Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2014, Vol. 13 Issue (7): 1565-1574    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60811-X
Special Issue: Systematic Synthesis of Impacts of Climate Change on China’s Crop Production System Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Climate Change Impact and Its Contribution Share to Paddy Rice Production in Jiangxi, China
 LI Wen-juan, TANG Hua-jun, QIN Zhi-hao, YOU Fei, WANG Xiu-fen, CHEN Chang-li, JI Jian-hua , LIU Xiu-mei
1、Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
2、Key Laboratory of Agri-Informatics, Ministry of Agriculture/Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
3、International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, P.R.China
4、Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
5、Institute of Soil Fertilizer and Resource Environment, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 330200, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  In the study, an improved approach was proposed to identify the contribution shares of three group factors that are climate, technology and input, social economic factors by which the grain production is shaped. In order to calibrate the method, Jiangxi Province, one of the main paddy rice producers in China was taken as an example. Based on 50 years (1961-2010) meteorological and statistic data, using GIS and statistical analysis tools, the three group factors that in certain extent impact China’s paddy rice production have been analyzed quantitatively. The individual and interactive contribution shares of each factor group have been identified via eta square (η2). In the paper, two group ordinary leasr square (OLS) models, paddy models and climate models, have been constructed for further analysis. Each model group consists of seven models, one full model and six partial models. The results of paddy models show that climate factors individually and interactively contribute 11.42-15.25% explanatory power to the variation of paddy rice production in the studied province. Technology and input factors contribute 16.17% individually and another 8.46% interactively together with climate factors, totally contributing about 25%. Social economic factors contribute about 7% of which 4.65% is individual contribution and 2.49% is interactive contribution together with climate factors. The three factor groups individually contribute about 23% and interactively contribute additional 41% to paddy rice production. In addition every two of the three factor groups also function interactively and contribute about 22%. Among the three factor groups, technology and input are the most important factors to paddy rice production. The results of climate models support the results of paddy models, and display that solar radiation (indicated by sunshine hour variable) is the dominate climate factor for paddy rice production.

Abstract  In the study, an improved approach was proposed to identify the contribution shares of three group factors that are climate, technology and input, social economic factors by which the grain production is shaped. In order to calibrate the method, Jiangxi Province, one of the main paddy rice producers in China was taken as an example. Based on 50 years (1961-2010) meteorological and statistic data, using GIS and statistical analysis tools, the three group factors that in certain extent impact China’s paddy rice production have been analyzed quantitatively. The individual and interactive contribution shares of each factor group have been identified via eta square (η2). In the paper, two group ordinary leasr square (OLS) models, paddy models and climate models, have been constructed for further analysis. Each model group consists of seven models, one full model and six partial models. The results of paddy models show that climate factors individually and interactively contribute 11.42-15.25% explanatory power to the variation of paddy rice production in the studied province. Technology and input factors contribute 16.17% individually and another 8.46% interactively together with climate factors, totally contributing about 25%. Social economic factors contribute about 7% of which 4.65% is individual contribution and 2.49% is interactive contribution together with climate factors. The three factor groups individually contribute about 23% and interactively contribute additional 41% to paddy rice production. In addition every two of the three factor groups also function interactively and contribute about 22%. Among the three factor groups, technology and input are the most important factors to paddy rice production. The results of climate models support the results of paddy models, and display that solar radiation (indicated by sunshine hour variable) is the dominate climate factor for paddy rice production.
Keywords:  climate change       food security       paddy rice production       contribution share       China  
Received: 11 September 2013   Accepted:
Fund: 

The study is financed by the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB951502).

Corresponding Authors:  LI Wen-juan, Tel: +86-10-82108774, Fax: +86-10-82106225, E-mail: liwenjuan@caas.cn     E-mail:  liwenjuan@caas.cn
About author:  LI Wen-juan, Tel: +86-10-82108774, Fax: +86-10-82106225, E-mail: liwenjuan@caas.cn

Cite this article: 

LI Wen-juan, TANG Hua-jun, QIN Zhi-hao, YOU Fei, WANG Xiu-fen, CHEN Chang-li, JI Jian-hua , LIU Xiu-mei. 2014. Climate Change Impact and Its Contribution Share to Paddy Rice Production in Jiangxi, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(7): 1565-1574.

Chen C Q, Lei C X, Deng A X, Qian C R, Hoogmoed W , Zhang W J. 2011. Will higher minimum temperatures increase corn production in Northeast China? An analysis of historical data over 1965-2008 Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151, 1580-1588

 Chen C, Baethgen W E, Robertson A. 2012. Contributions of individual variation in temperature, solar radiation and precipitation to crop yield in the North China Plain, 1961- 2003. Climatic Change, 116, 767-788

 FAO. 2011. Statistic database. [2011-10-10] http://faostat.fao. org/site/339/default.aspx Li W J, Holm E, Lindgren U. 2009. Attractive vicinities. Population, Space and Place, 15, 1-18.

Li W J. 2007. Firms and People in Place, Driving Forces for Regional Growth. Umeå University Press, Sweden.

Lin E D, Wu S H, Dai X S, Lin E D, Wu S H, Dai X S, Liu H B, Liu C Z, Gao Q X, Li C X, Bao M Z. 2007. Updated understanding of climate change impacts. Advances in Climate Change Research, 3, 125-131

 Liu X F, Zhang Z, Shuai J B, Wang P, Shi W J, Tao F L, Chen Y. 2013. Impact of chilling injury and global warming on rice yield in Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Geographic Science, 23, 85-97

 Lobell D B, Asner G P. 2003. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in U.S. agricultural yields. Science, 299, 1032.

Lobell D B, Burke M B, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea M D, Falcon W P, Naylor R L. 2008. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319, 607-610

 Statistic Bureau of Jiangxi. 1982-2010. Jiangxi Statistic Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)

Schlenker W, Lobell D B. 2010. Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 5, 014010.

Schmidhuber J, Tubiello F N. 2007. Global food security under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 19703- 19708.

Shuai J B, Zhang Z, Liu X F, Chen Y, Wang P, Shi P J. 2013. Increasing concentrations of aerosols offset the benefits of climate warming on rice yields during 1980-2008 in Jiangsu Province, China Regional Environment Change, 13, 287-297.

Tao F, Yokozawa M, Liu J. 2008. Climate-crop yield relationships at provincial scales in China and the impacts of recent climate trends. Climate Research, 38, 83-94

 Wang J, Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Huang J, Rozelle S and Zhang L. 2009. The impact of climate change on China’s agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 40, 323-337

 Xie Y, Liu J D. 1997. Impacts of climate on grain output per unit area in China during the years of 1942-1992 Journal of Natural Resources, 12, 317-322.

Xiong W, Holman I, Lin E D, Conway D, Li Y, Wu W B. 2012. Untangling relative contributions of recent climate and CO2 trends to national cereal production in China. Environmental Research Letters, 7, 044014.

Yang X G, Liu Z J, Chen F. 2010. The possible effects of global warming on cropping systems in China I - The possible effects of climate warming on northern limits of cropping systems and crop yields in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 43, 329-336 (in Chinese)

Yang X G, Liu Z J, Chen F. 2011. The possible effects of global warming on cropping systems in China VI-Possible effects of future climate change on northern limits of cropping system in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44, 1562- 1570. (in Chinese)

Yu Q Y, Wu W B, Verburg P H, Vliet J, Yang P, Zhou Q B, Tang H J. 2013. A survey-based exploration of land-system dynamics in an agricultural region of Northeast China, Agricultural Systems, 121, 106-116

 Zhang J P, Zhao Y X, Wang C Y, He H. 2005. Effects of climate change on the growth and yield of double-harvest rice in the southern China. Advances in Climate Change Research, 1, 151-156. (in Chinese)

Zhang Z, Liu X F, Wang P, Shuai J B, Chen Y, Song X, Tao F L. 2014. The heat deficit index depicts the responses of rice yield to climate change in the northeastern three provinces of China. Regional Environment Change, 14, 27-38

 Zhou L, Zhou Y H. 2011. Food security: Climate change and industrial transfer. China Population, Resources and Environment, 21, 162-168. (in Chinese)
[1] XIAN Xiao-qing, ZHAO Hao-xiang, GUO Jian-yang, ZHANG Gui-fen, LIU Hui, LIU Wan-xue, WAN Fang-hao. Estimation of the potential geographical distribution of a new potato pest (Schrankia costaestrigalis) in China under climate change[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2441-2455.
[2] YU Wen-jia, LI Hai-gang, Peteh M. NKEBIWE, YANG Xue-yun, GUO Da-yong, LI Cui-lan, ZHU Yi-yong, XIAO Jing-xiu, LI Guo-hua, SUN Zhi, Torsten MÜLLER, SHEN Jian-bo. Combining rhizosphere and soil-based P management decreased the P fertilizer demand of China by more than half based on LePA model simulations[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2509-2520.
[3] LI Dong-qing, ZHANG Ming-xue, LÜ Xin-xin, HOU Ling-ling. Does nature-based solution sustain grassland quality? Evidence from rotational grazing practice in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2567-2576.
[4] PAN Song, PENG De-liang, LI Ying-mei, CHEN Zhi-jie, ZHAI Ying-yan, LIU Chen, HONG Bo. Potential global distribution of the guava root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii under different climate change scenarios using MaxEnt ecological niche modeling[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2138-2150.
[5] FAN Ting-lu, LI Shang-zhong, ZHAO Gang, WANG Shu-ying, ZHANG Jian-jun, WANG Lei, DANG Yi, CHENG Wan-li. Response of dryland crops to climate change and drought-resistant and water-suitable planting technology: A case of spring maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2067-2079.
[6] NIU Kunyu, GUO Hui, LIU Jing. Can food security and low carbon be achieved simultaneously? —An empirical analysis of the mechanisms influencing the carbon footprint of potato and corn cultivation in irrigation areas[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1230-1243.
[7] YANG Rui, XU Hang. Water diversion and agricultural production: Evidence from China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1244-1257.
[8] HOU Jing, ZHOU Li, Jennifer IFFT, YING Rui-yao. The role of time preferences in contract breach: Evidence from Chinese poultry farmers participating in contract farming[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 623-641.
[9] Oluwaseyi Samuel OLANREWAJU, Olubukola Oluranti BABALOLA. The rhizosphere microbial complex in plant health: A review of interaction dynamics[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8): 2168-2182.
[10] Busiswa NDABA, Ashira ROOPNARAIN, Haripriya RAMA, Malik MAAZA. Biosynthesized metallic nanoparticles as fertilizers: An emerging precision agriculture strategy[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(5): 1225-1242.
[11] WANG Han-jie, Jingjing WANG, Xiaohua YU. Wastewater irrigation and crop yield: A meta-analysis[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 1215-1224.
[12] FENG Lu, CHI Bao-jie, DONG He-zhong. Cotton cultivation technology with Chinese characteristics has driven the 70-year development of cotton production in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(3): 597-609.
[13] CHU Zhen-dong, MING Bo LI Lu-lu, XUE Jun, ZHANG Wan-xu, HOU Liang-yu, XIE Rui-zhi, HOU Peng, WANG Ke-ru, LI Shao-kun . Dynamics of maize grain drying in the high latitude region of Northeast China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 365-374.
[14] ZHOU Yong, YAN Xiao-yuan, GONG Song-ling, LI Cheng-wei, ZHU Rong, ZHU Bo, LIU Zhang-yong, WANG Xiao-long, CAO Peng. Changes in paddy cropping system enhanced economic profit and ecological sustainability in central China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 566-577.
[15] Sulaiman ABDULSALAM, , PENG Huan, LIU Shi-ming, HUANG Wen-kun, KONG Ling-an, PENG De-liang . Molecular and morphological characterization of stunt nematodes of wheat, maize, and rice in the savannahs of northern Nigeria[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 586-595.
No Suggested Reading articles found!