长期秸秆配施化肥下土壤团聚体碳氮分布、微生物量与小麦产量的协同效应

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.08.007

中国农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (8): 1503-1514.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.08.007

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉·农业生态环境 • 上一篇下一篇

长期秸秆配施化肥下土壤团聚体碳氮分布、微生物量与小麦产量的协同效应

韩紫璇¹(), 房静静²(), 武雪萍¹(), 姜宇³(), 宋霄君¹, 刘晓彤¹

¹ 北方干旱半干旱耕地高效利用全国重点实验室(中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所，北京 100081)
² 首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院，北京 100048
³ 黑龙江省农业科学院/黑河分院国家土壤质量爱辉观测试验站，黑龙江黑河 164300

收稿日期:2022-03-24 接受日期:2022-04-19 出版日期:2023-04-16 发布日期:2023-04-23
联系方式: 韩紫璇，E-mail：18811799202@163.com。房静静，E-mail：837430785@qq.com。韩紫璇与房静静为同等贡献作者。
基金资助:
中国农业科学院科技创新工程(CAAS-ZDRW202202); 国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0200408); 国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0300804); 国家科技支撑计划(2015BAD22B03)

Synergistic Effects of Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Content in Water-Stable Aggregates as well as Microbial Biomass on Crop Yield Under Long-Term Straw Combined Chemical Fertilizers Application

HAN ZiXuan¹(), FANG JingJing²(), WU XuePing¹(), JIANG Yu³(), SONG XiaoJun¹, LIU XiaoTong¹

¹ State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China (the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
² College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048
³ Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Heihe Branch National Soil Quality Aihui Observation and Testing Station, Heihe 164300, Heilongjiang

Received:2022-03-24 Accepted:2022-04-19 Published:2023-04-16 Online:2023-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究秸秆配施化肥对暗棕壤团聚体组成、团聚体碳氮含量、土壤微生物量特征及小麦产量的影响，揭示长期秸秆配施化肥下土壤肥力和生产力的协同提升机制。【方法】依托长期定位40年施肥试验，选取4个处理：单施化肥（NP）、秸秆配施化肥（S+NP）、秸秆配施1/2化肥（S+1/2NP）、秸秆配施1/4化肥（S+1/4NP），其中秸秆为麦秸隔年还田，用量为3 000 kg·hm^-2，氮磷化肥用量为150 kg N·hm^-2、150 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2。采集0—20 cm土层土样，利用湿筛法得到不同粒级的水稳性团聚体，测定团聚体中有机碳（SOC）、氮含量及土壤微生物量碳（SMBC）、微生物量氮（SMBN）含量。【结果】（1）长期秸秆配施化肥显著降低土壤容重并提高了团聚体稳定性，和NP相比，S+NP处理土壤容重降低4.7%，>2 mm团聚体含量、平均重量直径（MWD）和几何重量直径（GWD）分别提升254.4%、76.5%和91.3%。（2）S+NP、S+1/2NP处理>2 mm团聚体百分含量、MWD和GWD显著高于S+1/4NP，分别增加了49.1%—52.4%，19.43%—22.4% 和24.2%—33.3%。（3）S+NP、S+1/2NP、S+1/4NP和NP相比增加了>2 mm和>0.25 mm团聚体对土壤有机碳、全氮贡献率，并显著提高全土SOC、SMBC和SMBN含量；其中，SOC含量在S+NP中最高，比S+1/2NP、S+1/4NP高6.3%和12.6%。（4）产量表现为S+NP>NP>S+1/2NP>S+1/4NP处理，S+NP比减施化肥处理提高小麦产量28.6%—47.5%。（5）土壤团聚体稳定性、SOC含量及小麦产量之间有较好的相关性，>2 mm和>0.25 mm团聚体含量、MWD和GWD分别与全土SOC含量及小麦产量呈显著或极显著正相关。【结论】暗棕壤地区在长期秸秆还田条件下，配施化肥量150 kg N·hm^-2、150 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2时能提高土壤团聚体稳定性、有机碳含量、微生物生物量和小麦产量，最大化实现土壤结构改良、肥力提升和作物增产的协同效应。

关键词: 秸秆还田, 化肥, 暗棕壤, 水稳性团聚体, 碳氮含量, 微生物生物量, 小麦产量

Abstract:

【Objective】The effects of long-term straw combined application of chemical fertilizers on the content of aggregates, distributions of aggregate-associated organic carbon and nitrogen, and soil microbial biomass were studied to reveal the promotion of soil fertility and productivity. 【Method】Soil samples were collected from a 40-year long-term experiment. The research was conducted with 4 treatments: pure chemical fertilizer (NP), straw with chemical fertilizer (S+NP), straw with 1/2 chemical fertilizer (S+1/2NP), and straw with 1/4 chemical fertilizer (S+1/4NP), and the straw was returned with the amount of 3 000 kg·hm^-2, chemical fertilizer NP was pure N 150 kg·hm^-2 and P₂O₅ 150 kg·hm^-2 conducted. All soils samples were separated into four aggregate-size classes (>2 mm, 0.25-2 mm, 0.053-0.25 mm, and <0.053 mm) by wet sieving. Organic carbon and total nitrogen content of aggregates and soil microbial biomass content were measured. 【Result】(1) Long-term application of chemical fertilizers with straw reduced soil bulk density, while improved the stability of aggregates. Compared with NP, the bulk density of S+NP decreased by 4.7%, while the proportion of aggregates >2 mm in size, the average weight diameter (MWD) and geometric weight diameter (GWD) increased by 254.4%, 76.5% and 91.3%, respectively. (2) In the three chemical fertilizers combined with straw return, the percentage of aggregates >2 mm, MWD and GWD under S+NP and S+1/2NP were significantly increased by 49.1%-52.4%, 19.43%-22.4% and 24.2%-33.3%, compared with S+1/4NP, respectively. (3) Compared with NP, S+NP, S+1/2NP and S+1/4NP increased the contribution rate of aggregates >2 mm and >0.25 mm to SOC and total nitrogen, and significantly improved the SOC, SMBC and SMBN content in bulk soil. Among them, the SOC content was the highest under S+NP, which was 6.3% and 12.6% higher than that under S+1/2NP and S+1/4NP, respectively. (4) The yield was showed that S+NP>NP>S+1/2NP>S+1/4NP, and S+NP increased wheat yield by 5.83%-83.6% compared with other treatments. (5) Positive correlation was revealed between soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen content and crop yield, and >2 mm aggregate content, while MWD and GWD were significantly or extremely significant with the total soil SOC, SMBC content and wheat yield, respectively.【Conclusion】In the dark brown soil area, the long-term straw returning and fertilizer application of 150 kg N·hm^-2 and 150 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2could improve aggregate stability, soil organic carbon content, microbial biomass and yield, and achieve the synergistic effect of soil structure improvement, fertility improvement and crop yield increase.

Key words: straw returned, chemical fertilizer, dark brown soil, water-stable aggregates, carbon and nitrogen content, microbial biomass, wheat yield

韩紫璇, 房静静, 武雪萍, 姜宇, 宋霄君, 刘晓彤. 长期秸秆配施化肥下土壤团聚体碳氮分布、微生物量与小麦产量的协同效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(8): 1503-1514.

HAN ZiXuan, FANG JingJing, WU XuePing, JIANG Yu, SONG XiaoJun, LIU XiaoTong. Synergistic Effects of Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Content in Water-Stable Aggregates as well as Microbial Biomass on Crop Yield Under Long-Term Straw Combined Chemical Fertilizers Application[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(8): 1503-1514.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.08.007

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2023/V56/I8/1503

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

图4

参考文献 45

[1]	郑凤君, 王雪, 李景, 王碧胜, 宋霄君, 张孟妮, 武雪萍, 刘爽, 席吉龙, 张建诚, 李永山. 免耕条件下施用有机肥对冬小麦土壤酶及活性有机碳的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(6): 1202-1213. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.06.012. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.06.012
	ZHENG F J, WANG X, LI J, WANG B S, SONG X J, ZHANG M N, WU X P, LIU S, XI J L, ZHANG J C, LI Y S. Effect of no-tillage with manure on soil enzyme activities and soil active organic carbon. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(6): 1202-1213. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.06.012. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.06.012
[2]	陈晓芬, 李忠佩, 刘明, 江春玉. 不同施肥处理对红壤水稻土团聚体有机碳、氮分布和微生物生物量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(5): 950-960. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.05.010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.05.010
	CHEN X F, LI Z P, LIU M, JIANG C Y. Effects of different fertilizations on organic carbon and nitrogen contents in water-stable aggregates and microbial biomass content in paddy soil of subtropical China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(5): 950-960. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.05.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.05.010
[3]	LI L D, WILSON C B, HE H B, ZHANG X D, ZHOU F, SCHAEFFER S M. Physical, biochemical, and microbial controls on amino sugar accumulation in soils under long-term cover cropping and no-tillage farming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 135: 369-378. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.017
[4]	ZHANG A F, CHENG G, HUSSAIN Q, ZHANG M, FENG H, DYCK M, SUN B H, ZHAO Y, CHEN H X, CHEN J, WANG X D. Contrasting effects of straw and straw-derived biochar application on net global warming potential in the Loess Plateau of China. Field Crops Research, 2017, 205: 45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.02.006
[5]	孙汉印, 姬强, 王勇, 王旭东. 不同秸秆还田模式下水稳性团聚体有机碳的分布及其氧化稳定性研究. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(2): 369-376.
	SUN H Y, JI Q, WANG Y, WANG X D. The distribution of water-stable aggregate-associated organic carbon and its oxidation stability under different straw returning modes. Journal of Agro- Environment Science, 2012, 31(2): 369-376. (in Chinese)
[6]	刘恩科, 赵秉强, 梅旭荣, HWAT Bing-So, 李秀英, 李娟. 不同施肥处理对土壤水稳定性团聚体及有机碳分布的影响. 生态学报, 2010, 30(4): 1035-1041.
	LIU E K, ZHAO B Q, MEI X R, BINGSO H, LI X Y, LI J. Distribution of water-stable aggregates and organic carbon of arable soils affected by different fertilizer application. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(4): 1035-1041. (in Chinese)
[7]	陈轩敬, 赵亚南, 柴冠群, 张珍珍, 张跃强, 石孝均. 长期不同施肥下紫色土综合肥力演变及作物产量响应. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(S1): 139-144.
	CHEN X J, ZHAO Y N, CHAI G Q, ZHANG Z Z, ZHANG Y Q, SHI X J. Integrated soil fertility and yield response to long-term different fertilization in purple soil. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(S1): 139-144. (in Chinese)
[8]	XU X, PANG D W, CHEN J, LUO Y L, ZHENG M J, YIN Y P, LI Y X, LI Y, WANG Z L. Straw return accompany with low nitrogen moderately promoted deep root. Field Crops Research, 2018, 221: 71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.009
[9]	葛选良, 钱春荣, 李梁, 姜宇博, 宫秀杰, 吕国依. 秸秆还田配合施肥措施对玉米产量及耕层土壤质量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(1): 131-136.
	GE X L, QIAN C R, LI L, JIANG Y B, GONG X J, LÜ G Y. Effects of straw returning cooperated with fertilizer practice on yield of maize and soil quality of tillage layer. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(1): 131-136. (in Chinese)
[10]	汪军, 王德建, 张刚, 王灿. 连续全量秸秆还田与氮肥用量对农田土壤养分的影响. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(5): 40-44, 62.
	WANG J, WANG D J, ZHANG G, WANG C. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer rate with continuous full amount of straw incorporated on paddy soil nutrients. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 24(5): 40-44, 62. (in Chinese)
[11]	胡诚, 曹志平, 叶钟年, 吴文良. 不同的土壤培肥措施对低肥力农田土壤微生物生物量碳的影响. 生态学报, 2006, 26(3): 808-814.
	HU C, CAO Z P, YE Z N, WU W L. Impact of soil fertility maintaining practice on soil microbial biomass carbon in low production agro-ecosystem in Northern China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(3): 808-814. (in Chinese)
[12]	LU F, WANG X K, HAN B, OUYANG Z Y, DUAN X N, ZHENG H, MIAO H. Soil carbon sequestrations by nitrogen fertilizer application, straw return and no-tillage in China’s cropland. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15(2): 281-305. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2009.15.issue-2
[13]	乔丹丹, 吴名宇, 张倩, 韩燕来, 张毅博, 李培培, 李慧. 秸秆还田与生物炭施用对黄褐土团聚体稳定性及有机碳积累的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(3): 92-99.
	QIAO D D, WU M Y, ZHANG Q, HAN Y L, ZHANG Y B, LI P P, LI H. Effect of boichar and straw with chemical fertilizers on soil aggregate distribution and organic carbon content in yellow cinnamon soil. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2018(3): 92-99. (in Chinese)
[14]	刘多森, 李伟波. 土壤容重和孔隙度的简易测定法. 土壤通报, 1983, 14(4): 44-47.
	LIU D S, LI W B. Simple determination method of soil bulk density and porosity. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1983, 14(4): 44-47. (in Chinese)
[15]	中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978.
	Nanjing Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Physical and Chemical Analysis of Soil. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1978. (in Chinese)
[16]	CAMBARDELLA C A, ELLIOTT E T. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics of soil organic matter fractions from cultivated grassland soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994, 58(1): 123-130. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800010017x
[17]	VANCE E D, BROOKES P C, JENKINSON D S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19(6): 703-707.
[18]	周虎, 吕贻忠, 杨志臣, 李保国. 保护性耕作对华北平原土壤团聚体特征的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(9): 1973-1979.
	ZHOU H, LÜ Y Z, YANG Z C, LI B G. Effects of conservation tillage on soil aggregates in Huabei plain, China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(9): 1973-1979. (in Chinese)
[19]	WANG X B, DAI K, ZHANG D C, ZHANG X M, WANG Y, ZHAO Q S, CAI D X, HOOGMOED W B, OENEMA O. Dryland maize yields and water use efficiency in response to tillage/crop stubble and nutrient management practices in China. Field Crops Research, 2011, 120(1): 47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.08.010
[20]	SINGH M, SARKAR B, BISWAS B, BOLAN N S, CHURCHMAN G J. Relationship between soil clay mineralogy and carbon protection capacity as influenced by temperature and moisture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 109: 95-106. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.02.003
[21]	AMÉZKETA E. Soil aggregate stability: a review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 1999, 14(2/3): 83-151. doi: 10.1300/J064v14n02_08
[22]	姜灿烂, 何园球, 刘晓利, 陈平帮, 王艳玲, 李辉信. 长期施用有机肥对旱地红壤团聚体结构与稳定性的影响. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(4): 715-722.
	JIANG C L, HE Y Q, LIU X L, CHEN P B, WANG Y L, LI H X. Effect of long-term application of organic manure on structure and stability of aggregate in upland red soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(4): 715-722. (in Chinese)
[23]	周孟椋, 高焕平, 刘世亮, 李慧, 刘芳, 姜桂英, 赵颖. 秸秆与氮肥配施对潮土微生物活性及团聚体分布的影响. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(1): 340-345.
	ZHOU M L, GAO H P, LIU S L, LI H, LIU F, JIANG G Y, ZHAO Y. Effects of combined application of straw and nitrogen fertilizer on microbial activity and aggregate distribution in fluvo aquic soil. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(1): 340-345. (in Chinese)
[24]	顾炽明, 郑险峰, 黄婷苗, 侯仰毅, 王朝辉. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对冬小麦产量及氮素调控的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(5): 48-53, 73.
	GU C M, ZHENG X F, HUANG T M, HOU Y Y, WANG Z H. Effects of straw returning combined with nitrogen fertilizer application on yield of winter wheat and nitrogen regulation. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(5): 48-53, 73. (in Chinese)
[25]	CZACHOR H, CHARYTANOWICZ M, GONET S, NIEWCZAS J, JOZEFACIUK G, LICHNER L. Impact of long‐term mineral and organic fertilizer application on the water stability, wettability and porosity of aggregates obtained from two loamy soils. European Journal of Soil science, 2015, 66(3): 577-588. doi: 10.1111/ejss.2015.66.issue-3
[26]	HUANG T, YANG H, HUANG C, JU X. Effects of nitrogen management and straw return on soil organic carbon sequestration and aggregate-associated carbon. European Journal of Soil Science, 2018, 69(5): 913-923. doi: 10.1111/ejss.2018.69.issue-5
[27]	PUGET P, CHENU C, BALESDENT J. Total and young organic matter distributions in aggregates of silty cultivated soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 1995, 46(3): 449-459. doi: 10.1111/ejs.1995.46.issue-3
[28]	JASTROW J D, MILLER R M, BOUTTON T W. Carbon dynamics of aggregate-associated organic matter estimated by carbon-13 natural abundance. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1996, 60(3): 801-807. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000030017x
[29]	KAN Z R, VIRK A L, HE C, LIU Q Y, QI J Y, DANG Y P, ZHAO X, ZHANG H L. Characteristics of carbon mineralization and accumulation under long-term conservation tillage. Catena, 2020, 193: 104636. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104636
[30]	BIMÜLLER C, KREYLING O, KÖLBL A, VON LÜTZOW M, KÖGEL-KNABNER I. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in hierarchically structured aggregates of different size. Soil and Tillage Research, 2016, 160: 23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.12.011
[31]	HENRIKSEN T M, BRELAND T A. Nitrogen availability effects on carbon mineralization, fungal and bacterial growth, and enzyme activities during decomposition of wheat straw in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1999, 31(8): 1121-1134. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00030-9
[32]	YANG J, GAO W, REN S R. Long-term effects of combined application of chemical nitrogen with organic materials on crop yields, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in fluvo-aquic soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 2015, 151: 67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.03.008
[33]	王碧胜, 于维水, 武雪萍, 高丽丽, 李景, 李生平, 宋霄君, 刘彩彩, 李倩, 梁国鹏, 蔡典雄, 张继宗. 添加玉米秸秆对旱作土壤团聚体及其有机碳含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(9): 1553-1563. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.09.007. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.09.007
	WANG B S, YU W S, WU X P, GAO L L, LI J, LI S P, SONG X J, LIU C C, LI Q, LIANG G P, CAI D X, ZHANG J Z. Effect of straw addition on the formation of aggregates and accumulation of organic carbon in dryland soil. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(9): 1553-1563. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.09.007. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.09.007
[34]	SINGH B, SINGH Y, LADHA J K, BRONSON K F, BALASUBRAMANIAN V, SINGH J, KHIND C S. Chlorophyll meter-and leaf color chart-based nitrogen management for rice and wheat in northwestern India. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94(4): 821-829. doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.8210
[35]	张婷, 孔云, 修伟明, 李刚, 赵建宁, 杨殿林, 张贵龙, 王丽丽. 施肥措施对华北潮土区小麦-玉米轮作体系土壤微生物群落特征的影响. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(6): 1159-1167. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2019.06.011
	ZHANG T, KONG Y, XIU W M, LI G, ZHAO J N, YANG D L, ZHANG G L, WANG L L. Effects of fertilization treatments on soil microbial community characteristics under the wheat-maize rotation system in fluvo-aquic soil region in North China. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(6): 1159-1167. (in Chinese)
[36]	肖新, 朱伟, 肖靓, 邓艳萍, 赵言文, 汪建飞. 适宜的水氮处理提高稻基农田土壤酶活性和土壤微生物量碳氮. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(21): 91-98.
	XIAO X, ZHU W, XIAO L, DENG Y P, ZHAO Y W, WANG J F. Suitable water and nitrogen treatment improves soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and enzyme activities of paddy field. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(21): 91-98. (in Chinese)
[37]	许仁良, 王建峰, 张国良, 戴其根. 秸秆、有机肥及氮肥配合使用对水稻土微生物和有机质含量的影响. 生态学报, 2010, 30(13): 3584-3590.
	XU R L, WANG J F, ZHANG G L, DAI Q G. Changes of microbe and organic matter content in paddy soil applied with straw, manure and nitrogen fertilizer. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(13): 3584-3590. (in Chinese)
[38]	王士超, 闫志浩, 王瑾瑜, 槐圣昌, 武红亮, 邢婷婷, 叶洪龄, 卢昌艾. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对稻田土壤活性碳氮动态变化的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(4): 782-794. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.010. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.010
	WANG S C, YAN Z H, WANG J Y, HUAI S C, WU H L, XING T T, YE H L, LU C A. Nitrogen fertilizer and its combination with straw affect soil labile carbon and nitrogen fractions in paddy fields. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(4): 782-794. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.04.010
[39]	TISDALL J M, OADES J M. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. Journal of Soil Science, 1982, 33(2): 141-163. doi: 10.1111/ejs.1982.33.issue-2
[40]	GAO L L, WANG B S, LI S P, WU H J, WU X P, LIANG G P, GONG D Z, ZHANG X M, CAI D X, DEGRÉ A. Soil wet aggregate distribution and pore size distribution under different tillage systems after 16 years in the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 2019, 173: 38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.09.043
[41]	ZHOU Z H, WANG C K, ZHENG M H, JIANG L F, LUO Y Q. Patterns and mechanisms of responses by soil microbial communities to nitrogen addition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 115: 433-441. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.015
[42]	YANG H S, FANG C, MENG Y, DAI Y J, LIU J. Long-term ditch-buried straw return increases functionality of soil microbial communities. Catena, 2021, 202: 105316. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105316
[43]	赵亚丽, 郭海斌, 薛志伟, 穆心愿, 李潮海. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对土壤微生物数量、酶活性及作物产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(6): 1785-1792.
	ZHAO Y L, GUO H B, XUE Z W, MU X Y, LI C H. Effects of tillage and straw returning on microorganism quantity, enzyme activities in soils and grain yield. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(6): 1785-1792. (in Chinese)
[44]	李玮, 乔玉强, 陈欢, 曹承富, 杜世州, 赵竹. 玉米秸秆还田配施氮肥对冬小麦土壤氮素表观盈亏及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3): 561-570.
	LI W, QIAO Y Q, CHEN H, CAO C F, DU S Z, ZHAO Z. Effects of combined maize straw and N application on soil nitrogen surplus amount and yield of winter wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(3): 561-570. (in Chinese)
[45]	李涛, 葛晓颖, 何春娥, 欧阳竹. 豆科秸秆、氮肥配施玉米秸秆还田对秸秆矿化和微生物功能多样性的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(12): 2377-2384.
	LI T, GE X Y, HE C E, OUYANG Z. Effects of straw retention with mixing maize straw by alfalfa straw or N fertilizer on carbon and nitrogen mineralization and microbial functional diversity. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2016, 35(12): 2377-2384. (in Chinese)

处理 Treatment	容重 Bulk density (g·cm^-3)	团聚体质量百分比 Proportion of soil aggregates (%)				MWD (mm)	GWD (mm)
处理 Treatment	容重 Bulk density (g·cm^-3)	>2 mm	0.25-2 mm	0.053-0.25 mm	<0.053 mm	MWD (mm)	GWD (mm)
NP	1.34 ± 0.09 a	9.21 ± 0.23 c	52.79 ± 2.49 a	25.06 ± 1.84 a	12.94 ± 0.78 a	1.96 ± 0.07 c	0.46 ± 0.01 c
S+NP	1.28 ± 0.11 c	32.63 ± 1.43 a	45.95 ± 1.35 c	12.53 ± 1.04 c	8.89 ± 0.39 c	3.46 ± 0.09 a	0.88 ± 0.02 a
S+1/2NP	1.30 ± 0.08 b	33.32 ± 1.49 a	41.77 ± 2.35 d	14.05 ± 0.94 bc	10.86 ± 0.78 b	3.38 ± 0.09 a	0.82 ± 0.03 a
S+1/4NP	1.31 ± 0.10 b	21.87 ± 1.58 b	49.75 ± 3.49 b	16.33 ± 1.01 b	12.06 ± 1.04 a	2.83 ± 0.06 b	0.66 ± 0.01 b

处理 Treatment	SMBC (mg·kg^-1)	SMBN (mg·kg^-1)	SMBC/SMBN	SMBC/SOC (%)	小麦产量 Grain yield (t·hm^-2)
NP	178.21 ± 1.10 c	36.27 ± 0.71 c	4.91 ± 0.13 b	1.02 ± 0.13 c	2.87 ± 0.17 b
S+NP	365.34 ± 0.51 b	42.21 ± 0.34 b	8.66 ± 0.11 a	1.74 ± 0.12 b	2.97 ± 0.21 a
S+1/2NP	400.86 ± 0.92 b	46.41 ± 0.73 a	8.64 ± 0.16 a	2.04 ± 0.22 ab	2.12 ± 0.16 c
S+1/4NP	463.74 ± 1.21 a	46.54 ± 0.36 a	9.96 ± 0.18 a	2.46 ± 0.43 a	1.56 ± 0.09 d

长期秸秆配施化肥下土壤团聚体碳氮分布、微生物量与小麦产量的协同效应

Synergistic Effects of Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Content in Water-Stable Aggregates as well as Microbial Biomass on Crop Yield Under Long-Term Straw Combined Chemical Fertilizers Application

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 45

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	韩潇杰, 任志杰, 李双静, 田培培, 卢素豪, 马耕, 王丽芳, 马冬云, 赵亚南, 王晨阳. 不同施氮量对土壤团聚体碳氮含量及小麦产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(9): 1766-1778.
[2]	高尚洁, 刘杏认, 李迎春, 柳晓婉. 施用生物炭和秸秆还田对农田温室气体排放及增温潜势的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 935-949.
[3]	马荣辉, 杨武杰, 于蕾, 杨泽龙, 王健, 郭跃升. 山东省作物秸秆和畜禽粪尿有机肥资源现状及替代化肥潜力分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(4): 721-739.
[4]	孙昭安, 张译文, 江丽华, 李昭君, 郭鑫, 曹慧, 孟凡乔. 番茄嫁接和施氮对氮肥去向和氮平衡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(4): 755-764.
[5]	王月梅, 田海梅, 王西娜, 郝雯悦, 吕喆铭, 于金铭, 谭军利, 王朝辉. 引黄灌区连续减施化肥对春小麦产量稳定性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(3): 539-554.
[6]	高慧珊, 李根明, 张进财, 姬广兴, 李青松. 河南省畜禽粪便同效当量替代化肥供需平衡分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(23): 4746-4760.
[7]	张毅, 刘颖, 程存刚, 李燕青, 李壮. 牛粪与化肥配施比例对苹果园土壤有机碳库和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(20): 4107-4118.
[8]	孙悦, 任科宇, 邹洪琴, 高洪军, 张水清, 李德近, 李冰洁, 廖楚芊, 段英华, 徐明岗. 黑土与潮土铁氧化物结合态有机碳对长期秸秆还田的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(19): 3823-3834.
[9]	杨立达, 彭新月, 朱文雪, 赵静, 袁晓婷, 林萍, 罗凯, 李易玲, 罗春明, 李雨泽, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 秸秆还田与灌溉方式对大豆玉米带状间作出苗及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(17): 3366-3383.
[10]	刘雅杰, 张天娇, 张向前, 路战远, 刘战勇, 程玉臣, 武迪, 李金龙. 秸秆还田下耕作方式对黑土活性有机碳组分及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(17): 3408-3423.
[11]	张小琴, 尹昌, 李政, 唐旭, 李艳, 吴春艳. 长期施肥对水稻土典型氨氧化菌和全程氨氧化菌种群活性和丰度的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(14): 2803-2814.
[12]	冀建华, 吕真真, 刘淑珍, 侯红乾, 刘益仁, 刘秀梅, 李絮花, 蓝贤瑾. 长期施用化肥对南方稻田土壤酸化和盐基离子损失的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(13): 2599-2611.
[13]	杨文辉, 罗灏程, 董二伟, 王劲松, 王媛, 刘秋霞, 黄晓磊, 焦晓燕. 长期不同施肥和深翻对玉米高粱轮作体系作物钾利用及土壤钾形态的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(12): 2390-2403.
[14]	柴如山, 朱丽青, 刘梦阳, 罗来超, 张亮亮, 程启鹏, 张朝春. 山东省小麦玉米秸秆资源分布与还田减肥潜力[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(11): 2202-2214.
[15]	舒小伟, 王树深, 伏桐, 王子涵, 丁周宇, 杨英, 赵士茹, 周娟, 黄建晔, 姚友礼, 王余龙, 董桂春. 小麦秸秆还田后不同水稻品种对简化穗肥施用的响应及其成因[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(10): 1961-1978.