Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2018, Vol. 17 Issue (03): 603-612    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61754-4
Horticulture Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Physiological response of four wolfberry (Lycium Linn.) species under drought stress
ZHAO Jian-hua1, LI Hao-xia2, ZHANG Cun-zhi3, AN Wei1, YIN Yue1, WANG Ya-jun1, CAO You-long1  
1 National Wolfberry Engineering Research Center, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, P.R.China
2 Desertification Control Research Institute, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, P.R.China
3 Ningxia Professional Technology College, Yinchuan 750021, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  We studied gas-exchange, chlorophyll pigments, lipid peroxidation, antioxidant enzymes, and biomass partitioning responses in seedlings of four wolfberry species (Lycium chinense Mill. var. potaninii (Pojark.) A. M. Lu, Lycium chinense Mill., Lycium barbarum L., and Lycium yunnanense Kuang & A. M. Lu) under four water supply regimes.  In all four species, drought affected seedlings in terms of chlorophyll content, net photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E), and lipid peroxidation.  Drought also increased some antioxidant enzyme activities, such as peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX).  Significant changes in dry biomass partitioning also occurred in response to water stress.  In particular, dry biomass of leaves and fruits decreased significantly.  L. chinense Mill. and L. barbarum L. possessed greater drought tolerance and exhibited superior antioxidant processing ability and other related physiological traits compared to the other two species. L. chinense Mill. was the most tolerant to all levels of drought.  In contrast, L. yunnanense Kuang & A. M. Lu was more affected by water supply and had the lowest resistance to drought stress.  These findings would provide some important information regarding genetic resources for future forest tree improvement in relation to drought tolerance. 
Keywords:  drought        Lycium Linn.        chlorophyll fluorescence        osmotic adjustment        antioxidant respond        dry matter allocation  
Received: 04 March 2017   Accepted: 01 March 2018
Fund: 

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31360191, 31660220), the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China (NZ16121), and the Self-option and Foundation of Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, China (YES-16-0402, NKYZ-16-0402).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence ZHAO Jian-hua, E-mail: zhaojianhua0943@163.com   

Cite this article: 

ZHAO Jian-hua, LI Hao-xia, ZHANG Cun-zhi, AN Wei, YIN Yue, WANG Ya-jun, CAO You-long. 2018. Physiological response of four wolfberry (Lycium Linn.) species under drought stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 17(03): 603-612.

Anjum S A, Xie X, Wang L C, Saleem M F, Man C, Lei W. 2011. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6, 2026–2032.

Arnon D I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24, 1–15.

Aroca R, Irigoyen J J, Sánchez-díaz M. 2003. Drought enhances maize chilling tolerance. II. Photosynthetic traits and protective mechanisms against oxidative stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 117, 540–549.

Ashraf M, Iram A. 2005. Drought stress induced changes in some organic substances in nodules and other plant parts of two potential legumes differing in salt tolerance. Flora, 200, 535–546.

Ávila C, Guardiola J L, Nebauer S G. 2012. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus to a flowering-inductive period by water stress in citrus. Trees, 26, 833–840.

Babita M, Maheswari M, Rao L M, Shanker A K, Rao D G. 2010. Osmotic adjustment, drought tolerance and yield in castor (Ricinus communis  L.) hybrids. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 69, 243–249.

Bates L S, Waldren R P, Teare I D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant & Soil, 39, 205–207.

Bhatt D, Negi M, Sharma P, Saxena S C, Dobriyal A K, Arora S. 2011. Responses to drought induced oxidative stress in five finger millet varieties differing in their geographical distribution. Physiology & Molecular Biology of Plants, 17, 347–353.

Bilger W, Björkman O. 1990. Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photo-protection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. Photosynthesis Research, 25, 173–185.

Bruna D S, Bruno M R, Laurício E, Mauro G S. 2010. Ecophysiology parameters of four Brazilian Atlantic Forest species under shade and drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plant, 32, 729–737.

Chang R C, So K F. 2008. Use of anti-aging herbal medicine, Lycium barbarum, against aging-associated diseases. What do we know so far? Cellular & Molecular Neurobiology, 28, 643–652.

Chaves M M. 1991. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 42, 1–16.

Chaves M M, Oliveira M M. 2005. Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: Prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2365–2384.

Chen J Y, Zhang Z T, Li Y N. 2004. Effects of NaCl stress on betaine, chloroplast pigment of leaves chlorophyll fluorescence and of Lycium barbarum L. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 22, 109–114. (in Chinese)

Chen M T, Zhao Z. 2011. Effects of drought on root characteristics and mass allocation in each part of seedlings of four tree species. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 33, 16–22. (in Chinese)

CCP (Committee of Chinese Pharmacopoeia). 2010. Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Committee of Chinese Pharmacopoeia, Beijing. (in Chinese)

Deng B, Du W, Liu C, Sun W, Tian S, Dong H. 2012. Antioxidant response to drought, cold and nutrient stress in two ploidy levels of tobacco plants: Low resource requirement confers polytolerance in polyploids? Plant Growth Regulation, 66, 37–47.

Diego N D, Pérezalfocea F, Cantero E, Lacuesta M, Moncaleán P. 2012. Physiological response to drought in radiata pine: Phytohormone implication at leaf level. Tree Physiology, 32, 435–449.

Gao D, Gao Q, Xu H Y, Ma F, Zhao C M, Liu J Q. 2009. Physiological responses to gradual drought stress in the diploid hybrid Pinus densata and its two parental species. Trees, 23, 717–728.

Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R. 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, 990, 87–92.

Hodges D M, DeLong J M, Forney C F, Prange R K. 1999. Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta, 207, 604–611.

Horváth E, Pál M, Szalai G, Páldi E, Janda T. 2007. Exogenous 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and salicylic acid modulate the effect of short term drought and freezing stress on wheat plants. Biologia Plantarum, 51, 480–487.

Inskeep W P, Bloom P R. 1985. Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N,N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiology, 77, 483–485.

Li H C, Qiu Z J. 2003. A review of studies of drought resistance in tree species and drought resistant forestation technology. World Forestry Research, 16, 17–22.

Michel H, Florence T. 1999. Loss of chlorophyll with limited reduction of photosynthesis as an adaptive response of Syrian barley landraces to high-light and heat stress. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 26, 569–578.

Reddy A R, Chaitanya K V, Vivekanandan M. 2004. Drought-induced response of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161, 1189–1202.

Ribas-Carbo M, Taylor N L, Giles L, Busquets S, Finnegan P M, Day D A, Lambers H, Medrano H, Berry J A, Flexas J. 2005. Effects of water stress on respiration in soybean leaves. Plant Physiology, 139, 466–473.

Schreiber U, Schliwa U, Bilger W. 1986. Continuous recording of pho-tochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosynthesis Research, 10, 51–62.

Toorchi M, Shashidhar H E, Hittalmani S, Gireesha T M. 2002. Rice root morphology under contrasting moisture regimes and contribution of molecular marker heterozygosity. Euphytica, 126, 251–257.

Wallin G, Karlsson P E, Selldn G, Ottosson S, Medin E L, Pleijel H, Skarby L. 2002. Impact of four years exposure to different levels of ozone, phosphorus and drought on chlorophyll, mineral nutrients, and stem volume of Noway spruce, Picea abies. Physiologia Plantarum, 11, 192–206.

Wang Y, Ma F, Li M, Liang D, Zou J. 2011. Physiological responses of kiwifruit plants to exogenous ABA under drought conditions. Plant Growth Regulation, 64, 63–74.

Xiao Y A. 2001. The physiology responses and adjective adaptability of water stress on Cleme spinosa L. seedlings. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 19, 524–528. (in Chinese)

Xie C, Xu L Z, Li X M, Zhao B H, Yang S L. 2001. Studies on chemical constituents in fruit of Lycium barbarum L. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 26, 323–324. (in Chinese)

Xu Y H, Xu Y, An W T. 2000. The progress in studies on anti-tumor pharmacodynamics of Lycium barbarum Medicine and Materia Medica Research, 11, 946–947. (in Chinese)

Zobel R W. 2003. Sensitivity analysis of computer based diameter measurement from digital images. Crop Science, 43, 583–591.
 
[1] ZHANG Li, CHU Qing-quan, JIANG Yu-lin, CHEN Fu, LEI Yong-deng. Impacts of climate change on drought risk of winter wheat in the North China Plain[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(10): 2601-2612.
[2] Hamid NAWAZ, Nazim HUSSAIN, Niaz AHMED, Haseeb-ur-REHMAN, Javaiz ALAM. Efficiency of seed bio-priming technique for healthy mungbean productivity under terminal drought stress[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(1): 87-99.
[3] LI Peng-cheng, YANG Xiao-yi, WANG Hou-miao, PAN Ting, YANG Ji-yuan, WANG Yun-yun, XU Yang, YANG Ze-feng, XU Chen-wu. Metabolic responses to combined water deficit and salt stress in maize primary roots[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(1): 109-119.
[4] JIA Teng-jiao, LI Jing-jing, WANG Li-feng, CAO Yan-yong, MA Juan, WANG Hao, ZHANG Deng-feng, LI Hui-yong. Evaluation of drought tolerance in ZmVPP1-overexpressing transgenic inbred maize lines and their hybrids[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(9): 2177-2187.
[5] ZHAO Fu-nian, ZHOU Shuang-xi, WANG Run-yuan, ZHANG Kai, WANG He-ling, YU Qiang. Quantifying key model parameters for wheat leaf gas exchange under different environmental conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(9): 2188-2205.
[6] LIU Rui-xuan, WU Fang-kun, YI Xin, LIN Yu, WANG Zhi-qiang, LIU Shi-hang, DENG Mei, MA Jian, WEI Yu-ming, ZHENG You-liang, LIU Ya-xi. Quantitative trait loci analysis for root traits in synthetic hexaploid wheat under drought stress conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(8): 1947-1960.
[7] HONG Ye, ZHANG Guo-ping. The influence of drought stress on malt quality traits of the wild and cultivated barleys[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(8): 2009-2015.
[8] ZHANG Shu-juan, LI Yu-lian, SONG Guo-qi, GAO Jie, ZHANG Rong-zhi, LI Wei, CHEN Ming-li, LI Gen-ying. Heterologous expression of the ThIPK2 gene enhances drought resistance of common wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(4): 941-952.
[9] WANG Qian, LIU Chang-hai, HUANG Dong, DONG Qing-long, LI Peng-min, Steve van NOCKER, MA Feng-wang . Physiological evaluation of nitrogen use efficiency of different apple cultivars under various nitrogen and water supply conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(3): 709-720.
[10] HAO Lu-yang, LIU Xu-yang, ZHANG Xiao-jing, SUN Bao-cheng, LIU Cheng, ZHANG Deng-feng, TANG Huai-jun, LI Chun-hui, LI Yong-xiang, SHI Yun-su, XIE Xiao-qing, SONG Yan-chun, WANG Tian-yu, LI Yu .
Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of drought related genes in roots of two maize inbred lines with contrasting drought tolerance by RNA sequencing
[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(2): 449-464.
[11] ZOU Jie, HU Wei, LI Yu-xia, HE Jia-qi, ZHU Hong-hai, ZHOU Zhi-guo .
Screening of drought resistance indices and evaluation of drought resistance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(2): 495-508.
[12] WANG Zi-yu, bAO Yu-fang, PEI Tong, WU Tai-ru, DU Xu, HE Meng-xi, WANG Yue, LIU Qi-feng, YANG Huan-huan, JIANG Jing-bin, ZHANG He, LI Jing-fu, ZHAO Ting-ting, XU Xiang-yang. Silencing the SLB3 transcription factor gene decreases drought stress tolerance in tomato[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(11): 2699-2708.
[13] Seth TOLLEY, Yang Yang, Mohsen MOHAMMADI. High-throughput phenotyping identifies plant growth differences under well-watered and drought treatments[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(10): 2429-2438.
[14] LI Xiao-lan, Lü Xiang, WANG Xiao-hong, PENG Qin, ZHANG Ming-sheng, REN Ming-jian . Biotic and abiotic stress-responsive genes are stimulated to resist drought stress in purple wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(1): 33-50.
[15] ZHANG Deng-feng, ZENG Ting-ru, LIU Xu-yang, GAO Chen-xi, LI Yong-xiang, LI Chun-hui, SONG Yan-chun, SHI Yun-su, WANG Tian-yu, LI Yu. Transcriptomic profiling of sorghum leaves and roots responsive to drought stress at the seedling stage[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(9): 1980-1995.
No Suggested Reading articles found!