|
|
|
Optimization of Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis for Kenaf Leaf Proteins |
CHEN Tao, QI Jian-min, XU Jian-tang, CHEN Pin-pin, TAO Ai-fen, CHEN Fu-cheng , CHEN Wei |
1.Key Laboratory for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, Ministry of Education/Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002, P.R.China |
|
|
摘要 To establish a suitable and effective protocol of protein extraction for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) analysis in kenaf leaf tissues, three extraction methods (trichloroacetic acid/acetone, urea/thiourea, and phenol extraction methods) were applied to the extraction of kenaf leaf protein. The results were compared in regard to protein extraction efficiency, sodiumdodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and 2-DE gels. Furthermore, the 2-DE system was optimized for four aspects: the pH range of IPG (immobilized pH gradient) stripes, sampling methods, sample volumes, and concentration of polyacrylamide gels. The data presented showed that the phenol extraction method is the best method to perform 2-DE analysis of kenaf leaf protein. The protein extracted from phenol extraction method reached the purity of (26.40±0.859)%, showed (25.67±1.53) protein bands in one dimension SDS-PAGE gels, and (1 374±54.44) protein spots on 2-DE gels. The research also indicates that kenaf leaf protein spots were distributed mainly within the pH range of 4-8. More clear background with a better distribution effect and many protein spots could be obtained on 2-DE gels under the conditions of active rehydration loading, 24 cm IPG strips (linear pH gradient of 4-7), 1.4 mg samples, and 12% SDS-PAGE gels.
Abstract To establish a suitable and effective protocol of protein extraction for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) analysis in kenaf leaf tissues, three extraction methods (trichloroacetic acid/acetone, urea/thiourea, and phenol extraction methods) were applied to the extraction of kenaf leaf protein. The results were compared in regard to protein extraction efficiency, sodiumdodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and 2-DE gels. Furthermore, the 2-DE system was optimized for four aspects: the pH range of IPG (immobilized pH gradient) stripes, sampling methods, sample volumes, and concentration of polyacrylamide gels. The data presented showed that the phenol extraction method is the best method to perform 2-DE analysis of kenaf leaf protein. The protein extracted from phenol extraction method reached the purity of (26.40±0.859)%, showed (25.67±1.53) protein bands in one dimension SDS-PAGE gels, and (1 374±54.44) protein spots on 2-DE gels. The research also indicates that kenaf leaf protein spots were distributed mainly within the pH range of 4-8. More clear background with a better distribution effect and many protein spots could be obtained on 2-DE gels under the conditions of active rehydration loading, 24 cm IPG strips (linear pH gradient of 4-7), 1.4 mg samples, and 12% SDS-PAGE gels.
|
Received: 17 September 2010
Accepted:
|
Fund: This work was supported by the Project of Fiber Crops Industrial System Construction in China (nycytx-19- E05), the Natural Public Welfare Sector Projects of China (nyhyzx07-018), and the Transformation Program of Agricultural Science and Technology Achievements in China (20dnfq2c400170). |
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence QI Jian-min, Tel/Fax: +86-591-87644898, E-mail: qijm863@163.com; CHEN Wei, Tel: +86-591-83789367, Fax: +86-591-83789352, E-mail: weichen909@163.com
E-mail: qijm863@163.com
|
Cite this article:
CHEN Tao, QI Jian-min, XU Jian-tang, CHEN Pin-pin, TAO Ai-fen, CHEN Fu-cheng , CHEN Wei.
2011.
Optimization of Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis for Kenaf Leaf Proteins. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10(12): 1842-1850.
|
[1]Abbasi F M, Komatsu S. 2004. A proteomic approach to analyze salt-responsive proteins in rice leaf sheath. Proteomics, 4, 2072-2081. [2]Blomberg A, Norbeck J, Fey S J, Larsen P M, Larsen M, Roepstorff P, Degand H, Boutry M, Posch A, Gorg A, et al. 1995. Interlaboratory reproducibility of yeast protein patterns analyzed by immobilized pH gradient twodimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 16, 1935-1945. [3]Bjellqvist B, Sanchez J C, Pasquali C, Ravier F, Paquet N, Frutiger S, Hughes G J, Hochstrasser D. 1993. Micropreparative twodimensional electrophoresis allowing the separation of samples containing milligram amounts of proteins. Electrophoresis, 14, 1375-1378. [4]Bradford M M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248-254. [5]Carpentier S C, Witters E, Laukens K, Deckers P, Swennen R, Panis B. 2005. Preparation of protein extracts from recalcitrant plant tissues: an evaluation of different methods for twodimensional gel electrophoresis analysis. Proteomics, 5, 2497-2507. [6]FAO. 2003. The production and consumption of kenaf in China. Consultation on Natural Fibres. ESC-Fibres Consultation no. 03/6. Salvador, Brazil. Flengsrud R, Kobro G . 1989. A method for two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins from green plant tissues. Analytical Biochemistry, 177, 33-36. [7]Görg A, Postel W, Weser J, Guenther S, Strahler J R, Hanash S M, Somerlot L. 1987. Elimination of point streaking on sliver stained two-dimensional gels by addition of iodoacetamide to the equilibration buffer. Electrophoresis, 8, 122-124. [8]Granier F. 1988. Extraction of plant proteins for two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 9, 712-718. [9]Laemmli U K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227, 680-685. [10]LeMahieu P J, Oplinger E S, Putnam D H. 2003. Kenaf. In: Alternative Field Crops Manual. University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension; University of Minnesota, Center for Alternative Plant & Animal Products and the Minnesota Extension Service. Maldonado A M, Echevarría-Zomeño S, Jean-Baptiste S, Hernández M, Jorrín-Novo J V. 2008. Evaluation of three different protocols of protein extraction for Arabidopsis thaliana leaf proteome analysis by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Journal of Proteomics, 71, 461-472. [11]Matsui N M, Smith D M, Clauser K R, Fichmann J, Andrews L E, Sullivan C M, Burlingame A L, Epstein L B. 1997. Immobilized pH gradient two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometric identification of cytokine-regulated proteins in ME-180 cervical carcinoma cells. Electrophoresis, 18, 409-417. [12]O’Farrell P H.1975.High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 250, 4007-4021. [13]Qi J M, Fang P P, Xu J T, Lin L H, Wu J M. 2007. High efficient utilization of jute/kenaf biomass and construction of industrial zone for territorial development. Plant Fiber Sciences in China, 29, 57-63. (in Chinese) [14]Rabilloud T. 1998. Use of thiourea to increase the solubility of membrane proteins in two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 19, 758-760. [15]Sanchez J C, Rouge V, Pisteur M, Ravier F, Tonella L, Moosmayer M, Wilkins M R, Hochstrasser D F. 1997. Improved and simplified in-gel sample application using reswelling of dry immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis, 18, 324-327. [16]Shen S H, Matsubae M, Takao T, Tanaka N, Komatsu S. 2002. A proteomic analysis of leaf sheaths from rice. The Journal of Biochemistry, 132, 613-620. [17]Sheoran I S, Olson D J H, Ross A R S, Sawhney V K. 2005. Proteome analysis of embryo and endosperm from germinating tomato seeds. Proteomic, 5, 3752-3764. [18]Sheoran I S, Ross A R S, Olson D J H, Sawhney V K. 2009. Compatibility of plant protein extraction methods with mass spectrometry for proteome analysis. Plant Science, 176, 99-104. [19]Tsugita A, Kawakami T, Uchiyama Y, Kamo M, Miyatake N, Nozu Y. 1994. Separation and characterization of rice proteins. Electrophoresis, 15, 708-720. [20]Wang D Z, Lin L, Chan L L, Hong H S. 2009. Comparative studies of four protein preparation methods for proteomic study of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium sp. using twodimensional electrophoresis. Harmful Algae, 8, 685-691. [21]Wilkins M R, Sanchez J C, Gooley A A, Appel R D, Humphery-Smith I, Hochstrasser D F, Williams K L. 1996. Progress with proteome projects: Why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews, 13, 19-50. [22]Zhong B, Karibe H, Komatsu S, Ichimura H, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T, Hirano H. 1997. Screening of rice genes from a cDNA catalog based on the sequence date-file of proteins separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Breed Science, 47, 245-251. [23]Zukas A A, Breksa A P. 2005. Extraction methods for analysis of Citrus leaf proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatography (A), 1078, 201-205. |
No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|