|
|
|
|
|
| Changes of Soil Microbiological Characteristics After Solidago canadensis L. Invasion |
| Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Subtropical Soil and Plant Nutrition/Department of Resources Science, College of Environmental and Resources Sciences, Zhejiang University |
|
|
|
摘要 The relationship between Solidago canadensis L. invasion and soil microbial communities was studied across the invasivegradients varying from 0 to 40, 80, and 100% coverage of S. canadensis. The results showed both soil microbial biomassC (Cmic) and N (Nmic) increased as the coverage of S. canadensis increased. Soil microbial quotient Cmic/Corg (microbialbiomass C/organic C) tended to increase linearly with the coverage of S. canadensis. Soil basal respiration (BR) alsoshowed a similar trend. The soil respiratory quotient qCO2 decreased with S. canadensis invasion, and remained at quitea constantly low level in the invasive soils. Sole carbon source utilization profiles analyses indicated that S. canadensisinvasion tended to result in higher microbial functional diversity in the soil. Average utilization of specific substrateguilds was highest in the soil with S. canadensis monoculture. Principle component analysis of sole carbon sourceutilization profiles further indicated that microbial functional diversity in the soil with S. canadensis monoculture wasdistinctly separated from those soils in the native area and the ecotones. In conclusion, S. canadensis invasion improvedsoil microbial biomass, respiration and utilization of carbon sources, and decreased qCO2, thus created better soil conditions,which in turn were more conducive to the growth of S. canadensis.
Abstract The relationship between Solidago canadensis L. invasion and soil microbial communities was studied across the invasivegradients varying from 0 to 40, 80, and 100% coverage of S. canadensis. The results showed both soil microbial biomassC (Cmic) and N (Nmic) increased as the coverage of S. canadensis increased. Soil microbial quotient Cmic/Corg (microbialbiomass C/organic C) tended to increase linearly with the coverage of S. canadensis. Soil basal respiration (BR) alsoshowed a similar trend. The soil respiratory quotient qCO2 decreased with S. canadensis invasion, and remained at quitea constantly low level in the invasive soils. Sole carbon source utilization profiles analyses indicated that S. canadensisinvasion tended to result in higher microbial functional diversity in the soil. Average utilization of specific substrateguilds was highest in the soil with S. canadensis monoculture. Principle component analysis of sole carbon sourceutilization profiles further indicated that microbial functional diversity in the soil with S. canadensis monoculture wasdistinctly separated from those soils in the native area and the ecotones. In conclusion, S. canadensis invasion improvedsoil microbial biomass, respiration and utilization of carbon sources, and decreased qCO2, thus created better soil conditions,which in turn were more conducive to the growth of S. canadensis.
|
|
Received: 24 August 2010
Accepted:
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence LIAO Min, Associate Professor, Tel/Fax: +86-571-88982069, E-mail: liaominzju@163.com
|
Cite this article:
LIAO Min, XIE Xiao-mei, PENG Ying, MA Ai-li.
2011.
Changes of Soil Microbiological Characteristics After Solidago canadensis L. Invasion. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 10(7): 1064-1071.
|
| [1] Amato M, Ladd J N. 1988. Assay for microbial biomass basedon ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen in extracts of fumigated soils.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 20, 107-114.[2] Anderson T H, Domsch K H. 1990. Application ofecophysiological quotients (qCO2 and qD) on microbialbiomass from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biology& Biochemistry, 22, 251-255.[3] Bremner J M, Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: Page A L,Miller R H, Keeney D R, eds., Methods of Soil Analysis, Part2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties (Agronomy).American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. pp.595-624.[4] Callaway R M, Newingham B, Zabinski C A, Mahall B E. 2001.Compensatory growth and competitive ability of an invasiveweed are enhanced by soil fungi and nativeneighbors. EcologyLetters, 4, 1-5.[5] Callaway R M, Thelen G C, Rodriguez A, Holben W E. 2004.Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature, 427, 731-733.[6] Campbell C D, Grayston S J, Hirst D J. 1997. Use of rhizospherecarbon sources in sole carbon source tests to discriminatesoil microbial communities. Journal of MicrobiologicalMethods, 30, 33-41.[7] Duda J J, Freeman D C, Emlen J M, Belnap J, Kitchen S G, ZakJ C, Sobek E, Tracy M, Montante J. 2003. Differences innative soil ecology associated with invasion of the exoticannual chenopod, Halogeton glomeratus. Biology andFertility of Soils, 38, 72-77.[8] Ehrenfeld J G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soilnutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems, 6, 503-523.[9] Flieâbach A, Mäder P. 1996. Carbon source utilization bymicrobial communities in soils under organic and conventionalfarming practice. In: Insam H, Rangger A, eds., MicrobialCommunities: Functional Versus Structural Approaches.Springer, Berlin, Germany. pp. 109-120.[10] Frey B, Stemmer M, Widmer F, Luster J, Sperisen C. 2006.Microbial activity and community structure of a soil afterheavy metal contamination in a model forest ecosystem. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 38, 1745-1756.[11] Garland J L, Mills A L. 1991. Classification and characterizationof heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis ofpatterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization.Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57, 2351-2359.[12] Garland J L. 1996. Patterns of potential C source utilization byrhizosphere communities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28,223-230.[13] Giller K, Witter E, McGrath S P. 1998. Toxicity of heavy metalsto microorganisms and microbial processes in agriculturalsoils: a review. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 30, 1389-1414.[14] Grayston S J, Griffth G S, Mawdsley J L, Campbell C D,Bardgett R D. 2001. Accounting for variability in soil microbialcommunities of temperate upland grassland ecosystems. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 33, 533-551.[15] Guo S L, Fang F. 2003. Physiological adaptation of the invasiveplant Solidago canadadensis to environments. ActaPhytoecologica Sinica, 27, 47-52. (in Chinese)[16] Heuer H, Smalla K. 1997. Evaluation of community-level catabolicprofiling using Biolog-GN microplates to study microbialcommunity changes in potato phyllosphere. Journal ofMicrobiological Methods, 30, 49-61.[17] Kelly J J, Häggblom M, Tate R L III. 1999. Changes in soilmicrobial communities over time resulting from one timeapplication of zinc: a laboratory microcosm study. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 31, 1455-1456.[18] Khan S, Cao Q, Hesham A E L, Xia Y, He J Z. 2007. Journal ofEnvironmental Science, 19, 834-840.[19] Khan S, Hesham A E L, Qiao M, He J Z. 2009. Effects of Cd andPb on soil microbial community structure and activities.Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 17, 288-296.[20] Klironomos J N. 2002. Feedback with soil biota contributes toplant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature, 417,67-70.[21] Kourtev P S, Ehrenfeld J G, Häggblom M. 2002. Exotic plantspecies alter the microbial community structure and functionin the soil. Ecology, 83, 3152-3166.[22] Kourtev P S, Ehrenfeld J G, Häggblom M. 2003. Experimentalanalysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species onthe structure and function of soil microbial communities. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 35, 895-905.[23] Liao M, Xie X M. 2007. Effect of heavy metals on substrateutilization pattern, biomass and activity of microbialcommunities in a reclaimed mining wasteland of red soil area.Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 66, 217-223.[24] Marler M M, Zabinski C A, Callaway R M. 1999. Mycorrhizaeindirectly enhance competitive effects of an invasive forb ona native bunchgrass. Ecology, 80, 1180-1186.[25] Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbonand organic matter. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R,eds., Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2: Chemical andMicrobiological Properties (Agronomy). American Societyof Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 539-579.[26] Odum E P. 1985. Trends expected in stressed ecosystems.Bioscience, 35, 419-422.[27] Sparling G P. 1992. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soilorganic matter carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes insoil organic matter. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 30, 195-207.[28] Vance E D, Brookes P C, Jenkinson D S. 1987. An extractionmethod for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology& Biochemistry, 19, 703-707.[29] Waldrop M, Balser T, Firestone M. 2000. Linking microbialcommunity composition to function in a tropical soil. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 32, 1837-1846.[30] Wang Y P, Shi J Y, Wang H, Lin Q, Chen X C, Chen Y X. 2007.The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbialbiomass, enzyme activity, and community composition neara copper smelter. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,67, 75-81.[31] Wardle D A, Ghani A. 1995. A critique of the microbial metabolicquotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator of disturbance andecosystem development. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 27,1601-1610.[32] Widmer F A, Flieâbach E, Laczko J, Zeyer J. 2001. Assessingsoil biological characteristics: a comparison of bulk soilcommunity DNA-, PLFA-, and BIOLOG-analyses. SoilBiology & Biochemistry, 33, 1029-1036.[33] Wolfe B E, Klironomos J N. 2005. Breaking new ground: soilcommunities and exotic plant invasion. Bioscience, 55, 477-487.[34] Wu J, Joergensen R G, Pommerening B, Chaussod R, Brookes PC. 1990. Measurement of soil microbial biomass-C byfumigation-extraction - an automated procedure. Soil Biology& Biochemistry, 22, 1167-1169.[35] Yu X J, Yu D, Lu Z J, Ma K P. 2005. A new mechanism of invadersuccess: exotic plant inhibits natural vegetation restorationby changing soil microbe community. Chinese Science Bulletin,50, 1105-1112.[36] Zak J C, Willig M R, Moorhead D L, Wildman H G.1994.Functional diversity of microbial communities: a quantitativeapproach. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 26, 1101-1108.[37] Zhang S S, Jin Y L, Tang J J, Chen X. 2009. The invasive plantSolidago canadensis L. suppresses local soil pathogensthrough allelopathy. Applied Soil Ecology, 41, 215-222. |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
