|
|
|
|
|
| Effect of Nitrogen Regimes on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization, Radiation Use Efficiency, and Sheath Blight Disease Intensity in Super Hybrid Rice |
| LI Di-qin, TANG Qi-yuan, ZHANG Yun-bo, QIN Jian-quan, LI Hu, CHEN Li-jun, YANG Sheng-hai, ZOU Ying-bin , PENG Shao-bing |
1.State Key Laboratory of Hybrid Rice, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, P.R.China
2.Crop Physiology and Production Center (CPPC), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P.R.China Abstract |
|
|
|
摘要 Poor nitrogen use efficiency in rice production is a critical issue in China. Site-specific N managements (SSNM) such as real-time N management (RTNM) and fixed-time adjustable-dose N management (FTNM) improve fertilizer-N use efficiency of irrigated rice. This study was aimed to compare the different nitrogen (N) rates and application methods (FFP, SSNM, and RTNM methods) under with- and without-fungicide application conditions on grain yield, yield components, solar radiation use efficiency (RUE), agronomic-nitrogen use efficiency (AEN), and sheath blight disease intensity. Field experiments were carried out at Liuyang County, Hunan Province, China, during 2006 and 2007. A super hybrid rice Liangyou 293 (LY293) was used as experimental material. The results showed that RTNM and SSNM have great potential for improving agronomic-nitrogen use efficiency without sacrificing the grain yield. There were significant differences in light interception rate, sheath blight disease incidence (DI) and the disease index (ShBI), and total dry matter among the different nitrogen management methods. The radiation use efficiency was increased in a certain level of applied N. But, the harvest index (HI) decreased with the increase in applied N. There is a quadratic curve relationship between grain yield and applied N rates. With the same N fertilizer rate, different fertilizer-N application methods affected the RUE and grain yield. The fungicide application not only improved the canopy light interception rate, RUE, grain filling, and harvest index, but also reduced the degree of sheath blight disease. The treatment of RTNM under the SPAD threshold value 40 obtained the highest yield. While the treatment of SSNM led to the highest nitrogen agronomic efficiency and higher rice yield, and decreased the infestation of sheath blight disease dramatically as well. Nitrogen application regimes and diseases control in rice caused obvious effects on light interception rate, RUE, and HI. Optimal N rate is helpful to get higher light interception rate, RUE, and HI. Disease control with fungicide application decreased and delayed the negative effects of the high N on rice yield formation. SSNM and RTNM under the proper SPAD threshold value obtained highyield with high efficiency and could alleviate environmental pollution in rice production.
Abstract Poor nitrogen use efficiency in rice production is a critical issue in China. Site-specific N managements (SSNM) such as real-time N management (RTNM) and fixed-time adjustable-dose N management (FTNM) improve fertilizer-N use efficiency of irrigated rice. This study was aimed to compare the different nitrogen (N) rates and application methods (FFP, SSNM, and RTNM methods) under with- and without-fungicide application conditions on grain yield, yield components, solar radiation use efficiency (RUE), agronomic-nitrogen use efficiency (AEN), and sheath blight disease intensity. Field experiments were carried out at Liuyang County, Hunan Province, China, during 2006 and 2007. A super hybrid rice Liangyou 293 (LY293) was used as experimental material. The results showed that RTNM and SSNM have great potential for improving agronomic-nitrogen use efficiency without sacrificing the grain yield. There were significant differences in light interception rate, sheath blight disease incidence (DI) and the disease index (ShBI), and total dry matter among the different nitrogen management methods. The radiation use efficiency was increased in a certain level of applied N. But, the harvest index (HI) decreased with the increase in applied N. There is a quadratic curve relationship between grain yield and applied N rates. With the same N fertilizer rate, different fertilizer-N application methods affected the RUE and grain yield. The fungicide application not only improved the canopy light interception rate, RUE, grain filling, and harvest index, but also reduced the degree of sheath blight disease. The treatment of RTNM under the SPAD threshold value 40 obtained the highest yield. While the treatment of SSNM led to the highest nitrogen agronomic efficiency and higher rice yield, and decreased the infestation of sheath blight disease dramatically as well. Nitrogen application regimes and diseases control in rice caused obvious effects on light interception rate, RUE, and HI. Optimal N rate is helpful to get higher light interception rate, RUE, and HI. Disease control with fungicide application decreased and delayed the negative effects of the high N on rice yield formation. SSNM and RTNM under the proper SPAD threshold value obtained highyield with high efficiency and could alleviate environmental pollution in rice production.
|
|
Received: 23 December 2010
Accepted:
|
| Fund: The study was conducted under the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30671219), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2009CB118 603). |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Correspondence TANG Qi-yuan, Tel: +86-731-84673648, E-mail: cntqy@yahoo.com.cn
|
Cite this article:
LI Di-qin, TANG Qi-yuan, ZHANG Yun-bo, QIN Jian-quan, LI Hu, CHEN Li-jun, YANG Sheng-hai, ZOU Ying-bin , PENG Shao-bing .
2012.
Effect of Nitrogen Regimes on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization, Radiation Use Efficiency, and Sheath Blight Disease Intensity in Super Hybrid Rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 12(1): 134-143.
|
| [1]Ahn R C, Mew T W. 1986. Relationship between rice sheath blight and yield. International Rice Research Newsletter, 11, 21-22. [2]Balasubramanian V, Morales A C, Cruz R T, Abdulrachman S. 1999. On-farm adaptation of knowledge-intensive nitrogen management technologies for rice systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 53, 59-69. [3]Cheng S H, Cao L Y, Chen S G, Zhu D F, Wang X, Min S K, Zhai H Q. 2005. Conception of late-stage vigor super hybrid rice and it’s biological significance. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 19, 80-284. (in Chinese) [4]Cu R M, Mew T W, Cassman K G, Teng P S. 1996. Effect of sheath blight on yield in tropical, intensive rice production system. Plant Disease, 80, 1103-1108. (in Chinese) [5]Dobermann A, Witt C, Dawe D, Abdulrachman S, Gines H C, Nagarajan R, Satawathananont S, Son T T, Tan P S, Wang G H, et al. 2002. Site-specific nutrient management for intensive rice cropping systems in Asia. Field Crops Research, 74, 37-66. [6]He F, Huang J L, Cui K H, Zen J M, Xu B, Peng S B, Boland B J. 2007. Effect of real-time and site-specific nitrogen management on rice yield and quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 40, 123-132. (in Chinese) [7]Hu C J, Li Y R, Huang S L. 2004. New progress in research of rice resistance to rice sheath blight. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 20, 186-189. (in Chinese) [8]Hussain F, Bronson KF, Singh Y, Singh B, Peng S B. 2000. Use of chlorophyll meter sufficiency indices for nitrogen management of irrigated rice in Asia. Agronomy Journal, 92, 875-879. [9]Mitchell L P, Sheehy J E , Woodward F I. 1998. Potential yields and the efficiency of radiation use in rice. International Rice Research Notes Discussion Paper Series, 32, 1762-1766. [10]Monteith J L. 1977. Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London), B281, 277-294. [11]Peng S, Buresh R J, Huang J, Yang J, Zou Y B, Zhong X H, Wang G H, Zhang F S. 2006. Strategies for overcoming low agronomic nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice systems in China. Field Crops Research, 96, 37-47. [12]Peng S B, Garcia F V, Laza R C, Sanico A L, Visperas R M, Cassman K G. 1996. Increased N-use efficiency using a chlorophyll meter on high yielding irrigated rice. Field Crops Research, 47, 243-252. [13]Peng S B, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Yang J C, Wang G H, Zou Y B, Zhang F S, Zhu Q S, Buresh R, Witt C. 2002. Research strategy in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 35, 1095-1103. (in Chinese) [14]Peng S B, Khush G S, Virk P, Tang Q Y, Zou Y B. 2008. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Research, 108, 32-38. [15]Peng S B, Laza R C, Visperas R M, Khush G S. 2004. Rice: progress in breaking the yield ceiling. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress. Brisbane, Australia. [16]Peng S B, Buresh R J, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Zou Y B, Yang J C, Wang G H, Liu Y Y, Tang Q Y, Cui K H, Zhang F S, Dobermann A. 2010. Improving notrigen fertilization in rice by site-specific N management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 649-656. [17]Peng X L, Liu Y Y, Luo S G, Fan L C, Song T X, Guo Y W. 2006. Effects of the site-specific nitrogen management on yield and dry matter accumulation of rice in cold areas of northeastern. China Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 39, 2286-2293. (in Chinese) [18]Savary S, Castilla N P, Elazegui F A. 1995. Direct and indirect effects of nitrogen supply and disease source structure on rice sheath blight spread. Phytopathology, 85, 959-1011. [19]Sha X. 1998. Measurement and inheritance of resistance to sheath blight caused by RHIZOCTONIA SOLANI KUHN in rice. Ph D thesis, Philippines University. Sinclair T R, Horie T. 1989. Leaf N, photosynthesis, and crop radiation use efficiency: A review. Crop Science, 29, 90-98. [20]Sinclair T R, Muchow R C. 1999. Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy, 65, 215-266. [21]Tang Q Y. 2005. Canopy eco-physiological properties and the influence factors in irrigated rice. Ph D thesis, Hunan Agricultural University. (in Chinese) Tang Q Y, Peng S B, Buresh R J, Zou Y, Castilla N P, Mewc T W, Zhong X H. 2007. Rice varietal difference in sheath blight development and its association with yield loss at different levels of N fertilization. Field Crops Research, 102, 219-227. [22]Tao Q N, Fang P, Wu L H, Zhou W. 1990. Study of leaf color diagnosis of nitrogen nutrition in rice plants. Soils, 22, 190-193. (in Chinese) [23]Tollenaar M, Aguilera A. 1992. Radiation use efficiency of an old and a new maize hybrid. Agronomy Journal, 84, 536-541. [24]Wang G H, Dobermann A, Witt C, Sun Q Z, Fu R X. 2001. Performance of site-specific nutrient management for irrigated rice in southeast China. Agronomy Journal, 93, 869-878. [25]Wang Q C, Wang S Z. 1994. Progress of crop photosynthesis research. In: Zou Q, Wang X C, eds., Progress in Physiological Research of Crop High Yield and High Efficiency. Science Press, Beijing, China. pp. 172-223. (in Chinese) [26]Xie H A, Wang W Q, Yang H J,Yang G Q, Li Y Z. 2003. The characteristics of super high yield hybrid rice. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Science, 18, 201-204. (in Chinese) [27]Yang W H, Peng S, Huang J, Sanico A L, Buresh R J, Witt C. 2003. Using leaf color charts to estimate leaf nitrogen status of rice. Agronomy Journal, 95, 212-217. [28]Zhong X H, Peng S B, Buresh R J, Huang N R, Zheng H B. 2006. Some canopy indices influencing sheath blight development in hybrid rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 20, 535-542. (in Chinese) |
| No Suggested Reading articles found! |
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
