Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2012, Vol. 12 Issue (10): 1654-1664    DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(00)8698
PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY · TILLAGE · CULTIVATION Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Seed Zone Properties and Crop Performance as Affected by Three No-Till Seeders for Permanent Raised Beds in Arid Northwest China
 HE Jin, LI Hong-wen, Allen David McHugh, WANG Qing-jie, LI Hui, Rabi Gautam Rasaily, Khokan Kumer Sarker
1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Optimized Design for Modern Agricultural Equipment/College of Engineering, China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083, P.R.China
2.National Center for Engineering in Agriculture, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba Queensland 4350, Australia
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  The no-till seeders of various soil opener configurations have been shown to produce various soil physical responses in relation to soil and climate conditions, thus affecting crop performance in permanent raised beds (PRB) systems. This is particularly important in arid Northwest China where large volumes of residue are retained on the soil surface after harvest. In Zhangye, Gansu Province, China, a field trial assessed the effects of three typical (powered-chopper, powered-cutter and powered-disc) PRB no-till seeders and one traditional seeder on soil disturbance, residue cover index, bulk density, fuel consumption, plant growth, and subsequent yield. In general, seedbed conditions and crop performance for PRB notill seeders seeded plots were better than for traditional seeded plots. In PRB cropping system, the powered-chopper seeder decreased mean soil disturbance and increased residue cover index compared to powered-disc and -cutter seeders. However, the results indicated that soil bulk density was 2.3-4.8% higher, soil temperature was 0.2-0.6°C lower, and spring wheat emergence was 3.2-4.7% less. This was attributed to greater levels of residue cover and firmer seedbeds. Spring maize and wheat performance in the powered-cutter and -disc treatments was better (non-significant) than poweredchopper treatment. So powered disc no-till seeder, which generally provided the best planting condition and the highest yield, appeared to be the suitable seeder in heavy residue cover conditions. Considering the precision requirements for soil disturbance and residue cover, the powered strip-chopping no-till seeder could be a suitable option for PRB cropping system in Northwest China. Although these results are preliminary, they are still valuable for the design and selection of no-till seeders for PRB cropping systems in arid Northwest China.

Abstract  The no-till seeders of various soil opener configurations have been shown to produce various soil physical responses in relation to soil and climate conditions, thus affecting crop performance in permanent raised beds (PRB) systems. This is particularly important in arid Northwest China where large volumes of residue are retained on the soil surface after harvest. In Zhangye, Gansu Province, China, a field trial assessed the effects of three typical (powered-chopper, powered-cutter and powered-disc) PRB no-till seeders and one traditional seeder on soil disturbance, residue cover index, bulk density, fuel consumption, plant growth, and subsequent yield. In general, seedbed conditions and crop performance for PRB notill seeders seeded plots were better than for traditional seeded plots. In PRB cropping system, the powered-chopper seeder decreased mean soil disturbance and increased residue cover index compared to powered-disc and -cutter seeders. However, the results indicated that soil bulk density was 2.3-4.8% higher, soil temperature was 0.2-0.6°C lower, and spring wheat emergence was 3.2-4.7% less. This was attributed to greater levels of residue cover and firmer seedbeds. Spring maize and wheat performance in the powered-cutter and -disc treatments was better (non-significant) than poweredchopper treatment. So powered disc no-till seeder, which generally provided the best planting condition and the highest yield, appeared to be the suitable seeder in heavy residue cover conditions. Considering the precision requirements for soil disturbance and residue cover, the powered strip-chopping no-till seeder could be a suitable option for PRB cropping system in Northwest China. Although these results are preliminary, they are still valuable for the design and selection of no-till seeders for PRB cropping systems in arid Northwest China.
Keywords:  no-till seeder       permanent raised beds       crop growth       seedbed       yield  
Received: 15 August 2011   Accepted: 12 November 2012
Fund: 

This work was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51175499), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China (6112015) and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence LI Hong-wen, Tel/Fax: +86-10-62737631, E-mail: lhwen@cau.edu.cn     E-mail:  lhwen@cau.edu.cn

Cite this article: 

HE Jin, LI Hong-wen, Allen David McHugh, WANG Qing-jie, LI Hui, Rabi Gautam Rasaily, Khokan Kumer Sarker. 2012. Seed Zone Properties and Crop Performance as Affected by Three No-Till Seeders for Permanent Raised Beds in Arid Northwest China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(10): 1654-1664.

[1]GB/T 20865-2007. 2007. No-tillage fertile-seeding dirll.General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic ofChina, Standardization Administration of the People’sRepublic of China.ChaudhryAD, Baker C J. 1988. Barley seeding establishmentby direct drilling in black soil. 1. Effect of openers undersimulated rainfall and high water table conditions. Soiland Tillage Research, 11, 43-61.

[2]Choudhury B U, Bouman B M, Sigh A K. 2007. Yield andwater productivity of rice-wheat on raised beds at NewDelhi, India. Field Crops Research, 100, 229-239.

[3]Connor R J, Timsina J, Humphreys E. 2003. Prospects forpermanent beds in the rice-wheat system. In: Improvingthe Productivity and Sustainability of Rice-Wheat System:Issues and Impacts. American Society of Agronomy,Crop Science Society of America, and Soil ScienceSociety of America, Charlotte, NC, USA. pp. 197-210.

[4]Du B. 1999. Research on conservation tillage system for .2012, CAAS. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.winter wheat production in dryland in northern China.In: Agricultural Engineering for the 21st Century.Proceedings of 99-ICAE. China Agricultural UniversityPress, Beijing, China.He J, Li H W, Kuhn N J, Zhang X M, Li W Y. 2007. Soilloosening on permanent raised-beds in arid northwestChina. Soil and Tillage Research, 97, 172-183.

[5]He J, Li H W, Li H, Zhang X M, Zhang X R. 2009. No-tillplanter with reciprocating powered-cutter for wheatpermanent raised beds cultivation. Transactions of theChinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 11, 133-138. (in Chinese)

[6]He J, Li H W, McHugh A D, Ma Z M, Cao X H, Wang Q J,Zhang XM, Zhang X R. 2008. Spring wheat performanceand water use efficiency on permanent raised beds inarid northwest China. Australian Journal of SoilResearch, 46, 659-666.

[7]He J, Li H W, Rabi G R, Wang Q J. 2011. Soil properties andcrop yields after 11 years of no tillage farming in wheatmaizecropping system in North China Plain. Soil andTillage Research, 113, 48-54.

[8]Holland J E,White R E, Edis R. 2007. The relation between soilstructure and solute transport under raised bed croppingand conventional cultivation in south-western Victoria.Australian Journal of Soil Research, 45, 577-585.

[9]Huang Y L, Chen L D, Fu B J, Huang Z L, Gong J. 2005. Thewheat yields and water-use efficiency in the LoessPlateau: straw mulch and irrigation effect. AgriculturalWater Management, 72, 209-222.

[10]Kang S Z, Shi P, Pan Y H, Liang Z S, Hu X T, Zhang J. 2000.Soil water distribution, uniformity and water-useefficiency under alternate furrow irrigation in arid areas.Irrigation Science, 19, 181-190.

[11]Kukal S S, Humphreys E, Yadvinder S, Timsina J, Thaman S.2005. Performance of raised beds in rice-wheat systemsof northwestern India. In: Proceedings of the AustralianCentre for International Agricultural Research. No.121. CSIRO Land & Water. Griffith, New South Wales,Australia. pp. 26-40.

[12]Kushwaha R L, Foster R K. 1993. Field evaluation of graindrill furrow openers and press wheels for no till seeding.Canadian Agricultural Engineering, 35, 253-257.

[13]Li T W, Li H W, He J. 2008. Design of 2BMF-5 type no-tillwheat planter in ridge-field. Journal of AgriculturalMechanization Research, 10, 50-53. (in Chinese)

[14]Ma H L. 2006. Study on the cutting corn stalk and rootstalkdevice of no tillage drill. Ph D thesis, China AgriculturalUniversity, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)

[15]Mao S C, Song M Z, Zhang C J, Han Y C, Xing J S, ZhuangJ N. 1998. Studies on the effects of soil temperature incotton fields in the wheat and cotton co-growing periodunder a double cropping system in the HuanghuaihaiPlains. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 31, 1-5. (in Chinese)

[16]McHugh AD, Tullberg J N, Freebairn D M. 2009. Controlledtraffic farming restores soil structure. Soil and TillageResearch, 104, 164-172.

[17]Murray J R, Tullberg J N, Basnet B B. 2006. Planters andTheir Components. Australian Centre for InternationalAgricultural Research, Canberra. ACIAR MonographNo. 121. Australia.Oades J M, Waters A G. 1991. Aggregate hierarchy in soils.Australian Journal of Soil Research, 29, 815-828.

[18]Serrano J M, Peca J Q, Pinheiro A, Carvalho M, Nunes M,Ribeiro L, Santos F. 2003. The effect of gang angle ofoffset disc harrows on soil till, work rate and fuelconsumption. Biosystems Engineering, 84, 171-176.

[19]Singh B, Humphreys E, Eberbach P L, Katupitiya A, SinghY, Kukal S S. 2011. Growth, yield and water productivityof zero till wheat as affected by rice straw mulch andirrigation schedule. Field Crops Research, 121, 209-225.

[20]Singh Y. 2003. Crop residue management in rice-wheatsystem. In: RWCCIMMYT. Addressing ResourceConservation Issues in Rice-Wheat Systems of SouthAsia: A Resource Book. Rice-Wheat Consortium forthe Indo-Gangetic Plains-CIMMYT, New Delhi.

[21]Sun R R, Li W Y, Li H W. 2008. Design and experiment onpower driven rootstalk cutting mechanism of ridge-tilland no-till corn planter. Transactions of the ChineseSociety for Agricultural Machinery, 8, 48-53. (in Chinese)

[22]Tessier S, Saxton K E, Papendick R I, Hyde G M. 1991.Zero-tillage furrow opener effects on seed environmentand wheat emergence. Soil and Tillage Research, 21,347-360.

[23]Uri N D, Atwood J D, Sanabria J. 1998. The environmentalbenefits and costs of conservation tillage. Science ofthe Total Environment, 216, 13-32.

[24]Vamerali T, Bertocco M, Sartori L. 2006. Effects of a newwide-sweep opener for no-till planter on seed zoneproperties and root establishment in maize (Zea maysL.): a comparison with double-disk opener. Soil andTillage Research, 89, 196-209.

[25]Xie Z K, Wang Y J, Li F M. 2005. Effect of plastic mulchingon soil water use and spring wheat yield in arid regionof northwest China. Agricultural Water Management,75, 71-83.

[26]Yang Q. 2002. Relative study on spring wheat’s plantcharacter and yield in cold and arid areas. Journal ofShanxi Agricultural Sciences, 9, 1-3. (in Chinese)

[27]Yao Z L, Li H W, Gao H W, Wang X Y, He J. 2009. Cropper formance as af fected by three openingconfigurations for no-till seeder in annual doublecropping regions of northern China. Australian Journalof Soil Research, 47, 839-847.

[28]Zhang J X, Liu C Y, Shi J L, Jing M, Wang F. 2006. Effectsof no tillage with stubble mulch on sowing and seedlingof spring wheat in the Hexi irrigation area. Journal ofGansu Agricultural University, 4, 31-34. (in Chinese)

[29]Zhu G H, Li W Y, He J. 2008. Design and experiment on2BFML-5 no-till planter for permanent raised bed.Transactions of the Chinese Society for AgriculturalMachinery, 2, 51-54. (in Chinese)
[1] LIU Zhu, NAN Zhen-wu, LIN Song-ming, YU Hai-qiu, XIE Li-yong, MENG Wei-wei, ZHANG Zheng, WAN Shu-bo. Millet/peanut intercropping at a moderate N rate increases crop productivity and N use efficiency, as well as economic benefits, under rain-fed conditions[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 738-751.
[2] WANG Yuan-zheng, Olusegun IDOWU, WANG Yun, HOMMA Koki, NAKAZAKI Tetsuya, ZHENG Wen-jing, XU Zheng-jin, SHIRAIWA Tatsuhiko. Interaction effect of erect panicle genotype and environment on rice yield and yield components[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 716-726.
[3] Sunusi Amin ABUBAKAR, Abdoul Kader Mounkaila HAMANI, WANG Guang-shuai, LIU Hao, Faisal MEHMOOD, Abubakar Sadiq ABDULLAHI, GAO Yang, DUAN Ai-wang. Growth and nitrogen productivity of drip-irrigated winter wheat under different nitrogen fertigation strategies in the North China Plain[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 908-922.
[4] FENG Xu-yu, PU Jing-xuan, LIU Hai-jun, WANG Dan, LIU Yu-hang, QIAO Shu-ting, LEI Tao, LIU Rong-hao. Effect of fertigation frequency on soil nitrogen distribution and tomato yield under alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(3): 897-907.
[5] SONG Ke, QIN Qin, YANG Ye-feng, SUN Li-juan, SUN Ya-fei, ZHENG Xian-qing, LÜ Wei-guang, XUE Yong. Drip fertigation and plant hedgerows significantly reduce nitrogen and phosphorus losses and maintain high fruit yields in intensive orchards[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 598-610.
[6] GAO Hua-wei, YANG Meng-yuan, YAN Long, HU Xian-zhong, HONG Hui-long, ZHANG Xiang, SUN Ru-jian, WANG Hao-rang, WANG Xiao-bo, LIU Li-ke, ZHANG Shu-zhen, QIU Li-juan. Identification of tolerance to high density and lodging in short petiolate germplasm M657 and the effect of density on yield-related phenotypes of soybean[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 434-446.
[7] TIAN Jin-yu, LI Shao-ping, CHENG Shuang, LIU Qiu-yuan, ZHOU Lei, TAO Yu, XING Zhi-peng, HU Ya-jie, GUO Bao-wei, WEI Hai-yan, ZHANG Hong-cheng. Increasing the appropriate seedling density for higher yield in dry direct-seeded rice sown by a multifunctional seeder after wheat-straw return[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(2): 400-416.
[8] ZHENG Chang, WANG Yue-chao, XU Wen-ba, YANG De-sheng, YANG Guo-dong, YANG Chen, HUANG Jian-liang, PENG Shao-bing. Border effects of the main and ratoon crops in rice ratooning system[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 80-91.
[9] JIANG Hui, GAO Ming-wei, CHEN Ying, ZHANG Chao, WANG Jia-bao, CHAI Qi-chao, WANG Yong-cui, ZHENG Jin-xiu, WANG Xiu-li, ZHAO Jun-sheng. Effect of the L-D1 alleles on leaf morphology, canopy structure and photosynthetic productivity in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 108-119.
[10] YANG Wen-jia, LI Yu-lin, LIU Wei-jian, WANG Shi-wen, YIN Li-na, DENG Xi-ping. Agronomic management practices in dryland wheat result in variations in precipitation use efficiency due to their differential impacts on the steps in the precipitation use process[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 92-107.
[11] ZHOU Qun, YUAN Rui, ZHANG Wei-yang, GU Jun-fei, LIU Li-jun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Zhi-qin, YANG Jian-chang. Grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and physiological performance of indica/japonica hybrid rice in response to various nitrogen rates[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 63-79.
[12] Wannaporn THEPBANDIT, Narendra Kumar PAPATHOTI, Jayasimha Rayulu DADDAM, Nguyen Huy HOANG, Toan LE THANH, Chanon SAENGCHAN, Kumrai BUENSANTEAI. In vitro and in silico studies of salicylic acid on systemic induced resistance against bacterial leaf blight disease and enhancement of crop yield[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 170-184.
[13] LI Teng, ZHANG Xue-peng, LIU Qing, LIU Jin, CHEN Yuan-quan, SUI Peng. Yield penalty of maize (Zea mays L.) under heat stress in different growth stages: A review[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2465-2476.
[14] HAN Yu-ling, GUO Dong, MA Wei, GE Jun-zhu, LI Xiang-ling, Ali Noor MEHMOOD, ZHAO Ming, ZHOU Bao-yuan. Strip deep rotary tillage combined with controlled-release urea improves the grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of maize in the North China Plain[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2559-2576.
[15] DENG Fei, HE Lian-hua, CHEN Duo, ZHANG Chi, TIAN Qing-lan, WU Zhen-yuan, LI Qiu-ping, ZENG Yu-ling, ZHONG Xiao-yuan, CHEN Hong, WANG Li, REN Wan-jun. Growth characteristics and grain yield of machine-transplanted medium indica hybrid rice with high daily yield[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(9): 2547-2558.
No Suggested Reading articles found!