Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (4): 630-637    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60281-6
Physiology & Biochentry · Tillage · Cultivation Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Maize Yield Gains in Northeast China in the Last Six Decades
 NIU Xing-kui, XIE Rui-zhi, LIU Xin, ZHANG Feng-lu, LI Shao-kun , GAO Shi-ju
1.Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
2.College of Agronomy, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071001, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  In 2010, Chinese maize yields increased from 961.5 kg ha-1 in 1949 to 5 453.8 kg ha-1. This increase is the result of genetic improvements, an increase in nitrogen application, and refinement of planting densities. The objective of this study was to provide a theoretical basis for maize production research by analyzing the maize yield gain characteristics. Six varieties of maize were selected for the study; each selection is representative of a typical or commonly used maize variety from a specific decade, beginning from the 1950s and continuing through each decade into the 2000s. The selections and their corresponding decade were as follows: Baihe, 1950s; Jidan 101, 1960s; Zhongdan 2, 1970s; Yedan 13, 1980s; Zhengdan 958, 1990s; and Xianyu 335, 2000s. Each variety was planted under four different densities (37 500, 52 500, 67 500, and 82 500 plants ha-1) and four different nitrogen applications (0, 150, 225, and 300 kg ha-1) to study the effects on yield gain characteristics. The obtained results demonstrated that there was a maize yield increase of 123.19% between the 1950s variety and the 2000s variety. Modern Chinese maize varieties had a higher yield advantage. They also displayed the additional potential to acquire higher yield under increased planting densities and nitrogen applications. At the present cultivation levels (planting at 67 500 plants ha-1 with 225 kg ha-1 nitrogen application), the contribution types and corresponding yield increase percentages were as follows: genetic improvement, 45.37%; agronomic-management improvement, 30.94%; and genotype× agronomicmanagement interaction, 23.69%. At high-yielding cultivation levels (planting at 82 500 plants ha-1 with 300 kg ha-1 nitrogen application), the contribution types and corresponding yield increase percentages were as follows: genetic improvement, 31.30%; agronomic-management improvement, 36.23%; and genotype × agronomic-management interaction, 32.47%. The contribution of agronomic-management and genotype × agronomic-management interaction to yield increase would be larger with the corresponding management improvement. To further increase maize grain yield in China, researchers should further examine the effects of agronomic-management on maize yield and the adaptation of variety to agronomic-management.

Abstract  In 2010, Chinese maize yields increased from 961.5 kg ha-1 in 1949 to 5 453.8 kg ha-1. This increase is the result of genetic improvements, an increase in nitrogen application, and refinement of planting densities. The objective of this study was to provide a theoretical basis for maize production research by analyzing the maize yield gain characteristics. Six varieties of maize were selected for the study; each selection is representative of a typical or commonly used maize variety from a specific decade, beginning from the 1950s and continuing through each decade into the 2000s. The selections and their corresponding decade were as follows: Baihe, 1950s; Jidan 101, 1960s; Zhongdan 2, 1970s; Yedan 13, 1980s; Zhengdan 958, 1990s; and Xianyu 335, 2000s. Each variety was planted under four different densities (37 500, 52 500, 67 500, and 82 500 plants ha-1) and four different nitrogen applications (0, 150, 225, and 300 kg ha-1) to study the effects on yield gain characteristics. The obtained results demonstrated that there was a maize yield increase of 123.19% between the 1950s variety and the 2000s variety. Modern Chinese maize varieties had a higher yield advantage. They also displayed the additional potential to acquire higher yield under increased planting densities and nitrogen applications. At the present cultivation levels (planting at 67 500 plants ha-1 with 225 kg ha-1 nitrogen application), the contribution types and corresponding yield increase percentages were as follows: genetic improvement, 45.37%; agronomic-management improvement, 30.94%; and genotype× agronomicmanagement interaction, 23.69%. At high-yielding cultivation levels (planting at 82 500 plants ha-1 with 300 kg ha-1 nitrogen application), the contribution types and corresponding yield increase percentages were as follows: genetic improvement, 31.30%; agronomic-management improvement, 36.23%; and genotype × agronomic-management interaction, 32.47%. The contribution of agronomic-management and genotype × agronomic-management interaction to yield increase would be larger with the corresponding management improvement. To further increase maize grain yield in China, researchers should further examine the effects of agronomic-management on maize yield and the adaptation of variety to agronomic-management.
Keywords:  maize       yield gains       varieties       nitrogen applications       plant densities  
Received: 19 March 2012   Accepted:
Fund: 

This present study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB118605).

Corresponding Authors:  NIU Xing-kui, Tel: +86-10-821085791, E-mail: nxk1981@sina.com; XIE Rui-zhi, Tel: +86-10-82105791, E-mail: xierizhi@caas.cn; LI Shao-kun, Tel: +86-10-82108891,E-mail: lishaokun@caas.cn   
About author:  NIU Xing-kui, Tel: +86-10-821085791, E-mail: nxk1981@sina.com; XIE Rui-zhi, Tel: +86-10-82105791, E-mail: xierizhi@caas.cn; LI Shao-kun, Tel: +86-10-82108891,E-mail: lishaokun@caas.cn

Cite this article: 

NIU Xing-kui, XIE Rui-zhi, LIU Xin, ZHANG Feng-lu, LI Shao-kun , GAO Shi-ju. 2013. Maize Yield Gains in Northeast China in the Last Six Decades. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(4): 630-637.

[1]Cardwell V B. 1982. Fifty years of Minnesota cornproduction: sources of yield increase. AgronomyJournal, 74, 984-990

[2]Ci X K, Zhang S H, Xie Z J, Xu J X, Lu Z Y, Zhang D G, LiX H, Xie C X, Li B, Li M S, et al. 2010. Comparison ofanalysis method of genetic yield gains for the singlecrosshybrids released during 1970s-2000s ActaAgronomica Sinica, 36, 2185-2190. (in Chinese)

[3]Ci X K, Li M S, Liang X L, Xie Z J, Zhang D G, Li X H, Lu ZY, Ru G L, Li B, Xie C X, et al. 2011. Genetic contributionto advanced yield for maize hybrids released from 1970to 2000 in China. Crop Science, 51, 13-20

[4]Castleberry R M, Crum C W, Krull C F. 1984. Genetic yieldimprovement of US maize cultivars under varyingfertility and climatic environments. Crop Science, 24,33-36

[5]Cunha Fernandes J S, Franzon J F. 1997. Thirty years ofgenetic progress in maize (Zea mays L.) in a tropicalenvironment. Maydica, 42, 21-27

[6]Dong S T, Wang K J, Hu C H. 2000. Development of canopyapparent photosynthesis among maize varieties fromdifferent eras. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 26, 700-706

[7](in Chinese)Duvick D N. 1977. Genetic rates of gains in hybrid maizeyields during the past 40 years. Maydica, 22, 187-196

[8]Duvick D N. 1984a. Genetic contribution to yield gains ofU. S. hybrid maize, 1930 to 1980. In: Fehr W R, ed.,Genetic Contributions to Yield Gains of Five MajorCrop Plants. CSSA Special Publication No. 7. CropScience Society of America, American Society ofAgronomy, Madison, WI, USA. pp. 15-47

[9]Duvick D N. 1984b. Genetic diversity in major farm cropson the farm and in reserve. Economic Botany, 38, 161-178

[10]Duvick D N. 1992. Genetic contributions to advances inyield of U.S. maize. Maydica, 37, 69-79

[11]Duvick D N. 1997. What is yield? In: Edmeades G O, B鋘zigerM, Mickelson H R, Pe馻-Valdivia C B, eds., DevelopingDrought and Low N-tolerant Maize. CIMMYT, ElBat醤, Mexico. pp. 332-335

[12]Duvick D N. 2005. Genetic progress in yield of united statesmaize (Zea mays L.). Maydica, 50, 193-202

[13]Duvick D N, Smith J S C, Cooper M. 2004. Long-termselection in a commercial hybrid maize breedingprogram. Plant Breeding Reviews, 24, 109-151

[14]Echarte L, Luque S, Andrade F H, Sadras V O, Cirilo A,Otegui M E, Vega C R C. 2000. Response of maize kernelnumber to plant density in Argentinean hybridsreleased between 1965 and 1995. Field Crops Research,68, 1-8

[15]Edmeades G O, Tollenaar M. 1990. Genetic and culturalimprovements in maize production. In: Sinha S K, SaneP V, Bhargava S C, Agrawal P K, eds., Proceedings ofthe International Congress of Plant Physiology.Society of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, NewDelhi. pp. 165-180

[16]Eyherabide G H, Damilano A L. 2001. Comparison of geneticgains for grain yield of maize between the 1980s and1990s in Argentina. Maydica, 46, 277-281

[17]Eyherabide G H, Damilano A L, Colazo J C. 1994. Geneticgains for grain yield of maize in Argentina. Maydica,39, 207-211

[18]Frei O M. 2000. Changes in yield physiology of corn as aresult of breeding in northern Europe. Maydica, 45,173-183

[19]Hallaue A R. 1973. Hybrid development and populationimprovement in maize by reciprocal full-sib selection.Egyptian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 2, 84-101

[20]Li S K, Wang C T. 2008. Analysis on change of productionand factors promoting yield increase of corn in china.Journal of Maize Sciences, 16, 26-30

[21](in Chinese)Lu Z Y, Li M S, Xie Z J, Xie C X, Li X H. 2010. Study on thetrend of yield components among maize hybrids inChina. Journal of Maize Sciences, 18, 13-17

[22](in Chinese)McCullough D E, Mihajlovic M, Aguilera A, Tollenaar M,Giradin P H. 1994. Inluence of N supply on developmentand dry matter accumulation of an old and a new maizehybrid. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 74, 471-477

[23]Ru G L, Li X H, LI M S. 2010. Analysis on yield and otheragronomic traits of maize varieties in different eras inHainan location. Journal of Maize Sciences, 18, 43-46

[24](in Chinese)Russell W A. 1974. Comparative performance for maizehybrids representing different eras of maize breeding.In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Corn and SorghumResearch Conference. American Seed TradeAssociation, Chicago, Illinois. pp. 81-101

[25]Russell W A. 1985. Evaluation for plant, ear, and graintraits of maize cultivars representing different eras ofbreeding. Maydica, 30, 85-96

[26]Russell W A. 1991. Genetic improvement of maize yields.Advances in Agronomy, 46, 245-298

[27]Tollenaar M. 1989. Genetic improvement in grain yield ofcommercial maize hybrids grown in Ontario from 1959to 1988. Crop Science, 29, 1365-1371

[28]Tollenaar M, Aguilera A. 1992. Radiation use efficiency ofan old and new maize hybrid. Agronomy Journal, 84,536-541

[29]Tollenaar M, McCullough D E, Dwyer L M. 1994.Physiological basis of the genetic improvement of corn.In: Slafer G A, ed., Genetic Improvement of Field Crops.Marcel Dekker, New York. pp. 183-236

[30]Tollenaar M, Lee E A. 2002. Yield potential, yield stabilityand stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Research,75, 161-169

[31]Troyer A F. 1990. A retrospective view of corn geneticresource. Journal of Heredity, 81, 17-24

[32]Wang K J, Dong S T, Hu C H, Liu K C, Sun Q Q. 2001.Improvement in photosynthetic characteristics amongmaize varieties in China from the 1950s to the 1990s.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 25, 247-251 (in Chinese)

[33]Xie Z J, Xu J X, Li M S, Zhang S H. 2009. Contributions ofgenetic improvement to yields of maize hybrids duringdifferent eras in north China. Scientia AgriculturaSinica, 42, 781-789 (in Chinese)

[34]Zhang Z M, Liu F M, Liu X Y. 1998. Genetic contributionsto kernel yield and yield components of hybrid maize,1963 to 1993 in Henan Province. Acta AgronomicaSinica, 24, 182-186. (in Chinese)
[1] Lichao Zhai, Shijia Song, Lihua Zhang, Jinan Huang, Lihua Lv, Zhiqiang Dong, Yongzeng Cui, Mengjing Zheng, Wanbin Hou, Jingting Zhang, Yanrong Yao, Yanhong Cui, Xiuling Jia. Subsoiling before winter wheat alleviates the kernel position effect of densely grown summer maize by delaying post-silking root–shoot senescence[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3384-3402.
[2] Ling Ai, Ju Qiu, Jiuguang Wang, Mengya Qian, Tingting Liu, Wan Cao, Fangyu Xing, Hameed Gul, Yingyi Zhang, Xiangling Gong, Jing Li, Hong Duan, Qianlin Xiao, Zhizhai Liu. A naturally occurring 31 bp deletion in TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 causes branched ears in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(9): 3322-3333.
[3] Dan Lü, Jianxin Li, Xuehai Zhang, Ran Zheng, Aoni Zhang, Jingyun Luo, Bo Tong, Hongbing Luo, Jianbing Yan, Min Deng. Genetic analysis of maize crude fat content by multi-locus genome-wide association study[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(7): 2475-2491.
[4] Lihua Xie, Lingling Li, Junhong Xie, Jinbin Wang, Zechariah Effah, Setor Kwami Fudjoe, Muhammad Zahid Mumtaz. A suitable organic fertilizer substitution ratio stabilizes rainfed maize yields and reduces gaseous nitrogen loss in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2138-2154.
[5] Chunxiang Li, Yongfeng Song, Yong Zhu, Mengna Cao, Xiao Han, Jinsheng Fan, Zhichao Lü, Yan Xu, Yu Zhou, Xing Zeng, Lin Zhang, Ling Dong, Dequan Sun, Zhenhua Wang, Hong Di. GWAS analysis reveals candidate genes associated with density tolerance (ear leaf structure) in maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(6): 2046-2062.
[6] Huairen Zhang, Tauseef Taj Kiani, Huabang Chen, Juan Liu, Xunji Chen. Genome wide association analysis reveals multiple QTLs controlling root development in maize [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(5): 1656-1670.
[7] Lanjie Zheng, Qianlong Zhang, Huiying Liu, Xiaoqing Wang, Xiangge Zhang, Zhiwei Hu, Shi Li, Li Ji, Manchun Ji, Yong Gu, Jiaheng Yang, Yong Shi, Yubi Huang, Xu Zheng. Fine mapping and discovery of MIR172e, a candidate gene required for inflorescence development and lower floret abortion in maize ear[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(4): 1372-1389.
[8] Xiaoxia Guo, Wanmao Liu, Yunshan Yang, Guangzhou Liu, Bo Ming, Ruizhi Xie, Keru Wang, Shaokun Li, Peng Hou. Matching the light and nitrogen distributions in the maize canopy to achieve high yield and high radiation use efficiency[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(4): 1424-1435.
[9] Yang Wang, Chunhua Mu, Xiangdong Li, Canxing Duan, Jianjun Wang, Xin Lu, Wangshu Li, Zhennan Xu, Shufeng Sun, Ao Zhang, Zhiqiang Zhou, Shenghui Wen, Zhuanfang Hao, Jienan Han, Jianzhou Qu, Wanli Du, Fenghai Li, Jianfeng Weng. A genome-wide association study and transcriptome analysis reveal the genetic basis for the Southern corn rust resistance in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(2): 453-466.
[10] Hong Ren, Zheng Liu, Xinbing Wang, Wenbin Zhou, Baoyuan Zhou, Ming Zhao, Congfeng Li. Long-term excessive nitrogen application decreases spring maize nitrogen use efficiency via suppressing root physiological characteristics[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(11): 4195-4210.
[11] Yulong Wang, Aizhong Yu, Pengfei Wang, Yongpan Shang, Feng Wang, Hanqiang Lü, Xiaoneng Pang, Yue Li, Yalong Liu, Bo Yin, Dongling Zhang, Jianzhe Huo, Keqiang Jiang, Qiang Chai. No-tillage with total green manure mulching increases maize yield through improved soil moisture and temperature environment and enhanced maize root structure and photosynthetic capacity[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(11): 4211-4224.
[12] Fei Bao, Ping Zhang, Qiying Yu, Yunfei Cai, Bin Chen, Heping Tan, Hailiang Han, Junfeng Hou, Fucheng Zhao. Response of fresh maize yield to nitrogen application rates and  characteristics of nitrogen-efficient varieties[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(10): 3803-3818.
[13] Tianqi Wang, Jihui Tian, Xing Lu, Chang Liu, Junhua Ao, Huafu Mai, Jinglin Tan, Bingbing Zhang, Cuiyue Liang, Jiang Tian. Soybean variety influences the advantages of nutrient uptake and yield in soybean/maize intercropping via regulating root-root interaction and rhizobacterial composition[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2025, 24(10): 4048-4062.
[14] Xin Dong, Baole Li, Zhenzhen Yan, Ling Guan, Shoubing Huang , Shujun Li, Zhiyun Qi, Ling Tang, Honglin Tian, Zhongjun Fu, Hua Yang. Impacts of high temperature, relative air humidity, and vapor pressure deficit on the seed set of contrasting maize genotypes during flowering[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(9): 2955-2969.
[15] Peng Liu, Langlang Ma, Siyi Jian, Yao He, Guangsheng Yuan, Fei Ge, Zhong Chen, Chaoying Zou, Guangtang Pan, Thomas Lübberstedt, Yaou Shen. Population genomic analysis reveals key genetic variations and the driving force for embryonic callus induction capability in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2178-2195.
No Suggested Reading articles found!