Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2012, Vol. 11 Issue (5): 865-877    DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(00)8609
SECTION 3: Application Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Research on Development of Agricultural Geographic Information Ontology
 HUANG Yong-qi, CUI Wei-hong, ZHANG Yang-jian, DENG Gao-yan
1.Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R.China
2.Hubei Key Laboratory of Economic Forest Germplasm Improvement and Resources Comprehensive Utilization, Huanggang Normal
University, Huanggang 438000, P.R.China
3.Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R.China
4.Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang 438000, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  This paper first analyzes the reason that agricultural geographic information gives rise to semantic heterogeneity and solution thereof. Although OWL (web ontology language) is the standard of ontology representation language in semantic web, it is insufficient in representing spatial characteristics, especially spatial relationship. Consequently it is pointed out to build geo-ontology by virtue of three theories such as mereology, location theory and topology in this paper. This paper introduces mereology, location theory and topology, and then discusses how to adopt these three theories to build geo-ontology. The outcome of experiment shows that solution put forward by this paper is feasible.

Abstract  This paper first analyzes the reason that agricultural geographic information gives rise to semantic heterogeneity and solution thereof. Although OWL (web ontology language) is the standard of ontology representation language in semantic web, it is insufficient in representing spatial characteristics, especially spatial relationship. Consequently it is pointed out to build geo-ontology by virtue of three theories such as mereology, location theory and topology in this paper. This paper introduces mereology, location theory and topology, and then discusses how to adopt these three theories to build geo-ontology. The outcome of experiment shows that solution put forward by this paper is feasible.
Keywords:  agricultural geographic information      semantic heterogeneity      mereology      location      topology      geo-ontology  
Received: 28 June 2011   Accepted:
Fund: 

This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB950603), the Science and Technology Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education, China (Q20112905), the Key Science Research Project of Huanggang Normal University, China (2011CA070), and the Doctoral Foundation Project of Huanggang Normal University, China (09cd151).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence DENG Gao-yan, Tel: +86-713-8833698, E-mail: dgyhgnu@sina.com     E-mail:  dgyhgnu@sina.com
About author:  HUANG Yong-qi, Tel: +86-713-8822963, E-mail: hyqirsa@gmail.com;

Cite this article: 

HUANG Yong-qi, CUI Wei-hong, ZHANG Yang-jian, DENG Gao-yan. 2012. Research on Development of Agricultural Geographic Information Ontology. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11(5): 865-877.

[1]Apinar I B, Sheth A, Ramakrishnan C, Usery E L, Azami M, Kwan M P. 2005. Geospatial ontology development and semantic analysis. In: Wilson J P, Fotheringham S, eds., Handbook of Geographic Information Science. Blackwell Publishing, USA.

[2]Asher N, Vieu L. 1995. Toward a geometry of common sense: a semantics and a complete axiomatization of mereotopolog. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA. pp. 846-852.

[3]Bishr Y, Kuhn W. 2000. Ontology-based modelling of geospatial information. In: Proceedings of the 3rd AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science. AGILE, Helsinki, Finland. pp. 24-27.

[4]Casati R, Smith B, Varzi A C. 1998. Ontological tools for geographic representation. In: Guarino N, ed., Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam and Oxford. pp. 77-85.

[5]Casati R, Varzi A C. 1996. The structure of spatial location. Philosophical Studies, 82, 205-239.

[6]Chaves M S, Silva M J, Martins B. 2005. A geographic knowledge base for semantic web applications. In: Processing of the 20th Brazilian Symposium on Databases (SBBD 2005). Uberlandia, MG Brasil. pp. 40-54.

[7]Cui W, Wu H. 2005. Using ontology to achieve the semantic integration and interoperation of GIS. In: 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Denver, Colorado, USA. doi: 10.1109/ IGARSS.2005.1525239 Egenhofer M J. 1990. Manipulating the graphical representation of query results in geographic information systems. In: Chang S K, ed., Workshop of Visual Languages in Skokie, IL. IEEE. pp. 119-124.

[8]Egenhofer M J, Clementini E, di Felice P. 1994. Topological relations between regions with holes. International Journal of Geograohic Information Systems, 8, 129-142.

[9]Egenhofer M J, Franzosa R. 1991. Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geograohic Information Systems, 5, 161-174.

[10]Fonseca F T, Davis C A, Camara G. 2003. Bridging ontologies and conceptual schemas in geographic information integration. GeoInformatica, 7, 355-378.

[11]Fonseca F, Egenhofer M, Agouris P, Camara G. 2002. Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS, 6, 231-257.

[12]Forrest P. 2002. Nonclassical mereology and its application to sets. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 43, 79-94.

[13]Fu G, Jones C B, Abdelmoty A I. 2005. Building a geographical ontology for intelligent spatial search on the web. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IASTED International Conference on Databases and Appalications. ActaPress, Innsbruck, Austria. pp. 167-172.

[14]Galton A. 2003. Desiderata for a spatio-temporal geoontology. Spatial Information Theory. Foundations of Geographic Information Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2825, 1-12. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_1

[15]Gotts N M, Gooday J M, Cohn A G. 1996. A connection based approach to common-sense topological description and reasoning. The Monist, 78, 51-75.

[16]Grenon P. 2003. The formal ontology of spatio-temporal reality and its formalization. In: AAAI Technical Report Series. AAAI Spring Symposium on the Foundations and Applications of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning. Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, USA.

[17]Guo R Z. 1997. Spatial Analysis. The Publishing House of Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan. (in Chinese)

[18]Guo R Z. 2001. Spatial Analysis. Higher Education Press, Beijing. pp. 4-5. (in Chinese) Hawthorne J, Sider T. 2002. Locations. Philosophical Topics, 30, 53-76.

[19]Hess G N, Iochpe C, Castano S. 2006. An algorithm and implementation for geoontologies intergration. In: Proceedings of VIII Brazilian Symposium on Geoinformatics (GEOINFO’06). pp. 109-120.

[20]Huang Y Q, Deng G Y. 2009. Research on representation of geographic spatio-temporal information and spatiotemporal reasoning rules based on geo-ontology and SWRL. In: Proceedings of 2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology. vol. 3. IEEE Computer Society, Wuhan, China. pp. 381-384. doi: 10.1109/ESIAT.2009. 181

[21]Henriksson R, Kauppinen T, Hyvönen E. 2008. Core geographical concepts: case Finnish geo-ontology. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Location and the Web. ACM, New York, USA. Jiang L, Li B, Gong J Y, Min M. 2006. GeoReferencing the semantic web based on geoontology. In: 2006 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Denver, Colorado, USA. doi: 10.1109/ IGARSS.2006.398 Kuhn W. 2002. Modeling the semantics of geographic categories through conceptual integration. In: Egenhofer M J, Mark D M, eds., GIScience. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 2478. pp. 108-118.

[22]Mata F, Levachkine S. 2009. iRank: integral ranking of geographical information by semantic, geographic, and topological matching. In: Information Fusion and Geographic Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Part 2.

[23]Springer-Verlag, Berlin, German. pp. 77-92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00304-2 5 Pietruszczak A. 2005. Pieces of mereology. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 14, 211-234.

[24]Smith B. 1994. Fiat objects. In: Guarino N, Pribbenow S L, Vieu L, eds., Parts and Wholes: Conceptual Part-Whole Relations and Formal Mereology. Proceedings the ECAI94 Workshop. ECCAI, Amsterdam, Holland. pp. 15-23.

[25]Smith B. 1997. Boundaries: an essay in mereotopology. In: Hahn L H, ed., The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm (Library of Living Philosophers). Open Court, Chicago and La Salle, IL. pp. 534-561.

[26]Song J, Zhu Y Q, Wang J L, Li R. 2009. A study on the model of spatio-temporal geo-ontology based on GML. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 11, 442-451. (in Chinese)

[27]Souza D, Salgado A C, Tedesco P A. 2006. Towards a context ontology for geospatial data integration. In: Meersman R, Tari Z, Herrero P, eds., OTM Workshops (2), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol. 4278. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, German. pp. 1576-1585.

[28]Spaccapietra S, Cullot N, Parent C, Vangenot C. 2004. On spatial ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 6th Brazilian Symposium on GeoInformatics. Campos do Jordao, Brazil. Varzi A C. 1994. On the boundary between mereology and topology. In: Casati R, Smith B, White G, eds., Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences. Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna. pp. 423-442.

[29]Varzi A C. 1996. Parts, wholes, and part-whole relations: The prospects of mereotopology. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 20, 259-286. Varzi A C. 2007. Spatial reasoning and ontology: parts, wholes, and locations. In: Aiello M, Pratt-Hartmann I, van Benthem J, eds., Handbook of Spatial Logics. Springer-Verlag, Netherlands. pp. 945-1038.

[30]Xie N F, Wang W S, Yang Y. 2008. Ontology-based agricultural knowledge acquisition and application. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 258, 349-357. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-77251-6_38

[31]Xu Q L, Yang K, Wang J, Peng S Y, Yi J H. 2008. A study on ontology-driven geospatial-information retrieval systems in the semantic web. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. vol. XXXVII. Part B2. Taylor & Francis Group, London, Beijing, China.

[32]Xu W, Huang H K, Liu X H. 2006. Spatio-temporal ontology and its application in geographic information system. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. University of Michigan, Ann Arb, USA. pp. 1487-1492.

[33]Zheng Y L, He Q Y, Qian P, Li Z. 2012. Construction of the ontology-based agricultural knowledge management system. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11, pp. 700-709.
[1] Yonghui Fan, Boya Qin, Jinhao Yang, Liangliang Ma, Guoji Cui, Wei He, Yu Tang, Wenjing Zhang, Shangyu Ma, Chuanxi Ma, Zhenglai Huang.

Night warming increases wheat yield by improving pre-anthesis plant growth and post-anthesis grain starch biosynthesis [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(2): 536-550.

[2] LI Jiao-jiao, ZHAO Li, LÜ Bo-ya, FU Yu, ZHANG Shu-fa, LIU Shu-hui, YANG Qun-hui, WU Jun, LI Jia-chuang, CHEN Xin-hong. Development and characterization of a novel common wheat–Mexico Rye T1DL·1RS translocation line with stripe rust and powdery mildew resistance[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(5): 1291-1307.
[3] XU Shi-rui, JIANG Bo, HAN Hai-ming, JI Xia-jie, ZHANG Jin-peng, ZHOU Sheng-hui, YANG Xin-ming, LI Xiu-quan, LI Li-hui, LIU Wei-hua. Genetic effects of Agropyron cristatum 2P chromosome translocation fragments in wheat background[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 52-62.
[4] ZHU Kuan-yu, YAN Jia-qian, SHEN Yong, ZHANG Wei-yang, XU Yun-ji, WANG Zhi-qin, YANG Jian-chang. Deciphering the morpho–physiological traits for high yield potential in nitrogen efficient varieties (NEVs): A japonica rice case study[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(4): 947-963.
[5] HUANG Li-ying, Li Xiao-xiao, ZHANG Yun-bo, Shah FAHAD, WANG Fei. dep1 improves rice grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency simultaneously by enhancing nitrogen and dry matter translocation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(11): 3185-3198.
[6] LIANG Xiao-gui, SHEN Si, GAO Zhen, ZHANG Li, ZHAO Xue, ZHOU Shun-li. Variation of carbon partitioning in newly expanded maize leaves and plant adaptive growth under extended darkness[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(9): 2360-2371.
[7] LENG Gan-xiao, FENG Xiao-long, QIU Huan-guang . Income effects of poverty alleviation relocation program on rural farmers in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(4): 891-904.
[8] ZOU Rong, WU Ji-su, WANG Ruo-mei, YAN Yue-ming. Grain proteomic analysis reveals central stress responsive proteins caused by wheat-Haynaldia villosa 6VS/6AL translocation[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(11): 2628-2642.
[9] ZHAO Jian-hua, LI Hao-xia, ZHANG Cun-zhi, AN Wei, YIN Yue, WANG Ya-jun, CAO You-long. Physiological response of four wolfberry (Lycium Linn.) species under drought stress[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(03): 603-612.
[10] Wasan Jaruchai, Tidarat Monkham, Sompong Chankaew, Bhalang Suriharn, Jirawat Sanitchon. Evaluation of stability and yield potential of upland rice genotypes in North and Northeast Thailand[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(01): 28-36.
[11] LIU Chang, YE Xing-guo, WANG Mei-jiao, LI Shi-jin, LIN Zhi-shan. Genetic behavior of Triticum aestivum–Dasypyrum villosum translocation chromosomes T6V#4S·6DL and T6V#2S·6AL carrying powdery mildew resistance[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(10): 2136-2144.
[12] TANG Yun-jia, Johannes Liesche. The molecular mechanism of shade avoidance in crops- How data from Arabidopsis can help to identify targets for increasing yield and biomass production[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(06): 1244-1255.
[13] LIU Bin, CHEN Li, CHEN Shi-bao, LI Ning, ZHENG Han, JIN Ke, PANG Huan-cheng, MA Yi-bing. Subcellular Cd accumulation characteristic in root cell wall of rice cultivars with different sensitivities to Cd stress in soil[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(9): 2114-2122.
[14] ZONG Yu-zheng, SHANGGUAN Zhou-ping. Increased sink capacity enhances C and N assimilation under drought and elevated CO2 conditions in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(12): 2775-2785.
[15] ZHANG Pan-pan, SONG Hui, KE Xi-wang, JIN Xi-jun, YIN Li-hua, LIU Yang, QU Yang, SU Wang, FENG Nai-jie, ZHENG Dian-feng, FENG Bai-li. GGE biplot analysis of yield stability and test location representativeness in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) genotypes[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(06): 1218-1227.
No Suggested Reading articles found!