|
|
|
|
|
| Alternate Furrow Irrigation: A Practical Way to Improve Grape Quality and Water Use Efficiency in Arid Northwest China |
| DU Tai-sheng, KANG Shao-zhong, YAN Bo-yuan , ZHANG Jian-hua |
1.Center for Agricultural Water Research in China, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, P.R.China
2.School of Life Sciences and State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R.China |
|
|
|
摘要 Field experiments were conducted for two years to investigate the benefits of alternate furrow irrigation on fruit yield, quality and water use efficiency of grape (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Rizamat) in the arid region of Northwest China. Two irrigation treatments were included, i.e., conventional furrow irrigation (CFI, two root-zones were simultaneously irrigated during the consecutive irrigation) and alternate partial root-zone furrow irrigation (AFI, two root-zones were alternatively irrigated during the consecutive irrigation). Results indicate that AFI maintained similar photosynthetic rate (Pn) but with a reduced transpiration rate when compared to CFI. As a consequence, AFI improved water use efficiency based on evapotranspiration (WUEET, fruit yield over water consumed) and irrigation (WUEI, fruit yield over water irrigated) by 30.0 and 34.5%, respectively in 2005, and by 12.7 and 17.7%, respectively in 2006. AFI also increased the edible percentage of berry by 2.91-4.79% significantly in both years. Vitamin C (Vc) content content of berry was increased by 25.6-37.5%, and tritrated acidity (TA) was reduced by 9.5-18.1% in AFI. This resulted in an increased total soluble solid content (TSS) to TA ratio (TSS/TA) by 11.5-16.7% when compared to CFI in both years. Our results indicate that alternate furrow irrigation is a practical way to improve grape fruit quality and water use efficiency for irrigated crops in arid areas.
Abstract Field experiments were conducted for two years to investigate the benefits of alternate furrow irrigation on fruit yield, quality and water use efficiency of grape (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Rizamat) in the arid region of Northwest China. Two irrigation treatments were included, i.e., conventional furrow irrigation (CFI, two root-zones were simultaneously irrigated during the consecutive irrigation) and alternate partial root-zone furrow irrigation (AFI, two root-zones were alternatively irrigated during the consecutive irrigation). Results indicate that AFI maintained similar photosynthetic rate (Pn) but with a reduced transpiration rate when compared to CFI. As a consequence, AFI improved water use efficiency based on evapotranspiration (WUEET, fruit yield over water consumed) and irrigation (WUEI, fruit yield over water irrigated) by 30.0 and 34.5%, respectively in 2005, and by 12.7 and 17.7%, respectively in 2006. AFI also increased the edible percentage of berry by 2.91-4.79% significantly in both years. Vitamin C (Vc) content content of berry was increased by 25.6-37.5%, and tritrated acidity (TA) was reduced by 9.5-18.1% in AFI. This resulted in an increased total soluble solid content (TSS) to TA ratio (TSS/TA) by 11.5-16.7% when compared to CFI in both years. Our results indicate that alternate furrow irrigation is a practical way to improve grape fruit quality and water use efficiency for irrigated crops in arid areas.
|
|
Received: 29 October 2012
Accepted:
|
| Fund: Thanks to the research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51222905, 51079147 and 50939005), the National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program, 2011AA100502), the Program of New Century Excellent Talents in University, Ministry of Education of China (NCET-11-0479) and Hong Kong Research Grants Council, China (HKBU 262307). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence DU Tai-sheng, Tel: +86-10-62738548, Fax: +86-10-62737611, E-mail: dutaisheng@cau.edu.cn
E-mail: dutaisheng@cau.edu.cn
|
Cite this article:
DU Tai-sheng, KANG Shao-zhong, YAN Bo-yuan , ZHANG Jian-hua.
2013.
Alternate Furrow Irrigation: A Practical Way to Improve Grape Quality and Water Use Efficiency in Arid Northwest China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(3): 509-519.
|
| [1]Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, Smith M. 1998. CropEvaporation-Guidelines for Computing Crop WaterRequirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56.Food and Agriculture Organization of the UnitedNations, Rome.AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed.Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Washington, D.C.[2]Bravdo B, Naor A, Zahavi T, Gal Y. 2004. The effect ofwater stress applied alternately to part of the wettingzone along the season (PRD-partial rootzone drying) on wine quality, yield and water relations of red winegrapes. Acta Horticulture, 664, 101-109[3]Chaves M M, Santos T P, Souza C R, Ortuño M F,Rodrigues M L, Lopes C M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S.2007. Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water-useefficiency while controlling vigour and productionquality. Annals of Applied Biology, 150, 237-252[4]Cowan I R. 1988. Stomata behavior and environment.Advance of Botany Research, 4, 117-228[5]Davies W J, Bacon M A, Thompson D S. 2000. Regulationof leaf and fruit growth in plants growing in drying soil:exploitation of the plants’ chemical signalling systemand hydraulic architecture to increase the efficiency ofwater use in agriculture. Journal of ExperimentalBotany, 51, 1617-1626[6]Davies W J, Zhang J. 1991. Root signals and the regulationof growth and development of plants in drying soil.Annual Review of Plant Physiology and PlantMolecular Biology, 42, 55-76[7]Dry P R, Loveys B R. 1998. Factors influencing grapevinevigour and the potential for control with partial rootzonedrying. Australian Journal of Grape WineResearch, 4, 140-148[8]Dry P R, Loveys B R, Botting D, Düring H. 1996. Effect ofpartial root-zone drying on grapevine vigour, yield,composition of fruit and use of water. In: Proceedingsof the Ninth Australian Wine Industry TechnicalConference. Winetitles, Australia. pp. 126-131[9]Dry P R, Loveys B R, Düring H. 2000a. Partial drying of theroot-zone of grape. I. Transient changes in shootgrowth and gas exchange. Vitis, 39, 3-7[10]Dry P R, Loveys B R, Düring H. 2000b. Partial drying of theroot-zone of grape. II. Changes in the pattern of rootdevelopment. Vitis, 39, 3-7[11]Dry P R, Loveys B R, McCarthy M G, Stoll M. 2001.Strategic irrigation management in Australianvineyards. Journal International des Sciences de laVigne et du vin, 35, 129-139[12]Du T S, Kang S Z, Zhang J, Yang X Y. 2006. Effects ofdifferent furrow irrigation modes on grape growth andwater use in oasis region. Chinese Journal of AppliedEcology, 17, 805-810 (in Chinese)[13]Du T S, Kang S Z, Zhang J H, Li F S, Yan B Y 2008. Wateruse efficiency and fruit quality of table grape underalternate partial root-zone drip irrigation. AgriculturalWater Management, 95, 659-668[14]Girona J, Mata M, Campo J, Arbone’s A, Bartra E, Marsal J.2006. The use of midday leaf water potential forscheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards. IrrigationScience, 24, 115-127[15]Goodwin I, Jerie P. 1992. Regulated deficit irrigation: fromconcept to practice. The Australian and New ZealandWine Industry Journal, 5, 131-133[16]Gu S, Du G, Zoldoske D, Hakim A, Cochran R, FugelsangK, Jorgensen G. 2004. Effects of irrigation amount onwater relations, vegetative growth, yield and fruitcomposition of Sauvignon blanc grapevines underpartial root-zone drying and conventional irrigation inthe San Joaquin Valley of California, USA. Journal ofHorticulture Science Biotechnology, 79, 26-33[17]Hera M L, Romero P, Gomez-Plaza E, Martinez A. 2007. Ispartial root-zone drying an effective irrigation techniqueto improve water use efficiency and fruit quality in fieldgrownwine grapes under semiarid conditions?Agricultural Water Management, 87, 261-274[18]Hutton R J, Loveys B R. 2011. A partial root zone dryingirrigation strategy for citrus - Effects on water useefficiency and fruit characteristics. Agricultural WaterManagement, 98, 1485-1496[19]Intrigliolo D S, Castel J R. 2009. Response of Vitis viniferacv. ‘Tempranillo’ to partial rootzone drying in the field:Water relations, growth, yield and fruit and wine quality.Agricultural Water Management, 96, 282-292[20]Jensen C R, Battilani A, Plauborg F, Psarras G, ChartzoulakisK, Janowiak F, Stikic R, Jovanovic Z, Li G, Qi X, et al.2010. Deficit irrigation based on drought tolerance androot signalling in potatoes and tomatoes. AgriculturalWater Management, 98, 403-413[21]Jones H G. 1998. Stomatal control of photosynthesis andtranspiration. Journal of Experimental Botany, 49(special issue), 387-398[22]Kang S Z, Zhang J H. 2004. Controlled alternate partialroot-zone irrigation: its physiological consequencesand impact on water use efficiency. Journal ofExperimental Botany, 55, 2437-2446[23]Kriedemann P E, Goodwin I. 2003. Regulated DeficitIrrigation and Partial Root-zone Drying. An Overviewof Principles and Applications. Irrigation Insights No.4. Land Water, Australia.Leib B G, Caspari H W, Redulla C A, Andrews P K, Jabro JJ. 2006. Partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation of‘Fuji’ apples in a semi-arid climate. Irrigation Science,24, 85-99[24]Liu M C, Zhang F, Jiang J F, Wei Y G. 2006. Influence ofclimate resources on wine grape along desert area inHexi Corridor. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas,24, 143-148[25]Loveys B R. 2000. Using plant physiology to improve thewater use efficiency of horticultural crops. ActaHorticulturae, 537, 187-197[26]Loveys B R, Stoll M, Dry P R, McCarthy M. 1998. Partialroot-zone drying stimulates stress responses ingrapevine to improve water use efficiency whilemaintaining crop yield and quality. AustralianGrapegrower and Winemaker, 414(technical issue),108-114[27]Marsal J, Mata M, Campo J, Arbones A, Vallverdú X, GironaJ, Olivo N. 2008. Evaluation of partial root-zone dryingfor potential field use as a deficit irrigation technique incommercial vineyards according to two different pipelinelayouts. Irrigation Science, 26, 347-356[28]McCarthy M G, Loveys B R, Dry P R. 2000. Regulated deficit irrigation and partial root-zone drying as irrigationmanagement techniques for grapevines. In: DeficitIrrigation Practices. Water Reports Publication n.22.FAO, Rome. pp. 79-87[29]Mingo D M, Theobald J C, Bacon M A, Davies W J, DoddI C. 2004. Biomass allocation in tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum) plants grown under partial root-zonedrying: enhancement of root growth. Functional PlantBiology, 31, 971-978[30]Rana G, Katerji N, Introna M, Hammami A. 2004.Microclimate and plant water relationship of the“overhead” table grape vineyard managed with threedifferent covering techniques. Scientia Horticulturae,102, 105-120[31]Robinson J. 2006. The Oxford Companion to Wine. 3rd ed.Oxford University Press, UK. pp. 317-324, 397[32]Sadras V O. 2009. Does partial root-zone drying improveirrigation water productivity in the field? A metaanalysis.Irrigation Science, 27, 183-190[33]Santos T P, Lopes C M, Rodrigues M L, Souza C R, Ricardoda-Silva J M, Maroco J P, Pereira J S, Chaves M M.2007. Effects of deficit irrigation strategies on clustermicroclimate for improving fruit composition ofMoscatel field-grown grapevines. ScientiaHorticulturae, 112, 321-330[34]Santos T P, Lopes C M, Rodrigues M L, Souza C R, MarocoJ P, Pereira J S, Silva J R, Chaves M M. 2003. Partialroot-zone drying: effects on growth and fruit quality offield-grown grapevines (Vitis vinifera). FunctionalPlant Biology, 30, 663-671[35]Santos T P, Lopes C M, Rodrígues M L, Souza C R, Ricardo-Da-Silva J M, Maroco J P. 2005. Effects of partial rootzonedrying irrigation on cluster microclimate and fruitcomposition of field-grow Castelão grapevines. Vitis,44, 117-125[36]Sauter A, Davis W J, Hartung W. 2001. The long-distanceabscisic acid signal in the droughted plant: the fate ofthe hormone on its way from root to shoot. Journal ofExperimental Botany, 52, 1991-1997[37]Sharp R E, LeNoble M E. 2002. ABA, ethylene and thecontrol of shoot and root growth under water stress.Journal of Experimental Botany, 53, 33-37[38]Sharp R E, LeNoble M E, Else M A, Thorne E T, Gherardi F.2000. Endogenous ABA maintains shoot growth intomato independently of effects on plant water balance:evidence for an interaction with ethylene. Journal ofExperimental Botany, 51, 1575-1584[39]Souza C R, Maroco J P, Santos T P, Rodrigues M L, LopesC M, Pereira J S, Chaves M M. 2005a. Control of stomatalaperture and carbon uptake by deficit irrigation in twograpevines cultivars. Agriculture, Ecosystems andEnvironment, 106, 261-274[40]Souza C R, Maroco J P, Santos T P, Rodrigues M L, LopesC M, Pereira J S, Chaves M M. 2005b. Impact of deficitirrigation on water use efficiency and carbon isotopecomposition (d13) of field-grown grapevines underMediterranean climate. Journal of ExperimentalBotany, 56, 2163-2172[41]Spreer W, Nagle M, Neidhart S, Carle R, Ongprasert S,Müller J. 2007. Effect of regulated deficit irrigation andpartial rootzone drying on the quality of mango fruits(Mangifera indica L. cv. ‘Chok Anan’). AgriculturalWater Management, 88, 173-180[42]Stikic R, Popovic S, Srdic M, Savic D, Jovanovic Z, ProkicL J, Zdravkovic J. 2003. Partial root drying (PRD): a newtechnique for growing plants that saves water andimproves the quality of fruit. Bulgarian Journal of PlantPhysiology, Special Issue, 164-171[43]Stoll M, Loveys B R, Dry P R. 2000. Hormonal changesinduced by partial root-zone drying of irrigatedgrapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 1627-1634[44]Zegbe J A, Alfonso S P. 2011. Partial root-zone dryingmaintains fruit quality of ‘Golden Delicious’ apples atharvest and postharvest. Scientia Horticulturae, 127,455-459. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
