Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2017, Vol. 16 Issue (04): 858-866    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61493-4
Physiology·Biochemistry·Cultivation·Tillage Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Simple nonlinear model for the relationship between maize yield and cumulative water amount
LIU Cheng1, 2, SUN Bao-cheng2, TANG Huai-jun2, WANG Tian-yu3, LI Yu3, ZHANG Deng-feng3, XIE Xiao-qing2, SHI Yun-su3, SONG Yan-chun3, YANG Xiao-hong1, LI Jian-sheng1

1 Maize Research Center, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.China

2 Institute of Grain Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, P.R.China

3 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

 

 

 

 

 

 

Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Both the additive and multiplicative models of crop yield and water supply are polynomial equations, and the number of parameters increases linearly when the growing period is specified.  However, interactions among multiple parameters occasionally lead to unreasonable estimations of certain parameters, which were water sensitivity coefficients but with negative value.  Additionally, evapotranspiration must be measured as a model input.  To facilitate the application of these models and overcome the aforementioned shortcomings, a simple model with only three parameters was derived in this paper based on certain general quantitative relations of crop yield (Y) and water supply (W).  The new model, Y/YmWk/(Wk+whk), fits an S or a saturated curve of crop yield with the cumulative amount of water.  Three parameters are related to biological factors: the yield potential (Ym), the water requirement to achieve half of the yield potential (half-yield water requirement, wh), and the water sensitivity coefficient (k).  The model was validated with data from 24 maize lines obtained in the present study and 17 maize hybrids published by other authors.  The results showed that the model was well fit to the data, and the normal root of the mean square error (NRMSE) values were 2.8 to 17.8% (average 7.2%) for the 24 maize lines and 2.7 to 12.7% (average 7.4%) for the 17 maize varieties.  According to the present model, the maize water-sensitive stages in descending order were pollen shedding and silking, tasselling, jointing, initial grain ?lling, germination, middle grain ?lling, late grain ?lling, and end of grain ?lling.  This sequence was consistent with actual observations in the maize field.  The present model may be easily used to analyse the water use efficiency and drought tolerance of maize at specific stages.
Keywords:  yield      water,      model      maize      water sensitivity      drought tolerance  
Received: 03 June 2016   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was supported by grants provided by the National Sci-Tech Key Program of Development of Transgenic Animals and Plants, Ministry of Science and Technology, China (2014ZX08003-004).

Corresponding Authors:  LI Jian-sheng, Tel: +86-10-62732422, E-mail: lijiansheng@cau.edu.cn; WANG Tian-yu, Tel: +86-10-62186632, E-mail: wangtianyu@caas.cn; LI Yu, Tel: +86-10-62186632, E-mail: liyu03@caas.cn   
About author:  LIU Cheng, Tel: +86-991-4507086, E-mail: liuchengxj@126.com

Cite this article: 

LIU Cheng SUN Bao-cheng, TANG Huai-jun, WANG Tian-yu LI Yu, ZHANG Deng-feng, XIE Xiao-qing, SHI Yun-su, SONG Yan-chun, YANG Xiao-hong, LI Jian-sheng . 2017. Simple nonlinear model for the relationship between maize yield and cumulative water amount. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(04): 858-866.

Barrett J W. 1980. Crop production functions and the allocation and use of irrigation water. Agricultural Water Management, 3, 53–66.
Blank H. 1975. Optimal irrigation decisions with limited water. Ph D thesis. Colorado State University, Collins, CO.
Briggs L J. 1914. Relative water requirements of plants. Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 1–63.
Chen Y. 1998. Study on crop water model considering the hysteresis effect of water shortage. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 4, 70–74. (in Chinese)
Claassen M M, Shaw R H. 1970. Water deficit effects on corn. I. Grain components. Agronomy Journal, 62, 652–655.
Cong Z, Zhou Z W, Lei Z D. 2002. New definition and solution of water sensitivity index of Jensen model. Advances in Water Science, 13, 730–735. (in Chinese)
Fan X W. 2011. Study on drought resistance and harvest index of different maize genotypes under different water gradient. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 21, 57–58.
Guo Z L. 1994. Optimization model of nonlinear water saving and high yield. Advance in Water Science, 5, 58–63. (in Chinese)
Hanks R J. 1975. Model for predicting plant yield as influenced by water use. Agronomy Journal, 66, 660–655.
Jamieson P D, Porter J R, Wilson D R. 1991. A test of the computer simulation model ARC-WHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research, 27, 337–350.
Jensen M E. 1973. Consumptive Use of Water and Irrigation Water Requirements. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
Jiao X Y, Lei Z D, Peng S Z. 2005. Robust regression method for the establishment of crop water production function. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Conference of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering. China. pp. 97–100. (in Chinese)
Jiao X Y, Lei Z D, Yang S X. 2002. Development of water science using BP neural network to describe crop water model. Journal of Hebei Engineering and Technical College, 1, 2–5. (in Chinese)
Jiao X Y, Peng S Z. 2004. The reason and solution of negative value of sensitivity index of Jensen model. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 35, 439–442. (in Chinese)
Li H C, Shen R K. 1997. A preliminary study on the Feddes model of crop water dynamic yield model. Irrigation and Drainage, 16, 1–5. (in Chinese)
Li J. 1997. Advances in the development and application of crop growth simulation models. Journal of Northwest Agricultural University, 25, 102–107. (in Chinese)
Li Y H. 1999. Theory and Technology of Water Saving Irrigation. Wuhan Water Conservancy and Electric Power University Press, China. pp. 84–851. (in Chinese)
Liu T M, Xie G S. 2010. Agricultural System Analysis and Simulation. Science Press, China. (in Chinese)
Mehdi M, Sepaskhah A R, Zand-Parsa S. 2014. Estimation of yield and dry matter of winter wheat using logistic model under different irrigation water regimes and nitrogen application rates. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60, 1661–1676.
Minhas B S, Parikh K S, Srinivasan T N. 1974. Towards the structure of a production function for wheat yields with dated in puts of irrigation water. Water Resources Research, 10, 383–393.
Morgan T H, Biere A W, Kanemasu E T. 1980. A dynamic model of corn yield response to water. Water Resources Research, 16, 59–64.
Paredes J P, de Melo-Abreu J P, Alves I, Pereira L S. 2014. Assessing the performance of the FAO AquaCrop model to estimate maize yields and water use under full and deficit irrigation with focus on model parameterization. Agricultural Water Management, 44, 81–97.
Peng S Z, Bian L M, Zhu C L. 2000. Research and development of crop water production function. Development of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Science and Technology, 20, 17–20. (in Chinese)
Rajput G S, Singh J. 1986. Water production functions for wheat under different environmental conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 11, 319–332.
Rao N H, Sarma P B S, Chander S. 1988. A simple dated production function for use in irrigated agriculture. Agricultural Water Management, 13, 25–32.
Robins J S, Domingo C E. 1953. Some effect of severe soil moisture deficits at specific growth stages in corn. Agronomy Journal, 45, 618–621.
Shabani A, Sepaskhah A R, Kamgar-Haghighi A A. 2015. A model to predict the dry matter and yield of rapeseed under salinity and deficit irrigation. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 61, 525–542.
Shang S H, Mao X M, Lei Z D. 2009. Dynamic Simulation Model of Soil Moisture and Its Application. Science Press, China. (in Chinese)
Shen X Z, Cui Y L, Shen H Z. 2001a. Neural network method for crop water shortage sensitivity analysis. China Rural Water Conservancy and Hydropower, 5, 12–15. (in Chinese)
Shen X Z, Zhu L Z, Cui Y L, Shen H Z. 2001b. Modified Morgan model for dynamic production functions of crop water and fertilizer. Irrigation and Drainage, 20, 17–20. (in Chinese)
Singh P N, Joshi B P, Singh G. 1987. Water use and yield response of wheat to irrigation and nitrogen on an alluvial soil in North India. Agricultural Water Management, 12, 323–329.
Stewart J I, Hagan R M. 1969. Functions to predict effects of crop, water deficits. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, 95, 91–104.
Stewart J I, Hagan R M, Pruitt W O. 1976. Production Functions and Predicted Irrigation Programmers for Principal Crops as Required for Water Resources Planning and Increased Water Use Efficiency. Final Report U.S. Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. p. 80.
Taylor H M, Jordan W R, Sinclair T R. 1983. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wl. pp. 393–411.
Wang H Z, Zhang L, Dawes W R, Liu C. 2001. Improving water use efficiency of irrigated crops in the North China Plain — measurements and modeling. Agricultural Water Management, 48, 151–167. (in Chinese)
Wang Z. 1988. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. China Agriculture Press, China. pp. 41–43. (in Chinese)
Wei Y L. 2004. Modeling of water production functions of winter wheat. MSc thesis, Tsinghua University, China. (in Chinese)
Wei Z M, Chen Y X, Shi H B. 2002. Preliminary study on crop water model of spring wheat with BP neural network. Irrigation and Drainage, 21, 12–16. (in Chinese)
Westgate M E. 1994. Seed formation in maize during drought. In: Boote K J, ed., Physiology and Determination of Crop Yield. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 361–364.
Willmott C J, Rowe C M, MIntz Y. 1985. Climatology of terrestrial seasonal water cycle. International Journal of Climatology, 5, 589–606.
de Wit C T. 1958. Transpiration and Crop Yields. Institute of Biological and Chemical Researchon on Field Crops and Herbage, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 64.
Xia H, Yang L H. 2003, Research progress on crop water production function. Journal of Hebei Engineering and Technical College, 2, 5–8. (in Chinese)
Zhang H J. 2009. Water yield model and its application in several field crops. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 17, 997–1001. (in Chinese)
[1] XIAN Xiao-qing, ZHAO Hao-xiang, GUO Jian-yang, ZHANG Gui-fen, LIU Hui, LIU Wan-xue, WAN Fang-hao. Estimation of the potential geographical distribution of a new potato pest (Schrankia costaestrigalis) in China under climate change[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2441-2455.
[2] YU Wen-jia, LI Hai-gang, Peteh M. NKEBIWE, YANG Xue-yun, GUO Da-yong, LI Cui-lan, ZHU Yi-yong, XIAO Jing-xiu, LI Guo-hua, SUN Zhi, Torsten MÜLLER, SHEN Jian-bo. Combining rhizosphere and soil-based P management decreased the P fertilizer demand of China by more than half based on LePA model simulations[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2509-2520.
[3] WANG Xing-long, ZHU Yu-peng, YAN Ye, HOU Jia-min, WANG Hai-jiang, LUO Ning, WEI Dan, MENG Qing-feng, WANG Pu. Irrigation mitigates the heat impacts on photosynthesis during grain filling in maize [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(8): 2370-2383.
[4] Tiago SILVA, Ying NIU, Tyler TOWLES, Sebe BROWN, Graham P. HEAD, Wade WALKER, Fangneng HUANG. Selection, effective dominance, and completeness of Cry1A.105/Cry2Ab2 dual-protein resistance in Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2151-2161.
[5] DING Yong-gang, ZHANG Xin-bo, MA Quan, LI Fu-jian, TAO Rong-rong, ZHU Min, Li Chun-yan, ZHU Xin-kai, GUO Wen-shan, DING Jin-feng. Tiller fertility is critical for improving grain yield, photosynthesis and nitrogen efficiency in wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2054-2066.
[6] LIU Dan, ZHAO De-hui, ZENG Jian-qi, Rabiu Sani SHAWAI, TONG Jing-yang, LI Ming, LI Fa-ji, ZHOU Shuo, HU Wen-li, XIA Xian-chun, TIAN Yu-bing, ZHU Qian, WANG Chun-ping, WANG De-sen, HE Zhong-hu, LIU Jin-dong, ZHANG Yong. Identification of genetic loci for grain yield‑related traits in the wheat population Zhongmai 578/Jimai 22[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 1985-1999.
[7] FAN Ting-lu, LI Shang-zhong, ZHAO Gang, WANG Shu-ying, ZHANG Jian-jun, WANG Lei, DANG Yi, CHENG Wan-li. Response of dryland crops to climate change and drought-resistant and water-suitable planting technology: A case of spring maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2067-2079.
[8] WEI Huan-he, GE Jia-lin, ZHANG Xu-bin, ZHU Wang, DENG Fei, REN Wan-jun, CHEN Ying-long, MENG Tian-yao, DAI Qi-gen. Decreased panicle N application alleviates the negative effects of shading on rice grain yield and grain quality[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2041-2053.
[9] GAO Peng, ZHANG Tuo, LEI Xing-yu, CUI Xin-wei, LU Yao-xiong, FAN Peng-fei, LONG Shi-ping, HUANG Jing, GAO Ju-sheng, ZHANG Zhen-hua, ZHANG Hui-min. Improvement of soil fertility and rice yield after long-term application of cow manure combined with inorganic fertilizers[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2221-2232.
[10] PAN Song, PENG De-liang, LI Ying-mei, CHEN Zhi-jie, ZHAI Ying-yan, LIU Chen, HONG Bo. Potential global distribution of the guava root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii under different climate change scenarios using MaxEnt ecological niche modeling[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2138-2150.
[11] WANG Peng, WANG Cheng-dong, WANG Xiao-lin, WU Yuan-hua, ZHANG Yan, SUN Yan-guo, SHI Yi, MI Guo-hua. Increasing nitrogen absorption and assimilation ability under mixed NO3 and NH4+ supply is a driver to promote growth of maize seedlings[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1896-1908.
[12] ZHANG Miao-miao, DANG Peng-fei, LI Yü-ze, QIN Xiao-liang, Kadambot-H. M. SIDDIQUE. Better tillage selection before ridge–furrow film mulching can facilitate root proliferation, increase nitrogen accumulation, translocation, grain yield of maize in a semiarid area[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1658-1670.
[13] XU Lei, ZHAO Tong-hua, Xing Xing, XU Guo-qing, XU Biao, ZHAO Ji-qiu.

Model fitting of the seasonal population dynamics of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, in the field [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1797-1808.

[14] SONG Chao-yu, ZHANG Fan, LI Jian-sheng, XIE Jin-yi, YANG Chen, ZHOU Hang, ZHANG Jun-xiong. Detection of maize tassels for UAV remote sensing image with an improved YOLOX Model[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1671-1683.
[15] LI Qian-chuan, XU Shi-wei, ZHUANG Jia-yu, LIU Jia-jia, ZHOU Yi, ZHANG Ze-xi. Ensemble learning prediction of soybean yields in China based on meteorological data[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6): 1909-1927.
No Suggested Reading articles found!