营养导向型农业的概念、发展与启示

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.18.001

中国农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (18): 3083-3088.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.18.001

营养导向型农业的概念、发展与启示

卢士军¹,黄家章¹,吴鸣²,沈东婧³,孙君茂¹()

^1. 农业农村部食物与营养发展研究所,北京 100081
^2. 中国科学院文献情报中心,北京 100190
^3. 中国科学院上海生命科学信息中心,上海 200031

收稿日期:2018-11-20 接受日期:2019-07-08 出版日期:2019-09-16 发布日期:2019-09-23
通讯作者: 孙君茂
作者简介:卢士军,E-mail： lushijun01@caas.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFE0113100);中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目(CAAS-ASTIP-2016-IFND)

The Concept and Development of Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture and Its Enlightenments to China

LU ShiJun¹,HUANG JiaZhang¹,WU Ming²,SHEN DongJing³,SUN JunMao¹()

^1. Institute of Food and Nutrition Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081
^2. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
^3. Shanghai Information Center for Life Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031

Received:2018-11-20 Accepted:2019-07-08 Online:2019-09-16 Published:2019-09-23
Contact: JunMao SUN

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决全球面临的诸多营养与农业问题,探求营养、健康与农业发展之间的关系,自2013年以来,营养导向型农业的概念体系逐步发展完善,其政策措施也为全球推进营养导向型农业战略起到了重要的示范和引领作用。2013年前后为概念产生阶段,2014—2018年为概念发展阶段。营养导向型农业主要包括以食物供给为导向和以食物系统为导向两条主线。2017年FAO提出,营养导向型农业是一种以可持续的方式来满足居民膳食需求的新型农业范式或方案,旨在确保生产量足质优且价格合理、营养丰富、文化适宜、安全的各种食物,营养和健康是营养导向型农业的最终目标和衡量标准。为了实现这个目标,必须关注整个食物系统。同时在中国发展营养导向型农业需要考虑中国农业发展面临的诸多问题,包括农业发展的主要矛盾已由过去的总量不足转变为结构性矛盾;农产品品质家底不清,缺少农产品营养品质基准数据,缺乏完善的农产品质量法规体系等。营养导向型农业给新时代中国农业发展带来的启示：一是应以食物营养为导向,提高农产品营养质量,满足消费者对食物营养和健康的新需要;二是应以营养品质作为标尺,建立国家农产品营养成分基准数据库,完善相关法律及新时代食物与营养发展纲要的修改和制定。

关键词: 营养导向型农业, 概念, 发展, 全产业链

Abstract:

In order to solve the many nutritional problems facing the world and explore the relationship between nutrition, health and agricultural development, since 2013, the concept system of NSA has gradually developed and improved, and its policy measures have played an important role in promoting the NSA strategy globally. The concept generation stage was around 2013, and the concept development stage was from 2014 to 2018.The definition and target of NSA were mainly food supply oriented and food system oriented. In 2017, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) put forward that NSA was an approach that sought to ensure the production of a variety of affordable, nutritious, culturally appropriate and safe foods in adequate quantity and quality to meet the dietary requirements of populations in a sustainable manner. NSA used nutrition and health issues as its ultimate goal orientation and measurement. In order to achieve this goal, attention had to be paid to the entire food system. At the same time, the development of NSA in China had to consider many problems facing China's agricultural development. First, the main contradiction of China's agricultural development has changed from the quantity insufficient in the past to structural deficiency. Second, the benchmark data of nutritional quality of agricultural products was not clear, and the laws and regulations in agricultural product quality were of lack. Reconstructing the agricultural industry chain and food nutrition value chain with nutrition orientation could bring out enlightenments to solve many problems facing agricultural development in China: First, we should take food nutrition as the orientation and increase the supply of medium and high-end agricultural products to meet the new needs of consumers. Second, the nutritional quality should be taken as test standard of high quality, the national benchmark database of nutritional composition of agricultural products should be established, and relevant laws and the revision and formulation of the new food and nutrition development program should be improved.

Key words: nutrition-sensitive agriculture, concept, development, the whole industry chain

卢士军,黄家章,吴鸣,沈东婧,孙君茂. 营养导向型农业的概念、发展与启示[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(18): 3083-3088.

LU ShiJun,HUANG JiaZhang,WU Ming,SHEN DongJing,SUN JunMao. The Concept and Development of Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture and Its Enlightenments to China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(18): 3083-3088.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.18.001

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2019/V52/I18/3083

图/表 1

参考文献 25

[1]	CEDERHOLM T, BOSAEUS I, BARAZZONI R, BAUER J, VAN GOSSUM A, KLEK S, MUSCARITOLI M, NYULASI I, OCKENGA J, SCHNEIDER S M, DE VAN DER SCHUEREN M A E, SINGER P. Diagnostic criteria for malnutrition - An ESPEN consensus statement. Clinical Nutrition, 2015,34(3):335-340.
[2]	石汉平, 许红霞, 林宁, 江华, 李苏宜, 李增宁, 丛明华, 周莉, 胡雯, 赵长海, 刘英华, 朱翠凤, 方玉, 郑璇, 葛声, 施咏梅, 施万英 . 营养不良再认识. 肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志, 2015,2(4):1-5.
	SHI H P, XU H X, LIN N, JIANG H, LI S Y, LI Z L, CONG M H, ZHUO L, ZHAO C H, LIU Y H, ZHU C F, FANG Y, ZHENG X, GE S, SHI Y M, SHI W Y . Recognition of malnutrition. Electronic Journal of Metabolism and Nutrition of Cancer, 2015,2(4):1-5. (in Chinese)
[3]	WHO. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, 2009.
[4]	WORLD BANK. Improving nutrition through multisectoral approaches. Agriculture and Rural Development Brief.Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16953 .
[5]	FAO. Compendium of indicators for nutrition-sensitive agriculture. Rome: FAO, 2016. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6275e.pdf .
[6]	HERFORTH A, DUFOUR C . Key recommendations for improving nutrition through agriculture: establishing a global consensus// UNSCN (United Nations Standing Committee on Nutrition). Changing Food Systems for Better Nutrition. Rome: SCN News 2014,40:33-38.
[7]	RUEL M T, ALDERMAN H . Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet, 2013,382(9891):536-551.
[8]	BALZ A G, HEIL E A, JORDAN I . Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: new term or new concept? Agriculture & Food Security, 2015,4(1):6.
[9]	KEDING G B, SCHNEIDER K, JORDAN I . Production and processing of foods as core aspects of nutrition-sensitive agriculture and sustainable diets. Food Security, 2013,5(6):825-846.
[10]	RAHMAN K M M, ISLAM M A . Nutrition-sensitive agriculture in Bangladesh: a review. Food Security, 2014,6(5):671-683.
[11]	FAO. Second International Conference on Nutrition 19-21 November 2014: Nutrition-sensitive agriculture[R]. Rome: FAO, 2014.
[12]	FAO and WHO. Second international conference on nutrition. In: Conference outcome document: Rome declaration on nutrition. Rome: FAO and WHO, 2014. .
[13]	FAO and WHO. Second international conference on nutrition. In: Conference outcome document: framework for action. Rome: FAO and WHO, 2014. http://www.fao.org/3/a-mm215e.pdf .
[14]	JAENICKE H, VIRCHOW D. Entry points into a nutrition-sensitive agriculture. Food Security, 2013, 5(5): 679-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0293-5.
[15]	AG2NUT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE . Key recommendations for improving nutrition through agriculture and food systems.[ 2017-11- 02]. . Key recommendations for improving nutrition through agriculture and food systems. [2017-11-02]. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4922e.pdf .
[16]	DURY S, ALPHA A, BICHARD A . What risks do agricultural interventions entail for nutrition? : working paper - umr moisa [2017- 11-12]. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/umrwpaper/201403.htm .
[17]	BMEL. Understanding global food security and nutrition - Facts and backgrounds.[2017-10-22]. .
[18]	HERFORTH A, BALLARD T J . Nutrition indicators in agriculture projects: Current measurement, priorities, and gaps. Global Food Security, 2016,10:1-10.
[19]	BERTI P R, DESROCHERS R E, VAN H P, VĂN A L, NGO T D, HOANG K, THI N L. The process of developing a nutrition-sensitive agriculture intervention: a multi-site experience. Food Security, 2016,8(6):1-16.
[20]	FAO. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture and food systems in practice. Rome: FAO, 2017. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6983e.pdf .
[21]	WESANA J, DE STEUR H, DORA M K, MUTENYO E, MUYAMA L, GELLYNCK X . Towards nutrition sensitive agriculture. Actor readiness to reduce food and nutrient losses or wastes along the dairy value chain in Uganda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 182: 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.021
[22]	郭爱民 . 20世纪中期以来中国粮食生产、消费与产业分工关系解读: 基于Agr与Nagr表达式的分析—兼与日美韩相比较. 中国乡村研究, 2018(1):254-278.
	GUO A M . Interpretation of the relationship between food production, consumption and industrial division of labor in China since the mid-20th century: analysis based on the expressions of Agr and Nagr -and compared with Japan, the United States and South Korea. Rural China: An International Journal of History and Social Science, 2018(1):254-278. (in Chinese)
[23]	中国常驻联合国粮农机构代表处. 第二届国际营养大会在罗马召开. 世界农业, 2015(1):190.
	Permanent Representative of the People's Republic of China to UN Agencies for Food and Agriculture. The second international conference on nutrition was held in Rome. World Agriculture, 2015(1):190. (in Chinese)
[24]	中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于印发国民营养计划(2017-2030年)的通知.[ 2017-11-08]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-07/13/content_5210134.htm .
	General Office of the State Council of The People's Republic of China. A notice from the general office of the state council on the issuance of the national nutrition plan (2017-2030).[2017-11-08]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-07/13/content_5210134.htm. (in Chinese)
[25]	张春义, 王磊, 孙卉 . 中国生物强化(Harvestplus-China)项目概况. 中国科技成果, 2011(20):62-63.
	ZHANG C Y, WANG L, SUN H . Overview of Harvestplus-China project. China Science and Technology Achievements, 2011(20):62-63. (in Chinese)

营养导向型农业的概念、发展与启示

The Concept and Development of Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture and Its Enlightenments to China

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	贾冠清, 刁现民. 中国谷子种业创新现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 653-665.
[2]	张洪程,胡雅杰,戴其根,邢志鹏,魏海燕,孙成明,高辉,胡群. 中国大田作物栽培学前沿与创新方向探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(22): 4373-4382.
[3]	米国华,霍跃文,曾爱军,李刚华,王秀,张福锁. 作物养分管理的农机农艺结合技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(21): 4211-4224.
[4]	张洪程,胡雅杰,杨建昌,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,魏海燕,高辉,郭保卫,邢志鹏,胡群. 中国特色水稻栽培学发展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1301-1321.
[5]	李顺国, 刘斐, 刘猛, 程汝宏, 夏恩君, 刁现民. 中国谷子产业和种业发展现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3): 459-470.
[6]	李顺国,刘猛,刘斐,邹剑秋,陆晓春,刁现民. 中国高粱产业和种业发展现状与未来展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3): 471-482.
[7]	岳慧丽,张昭,张蕙杰,刘升平,张杰. 中国农业科技水平的时空演变、区域关联及其经济协同发展效应——以省域公立农业科研机构为例[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(24): 5251-5265.
[8]	周颖,梅旭荣,杨鹏,刘静. 绿色发展背景下农业生态补偿理论内涵与定价机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(20): 4358-4369.
[9]	刘静,李超,柳金雄,何蕊,孙燕荣. 高等级生物安全实验室在生物安全领域的作用及其发展的思考[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(1): 74-80.
[10]	周琳,杨祯妮,张敏,程广燕. 肉类全产业链损耗及可食用系参数研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(21): 3934-3942.
[11]	孙君茂,卢士军,江晓波,吴鸣,黄家章. 营养导向型农业国内外政策规划与启示[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(18): 3089-3096.
[12]	黄泽颖,孙君茂,郭燕枝,王秀丽,马云倩. 农民的农业生产多样性对其饮食多样化和营养健康的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(18): 3108-3121.
[13]	卢士军,刘晓洁,薛莉,唐振闯,刘刚,程广燕. 我国水稻全产业链损耗和浪费量的估算及对应策略[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(18): 3134-3144.
[14]	张伟明,陈温福,孟军,金梁,郭伟,赵洪亮. 东北地区秸秆生物炭利用潜力、产业模式及发展战略研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(14): 2406-2424.
[15]	胡志全，朱殿霄，辛岭，侯丽薇，王东阳. 基于产业要素年代差距分析的农业现代化水平国际比较研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(7): 1412-1420.