低温对甘薯淀粉理化特性及代谢关键基因表达量的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.19.012

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Starch is the main component of sweetpotatoe, and the main use of tuberous roots is directly determined by the physicochemical properties of starch. Sweetpotato is a typical temperature-preferred tropical crop and sensitive to the storage temperature. Therefore, it is very important to study the effects of low temperature on starch physicochemical properties for the safe storage of sweetpotato. 【Method】 The starch average granule size and distribution, heat enthalpy, gelatinization properties, moisture absorption and swelling power were investigated in an experiment conducted by using Yanshu 25 and Shangshu 19 with storage of 13℃ (CK) and 4℃ (Low temperature, LT) for 14 days. 【Result】 The results demonstrated that the significant differences were observed in amylose/amylopectin content between the two sweetpotato varieties. The amylose content of Shangshu 19 (31.47%) was significantly higher than that of Yanshu 25 (25.86%), while the amylopectin content showed an opposite trend. The average particle size, volume and surface area of Yanshu 25 and Shangshu 19 ranged from ≤2.50 μm, 2.50-5.00 μm to 5.00-25.00 μm, respectively. The average particle size, volume and surface area of starch particles, moisture absorption and swelling power were decreased under LT stress. The starch initial temperature (T0), peak temperature (Tp) and heat thermal value (△H) of Yanshu 25 and Shangshu 19 during gelatinization process were decreased significantly as compared with CK. The change in starch △H of Yanshu 25 was higher than that of Shangshu 19, which indicated that the effect of low temperature on thermal properties of Yanshu 25 starch was more serious than that of Shangshu 19. Under low temperature storage conditions, the peak viscosity (PKV), disintegration value (BDV) and recovery value (CSV) of Yanshu 25 and Shangshu 19 were decreased significantly, while the gelatinization temperature (PT) was not significantly affected by temperature. The differences between the two varieties were significant. The expression levels of IbAGPa, IbAGPb, IbSBEI and bSBEII genes were decreased significantly under LT condition, while Ibα-amylase and Ibβ-amylase increased significantly. 【Conclusion】 In conclusion, the temperature played an important role in the starch physicochemical properties of sweetpotato, and the change of which was closely related to the storage temperature.

Key words: sweetpotato, low temperature stress, starch, physicochemical properties, gene

CUI Peng,ZHAO YiRen,YAO ZhiPeng,PANG LinJiang,LU GuoQuan. Starch Physicochemical Properties and Expression Levels of Anabolism Key Genes in Sweetpotato Under Low Temperature[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3831-3840.

Figures/Tables 9

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

References 32

[1]	王欣, 李强, 曹清河, 马代夫. 中国甘薯产业和种业发展现状与未来展望. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3): 483-492. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.03.003. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.03.003
	WANG X, LI Q, CAO Q H, MA D F. Current status and future prospective of sweetpotato production and seed industry in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3): 483-492. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.03.003. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.03.003
[2]	ZHOU W Z, YANG J, HONG Y, LIU G L, ZHENG J L, GU Z B, ZHANG P. Impact of amylose content on starch physicochemical properties in transgenic sweet potato. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2015, 122: 417-427. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.003. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.003 pmid: 25817686
[3]	ZHANG K, WU Z D, TANG D B, LUO K, LU H X, LIU Y Y, DONG J, WANG X, LV C W, WANG J C, LU K. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals critical function of sucrose metabolism related- enzymes in starch accumulation in the storage root of sweet potato. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 914. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00914
[4]	HOOVER R. Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches: A review. Carbohydrate Polymer, 2001, 45(3): 253-267. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00260-5
[5]	谭洪卓, 谭斌, 刘明, 田晓红, 谷文英. 甘薯淀粉性质与其粉丝品质的关系. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(4): 286-292.
	TAN H Z, TAN B, LIU M, TIAN X H, GU W Y. Relationship between properties of sweet potato starch and qualities of sweet potato starch noodles. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(4): 286-292. (in Chinese)
[6]	ZHU F, WANG S N. Physicochemical properties, molecular structure, and uses of sweetpotato starch. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2014, 36(2): 68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.01.008
[7]	NODA T, KOBAYASHI T, SUDA I. Effect of soil temperature on starch properties of sweet potatoes. Carbohydrate Polymer, 2001, 44(3): 239-246. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(00)00227-7
[8]	唐忠厚, 李洪民, 张爱君, 史新敏, 徐飞, 孙健. 施钾对甘薯常规品质性状及其淀粉RVA特性的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(1): 46-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2011.01.009. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2011.01.009
	TANG Z H, LI H M, ZHANG A J, SHI X M, XU F, SUN J. Effect of potassium fertilizer application on main quality traits and starch RVA characters of sweetpotato. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2011, 23(1): 46-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2011.01.009. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2011.01.009
[9]	柳洪鹃, 姚海兰, 史春余, 张立明. 施钾时期对甘薯济徐23块根淀粉积累与品质的影响及酶学生理机制. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(1): 43-52. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.005. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.005
	LIU H J, YAO H L, SHI C Y, ZHANG L M. Effect of potassium application time on starch accumulation and related enzyme activities of sweet potato variety Jixu 23. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(1): 43-52. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.005. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.005
[10]	唐忠厚, 张爱君, 陈晓光, 靳容, 刘明, 李洪民, 丁艳锋. 低钾胁迫对甘薯块根淀粉理化特性的影响及其基因型差异. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(3): 513-525.
	TANG Z H, ZHANG A J, CHEN X G, JIN R, LIU M, LI H M, DING Y F. Starch physico-chemical properties and their difference in three sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas(L.) lam) genotypes under low potassium stress. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(3): 513-525. (in Chinese)
[11]	解则义, 李洪民, 马代夫, 陈天娇, 韩永华, 李宗芸. 低温胁迫影响甘薯贮藏的研究进展. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(5): 758-767.
	XIE Z Y, LI H M, MA D F, CHEN T J, HAN Y H, LI Z Y. Research progress of the effects of low temperature stress on the sweetpotato during storage. Plant Physiology Journal, 2017, 53(5): 758-767. (in Chinese)
[12]	LI X, YANG H Q, LU G Q. Low-temperature conditioning combined with cold storage inducing rapid sweetening of sweetpotato tuberous roots (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) while inhibiting chilling injury. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2018, 142: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.04.002
[13]	CHAUDHARY P R, JAYAPRAKASHA G K, PORAT R, PATIL B S. Low temperature conditioning reduces chilling injury while maintaining quality and certain bioactive compounds of ‘Star Ruby’ grapefruit. Food Chemistry, 2014, 153: 243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.043. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.12.043
[14]	JIN P, ZHANG Y, SHAN T, HUANG Y, XU J, ZHENG Y. Low-temperature conditioning alleviates chilling injury in loquat fruit and regulates glycine betaine content and energy status. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2015, 63(14): 3654-3659. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00605. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b00605 pmid: 25822129
[15]	江凌峰, 周淑倩, 潘靖禹, 杨虎清, 陆国权, 李永新. 不同贮藏时间及温度对新鲜甘薯淀粉特性的影响. 中国粮油学报. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2864.TS.20210609.1743.014.html.
	JIANG L F, ZHOU S Q, PAN J Y, YANG H Q, LU G Q, LI Y X. Effect of different storage time and temperature on starch properties of fresh sweet potato. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2864.TS.20210609.1743.014.html. (in Chinese)
[16]	SHIMADA T, OTANI M, HAMADA T, KIM S H. Increase of amylose content of sweetpotato starch by RNA interference of the starch branching enzyme II gene (IbSBEII). Plant Biotechnology, 2006, 23(1): 85-90. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.23.85
[17]	唐忠厚, 朱晓倩, 李强, 李洪民, 徐飞. 不同基因型甘薯直链淀粉含量差异研究. 食品工业科技, 2011, 32(11): 108-110.
	TANG Z H, ZHU X Q, LI Q, LI H M, XU F. Genotype variation in amylose content of sweetpotato. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2011, 32(11): 108-110. (in Chinese)
[18]	RASPER V. Investigations on starches from major starch crops grown in Ghana: III.-Particle size and particle size distribution. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1971, 22(11): 572-580. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740221105
[19]	YI J, KERR W L, JOHNSON J W. Effects of waxy wheat flour and water on frozen dough and bread properties. Journal of Food Science, 2009, 74(5): E278-E284. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01180.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01180.x
[20]	SILVAS-GARCIA M I, RAMIREZ-WONG B, TORRES-CHAVEZ P I, BELLO P, LUIS A, CARVAJAL M, Elizabeth, BARRON H, JESUS M, RODRIGUEZ G, MARIO E, VASQUEZ L, VAZQUEZ-LARA F, QUINTERO-RAMOS A. Effect of freezing rate and storage on the rheological, thermal and structural properties of frozen wheat dough starch. Starch-Stärke, 2016, 68(11/12): 1103-1110. doi: 10.1002/star.201500123
[21]	史春余, 姚海兰, 张立明, 柳洪鹃, 张超, 刘桂玲. 不同类型甘薯品种块根淀粉粒粒度的分布特征. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(21): 4537-4543.
	SHI C Y, YAO H L, ZHANG L M, LIU H J, ZHANG C, LIU G L. Starch Granule size distribution in storage roots of different types of sweetpotato cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(21): 4537-4543. (in Chinese)
[22]	PYCIA K, JUSZCZSK L, GALKOWSKA D, WITCZAK M. Physicochemical properties of starches obtained from Polish potato cultivars. Starch-Starke, 2012, 64(2): 105-114. doi: 10.1002/star.201100072
[23]	BHASKAR P B, WU L, BUSSE J S, WHITTY B R, HAMERNIK A J, JANSKY S H, BUELL C R, BETHKE P C, JIANG J. Suppression of the vacuolar invertase gene prevents cold-induced sweetening in potato. Plant Physiology, 2010, 154(2): 939-948. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.162545. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.162545 pmid: 20736383
[24]	CHARLES M T, MAKHLOUF J, ARUL J. Physiological basis of UV-C induced resistance to Botrytis cinereal in tomato fruit: II. Modification of fruit surface and changes in fungal colonization. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 47(1): 21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.05.014
[25]	COLEBROOK E H, THOMAS S G, PHILLIPS A L, HEDDEN P. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014, 217(1): 67-75. doi: 10.1242/jeb.089938. doi: 10.1242/jeb.089938
[26]	COOLS K, ALAMAR M D C, TERRY L A. Controlling sprouting in potato tubers using ultraviolet-irradiance. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2014, 98(1): 106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.07.005
[27]	PESHEV D, VAN DEN ENDE W. Sugars as antioxidants in plants// Crop Improvement Under Adverse Conditions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2013: 285-308.
[28]	VAN DEN ENDE W, VALLURU R. Sucrose, sucrosyl oligosaccharides, and oxidative stress: Scavenging and salvaging? Journal of Experimental Botany, 2008, 60(1): 9-18. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern297. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern297
[29]	BOLOURI-MOGHADDAM M R, LE ROY K, XIANG L, ROLLAND F, VAN DEN ENDE W. Sugar signalling and antioxidant network connections in plant cells. The FEBS Journal, 2010, 277(9): 2022-2037. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07633.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07633.x
[30]	KEUNEN E, PESHEV D, VANGRONSVELD J, VAN DEN ENDE W, CUYPERS A. Plant sugars are crucial players in the oxidative challenge during abiotic stress: Extending the traditional concept. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2013, 36(7): 1242-1255. doi: 10.1111/pce.12061. doi: 10.1111/pce.12061
[31]	SPERDOULI I, MOUSTAKAS M. Interaction of proline, sugars, and anthocyanins during photosynthetic acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2012, 169(6): 577-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.015. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.015
[32]	CUI P, LI Y, CUI C, HUO Y, LU G, YANG H. Proteomic and metabolic profile analysis of low-temperature storage responses in Ipomoea batata Lam. tuberous roots. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20(1): 435. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02642-7. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02642-7

Related Articles 15

[1]	PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2^# and Changbai7^# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	LI YuanJing, YUAN RuiXiang, LI YongTai, SUN TianGe, LIU Feng, LI YanJun, ZHANG XinYu. Identification and Functional Characterization of β-Glucosidase Genes in Verticillium dahliae for Pathogenicity on Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1380-1399.
[3]	LU XueLi, GILLANI SyedaWajeeha, MENG Chen, LI XiaoBin, SONG YiRu, BAI Yu, WANG JuYing, FENG XiaoFei, LIU ChenChen, LI YiQiang, XU ZongChang. Effects of Different Types of Salt Stress on Seed Germination of Pennisetum alopecuroides and Study on Sodium-Regulated Transcriptome [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1400-1419.
[4]	MIAO JiaHao, CUI PengFei, YAN Cheng, WANG CongCong, WANG Yan, CHEN Yuan, CHEN Peng, SHI JianZhong, DENG GuoHua, CHEN HuaLan. Genetic and Biological Characterization of Two H8N4 Subtype Avian Influenza Viruses Isolated from Duck [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1576-1586.
[5]	ZHAO ZiJie, SONG Hao, DONG XiaoOu, WAN JianMin. Progress in Transposable Element-Assisted Targeted Insertion of Large DNA Fragments [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1141-1156.
[6]	YE MeJin, WU Lei, MD NAHIBUZZAMAN Lohani, YIN Li, HU XinRong, LIU YaXi, JIANG YunFeng, CHEN GuoYue, PU ZhiEn, LI Yang, LI Ting, ZOU YaYa, WU JiaYi, MA Jian. Genome-Wide Association Study-Based Identification of Loci Controlling Mature Embryo Size in Chinese Wheat Landraces and Their Genetic Effects Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1157-1171.
[7]	WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[8]	LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[9]	WU YuanYuan, LÜ ShuWen, ZHANG ZiJun, WANG Tao, ZHANG YiMing, BU LingChao, ZOU QingDao, JIANG Jing. Mixed Major Gene+Polygene Genetic Analysis of Blossom-End Scar Size in Tomato Fruit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1060-1069.
[10]	JIAO WenJuan, HE WanLong, GENG HongWei, BAI Bin, LI JianFeng, CHENG YuKun. Stripe Rust Resistance Evaluation and Molecular Characterization of Yr Genes for 155 Spring Wheat Varieties (Lines) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 937-950.
[11]	DONG JinLong, ZHAO Ying, YU HaiBing, LÜ JianYe, QIN JiaQi, LIANG Chen, MING Bo, LI ShaoKun. Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[12]	YANG Fan, HU XiaoQian, WANG Yu, YUE CaiXia, ZHANG Rui, TIAN Wen, WANG TingTing, LI Yang, JI MeiQuan, ZHANG LiHui, AN KeJing. Optimization of Detection Conditions for Aerobic Spore-Forming Bacillus in Honey and Analysis of Its Contamination Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 887-899.
[13]	CUI ShiYou, CHEN PengJun, MIAO YuanQing, HAN JiJun, SHEN JunMing. Development and Field Evaluation of Glyphosate-Resistant Wheat Germplasm Generated Through EMS Mutagenesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 723-733.
[14]	LUO ZhengYing, HU SiZhen, LIN XiuQin, HU Xin, ZHANG Min, XU ChaoHua, LIU XinLong, ZENG QianChun. Identification and Functional Characterization of the PEBP Gene Family in Regulating Flowering Time in Saccharum spontaneum and Saccharum officinarum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 734-749.
[15]	JIANG Feng, WU ChunYan, WANG YiHao, YANG ZeZhong, GONG Cheng, LUO Chen. Identification and Expression Analysis of the Fatty Acid Elongase Gene Family in Bemisia tabaci MED [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 793-806.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

引物名称 Primer name	引物序列（5′-3′） Primer sequence (5′-3′)
Actin-F	ATGATAACTCGACGGATCGC
Actin-R	CTTGGATGTGGTAGCCGTTT
IbAGPa-F	TCGACGGTGATGTTAGCAAG
IbAGPa -R	AACAGCCTTTGGAGAAACGA
IbSBEI-F	GGTTTACGGGTCTTGATGGA
IbSBEI-R	AACAGCCTGCTATCCCACAC
IbSBEII-F	CTTCCCTGAAGCCATAACCA
IbSBEII-R	CCATTTGCCAATCCTCATCT
Ibα-amlyas-F	CTGCATTTTTGTTCCTGCAA
Ibα-amlyas-R	TTCGATGCGTCCAAGTCATA
Ibβ-amlyase-F	AGACTGGAAGGAGGCTGTGA
Ibβ-amlyase-R	TGTTGGCTTCTTCGAGGACT

品种 Variety	储藏温度 Storage temperature (℃)	直链淀粉 Amylose (%)	支链淀粉 Amylopectin (%)	氮 Nitrogen (%)	磷 Phosphorus (%)	总脂肪 Total lipid (%)
烟薯25 Yanshu 25	13 (CK)	25.86±0.06b	68.82±0.03a	2.11±0.01b	1.45±0.007c	1.76±0.006b
烟薯25 Yanshu 25	4 (LT)	24.22±0.04b	67.59±0.05a	2.89±0.008a	2.68±0.003a	2.62±0.005a
商薯19 Shangshu 19	13 (CK)	31.47±0.02a	65.36±0.04b	1.13±0.007c	1.66±0.008c	0.38±0.008c
商薯19 Shangshu 19	4 (LT)	30.11±0.03a	64.87±0.07b	2.25±0.009b	2.09±0.005b	0.68±0.008c

品种 Variety	储藏温度 Storage temperature (℃)	淀粉粒径及其体积分布Granule diameter and volume frequency percent
		≤2.50 μm		2.50—5.00 μm		5.00—25.00 μm
		百分比 Percent (%)	平均粒径 Average granule diameter	百分比 Percent (%)	平均粒径 Average granule diameter	百分比 Percent (%)	平均粒径 Average granule diameter
烟薯25 Yanshu 25	13 (CK)	12.05b	1.67±0.05a	6.24b	4.13±0.02a	81.71b	16.21±0.04a
烟薯25 Yanshu 25	4 (LT)	10.41c	1.53±0.03b	6.62b	3.94±0.03a	82.97a	13.66±0.03b
商薯19 Shangshu 19	13 (CK)	11.75b	1.83±0.04a	8.54b	4.07±0.02a	79.71c	14.72±0.03b
商薯19 Shangshu 19	4 (LT)	14.93a	1.72±0.04a	10.90a	3.81±0.02a	74.17d	16.93±0.02a

品种 Variety	储藏温度 Storage temperature (℃)	淀粉粒径及其表面积分布Granule diameter and surface area frequency percent
		≤2.50 μm		2.50—5.00 μm		5.00—25.00 μm
		百分比 Percent (%)	平均粒径 Average granule diameter	百分比 Percent (%)	平均粒径 Average granule diameter	百分比 Percent (%)	平均粒径 Average granule diameter
烟薯25 Yanshu 25	13 (CK)	52.31b	1.84±0.04b	6.88b	4.64±0.06a	40.81a	18.66±0.03a
烟薯25 Yanshu 25	4 (LT)	51.23b	2.02±0.03a	7.34b	4.37±0.07b	41.43a	15.21±0.07b
商薯19 Shangshu 19	13 (CK)	55.63a	2.11±0.05a	8.28a	4.58±0.06a	36.09b	16.03±0.05b
商薯19 Shangshu 19	4 (LT)	54.01a	1.93±0.05b	9.12a	4.31±0.05b	36.87b	17.71±0.04a

品种 Varieties	储藏温度 Storage temperature (℃)	热焓值 △H (J·g^-1)	起始温度 T₀ (℃)	峰值温度 Tp (℃)	终止温度 Tc (℃)
烟薯25 Yanshu 25	13 (CK)	14.56±0.11a	62.52±0.24a	71.14±0.04a	82.15±0.34a
烟薯25 Yanshu 25	4 (LT)	14.25±0.12b	58.11±0.18b	69.67±0.13b	82.94±0.12a
商薯19 Shangshu 19	13 (CK)	14.41±0.09a	63.02±0.19a	72.34±0.22a	83.05±0.19a
商薯19 Shangshu 19	4 (LT)	14.17±0.06b	61.91±0.12b	70.33±0.19b	82.64±0.28a

Starch Physicochemical Properties and Expression Levels of Anabolism Key Genes in Sweetpotato Under Low Temperature

RichHTML

PDF