|
|
|
Pretreatment of Rice Straw by Hydrogen Peroxide for Enhanced Methane Yield |
SONG Zi-lin, YAG Gai-he, FENG Yong-zhong, REN Guang-xin, HAN Xin-hui |
1.College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China
2.College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China
3.Research Center for Recycling Agricultural Engineering Technology of Shaanxi Province, Yangling 712100, P.R.China |
|
|
摘要 A pretreatment process for hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was optimized to enhance the biodegradation performance of rice straw and increase biogas yield. A determination experiment was conducted under predicted optimal conditions. Optimization was implemented using response surface methodology. The effects of biodegradation and the interactive effects of pretreatment time (PT), H2O2 concentration (HC), and substrate to inoculum ratio (S/I) on methane yield were investigated. The lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose of rice straw were significantly degraded with increasing HC. The optimal conditions for the use of pretreated rice straw in anaerobic digestion were a 6.18-d PT, 2.68% HC (w/w total solid), and 1.08 S/I; these conditions result in a methane yield of 288 mL g-1 volatile solids (VS). A determination coefficient of 95.2% was obtained, indicating that the model used to predict the anabolic digestion process has a favorable fit with the experimental parameters. The determination experiment resulted in a methane yield of 290 mL g-1 VS, 88.0% higher than that of untreated rice straw. Thus, H2O2 pretreatment of rice straw can be used to improve methane yields during biogas production.
Abstract A pretreatment process for hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was optimized to enhance the biodegradation performance of rice straw and increase biogas yield. A determination experiment was conducted under predicted optimal conditions. Optimization was implemented using response surface methodology. The effects of biodegradation and the interactive effects of pretreatment time (PT), H2O2 concentration (HC), and substrate to inoculum ratio (S/I) on methane yield were investigated. The lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose of rice straw were significantly degraded with increasing HC. The optimal conditions for the use of pretreated rice straw in anaerobic digestion were a 6.18-d PT, 2.68% HC (w/w total solid), and 1.08 S/I; these conditions result in a methane yield of 288 mL g-1 volatile solids (VS). A determination coefficient of 95.2% was obtained, indicating that the model used to predict the anabolic digestion process has a favorable fit with the experimental parameters. The determination experiment resulted in a methane yield of 290 mL g-1 VS, 88.0% higher than that of untreated rice straw. Thus, H2O2 pretreatment of rice straw can be used to improve methane yields during biogas production.
|
Received: 29 September 2012
Accepted:
|
Fund: This work was financially supported by the Key Technologies R&D Program of China during the 11th Five-Year Plan period (2011BAD15B03), the Basic Scientific Fund of Northwest A&F University of China (QM2012002). |
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence YANG Gai-he, Mobile: 13709129773, Fax: +86-29-87092265, E-mail: gaiheyang@gmail.com
E-mail: gaiheyang@gmail.com
|
Cite this article:
SONG Zi-lin, YAG Gai-he, FENG Yong-zhong, REN Guang-xin, HAN Xin-hui.
2013.
Pretreatment of Rice Straw by Hydrogen Peroxide for Enhanced Methane Yield. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(7): 1258-1266.
|
[1]American Public Health Association. 1995. StandardMethods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.19th ed. Alpha Med Press, Washington, D.C.Bai J R, Li Y B, Guo O Y, Yang G H, Ren G X, Feng Y Z, Li Y.2009. Effects of ratios of manure and straw, urea andcellulose on biogas yields at different temperatures.Transactions of the CSAE, 25, 188-193 (in Chinese)[2]Bprnsson L, Murto M, Mattiasson B. 2000. Evaluation ofparameters for monitoring an aerobic co-digestionprocess, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,54, 844-849[3]Bremner J M, Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen-Total. In: PageA L, Miller R H, Keeney D R, eds., Methods of SoilAnalysis. Part 2, Chemical and Microbial Properties,Monograph 9. Agronomy Society of AmericaAgronomy Press, Wisconsin. pp. 595-624[4]Chang V S, Nagwani M, Holtzappl M T. 1998. Limepretreatment of crop residues bagasse and wheat straw.Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 74, 135-157[5]Chen Y, Cheng J J, Creamer K S. 2008. Inhibition of anaerobicdigestion process: A review. Bioresource Technology,99, 4044-4064[6]Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.1984. Routine Analysis of Biogas Fermentation. ScienceTechnology Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)Eskicioglu C, Prorot A, Marin J, Droste R L, Kennedy K J.2008. Synergetic pretreatment of sewage sludge bymicrowave irradiation in presence of H2O2 for enhancedanaerobic digestion. Water Research, 42, 4674-4682[7]Ferreira S L C, Bruns R E, Ferreira H S, Matos G D, David JM, Brandao G C, Silva E G P, Portugal L A, Reis P S,Souza A S. 2007. Box-Behnken design: an alternativefor the optimization of analytical methods. AnalyticaChimica Acta, 597, 179-186[8]Gould J M. 1984. Alkaline peroxide delignification ofagricultural residues to enhance enzymaticsaccharification. Biotechnology and Bioengineering,26, 46-52[9]Isci A, Demirer G N. 2007. Biogas production potential fromcotton wastes. Renewable Energy, 32, 750-757[10]Kim K H, Hong J. 2001. Supercritical CO2 pretreatment oflignocellulose enhances enzymatic cellulosehydrolysis. Bioresource Technology, 77, 139-144[11]Kim S, Dale B E. 2004. Global potential bioethanolproduction from wasted crops and crop residues.Biomass & Bioenergy, 26, 361-375[12]Kim S, Holtzapple M T. 2005. Lime pretreatment andenzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. BioresourceTechnology, 96, 1994-2006[13]Ko J K, Bak J S, Jung M W, Lee H J, Choi I G, Kim T H, KimK H. 2009. Ethanol production from rice straw usingoptimized aqueous-ammonia soaking pretreatment andsimultaneous saccharification and fermentationprocesses. Bioresource Technology, 100, 4374-4380[14]Koch K, Lubken M, Gehring T, Wichern M, Horn H. 2010.Biogas from grass silage-measurements and modelingwith ADM1. Bioresource Technology, 101, 8158-8165[15]Lahav O, Morgan B E. 2004. Titration methodologies formonitoring of anaerobic digestion in developingcountries - a review. Journal of Chemical Technololgyand Biotechnology, 79, 1331-1341[16]Liew L N, Shi J, Li Y B. 2011. Enhancing the solid-stateanaerobic digestion of fallen leaves throughsimultaneous alkaline treatment. BioresourceTechnology, 102, 8828-8834[17]Lin Y Q, Wang D H, Wu S Q, Wang C M. 2009. Alkalipretreatment enhances biogas production in theanaerobic digestion of pulp and paper sludge. Journalof Hazardous Materials, 170, 366-373[18]Liu C, Wyman C E. 2003. The effect of flow rate ofcompressed hot water on xylan, lignin and total massremoval from corn stover. Industrial & EngineeringChemistry Research, 42, 5409-5416[19]Ma S Q, Yuan H R, Zhu B N, Liu Y P, Zou D X, Dang F, PangY Z, Li X J. 2011. Effects of ammoniation pretreatmenton anaerobic digestion performance of rice straw.Transactions of the CSAE, 27, 294-299 (in Chinese)[20]Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee Y Y, HoltzappleM, Ladisch M. 2005. Features of promising technologiesfor pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass.Bioresource Technology, 96, 673-686[21]National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2009. ChinaStatistical Yearbook 2009. China Statistics Press,Beijing, China. (in Chinese)[22]Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1982. Total carbon, organiccarbon, and organic matter. In: Page A L, Miller R H,Keeney D R, eds., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2,Chemical and Microbial Properties, Monograph 9.Agronomy Society of America Agronomy Press,Wisconsin. pp. 539-552[23]Qin G D, Liu R H, Sun C. 2011. Effects of differentconcentrations of NaOH pretreatment on anaerobicdigestion of rice straw for biogas production.Transactions of the CSAE, 27, 59-63 (in Chinese)[24]Ramos L P. 2003. The chemistry involved in the steamtreatment of lignocellulosic materials. Quimica Nova,26, 863-871[25]Rivera E C, Rabelo S C, Garcia D R, Maciel F R, Costa A C.2010. Enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse forbioethanol production: determining optimal enzymeloading using neural networks. Journal of ChemicalTechnology and Biotechnology, 85, 983-992[26]Rivero J A C, Madhavan N, Suidan M T, Ginestet P, AudicJ M. 2006. Oxidative co-treatment using hydrogenperoxide with anaerobic digestion of excess municipalsludge. Water Environment Research, 78, 691-700[27]Song Z L, Li Y B, Yang G H, Qin J J, Ren G X, Feng Y Z.2010. Effect of total solid concentration and temperatureon biogas yields of mixture of chicken manure and cornstraw. Transactions of the CSAE, 26, 260-265 (in Chinese)[28]Song Z L, Yang G H, Guo Y, Zhang T. 2012. Comparison oftwo chemical pretreatments of rice straw for biogasproduction by anaerobic digestion. BioResources, 7,3223-3236[29]Sun Y M, Li G X, Zhang F D, Shi C L, Sun Z J. 2005. Statusquo and developmental strategy of agricultural residuesresources in China. Transactions of the CSAE, 21, 169-173 (in Chinese)[30]Sun Y, Cheng J. 2002. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosicmaterials for ethanol production: a review. BioresourceTechnology, 83, 1-11[31]Teghammar A, Yngvesson J, Lundin M, Taherzadeh M J,Horváth I S. 2010. Pretreatment of paper tube residualsfor improved biogas production. BioresourceTechnology, 101, 1206-1212[32]Teixeira L C, Linden J C, Schroeder H A. 1999. Alkaline andperacetic acid pretreatments of biomass for ethanolproduction. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology,77, 19-34[33]Zhong W Z, Zhang Z Z, Qiao W, Fu P C, Liu M. 2011.Comparison of chemical and biological pretreatment ofcorn straw for biogas production by anaerobicdigestion. Renewable Energy, 36, 1875-1879[34]Zinatizadeh A A L, Mohamed A R, Abdullah A Z, MashitahM D, Isa M H, Najafpour G D. 2006. Process modelingand analysis of palm oil mill effluent treatment in an upflowanaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor usingresponse surface methodology (RSM). Water Research,40, 3193-3208 |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|