Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2015, Vol. 14 Issue (4): 765-773    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60789-9
Soil & Fertilization﹒Irrigation﹒Plant Nutrition﹒ Agro-Ecology & Environment Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Soil profile characteristics of high-productivity alluvial cambisols in the North China Plain
 LIU Hai-tao, LI Bao-guo, REN Tu-sheng
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  The North China Plain (NCP) is one of major breadbaskets in China. Crop growth and grain yield differ significantly with spatial variations of soil properties. This study aims to identify the key soil properties in relation to the grain yield for the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system in a high-productivity farmland of the NCP. The field trials were conducted in three fields with different grain yield levels in Tai’an City, Shandong Province, China, during the 2009–2012 period. Consistent field management strategies were applied in the three fields. Fifty-one physical and chemical indicators of the soil profile as related to grain yield were evaluated. An approximate maximum of 17.8% annual average grain yield difference was observed in the fields during the period of 2009–2012. The soil indicators were classified into three clusters with specific functions using cluster analysis, and three key indicators were extracted from each cluster to characterize the different soil properties of three fields. The first cluster represented soil water retention capacity, and the key indicator was available soil water (ASW), which ranged from 153 to 187 mm in the 1.2 m profile and was correlated positively with grain yield. The second cluster represented soil water conductivity, as measured by saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks). The higher yield field had a greater capacity to retain topsoil water for its lower Ks (1.9 cm d–1) in the 30–70 cm soil layer as compared to the lower yield field. The third cluster represented nutrient storage and supply, as indicated by the ratio of nutrient content to silt+clay content of the top soil layer. The ratio of soil organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), available P, exchangeable K+ to silt+clay content in the 0–20 cm soil layer were 19.0 g kg–1, 1.6 g kg–1, 94.7 mg kg–1, 174.3 mg kg–1 in the higher yield field, respectively, and correlated positively with the grain yield. By characterizing the differences in soil properties among fields with different yield levels, this study offers the scientific basis for increasing grain yield potential by improving the soil conditions in the NCP.

Abstract  The North China Plain (NCP) is one of major breadbaskets in China. Crop growth and grain yield differ significantly with spatial variations of soil properties. This study aims to identify the key soil properties in relation to the grain yield for the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system in a high-productivity farmland of the NCP. The field trials were conducted in three fields with different grain yield levels in Tai’an City, Shandong Province, China, during the 2009–2012 period. Consistent field management strategies were applied in the three fields. Fifty-one physical and chemical indicators of the soil profile as related to grain yield were evaluated. An approximate maximum of 17.8% annual average grain yield difference was observed in the fields during the period of 2009–2012. The soil indicators were classified into three clusters with specific functions using cluster analysis, and three key indicators were extracted from each cluster to characterize the different soil properties of three fields. The first cluster represented soil water retention capacity, and the key indicator was available soil water (ASW), which ranged from 153 to 187 mm in the 1.2 m profile and was correlated positively with grain yield. The second cluster represented soil water conductivity, as measured by saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks). The higher yield field had a greater capacity to retain topsoil water for its lower Ks (1.9 cm d–1) in the 30–70 cm soil layer as compared to the lower yield field. The third cluster represented nutrient storage and supply, as indicated by the ratio of nutrient content to silt+clay content of the top soil layer. The ratio of soil organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (TN), available P, exchangeable K+ to silt+clay content in the 0–20 cm soil layer were 19.0 g kg–1, 1.6 g kg–1, 94.7 mg kg–1, 174.3 mg kg–1 in the higher yield field, respectively, and correlated positively with the grain yield. By characterizing the differences in soil properties among fields with different yield levels, this study offers the scientific basis for increasing grain yield potential by improving the soil conditions in the NCP.
Keywords:  soil quality assessment       cluster analysis       grain yield       key soil indicators  
Received: 17 February 2014   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB150403).

Corresponding Authors:  LI Bao-guo, Tel: +86-10-62732850, Fax: +86-10-62733596, E-mail: libg@cau.edu.cn     E-mail:  libg@cau.edu.cn
About author:  LIU Hai-tao, Tel: +86-10-62732850, E-mail: liuht1986@163.com;

Cite this article: 

LIU Hai-tao, LI Bao-guo, REN Tu-sheng. 2015. Soil profile characteristics of high-productivity alluvial cambisols in the North China Plain. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(4): 765-773.

Soil & Fertilization Irrigation • Plant Nutrition •Agro-Ecology & Environment

Abrol I, Khosla B, Bhumbla D. 1968. Relationship of textureto some important soil moisture constants. Geoderma, 2,33-39

Amoozegar A, Warrick A W. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity ofsaturated soils: Field methods. In: Klute A, ed., Methods ofSoil Analysis. Part 1-Physical and Mineralogical Methods.Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 735-770.

Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R, Post W M, Owens L. 2006. Changesin long-term no-till corn growth and yield under differentrates of stover mulch. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1128-1136

China National Statistics Bureau (CNBS). 2004. ChinaStatistical Yearbook, China Statistical Publishing House.(in Chinese)

Doran J W, Parkin B T. 1994. De?ning and assessing soilquality. In: Doran J W, Coleman D C, Bezdicek D F,Stewart B A, eds., Defining Soil Quality for a SustainableEnvironment Soil Science Society of America, Inc. SpecialPublication, Madison, WI, USA. pp. 3-21

Givi J, Prasher S, Patel R. 2004. Evaluation of pedotransferfunctions in predicting the soil water contents at fieldcapacity and wilting point. Agricultural Water Management,70, 83-96

Govaerts B, Sayre K D, Deckers J. 2006. A minimum data setfor soil quality assessment of wheat and maize croppingin the highlands of Mexico. Soil and Tillage Research, 87,163-174

Hassink J. 1992. Effects of soil texture and structure on carbonand nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils. Biology andFertility of Soils, 14, 126-134

Hassink J, Bouwman L, Zwart K, Bloem J, Brussaard L. 1993.Relationships between soil texture, physical protection oforganic matter, soil biota, and C and N mineralization ingrassland soils. Geoderma, 57, 105-128

Jagadamma S, Lal R, Hoeft R G, Naffiger E D, Adee E A. 2008.Nitrogen fertilization and cropping system impacts on soilproperties and their relationship to crop yield in the centralCorn Belt, USA. Soil and Tillage Research, 98, 120-129

Jaynes D, Kaspar T, Colvin T, James D. 2003. Cluster analysis of spatiotemporal corn yield patterns in an Iowa field.Agronomy Journal, 95, 574-586

Jiang P, Thelen K. 2004. Effect of soil and topographicproperties on crop yield in a north-central corn-soybeancropping system. Agronomy Journal, 96, 252-258

Johnson R A, Wichern D W. 1992. Applied MultivariateStatistical Analysis. 3rd ed., Prentice Hall EnglewoodCliffs, NJ.

Knudsen D, Peterson G A, Pratt P F. 1982. Lithium, sodium,potassium. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R,eds., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2-Chemical andMicrobiological Properties. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp.225-246

Kravchenko A N, Bullock D G. 2000. Correlation of corn andsoybean grain yield with topography and soil properties.Agronomy Journal, 92, 75-83

Larson W, Pierce F. 1991. Conservation and enhancement ofsoil quality. Evaluation for Sustainable Land Managementin the Developing World, 2, 175-203

Larson W E, Pierce F J. 1994. The dynamics of soil quality asa measure of sustainable management. In: Kimble J M,Lai T, Follett T F, eds., Agricultural Practices and Policiesfor Carbon Sequestration in Soil. Lewis Publ, FL, USA.pp. 21-30

Liu Z, Zhou W, Shen J, Li S, He P, Liang G. 2014a. Soil qualityassessment of Albic soils with different productivities foreastern China. Soil and Tillage Research, 140, 74-81

Liu Z, Zhou W, Shen J, Li S, Liang G, Wang X, Sun J, Ai C.2014b. Soil quality assessment of acid sulfate paddy soilswith different productivities in Guangdong Province, China.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 1, 177-186

Merrill S D, Liebig M A, Tanaka D L, Krupinsky J M, Hanson JD. 2013. Comparison of soil quality and productivity at twosites differing in profile structure and topsoil properties.Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 179, 53-61

Olsen S R, Sommers L E. 1982. Phosphorous. In: Page A L,Miller R H, Keeney D R, eds., Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 2-Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison,Wisconsin, USA. pp. 421-422

Quiroga A, Funaro D, Noellemeyer E, Peinemann N. 2006.Barley yield response to soil organic matter and texturein the Pampas of Argentina. Soil and Tillage Research,90, 63-68

Rawls W, Gimenez D, Grossman R. 1998. Use of soil texture,bulk density, and slope of the water retention curve topredict saturated hydraulic conductivity. Transactions ofthe ASAE, 41, 983-988

Sena M, Frighetto R, Valarini P, Tokeshi H, Poppi R. 2002.Discrimination of management effects on soil parameters byusing principal component analysis: a multivariate analysiscase study. Soil and Tillage Research, 67, 171-181

Yao R, Yang J, Gao P, Zhang J, Jin W. 2013. Determiningminimum data set for soil quality assessment of typicalsalt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area. Soiland Tillage Research, 128, 137-148

Zhang X, Chen S, Liu M, Pei D, Sun H. 2005. Improved wateruse efficiency associated with cultivars and agronomicmanagement in the North China Plain. Agronomy Journal,97, 783-790
[1] WEI Huan-he, GE Jia-lin, ZHANG Xu-bin, ZHU Wang, DENG Fei, REN Wan-jun, CHEN Ying-long, MENG Tian-yao, DAI Qi-gen. Decreased panicle N application alleviates the negative effects of shading on rice grain yield and grain quality[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2041-2053.
[2] DING Yong-gang, ZHANG Xin-bo, MA Quan, LI Fu-jian, TAO Rong-rong, ZHU Min, Li Chun-yan, ZHU Xin-kai, GUO Wen-shan, DING Jin-feng. Tiller fertility is critical for improving grain yield, photosynthesis and nitrogen efficiency in wheat[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 2054-2066.
[3] LIU Dan, ZHAO De-hui, ZENG Jian-qi, Rabiu Sani SHAWAI, TONG Jing-yang, LI Ming, LI Fa-ji, ZHOU Shuo, HU Wen-li, XIA Xian-chun, TIAN Yu-bing, ZHU Qian, WANG Chun-ping, WANG De-sen, HE Zhong-hu, LIU Jin-dong, ZHANG Yong. Identification of genetic loci for grain yield‑related traits in the wheat population Zhongmai 578/Jimai 22[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(7): 1985-1999.
[4] ZHAO Xiao-dong, QIN Xiao-rui, LI Ting-liang, CAO Han-bing, XIE Ying-he. Effects of planting patterns plastic film mulching on soil temperature, moisture, functional bacteria and yield of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(5): 1560-1573.
[5] LI Min, ZHU Da-wei, JIANG Ming-jin, LUO De-qiang, JIANG Xue-hai, JI Guang-mei, LI Li-jiang, ZHOU Wei-jia. Dry matter production and panicle characteristics of high yield and good taste indica hybrid rice varieties[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(5): 1338-1350.
[6] WANG Xin-yu, YANG Guo-dong, XU Le, XIANG Hong-shun, YANG Chen, WANG Fei, PENG Shao-bing. Grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of an ultrashort-duration variety grown under different nitrogen and seeding rates in direct-seeded and double-season rice in Central China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(4): 1009-1020.
[7] ZHOU Qun, YUAN Rui, ZHANG Wei-yang, GU Jun-fei, LIU Li-jun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Zhi-qin, YANG Jian-chang. Grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and physiological performance of indica/japonica hybrid rice in response to various nitrogen rates[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 63-79.
[8] ZHENG Chang, WANG Yue-chao, XU Wen-ba, YANG De-sheng, YANG Guo-dong, YANG Chen, HUANG Jian-liang, PENG Shao-bing. Border effects of the main and ratoon crops in rice ratooning system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 80-91.
[9] HAN Yu-ling, GUO Dong, MA Wei, GE Jun-zhu, LI Xiang-ling, Ali Noor MEHMOOD, ZHAO Ming, ZHOU Bao-yuan. Strip deep rotary tillage combined with controlled-release urea improves the grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize in the North China Plain[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2559-2576.
[10] DENG Fei, HE Lian-hua, CHEN Duo, ZHANG Chi, TIAN Qing-lan, WU Zhen-yuan, LI Qiu-ping, ZENG Yu-ling, ZHONG Xiao-yuan, CHEN Hong, WANG Li, REN Wan-jun. Growth characteristics and grain yield of machine-transplanted medium indica hybrid rice with high daily yield[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2547-2558.
[11] XU Chen-chen, ZHANG Ping, WANG Yuan-yuan, LUO Ning, TIAN Bei-jing, LIU Xi-wei, WANG Pu, HUANG Shou-bing. Grain yield and grain moisture associations with leaf, stem and root characteristics in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(7): 1941-1951.
[12] HUANG Jin-wen, WU Jia-yi, CHEN Hong-fei, ZHANG Zhi-xing, FANG Chang-xun, SHAO Cai-hong, LIN Wei-wei, WENG Pei-ying, Muhammad Umar KHAN, LIN Wen-xiong . Optimal management of nitrogen fertilizer in the main rice crop and its carrying-over effect on ratoon rice under mechanized cultivation in Southeast China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(2): 351-364.
[13] Ebrahim ROOHI, Reza MOHAMMADI, Abdoul Aziz NIANE, Javad VAFABAKHSH, Mozaffar ROUSTAEE, Mohammad Reza JALAL KAMALI, Shahriar SOHRABI, Shahriar FATEHI, Hossain TARIMORADI. Genotype×tillage interaction and the performance of winter bread wheat genotypes in temperate and cold dryland conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3199-3215.
[14] HUANG Li-ying, Li Xiao-xiao, ZHANG Yun-bo, Shah FAHAD, WANG Fei. dep1 improves rice grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency simultaneously by enhancing nitrogen and dry matter translocation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3185-3198.
[15] TU De-bao JIANG Yang, ZHANG Li-juan, CAI Ming-li, LI Cheng-fang, CAO Cou-gui. Effect of various combinations of temperature during different phenolgical stages on indica rice yield and quality in Yangtze River Basin in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(10): 2900-2909.
No Suggested Reading articles found!