|
Special Issue:
油料作物合辑Oil Crops
|
|
|
|
| Interactive effect of shade and PEG-induced osmotic stress on physiological responses of soybean seedlings |
Muhammad Ahsan ASGHAR1, 3, JIANG Heng-ke1, 3, SHUI Zhao-wei1, 2, CAO Xi-yu1, HUANG Xi-yu1, Shakeel IMRAN4, Bushra AHMAD5, ZHANG Hao1, YANG Yue-ning1, SHANG Jing1, 2, YANG Hui1, 2, YU Liang1, 3, LIU Chun-yan1, 3, YANG Wen-yu1, 3, SUN Xin1, 2, 3, DU Jun-bo1, 2, 3 |
1 College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China
2 Research Center for Modern Agriculture of the Middle East, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China
3 Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, P.R.China
4 Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (UAF)|UAF Sub-Campus, Burewala 61010, Pakistan
5 Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan |
|
|
|
|
摘要
本文探讨了PEG诱导的渗透胁迫与荫蔽效应之间的关系。荫蔽和非荫蔽条件下，大豆品种C-103受到聚乙二醇（PEG-6000）诱导的渗透胁迫。在两种光环境中，PEG诱导的渗透胁迫都显著降低了相对含水量、形态参数、碳水化合物和叶绿素含量，大豆幼苗的渗透调节物质、活性氧和抗氧化酶明显增加。本研究表明，在非荫蔽条件下生长的大豆幼苗，PEG诱导的渗透胁迫比荫蔽下的幼苗产生更多的丙二醛和过氧化氢。同样，在干旱胁迫下，被遮荫的植株比不被荫蔽的植株积累了更多的糖和脯氨酸。因此，本研究结果揭示了未遮荫的植物比遮荫的植物对 PEG诱导的渗透胁迫更敏感，这提示荫蔽可以增强植物对渗透胁迫的保护机制，或者至少不会增强 PEG诱导的渗透胁迫对大豆幼苗的不利影响。
Abstract Intensively farmed crops used to experience numerous environmental stresses. Among these, shade and drought significantly influence the morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes of plants. However, the interactive effect of shade and drought on the growth and development of soybean under dense cropping systems has not been reported yet. This study investigated the interactive effect of PEG-induced osmotic stress and shade on soybean seedlings. The soybean cultivar viz., C-103 was subjected to PEG-induced osmotic stress from polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG-6000) under shading and non-shading conditions. PEG-induced osmotic stress significantly reduced the relative water contents, morphological parameters, carbohydrates and chlorophyll contents under both light environments. A significant increase was observed in osmoprotectants, reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzymes in soybean seedlings. Henceforth, the findings revealed that, seedlings grown under non-shading conditions produced more malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide contents as compared to the shade-treated plants when subjected to PEG-induced osmotic stress. Likewise, the shaded plants accumulated more sugars and proline than non-shaded ones under drought stress. Moreover, it was found that non-shaded grown plants were more sensitive to PEG-induced osmotic stress than those exposed to shading conditions, which suggested that shade could boost the protective mechanisms against osmotic stress or at least would not exaggerate the adverse effects of PEG-induced osmotic stress in soybean seedlings.
|
|
Received: 20 April 2020
Accepted:
|
| Fund: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871552 and 31671445), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program, China (2018HH0108) and the Sichuan Innovation Team Project of National Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System, China (sccxtd-2020-20). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence SUN Xin, E-mail: sunxin@sicau.edu.cn; DU Jun-bo, E-mail: junbodu@sicau.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
Muhammad Ahsan ASGHAR, JIANG Heng-ke, SHUI Zhao-wei, CAO Xi-yu, HUANG Xi-yu, Shakeel IMRAN, Bushra AHMAD, ZHANG Hao, YANG Yue-ning, SHANG Jing, YANG Hui, YU Liang, LIU Chun-yan, YANG Wen-yu, SUN Xin, DU Jun-bo.
2021.
Interactive effect of shade and PEG-induced osmotic stress on physiological responses of soybean seedlings. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(9): 2382-2394.
|
Abbaspour H, Rezaei H. 2014. Effects of salicylic acid and jasmonic acid on hill reaction and photosynthetic pigment (Dracocephalum moldavica L.) in different levels of drought stress. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2, 2850–2859.
Asghar M A, Du J, Jiang H, Li Y, Sun X, Shang J, Liu J, Liu W, Imran S, Iqbal N. 2020. Shade pretreatment enhanced drought resistance of soybean. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 171, 103952.
Barro F, De La Haba P, Maldonado J, Fontes A. 1989. Effect of light quality on growth contents of carbohydrates protein and pigments and nitrate reductase activity in soybean plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 134, 586–591.
Baxter A, Mittler R, Suzuki N. 2013. ROS as key players in plant stress signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65, 1229–1240.
Beis A, Patakas A. 2015. Differential physiological and biochemical responses to drought in grapevines subjected to partial root drying and deficit irrigation. European Journal of Agronomy, 62, 90–97.
Carvalho M H C D. 2008. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: Production scavenging and signaling. Plant Signaling Behaviour, 3, 156–165.
Casal J J. 2013. Photoreceptor signaling networks in plant responses to shade. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 64, 403–427.
Castro P, Puertolas J, Dodd I C. 2019. Stem girdling uncouples soybean stomatal conductance from leaf water potential by enhancing leaf xylem ABA concentration. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 159, 149–156.
Chami D E, Moujabber M E. 2016. Drought climate change and sustainability of water in agriculture: A roadmap towards the NWRS2. South African Journal of Science, 112, 1–4.
Chaves M M, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany, 103, 551–560.
Clement M, Lambert A, Herouart D, Boncompagni E. 2008. Identification of new up-regulated genes under drought stress in soybean nodules. Gene, 426, 15–22.
Cornic G. 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture - not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science, 5, 187–188.
Correia M J, Osório M L, Osório J, Barrote I, Martins M, David M M. 2006. Influence of transient shade periods on the effects of drought on photosynthesis carbohydrate accumulation and lipid peroxidation in sunflower leaves. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 58, 75–84.
Dai Y, Shen Z, Liu Y, Wang L, Hannaway D, Lu H. 2009. Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 65, 177–182.
Djilianov D, Georgieva T, Moyankova D, Atanassov A, Shinozaki K, Smeeken S C M, Verma D P S, Murata N. 2005. Improved abiotic stress tolerance in plants by accumulation of osmoprotectants - gene transfer approach. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 19, 63–71.
Du J, Han T, Gai J, Yong T, Sun X, Wang X, Yang F, Liu J, Shu K, Liu W. 2018a. Maize–soybean strip intercropping: Achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17, 747–754.
Du J, Jiang H, Sun X, Li Y, Liu Y, Sun M, Fan Z, Cao Q, Feng L, Shang J. 2018b. Auxin and gibberellins are required for the receptor-like kinase ERECTA regulated hypocotyl elongation in shade avoidance in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 124.
Duan B, Li Y, Zhang X, Korpelainen H, Li C. 2009. Water deficit affects mesophyll limitation of leaves more strongly in sun than in shade in two contrasting Picea asperata populations. Tree Physiology, 29, 1551–1561.
Duan B, Lu Y, Yin C, Junttila O, Li C. 2005. Physiological responses to drought and shade in two contrasting Picea asperata populations. Physiologia Plantarum, 124, 476–484.
Fan H, Ding L, Xu Y, Du C. 2017. Antioxidant system and photosynthetic characteristics responses to short-term PEG-induced drought stress in cucumber seedling leaves. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 64, 162–173.
Filippou P, Bouchagier P, Skotti E, Fotopoulos V. 2014. Proline and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species metabolism is involved in the tolerant response of the invasive plant species Ailanthus altissima to drought and salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 97, 1–10.
Galmés J, Ribas-Carbó M, Medrano H, Flexas J. 2011. Rubisco activity in Mediterranean species is regulated by the chloroplastic CO2 concentration under water stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 653–665.
Gunes A, Inal A, Adak M, Bagci E, Cicek N, Eraslan F. 2008. Effect of drought stress implemented at pre-or post-anthesis stage on some physiological parameters as screening criteria in chickpea cultivars. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 55, 59–67.
Guo Y, Tian S, Liu S, Wang W, Sui N. 2018. Energy dissipation and antioxidant enzyme system protect photosystem II of sweet sorghum under drought stress. Photosynthetica, 56, 861–872.
Gupta A K, Kaur N. 2005. Sugar signalling and gene expression in relation to carbohydrate metabolism under abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Biosciences, 30, 761–776.
Haupt-Herting S, Fock H P. 2002. Oxygen exchange in relation to carbon assimilation in water-stressed leaves during photosynthesis. Annals of Botany, 89, 851–859.
Holmgren M. 2000. Combined effects of shade and drought on tulip poplar seedlings: Trade-off in tolerance or facilitation? Oikos, 90, 67–78.
Hossain M A, Fujita M. 2010. Evidence for a role of exogenous glycinebetaine and proline in antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems in mung bean seedlings under salt stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 16, 19–29.
Huang X, Yin C, Duan B, Li C. 2008. Interactions between drought and shade on growth and physiological traits in two Populus cathayana populations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38, 1877–1887.
Hussain S, Iqbal N, Brestic M, Raza M A, Pang T, Langham D R, Safdar M E, Ahmed S, Wen B, Gao Y. 2019a. Changes in morphology chlorophyll fluorescence performance and Rubisco activity of soybean in response to foliar application of ionic titanium under normal light and shade environment. Science of the Total Environment, 658, 626–637.
Hussain S, Iqbal N, Rahman T, Ting L, Brestic M, Safdar M E, Asghar M A, Farooq M U, Shafiq I, Ali A. 2019b. Shade effect on carbohydrates dynamics and stem strength of soybean genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 162, 375–384.
Iqbal N, Hussain S, Zhang X W, Yang C Q, Raza M, Deng J C, Ahmad S, Ashgar M, Zhang J, Yang W. 2018. Imbalance water deficit improves the seed yield and quality of soybean. Agronomy, 8, 168.
Kang S, Zhang J. 2004. Controlled alternate partial root-zone irrigation: its physiological consequences and impact on water use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2437–2446.
Kohnen M V, Schmid-Siegert E, Trevisan M, Petrolati L A, Sénéchal F, Müller-Moulé P, Maloof J, Xenarios I, Fankhauser C. 2016. Neighbor detection induces organ-specific transcriptomes revealing patterns underlying hypocotyl-specific growth. The Plant Cell, 28, 2889–2904.
Krasensky J, Jonak C. 2012. Drought salt and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 1593–1608.
Kurepin L V, Emery R N, Pharis R P, Reid D M. 2007a. Uncoupling light quality from light irradiance effects in Helianthus annuus shoots: Putative roles for plant hormones in leaf and internode growth. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 2145–2157.
Kurepin L V, Shah S, Reid D M. 2007b. Light quality regulation of endogenous levels of auxin abscisic acid and ethylene production in petioles and leaves of wild type and ACC deaminase transgenic Brassica napus seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation, 52, 53–60.
Le T N, McQueen-Mason S. 2006. Desiccation-tolerant plants in dry environments life in extreme environments. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 6, 269–279.
Leprince O, Deltour R, Thorpe P C, Atherton N M, Hendry G A. 1990. The role of free radicals and radical processing systems in loss of desiccation tolerance in germinating maize (Zea mays L.). New Phytologist, 116, 573–580.
Li X, Kakubari Y. 2001. Photosynthesis and chlorophylla fluorescence of two poplars under water stress. Journal of Forest Research, 6, 211–215.
Li Y, Jiang H K, Sun X, Muhammad A A, Liu J, Liu W, Shu K, Shang J, Yang F, Wu X. 2018. Quantitative proteomic analyses identified multiple sugar metabolic proteins in soybean under shade stress. The Journal of Biochemistry, 165, 277–288.
Li Y, Zhao H, Duan B, Korpelainen H, Li C. 2011. Effect of drought and ABA on growth photosynthesis and antioxidant system of Cotinus coggygria seedlings under two different light conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71, 107–113.
Masoumi H, Masoumi M, Darvish F, Daneshian J, Nourmohammadi G, Habibi D. 2010. Change in several antioxidant enzymes activity and seed yield by water deficit stress in soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38, 86–94.
Michel B E, Kaufmann M R. 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiology, 51, 914–916.
Mohammadkhani N, Heidari R. 2008. Drought-induced accumulation of soluble sugars and proline in two maize varieties. World Applied Science Journal, 3, 448–453.
Naderikharaji R, Pakniyat H, Biabani A. 2008. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic rate of four rapeseed (Brassica napus) cultivars. Journal of Application Science, 8, 4460–4463.
Ohashi Y, Nakayama N, Saneoka H, Fujita K. 2006. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic gas exchange chlorophyll fluorescence and stem diameter of soybean plants. Biologia Plantarum, 50, 138–141.
Olechowicz J, Chomontowski C, Olechowicz P, Pietkiewicz S, Jajoo A, Kalaji M. 2018. Impact of intraspecific competition on photosynthetic apparatus efficiency in potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants. Photosynthetica, 56, 971–975.
Pan Y, Lu Z, Lu J, Li X, Cong R, Ren T. 2017. Effects of low sink demand on leaf photosynthesis under potassium deficiency. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 113, 110–121.
Piper F I, Corcuera L J, Alberdi M, Lusk C. 2007. Differential photosynthetic and survival responses to soil drought in two evergreen Nothofagus species. Annals of Forest Science, 64, 447–452.
Prado F E, Boero C, Gallardo M, Gonzalez J A. 2000. Effect of NaCl on germination growth and soluble sugar content in Chenopodium quinoa Willd. seeds. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 41, 1.
Prider J, Facelli J. 2004. Interactive effects of drought and shade on three arid zone chenopod shrubs with contrasting distributions in relation to tree canopies. Functional Ecology, 18, 67–76.
Rahbarian R, Khavari-Nejad R, Ganjeali A, Bagheri A, Najafi F. 2011. Drought stress effects on photosynthesis chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations in tolerant and susceptible chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 53, 47–56.
Shi H, Chen L, Ye T, Liu X, Ding K, Chan Z. 2014a. Modulation of auxin content in Arabidopsis confers improved drought stress resistance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 82, 209–217.
Singh M, Kumar J, Singh S, Singh V P, Prasad S M. 2015. Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: A review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 14, 407–426.
Sun X, Yuan S, Lin H H. 2006. Salicylic acid decreases the levels of dehydrin-like proteins in Tibetan Hulless barley leaves under water stress. Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung C, 61, 245–250.
Suzuki N, Koussevitzky S, Mittler R, Miller G. 2012. ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell & Environment, 35, 259–270.
Turner N C. 1981. Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil, 58, 339–366.
Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. 2000. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Science, 151, 59–66.
Wang W, Wang C, Pan D, Zhang Y, Luo B, Ji J. 2018. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence images of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11, 196–201.
Wang Y, Wang G, Zheng Y, Zheng Y, Li S, Shao J, Luo J, Hu J, Xu S. 2019. Polyamines are involved in chilling tolerance in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation, 89, 153–166.
de Wit M, Galvao V C, Fankhauser C. 2016. Light-mediated hormonal regulation of plant growth and development. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 67, 513–537.
Xing X H, Xu Z J, QI Y J, Wang X J, Sun D L, Bian N F, Wang X. 2018. Effect of exogenous α-naphthaleneacetic acid on carbon metabolism of soybean under drought stress at flowering stage. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 1215–1224. (in Chinese)
Xu C. 2013. Effects of drought stress on leaf photosynthesis and some physiological traits in different soybean cultivars. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 35, 674–679. (in Chinese)
Yang Y, Han C, Liu Q, Lin B, Wang J. 2008. Effect of drought and low light on growth and enzymatic antioxidant system of Picea asperata seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 30, 433–440.
|
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
