassica napus. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(1): 34-45. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0577-7
[34]	MCKENNA A, HANNA M, BANKS E, SIVACHENKO A, CIBULSKIS K, KERNYTSKY A, GARIMELLA K, ALTSHULER D, GABRIEL S, DALY M, DEPRISTO M A. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next- generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research, 2010, 20(9): 1297-1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110
[35]	WANG K, LI M Y, HAKONARSON H. ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, 38(16): e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603
[36]	MANSFELD B N, GRUMET R. QTLseqr: An R package for bulk segregant analysis with next-generation sequencing. The Plant Genome, 2018, 11(2): 180006. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2018.01.0006
[37]	YANG Z Q, WANG S B, WEI L L, HUANG Y M, LIU D X, JIA Y P, LUO C F, LIN Y C, LIANG C Y, HU Y, DAI C, GUO L, ZHOU Y M, YANG Q Y.BnIR: A multi-omics database with various tools for Brassica napus research and breeding. Molecular Plant, 2023, 16(4): 775-789.
[38]	KIM H, YU S I, JUNG S H, LEE B H, SUH M C. The F-box protein SAGL1 and ECERIFERUM3 regulate cuticular wax biosynthesis in response to changes in humidity in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2019, 31(9): 2223-2240. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00152
[39]	莫鉴国, 李万渠, 彭云强, 余勤. 甘蓝型油菜无蜡粉种质材料的改良以及在杂优育种上的应用. 种子, 1999, 18(5): 18-20.
	MO J G, LI W Q, PENG Y Q, YU Q. Improvement and application of waxless germplasm material (B. napus L.) in heterosis. Seed, 1999, 18(5): 18-20. (in Chinese)
[40]	周熙荣, 李树林, 庄静, 顾龙弟. 甘蓝型油菜(Brassica napus L.)无蜡粉隐性核不育两型系的选育. 上海农业学报, 2002, 18(1): 20-24.
	ZHOU X R, LI S L, ZHUANG J, GU L D. Selection and breeding of waxless two-type line of recessive genic male sterility in Brassica napus L.. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2002, 18(1): 20-24. (in Chinese)

杂交组合 Combination	父本 Male parent	母本 Female parent	世代 Generation	光叶 Glossy leaf	蜡质叶 Waxy leaf	期望分离 Expect separation	卡方值 Chi-square value (χ² _0.05=3.84)
组合1 Group 1	M8	ZS11	F₁	0	15
组合1 Group 1	M8	ZS11	F₂	95	348	1﹕3	2.80
组合2 Group 2	M8	C20	F₁	0	13
组合2 Group 2	M8	C20	F₂	109	275	1﹕3	2.17

标记 Marker	物理位置 Physical position (bp)	参考基因型 Reference (ZS11)	变异类型 Alternative (M8)	正向引物 Forward primer (5′-3′)	反向引物 Reverse primer (5′-3′)	产物大小 Product size (bp)
P1	133863	C	T	TTACAGCAACGAAGTATGGTGTTATTTCACTT	AGTTTAAGTCTCATCAAACTCTTGATTTCTCC	249
P2	260976	A	G	GATGATCGTGCCAAGGAGTACGTAAG	AACAAAGAAAGAGAATAGTCTAGGTAACTTGC	238
P3	374500	A	T	TACTTCTTCTATACATGGAACGTGACTTATGG	GGCAACCCTATTAAGATCTACTAAGACCA	240
P4	495084	C	T	GTTATAAGTTGTGCTGATGTTTTTAAGTTGCT	GTTCTATGCTTCTTCTTGCCATATCTTTTGAC	249
P5	698791	C	G	GCATATTCACAGGAACATTAAGAAAATGTGTT	TCGGTTAGTTTGATTTGAAATTTGGTTAGTTC	241
P6	791230	A	G	CCCTGAAGGTAAAAGACAGTAAACAGATTTAG	AGCTCTCTTGCTGGTCTTCTATTAATCTT	252
P7	926323	G	C	CTTGACGAACGATGATAGTTTGAAGAGGAT	ATACAAGTTAAAGAAAGAGACTTTGCTCTGTT	265
P8	1105382	A	T	ATAATCGCTACCGATCAAGACGATATAAAGTT	TTTCGTAGTAAACATAACCTTGATATTTTGCG	249
P9	1213167	A	G	AATAAGTCTAATCTCCCGTTACCTTTGAGATG	AATCTTAAGTATGTGTTGGTGTTTTGTTTCAG	240
P10	1321158	A	C	CAGCACATCTTTGTCAAAATCAGATGAGAAAT	GATCATAAGCTATTGATGTAACTACGAGAAGC	266
P11	2025748	T	C	ACTTCTTTTATTCCATTCCCAATCAATTTTGT	GAGAGGTAGAGAACTTGGTCGATGG	230
P12	2315309	T	C	TAGAAGTAATTATCTAGACAACGGAGGAACA	AAACATAACAATTAAGTTATCGAGACATGGGG	238
P13	2400688	G	T	ACAACACAGTTCCCTTATTCAAAAACTTATCT	AAGTACTAATCTTTGTTGAATCTGTGGTCTTC	230
P14	2493038	T	C	GAAAACAAAACTAAAATTGTTTGGAATGTGG	GATAATTCTACCATCATATGAGAATGCACGTC	255
P15	2579076	G	T	ATGTGGTTCTAATTTGCAATGCTACATTTCTG	TTATTCACCCTATAGTTGATTTTGGTTGACAG	230
P16	2725088	A	G	GTTTATTTTATATTAGGCATGGGCATTTCACC	TATACTAGAAGTTTCAGATTTTCGGATACCCT	191

片段 Fragment	物理位置 Physical position (bp)	正向引物 Forward primer (5′-3′)	反向引物 Reverse primer (5′-3′)	产物大小 Product size (bp)
Fr.1	A08:229280..230322	CTTCCTACGATCACTGCGATTG	CATCGTCTACTGCATAGCTGAGAAT	1042
Fr.2	A08:262560..263824	GCTTCTACCACGTACCCACTTC	TTGGCAACTCGCACGTCT	1264
Fr.3	A08:311145..312544	CATATTCCTCGGTCAACATTGTC	CGAAATTGTATCCACCTGCAT	1399
Fr.4	A08:351515..353298	TTGATTCGGGCTAGCTAAAAGG	TGTTGACACGATTTAGCCTTAACC	1783
Fr.5	A08:395942..396849	TCAGATTCTCACTCTCACCATTG	ATCCAAGTGTGCCATACAGAAC	907
Fr.6	A08:450159..452784	GATTAAATCCTTGGGTTGCAC	GACGGCGTGTGATTCAGAAGC	2625
Fr.7	A08:482496..484254	TATCGTCTAACTCAGCTCCAAGTG	GGTTCTAAGGTCATAGCGTCCAT	1758
Fr.8	A08:585642..586731	GGGCGTGATGAACTCTTTCTAT	GCTCATGCCGCTTCTCAAC	1089
Fr.9	A08:631190..632007	TCATCCGCCTCGCATTGTG	TCATTATTGACAAGTGCATACGTG	817

引物名称 Primer name	引物序列 Primer sequence (5′-3′)
Actin-BnENTH-F	GTTTAGACCCGTTGCTGCTC
Actin-BnENTH-R	TTGTCCATCTCAGCCATTTG
qBnaA08.SAGL1-F	ACCTGATATGCTCAGGAAGAGAC
qBnaA08.SAGL1-R	CATCACTAACCGGACTCCATG
qBnaC03.SAGL1-F	TATGGATTGGATTGTAGGGACG
qBnaC03.SAGL1-R	TTACTGAGAATGCCCTTTGACT
qBnaA02.CER3-F	TGCGAAGAGACTCTTTTGTTTG
qBnaA02.CER3-R	TACATTTTGTTTCCCTGCTTGC
qBnaC02.CER3-F	CGTTTACAACAACATGCTTTGG
qBnaC02.CER3-R	TTCGTGATCAATCTGTTGAACG

甘蓝型油菜光叶性状的遗传分析及基因定位

Genetic Analysis and Gene Mapping of Glossy Leaf in Brassica napus

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	赵梓钧, 吴如会, 王硕, 张君, 游静, 段倩楠, 唐俊, 张新芳, 韦秘, 刘金艳, 李云峰, 何光华, 张婷. 水稻PDL2的突变导致小穗外稃退化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(7): 1248-1259.
[2]	朱洪慧, 李映姿, 高远卓, 林泓, 王成洋, 晏紫仪, 彭瀚平, 李田野, 熊茂, 李云峰. 水稻短宽粒基因SWG1的图位克隆[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(7): 1260-1274.
[3]	范军强, 武军艳, 刘丽君, 马骊, 杨刚, 蒲媛媛, 李学才, 孙万仓. 甘蓝型冬油菜气孔特性与抗寒性的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(4): 599-618.
[4]	臧新山, 王康文, 张先亮, 王雪平, 王军, 梁雨, 裴小雨, 任翔, 吕宇龙, 高宇, 王星星, 彭云玲, 马雄风. 棉花功能基因图位克隆的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(23): 4635-4647.
[5]	胡盛,李阳阳,唐章林,李加纳,曲存民,刘列钊. 干旱胁迫下甘蓝型油菜籽粒含油量和蛋白质含量变化的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 17-30.
[6]	巢成生,王玉乾,沈欣杰,代晶,顾炽明,李银水,谢立华,胡小加,秦璐,廖星. 甘蓝型油菜苗期氮高效吸收转运特征研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1172-1188.
[7]	谢伶俐,韦丁一,章子爽,徐劲松,张学昆,许本波. 甘蓝型油菜发育进程中赤霉素动态变化及其与产量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(24): 4793-4807.
[8]	段雅如,高美玲,郭宇,梁晓雪,刘秀杰,徐洪国,刘继秀,高越,栾非时. 西瓜果形基因图位克隆及分子标记开发[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(14): 2812-2824.
[9]	朱智锋,刘萍,许让伟,陈传武,邓崇岭,牛英,朱壹,王鹏蔚,邓秀新,程运江. 树冠覆膜对沙糖橘采后保鲜性能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12): 2630-2643.
[10]	王刘艳,王瑞莉,叶桑,郜欢欢,雷维,陈柳依,吴家怡,孟丽姣,袁芳,唐章林,李加纳,周清元,崔翠. 苯磺隆胁迫下甘蓝型油菜萌发期关联性状的QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(8): 1510-1523.
[11]	陈雪,王瑞,井付钰,张胜森,贾乐东,段谋正,吴宇. 基于二代测序的甘蓝型油菜白花基因候选区间定位及连锁标记验证[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(6): 1108-1117.
[12]	万华方,魏帅,冯宇霞,钱伟. 以六倍体（AⁿAⁿCⁿCⁿC^oC^o）为桥梁创制抗旱新型甘蓝型油菜（AⁿA^rCⁿC^o）[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(16): 3225-3234.
[13]	万华方,丁一娟,陈致富,梅家琴,钱伟. 利用野生甘蓝改良油菜Ogu CMS恢复材料的菌核病抗性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(10): 1950-1958.
[14]	杨光圣,辛强,董发明,洪登峰. 一种简化的油菜杂交F₁种子的生产方法[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(8): 1334-1340.
[15]	周佳琴,朱俊兆,杨思学,诸周洁,姚婕,郑文娟,朱世华,丁沃娜. 水稻根系发育基因OsKSR7 的克隆与功能分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5): 777-785.