中国农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (17): 3479-3495.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.17.006

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

淹水弱光复合胁迫对夏玉米根形态结构、生理特性和产量的影响

王群(),赵向阳,刘东尧,闫振华,李鸿萍,董朋飞,李潮海   

  1. 河南农业大学农学院/省部共建小麦玉米作物学国家重点实验室,郑州 450046
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-16 接受日期:2020-06-09 出版日期:2020-09-01 发布日期:2020-09-11
  • 作者简介:王群,E-mail:wangqun177@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    现代农业产业技术体系专项资金(CARS-02-17);国家重点研发计划“粮食丰产增效科技创新”重点专项(2017YFD0300300);国家公益性行业(农业科研专项201503117)

Root Morphological, Physiological Traits and Yield of Maize Under Waterlogging and Low Light Stress

WANG Qun(),ZHAO XiangYang,LIU DongYao,YAN ZhenHua,LI HongPing,DONG PengFei,LI Chaohai   

  1. College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University/National Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, Zhengzhou 450046
  • Received:2020-03-16 Accepted:2020-06-09 Online:2020-09-01 Published:2020-09-11

摘要:

【目的】随着全球气候变化,玉米生长季气象灾害频发,阴雨寡照已成为黄淮南部地区玉米的主要非生物灾害之一。本研究通过比较2个敏感性不同玉米品种在花期淹水弱光复合胁迫的根系生长动态、结构特征和生理特性,以期探明玉米根系对花期阴雨寡照胁迫的响应特征。【方法】以郑单958和豫玉22为材料,设对照(CK)、淹水(W)、弱光(S)、淹水+弱光(WS)4个不同胁迫处理,采用盆栽试验比较不同胁迫处理下玉米根干重、长度、根表面积、根体积、节根层数的动态变化特征,探明根形态结构、根生理指标及产量对淹水、弱光及复合胁迫的响应特征。【结果】淹水、弱光及其复合胁迫下玉米根总干重、根总长度、根表面积和根体积均显著下降,3种逆境以淹水弱光复合胁迫降幅最大,其次是淹水、弱光单一胁迫,W、S、WS处理的单株根干重和根长度平均比CK降低15.21%、5.08%、21.07%和14.86%、5.52%、18.14%,根表面积和根体积则比CK平均降低9.83%、4.62%、12.72%和12.62%、6.61%、16.23%;WS处理的根干重、根长度、根表面积和根体积比W处理平均降低6.64%、3.84%、3.21%和4.12%,比S处理平均降低16.55%、13.10%、8.41%和10.32%,且WS与S处理间差异显著,与W处理之间差异不显著。淹水及复合胁迫下根通气组织发达,根气腔数量、面积、孔积率和节根层数明显增加,其中W、WS处理根单位面积上气腔数量比CK平均增加5.29和10.03倍,气腔面积较CK平均增加5.76和13.27倍,根孔积率较CK平均增加8.01和10.00倍,W和WS处理节根层数平均比CK增加1—2层,但S处理与CK无差异。淹水、弱光及复合胁迫使玉米根系生理指标和产量显著降低,尤其以复合胁迫下降幅度最大,各指标处理间变化趋势为WS

关键词: 夏玉米, 淹水弱光复合胁迫, 根结构, 根活力, 根吸收和活跃吸收面积, 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】With the global climate change, meteorological disasters occur frequently during the maize growth season. In order to explore characteristics of root response to rainy and low light stress, this study was carried out to investigate root morphology, physiological traits and yield of maize under waterlogging and low light combined stress at flowering stage.【Method】Taking two different maize varieties (Zhengdan958 and Yuyu22) as research objects, the experiment, including four treatments with contrast (CK), waterlogging (W), low light (S), and waterlogging and low light (WS) was conducted to compare dynamic changes of root dry weight, root length, root surface area, root volume, nodal root layer and to analyze the morphological, anatomical and physiological characteristics and yield under different stress.【Result】The root dry weight, root length, root surface area and root volume of maize were significantly decreased under combined stress, and these indicators were the largest reductions under waterlogging and low light stress, the second reductions under waterlogging stress and the smallest reductions under low light stress. Compared to CK, root dry weight were decreased by 15.21%, 5.08%, 21.07% , and root length were decreased by 14.86%, 5.52%, 18.14% in average under waterlogging stress, low light stress and combined stress, respectively. Root superficial area and root volume were decreased by 9.83%, 4.62%, 12.72% and 12.62%, 6.61%, 16.23% under three different stress (W, S, and WS). Compared to W and S stress, root dry weight, root length, root surface area and root volume were decreased by 6.64%, 3.84%, 3.21%, 4.12% and 16.55%, 13.10%, 8.41%, 10.32% under WS stress, and it was significantly different between WS and S. But there was no obviously different between WS and W. Root aerenchyma numbers, root aerenchyma areas, root porosity and crown root layers were increased significantly under waterlogging stress as well as waterlogging and low light combined stress. Compared with the contrast, root aerenchyma numbers were increased significantly by 5.29 and 10.03 times with W and WS treatment in average, respectively. Then aerenchyma areas and root porosities were increased by 5.76, 13.27 times and 8.01, 10.00 times under W and WS treatment, respectively. Crown root layers had more 1 to 2 layers under W and WS than that under CK, however, there was not different obviously between S and CK. Root physiological traits and yield of maize were decreasing significantly under waterlogging and low light stress. Especially there was the largest decreasing under combined stress. Compared with CK, root activities, total root absorbing area, root active absorbing area and ratio of active root absorption of maize were decreased significantly by 52.82%, 28.48%, 36.72% and 20.00% in average under combined stress, respectively. The change order of treatments was WS

Key words: summer maize, waterlogging and low light stress, root morphology and anatomy, root activities, root absorbing and active absorbing areas, yield