Please wait a minute...
Journal of Integrative Agriculture  2012, Vol. 12 Issue (4): 576-584    DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(00)8577
PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY · TILLAGE · CULTIVATION Advanced Online Publication | Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
A Novel Approach to the Water Uptake Dynamics in Roots of Maize, Wheat and Barley Under Salt Stress
 BU Qing-mei, BIAN Dian-xia, LIU Lin-de , ZHU Jian-jun
1.College of Life Sciences, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, P.R.China
Download:  PDF in ScienceDirect  
Export:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要  The water uptake dynamics in maize, wheat, and barley under salt stress were investigated with a xylem pressure probe. The average xylem pressure responses to salt stress in the three plants were 36, 93, and 89% of the osmotic stresses for maize, wheat, and barley, respectively, which are significantly smaller than the magnitude of the osmotic stresses being applied. In order to explain the thermodynamic discrepancies among the water potential changes in the root xylem of the three plants, a novel approach, tentatively named the “symplastic flow dilution model” was proposed in this paper. The model was presented in an attempt to give answers to the problem of how the roots under salt stress could absorb water when the water potential of the xylem sap is considerably higher than that of the solution in the root ambient. According to the model, the salt solution in the microenvironment of the endodermis of a root was diluted to some extent by the efflux from cells so the central stele of the root is not exposed to the same solution bathing the root with the same salt concentration. In contrast, we also presented another approach, the “reflection coefficient progression approach”, which was less likely to be true because it requires a considerable amount of solute to be transported into the root xylem when the salt stress is severe.

Abstract  The water uptake dynamics in maize, wheat, and barley under salt stress were investigated with a xylem pressure probe. The average xylem pressure responses to salt stress in the three plants were 36, 93, and 89% of the osmotic stresses for maize, wheat, and barley, respectively, which are significantly smaller than the magnitude of the osmotic stresses being applied. In order to explain the thermodynamic discrepancies among the water potential changes in the root xylem of the three plants, a novel approach, tentatively named the “symplastic flow dilution model” was proposed in this paper. The model was presented in an attempt to give answers to the problem of how the roots under salt stress could absorb water when the water potential of the xylem sap is considerably higher than that of the solution in the root ambient. According to the model, the salt solution in the microenvironment of the endodermis of a root was diluted to some extent by the efflux from cells so the central stele of the root is not exposed to the same solution bathing the root with the same salt concentration. In contrast, we also presented another approach, the “reflection coefficient progression approach”, which was less likely to be true because it requires a considerable amount of solute to be transported into the root xylem when the salt stress is severe.
Keywords:  maize      wheat      barley      salt stress      xylem pressure      water transport  
Received: 04 March 2011   Accepted:
Fund: 

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB421303).

Corresponding Authors:  Correspondence ZHU Jian-jun, Tel: +86-535-6681053, E-mail: jzjzhu@gmail.com     E-mail:  jzjzhu@gmail.com

Cite this article: 

BU Qing-mei, BIAN Dian-xia, LIU Lin-de , ZHU Jian-jun. 2012. A Novel Approach to the Water Uptake Dynamics in Roots of Maize, Wheat and Barley Under Salt Stress. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(4): 576-584.

[1]Bai X F, Zhu J J, Zhang P, Wang Y H, Yang L Q, Zhang L. 2007. Na+ and water uptake in relation to the radial reflection coefficient of root in arrowleaf saltbush under salt stress. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 49, 1334-1340.

[2]Balling A, Zimmermann U. 1990. Comparative measurements of the xylem pressure of Nicotiana plants by means of the pressure bomb and pressure probe. Planta, 182, 325-338.

[3]Canny M J. 1995. A new theory for the ascent of sap: cohesion supported by tissue pressure. Annuals of Botany, 75, 343-357.

[4]Canny M J. 1998. Transporting water in plants. American Scientist, 86, 152-159.

[5]Dainty J, Ginzburg B Z. 1964. The reflection of coefficient of plant cell membranes for certain solutes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (Specialized Section on Biophysical Subjects), 79, 129-137.

[6]Enns L C, Canny M J, McCully M E. 2000. An investigation of the role of solutes in the xylem sap and in the xylem parenchyma as the source of root pressure. Protoplasma, 211, 183-197.

[7]Enns L C, McCully M E, Canny M J. 1998. Solute concentrations in xylem sap along vessels of maize primary roots at high root pressure. Journal of Experimental Botany, 29, 1539-1544.

[8]Fiscus E L. 1977. Determination of hydraulic and osmotic properties of soybean root systems. Plant Physiology, 59, 1013-1020.

[9]Ginsburg H, Ginsburg B Z. 1970. Radial water and solute flows in roots of Zea mays. Journal of Experimental Botany, 21, 580-592.

[10]Hanson P J, Sucoff E I, Markhart A H. 1985. Quantifying apoplastic flux through red pine root systems using trisodium 3-hydroxy-5,8,10-pyrenetrisulfonate. Plant Physiology, 77, 21-24.

[11]Hose E, Clarkson D T, Steudle E, Schreiber L, Hartung W. 2001. The exodermis -a variable apoplastic barrier. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 2245-2264.

[12]House C R. 1974. Water Transport in Cells and Tissues. Edward Arnold, London. Miller D M. 1985a. Studies of root function in Zea mays. III. Xylem sap composition at maximum root pressure provides evidence of active transport into the xylem and a measurement of the reflection coefficient of the root. Plant Physiology, 77, 162-167.

[13]Miller D M. 1985b. Studies of root function in Zea mays. IV. Effects of applied pressure on the hydraulic conductivity and volume flow through the excised root. Plant Physiology, 77, 168-174.

[14]Miyamoto N, Steudle E, Hirasawa T, Lafitte R. 2001. Hydraulic conductivity of rice roots. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52, 1835-1846.

[15]Munns R, Passioura J B. 1984. Effect of prolonged exposure to NaCl on the osmotic pressure of leaf xylem sap from intact, transpiting barley plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 11, 497-507.

[16]Ranathunge K, Kotula L, Steudle E, Lafitte R. 2004. Water permeability and reflection coefficient of the outer part of young rice roots are differently affected by closure of water channels (aquaporins) or blockage of apoplastic pores. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 433-447.

[17]Rygol J, Zimmermann U. 1990. Radial and axial turgor pressure measurements in individual root cells of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum grown under various saline conditions. Plant, Cell and Environment, 13, 15-26.

[18]Rygol J, Pritchard J, Zhu J J, Tomos A D, Zimmermann U. 1993. Transpiration induces radial turgor pressure gradients in wheat and maize roots. Plant Physiology, 103, 493-500.

[19]Schneider H, Zhu J J, Zimmermann U. 1997. Xylem and cell turgor pressure probe measurements in intact roots of glycophytes: transpiration induces a change in the radial and cellular reflection coefficients. Plant Cell Environment, 20, 221-229.

[20]Shabala S, Shabala S, Cuin T A, Pang J, Percey W, Chen Z, Conn S, Eing C, Wegner L H. 2010. Xylem ionic relations and salinity tolerance in barley. The Plant Journal, 61, 839-853.

[21]Steudle E. 2002. Transport of water in plants. Environment Control in Biology, 40, 29-37.

[22]Steudle E, Murrmann M, Peterson C A. 1993. Transport of water and solutes across maize roots modified by puncturing the endodermis: further evidence of the composite transport model of the root. Plant Physiology, 103, 335-349.

[23]Steudle E, Peterson C A. 1998. How does water get through roots? Journal of Experimental Botany, 49, 775-788.

[24]Varney G T, McCully M E, Canny M J. 1993. Sites of entry of water into the symplast of maize roots. New Phytologist, 125, 733-741.

[25]Weatherley P E. 1982. Water uptake and flow in roots. In: Lange O L, Nobel P S, Osmond C B, Ziegler H, eds., Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, vol. 12B. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 79-109.

[26]Wei C, Tyree M T, Steudle E. 1999. Direct measurement of xylem pressure in leaves of intact maize plants. A test of the cohesion-tension theory taking hydraulic architecture into consideration. Plant Physiology, 121, 1191-1205.

[27]Zholkevich V N, Chugunova T V, Kordev A V. 1990. New data on the nature of root pressure. Studia Biophysica, 130, 209-216.

[28]Zhu J J, Bai X F, Zhang P, Bu Q M. 2005. Self-regulation of xylem pressure in barley roots under salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 31, 97-102. (in Chinese)

[29]Zhu J J, Zimmermann U, Thürmer F, Haase A. 1995. Xylem pressure in maize roots subjected to osmotic stress: determination of radial reflection coefficients by using the xylem pressure probe. Plant Cell and Environment, 18, 906-912.

[30]Zimmermann U, Haase A, Langbein D, Meinzer F. 1993. Mechanism of long-distance water transport in plants: a re-examination of some paradigms in the light of new evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, 341, 19-31.

[31]Zimmermann U, Rygol J, Balling A, Klock G, Metzler A, Haase A. 1992. Radial turgor and osmotic pressure profiles in intact and excised roots of Aster tripolium. Pressure probe measurements and nuclear magnetic resonance-imaging analysis. Plant Physiology, 99, 186-196.

[32]Zimmermann U, Zhu J J, Meinzer F C, Goldstein G, Schneider H, Zimmermann G, Benkert R, Thurmer F, Melcher P, Webb D, et al. 1994. High molecular weight organic compounds in the xylem sap of mangroves: implications for long-distance water transport. Botanica Acta, 107, 218-229.
[1] Zihui Liu, Xiangjun Lai, Yijin Chen, Peng Zhao, Xiaoming Wang, Wanquan Ji, Shengbao Xu. Selection and application of four QTLs for grain protein content in modern wheat cultivars[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2557-2570.
[2] Gensheng Zhang, Mudi Sun, Xinyao Ma, Wei Liu, Zhimin Du, Zhensheng Kang, Jie Zhao. Yr5-virulent races of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici possess relative parasitic fitness higher than current main predominant races and potential risk[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(8): 2674-2685.
[3] Wenjie Yang, Jie Yu, Yanhang Li, Bingli Jia, Longgang Jiang, Aijing Yuan, Yue Ma, Ming Huang, Hanbing Cao, Jinshan Liu, Weihong Qiu, Zhaohui Wang. Optimized NPK fertilizer recommendations based on topsoil available nutrient criteria for wheat in drylands of China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2421-2433.
[4] Jiang Liu, Wenyu Yang. Soybean maize strip intercropping: A solution for maintaining food security in China[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2503-2506.
[5] Hui Fang, Xiuyi Fu, Hanqiu Ge, Mengxue Jia, Jie Ji, Yizhou Zhao, Zijian Qu, Ziqian Cui, Aixia Zhang, Yuandong Wang, Ping Li, Baohua Wang. Genetic analysis and candidate gene identification of salt tolerancerelated traits in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2196-2210.
[6] Hui Chen, Hongxing Chen, Song Zhang, Shengxi Chen, Fulang Cen, Quanzhi Zhao, Xiaoyun Huang, Tengbing He, Zhenran Gao. Comparison of CWSI and Ts-Ta-VIs in moisture monitoring of dryland crops (sorghum and maize) based on UAV remote sensing[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2458-2475.
[7] Peng Liu, Langlang Ma, Siyi Jian, Yao He, Guangsheng Yuan, Fei Ge, Zhong Chen, Chaoying Zou, Guangtang Pan, Thomas Lübberstedt, Yaou Shen. Population genomic analysis reveals key genetic variations and the driving force for embryonic callus induction capability in maize[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2178-2195.
[8] Yibo Hu, Feng Qin, Zhen Wu, Xiaoqin Wang, Xiaolong Ren, Zhikuan Jia, Zhenlin Wang, Xiaoguang Chen, Tie Cai. Heterogeneous population distribution enhances resistance to wheat lodging by optimizing the light environment[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2211-2226.
[9] Bingli Jiang, Wei Gao, Yating Jiang, Shengnan Yan, Jiajia Cao, Litian Zhang, Yue Zhang, Jie Lu, Chuanxi Ma, Cheng Chang, Haiping Zhang. Identification of P-type plasma membrane H+-ATPases in common wheat and characterization of TaHA7 associated with seed dormancy and germination[J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(7): 2164-2177.
[10] Yongchao Hao, Fanmei Kong, Lili Wang, Yu Zhao, Mengyao Li, Naixiu Che, Shuang Li, Min Wang, Ming Hao, Xiaocun Zhang, Yan Zhao.

Genome-wide association study of grain micronutrient concentrations in bread wheat [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1468-1480.

[11] Zhikai Cheng, Xiaobo Gu, Yadan Du, Zhihui Zhou, Wenlong Li, Xiaobo Zheng, Wenjing Cai, Tian Chang.

Spectral purification improves monitoring accuracy of the comprehensive growth evaluation index for film-mulched winter wheat [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1523-1540.

[12] Jiangkuan Cui, Haohao Ren, Bo Wang, Fujie Chang, Xuehai Zhang, Haoguang Meng, Shijun Jiang, Jihua Tang.

Hatching and development of maize cyst nematode Heterodera zeae infecting different plant hosts [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1593-1603.

[13] Qilong Song, Jie Zhang, Fangfang Zhang, Yufang Shen, Shanchao Yue, Shiqing Li.

Optimized nitrogen application for maximizing yield and minimizing nitrogen loss in film mulching spring maize production on the Loess Plateau, China [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(5): 1671-1684.

[14] Haiqing Gong, Yue Xiang, Jiechen Wu, Laichao Luo, Xiaohui Chen, Xiaoqiang Jiao, Chen Chen.

Integrating phosphorus management and cropping technology for sustainable maize production [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1369-1380.

[15] Xuan Li, Shaowen Wang, Yifan Chen, Danwen Zhang, Shanshan Yang, Jingwen Wang, Jiahua Zhang, Yun Bai, Sha Zhang.

Improved simulation of winter wheat yield in North China Plain by using PRYM-Wheat integrated dry matter distribution coefficient [J]. >Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2024, 23(4): 1381-1392.

No Suggested Reading articles found!