早花露地小菊杂交后代株系的综合评价与筛选

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.01.012

中国农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (1): 173-189.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.01.012

早花露地小菊杂交后代株系的综合评价与筛选

宋想(), 王钟曼(), 张秋玲, 魏媛媛, 赵小刚, 刘波, 戴思兰()

北京林业大学园林学院/北京市林木分子设计育种高精尖创新中心/花卉种质创新与分子育种北京市重点实验室/城乡生态环境北京实验室/林木花卉遗传育种教育部重点实验室/国家花卉工程技术研究中心，北京 100083

收稿日期:2023-04-26 接受日期:2023-09-01 出版日期:2024-01-01 发布日期:2024-01-10
通信作者:
戴思兰，E-mail：silandai@sina.com
联系方式: 宋想，E-mail：songxiangbjfu@163.com。王钟曼，E-mail：wangzhongman9801@163.com。宋想和王钟曼为同等贡献作者。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32371948); 国家自然科学基金(32171849); 北京市科技计划(Z191100008519002)

Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Early Flowering Spray Outdoor Chrysanthemum

SONG Xiang(), WANG ZhongMan(), ZHANG QiuLing, WEI YuanYuan, ZHAO XiaoGang, LIU Bo, DAI SiLan()

School of Landscape and Architecture, Beijing Forestry University/Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design/Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Breeding/Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment/Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Tree and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education/National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083

Received:2023-04-26 Accepted:2023-09-01 Published:2024-01-01 Online:2024-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】建立早花露地小菊综合评价体系，筛选出花期为9月中旬至10月中旬、花色接近纯正红色或黄色、花型和株型等综合表现优异的株系，丰富华北地区早秋节庆用花。为进一步培育早花露地小菊新品种提供育种材料和选择方法。【方法】以露地小菊3个早花亲本和1个重瓣性高且花色鲜艳亲本及其25个经田间初选的杂交后代无性株系为供试材料，划分花色、花期、花型、株型和叶型5个层次，从观测的30个原始性状中筛选出18个关键性状指标作为评价因子，利用层次分析法及K-Means聚类分析法建立综合评价体系，开展杂种株系的综合筛选。【结果】以早花、花型圆整丰满、红黄两种花色稳定为育种目标确定了层次分析法各性状的权重值，其中初花期起始时间（0.1817）权重值最大，其次是花色稳定性（0.1695）、盛花期单株着花数量（0.1383）、开花持续时间（0.1301），再次是花色适宜度（0.0565）、盛花期着花整齐度（0.0565）、花序直径（0.0539）、舌状花数量（0.0574）。通过K-Means聚类分析法将29份材料划分为3个等级，Ⅰ级10个（34.38%），Ⅱ级11个（37.93%），Ⅲ级8个（27.59%）；杂交子代性状分离广泛，花色、花型和株型均出现了超亲性状，但花期仍以2个早花亲本初花期最早，符合前人研究认为花期为多基因控制的数量性状。因此，早花露地小菊育种仍需筛选更多亲本，增加可早秋使用的露地小菊资源。【结论】本评价方法综合各类评价体系优势，以数量化结果充分表征田间观测的性状特征，以育种目标为导向进行层次分析赋值评价，为综合评价和筛选早花露地小菊优良品种提供了量化方法。建立的评价体系可以很好地对早花露地小菊进行评价与筛选，为后期早花露地小菊新品种的选育提供了一种可靠方法，有助于提高后代优良种质筛选效率。最终筛选出10个观赏性状优良的早花露地小菊株系，可作为新品种或新品系应用，也可作为育种材料。

关键词: 露地小菊, 杂交后代, 综合评价, 层次分析法, K-Means聚类分析, 早花性状

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of this study was to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for early flowering garden chrysanthemums, and to select plant lines with flowering periods from mid-September to mid-October, of which flower colors were close to pure red or yellow with novel flower type, round plant shape and excellent comprehensive performance to enrich ornamentals for early autumn festivals in Northen China, so as to provide breeding materials and selection methods for further breeding of early flowering garden chrysanthemum. 【Method】Using 3 early-flowering parents and 1 high double-flowering parent with bright color of small flowered chrysanthemum and 25 asexual hybrid progenies as test materials, 30 original traits were observed from 5 aspects, including flower color, flowering period, flower type, plant type, and leaf type. The selected 18 key traits were used as evaluation factors, and then a comprehensive evaluation system was established using Analytic Hierarchy Process and K-Means clustering analysis to conduct the comprehensive screening of hybrid lines. 【Result】The weight values of each trait of analytic hierarchy process were determined with the breeding objectives of early flowering, round flower type, and stable red and yellow flower color. Among them, the weight value of the initial flowering time (0.1817) was the largest, followed by the flower color stability (0.1695), the number of flowers per plant in the full flowering period (0.1383), the flowering duration (0.1301), the flower color suitability (0.0565), the flower uniformity in the full flowering period (0.0565 ), the inflorescence diameter (0.0539), and the number of ligulate flowers (0.0574). The 29 materials were divided into 3 grades by K-Means clustering analysis: 10 in grade I, 11 in grade II, and 8 in grade III, accounting for 34.38%, 37.93% and 27.59%, respectively. The traits of the hybrid progeny were widely separated, and the flower color, flower type, and plant type all showed transgressive traits, but the flowering period was still the earliest in the two early flowering parents, which was in line with the previous studies that the flowering period was a quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes. Therefore, the early flowering breeding still needs to screen parents and increase the resources of open-field small chrysanthemums that can be used in early autumn. 【Conclusion】 This evaluation method integrated the advantages of various evaluation systems, characterized the traits observed in the field with quantitative results, and conducted hierarchical analysis and evaluation guided by breeding objectives, which provided a quantitative method for comprehensive evaluation and screening of excellent varieties of early flowering garden chrysanthemum. The data analysis results indicated that the evaluation system established in this study could effectively evaluate and screen early flowering garden chrysanthemums, providing a reliable method for the breeding of new varieties of early flowering garden chrysanthemums, and helping to improve the efficiency of selecting excellent germplasm for future breeding project. Finally, 10 early flowering garden chrysanthemum strains with excellent ornamental traits were selected, which could be used as new varieties or strains and also as further breeding materials.

Key words: spray outdoor chrysanthemum, hybrid offsprings, comprehensive evaluation, analytic hierarchy process, K-Means cluster analysis, early flowering characters

宋想, 王钟曼, 张秋玲, 魏媛媛, 赵小刚, 刘波, 戴思兰. 早花露地小菊杂交后代株系的综合评价与筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(1): 173-189.

SONG Xiang, WANG ZhongMan, ZHANG QiuLing, WEI YuanYuan, ZHAO XiaoGang, LIU Bo, DAI SiLan. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Early Flowering Spray Outdoor Chrysanthemum[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(1): 173-189.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.01.012

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2024/V57/I1/173

图/表 16

图1

表1

图2

表2

图3

表3

图4

表4

图5

表5

图6

图7

图8

表6

表7

露地小菊18个关键性状评分标准"

性状 Trait	分值Score
性状 Trait	1	2	3	4	5
P1初花期起始时间 The starting time of the initial flowering period	极晚花期 Very late flowering period	晚花期 Late flowering period	中花期 Mid-flowering period	早花期 Early flowering period	极早花期 Very early flowering period
P2开花持续时间 Flowering duration	<25	25—30	30—40	40—50	>50
P3盛花期单株着花数量 Number of capitulum per plant at full-bloom stage	<30	30—40	40—50	60—90	>90
P4盛花期着花整齐度 Flowering uniformity in full-bloom period	花朵分布不均，枝条间存在较大距离 The distribution of flowers is uneven, and there is a large distance between branches	介于二者之间 Between the two	花朵分布较均匀，相邻花朵间存在一定距离 The flowers are evenly distributed, and there is a certain distance between adjacent flowers	介于二者之间 Between the two	花朵分布均匀繁密，覆盖上表面 The flowers are evenly distributed and dense, covering the upper surface
P5花色适宜度 Flower color suitability	花色偏白 The flower color is white	花色较浅 Lighter color of flowers	花色呈较艳丽的粉色 The flower color is more gorgeous pink	花色艳丽，向红色或黄色靠拢 Colorful, close to red or yellow	较纯正的红色或明亮黄色 Purer red or bright yellow
P6花色稳定性 Flower color stability	-	出现变色现象 There is a discoloration phenomenon	-	-	颜色稳定 Stable color
P7花序直径（花径）Capitulum diameter	<4.0	4.0—4.5	4.5—5.0	5.0—5.5	>5.5
P8花心直径 Flower center diameter	2.0—2.5	1.5—2.0	1.0—1.5	0.75—1.0	0—0.75
P9舌状花形态（瓣型） Ligulate flower shape (petal type)	-	-	平瓣 Flat petals	匙瓣或管瓣/ 平瓣有龙骨或有缺刻 Spatulate petal or tubular petal / Flat petal with keel There may be a gap	匙瓣或管瓣附有龙骨或缺刻 Spatulate petal or tubular petal with keel or incised
P10舌状花数量 Number of ligulate flowers	25—50	50—100	100—150	150—200	>200
P11舌状花轮数（重瓣性） Number of ligulate flower wheels (double valve)	2—3	4—5	7	8	>9
P12冠幅Crown breadth	<25	25—30	30—35	35—40	>40
P13株高Plant height	<35	35—45	45—50	50—55	>55
P14分枝数 Number of branching	2	3	4	5	>6
P15圆整度 Roundness	植株不圆整 The plant is not rounded	介于二者之间 Between the two	植株较圆整 The plant is rounder	介于二者之间 Between the two	植株圆整 The plant is rounded
P16茎秆强度（抗倒伏能力） Stem strength（lodging resistance）	茎秆强度弱 Stem strength is weak	介于二者之间 Between the two	茎秆强度居中 Stem strength is in the middle	介于二者之间 Between the two	茎秆强度强 Stem strength is strong
P17叶片长度Blade length	<4	4—5	5—6	6—7	>7
P18叶片长宽比 Blade aspect ratio	-	长卵型或倒卵型 Long egg type or Inverted egg type	卵型 Egg-type	宽卵型 Wide egg type	-

表7

表8

参考文献 41

[1]	赵倩茹, 房伟民, 管志勇, 陈发棣, 滕年军. 切花小菊49个品种绿心特性分析和综合评价标准的构建. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(12): 2338-2350. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2017-0403
	ZHAO Q R, FANG W M, GUAN Z Y, CHEN F D, TENG N J. Analysis of green-center characteristics and establishment of green-center comprehensive evaluation standard for 49 spray cut Chrysanthemum cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(12): 2338-2350. (in Chinese)
[2]	CHO L H, YOON J, AN G. The control of flowering time by environmental factors. The Plant Journal, 2017, 90(4): 708-719. doi: 10.1111/tpj.2017.90.issue-4
[3]	张玉鸽. 盆栽大菊品种开花期特性的遗传分析及早花品种选育[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2020.
	ZHANG Y G. Genetic analysis of flowering characters and breeding of early-flowering varieties of large-chrysanthemum[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[4]	张秋玲, 刘海鹏, 高康. 盆栽菊花反季节开花调控技术研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021(9): 62-67.
	ZHANG Q L, LIU H P, GAO K. Research on anti-seasonal flowering control technology of potted chrysanthemum. 2021(9): 62-67. (in Chinese)
[5]	陈发棣, 房伟民, 赵宏波, 管志勇. 菊花新品种: 国庆盆栽小菊系列. 园艺学报, 2005, 32(2): 377.
	CHEN F D, FANG W M, ZHAO H B, GUAN Z Y. New varieties of Guoqing potted Chrysanthemum with small inflorescences. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2005, 32(2): 377. (in Chinese)
[6]	赵耀. 早花期地被菊杂交育种研究[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2013.
	ZHAO Y. Studies on early flowering varieties breeding by ground- cover chrysanthemum[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[7]	ZHANG M M, HUANG H, WANG Q, DAI S L. Cross breeding new cultivars of early-flowering multiflora Chrysanthemum based on mathematical analysis. HortScience, 2018, 53(4): 421-426. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI12769-17
[8]	孔德元, 赵小刚, 张蒙蒙, 高康, 张秋玲, 李艳飞, 戴思兰, 季玉山, 王朔, 刘昊. 小菊新品种‘东篱秋红’. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(S2): 2877-2878.
	KONG D Y, ZHAO X G, ZHANG M M, GAO K, ZHANG Q L, LI Y F, DAI S L, JI Y S, WANG S, LIU H. A new muitiflora chrysanthemum cultivar ‘Dongli Qiuhong’. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(S2): 2877-2878. (in Chinese)
[9]	梁良. 基于改进层次分析法小麦籽粒优劣分级技术研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2013.
	LIANG L. Research about quality grading of wheat grain based on improved AHP[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[10]	王江民, 钱均祥, 许宗亮, 曾彪, 马玲, 冷燕, 孙信梅, 王家金, 张智慧. 应用层次分析法确定鲜食玉米品质指标的优先等级. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(9): 2192-2196.
	WANG J M, QIAN J X, XU Z L, ZENG B, MA L, LENG Y, SUN X M, WANG J J, ZHANG Z H. Determination of quality grades of fresh-eating maize by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(9): 2192-2196. (in Chinese)
[11]	孙霞枫. 现代月季品种综合评价体系的初步研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2009.
	SUN X F. The preliminary studies on comprehensive evaluation system of modern garden rose cultivars[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2009. (in Chinese)
[12]	宁云芬, 贾蕊, 荣涛, 汪勐炜. 基于层次分析法的盆栽东方百合品种综合评价体系构建. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(4): 669-674.
	NING Y F, JIA R, RONG T, WANG M W. Establishing comprehensive evaluation system for potted Oriental lily cultivars based on analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2017, 48(4): 669-674. (in Chinese)
[13]	王青, 戴思兰, 何晶, 季玉山, 王朔. 灰色关联法和层次分析法在盆栽多头小菊株系选择中的应用. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(17): 3653-3660. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.17.024.
	WANG Q, DAI S L, HE J, JI Y S, WANG S. Application of grey correlation analysis and AHP method in selection of potted Chrysanthemum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(17): 3653- 3660. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.17.024. (in Chinese)
[14]	高康, 宋雪彬, 戴思兰, 季玉山, 王朔. 基于AHP法的大菊杂种F₁代新品种筛选// 中国观赏园艺研究进展, 2016: 118-124.
	GAO K, SOHG X B, DAI S L, JI Y S, WANG S. AHP-based screening of traditional chrysanthemum hybrid F₁ for new variety// Advances in Ornamental Horticulture of China, 2016: 118-124. (in Chinese)
[15]	赵小刚, 张蒙蒙, 黄河, 戴思兰. 基于聚类分析的小菊品种间亲缘关系分析// 中国观赏园艺研究进展. 2018: 173-179.
	ZHAO X G, ZHANG M M, HUANG H, DAI S L. Cluster analysis of relationship between multi-chrysanthemum// Advances in Ornamental Horticulture of China, 2018: 173-179. (in Chinese)
[16]	WU X Y, ZHAO X G, GAO K, TIAN Y K, ZHANG M M, ANDERSON N O, DAI S L. Heterosis and mixed genetic analysis of flowering traits in cross breeding of day-neutral Chrysanthemum (Asteraceae). Agronomy, 2023, 13(8): 2107. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13082107
[17]	赵志慧, 张玉鸽, 高康, 田园凯, 张秋玲, 方志军, 王朔, 刘昊, 季玉山, 戴思兰. 大菊品种花期和主要观赏性状的变异及相关性分析. 植物科学学报, 2023, 41(2): 214-223.
	ZHAO Z H, ZHANG Y G, GAO K, TIAN Y K, ZHANG Q L, FANG Z J, WANG S, LIU H, JI Y S, DAI S L. Variation and correlation analysis of florescence and main ornamental traits of Chrysanthemum × morifolium Ramat. varieties. Plant Science Journal, 2023, 41(2): 214-223. (in Chinese)
[18]	朱德宁, 韩宇, 房伟民, 陈发棣, 陈素梅, 邓波, 管志勇. 多花型园林小菊品质评价与品种筛选. 南京农业大学学报, 2018, 41(2): 266-274.
	ZHU D N, HAN Y, FANG W M, CHEN F D, CHEN S M, DENG B, GUAN Z Y. Studies on the quality evaluation and variety selection of multi-flower garden chrysanthemum. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2018, 41(2): 266-274. (in Chinese)
[19]	马婉茹, 房伟民, 王海滨, 张飞, 陈素梅, 陈发棣, 管志勇. 多头切花菊品种茎、枝特性评价体系构建与品种评价. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(14): 2515-2524. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.14.010.
	MA W R, FANG W M, WANG H B, ZHANG F, CHEN S M, CHEN F D, GUAN Z Y. Establishment of appraisal system for the stem and branch characteristics and varieties evaluation of spray cut Chrysanthemum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(14): 2515-2524. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.14.010. (in Chinese)
[20]	韩勇, 叶燕萍, 陈发棣, 房伟民, 陈素梅, 姚建军, 管志勇, 王春昕. 多头切花菊品质性状综合评价体系构建. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(20): 4265-4271. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.20.014.
	HAN Y, YE Y P, CHEN F D, FANG W M, CHEN S M, YAO J J, GUAN Z Y, WANG C X. Establishment of synthetic assessing system for the quality of spray cut Chrysanthemum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(20): 4265-4271. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.20.014. (in Chinese)
[21]	中华人民共和国农业农村部. 中华人民共和国国家标准植物品种特异性、一致性和稳定性测试指南—菊花[S], 2019.
	Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People’s Republic of China. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × morifolium Ramat.)[S], 2019. (in Chinese)
[22]	赵小刚. 日中性小菊新品种选育及小菊开花期遗传分析[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2019.
	ZHAO X G. Breeding of day-neutral multiflora chrysanthemum and genetic analysis of flowering time[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[23]	SAATY T L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1): 9-26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
[24]	梁文怡. 园林小菊与‘皇菊’杂交后代群体的筛选与评价[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.
	LIANG W Y. Screening and evaluation of hybrid progeny of garden Chrysanthemum ×‘Huangju’[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[25]	张玉鸽, 高康, 刘芷兰, 宋雪彬, 戴思兰. 不同开花期大菊品种观赏性状综合分析// 中国观赏园艺研究进展, 2018: 42-50.
	ZHANG Y G, GAO K, LIU Z L, SONG X B, DAI S L. Analysis of florescence ornamental characters on Chrysanthemum cultivars// Advances in Ornamental Horticulture of China, 2018: 42-50. (in Chinese)
[26]	白新祥. 菊花花色形成的表型分析[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2007.
	BAI X X. Phenotype analysis of flower coloration of Chrysanthemum ×morifolium Ramat.[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2007. (in Chinese)
[27]	洪艳, 白新祥, 孙卫, 贾锋炜, 戴思兰. 菊花品种花色表型数量分类研究. 园艺学报, 2012, 39(7): 1330-1340.
	HONG Y, BAI X X, SUN W, JIA F W, DAI S L. The numerical classification of Chrysanthemum flower color phenotype. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2012, 39(7): 1330-1340. (in Chinese)
[28]	BRUGLIERA F, TAO G Q, TEMS U, KALC G, MOURADOVA E, PRICE K, STEVENSON K, NAKAMURA N, STACEY I, KATSUMOTO Y, TANAKA Y, MASON J G. Violet/blue chrysanthemums-metabolic engineering of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway results in novel petal colors. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2013, 54(10): 1696-1710. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct110
[29]	WANG L S, SHIRAISHI A, HASHIMOTO F, AOKI N, SHIMIZU K, SAKATA Y. Analysis of petal anthocyanins to investigate flower coloration of Zhongyuan (Chinese) and Daikon island (Japanese) tree peony cultivars. Journal of Plant Research, 2001, 114(1): 33-43. doi: 10.1007/PL00013966
[30]	GONNET J F. CIELab measurement, a precise communication in flower colour: An example with carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) cultivars. Journal of Horticultural Science, 1993, 68(4): 499-510. doi: 10.1080/00221589.1993.11516378
[31]	SONG X B, GAO K, FAN G X, ZHAO X G, LIU Z L, DAI S L. Quantitative classification of the morphological traits of ray florets in large-flowered Chrysanthemum. HortScience, 2018, 53(9): 1258-1265. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI13069-18
[32]	宋雪彬. 菊花品种表型性状的数量化定义及其遗传分析[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2018.
	SONG X B. Quantitative definition and genetic analysis of morphological traits of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × morifolium Ramat.)[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[33]	宋雪彬, 高康, 黄河, 刘芷兰, 戴思兰, 嵇彧. 中国传统大菊叶片形态的数量化定义与分类. 植物学报, 2021, 56(1): 10-24.
	SONG X B, GAO K, HUANG H, LIU Z L, DAI S L, JI Y. Quantitative definition and classification of leaves in large-flowered Chinese Chrysanthemum based on the morphological traits. Bulletin of Botany, 2021, 56(1): 10-24. (in Chinese)
[34]	邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 陈俊羊, 赵俊峰. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
	DENG X, LI J M, ZENG H J, CHEN J Y, ZHAO J F. Research on computation methods of AHP wight vector and its applications. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(7): 93-100. (in Chinese)
[35]	ZHANG Y M, LIAN L J, LIU Q, XIAO N, FANG R X, LIU Q L, CHEN X Y. Altered expression of CmNRRa changes flowering time of Chrysanthemum morifolium. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2013, 11(3): 373-379. doi: 10.1111/pbi.2013.11.issue-3
[36]	WEI Q, MA C, XU Y J, WANG T L, CHEN Y Y, LÜ J, ZHANG L L, JIANG C Z, HONG B, GAO J P. Control of chrysanthemum flowering through integration with an aging pathway. Nature Communications, 2017, 8: 829. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00812-0 pmid: 29018260
[37]	李娜娜, 张德平, 朱珺, 戴思兰. 利用层次分析法初选单头切花菊杂种F₁代优良单株的研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(2): 129-135.
	LI N N, ZHANG D P, ZHU J, DAI S L. A study on the primary selection of single flower cutting chrysanthemum hybrid F₁ using analytic hierchy process. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 40(2): 129-135. (in Chinese)
[38]	张亚琼, 张伟, 戴思兰, 季玉山, 何晶. 基于AHP的中国传统盆栽菊花产业化品种筛选. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(21): 4438-4446. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.21.012.
	ZHANG Y Q, ZHANG W, DAI S L, JI Y S, HE J. AHP-based screening of traditional potted Chrysanthemum for industrialized production. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(21): 4438-4446. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.21.012. (in Chinese)
[39]	沈瑶, 王晗璇, 侯海娴, 吴智明, 周厚高. 引进盆栽小菊品种观赏价值及园林应用的综合评价. 广西植物, 2021, 41(8): 1363-1371.
	SHEN Y, WANG H X, HOU H X, WU Z M, ZHOU H G. Comprehensive evaluation on ornamental value and landscape application of introduced potted chrysanthemum cultivars. Guihaia, 2021, 41(8): 1363-1371. (in Chinese)
[40]	蒲娅, 张佳莹, 黄河, 戴思兰. 基于层次分析法和灰色关联法的露地小菊早花品种筛选// 中国观赏园艺研究进展, 2018, 2018: 131-139.
	PU Y, ZHANG J Y, HUANG H, DAI S L. The selection of early flowering spray outdoor chrysanthemum by analytic hierarchy process and grey correlation analysis// Advances in Ornamental Horticulture of China, 2018: 131-139. (in Chinese)
[41]	TARDIEU F, CABRERA-BOSQUET L, PRIDMORE T, BENNETT M. Plant phenomics, from sensors to knowledge. Current Biology, 2017, 27(15): R770-R783.

性状类型 Trait type	观测性状指标名称 Observation trait index
花期性状 Florescence	现蕾期Squaring period，破膜期Breaking film period，透色期Color-transparent period，初花期Initial flowering，盛花期Full flowering，末花期Last flowering stage，孕蕾期Bud period，开花持续期Blooming period，盛花期单株着花数量Number of capitulum per plant at full-bloom stage，着花整齐度Flowering uniformity
花色性状 Flower color	比色卡测色Colorimetric card color measurement (RHSCC)，色差仪测色Color difference meter color measurement (CIELAB standard color space)
花型性状 Flower traits	舌状花形状Ligulate flower shape，舌状花数量Number of ligulate flowers，舌状花轮数Number of tongue-shaped wreaths，舌状花长度Ligulate flower length，舌状花宽度Tongue flower width，花序直径Capitulum diameter，花序高度Capitulum height，花心直径Flower center diameter，花托直径Torus diameter，花托高度Torus height
株型性状 Plant leaf type	株高Plant height，冠幅Crown breadth，分枝数Number of branching，圆整度Roundness，茎秆强度Stem strength
叶型性状 Leaf type	叶片宽度Blade width，叶片长度Blade length，叶柄长度Petiole length

品种/株系编号 Cultivars/lines number	色系（占比） Color group (%)	比色卡编号 RHSCC number	品种/株系编号 Cultivars/lines number	色系 Color group	比色卡编号 RHSCC number
F1-4	白色（4） White group (4)	N155C	C34	紫色（26） Purple group (26)	77B
F1-15	黄色（11） Yellow group (11)	12A	F1-30		77B
183Q-5		13B	F1-17		77C
F1-36		6B	B200		N78C
F1-41	橙黄色（7） Yellow orange Group (7)	17C	F1-24		N78C
F1-22	橙黄色（7） Yellow orange Group (7)	23C	F1-6		N78D
F1-14	橙色（7） Orange group (7)	173C	F1-7		N78D
F1-37	橙色（7） Orange group (7)	34B	F1-19	紫罗兰色（4） Violet group (4)	84C
F1-18	紫红色（33） Red purple group (33)	58A	F1-19	紫罗兰色（4） Violet group (4)	84C
F1-5		64A	F1-20	变色系（15） Color changing Group (15)	29D
F1-33		70B	F1-20		56A
S8		70B	F1-3		75C
F1-29		70C	F1-3		27D
F1-2		71A	F1-23		155B
F1-9		72A	F1-23		N78C
F1-16		72B	F1-35		13B
F1-25		72A	F1-35		35A

色系 Color group	CIELab颜色系统 Cielab color system			数量 Quantity	品种或株系编号 Variety or strain number
色系 Color group	明度Brilliance (L^*)	红度Redness (a^*)	黄度Yellowness (b^*)	数量 Quantity	品种或株系编号 Variety or strain number
白色系 White group	89.90—91.23	-4.30—-1.96	5.52—15.08	2	F1-23、F1-4
黄色系 Yellow group	59.25—88.38	-12.99—15.88	15.47—83.78	6	F1-36、183Q-5、F1-15、F1-41、F1-22、F1-14
粉色系 Pink group	50.42—82.93	4.35—39.67	-11.69—32.59	12	F1-3、F1-19、F1-20、F1-35、F1-17、F1-29、F1-6、B200、F1-7、F1-9、F1-30、F1-24
红色系 Red group	35.75—75.62	10.18—41.07	-9.69—36.76	9	F1-37、F1-33、S8、F1-16、C34、F1-18、F1-25、F1-2、F1-5

舌状花形态 Ligulate flower shape	株系数量 Quantity	株系分布 Line distribution
平瓣 Flat	17	F1-4、F1-15、183Q-5、F1-36、F1-22、F1-37、C34、B200、F1-6、S8、F1-29、F1-2、F1-5、F1-25、F1-23、F1-3、F1-7
匙瓣 Spoon	11	F1-41、F1-14、F1-30、F1-17、F1-24、F1-19、F1-9、F1-16、F1-18、F1-35、F1-20
管瓣 Tubular	1	F1-33
有龙骨 Keel-like	13	F1-15、183Q-5、F1-36、F1-41、F1-14、C34、F1-17、B200、F1-24、F1-19、F1-33、F1-16、F1-35
有缺刻 Incision	10	F1-15、F1-14、F1-37、F1-41、F1-24、F1-35、F1-165、F1-17、F1-30、F1-6

舌状花数量 Number of ligulate flowers	株系数量 Number of lines	株系分布 Line distribution	舌状花轮数 Number of ligulate flower wheels	株系数量 Number of lines	株系分布 Line distribution
25—50	8	F1-2、F1-3、F1-9、F1-14、F1-16、C34、F1-37、S8	2-3	7	F1-2、F1-3、F1-14、F1-9、F1-16、F1-17、F1-24、C34
50—100	9	F1-4、F1-17、F1-19、F1-24、F1-25、F1-30、F1-35、F1-36、183Q-5	4-5	8	F1-4、F1-19、F1-20、F1-25、F1-30、F1-35、183Q-5、S8
100—150	6	F1-6、F1-7、F1-15、F1-23、F1-29、F1-41	7	8	F1-7、F1-22、F1-29、F1-36、F1-37、F1-41、B200
150—200	4	F1-5、F1-20、F1-22、B200	8	4	F1-5、F1-6、F1-15、F1-18
>200	2	F1-18、F1-33	>9	2	F1-23、F1-33

早花露地小菊杂交后代株系的综合评价与筛选

Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Early Flowering Spray Outdoor Chrysanthemum

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

Z目标层 Target layer	C约束层 Constriant layer	权重 Weight (Z-Ci)	P标准层 Standard layer	权重 Weight
露地小菊观赏性状综合评价 Comprehensive evaluation of ornamental traits of small chrysanthemum in open field	C1花期 Florescence	0.5069	P1初花期起始时间 The starting time of the initial flowering period	0.1817
			P2开花持续时间Flowering duration	0.1301
			P3盛花期单株着花数量 Number of capitulum per plant at full-bloom stage	0.1383
			P4盛花期着花整齐度Flowering uniformity in full-bloom period	0.0568
	C2花色 Flower color	0.2260	P5花色适宜度Flower color suitability	0.0565
	C2花色 Flower color	0.2260	P6花色稳定性Flower color stability	0.1695
	C3花型 Flower type	0.1625	P7花序直径（花径）Capitulum diameter	0.0539
			P8花心直径Flower center diameter	0.0092
			P9舌状花形态（瓣型）Ligulate flower shape (petal type)	0.0128
			P10舌状花数量Number of ligulate flowers	0.0574
			P11舌状花轮数（重瓣性）Number of ligulate flower wheels (double valve)	0.0292
	C4株型 Plant type	0.0966	P12冠幅Crown breadth	0.0292
			P13株高Plant height	0.0103
			P14分枝数Number of branching	0.0103
			P15圆整度Roundness	0.0279
			P16茎秆强度（抗倒伏能力）Stem strength (lodging resistance)	0.0189
	C5叶型 Leaf type	0.0080	P17叶片长度Blade width	0.0040
	C5叶型 Leaf type	0.0080	P18叶片长宽比Blade aspect ratio	0.0040

等级 Grade	材料 Material	综合得分 Synthesis score	等级 Grade	材料 Material	综合得分 Synthesis score	等级 Grade	材料 Material	综合得分 Synthesis score
Ⅰ	C34	3.8941	Ⅱ	F1-29	3.1042	Ⅲ	F1-4	2.3647
Ⅰ	F1-18	3.891	Ⅱ	B200	3.1246	Ⅲ	F1-30	2.7404
Ⅰ	F1-36	3.8659	Ⅱ	F1-15	3.1621	Ⅲ	F1-3	2.7690
Ⅰ	F1-5	3.8346	Ⅱ	F1-2	3.2129	Ⅲ	F1-35	2.8305
Ⅰ	F1-6	3.8236	Ⅱ	F1-9	3.2521	Ⅲ	F1-20	2.8466
Ⅰ	183Q-5	3.7284	Ⅱ	F1-17	3.2673	Ⅲ	F1-24	2.8760
Ⅰ	F1-16	3.6446	Ⅱ	F1-41	3.3012	Ⅲ	F1-25	2.9700
Ⅰ	F1-22	3.6386	Ⅱ	F1-14	3.3495	Ⅲ	F1-7	3.0041
Ⅰ	S8	3.6047	Ⅱ	F1-19	3.3733
Ⅰ	F1-33	3.5359	Ⅱ	F1-23	3.3973
			Ⅱ	F1-37	3.4324

[1]	侯赵玉, 龚亦钊, 钱祎, 程卓雅, 陶俊, 赵大球. 芍药耐热性评价及其鉴定指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(23): 4742-4756.
[2]	米热扎提江·喀由木, 西尔艾力·吾麦尔江, 李晓曈, 王香茹, 贵会平, 张恒恒, 张西岭, 董强, 宋美珍. 棉花苗期耐低磷种质筛选及耐低磷综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(21): 4150-4162.
[3]	张一中, 张晓娟, 梁笃, 郭琦, 范昕琦, 聂萌恩, 王绘艳, 赵文博, 杜维俊, 柳青山. 基于表型性状的高粱育种材料遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(15): 2837-2853.
[4]	李欢, 鄢小青, 杨占烈, 谭金玉, 黎小冰, 陈能刚, 吴荣菊, 陈惠查, 阮仁超. 贵州香禾糯地方稻种资源表型遗传多样性分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(11): 2035-2046.
[5]	陈志敏, 陈晓林, 谭振华, 陈兆星, 谌丹丹, 马岩岩, 郑永强, 易时来, 吕强, 谢让金. 不同产区纽荷尔脐橙橘园果实综合品质评价与适宜区域筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(10): 1949-1965.
[6]	王洋洋,刘万代,贺利,任德超,段剑钊,胡新,郭天财,王永华,冯伟. 基于多元统计分析的小麦低温冻害评价及水分效应差异研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[7]	王秀秀,邢爱双,杨茹,何守朴,贾银华,潘兆娥,王立如,杜雄明,宋宪亮. 陆地棉种质资源表型性状综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[8]	卞能飞, 孙东雷, 巩佳莉, 王幸, 邢兴华, 金夏红, 王晓军. 花生烘烤食用品质评价及指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 641-652.
[9]	沈倩,张思平,刘瑞华,刘绍东,陈静,葛常伟,马慧娟,赵新华,杨国正,宋美珍,庞朝友. 棉花出苗期耐冷综合评价体系的构建及耐冷指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355.
[10]	胡馨, 张职亮, 张飞, 邓波, 房伟民. 大花型茶专用菊杂交后代株系的综合评价与筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051.
[11]	解斌,安秀红,陈艳辉,程存刚,康国栋,周江涛,赵德英,李壮,张艳珍,杨安. 不同苹果砧木对持续低磷的响应及适应性评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(13): 2598-2612.
[12]	徐晓,任根增,赵欣蕊,常金华,崔江慧. 中国高粱地方品种和育成品种穗部表型性状精准鉴定及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[13]	范文静,刘明,赵鹏,张强强,吴德祥,郭鹏宇,朱晓亚,靳容,张爱君,唐忠厚. 甘薯苗期耐低氮基因型筛选及不同氮效率类型综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(10): 1891-1902.
[14]	刘秋员,周磊,田晋钰,程爽,陶钰,邢志鹏,刘国栋,魏海燕,张洪程. 长江中下游地区常规中熟粳稻氮效率综合评价及高产氮高效品种筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1397-1409.
[15]	张彦,王劲松,董二伟,武爱莲,王媛,焦晓燕. 中晚熟区主要高粱品种耐瘠性综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23): 4954-4968.