|
|
|
|
|
| Comparison of transcriptomes undergoing waterlogging at the seedling stage between tolerant and sensitive varieties of Brassica napus L. |
| ZOU Xi-ling, ZENG Liu, LU Guang-yuan, CHENG Yong, XU Jin-song, ZHANG Xue-kun |
| Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Ministry of Agriculture/Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430062, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 RNA sequencing of the sensitive GH01 variety of Brassica napus L. seedling roots under 12 h of waterlogging was compared with previously published data of the ZS9 tolerant variety to unravel genetic mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance beyond natural variation. A total of 2 977 genes with similar expression patterns and 17 genes with opposite expression patterns were identified in the transcription profiles of ZS9 and GH01. An additional 1 438 genes in ZS9 and 1 861 genes in GH01 showed strain specific regulation. Analysis of the overlapped genes between ZS9 and GH01 revealed that waterlogging tolerance is determined by ability to regulate genes with similar expression patterns. Moreover, differences in both gene expression profiles and abscisic acid (ABA) contents between the two varieties suggest that ABA may play some role in waterlogging tolerance. This study identifies a subset of candidate genes for further functional analysis.
Abstract RNA sequencing of the sensitive GH01 variety of Brassica napus L. seedling roots under 12 h of waterlogging was compared with previously published data of the ZS9 tolerant variety to unravel genetic mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance beyond natural variation. A total of 2 977 genes with similar expression patterns and 17 genes with opposite expression patterns were identified in the transcription profiles of ZS9 and GH01. An additional 1 438 genes in ZS9 and 1 861 genes in GH01 showed strain specific regulation. Analysis of the overlapped genes between ZS9 and GH01 revealed that waterlogging tolerance is determined by ability to regulate genes with similar expression patterns. Moreover, differences in both gene expression profiles and abscisic acid (ABA) contents between the two varieties suggest that ABA may play some role in waterlogging tolerance. This study identifies a subset of candidate genes for further functional analysis.
|
|
Received: 28 September 2014
Accepted:
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZHANG Xue-kun, E-mail: seedcq@263.net
E-mail: seedcq@263.net
|
Cite this article:
ZOU Xi-ling, ZENG Liu, LU Guang-yuan, CHENG Yong, XU Jin-song, ZHANG Xue-kun.
2015.
Comparison of transcriptomes undergoing waterlogging at the seedling stage between tolerant and sensitive varieties of Brassica napus L.. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(9): 1723-1734.
|
| Barnawal D, Bharti N, Maji D, Chanotiya C S, Kalra A. 2012.1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminasecontainingrhizobacteria protect Ocimum sanctum plantsduring waterlogging stress via reduced ethylene generationPlant Physiology Biochemistry, 58, 227-235Benschop J J, Jackson M B, Guhl K, Vreeburg R A, Croker S J,Peeters A J, Voesenek L A. 2005. Contrasting interactionsbetween ethylene and abscisic acid in Rumex speciesdiffering in submergence tolerance. The Plant Journal, 44,756-768Dennis E S, Dolferus R, Ellis M, Rahman M, Wu Y, Hoeren FU, Grover A, Ismond K P, Good A G, Peacock W J. 2000.Molecular strategies for improving waterlogging tolerancein plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 89-97Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J. 2004. Plant responses to hypoxia--is survival a balancing act? Trends in Plant Science, 9,449-456Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J. 2008. Submergence toleranceconferred by Sub1A is mediated by SLR1 and SLRL1 restriction of gibberellin responses in rice. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, 105, 16814-16819Geigenberger P. 2003. Response of plant metabolism to toolittle oxygen. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 6, 247-256Geisler-Lee J, Caldwell C, Gallie D R. 2010. Expression of theethylene biosynthetic machinery in maize roots is regulatedin response to hypoxia. Journal of Experimental Botany,61, 857-71Gibbs D J, Lee S C, Isa N M, Gramuglia S, Fukao T, BasselG W, Correia C S, Corbineau F, Theodoulou F L, Bailey-Serres J, Holdsworth M J. 2011. Homeostatic response tohypoxia is regulated by the N-end rule pathway in plants.Nature, 479, 415-417Gunawardena A H, Pearce D M, Jackson M B, Hawes C R,Evans D E. 2001. Characterisation of programmed celldeath during aerenchyma formation induced by ethyleneor hypoxia in roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Planta, 212,205-214Hattori Y, Nagai K, Furukawa S, Song X J, Kawano R,Sakakibara H, Wu J, Matsumoto T, Yoshimura A, KitanoH, Matsuoka M, Mori H, Ashikari M. 2009. The ethyleneresponse factors SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2 allow riceto adapt to deep water. Nature, 460, 1026-1030Hinz M, Wilson I W, Yang J, Buerstenbinder K, Llewellyn D,Dennis E S, Sauter M, Dolferus R. 2010. ArabidopsisRAP2.2, an ethylene response transcription factor thatis important for hypoxia survival. Plant Physiology, 153,757-772Hong J H, Seah S W, Xu J. 2013. The root of ABA action inenvironmental stress response. Plant Cell Report, 32,971-983Hong L Z, Li J, Schmidt-Kuntzel A, Warren W C, Barsh G S.2011. Digital gene expression for non-model organisms.Genome Research, 21, 1905-1915Horchani F, Aschi-Smiti S. 2011. Prolonged root hypoxia effectson ethylene biosynthesis and perception in tomato fruit.Plant Signal Behavior, 6, 1-4Hsu F C, Chou M Y, Chou S J, Li Y R, Peng H P, Shih M C.2013. Submergence confers immunity mediated by theWRKY22 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. The PlantCell, 25, 2699-2713Hsu F C, Chou M Y, Peng H P, Chou S J, Shih M C. 2011.Insights into hypoxic systemic responses based on analysesof transcriptional regulation in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE, 6,e28888.Ismond K P, Dolferus R, de Pauw M, Dennis E S, Good A G.2003. Enhanced low oxygen survival in Arabidopsis throughincreased metabolic flux in the fermentative pathway. PlantPhysiology, 132, 1292-1302Jackson M B, Colmer T D. 2005. Response and adaptation byplants to flooding stress. Annals of Botany, 96, 501-505Kende H, van der Knaap E, Cho H T. 1998. Deepwater rice,A model plant to study stem elongation. Plant Physiology,118, 1105-1110Kennedy R A, Rumpho M E, Fox T C. 1992. Anaerobicmetabolism in plants. Plant Physiology, 100, 1-6Licausi F, Kosmacz M, Weits D A, Giuntoli B, Giorgi F M,Voesenek LA, Perata P, van Dongen J T. 2011. Oxygensensing in plants is mediated by an N-end rule pathway forprotein destabilization. Nature, 479, 419-422Linsen S E, Cuppen E. 2012. Methods for small RNA preparationfor digital gene expression profiling by next-generationsequencing. Methods in Molecular Biology, 822, 205-217Negi S, Sukumar P, Liu X, Cohen J D, Muday G K. 2010.Genetic dissection of the role of ethylene in regulatingauxin-dependent lateral and adventitious root formation intomato. The Plant Journal, 61, 3-15Sachs M M, Freeling M, Okimoto R. 1980. The anaerobicproteins of maize. Cell, 20, 761-767Sachs M M, Subbaiah C C, Saab I N. 1996. Anaerobic geneexpression and flooding tolerance in maize. Journal ofExperimental Botany, 47, 1-15Saika H, Okamoto M, Miyoshi K, Kushiro T, Shinoda S,Jikumaru Y, Fujimoto M, Arikawa T, Takahashi H, AndoM, Arimura S, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Kamiya Y, TsutsumiN, Nambara E, Nakazono M. 2007. Ethylene promotessubmergence-induced expression of OsABA8ox1, agene that encodes ABA 8´-hydroxylase in rice. Plant CellPhysiology, 48, 287-298Sasidharan R, Mustroph A. 2011. Plant oxygen sensing ismediated by the N-end rule pathway, a milestone in plantanaerobiosis. The Plant Cell, 23, 4173-4183Umezawa T, Okamoto M, Kushiro T, Nambara E, Oono Y,Seki M, Kobayashi M, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Shinozaki K.2006. CYP707A3, a major ABA 8´-hydroxylase involvedin dehydration and rehydration response in Arabidopsisthaliana. The Plant Journal, 46, 171-182Vidoz M L, Loreti E, Mensuali A, Alpi A, Perata P. 2010.Hormonal interplay during adventitious root formation inflooded tomato plants. The Plant Journal, 63, 551-562Voesenek L A, Bailey-Serres J. 2013. Flooding tolerance, O2sensing and survival strategies. Current Opinion in PlantBiology, 16, 647-653Voesenek L A, Benschop J J, Bou J, Cox M C, Groeneveld H W,Millenaar F F, Vreeburg R A, Peeters A J. 2003. Interactionsbetween plant hormones regulate submergence-inducedshoot elongation in the flooding-tolerant dicot Rumexpalustris. Annals of Botany, 91, 205-211Voesenek L A C J, Colmer T D, Pierik R, Millenaar F F, PeetersA J M. 2006. How plants cope with complete submergence.New Phytologist, 170, 213-226Xu K, Xu X, Fukao T, Canlas P, Maghirang-Rodriguez R,Heuer S, Ismail A M, Bailey-Serres J, Ronald P C, MackillD J. 2006. Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like genethat confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature, 442,705-708Yang C Y. 2014. Ethylene and hydrogen peroxide are involvedin hypoxia signaling that modulates AtERF73/HRE1expression. Plant Signal Behavior, 9, 1-6Ye N, Jia L, Zhang J. 2012. ABA signal in rice under stressconditions. Rice, 5, 1. Zhang X K, Chen J, Chen L, Wang H Z, Li J N. 2008. Imbibitionbehavior and flooding tolerance of rapeseed seed (Brassicanapus L.) with different testa color. Genetic Resources andCrop Evolution, 55, 1175-1184Zhou W, Zhao D, Lin X. 1997. Effects of waterlogging onnitrogen accumulation and alleviation of waterloggingdamage by application of nitrogen fertilizer and mixtalol inwinter rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Plant GrowthRegulation, 16, 47-53Zhou W J, Lin XQ. 1995. Effects of waterlogging at differentgrowth stages on physiological characteristics and seedyield of winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Field CropsResearch, 44, 103-110Zou X L, Hu C W, Zeng L, Cheng Y, Xu M Y, Zhang X K. 2014a.A comparison of screening methods to identify waterloggingtolerance in the field in Brassica napus L. during plantontogeny. PLOS ONE, 9, e89731.Zou X L, Cong Y, Cheng Y, Lu G Y, Zhang X K. 2013a.Screening and identification of waterlogging tolerantrapeseed (Brassica napus L.) during germination stage.In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference onIntelligent System Design and Engineering Applications(ISDEA), Hong Kong, China. pp. 1248-1253Zou X L, Hu C W, Zeng L, Cheng Y, Xu M Y, Zhang X K. 2014b.A comparison of screening methods to identify waterloggingtolerance in the field in Brassica napus L. during plantontogeny. PLOS ONE, 9, 1-9Zou X L, Jiang Y Y, Liu L, Zhang Z X, Zheng Y L. 2010.Identification of transcriptome induced in roots of maizeseedlings at the late stage of waterlogging. BMC PlantBiology, 10, 1-16Zou X L, Tan X Y, Hu C W, Zeng L, Lu G Y, Fu G P, Cheng Y,Zhang X K. 2013b. The transcriptome of Brassica napus L.roots under waterlogging at the seedling stage. InternationalJournal of Molecular Sciences, 14, 2637-2651 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
