Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2013, Vol. 12 Issue (10): 1896-1904    DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60598-5
Agricultural Economics And Management Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Productivity Growth in China’s Agriculture During 1985-2010
 LI  Zhou, ZHANG  Hai-peng
1 Rural Development Institute, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100732, P.R.China
2 Collaborative Innovation Center for Rural Reform and Development, Beijing 100732, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  This paper made an empirical analysis of China’s agricultural growth path and influential factors using the province-level panel data of agricultural inputs and outputs during 1985-2010. The findings indicate that the increase in agricultural inputs and TFP contributed 40.6 and 55.2% to the agricultural output growth, respectively; China’s agriculture had jumped out of the pattern which output growth was mainly driven by increasing input. Of the total inputs, chemical fertilizer had the most important contribution to the output growth, followed by mechanical inputs. The contribution of land and labor was negative. China’s agricultural output growth belonged to the type of induced technology innovation. China’s agricultural TFP growth had characteristics of fluctuations over time and unbalanced between regions, but the gap between the eastern, the middle, and the western regions has been narrowed.

Abstract  This paper made an empirical analysis of China’s agricultural growth path and influential factors using the province-level panel data of agricultural inputs and outputs during 1985-2010. The findings indicate that the increase in agricultural inputs and TFP contributed 40.6 and 55.2% to the agricultural output growth, respectively; China’s agriculture had jumped out of the pattern which output growth was mainly driven by increasing input. Of the total inputs, chemical fertilizer had the most important contribution to the output growth, followed by mechanical inputs. The contribution of land and labor was negative. China’s agricultural output growth belonged to the type of induced technology innovation. China’s agricultural TFP growth had characteristics of fluctuations over time and unbalanced between regions, but the gap between the eastern, the middle, and the western regions has been narrowed.
Keywords:  agricultural output growth       input       total factor productivity (TFP)  
Received: 19 January 2013   Accepted:
Fund: 

This study was supported by the Projects of National Survey of CASS (Survey of Grain Production in China).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence LI Zhou, Tel: +86-10-65275067, E-mail: lizhou@cass.org.cn     E-mail:  lizhou@cass.org.cn

Cite this article: 

LI Zhou, ZHANG Hai-peng. 2013. Productivity Growth in China’s Agriculture During 1985-2010. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(10): 1896-1904.

[1]Fan S G, Pardey P. 1997. Research, Productivity, and output growth in Chinese agriculture. Journal of Development Economics, 53, 115-137.

[2]Fan S G, Zhang X B. 2002. Production and productivity growth in Chinese agriculture: new national and regional measures. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50, 819-838.

[3]Federico G. 2005. Feeding the World: an Economic History of Agriculture (1800-2000). Princeton University Press, Princeton. pp. 69-82.

[4]Griliches Z. 1963. The source of measured productivity growth: united states agriculture, 1940-1960. Journal of Political Economy, 71, 331.

[5]Huang J K. 2010. 60-year China’s agricultural development and 30-year reform miracle - institutional innovation, technology progress and market reform. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 1, 4-18. (in Chinese)

[6]Huang J K, Rozelle S. 1996. Technological change: rediscovering the engine of productivity growth in China’s rural economy. Journal of Development Economics, 49, 337-369.

[7]Jin S Q, Huang J K, Hu R F, Rozelle S. 2002. The creation and spread of technology and total factor productivity in China’s agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 916-930.

[8]Lin J Y. 1992. Rural reforms and agricultural growth in China. American Economic Review, 82, 34-51.

[9]Mao W, Koo W W. 1997. Productivity growth, technological progress, and efficiency change in chinese agriculture after rural economic reforms: a DEA approach. China Economic Review, 2, 157-174.

[10]McMillan J W J, Zhu L. 1989. The impact of China’s economic reform on agricultural productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 781-809.

[11]Qiao Z, Jiao F Y, Li N. 2006. Changes in China’s rural economic system and agricultural growth - empirical research of China’s agricultural growth during 1978- 2004. Economic Research Journal, 7, 73-82. (in Chinese)

[12]Wen J G. 1993. Total factor productivity change in China’s farming sector: 1952-1989. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42, 1-41.

[13]Xin X F, Qin F. 2005. Analysis of factors affecting China’s agricultural growth and comparison of differences between regions. Xinjiang State Farm Economy, 12, 9-13. (in Chinese)

[14]Xu Y F. 1999. Agricultural productivity in China. China Economic Review, 10, 108-121.

[15]Zhang X S, Gui B W. 2008. China’s TFP analysis: malmquist approach review and application. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 6, 111-122. (in Chinese)

[16]Zhao W, Cheng J. 2011. Re-examining China’s agricultural TFP - adjustment of basic data and comparison of two methods. Chinese Rural Economy, 10, 4-15. (in Chinese)

[17]Zhou D M. 2009. Technology progress, technical efficiency and China’s agricultural productivity growth - empirical analysis based on DEA. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 12, 70-82. (in Chinese)
[1] LIU Zhu, NAN Zhen-wu, LIN Song-ming, YU Hai-qiu, XIE Li-yong, MENG Wei-wei, ZHANG Zheng, WAN Shu-bo. Millet/peanut intercropping at a moderate N rate increases crop productivity and N use efficiency, as well as economic benefits, under rain-fed conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 738-751.
[2] Viet-Ngu HOANG, Trung Thanh NGUYEN, Clevo WILSON, Thong Quoc HO, Uttam KHANAL. Scale and scope economies in small household rice farming in Vietnam[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(12): 3339-3351.
[3] WEI Huan-he, MENG Tian-yao, GE Jia-lin, ZHANG Xu-bin, LU Yu, LI Xin-yue, TAO Yuan, DING En-hao, CHEN Ying-long, DAI Qi-gen. Morpho-physiological traits contributing to better yield performance of japonica/indica hybrids over indica hybrids under input-reduced practices[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(11): 2643-2655.
[4] Muhammad ISHFAQ, Nadeem AKBAR, shakeel Ahmed ANJUM, Muhammad ANWAR-UL-HAQ. Growth, yield and water productivity of dry direct seeded rice and transplanted aromatic rice under different irrigation management regimes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(11): 2656-2673.
[5] LIU Kai-lou, HUANG Jing, LI Da-ming, YU Xi-chu, YE Hui-cai, HU Hui-wen, HU Zhi-hua, HUANG Qing-hai, ZHANG Hui-min. Comparison of carbon sequestration efficiency in soil aggregates between upland and paddy soils in a red soil region of China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(6): 1348-1359.
[6] WEN Jie, LI Jiu-sheng, LI Yan-feng. Wetting patterns and bacterial distributions in different soils from a surface point source applying effluents with varying Escherichia coli concentrations[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(7): 1625-1637.
[7] XU Yong-mei, LIU Hua, WANG Xi-he, XU Ming-gang, ZHANG Wen-ju , JIANG Gui-ying. Changes in Organic Carbon Index of Grey Desert Soil in Northwest China After Long-Term Fertilization[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(3): 554-561.
[8] CHEN Yong-fu, WU Zhi-gang, ZHU Tie-hui, YANG Lei, MA Guo-ying, Chien Hsiao-ping. Agricultural Policy, Climate Factors and Grain Output: Evidence From Household Survey Data in Rural China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12(1): 169-183.
No Suggested Reading articles found!