|
|
|
|
|
| Drip Irrigation Scheduling for Tomato Grown in Solar Greenhouse Based on Pan Evaporation in North China Plain |
| LIU Hao, DUAN Ai-wang, LI Fu-sheng, SUN Jing-sheng, WANG Yan-cong , SUN Chi-tao |
1.Key Laboratory for Crop Water Requirement and Regulation of Ministry of Agriculture, Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Xinxiang 453003, P.R.China
2.College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 This study has investigated the suitable drip irrigation scheduling for tomato grown in solar greenhouse based on 20-cm pan evaporation (Epan) in North China Plain. Irrigation treatments included three irrigation frequencies (I1 10, I2 20 and I3 30 mm, and irrigation interval of 2-6 d for I1, 4-9 d for I2 and 8-12 d for I3) based on accumulated pan evaporation (Epan), and four plant-pan coefficients (Kcp1 0.5, Kcp2 0.7, Kcp3 0.9 and Kcp4 1.1). Results indicate that total irrigation amount, seasonal crop evapotranspiration (ET) and tomato yield (Y) were 185.1-365.8 mm, 249.1-388.0 mm and 99.6-151.8 t ha-1, respectively. Irrigation frequency and amount increased the yield, and second-degree polynomial relationship was found between Y and ET (R2=0.8671). Irrigation frequency did not increase mean fruit weight, diameter and length significantly but increased fruit number, total soluble solids content (TSS), TSS yield, fruit firmness and water use efficiency (WUE) and irrigation WUE (IWUE) significantly. Irrigation amount increased external quality of tomato but reduced TSS content, TSS yield, fruit firmness, WUE and IWUE significantly. Kcp3 and Kcp4 treatments had the highest fruit yield, but Kcp2 and Kcp3 treatments had the highest WUE. I1Kcp3 treatment (irrigation interval of 2-6 d, and Kcp=0.9) had higher IWUE, WUE, external quality, yield, and TSS yield, so it is recommended as the suitable irrigation scheduling for tomato grown in solar greenhouse in North China Plain.
Abstract This study has investigated the suitable drip irrigation scheduling for tomato grown in solar greenhouse based on 20-cm pan evaporation (Epan) in North China Plain. Irrigation treatments included three irrigation frequencies (I1 10, I2 20 and I3 30 mm, and irrigation interval of 2-6 d for I1, 4-9 d for I2 and 8-12 d for I3) based on accumulated pan evaporation (Epan), and four plant-pan coefficients (Kcp1 0.5, Kcp2 0.7, Kcp3 0.9 and Kcp4 1.1). Results indicate that total irrigation amount, seasonal crop evapotranspiration (ET) and tomato yield (Y) were 185.1-365.8 mm, 249.1-388.0 mm and 99.6-151.8 t ha-1, respectively. Irrigation frequency and amount increased the yield, and second-degree polynomial relationship was found between Y and ET (R2=0.8671). Irrigation frequency did not increase mean fruit weight, diameter and length significantly but increased fruit number, total soluble solids content (TSS), TSS yield, fruit firmness and water use efficiency (WUE) and irrigation WUE (IWUE) significantly. Irrigation amount increased external quality of tomato but reduced TSS content, TSS yield, fruit firmness, WUE and IWUE significantly. Kcp3 and Kcp4 treatments had the highest fruit yield, but Kcp2 and Kcp3 treatments had the highest WUE. I1Kcp3 treatment (irrigation interval of 2-6 d, and Kcp=0.9) had higher IWUE, WUE, external quality, yield, and TSS yield, so it is recommended as the suitable irrigation scheduling for tomato grown in solar greenhouse in North China Plain.
|
|
Received: 24 October 2012
Accepted:
|
| Fund: We acknowledge the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51009140) and the National High-Tech Program of China (2011AA100502 and 2011AA100509). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence SUN Jing-sheng, Tel: +86-373-3393384, Fax: +86-373-3393308, E-mail: jshsun623@yahoo.com.cn
E-mail: jshsun623@yahoo.com.cn
|
| About author: LIU Hao, E-mail: liuhao-914@163.com |
Cite this article:
LIU Hao, DUAN Ai-wang, LI Fu-sheng, SUN Jing-sheng, WANG Yan-cong , SUN Chi-tao.
2013.
Drip Irrigation Scheduling for Tomato Grown in Solar Greenhouse Based on Pan Evaporation in North China Plain. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(3): 520-531.
|
| [1]Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, Smith M. 1998. CropEvaporation-Guidelines for Computing Crop WaterRequirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56.Food and Agriculture Organization of the UnitedNations, Rome.[2]Branthome X Y, Ple J, Machado R, Bieche B J. 1994.Influence of drip irrigation on the technologicalcharacteristics of processing tomatoes. ActaHorticulturae, 376, 285-290[3]Bucheli P, Voirol E, de la Torre R, Lopez J, Rytz A, TanksleyS, Petiard V. 1999. Definition of nonvolatile markers forflavor of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) astools in selection and breeding. Journal of Agriculturaland Food Chemistry, 47, 659-664[4]Doorenbos J, Kassam A H. 1979. Yield response to waterirrigation-FAO irrigation and drainage. Paper 33. Foodand Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,Rome.Ertek A, Sensoy S, Gedik Ý, Küçükyumuk C. 2006a. Irrigationscheduling based pan evaporation values for cucumber(Cucumis sativus L.) grown under field conditions.Agricultural Water Management, 81, 159-172[5]Ertek A, Sensoy S, Kücükyumuk C, Gedik I. 2006b.Determination of plant-pan coefficients for field-growneggplant (Solanum melongena L.) using class A panevaporation values. Agricultural Water Management,85, 58-66[6]Hanson B R, May D M. 2006. Crop coefficients for dripirrigatedprocessing tomato. Agricultural WaterManagement, 81, 381-399[7]Hanson B R, May D M. 2004. Effect of subsurface dripirrigation on processing tomato yield, water table depth,soil salinity, and profitability. Agricultural WaterManagement, 68, 1-17[8]Hanson B R, May D M, Schwankl L J. 1997. Drip irrigationof processing tomatoes. In: ASAE Annual InternationalMeeting. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. pp. 10-14[9]Hillel D. 1998. Environmental Soil Physics. AcademicsPress, London.Ismail S M, Ozawa K, Khondaker N A. 2008. Influence ofsingle and multiple water application timings on yieldand water use efficiency in tomato (var. First power).Agricultural Water Management, 95, 116-122[10]Liu H J, Kang Y H. 2007. Sprinkler irrigation scheduling ofwinter wheat in the North China Plain using a 20 cmstandard pan. Irrigation Science, 25, 149-159[11]Locascio S J, Smajstria A G. 1996. Water applicationscheduling by pan evaporation for drip-irrigated tomato.Journal of the American Society for HroticulturalScience, 121, 63-68[12]Mahajan G, Singh K G. 2006. Response of greenhousetomato to irrigation and fertigation. Agricultural WaterManagement, 84, 202-206[13]Ozbahce A, Tari F A. 2010. Effects of different emitter spaceand water stress on yield and quality of processingtomato under semi-arid climate conditions. AgriculturalWater Management, 97, 1405-1410[14]Patanè C, Cosentino S L. 2010. Effects of soil water deficiton yield and quality of processing tomato under amediterranean climate. Agricultural WaterManagement, 97, 131-138[15]Patanè C, Tringali S, Sortino O. 2011. Effects of deficitirrigation on biomass, yield, water productivity and fruitquality of processing tomato under semi-aridMediterranean climate conditions. ScientiaHorticulturae, 129, 590-596[16]Qi H Y, Li T L, Zhang J, Wang L, Chen Y H. 2003. Effects onsucrose metabolism, dry matter distribution and fruitquality of tomato under water deficit. AgriculturalSciences in China, 2, 1253-1258[17]Sanders D C, Howell T A, Hile M M S, Hodges L, Meek D,Phene C J. 1989. Yield and quality of processingtomatoes in response to irrigation rate and schedule.Journal of the American Society for HorticulturalScience, 114, 904-908[18]Sensoy S, Ertek A, Gedik I, Kucukyumuk C. 2007. Irrigationfrequency and amount affect yield and quality of fieldgrownmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Agricultural WaterManagement, 88, 269-274[19]Sezen M S, Yazar A, Akyildiz A, Dasgan H Y, Gencel B.2008. Yield and quality response of drip irrigated greenbeans under full and deficit irrigation. ScientiaHorticulturae, 117, 95-102[20]Sezen M S, Yazar A, Eker S. 2006. Effect of drip irrigationregimes on yield and quality of field grown bell pepper.Agricultural Water Management, 81, 115-131[21]Uçan K, Kýllý F, Gençoðlan C, Merdun H. 2007. Effect ofirrigation frequency and amount on water use efficiencyand yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under fieldconditions. Field Crops Research, 101, 249-258[22]Wang D, Kang Y H, Wang S Q. 2007. Effect of soil matricpotential on tomato yield and water use under dripirrigation condition. Agricultural Water Management,87, 180-186[23]Wang F, Kang S Z, Du T S, Li F S, Qiu R J. 2011.Determination of comprehensive quality index fortomato and its response to different irrigationtreatments. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 1228-1238[24]Wang Z Y, Liu Z X, Zhang Z K, Liu X B. 2009. Subsurfacedrip irrigation scheduling for cucumber (Cucumissativus L.) grown in solar greenhouse based on 20 cmstandard pan evaporation in Northeast China. ScientiaHorticulturae, 123, 51-57[25]Yazar A, Sezen M S, Sesveren S. 2002. LEPA and trickleirrigation of cotton in the Southeast Anatolia Project(GAP) area in Turkey. Agricultural Water Management,54, 189-203[26]Yohannes F, Tadesse T. 1998. Effect of drip and furrowirrigation and plant spacing on yield of tomato at DireDawa, Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management, 35, 201-207[27]Yuan B Z , Kang Y H, Nishiyama S. 2001. Drip irrigationscheduling for tomatoes in unheated greenhouse.Irrigation Science, 20, 149-154[28]Yuan B Z, Nishiyama S, Kang Y H. 2003. Effects of differentirrigation regimes on the growth and yield of dripirrigatedpotato. Agricultural Water Management, 63,153-167[29]Yuan B Z, Sun J, Nishiyama S. 2004. Effect of drip irrigationon strawberry growth and yield inside a plasticgreenhouse. Biosystems Engineering, 87, 237-245[30]Zhang J Y, Sun J S, Duan A W, Wang J L, Shen X J, Liu XF. 2007. Effects of different planting patterns on wateruse and yield performance of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai plain of China. Agricultural WaterManagement, 92, 41-47[31]Zegbe-Domínguez J A, Behboudian M H, Lang A, ClothierB E. 2003. Deficit irrigation and partial root zone dryingmaintain fruit dry mass and enhance fruit quality in‘Petopride’ processing tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.). Agricultural Water Management, 98,505-510[32]Zeng C Z, Bie Z L, Yuan B Z. 2009. Determination of optimumirrigation water amount for drip-irrigated muskmelon(Cucumis melo L.) in plastic greenhouse. ScientiaHorticulturae, 96, 595-602 |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
