中国农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (19): 4070-4083.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.19.004
王金凤1(),王壮壮1(),谷丰序1,牟海萌1,王宇1,段剑钊1,冯伟1,2,王永华1,2(),郭天财1,2()
收稿日期:
2020-11-25
接受日期:
2021-02-07
出版日期:
2021-10-01
发布日期:
2021-10-12
通讯作者:
王永华,郭天财
作者简介:
王金凤,E-mail: 基金资助:
WANG JinFeng1(),WANG ZhuangZhuang1(),GU FengXu1,MOU HaiMeng1,WANG Yu1,DUAN JianZhao1,FENG Wei1,2,WANG YongHua1,2(),GUO TianCai1,2()
Received:
2020-11-25
Accepted:
2021-02-07
Online:
2021-10-01
Published:
2021-10-12
Contact:
YongHua WANG,TianCai GUO
摘要:
【目的】研究品种、施氮量、种植密度及其交互作用对豫东南黏壤潮土区冬小麦碳氮代谢及籽粒产量的影响,明确该区冬小麦适宜的氮密调控处理组合,以期为该地区冬小麦高产高效栽培提供技术支撑。【方法】于2018—2020年连续2个冬小麦生长季,在豫东南黏壤潮土区设置品种(分蘖力中等、成穗率较高品种,鑫华麦818;分蘖力强、成穗率中等品种,百农207)、施氮量(N0,0;N240,240 kg·hm-2;N360,360 kg·hm-2)和种植密度(M1,225 万株/hm2;M2,375万株/hm2;M3,525万株/hm2)三因素裂裂区试验,重点分析三因子处理下冬小麦碳代谢(可溶性糖含量;磷酸蔗糖合成酶SPS活性;蔗糖合成酶SS活性)、氮代谢(可溶性蛋白质含量;硝酸还原酶NR活性;谷氨酰胺合成酶GS活性)生理参数及产量的差异。【结果】品种、氮肥、密度及其交互作用显著影响冬小麦的碳氮代谢,氮肥是影响2个品种产量及其构成因素的主控调节因子。施氮量、种植密度对碳氮代谢的影响因生育时期、品种而异。总体来看,氮密调控对2个品种碳代谢的调控优势主要在灌浆后期,对氮代谢的调控优势主要在灌浆中期,灌浆中后期M2N240处理的碳氮代谢指标参数值较最小处理组合平均增幅达358.28%。碳氮代谢平衡对不同分蘖成穗特性冬小麦品种产量形成的影响较大,尤其是生育后期,这可能是鑫华麦818整体产量高于百农207的主要生理原因。两年度试验均以M2N240处理下的产量较高,较产量最低的M1N0处理提高96.49%。【结论】综合考虑品种、氮肥、密度及其交互作用对冬小麦碳氮代谢平衡及产量的影响,施氮量和种植密度对2个冬小麦品种碳氮代谢的调控优势主要在灌浆中后期,M2N240处理可作为豫东南黏壤潮土区适宜的氮密调控组合。
王金凤,王壮壮,谷丰序,牟海萌,王宇,段剑钊,冯伟,王永华,郭天财. 氮密调控对两个冬小麦品种碳氮代谢及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19): 4070-4083.
WANG JinFeng,WANG ZhuangZhuang,GU FengXu,MOU HaiMeng,WANG Yu,DUAN JianZhao,FENG Wei,WANG YongHua,GUO TianCai. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Plant Density on Carbon Metabolism, Nitrogen Metabolism and Grain Yield of Two Winter Wheat Varieties[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4070-4083.
表1
播前土壤基础养分"
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 土层 Soil layers (cm) | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N (g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkaline N (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P (mg·kg-1) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 鑫华麦818 Xinhua 818 | 0-20 | 17.82 | 1.27 | 102.97 | 263.67 | 4.17 | 8.19 |
20-40 | 9.44 | 0.86 | 78.64 | 192.44 | 2.99 | 8.31 | ||
百农207 Bainong 207 | 0-20 | 16.54 | 1.21 | 102.47 | 299.47 | 3.90 | 8.12 | |
20-40 | 13.98 | 1.13 | 88.04 | 246.16 | 3.34 | 8.21 | ||
2019-2020 | 鑫华麦818 Xinhua 818 | 0-20 | 17.60 | 1.17 | 94.38 | 157.92 | 6.49 | 8.16 |
20-40 | 7.97 | 0.75 | 74.39 | 112.95 | 3.50 | 8.24 | ||
百农207 Bainong 207 | 0-20 | 17.78 | 1.16 | 96.52 | 211.90 | 6.13 | 8.07 | |
20-40 | 8.54 | 0.89 | 76.96 | 156.68 | 3.77 | 8.16 |
表2
品种、密度和氮肥对冬小麦碳代谢、氮代谢及产量构成因素的方差分析"
指标 Item | 时期 Time | 2018―2019 | 2019―2020 | 年份 Year | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 V | 密度 D | 氮肥 N | 品种× 密度 V×D | 品种× 氮肥 V×N | 密度× 氮肥 D× N | 品种×密 度×氮肥 V×D× N | 品种 V | 密度 D | 氮肥 N | 品种× 密度 V×D | 品种× 氮肥 V×N | 密度× 氮肥 D× N | 品种×密 度×氮肥 V×D× N | |||
可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content | -X | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS |
0 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | |
10 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | |
20 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
30 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
SPS 酶活性 SPS activity | -X | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
0 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
10 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
20 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
30 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
SS 酶活性 SS activity | -X | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
0 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
10 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
20 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
30 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
可溶性蛋白质含量 Soluble protein content | -X | *** | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | ** |
0 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
10 | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | NS | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | *** | *** | |
20 | *** | *** | *** | * | *** | ** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | |
30 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
NR 酶活性 NR activity | -X | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS |
0 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | |
10 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
20 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | *** | *** | ** | |
30 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
GS 酶活性 GS activity | -X | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
0 | ** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
10 | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | * | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | *** | *** | *** | |
20 | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | *** | |
30 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | * | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | |
穗数 Spike number | *** | *** | *** | NS | NS | NS | NS | *** | *** | *** | NS | ** | *** | NS | *** | |
穗粒数 Grain per spike | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | * | *** | * | *** | |
千粒重 1000-grain weight | *** | NS | *** | * | *** | * | NS | *** | *** | *** | *** | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
产量Yield | *** | * | *** | NS | *** | ** | NS | *** | NS | *** | NS | *** | *** | NS | *** |
表3
氮肥与密度对两冬小麦品种产量及其构成因素的调控效应"
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 2018―2019 | 2019―2020 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗数 Spike number (104·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grain per spike | 千粒重 1000 grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 穗数 Spike number (104·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grain per spike | 千粒重 1000 grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | ||
A | M1N0 | 555.84c | 36.44bc | 51.37ab | 8293.81c | 370.29e | 32.01d | 51.70a | 4504.86d |
M1N240 | 632.50ab | 41.22a | 48.76de | 8726.52abc | 548.36abc | 36.74b | 51.06ab | 8439.39bc | |
M1N360 | 596.67bc | 39.71a | 47.99e | 8864.79ab | 515.69d | 35.42c | 50.21ab | 9283.47a | |
M2N0 | 613.06ab | 29.19e | 51.23ab | 8457.85bc | 514.19d | 14.52h | 49.89ab | 4581.60d | |
M2N240 | 633.61ab | 39.55a | 49.11cde | 9074.18a | 561.19ab | 42.90a | 48.97abc | 9109.38ab | |
M2N360 | 620.84ab | 34.24cd | 49.90bcd | 8725.23abc | 540.19bcd | 29.04e | 48.46bc | 7986.07c | |
M3N0 | 626.67ab | 32.58d | 51.54a | 8482.79bc | 532.03cd | 19.03g | 48.49bc | 5077.76d | |
M3N240 | 657.50a | 36.54b | 50.65abc | 8859.89ab | 573.25a | 29.26e | 46.34cd | 8666.20abc | |
M3N360 | 657.50a | 34.89bc | 49.39cde | 8463.66bc | 552.36abc | 27.17f | 44.90d | 7944.19c | |
B | M1N0 | 502.22c | 40.41c | 47.60a | 6717.02e | 306.27d | 41.90ab | 49.11a | 2626.90d |
M1N240 | 541.95abc | 43.80b | 44.22b | 8109.46c | 526.28ab | 42.70ab | 46.02bc | 7934.59b | |
M1N360 | 517.50bc | 40.14c | 41.51c | 8226.00abc | 513.78b | 42.70ab | 41.94e | 9195.11a | |
M2N0 | 510.00bc | 34.36d | 48.35a | 7177.87d | 440.02c | 18.70c | 46.96ab | 2826.41d | |
M2N240 | 585.28a | 46.57a | 41.33c | 8603.76a | 538.78ab | 45.80a | 44.89bcd | 9095.41a | |
M2N360 | 539.17abc | 46.41a | 41.94c | 8322.05abc | 521.28ab | 42.50ab | 43.06de | 7661.80bc | |
M3N0 | 526.67bc | 30.48e | 47.72a | 7410.25d | 517.53ab | 22.40c | 46.85ab | 3412.01d | |
M3N240 | 588.61a | 42.06bc | 42.61c | 8513.11ab | 550.03a | 39.30ab | 45.95bc | 8632.98ab | |
M3N360 | 561.67ab | 39.72c | 41.13c | 8147.44bc | 546.28ab | 38.30b | 43.86cde | 6904.84c |
表4
碳代谢、氮代谢与产量构成因素的相关性分析"
指标 Item | 品种Variety | 时期Time | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content | SPS酶活性 SPS activity | SS酶活性 SS activity | 可溶性蛋白质含量 Soluble protein content | NR酶活性 NR activity | GS酶活性 GS activity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗数 Spike number | A | -X | -0.34* | 0.31* | 0.45** | 0.46** | 0.26 | 0.48** |
0 | 0.57** | 0.51** | 0.48** | 0.59** | 0.40** | 0.67** | ||
10 | 0.76** | 0.75** | 0.77** | 0.70** | -0.15 | 0.60** | ||
20 | -0.01 | 0.58** | 0.56** | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.60** | ||
30 | 0.73** | 0.74** | 0.75** | 0.79** | -0.03 | 0.40** | ||
B | -X | -0.24 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.83** | 0.40** | 0.73** | |
0 | -0.60** | -0.21 | 0.01 | 0.68** | 0.45** | 0.69** | ||
10 | -0.47** | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.73** | 0.10 | 0.67** | ||
20 | -0.58** | 0.08 | -0.02 | 0.76** | 0.21 | 0.47** | ||
30 | 0.31* | 0.43** | 0.45** | 0.59** | 0.11 | 0.30* | ||
穗粒数 Grain per spike | A | -X | -0.09 | 0.36** | 0.36** | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.22 |
0 | 0.07 | 0.27* | 0.35* | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.42** | ||
10 | 0.15 | 0.39** | 0.40** | 0.33* | -0.08 | 0.28* | ||
20 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.01 | -0.05 | 0.36** | ||
30 | 0.50** | 0.41** | 0.42** | 0.45** | -0.24 | -0.01 | ||
B | -X | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.05 | -0.03 | 0.05 | |
0 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.14 | -0.04 | 0.02 | ||
10 | -0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.21 | -0.09 | 0.04 | ||
20 | -0.14 | 0.00 | -0.02 | -0.03 | -0.24 | -0.01 | ||
30 | -0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.22 | -0.26 | 0.10 | ||
千粒重 1000 grain weight | A | -X | 0.04 | 0.39** | 0.40** | -0.19 | -0.22 | -0.14 |
0 | -0.10 | 0.30* | 0.35** | -0.31* | -0.25 | 0.05 | ||
10 | -0.36** | 0.04 | 0.10 | -0.16 | -0.30* | 0.09 | ||
20 | -0.27* | -0.26 | -0.25 | -0.36** | -0.21 | 0.00 | ||
30 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.07 | -0.48** | -0.12 | ||
B | -X | 0.62** | 0.30* | 0.18 | -0.56** | -0.32* | -0.46** | |
0 | 0.70** | 0.54** | 0.30* | -0.59** | -0.28* | -0.44** | ||
10 | 0.85** | 0.34* | 0.16 | -0.63** | -0.33* | -0.47** | ||
20 | 0.68** | 0.31* | 0.39** | -0.60** | -0.19 | -0.48** | ||
30 | -0.40** | -0.44** | -0.44** | -0.56** | -0.14 | -0.22 |
表5
碳代谢、氮代谢与产量的相关性分析"
品种 Variety | 时期 Time | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content | SPS酶活性 SPS activity | SS酶活性 SS activity | 可溶性蛋白质含量 Soluble protein content | NR酶活性 NR activity | GS酶活性 GS activity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | -X | -0.68** | -0.04 | 0.14 | 0.78** | 0.60** | 0.46** |
0 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.63** | 0.72** | 0.71** | |
10 | 0.50** | 0.49** | 0.50** | 0.69** | 0.28* | 0.63** | |
20 | 0.35** | 0.56** | 0.49** | 0.45** | 0.45** | 0.69** | |
30 | 0.54** | 0.53** | 0.55** | 0.62** | 0.33* | 0.30* | |
B | -X | -0.55** | -0.03 | 0.05 | 0.78** | 0.50** | 0.68** |
0 | -0.67** | -0.35* | -0.10 | 0.68** | 0.59** | 0.63** | |
10 | -0.51** | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.59** | 0.36** | 0.60** | |
20 | -0.59** | 0.02 | -0.07 | 0.74** | 0.40** | 0.57** | |
30 | 0.41** | 0.44** | 0.44** | 0.53** | 0.36** | 0.29* |
[1] | 宋建民, 田纪春, 赵世杰. 小麦光合碳、氮代谢平衡调节酶研究进展. 麦类作物, 1997, 17(6):52-55. |
SONG J M, TIAN J C, ZHAO S J. Research progress of carbon and nitrogen metabolism balance regulating enzymes in wheat photosynthesis. Tritical Crops, 1997, 17(6):52-55. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 谢祝捷, 姜东, 戴廷波, 曹卫星. 植物的糖信号及其对碳氮代谢基因的调控. 植物生理学通讯, 2002, 38(4):399-405. |
XIE Z J, JIANG D, DAI Y B, CAO W X. Sugar signal and its regulation on C/N metabolism gene in plant. Plant Physiology Journal, 2002, 38(4):399-405. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 胡承霖, 姚孝友. 不同穗型小麦品种生长发育特性和产量形成的研究. 安徽农业科学, 1991(3):207-213. |
HU C L, YAO X Y. Study on the growth and development characteristics and yield formation of different panicle wheat varieties. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 1991(3):207-213. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 朱云集, 郭天财, 王晨阳, 崔金梅, 夏国军, 刘万代, 王永华. 两种穗型冬小麦品种产量形成特点及超高产关键栽培技术研究. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(6):82-86. |
ZHU Y J, GUO T C, WANG C Y, CUI J M, XIA G J, LIU W D, WANG Y H. Study on yield formation of winter wheat cultivars with different spike types and their key cultivation techniques for super- high yield. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2006, 26(6):82-86. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 张迪, 韩晓增. 长期不同植被覆盖和施肥管理对黑土活性有机碳的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(13):2715-2723. |
ZHANG D, HAN X Z. Changes of black soil labile organic carbon pool under different vegetation and fertilization managements. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(13):2715-2723. (in Chinese) | |
[6] | 徐明岗, 于荣, 王伯仁. 长期不同施肥下红壤活性有机质与碳库管理指数变化. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(5):723-729. |
XU M G, YU R, WANG B R. Changes of active organic matter and carbon pool management index in red soil under long-term different fertilization. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(5):723-729. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 李青军, 张炎, 胡伟, 孟凤轩, 冯广平, 胡国智, 刘新兰. 氮素运筹对玉米干物质积累,氮素吸收分配及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(3):755-760. |
LI Q J, ZHANG Y, HU W, MENG F X, FENG G P, HU G Z, LIU X L. Effects of nitrogen management on maize dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake and distribution and maize yield. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2011, 17(3):755-760. (in Chinese) | |
[8] | 吕丽华, 陶洪斌, 夏来坤, 张雅杰, 赵明, 赵久然, 王璞. 不同种植密度下的夏玉米冠层结构及光合特性. 作物学报, 2008, 34(3):447-455. |
LÜ L H, TAO H B, XIA L K, ZHANG Y J, ZHAO M, ZHAO J R, WANG P. Canopy structure and photosynthesis traits of summer maize under different planting densities. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(3):447-455. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 王贺正, 徐国伟, 吴金芝, 张均, 陈明灿, 付国占, 李友军. 不同氮素水平对豫麦49-198籽粒灌浆及淀粉合成相关酶活性的调控效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2):288-296. |
WANG H Z, XU G W, WU J Z, ZHANG J, CHEN M C, FU G Z, LI Y J. Regulating effect of nitrogen fertilization on grain filling and activities of enzymes involved in starch synthesis of Yumai 49-198. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(2):288-296. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 孟维伟, 王东, 于振文. 施氮量对小麦氮代谢相关酶活性和子粒蛋白质品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(1):10-17. |
MENG W W, WANG D, YU Z W. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on activities of nitrogen metabolism related enzymes and grain protein quality of wheat. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(1):10-17. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 王贺正, 张均, 吴金芝, 徐国伟, 陈明灿, 付国占, 李友军. 不同氮素水平对小麦旗叶生理特性和产量的影响. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4):69-75. |
WANG H Z, ZHANG J, WU J Z, XU G W, CHEN M C, FU G Z, LI Y J. Effects of different nitrogen levels on physiological characteristics and yield of flag leaves in wheat. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(4):69-75. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 张伟, 李鲁华, 吕新. 不同施氮量对滴灌春小麦根系时空分布、氮素利用率及产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2016, 25(2):195-202. |
ZHANG W, LI L H, LÜ X. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on spatiotemporal distribution of root system, nitrogen use efficiency and yield of spring wheat with drip irrigation. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2016, 25(2):195-202. (in Chinese) | |
[13] | 刘璐, 王朝辉, 刁超朋, 王森, 李莎莎. 旱地不同小麦品种产量与干物质及氮磷钾养分需求的关系. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(3):599-608. |
LIU L, WANG Z H, DIAO C P, WANG S, LI S S. Grain yields of diferent wheat cultivars and their relations to dry matter and NPK requirements in dryland. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(3):599-608. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 葛君, 姜晓君. 施氮量对小麦旗叶光合特性、SPAD值、籽粒产量及碳氮代谢的影响. 天津农业科学, 2019, 25(3):1-4. |
GE J, JIANG X J. Effects of nitrogen application on photosynthetic characteristics, spad value, grain yield and carbon and nitrogen metabolism of flag leaves in wheat. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 25(3):1-4. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 马登科, 殷俐娜, 刘溢健, 杨文稼, 邓西平, 王仕稳. 施氮量对黄土高原旱地冬小麦产量和水分利用效率影响的整合分析. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(3):486-499. |
MA D K, YIN L N, LIU Y J, YANG W J, DENG X P, WANG S W. A meta-analysis of the effects of nitrogen application rates on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in dryland of loess plateau. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(3):486-499. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | YANG D Q, CAI T, LUO Y L, WANG Z L. Optimizing plant density and nitrogen application to manipulate tiller growth and increase grain yield and nitrogen-use efficiency in winter wheat. PeerJ, 2019, 7:6484-6509. |
[17] |
POSTMA J A, HECHT V L, HIKOSAKA K, NORD E A, PONS T L, POORTER H. Dividing the pie: A quantitative review on plant density responses. Plant Cell and Environment, 2020, 44(4):1072-1094.
doi: 10.1111/pce.v44.4 |
[18] | 马冬云, 郭天财, 查菲娜, 王晨阳, 朱云集, 王永华. 种植密度对两种穗型冬小麦旗叶氮代谢酶活性及籽粒蛋白质含量的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(3):514-517. |
MA D Y, GUO T C, CHA F N, WANG C Y, ZHU Y J, WANG Y H. Effects of planting density on activities of nitrogen metabolism enzymes in flag leaves and grain protein content in winter wheat with two spike types. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(3):514-517. (in Chinese) | |
[19] |
GAO Y J, LI Y, ZHANG J C, LIU W G, DANG Z P, CAO W X, QIANG Q. Effects of mulch, N fertilizer, and plant density on wheat yield, wheat nitrogen uptake, and residual soil nitrate in a dryland area of China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2009, 85(2):109-121.
doi: 10.1007/s10705-009-9252-0 |
[20] |
LI D X, ZHANG D, WANG H G, LI H R, FANG Q, LI H Y, LI R Q. Planting density maintains high wheat yield under limiting irrigation in North China Plain. International Journal of Plant Production, 2019, 14(9):107-117.
doi: 10.1007/s42106-019-00071-7 |
[21] | 李宁, 翟志席, 李建民, 段留生, 李召虎. 播种期和密度对不同穗型小麦品种荧光动力学参数及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(12):199-204. |
LI N, ZHAI Z X, LI J M, DUAN L S, LI Z H. Effect of sowing date and planting density on fluorescence induction kinetic parameters and yield in different spike type cultivars. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2009, 24(12):199-204. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 骆兰平, 于振文, 王东, 张永丽, 石玉. 土壤水分和种植密度对小麦旗叶光合性能和干物质积累与分配的影响. 作物学报, 2011, 37(6):1049-1059. |
LUO L P, YU Z W, WANG D, ZHANG Y L, SHI Y. Effects of planting density and soil moisture on flag leaf photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter accumulation and distribution in wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(6):1049-1059. (in Chinese) | |
[23] |
FISCHER R A, RAMOS O H M, MONASTERIO I O, SAYRE K D. Yield response to plant density, row spacing and raised beds in low latitude spring wheat with ample soil resources: An update. Field Crops Research, 2019, 232:95-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.011 |
[24] |
DOEHLERT D C, KUO T M, FELKER F C. Enzymes of sucrose and hexose metabolism in developing kernels of two inbreds of maize. Plant Physiology, 1988, 86(4):1013-1019.
doi: 10.1104/pp.86.4.1013 |
[25] | 王小纯, 熊淑萍, 马新明, 张娟娟, 王志强. 不同形态氮素对专用型小麦花后氮代谢关键酶活性及籽粒蛋白质含量的影响. 生态学报, 2005, 25(4):802-807. |
WANG X C, XIONG S P, MA X M, ZHANG J J, WANG Z Q. Effects of different nitrogen forms on key enzyme activity involved in nitrogen metabolism and grain protein content in speciality wheat cultivars. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(4):802-807. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | 武丽, 张西仲, 唐兴贵, 罗倩茜, 李余湘, 左业华, 叶文玲. 钼胁迫对烟草含钼酶和碳氮代谢关键酶的影响. 核农学报, 2015, 29(12):2385-2393. |
WU L, ZHANG X Z, TANG X G, LUO Q X, LI Y X, ZUO Y H, YE W L. Effect of molybdenum stress on molybdenum-containing enzymes and key enzymes of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in tobacco. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(12):2385-2393. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | XIONG F S, GAO Y Z, ZHAN Y C, LI G F. Relationship between leaf sucrose and starch content and their degradative enzymes activities in crop plants. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1994, 20(1):52-58. |
[28] |
CHAMPIGNY M L. Integration of photosynthetic carbon and nitrogen metabolism in higher plants. Photosynthesis Research, 1995, 46(1-2):117-127.
doi: 10.1007/BF00020422 |
[29] |
李永庚, 蒋高明, 杨景成. 温度对小麦碳氮代谢、产量及品质影响. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(2):164-169.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2003.0025 |
LI Y G, JIANG G M, YANG J C. Effects of temperature on carbon and nitrogen metabolism, yield and quality of wheat. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2003, 27(2):164-169. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2003.0025 |
|
[30] | 李永庚, 于振文, 姜东, 余松烈. 冬小麦旗叶蔗糖和籽粒淀粉合成动态及与其有关的酶活性的研究. 作物学报, 2001, 27(5):658-664. |
LI Y G, YU Z W, JIANG D, YU S L. Studies on the dynamic changes of the synthesis of sucrose in the flag leaf and starch in the grain and related enzymes of high-yielding wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001, 27(5):658-664. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 李双, 司转运, 申孝军, 高阳, 段爱旺. 水氮供应对灌浆期冬小麦籽粒淀粉合成相关酶活性及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2018, 38(4):460-468. |
LI S, SI Z Y, SHEN X J, GAO Y, DUAN A W. Effect of different water and nitrogen levels on starch synthesis enzyme activity in wheat grains during grain filling stage and wheat yield. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2018, 38(4):460-468. (in Chinese) | |
[32] | 王东, 于振文, 李延奇, 史桂萍. 施氮量对济麦20旗叶光合特性和蔗糖合成及籽粒产量的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(6):903-908. |
WANG D, YU Z W, LI Y Q, SHI G P. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rate on photosynthetic character, sucrose synthesis in flag leaves and grain yield of strong gluten wheat Jimai 20. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(6):903-908. (in Chinese) | |
[33] | 许大全. 光合作用及有关过程对长期高CO2浓度的响应. 植物生理学通讯, 1994, 30(2):81-87. |
XU D Q. Response of photosynthesis and related processes to long-term high CO2 concentration. Plant Physiology Communications, 1994, 30(2):81-87. (in Chinese) | |
[34] | 张元帅, 冯伟, 张海艳, 齐双丽, 衡亚蓉, 郭彬彬, 李晓, 王永华, 郭天财. 遮阴和施氮对冬小麦旗叶光合特性及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(9):1177-1184. |
ZHANG Y S, FENG W, ZHANG H Y, QI S L, HENG Y R, GUO B B, LI X, WANG Y H, GUO T C. Effects of shading and nitrogen rate on photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaves and yield of winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(9):1177-1184. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | 杜少勇, 熊淑萍, 赵鹏, 马新明, 张英武, 蔺世召, 张心玲, 刘红君. 豫北高地力条件下施氮量对冬小麦花后氮代谢特征及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2011, 31(5):882-886. |
DU S Y, XIONG S P, ZHAO P, MA X M, ZHANG Y W, LIN S Z, ZHANG X L, LIU H J. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on characteristic of nitrogen metabolism and yield after anthesis of wheat in the high fertility soil of north henan. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2011, 31(5):882-886. (in Chinese) | |
[36] | 姜丽娜, 刘佩, 齐冰玉, 徐光武, 张利霞, 马建辉, 李春喜. 不同施氮量及种植密度对小麦开花期氮素积累转运的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(2):131-141. |
JIANG L N, LIU P, QI B Y, XU G W, ZHANG L X, MA J H, LI C X. Effects of different nitrogen application amounts and seedling densities on nitrogen accumulation and transport in winter wheat at anthesis stage. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(2):131-141. (in Chinese) | |
[37] | 蒿宝珍, 姜丽娜, 方保停, 张英华, 张菡, 李春喜, 王志敏. 限水灌溉冬小麦冠层氮分布与转运特征及其对供氮的响应. 生态学报, 2011, 31(17):4941-4951. |
HAO B Z, JIANG L N, FANG B T, ZHANG Y H, ZHANG H, LI C X, WANG Z M. Effect of different nitrogen supply on the temporal and spatial distribution and remobilization of canopy nitrogen in winter wheat under limited irrigation condition. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(17):4941-4951. (in Chinese) | |
[38] | 沈学善, 李金才, 屈会娟, 魏凤珍, 王成雨. 种植密度对晚播冬小麦氮素同化积累分配及利用效率的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2009, 14(4):41-46. |
SHEN X S, LI J C, QU H J, WEI F Z, WANG C Y. Effects of planting density on assimilation, accumulation, distribution and use efficiency of nitrogen in late sowing winter wheat. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2009, 14(4):41-46. (in Chinese) | |
[39] | LIU Y, LIAO Y C, LIU W Z. High nitrogen application rate and planting density reduce wheat grain yield by reducing filling rate of inferior grain in middle spikelets. The Crop Journal, 2021,(2):412-426. |
[40] | 李世清, 邵明安, 李紫燕, 伍维模, 张兴昌. 小麦籽粒灌浆特征及影响因素的研究进展. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(11):2031-2039. |
LI S Q, SHAO M A, LI Z Y, WU W M, ZHANG X C. Review of characteristics of wheat grain fill and factors to influence it. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2003, 23(11):2031-2039. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 张晓丽, 陶伟, 高国庆, 陈雷, 郭辉, 张华, 唐茂艳, 梁天锋. 直播栽培对双季早稻生育期、抗倒伏能力及产量效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 249-263. |
[2] | 严艳鸽, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 赵秉强, 袁亮. 葡聚糖改性尿素对冬小麦产量和肥料氮去向的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 287-299. |
[3] | 徐久凯, 袁亮, 温延臣, 张水勤, 李燕婷, 李海燕, 赵秉强. 畜禽有机肥氮在冬小麦季对化肥氮的相对替代当量[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(2): 300-313. |
[4] | 王彩香,袁文敏,刘娟娟,谢晓宇,马麒,巨吉生,陈炟,王宁,冯克云,宿俊吉. 西北内陆早熟陆地棉品种的综合评价及育种演化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 1-16. |
[5] | 赵政鑫,王晓云,田雅洁,王锐,彭青,蔡焕杰. 未来气候条件下秸秆还田和氮肥种类对夏玉米产量及土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 104-117. |
[6] | 张玮,严玲玲,傅志强,徐莹,郭慧娟,周梦瑶,龙攀. 播期对湖南省双季稻产量和光热资源利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 31-45. |
[7] | 熊伟仡,徐开未,刘明鹏,肖华,裴丽珍,彭丹丹,陈远学. 不同氮用量对四川春玉米光合特性、氮利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1735-1748. |
[8] | 李易玲,彭西红,陈平,杜青,任俊波,杨雪丽,雷鹿,雍太文,杨文钰. 减量施氮对套作玉米大豆叶片持绿、光合特性和系统产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762. |
[9] | 王浩琳,马悦,李永华,李超,赵明琴,苑爱静,邱炜红,何刚,石美,王朝辉. 基于小麦产量与籽粒锰含量的磷肥优化管理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(9): 1800-1810. |
[10] | 桂润飞,王在满,潘圣刚,张明华,唐湘如,莫钊文. 香稻分蘖期减氮侧深施液体肥对产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1529-1545. |
[11] | 廖萍,孟轶,翁文安,黄山,曾勇军,张洪程. 杂交稻对产量和氮素利用率影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1546-1556. |
[12] | 李前,秦裕波,尹彩侠,孔丽丽,王蒙,侯云鹏,孙博,赵胤凯,徐晨,刘志全. 滴灌施肥模式对玉米产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616. |
[13] | 王洋洋,刘万代,贺利,任德超,段剑钊,胡新,郭天财,王永华,冯伟. 基于多元统计分析的小麦低温冻害评价及水分效应差异研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318. |
[14] | 秦羽青,程宏波,柴雨葳,马建涛,李瑞,李亚伟,常磊,柴守玺. 中国北方地区小麦覆盖栽培增产效应的荟萃(Meta)分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109. |
[15] | 谭先明,张佳伟,王仲林,谌俊旭,杨峰,杨文钰. 基于PLS的不同水氮条件下带状套作玉米产量预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1127-1138. |
|