Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2012, Vol. 12 Issue (4): 576-584    DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(00)8577
PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY · TILLAGE · CULTIVATION Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
A Novel Approach to the Water Uptake Dynamics in Roots of Maize, Wheat and Barley Under Salt Stress
 BU Qing-mei, BIAN Dian-xia, LIU Lin-de , ZHU Jian-jun
1.College of Life Sciences, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  The water uptake dynamics in maize, wheat, and barley under salt stress were investigated with a xylem pressure probe. The average xylem pressure responses to salt stress in the three plants were 36, 93, and 89% of the osmotic stresses for maize, wheat, and barley, respectively, which are significantly smaller than the magnitude of the osmotic stresses being applied. In order to explain the thermodynamic discrepancies among the water potential changes in the root xylem of the three plants, a novel approach, tentatively named the “symplastic flow dilution model” was proposed in this paper. The model was presented in an attempt to give answers to the problem of how the roots under salt stress could absorb water when the water potential of the xylem sap is considerably higher than that of the solution in the root ambient. According to the model, the salt solution in the microenvironment of the endodermis of a root was diluted to some extent by the efflux from cells so the central stele of the root is not exposed to the same solution bathing the root with the same salt concentration. In contrast, we also presented another approach, the “reflection coefficient progression approach”, which was less likely to be true because it requires a considerable amount of solute to be transported into the root xylem when the salt stress is severe.

Abstract  The water uptake dynamics in maize, wheat, and barley under salt stress were investigated with a xylem pressure probe. The average xylem pressure responses to salt stress in the three plants were 36, 93, and 89% of the osmotic stresses for maize, wheat, and barley, respectively, which are significantly smaller than the magnitude of the osmotic stresses being applied. In order to explain the thermodynamic discrepancies among the water potential changes in the root xylem of the three plants, a novel approach, tentatively named the “symplastic flow dilution model” was proposed in this paper. The model was presented in an attempt to give answers to the problem of how the roots under salt stress could absorb water when the water potential of the xylem sap is considerably higher than that of the solution in the root ambient. According to the model, the salt solution in the microenvironment of the endodermis of a root was diluted to some extent by the efflux from cells so the central stele of the root is not exposed to the same solution bathing the root with the same salt concentration. In contrast, we also presented another approach, the “reflection coefficient progression approach”, which was less likely to be true because it requires a considerable amount of solute to be transported into the root xylem when the salt stress is severe.
Keywords:  maize      wheat      barley      salt stress      xylem pressure      water transport  
Received: 04 March 2011   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB421303).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence ZHU Jian-jun, Tel: +86-535-6681053, E-mail: jzjzhu@gmail.com   

Cite this article: 

BU Qing-mei, BIAN Dian-xia, LIU Lin-de , ZHU Jian-jun. 2012. A Novel Approach to the Water Uptake Dynamics in Roots of Maize, Wheat and Barley Under Salt Stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(4): 576-584.

[1]Bai X F, Zhu J J, Zhang P, Wang Y H, Yang L Q, Zhang L. 2007. Na+ and water uptake in relation to the radial reflection coefficient of root in arrowleaf saltbush under salt stress. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 49, 1334-1340.

[2]Balling A, Zimmermann U. 1990. Comparative measurements of the xylem pressure of Nicotiana plants by means of the pressure bomb and pressure probe. Planta, 182, 325-338.

[3]Canny M J. 1995. A new theory for the ascent of sap: cohesion supported by tissue pressure. Annuals of Botany, 75, 343-357.

[4]Canny M J. 1998. Transporting water in plants. American Scientist, 86, 152-159.

[5]Dainty J, Ginzburg B Z. 1964. The reflection of coefficient of plant cell membranes for certain solutes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (Specialized Section on Biophysical Subjects), 79, 129-137.

[6]Enns L C, Canny M J, McCully M E. 2000. An investigation of the role of solutes in the xylem sap and in the xylem parenchyma as the source of root pressure. Protoplasma, 211, 183-197.

[7]Enns L C, McCully M E, Canny M J. 1998. Solute concentrations in xylem sap along vessels of maize primary roots at high root pressure. Journal of Experimental Botany, 29, 1539-1544.

[8]Fiscus E L. 1977. Determination of hydraulic and osmotic properties of soybean root systems. Plant Physiology, 59, 1013-1020.

[9]Ginsburg H, Ginsburg B Z. 1970. Radial water and solute flows in roots of Zea mays. Journal of Experimental Botany, 21, 580-592.

[10]Hanson P J, Sucoff E I, Markhart A H. 1985. Quantifying apoplastic flux through red pine root systems using trisodium 3-hydroxy-5,8,10-pyrenetrisulfonate. Plant Physiology, 77, 21-24.

[11]Hose E, Clarkson D T, Steudle E, Schreiber L, Hartung W. 2001. The exodermis -a variable apoplastic barrier. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 2245-2264.

[12]House C R. 1974. Water Transport in Cells and Tissues. Edward Arnold, London. Miller D M. 1985a. Studies of root function in Zea mays. III. Xylem sap composition at maximum root pressure provides evidence of active transport into the xylem and a measurement of the reflection coefficient of the root. Plant Physiology, 77, 162-167.

[13]Miller D M. 1985b. Studies of root function in Zea mays. IV. Effects of applied pressure on the hydraulic conductivity and volume flow through the excised root. Plant Physiology, 77, 168-174.

[14]Miyamoto N, Steudle E, Hirasawa T, Lafitte R. 2001. Hydraulic conductivity of rice roots. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 1835-1846.

[15]Munns R, Passioura J B. 1984. Effect of prolonged exposure to NaCl on the osmotic pressure of leaf xylem sap from intact, transpiting barley plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 11, 497-507.

[16]Ranathunge K, Kotula L, Steudle E, Lafitte R. 2004. Water permeability and reflection coefficient of the outer part of young rice roots are differently affected by closure of water channels (aquaporins) or blockage of apoplastic pores. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 433-447.

[17]Rygol J, Zimmermann U. 1990. Radial and axial turgor pressure measurements in individual root cells of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum grown under various saline conditions. Plant, Cell and Environment, 13, 15-26.

[18]Rygol J, Pritchard J, Zhu J J, Tomos A D, Zimmermann U. 1993. Transpiration induces radial turgor pressure gradients in wheat and maize roots. Plant Physiology, 103, 493-500.

[19]Schneider H, Zhu J J, Zimmermann U. 1997. Xylem and cell turgor pressure probe measurements in intact roots of glycophytes: transpiration induces a change in the radial and cellular reflection coefficients. Plant Cell Environment, 20, 221-229.

[20]Shabala S, Shabala S, Cuin T A, Pang J, Percey W, Chen Z, Conn S, Eing C, Wegner L H. 2010. Xylem ionic relations and salinity tolerance in barley. The Plant Journal, 61, 839-853.

[21]Steudle E. 2002. Transport of water in plants. Environment Control in Biology, 40, 29-37.

[22]Steudle E, Murrmann M, Peterson C A. 1993. Transport of water and solutes across maize roots modified by puncturing the endodermis: further evidence of the composite transport model of the root. Plant Physiology, 103, 335-349.

[23]Steudle E, Peterson C A. 1998. How does water get through roots? Journal of Experimental Botany, 49, 775-788.

[24]Varney G T, McCully M E, Canny M J. 1993. Sites of entry of water into the symplast of maize roots. New Phytologist, 125, 733-741.

[25]Weatherley P E. 1982. Water uptake and flow in roots. In: Lange O L, Nobel P S, Osmond C B, Ziegler H, eds., Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, vol. 12B. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 79-109.

[26]Wei C, Tyree M T, Steudle E. 1999. Direct measurement of xylem pressure in leaves of intact maize plants. A test of the cohesion-tension theory taking hydraulic architecture into consideration. Plant Physiology, 121, 1191-1205.

[27]Zholkevich V N, Chugunova T V, Kordev A V. 1990. New data on the nature of root pressure. Studia Biophysica, 130, 209-216.

[28]Zhu J J, Bai X F, Zhang P, Bu Q M. 2005. Self-regulation of xylem pressure in barley roots under salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 31, 97-102. (in Chinese)

[29]Zhu J J, Zimmermann U, Thürmer F, Haase A. 1995. Xylem pressure in maize roots subjected to osmotic stress: determination of radial reflection coefficients by using the xylem pressure probe. Plant Cell and Environment, 18, 906-912.

[30]Zimmermann U, Haase A, Langbein D, Meinzer F. 1993. Mechanism of long-distance water transport in plants: a re-examination of some paradigms in the light of new evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, 341, 19-31.

[31]Zimmermann U, Rygol J, Balling A, Klock G, Metzler A, Haase A. 1992. Radial turgor and osmotic pressure profiles in intact and excised roots of Aster tripolium. Pressure probe measurements and nuclear magnetic resonance-imaging analysis. Plant Physiology, 99, 186-196.

[32]Zimmermann U, Zhu J J, Meinzer F C, Goldstein G, Schneider H, Zimmermann G, Benkert R, Thurmer F, Melcher P, Webb D, et al. 1994. High molecular weight organic compounds in the xylem sap of mangroves: implications for long-distance water transport. Botanica Acta, 107, 218-229.
[1] Pan Hou, Qiang Gao, Yingkai Ren, Jinhong Yu, Lijun Gao, Xiaoxue Liu, Dong Jiang, Weixing Cao, Tingbo Dai, Zhongwei Tian. Straw returning and night-warming improve grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of winter wheat under rice-wheat rotation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(4): 0-.
[2] Guoming Li, Xiaotian Ren, Shengyan Pang, Changjie Feng, Yuxi Niu, Yanjie Qu, Changhong Liu, Xiang Lin, Dong Wang. Nitrogen redistribution during the grain-filling stage and its correlation with senescence and TaATG8 expression in leaves of winter wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(4): 0-.
[3] Yuhuai Liu, Heng Wang, Li Wang, Jina Ding, Hui Zhai, Qiujin Ma, Can Hu, Tida Ge. Microplastics reduce the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) net photosynthetic rate through rhizospheric effects[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(3): 1263-1275.
[4] Xiaodong Fan, Xiaotao Hu, Yakun Wang, Dianyu Chen, Wene Wang, Fang Wang, Qing Zha. Deep storage irrigation can recharge farmland deep soil moisture and sustain production of summer maize (Zea mays L.) through flood resources utilization in irrigation districts of northern China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(3): 1243-1262.
[5] Jie Shuai, Qiang Tu, Yicong Zhang, Xiaobo Xia, Yuhua Wang, Shulin Cao, Yifan Dong, Xinli Zhou, Xu Zhang, Zhengguang Zhang, Yi He, Gang Li. Silence of five Fusarium graminearum genes in wheat host confers resistance to Fusarium head blight[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(3): 1051-1063.
[6] Jili Xu, Shuo Liu, Zhiyuan Gao, Qingdong Zeng, Xiaowen Zhang, Dejun Han, Hui Tian. Genome-wide association study reveals genomic regions for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium use efficiency in bread wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(3): 847-863.
[7] Shuwei Zhang, Jiajia Zhao, Haiyan Zhang, Duoduo Fu, Ling Qiao, Bangbang Wu, Xiaohua Li, Yuqiong Hao, Xingwei Zheng, Zhen Liang, Zhijian Chang, Jun Zheng. Structural chromosome variations from Jinmai 47 and Jinmai 84 affected agronomic traits and drought tolerance of wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(3): 864-878.
[8] Zhenlong Wang, Pin He, Xuyao Li, Tieshan Liu, Saud Shah, Hao Ren, Baizhao Ren, Peng Liu, Jiwang Zhang, Bin Zhao. Enhancing yield of modern maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids through optimization of population photosynthetic capacity and light-nitrogen use efficiency under high planting density[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(3): 938-951.
[9] Ping Lin, Shanshan Liu, Zhidan Fu, Kai Luo, Yiling Li, Xinyue Peng, Xiaoting Yuan, Lida Yang, Tian Pu, Yuze Li, Taiwen Yong, Wenyu Yang. Rhizosphere flavonoids alleviate inhibition of soybean nodulation caused by shading under maize–soybean strip intercropping[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(3): 952-964.
[10] Teng Li, Shumei Wang, Qing Liu, Xuepeng Zhang, Lin Chen, Yuanquan Chen, Wangsheng Gao, Peng Sui. Effects of changing assimilate supply on starch synthesis in maize kernels under high temperature stress[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 639-647.
[11] Lin Wang, Fei Liu, Yumeng Bian, Mudi Sun, Zhensheng Kang, Jie Zhao. Revealing inheritance of a Xinjiang isolate BGTB-1 of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici and the shift of pathogenicity from avirulence to virulence at heterozygous AvrYr5 locus[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 744-755.
[12] Jingye Cheng, Rui Pan, Wenying Zhang, Tianhua He, Chengdao Li. An ancient super allele of the Vrs1 gene driving the recent success in modern barley improvement through optimising spike architecture[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(2): 602-609.
[13] Xiaohui Xu, Qiang Chai, Falong Hu, Wen Yin, Zhilong Fan, Hanting Li, Zhipeng Liu, Qiming Wang. Intercropping grain crops with green manure under reduced chemical nitrogen improves the soil carbon stocks by optimizing aggregates in an oasis irrigation area[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 326-338.
[14] Ziwen Shi, Sheng Zhang, Qing He, Xiaoyuan Wang, Bo yang, Tao Yu, Hongyang Yi, Tingzhao Rong, Moju Cao. ZmCals12 impacts maize growth and development by regulating symplastic transport[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 42-55.
[15] Qinghao Wang, Juan Hu, Weizhen Yu, Limin Gu, Peng Liu, Bin Zhao, Wenchao Zhen, Jiwang Zhang, Baizhao Ren. Shading and waterlogging interactions exacerbate summer maize yield losses by reducing assimilate accumulation and remobilization processes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026, 25(1): 92-104.
No Suggested Reading articles found!