|
|
|
|
|
| Reduction of arsenic bioavailability by amending seven inorganic materials in arsenic contaminated soil |
| SUN Yuan-yuan, LIU Rong-le, ZENG Xi-bai, LIN Qi-mei, BAI Ling-yu, LI Lian-fang, SU Shi-ming, WANG Ya-nan |
1、Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
2、Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China
3、College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 Seven inorganic amendment materials were added into arsenic (As) contaminated soil at a rate of 0.5% (w/w); the materials used were sepiolite, red mud, iron grit, phosphogypsum, ferrihydrite, iron phosphate, and layered double oxides (LDO). Plant growth trials using rape (edible rape, Brassia campestris L.) as a bio-indicator are commonly used to assess As bioavailability in soils. In this study, B. campestris was grown in a contaminated soil for 50 days. All of the inorganic amendments significantly inhibited the uptake of As by B. campestris. Following soil treatment with the seven aforementioned inorganic ammendments, the As concentrations in the edible parts of B. campestris were reduced by 28.6, 10.5, 8.7, 31.0, 47.4, 25.3, and 28.8%, respectively, as compared with the plants grown in control soil. The most effective amendment was ferrihydrite, which reduced As concentration in B. campestris from 1.84 to 0.97 mg kg–1, compared to control. Furthermore, ferrihydrite-treated soils had a remarkable decrease in both non-specifically sorbed As and available-As by 67 and 20%, respectively, comparing to control. Phosphogypsum was the most cost-effective amendment and it showed excellent performance in reducing the water soluble As in soils by 31% and inhibiting As uptake in B. campestris by 21% comparing to control. Additionally, obvious differences in As transfer rates were observed in the various amendments. The seven amendment materials used in this study all showed potential reduction of As bioavailability and influence on plant growth and other biological processes still need to be further explored in the long term.
Abstract Seven inorganic amendment materials were added into arsenic (As) contaminated soil at a rate of 0.5% (w/w); the materials used were sepiolite, red mud, iron grit, phosphogypsum, ferrihydrite, iron phosphate, and layered double oxides (LDO). Plant growth trials using rape (edible rape, Brassia campestris L.) as a bio-indicator are commonly used to assess As bioavailability in soils. In this study, B. campestris was grown in a contaminated soil for 50 days. All of the inorganic amendments significantly inhibited the uptake of As by B. campestris. Following soil treatment with the seven aforementioned inorganic ammendments, the As concentrations in the edible parts of B. campestris were reduced by 28.6, 10.5, 8.7, 31.0, 47.4, 25.3, and 28.8%, respectively, as compared with the plants grown in control soil. The most effective amendment was ferrihydrite, which reduced As concentration in B. campestris from 1.84 to 0.97 mg kg–1, compared to control. Furthermore, ferrihydrite-treated soils had a remarkable decrease in both non-specifically sorbed As and available-As by 67 and 20%, respectively, comparing to control. Phosphogypsum was the most cost-effective amendment and it showed excellent performance in reducing the water soluble As in soils by 31% and inhibiting As uptake in B. campestris by 21% comparing to control. Additionally, obvious differences in As transfer rates were observed in the various amendments. The seven amendment materials used in this study all showed potential reduction of As bioavailability and influence on plant growth and other biological processes still need to be further explored in the long term.
|
|
Received: 12 May 2014
Accepted:
|
| Fund: The author acknowledges the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41171255), and the National Scientific and Technology Program during12th Five-Year Plan period, China (2012BAD14B02). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
ZENG Xi-bai, Tel: +86-10-82105612,E-mail: zengxibai@caas.cn; LIN Qi-mei, Tel: +86-10-62892502,E-mail: linqm@cau.edu.cn
E-mail: zengxibai@caas.cn;linqm@cau.edu.cn
|
| About author: SUN Yuan-yuan, Tel: +86-10-82106009, E-mail: sunoo126@163.com |
Cite this article:
SUN Yuan-yuan, LIU Rong-le, ZENG Xi-bai, LIN Qi-mei, BAI Ling-yu, LI Lian-fang, SU Shi-ming, WANG Ya-nan.
2015.
Reduction of arsenic bioavailability by amending seven inorganic materials in arsenic contaminated soil. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(7): 1414-1422.
|
| Bai L H, Zhang S Y, Zhang N M, Xia Y S, Wang Y S, JiangR, Zhao H. 2011. Effect of different phosphogypsumaddition levels and mycorrhizal inoculation on growth andphosphorus, sulfur and arsenic uptake by maize plants (Zeamays L). Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 31, 2485-2492(in Chinese)Bothe J V, Brown P W. 1999. Arsenic immobilization by calciumarsenate formation. Environmental Science Technology,33, 3806-3811Castaldi P, Melis P, Silvetti M, Deiana P, Garau G. 2009.Influence of pea and wheat growth on Pb, Cd, and Znmobility and soil biological status in a polluted amendedsoil. Geoderma, 151, 241-248Castaldi P, Silvetti M, Enzo S, Melis P. 2010. Study of sorptionprocesses and FT-IR analysis of arsenate sorbed ontored muds (a bauxite ore processing waste). Journal ofHazardous Materials, 175, 172-178Chen T B, Song B, Zheng Y M, Huang Z C, Lei M, Liao X Y.2006. A survey of lead concentrations in vegetables andsoils in Beijing and their health risk. Scientia AgriculturaSinica, 39, 1589-1597 (in Chinese)Dutré V, Vandecasteele C, Opdenakker S. 1999. Oxidation ofarsenic bearing fly ash as pretreatment before solidification.Journal of Hazardous Materials, 68, 205-215Ettler V, Mihaljevi? M, Šebek O, Nechutný Z. 2007. Antimonyavailability in highly polluted soils and sediments: Acomparison of single extractions. Chemosphere, 68,455-463Fernandez P, Sommer I, Cram S, Rosas I, Gutiérrez M. 2005.The influence of water-soluble As (III) and As (V) ondehydrogenase activity in soils affected by mine tailings.Science of The Total Environment, 348, 231-243Fitz W J, Wenzel W W. 2002. Arsenic transformations in thesoil-rizosphere-plant system: Fundamentals and potentialapplication to phytoremediation. Journal of Biotechnology,99, 259-278Garau G, Castaldi P, Santona L, Deiana P, Melis P.2007. Influence of red mud, zeolite and lime on heavymetal immobilization, culturable heterotrophic microbialpopulations andenzyme activities in a contaminated soil.Geoderma, 142, 47-57Garau G, Silvetti M, Deiana S, Deiana P, Castaldi P. 2011.Long-term influence of red mud on As mobility and soilphysico-chemical and microbial parameters in a pollutedsub-acidic soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 185,1241-1248Ghosh A K, Bhattacharyya P, Pal R. 2004. Effect of arseniccontamination on microbial biomass and its activities inarsenic contaminated soils of Gangetic West Bengal, India.Environment International, 30, 491-499González-Núñez R, Alba M D, Orta M M, Vidal M, Rigol A.2012. Remediation of metal-contaminated soils with theaddition of materials -Part II: Leaching tests to evaluate theefficiency of materials in the remediation of contaminatedsoils. Chemosphere, 87, 829-837Gray C W, Dunham S J, Dennis P G, Zhao F J, McGrath S P.2006. Field evaluation of in situ remediation of a heavy metalcontaminated soil using lime and red-mud. EnvironmentalPollution, 142, 530-539Hartley W, Edwards R, Lepp N W. 2004. Arsenic and heavymetal mobility in iron oxide-amended contaminated soilsas evaluated by short- and long-term leaching tests.Environmental Pollution, 131, 495-504Hartley W, Lepp N W. 2008. Effect of in situ soil amendments onarsenic uptake in successive harvests of ryegrass (Loliumperenne cv Elka) grown in amended As-polluted soils.Environmental Pollution, 156, 1030-1040Kumpiene J, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C. 2008. Stabilization of As,Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments -A review.Waste Management, 28, 215-225Lenoble V, Laclautre C, Deluchat V, Serpaud B, Bollinger J C.2005. Arsenic removal by adsorption on iron(III) phosphate.Journal of Hazardous Materials, 123, 262-268Li Y R, Wang J, Luan Z K, Liang Z. 2010. Arsenic removal fromaqueous solution using ferrous based red mud sludge.Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177, 131-137Liang X F, Xu Y M, Wang L, Sun G H, Qin X, Sun Y. 2011. Insituimmobilization of cadmium and lead in a contaminatedagricultural field by adding natural clays combined withphosphate fertilizer. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 31,1011-1018 (in Chinese)Lidelöw S, Ragnvaldsson D, Leffler P, Testfaildet S, Maurice C.2007. Field trials to assess the use of iron-bearing industrialby-products for stabilization of chromated copper arsenatecontaminatedsoil. Science of The Total Environment, 387,68-78Lombi E, Zhao F J, Zhang G Y, Sun B, Fitz W, Zhang H,MaGrath S P. 2002. In situ fixation of metals in soils usingbauxite residue: chemical assessment. EnvironmentalPollution, 118, 435-443Lopes G, Guilherme L R G, Costa E T S, Curi N, Penha HG V. 2013. Increasing arsenic sorption on red mud byphosphogypsum addition. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 262, 1196-1203Lu R K. 1999. Analytical Methods for Soil Agricultural Chemistry.China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing.pp. 22-27 (in Chinese)Lü L, He J, Wei M, Evans D G, Duan X. 2006. Factorsinfluencing the removal of fluoride fromaqueous solution bycalcined Mg-Al-CO3 layered double hydroxides. Journal ofHazardous Materials, 133, 119-128Mench M, Vangronsveld J, Didier V, Clijsters H. 1994. Evaluationof metal mobility, plant availability and immobilization bychemical agents in limed-silty soil. Environmental Pollution,86, 279-286Mench M, Vansgrosveld J, Lepp N, Edwards R. 1998.Physico-chemical aspects and efficiency of trace elementimmobilization by soil amendments. In: Vangronsveld J,Cunningham S, eds., Metal-Contaminated Soils: In SituInactivation and Phytorestoration. Springer, Berlin. pp.151-182MEP (Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’sRepublic of China). 1995. Environmental Quality Standardfor Soils. Standards Press of China, Beijing. pp. 1-3. (inChinese)MOH (Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China).2003. Determination of Total Arsenic and Abio-Arsenic inFoods. Standards Press of China, Beijing. pp. 71-84 (inChinese)Pena M, Meng X G, Korfiatis G P, Jing C Y. 2006. Adsorptionmechanism of arsenic on nanocrystalline titanium dioxide.Environmental Science Technology, 40, 1257-1262Simón M, Diez M, González V, García I, Martín F, Haro D S.2010. Use of liming in the remediation of soils polluted bysulphide oxidation: a leaching-column study. Journal ofHazardous Materials, 180, 241-246Sun X, Doner H E. 1998. Adsorption and oxidation of arseniteon goethite. Soil Science, 163, 278-287Sun Y B, Sun G H, Xu Y M, Wang L, Liang X F, Lin D S. 2013.Assessment of sepiolite for immobilization of cadmiumcontaminatedsoils. Geoderma, 193-194, 149-155Sun Y Y, Zeng X B, Bai L Y, Wang J J, Li L F, Su S M, WangY N, Duan R, Wu C X. 2013. Regulation of exogenousin meadow cinnamon soils by applying layered doubleoxides and modified red mud. Journal of Agro-EnvironmentScience, 32, 1545-1551 (in Chinese)Sun Y Y, Zeng X B, Bai L Y. 2011. Adsorption of arsenatefrom aqueous solution by Mg/Al layered double oxide. ActaScientiae Circumstantiae, 31, 1377-1385 (in Chinese)Száková J, Tlustoš P, Goessler W, Frková Z, Najmanová J.2009. Mobility of arsenic and its com pounds in soil andsoil solution: The effect of soil pretreatment and extractionmethods. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172, 1244-1251Vandecasteele C, Dutré V, Geysen D, Wauter G. 2002.Solidification/stabilization of arsenic bearing fly ash frommetallurgical industry. Immobilization mechanism of arsenic.Waste Management, 22, 143-146Warren G P, Alloway B J, Lepp N W, Singh B, Bochereau FJ M, Penny C. 2003. Field trials to assess the uptake ofarsenic by vegetables from contaminated soils and soilremediation with iron oxides. The Science of the TotalEnvironment, 311, 19-33Wenzel W W, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, Stingeder G, LombiE, Adriano D C. 2001. Arsenic fractionation in soils usingan improved sequential extraction procedure. AnalyticaChimica Acta, 436, 309-323Woolson E A, Axley J H, Kearney P C. 1971. Correlationbetween available soil arsenic, estimated by six methodsand response of corn (Zea mays L.). Soil Science Societyof America Journal, 35, 101.Wu P P, Zeng X B. 2011. Study on arsenate adsorption bysynthetic iron and aluminum oxides/hydroxides. ChinaEvironmnetal Science, 31, 603-610 (in Chinese)Xu Y M, Li J X, Dai X H, Yuan Z H. 2003. Effects of in-situinactivation on behaviour of lead in contaminated soil.Journal of Agro-Environmental Science, 22, 685-688 (inChinese)Yan X L, Zhang M, Liao X Y, Tu S X. 2012. Influence ofamendments on soil arsenic fraction and phytoavailabilityby Pteris vittata L. Chemosphere, 88, 240-244Zeng X B, Li L F, Mei X R. 2007. Heavy metal content in soilsof vegetable-growing lands in China and source analysis.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 40, 2507-2517 ( in Chinese)Zeng X B, Xu J M, Huang Q Y, Tang S R, Li Y T, Li F B, ZhouD M, Wu Z J. 2013. Some deliberations on the issues ofheavy metals in farmlands of China. Acta Pedologica Sinica,50, 186-194 (in Chinese)Zhou M, Tan J, Jin W. 2011. Soil pollution: Heavy metalsare more toxic than pesticides. [2011-03-02]. http://www.Xinhuanet.com (in Chinese) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
