Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2017, Vol. 16 Issue (04): 858-866    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61493-4
Physiology·Biochemistry·Cultivation·Tillage Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Simple nonlinear model for the relationship between maize yield and cumulative water amount
LIU Cheng1, 2, SUN Bao-cheng2, TANG Huai-jun2, WANG Tian-yu3, LI Yu3, ZHANG Deng-feng3, XIE Xiao-qing2, SHI Yun-su3, SONG Yan-chun3, YANG Xiao-hong1, LI Jian-sheng1

1 Maize Research Center, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.China

2 Institute of Grain Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, P.R.China

3 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Both the additive and multiplicative models of crop yield and water supply are polynomial equations, and the number of parameters increases linearly when the growing period is specified.  However, interactions among multiple parameters occasionally lead to unreasonable estimations of certain parameters, which were water sensitivity coefficients but with negative value.  Additionally, evapotranspiration must be measured as a model input.  To facilitate the application of these models and overcome the aforementioned shortcomings, a simple model with only three parameters was derived in this paper based on certain general quantitative relations of crop yield (Y) and water supply (W).  The new model, Y/YmWk/(Wk+whk), fits an S or a saturated curve of crop yield with the cumulative amount of water.  Three parameters are related to biological factors: the yield potential (Ym), the water requirement to achieve half of the yield potential (half-yield water requirement, wh), and the water sensitivity coefficient (k).  The model was validated with data from 24 maize lines obtained in the present study and 17 maize hybrids published by other authors.  The results showed that the model was well fit to the data, and the normal root of the mean square error (NRMSE) values were 2.8 to 17.8% (average 7.2%) for the 24 maize lines and 2.7 to 12.7% (average 7.4%) for the 17 maize varieties.  According to the present model, the maize water-sensitive stages in descending order were pollen shedding and silking, tasselling, jointing, initial grain ?lling, germination, middle grain ?lling, late grain ?lling, and end of grain ?lling.  This sequence was consistent with actual observations in the maize field.  The present model may be easily used to analyse the water use efficiency and drought tolerance of maize at specific stages.
Keywords:  yield      water,      model      maize      water sensitivity      drought tolerance  
Received: 03 June 2016   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was supported by grants provided by the National Sci-Tech Key Program of Development of Transgenic Animals and Plants, Ministry of Science and Technology, China (2014ZX08003-004).

Corresponding Authors:  LI Jian-sheng, Tel: +86-10-62732422, E-mail: lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn; WANG Tian-yu, Tel: +86-10-62186632, E-mail: wangtianyu@caas.cn; LI Yu, Tel: +86-10-62186632, E-mail: liyu03@caas.cn   
About author:  LIU Cheng, Tel: +86-991-4507086, E-mail: liuchengxj@126.com

Cite this article: 

LIU Cheng SUN Bao-cheng, TANG Huai-jun, WANG Tian-yu LI Yu, ZHANG Deng-feng, XIE Xiao-qing, SHI Yun-su, SONG Yan-chun, YANG Xiao-hong, LI Jian-sheng . 2017. Simple nonlinear model for the relationship between maize yield and cumulative water amount. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(04): 858-866.

Barrett J W. 1980. Crop production functions and the allocation and use of irrigation water. Agricultural Water Management, 3, 53–66.
Blank H. 1975. Optimal irrigation decisions with limited water. Ph D thesis. Colorado State University, Collins, CO.
Briggs L J. 1914. Relative water requirements of plants. Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 1–63.
Chen Y. 1998. Study on crop water model considering the hysteresis effect of water shortage. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 4, 70–74. (in Chinese)
Claassen M M, Shaw R H. 1970. Water deficit effects on corn. I. Grain components. Agronomy Journal, 62, 652–655.
Cong Z, Zhou Z W, Lei Z D. 2002. New definition and solution of water sensitivity index of Jensen model. Advances in Water Science, 13, 730–735. (in Chinese)
Fan X W. 2011. Study on drought resistance and harvest index of different maize genotypes under different water gradient. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 21, 57–58.
Guo Z L. 1994. Optimization model of nonlinear water saving and high yield. Advance in Water Science, 5, 58–63. (in Chinese)
Hanks R J. 1975. Model for predicting plant yield as influenced by water use. Agronomy Journal, 66, 660–655.
Jamieson P D, Porter J R, Wilson D R. 1991. A test of the computer simulation model ARC-WHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research, 27, 337–350.
Jensen M E. 1973. Consumptive Use of Water and Irrigation Water Requirements. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
Jiao X Y, Lei Z D, Peng S Z. 2005. Robust regression method for the establishment of crop water production function. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering. China. pp. 97–100. (in Chinese)
Jiao X Y, Lei Z D, Yang S X. 2002. Development of water science using BP neural network to describe crop water model. Journal of Hebei Engineering and Technical College, 1, 2–5. (in Chinese)
Jiao X Y, Peng S Z. 2004. The reason and solution of negative value of sensitivity index of Jensen model. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 35, 439–442. (in Chinese)
Li H C, Shen R K. 1997. A preliminary study on the Feddes model of crop water dynamic yield model. Irrigation and Drainage, 16, 1–5. (in Chinese)
Li J. 1997. Advances in the development and application of crop growth simulation models. Journal of Northwest Agricultural University, 25, 102–107. (in Chinese)
Li Y H. 1999. Theory and Technology of Water Saving Irrigation. Wuhan Water Conservancy and Electric Power University Press, China. pp. 84–851. (in Chinese)
Liu T M, Xie G S. 2010. Agricultural System Analysis and Simulation. Science Press, China. (in Chinese)
Mehdi M, Sepaskhah A R, Zand-Parsa S. 2014. Estimation of yield and dry matter of winter wheat using logistic model under different irrigation water regimes and nitrogen application rates. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60, 1661–1676.
Minhas B S, Parikh K S, Srinivasan T N. 1974. Towards the structure of a production function for wheat yields with dated in puts of irrigation water. Water Resources Research, 10, 383–393.
Morgan T H, Biere A W, Kanemasu E T. 1980. A dynamic model of corn yield response to water. Water Resources Research, 16, 59–64.
Paredes J P, de Melo-Abreu J P, Alves I, Pereira L S. 2014. Assessing the performance of the FAO AquaCrop model to estimate maize yields and water use under full and deficit irrigation with focus on model parameterization. Agricultural Water Management, 44, 81–97.
Peng S Z, Bian L M, Zhu C L. 2000. Research and development of crop water production function. Development of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Science and Technology, 20, 17–20. (in Chinese)
Rajput G S, Singh J. 1986. Water production functions for wheat under different environmental conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 11, 319–332.
Rao N H, Sarma P B S, Chander S. 1988. A simple dated production function for use in irrigated agriculture. Agricultural Water Management, 13, 25–32.
Robins J S, Domingo C E. 1953. Some effect of severe soil moisture deficits at specific growth stages in corn. Agronomy Journal, 45, 618–621.
Shabani A, Sepaskhah A R, Kamgar-Haghighi A A. 2015. A model to predict the dry matter and yield of rapeseed under salinity and deficit irrigation. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 61, 525–542.
Shang S H, Mao X M, Lei Z D. 2009. Dynamic Simulation Model of Soil Moisture and Its Application. Science Press, China. (in Chinese)
Shen X Z, Cui Y L, Shen H Z. 2001a. Neural network method for crop water shortage sensitivity analysis. China Rural Water Conservancy and Hydropower, 5, 12–15. (in Chinese)
Shen X Z, Zhu L Z, Cui Y L, Shen H Z. 2001b. Modified Morgan model for dynamic production functions of crop water and fertilizer. Irrigation and Drainage, 20, 17–20. (in Chinese)
Singh P N, Joshi B P, Singh G. 1987. Water use and yield response of wheat to irrigation and nitrogen on an alluvial soil in North India. Agricultural Water Management, 12, 323–329.
Stewart J I, Hagan R M. 1969. Functions to predict effects of crop, water deficits. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, 95, 91–104.
Stewart J I, Hagan R M, Pruitt W O. 1976. Production Functions and Predicted Irrigation Programmers for Principal Crops as Required for Water Resources Planning and Increased Water Use Efficiency. Final Report U.S. Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. p. 80.
Taylor H M, Jordan W R, Sinclair T R. 1983. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wl. pp. 393–411.
Wang H Z, Zhang L, Dawes W R, Liu C. 2001. Improving water use efficiency of irrigated crops in the North China Plain — measurements and modeling. Agricultural Water Management, 48, 151–167. (in Chinese)
Wang Z. 1988. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. China Agriculture Press, China. pp. 41–43. (in Chinese)
Wei Y L. 2004. Modeling of water production functions of winter wheat. MSc thesis, Tsinghua University, China. (in Chinese)
Wei Z M, Chen Y X, Shi H B. 2002. Preliminary study on crop water model of spring wheat with BP neural network. Irrigation and Drainage, 21, 12–16. (in Chinese)
Westgate M E. 1994. Seed formation in maize during drought. In: Boote K J, ed., Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 361–364.
Willmott C J, Rowe C M, MIntz Y. 1985. Climatology of terrestrial seasonal water cycle. International Journal of Climatology, 5, 589–606.
de Wit C T. 1958. Transpiration and Crop Yields. Institute of Biological and Chemical Researchon on Field Crops and Herbage, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 64.
Xia H, Yang L H. 2003, Research progress on crop water production function. Journal of Hebei Engineering and Technical College, 2, 5–8. (in Chinese)
Zhang H J. 2009. Water yield model and its application in several field crops. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 17, 997–1001. (in Chinese)
[1] Xianglin Zhang, Jie Xue, Songchao Chen, Zhiqing Zhuo, Zheng Wang, Xueyao Chen, Yi Xiao, Zhou Shi. Improving model performance in mapping cropland soil organic matter using time-series remote sensing data[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2820-2841.
[2] Yang Cao, Peihua Du, Yuwei Shang, Jiahao Ji, Leiqing Tan, Xue Zhang, Jizhong Xu, Bowen Liang. Melatonin and dopamine alleviate waterlogging stress in apples by recruiting beneficial endophytes to enhance physiological resilience[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2270-2291.
[3] Jiang Liu, Wenyu Yang. Soybean maize strip intercropping: A solution for maintaining food security in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2503-2506.
[4] Hui Fang, Xiuyi Fu, Hanqiu Ge, Mengxue Jia, Jie Ji, Yizhou Zhao, Zijian Qu, Ziqian Cui, Aixia Zhang, Yuandong Wang, Ping Li, Baohua Wang. Genetic analysis and candidate gene identification of salt tolerancerelated traits in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2196-2210.
[5] Hui Chen, Hongxing Chen, Song Zhang, Shengxi Chen, Fulang Cen, Quanzhi Zhao, Xiaoyun Huang, Tengbing He, Zhenran Gao. Comparison of CWSI and Ts-Ta-VIs in moisture monitoring of dryland crops (sorghum and maize) based on UAV remote sensing[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2458-2475.
[6] Shuang Pei, Zexu Wu, Ziqiao Ji, Zheng Liu, Zicheng Zhu, Feishi Luan, Shi Liu. Quantitative trait loci identification reveals zinc finger protein CONSTANS-LIKE 4 as the key candidate gene of stigma color in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2292-2305.
[7] Peng Liu, Langlang Ma, Siyi Jian, Yao He, Guangsheng Yuan, Fei Ge, Zhong Chen, Chaoying Zou, Guangtang Pan, Thomas Lübberstedt, Yaou Shen. Population genomic analysis reveals key genetic variations and the driving force for embryonic callus induction capability in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2178-2195.
[8] Song Wan, Yongxin Lin, Hangwei Hu, Milin Deng, Jianbo Fan, Jizheng He. Excessive manure application stimulates nitrogen cycling but only weakly promotes crop yields in an acidic Ultisol: Results from a 20-year field experiment[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2434-2445.
[9] Hanzhu Gu, Xian Wang, Minhao Zhang, Wenjiang Jing, Hao Wu, Zhilin Xiao, Weiyang Zhang, Junfei Gu, Lijun Liu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianhua Zhang, Jianchang Yang, Hao Zhang.

The response of roots and the rhizosphere environment to integrative cultivation practices in paddy rice [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(6): 1879-1896.

[10] Jianjun Wang, Yanan Shao, Xin Yang, Chi Zhang, Yuan Guo, Zijin Liu, Mingxun Chen.

Heterogeneous expression of stearoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturase genes SAD1 and SAD2 from Linum usitatissimum enhances seed oleic acid accumulation and seedling cold and drought tolerance in Brassica napus [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(6): 1864-1878.

[11] Jiangkuan Cui, Haohao Ren, Bo Wang, Fujie Chang, Xuehai Zhang, Haoguang Meng, Shijun Jiang, Jihua Tang.

Hatching and development of maize cyst nematode Heterodera zeae infecting different plant hosts [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1593-1603.

[12] Qianwei Zhang, Yuanyi Mao, Zikun Zhao, Xin Hu, Ran Hu, Nengwen Yin, Xue Sun, Fujun Sun, Si Chen, Yuxiang Jiang, Liezhao Liu, Kun Lu, Jiana Li, Yu Pan.

A Golden2-like transcription factor, BnGLK1a, improves chloroplast development, photosynthesis, and seed weight in rapeseed [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1481-1493.

[13] Qilong Song, Jie Zhang, Fangfang Zhang, Yufang Shen, Shanchao Yue, Shiqing Li.

Optimized nitrogen application for maximizing yield and minimizing nitrogen loss in film mulching spring maize production on the Loess Plateau, China [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1671-1684.

[14] Jie Song, Dongsheng Yu, Siwei Wang, Yanhe Zhao, Xin Wang, Lixia Ma, Jiangang Li. Mapping soil organic matter in cultivated land based on multi-year composite images on monthly time scales[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1393-1408.
[15] Xuan Li, Shaowen Wang, Yifan Chen, Danwen Zhang, Shanshan Yang, Jingwen Wang, Jiahua Zhang, Yun Bai, Sha Zhang.

Improved simulation of winter wheat yield in North China Plain by using PRYM-Wheat integrated dry matter distribution coefficient [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1381-1392.

No Suggested Reading articles found!