|
|
|
|
|
| Effect of Plant Density on Wild Oat Competition with Competitive and Non- Competitive Wheat Cultivars |
| Mohammad Armin , Mohammed Asghripour |
1.Department of Agronomy, Sabzevar Branch, Islamic Azad University
2.Department of Agriculture, University of Zabol |
|
|
|
摘要 Wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) is one of the worst weeds in wheat fields. The effect of wheat density on wild oat competition with more or less competitive wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum) was investigated at the Experimental Farm of Plant Pests and Diseases Research Institute, Karaj, Iran. The experiment was established as a factorial combination of wheat varieties Roshan as non-competitive and Niknejad as competitive; three wheat densities (recommended density, recommended+25%, and recommended+50%, corresponding respectively with 300, 375, and 450 plants m-2 for Roshan and 400, 500, and 600 plants m-2 for Niknejad) and four wild oat densities (0, 25, 50, and 75 plants m-2) were selected for this experiment. Hyperbolic equations were used to describe relationship between yield and weed density. Increase in wheat density reduced wild oat biomass. Maximum wild oat biomass was achieved at the highest density of the wild oat together with the lowest wheat density. The results showed that higher densities of wheat are able to suppress wild oat dry matter production. Inter-specific competition in Niknejad was 1.7 times more than that in Roshan. Maximum yields of Niknejad and Roshan in the presence of wild oat were obtained at recommended density+25% and recommended density, respectively. Increase in wheat density leads to a decrease in wheat yield due to an increase in intra-specific competition. Increase in wild oat density results in the reduction of wheat yield through decrease in fertile tiller per plant and spike m-2.
Abstract Wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) is one of the worst weeds in wheat fields. The effect of wheat density on wild oat competition with more or less competitive wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum) was investigated at the Experimental Farm of Plant Pests and Diseases Research Institute, Karaj, Iran. The experiment was established as a factorial combination of wheat varieties Roshan as non-competitive and Niknejad as competitive; three wheat densities (recommended density, recommended+25%, and recommended+50%, corresponding respectively with 300, 375, and 450 plants m-2 for Roshan and 400, 500, and 600 plants m-2 for Niknejad) and four wild oat densities (0, 25, 50, and 75 plants m-2) were selected for this experiment. Hyperbolic equations were used to describe relationship between yield and weed density. Increase in wheat density reduced wild oat biomass. Maximum wild oat biomass was achieved at the highest density of the wild oat together with the lowest wheat density. The results showed that higher densities of wheat are able to suppress wild oat dry matter production. Inter-specific competition in Niknejad was 1.7 times more than that in Roshan. Maximum yields of Niknejad and Roshan in the presence of wild oat were obtained at recommended density+25% and recommended density, respectively. Increase in wheat density leads to a decrease in wheat yield due to an increase in intra-specific competition. Increase in wild oat density results in the reduction of wheat yield through decrease in fertile tiller per plant and spike m-2.
|
|
Received: 14 November 2010
Accepted:
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence Mohammad Armin, Ph D, Tel: +98-915-5716747, Fax: +98-571-2647513, E-mail: Moh_armin@yahoo.com
|
Cite this article:
Mohammad Armin , Mohammed Asghripour.
2011.
Effect of Plant Density on Wild Oat Competition with Competitive and Non- Competitive Wheat Cultivars. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10(10): 1554-1561.
|
| [1]Baghestani M A, Zand E. 2005. Evaluate the Competitive Ability of Wheat Varieties in Contrast of Dominant Narrow Leaf Weeds. Pests and Diseases Research Institute. Registration No. 961/87. p. 64. [2]Carlson H L, Hill J E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Science, 33, 176-181. [3]Cosser N D, Gooding M J, Thompson A J, Froud-Williams R J. 1997. Competitive ability and tolerance of organically grown wheat cultivars to natural weed infestation. Annual of Applied Biolology, 130, 523-535. [4]Cousens R D, Warringa J W, Cameron J E, Hoy V. 2001. Early growth and development of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) in relation to wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52, 755-769. [5]Dezfooli A. 2000. Competition between wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). MSc thesis, University of Guelph. p. 106. [6]Hassanzadeh-Dlvyy M. 2002. Wheat ideotype designing to compete with weeds. Ph D thesis, Islamic Azad University. Science and Research Branch of Tehran. p. 125. (in Persian) [7]Izquierdo J, Recasvs J, Quintanilla C F, Gill G. 2003. Effects of crop and weed densities on the interactions between barley and Lolium rigidum in several Mediterranean locations. Agronomie, 23, 529-536. [8]Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Coombes N. 1995. Losses in grain yield of winter crops from Lolium rigidum competition depend on crop species cultivars and season. Weed Research, 35, 503- 509. [9]Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Cousen R D, Coombes N E. 1996. The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weed. Weed Research, 36, 505-513. [10]Lutman P J W, Dixon L, Risiott R. 1994. The response of four spring sown combinable arable crops to weed competition. Weed Research, 34, 137-146. [11]Montazeri M E, Zand E, Baghestani M A. 2005. Weed Control in Wheat Fields in Iran. Agricultural Education Publication, Iran. p. 85. (in Persian) Morishita D W, Thill D C. l988. Factors of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference on spring barley (Hordum vulgare) growth and yield. Weed Science, 36, 37-42. [12]Mortensen D A, Dielieman J A. 1998. Why weed patches persist: dynamics of edges and density. In: Medd R W, Pratley J E, eds., Precision Weed Management in Crops and Pastures. Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia. [13]Qasum J, Hill A. 1994. Inter and intra specific competition of fat-hen (Chenopodium album) and groundsel (Senecio vulgais). Weed Research, 34, 109-118. [14]Roberts J R, Peeper T F, Solie J B. 2001. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) row spacing, seeding rate and cultivar affect interference from rye (Secale cereale). Weed Technology, 15, 19-25. [15]Salimi H, Angjy J. 2002. Damage assessment of different densities of wild oats competition in winter wheat. Plant Diseases, 38, 251-362. (in Persian) [16]Zand E. 2000. Study of eco-physiological properties of Iranian wheat cultivars, morphology, physiology, competition within and between species perspective (50-year trend). Ph D thesis, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
