Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (15): 3040-3050.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.15.017

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCE • Previous Articles    

The Protective Efficacy of Commercial Vaccines Against H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus of Branch h9.4.2.5 Isolated in China

MA Qi1(), HE XinWen1, WANG Yan1, LIU YanJing1, PAN ShuXin1,3, HOU YuJie1, SHI JianZhong1,3, DENG GuoHua1,3, BAO HongMei1,3, LIU JingLi2, GUO XingFu2, MAO ShengGang2, HU JingLei2, LU Tong2, YANG Fan2, TIAN GuoBin1,3, ZENG XianYing1,3(), CHEN HuaLan1,3()   

  1. 1 National Poultry Laboratory Animal Resource Center/State Key Lab for Animal Disease Control and Prevention/Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150069
    2 Harbin Weike Biotechnology Company Limited, Harbin 150069
    3 Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Avian Influenza and Other Major Poultry Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150069
  • Received:2022-07-04 Accepted:2022-09-15 Online:2023-08-01 Published:2023-08-05

RichHTML

4

PDF

420

Abstract:

【Objective】 There are many commercial inactivated vaccines against the H9 subtype avian influenza approved for use in China, and their protection efficacy and selection have been widely concerned by farmers. In this study, the protection efficacy of main commercial vaccines against H9N2 viruses recently isolated in the field were evaluated, so as to provide the research reference for guiding the prevention and control of H9 subtype AI by immunization in China.【Method】 According to the vaccine batch release of the National Veterinary Drug Basic Information Database in China, 4 commercial vaccines (labeled as A-D) with large batches were selected from 40 kinds of sold H9 commercial vaccines. The four H9N2 subtype AIV, including CK/XJ/S1204/2015, DK/JX/S4512/2017, CK/YN/S1666/2020 and CK/NX/S4590/2020, belonging to h9.4.2.5 branch and isolated at different times and places, were used to evaluate the protection efficacy of selected commercial H9 subtype AI vaccines. The 50% chicken embryo infection (EID50), 50% chicken infection (CID50), and 50% cell infection (TCID50) of the four viruses were tested to determine the challenge dose of the animal experiment and the infection dose of the cell test. 40 3-week-old SPF chickens were injected intramuscularly with 4 kinds of inactivated vaccine, and the groups of 10 similar SPF chickens were inoculated with PBS as control group. 3 weeks post vaccination (p.v.), the serum of all experimental chickens were collected before challenge, the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and neutralization (NT) antibody titers were detected by HI test and neutralization test; the 40 immunized chickens of each vaccine were randomly divided into four groups, and 10 chickens of each vaccine and 10 control chickens were infected intranasally with the 10 CID50 of each H9N2 virus. Oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs were collected on days 3 and 5 post challenge (p.c.) for virus shedding detection and calculation of the protective rate of each vaccine. 【Result】 The CID50 of the four strains were 103.5 EID50/0.1 mL, 102.5 EID50/0.1 mL, 102.5 EID50/0.1 mL and 103.5 EID50/0.1 mL, respectively. At three weeks p.v., the mean HI antibodies titers against the commercial H9 subtype HI test antigen (CK/SH/10/2001) in 4 groups of vaccinated chickens ranged from 9.4 log2 to 11 log2, while the mean HI antibodies titers against challenge virus in 4 groups of vaccinated chickens ranged from 4.6 log2 to 10.8 log2, and the significant differences of HI antibodies titers were observed among different vaccine groups, for the maximum difference of mean HI antibodies titers were 64-fold among them. The mean NT antibodies titers against challenge virus in 4 groups of vaccinated chickens ranged from 6.7 log2 to 12.2 log2, while the maximum difference of mean HI antibodies titers were 32-fold among them, and the HI antibody and NT antibody of the control group were negative. After intranasal infection with different H9 viruses, the immune effects of the four vaccines were quite different. In CK/XJ/S1204/2015 challenged groups, 3 vaccines (B-D) could provide more than 80% protection. In DK/JX/S4512/2017 challenged groups, 1 vaccine (B) could provide more than 80% protection. In CK/YN/S1666/2020 challenged groups, 2 vaccines (A and B) could provide more than 80% protection. In CK/NX/S4590/2020 challenged groups, the protection efficacy of the four vaccines (A-D) were all less than 80%. In the same period, the virus shedding rate of chickens under the control group was more than 8/10. 【Conclusion】 There was a great difference in the immune protection efficacy of the four kinds of commercial vaccines after challenge with recently isolated H9 strains, and the difference of antigenicity between vaccine antigens and isolates was the main reason for the decrease of immune protection efficacy of the commercial vaccines. The titers of HI antibody and NT antibody against H9N2 prevalent strains could be as important data for evaluation of the commercial H9N2 AI vaccines. This study provided the scientific references for selection and usage of the commercial vaccines against H9N2 AI.

Key words: H9N2 subtype, AIV, commercial vaccine, protective efficacy, avian influenza

Table 1

The EID50, CID50 and TCID50 of the four H9N2 avian influenza viruses"

攻毒毒株 Virus 鸡胚半数感染量 EID50 鸡半数感染量 CID50 细胞半数感染量 TCID50
CK/XJ/S1204/2015 10-8.5/0.1 mL 103.5 EID50/0.1 mL 10-6.5/0.1 mL
DK/JX/S4512/2017 10-8.63/0.1 mL 102.5 EID50/0.1 mL 10-7.5/0.1 mL
CK/YN/S1666/2020 10-8.94/0.1 mL 102.5 EID50/0.1 mL 10-6.5/0.1 mL
CK/NX/S4590/2020 10-8.83/0.1 mL 103.5 EID50/0.1 mL 10-7.5/0.1 mL

Fig. 1

The HI antibody titers in groups of chickens immunized with different vaccines at 3 weeks post immunization"

Fig. 2

The NT antibody titers to challenge virus in groups of chickens immunized with different vaccines before challenge study"

Table 2

The results of virus shedding in the groups of chickens immunized with different vaccine after challenge"

攻毒毒株
Virus		 疫苗编号
Vaccine
number		 攻毒后3 d和5 d各组鸡排毒结果：排毒数/总数（Log10EID50/mL）
Virus shedding detection on days 3 and 5 post challenge(p.c.)
No. of chickens shedding virus/Total chickens (Log10EID50/mL)		 保护率
Protection
ratio
3 d 5 d
喉头 Oropharynx 泄殖腔 Cloaca 喉头 Oropharynx 泄殖腔 Cloaca
CK/XJ/S1204/2015 A 5/10（2.9） 3/10（3.3） 9/10（3.3） 3/10（2.1） 10%
B 0/10 0/10 2/10（2.9） 0/10 80%
C 2/10（2.9） 0/10 0/10 0/10 80%
D 0/10 0/10 1/10（3.0） 0/10 90%
PBS 10/10（4.3） 0/10 10/10（3.1） 5/10（3.0） /
DK/JX/S4512/2017 A 5/10（3.7） 0/10 10/10（4.9） 7/10（3.2） 0
B 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 100%
C 4/10（4.6） 3/10（2.3） 9/10（4.2） 7/10（3.1） 10%
D 3/10（4.9） 1/10（1.3） 10/10（4.6） 10/10（3.2） 0
PBS 10/10（5.9） 9/10（3.1） 10/10（5.0） 10/10（3.2） /
CK/YN/S1666/2020 A 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 100%
B 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 100%
C 10/10（5.5） 6/10（2.9） 7/10（4.9） 7/10（2.4） 0
D 3/10（4.5） 1/10（3.3） 6/10（5.5） 2/10（2.8） 40%
PBS 10/10（6.1） 8/10（2.9） 10/10（6.5） 9/10（3.1） /
CK/NX/S4590/2020 A 10/10（4.8） 4/10（2.4） 10/10（5.5） 9/10（3.1） 0
B 4/10（4.8） 2/10（2.4） 9/10（5.3） 4/10（3.2） 10%
C 10/10（4.9） 3/10（2.4） 10/10（5.4） 8/10（2.9） 0
D 8/10（4.7） 2/10（2.4） 10/10（5.5） 8/10（3.0） 0
PBS 10/10（6.3） 6/10（2.5） 10/10（6.6） 6/10（3.8） /

Table 3

Correlation between mean antibody titers and protective efficacy of commercial H9 AI vaccine in chickens"

疫苗编号
Vaccine number		 攻毒毒株
Challenge virus		 HI抗体效价
HI antibody titers
n=6（log2）		 中和抗体
NT antibody titers
n=6（log2）		 保护率
Protection ratio
CK/SH/10/2001 攻毒毒株 Challenge virus 攻毒毒株 Challenge virus
A CK/XJ/S1204/2015 9.3 9.3 8.9 10%
DK/JX/S4512/2017 10.2 5.3 6.7 0
CK/YN/S1666/2020 10.0 8.0 10.9 100%
CK/NX/S4590/2020 10.2 6.3 8.3 0
B CK/XJ/S1204/2015 10.2 10.2 11.1 80%
DK/JX/S4512/2017 9.8 9.8 10.0 100%
CK/YN/S1666/2020 10.3 10.8 12.2 100%
CK/NX/S4590/2020 9.3 8.6 8.4 10%
C CK/XJ/S1204/2015 9.5 9.5 10.0 80%
DK/JX/S4512/2017 10.5 8.0 8.8 10%
CK/YN/S1666/2020 9.5 4.6 7.6 0
CK/NX/S4590/2020 9.3 5.1 7.0 0
D CK/XJ/S1204/2015 10.8 10.8 10.9 90%
DK/JX/S4512/2017 11.0 7.0 8.4 0
CK/YN/S1666/2020 9.8 7.5 8.4 40%
CK/NX/S4590/2020 10.2 6.8 8.6 0

Table 4

Cross-reactive HI antibody titers of four H9 viruses with different antisera"

病毒
Virus		 血清交叉抗体滴度 Cross-reactive HI antibody titers of different antisera (log2)
CK/SH/10/2001 CK/XJ/S1204/2015 DK/JX/S4512/2017 CK/YN/S1666/2020 CK/NX/S4590/2020
CK/SH/10/2001 1024 256 256 64 64
CK/XJ/S1204/2015 256 256 32 16 32
DK/JX/S4512/2017 32 64 2048 128 64
CK/YN/S1666/2020 64 128 512 512 512
CK/NX/S4590/2020 64 128 256 128 512
[1]
GU M, XU L J, WANG X Q, LIU X F. Current situation of H9N2 subtype avian influenza in China. Veterinary Research, 2017, 48(1): 49.

doi: 10.1186/s13567-017-0453-2 pmid: 28915920
[2]
SUN Y P, LIU J H. H9N2 influenza virus in China: A cause of concern. Protein & Cell, 2015, 6(1): 18-25.
[3]
HOMME P J, EASTERDAY B C. Avian influenza virus infections. I. Characteristics of influenza A-Turkey-Wisconsin-1966 virus. Avian Diseases, 1970, 14(1): 66-74.

pmid: 4314007
[4]
陈伯伦, 张泽纪, 陈伟斌. 鸡A型禽流感病毒的分离与血清学初步鉴定. 中国家禽, 1997, 19(11): 3-5.
CHEN B L, ZHANG Z J, CHEN W B. Isolation and preliminary serological identification of avian influenza virus-type A from chickens. China Poultry, 1997, 19(11): 3-5. (in Chinese)
[5]
XIN L, BAI T, ZHOU J F, CHEN Y K, LI X D, ZHU W F, LI Y, TANG J, GUO J F, CHEN T, GAO R B, WANG D Y, SHU Y L. A comprehensive retrospective study of the seroprevalence of H9N2 avian influenza viruses in occupationally exposed populations in China. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(6): e0178328.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178328
[6]
LI C J, YU K Z, TIAN G B, YU D D, LIU L L, JING B, PING J H, CHEN H L. Evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses from domestic poultry in Mainland China. Virology, 2005, 340(1): 70-83.

pmid: 16026813
[7]
KONG L C, YOU R R, ZHANG D C, YUAN Q L, XIANG B, LIANG J P, LIN Q Y, DING C, LIAO M, CHEN L B, REN T. Infectious bronchitis virus infection increases pathogenicity of H9N2 avian influenza virus by inducing severe inflammatory response. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2022, 8: 824179.

doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.824179
[8]
AMANOLLAHI R, ASASI K, ABDI-HACHESOO B. Effect of Newcastle disease and infectious bronchitis live vaccines on the immune system and production parameters of experimentally infected broiler chickens with H9N2 avian influenza. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2020, 71: 101492.

doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101492
[9]
AWUNI J A, BIANCO A, DOGBEY O J, FUSARO A, YINGAR D T, SALVIATO A, ABABIO P T, MILANI A, BONFANTE F, MONNE I. Avian influenza H9N2 subtype in Ghana: Virus characterization and evidence of co-infection. Avian Pathology, 2019, 48(5): 470-476.

doi: 10.1080/03079457.2019.1624687 pmid: 31142135
[10]
ARAFAT N, ABD EL RAHMAN S, NAGUIB D, EL-SHAFEI R A, ABDO W, ELADL A H. Co-infection of Salmonella enteritidis with H9N2 avian influenza virus in chickens. Avian Pathology, 2020, 49(5): 496-506.

doi: 10.1080/03079457.2020.1778162
[11]
LI X Y, LIU B T, MA S J, CUI P F, LIU W Q, LI Y B, GUO J, CHEN H L. High frequency of reassortment after co-infection of chickens with the H4N6 and H9N2 influenza A viruses and the biological characteristics of the reassortants. Veterinary Microbiology, 2018, 222: 11-17.

doi: S0378-1135(17)31466-9 pmid: 30080665
[12]
LAHARIYA C, SHARMA A K, PRADHAN S K. Avian flu and possible human pandemic. Indian Pediatrics, 2006, 43(4): 317-325.

pmid: 16651670
[13]
GERHARD W, MOZDZANOWSKA K, ZHARIKOVA D. Prospects for universal influenza virus vaccine. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2006, 12(4): 569-574.

pmid: 16704803
[14]
ZHANG P H, TANG Y H, LIU X W, PENG D X, LIU W B, LIU H Q, LU S, LIU X F. Characterization of H9N2 influenza viruses isolated from vaccinated flocks in an integrated broiler chicken operation in Eastern China during a 5 year period (1998-2002). Journal of General Virology, 2008, 89(12): 3102-3112.

doi: 10.1099/vir.0.2008/005652-0
[15]
WU Z Q, JI J, ZUO K J, XIE Q M, LI H M, LIU J, CHEN F, XUE C Y, MA J Y, BI Y Z. Cloning and phylogenetic analysis of hemagglutinin gene of H9N2 subtype avian influenza virus from different isolates in China during 2002 to 2009. Poultry Science, 2010, 89(6): 1136-1143.

doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00695 pmid: 20460659
[16]
SHI J Z, DENG G H, MA S J, ZENG X Y, YIN X, LI M, ZHANG B, CUI P F, CHEN Y, YANG H L, WAN X P, LIU L L, CHEN P C, JIANG Y P, GUAN Y T, LIU J X, GU W L, HAN S Y, CHEN H L. Rapid evolution of H7N9 highly pathogenic viruses that emerged in China in 2017. Cell Host & Microbe, 2018, 24(4): 558-568.e7.
[17]
申伟霞. H9N2亚型禽流感病毒遗传演化分析及细胞灭活苗初步研制[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2014.
SHEN W X. The phylogenic analysis of H9N2 Subtype avian influenza virus and preliminary research of cellular inactivated vaccine[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese)
[18]
LI M, YIN X, GUAN L Z, ZHANG X, DENG G H, LI T, CUI P F, MA Y, HOU Y J, SHI J Z, CHEN H L. Insights from avian influenza surveillance of chickens and ducks before and after exposure to live poultry markets. Science China Life Sciences, 2019, 62(6): 854-857.

doi: 10.1007/s11427-019-9522-7
[19]
CUI P F, ZENG X Y, LI X Y, LI Y B, SHI J Z, ZHAO C H, QU Z Y, WANG Y W, GUO J, GU W L, MA Q, ZHANG Y C, LIN W P, LI M H, TIAN J M, WANG D X, XING X, LIU Y J, PAN S X, ZHANG Y P, BAO H M, LIU L L, TIAN G B, LI C J, DENG G H, CHEN H L. Genetic and biological characteristics of the globally circulating H5N8 avian influenza viruses and the protective efficacy offered by the poultry vaccine currently used in China. Science China Life Sciences, 2022, 65(4): 795-808.

doi: 10.1007/s11427-021-2025-y
[20]
SUN Y P, PU J, FAN L H, SUN H L, WANG J J, ZHANG Y, LIU L Q, LIU J H. Evaluation of the protective efficacy of a commercial vaccine against different antigenic groups of H9N2 influenza viruses in chickens. Veterinary Microbiology, 2012, 156(1/2): 193-199.

doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.003
[21]
ZHENG Y Q, GUO Y N, LI Y F, LIANG B, SUN X Y, LI S J, XIA H Z, PING J H. The molecular determinants of antigenic drift in a novel avian influenza A (H9N2) variant virus. Virology Journal, 2022, 19(1): 26.

doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01755-9 pmid: 35123509
[22]
PEACOCK T H P, JAMES J, SEALY J E, IQBAL M. A global perspective on H9N2 avian influenza virus. Viruses, 2019, 11(7): 620.

doi: 10.3390/v11070620
[23]
JIANG W M, LIU S, HOU G Y, LI J P, ZHUANG Q Y, WANG S C, ZHANG P, CHEN J M. Chinese and global distribution of H9 subtype avian influenza viruses. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(12): e52671.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052671
[24]
SUN Y P, PU J, JIANG Z L, GUAN T, XIA Y J, XU Q, LIU L Q, MA B, TIAN F L, BROWN E G, LIU J H. Genotypic evolution and antigenic drift of H9N2 influenza viruses in China from 1994 to 2008. Veterinary Microbiology, 2010, 146(3/4): 215-225.

doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.010
[25]
ZHANG Y, YIN Y B, BI Y H, WANG S C, XU S Z, WANG J L, ZHOU S, SUN T T, YOON K J. Molecular and antigenic characterization of H9N2 avian influenza virus isolates from chicken flocks between 1998 and 2007 in China. Veterinary Microbiology, 2012, 156(3/4): 285-293.

doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.11.014
[26]
中华人民共和国农业部. 兽用生物制品质量标准汇编(2006-2008)上册, 2009, 3: 107-112.
Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China. Quality Standards of Veterinary Biological Products(2006-2008) Booklet, 2009, 3: 107-112. (in Chinese)
[27]
YANG J M, CUI H R, TENG Q Y, MA W J, LI X S, WANG B B, YAN D W, CHEN H J, LIU Q F, LI Z J. Ducks induce rapid and robust antibody responses than chickens at early time after intravenous infection with H9N2 avian influenza virus. Virology Journal, 2019, 16(1): 46.

doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1150-8 pmid: 30975159
[28]
石文军, 曾显营, 臧金凯, 吴姣姣, 白洁, 陈化兰, 田国彬. 不同攻毒剂量对评估H9亚型禽流感疫苗免疫效果的影响. 中国预防兽医学报, 2017, 39(4): 301-305.
SHI W J, ZENG X Y, ZANG J K, WU J J, BAI J, CHEN H L, TIAN G B. Different challenge doses influence the immunity efficacy evaluation of H9 subtype avian influenza virus. Chinese Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2017, 39(4): 301-305. (in Chinese)
[29]
GAUGER P C, VINCENT A L. Serum virus neutralization assay for detection and quantitation of serum neutralizing antibodies to influenza A virus in swine. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N J), 2020, 2123: 321-333.
[1] WEI JingJie,JIANG NingBo,LIANG Yan,ZHANG Qian,SUN YingJian,HU Ge. Effect of Matrine on NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling Pathway in H9N2 AIV Infected Mice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4315-4326.
[2] WANG YanWen,WANG MengJing,ZHANG Hong,GAO XinXin,GUO Jing,LI XuYong. Evolution of Human H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus in China from 1998 to 2021 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4075-4090.
[3] SUN Ying,ZHANG Bing,LI Ling,HUANG XiaoJie,HOU LiDan,LIU Dan,LI QiHong,LI JunPing,WANG LeYuan,LI HuiJiao,YANG ChengHuai. Construction of a Recombinant Duck Enteritis Virus Expressing Hemagglutinin of H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4398-4405.
[4] LI Li, DU XIN, ZHANG LiNa, YANG Liu, GAO XiaoQing, TANG DongXue, ZHAO HaiYuan, JIANG XiaoMei, ZHANG TianShu, LI JinXiang. Optimization of Cultivation Conditions for Reassortant Avian Influenza Virus H7N9 H7-Re1 Strain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(17): 3415-3426.
[5] CHEN Hong, YANG Liu, SONG HaiYan, SHI Ying, MENG LingWei, FU ChunJie, Zhang Dan, ZHAO HaiYuan, LI JinXiang, JIANG XiaoMei, ZHANG TianShu. Domestication of Suspended MDCK Cells and Cultivation of H5 Subtype Avian Influenza Virus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(17): 3405-3414.
[6] YANG JinSong, WU Tao, LI JinXiang. Quality Analysis and Development Direction of Recombinant Avian Influenza Inactivated Vaccine (H5 subtype) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(17): 3397-3404.
[7] QI Wen-bao, LI Fang, LI Hua-nan, HUANG Li-hong, HE Jun, MU Guang-hui, LUO Kai-jian, LIAO Ming. Electrochemical Luminescence Immunoassay for the Detection of H9 Subtype Avian Influenza Virus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(15): 3064-3070.
[8] DING Jie, GAO Yu-wei, SANG Xiao-yu, CHENG Kai-hui, YU Zhi-jun, ZHANG Kun, CHAI Hong-liang, WANG Tie-cheng, XIA Xian-zhu, HUA Yu-ping. The Adaptation of H9N2 Subtype AIV in Mouse and Analysis of Amino Acid Mutation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(15): 3056-3063.
[9] WANG Yun-he, BAO Hong-mei, SUN Jia-shan, LI Yan-bing, XU Xiao-long, WANG Zi-long, SHI Jian-zhong, ZENG Xian-ying, WANG Xiu-rong, CHEN Hua-lan. Development of RT-PCR Technique for Detection of H7N9 Subtype Avian Influenza Virus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(15): 3050-3055.
[10] ZHAO Qing-qing, LI Qun-hui, ZHU Jie, ZHONG Lei, LIU Jing-jing, GU Min, WANG Xiao-quan, LIU Wen-bo, LIU Xiu-fan. Genome Sequencing and Genetic Analysis of H4N8 Subtype Avian Influenza Virus Isolated from Duck [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(15): 3040-3049.
[11] HAN Jin-Huan, GOU Hui-Tian, SHANG Qing-Yan, SUN Xiao-Lin. Prokaryotic Expression and Protective Efficacy of TPO18 Gene from Taenia pisiformis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(15): 3077-3084.
[12] DING Pei-Pei, LIU Yue-Huan, CHEN Ming-Yong, HAN Chun-Hua, LIN Jian, HAN Jing-Wen, PAN Jie. Study on the Susceptibility of Turtledoves to Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H9N2 and its Receptor [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2482-2490.
[13] CHEN Lu, LIU Shou-Chuan, ZHAO Jun, WANG Chuan-Qing, WANG Ze-Lin. Characteristics of Pathogenic and HA Antigenic Variation of H9N2 Subtybe Avian Influenza Viruses Isolated from 1998 to 2008 in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(24): 5100-5107.
[14] HUANG Yan-yan,HU Bei-xia,WEN Xin-tian,CAO San-jie,XU Dong,ZHANG Xiu-mei
. Evolution Analysis of the PB1-F2 Genes of Influenza A Viruses Isolated from China
 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(6): 2156-2163 .
[15]

. Development of Colloidal Gold Strip for Differentiating Antibody of AIV-Infected Flocks from Vaccinated Ones
 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(2): 694-700 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd