Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (2): 317-331.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.02.007

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research Progress of SOC Functions and Transformation Mechanisms

ZHANG WeiLi1,KOLBE H2,ZHANG RenLian1   

  1. 1 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    2 Sächsische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Waldheimer Straße 219, D-01683 Nossen, Germany
  • Received:2019-06-03 Accepted:2019-09-02 Online:2020-01-16 Published:2020-02-17

Abstract:

Up to end of last century, studies on SOC were mainly concentrated in identifying chemical structures of different organic materials in soil, such as structural characteristics of humic or fulvic acids and their related functions for soil quality. In recent years, focus on SOC has been laid on SOC transformation characteristics in soil, trying to establish the relationship between SOC functions and the grouping according to SOC transformation characteristics. According to the transformation properties, SOC can be divided into two groups, including the stable SOC and the active SOC. The first one refers mainly to the SOC closely combined with clay or fine silt and it is difficult to be decomposed and mineralized by soil microorganisms. Stable SOC belongs to passive and inert SOC pool in soil. The second one refers to SOC, which mainly consists of crop residues and roots after harvesting, crop straws returned to farmland and organic manures applied. The active SOC belongs to nutritive and labile SOC pool in soil. This part of SOC is of great importance to soil fertility. SOC concentration is actually the expression of dynamic equilibrium of two processes. One is the input of organic materials to soil and the other one is the decomposition and mineralization of SOC. When the amount of organic material input is less than the mineralized amount, the SOC concentration and soil fertility will decrease. When the annual input of organic carbon is greater than the annual mineralization amount, the SOC concentration will keep rising until the annual input is equal to the annual mineralized amount. At this moment, SOC concentration will no longer increase and reaches the equilibrium point. Under normal agricultural production conditions, the duration for reaching equilibrium point needs 20 to 30 years. If the active SOC input is in very high level, the dynamic equilibrium system will also lead to a high amount of SOC mineralization annually. In such case, it might lead to a loss of mineral nutrients from soil into water and atmospheric environments, especially mineral nitrogen loss. For the purposes of soil fertility improvement and environmental protection, the active SOC input for farmland should be controlled to the level equal to the annual SOC mineralization amount, sustaining the so-called balance with positive zero. New research shows that the active SOC, after entering soil, is decomposed into a series of short-chain chemical compounds by soil organisms. These short-chain chemical compounds combine with soil mineral particles and form soil organic-mineral aggregates through bioturbation. A lot of soil fertility properties are positively affected by formation of these aggregates. Influenced by humification, decomposition and other processes of SOC, aggregation and disaggregation in soil occur simultaneously and consistently. In order to maintain stability of the total aggregates in soil and to increase soil fertility, sustained and abundant active SOC should be inputted to soil. Variation of SOC concentration depends mainly on climate, soil texture and land use forms. Among the artificial influences, land use form changing has the greatest impact on SOC concentration. In comparison, farming managements, such as fertilization, straw returning, tillage and crop rotation, have much less impacts on SOC concentration. In arable land, crops with different growth periods, tillage and harvesting managements will produce different amounts of above ground residues and root residues after harvesting. Depending on residue quantity and quality, different crops are of different capacity for SOC reproduction. According to the differentiated SOC reproduction capacities, field crops can be divided into two types: SOC increasing crops and SOC consuming crops. For farmland with SOC consuming crops, it is very important to introduce SOC increasing crops in rotation or to apply organic manure or organic materials to field, in order to sustain soil fertility.

Key words: SOC, active SOC, soil fertility, SOC transformation mechanisms, crop rotation

Fig. 1

SOC grouping and its moving mechanism based on soil transformation rate"

Fig. 2

SOC accumulation, decomposition and transformation when the same amount of organic material inputed into soil annually"

Fig. 3

Time required for decomposition of different organic materials in soil"

Fig. 4

Two models of soil aggregates formed with soil humus A Model: Soil aggregates are formed by combination of long-chain humic acids with soil particles. B Model: Soil aggregates are composed of various short-chain substances produced by humification, such as polysaccharides (black), polypeptides (blue), aliphatic compounds (green) and polycyclic lignin fragments (brown). These short-chain substances are combined with soil mineral particles by cations (red) to form aggregates"

Table 1

Effects of organic matter supply from low to balanced grade on soil quality"

土壤质量性状Soil quality property 相对变化范围 Relative increase (%)
物理性状 Physical property
土壤容重 Soil bulk density -13—-3
土壤孔隙度 Soil porosity 1—3.5
土壤团聚体稳定性 Soil aggregates stability 8—34
土壤中大孔隙所占比例 Ratio of macropore to total porosity 8—11
土壤入渗水量 Infiltrated water amount 27—80
土壤水容量 Soil water capacity 3—4
土壤田间持水量(砂质土)Field water holding capacity (sandy soil) 23—28
土壤田间持水量(黏质土)Field water holding capacity (clay soil) 13—15
化学性状 Chemical property
有机碳和总氮含量 SOC & total nitrogen contents 30
土壤可矿化氮量 Soil mineralizable nitrogen content 26—33
土壤阳离子代换量(砂质土)Cation exchange capacity (sandy soil) 20
土壤阳离子代换量(黏质土)Cation exchange capacity (clay soil) 10
生物性状 Biological property
土壤微生物总生物量 Total soil microbial biomass 6—50
蚯蚓密度 Earthworm density 38—40
作物平均产量 Average crop yield increase 10—33
作物最大增产 Maximum crop yield increase 123—127

Table 2

Soil organic matter content (0—20 cm soil depth) in Germany"

分级
Grade
分级释义
Grade interpretation
有机质
OM (g·kg-1)
换算系数
Conversion coefficient
有机碳
SOC (Corg g·kg-1)
1 很低 Very low <10 1.724 <5.8
2 低 Low 10—20 1.724 5.8—11.5
3 中 Medium 20—40 1.724 11.6—23.1
4 较高 A little high 40—80 1.724 23.2—46.3
5 很高 Very high 80—150 1.724 46.4—86.9
6 极端高 Extremely high 150—300 2 87.0—150.0
7 泥炭土 Peat soil >300 2 >150.0

Table 3

Soil Organic matter content (0—30 cm soil depth) in China"

分级
Grade
分级释义
Grade interpretation
有机质
OM (g·kg-1)
换算系数
Conversion coefficient
有机碳
SOC (Corg g·kg-1)
占陆域面积
Ratio to land area (%)
1 很低 Very low ≤5 1.724 ≤2.9 5
2 低 Low 5—10 1.724 2.9—5.8 24
3 较低 A little low 10—15 1.724 5.8—8.7 18
4 中 Medium 15—25 1.724 8.7—14.5 19
5 较高 A little high 25—35 1.724 14.5—20.3 9
6 高 High 35—45 1.724 20.3—26.1 16
7 很高 Very high >45 1.724 >26.1 6

Table 4

Soil organic matter content of different land use forms in Germany"

土地利用类型 Land use form 土壤有机质 Soil OM (g·kg-1)
草地 Grass land 40—150
林地 Forestry land 20—80
耕地 Arable land 10—40

Fig. 5

Effects of soil texture composition on SOC content"

Fig. 6

Interaction of soil texture and rainfall on SOC content"

Fig. 7

Plant and root residue amounts after harvesting of different crops"

Fig. 8

Humus equivalent (Heq) of different crops"

Fig. 9

Humus equivalent (Heq) of different organic manures and materials"

[1] SCHMIDT W I M, TORN M, ABIVEN S, DITTMAR T, GUGGENBERGER G, JANSSENS I A, KLEBER M, KNABNER I K, LEHMANN J, MANNING D A C, NANNIPIER P, RASSET D, WEINERTO S, TRUMBORE S E . Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 2011,478:49-56.
[2] KOERSCHENS M . Der organische Kohlenstoff im Boden (corg) - Bedeutung, Bestimmung, Bewertung. Archives Agronomy Soil Science, 2010,56:375-392.
[3] KOLBE H, SCHLIEPHAKE W, MUELLER P . Ernte- und Wurzelrückstände und Nährstoffgehalte der Fruchtarten, Nährstoffgehalte organischer Düngemittel sowie Abbauverhalten von organischen Materialien im Boden//Parameterdatensätze von organischen Materialien. Dresden,Germany: Landwirtschaft und Geologie, 2019: 1-89. (in Germany)
KOLBE H, W SCHLIEPHAKE & P MUELLER . Ernte- und Wurzelrückstände und Nährstoffgehalte der Fruchtarten, Nährstoffgehalte organischer Düngemittel sowie Abbauverhalten von organischen Materialien im Boden. In: Parameterdatensätze von organischen Materialien. Schriftenreihe des Landesamtes fuer Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie, 2019: 1-89. (in Germany)
[4] SAUERBECK D . Funktion, Güte und Belastbarkeit des Bodens aus agrikulturchemischer Sicht. Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, 1985: 1-260. (in Germany)
[5] KÖRSCHENS M& SCHULZ E . Die organische Bodensubstanz- Dynamik Reproduktion Ökonomisch und ökologisch begründete Richtwerte. UFZ-Bericht, 1999(13):1-46. (in Germany)
[6] HLUG. Untersuchung des Einflusses des Klimawandels auf die CO2- Freisetzung aus Böden ausgewählter hessischer Dauerbeobachtungsflächen . Wiesbaden,Germany: Hessisches Landesamt für Umwelt und Geologie, 2008: 1-52. (in Germany)
[7] HERBST M . Pilotstudie zur Kohlenstoffmodellierung der Dauerversuchsfläche Bonn Dikopshof Modellierung der landwirtschaftlich genutzten Dauerversuchsflächen in NRW . Jülich, Germany: Institut für Bio- und Geowissenschaften, 2010: 1-13. (in Germany)
[8] ANONYM. Klimawandel und Boden Auswirkungen der globalen Erwärmung auf den Boden als Pflanzenstandort. Düsseldorf, Germany: Ministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Landwirtschaft, Natur- und Verbraucherschutz des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, 2011: 1-27. (in Germany)
[9] KOLBE H, ZIMMER J . Leitfaden zur Humusversorgung. Saechsisches Landesamt fuer Umwelt. Dresden,Germany: Landwirtschaft und Geologie, 2015: 1-61. (in Germany)
[10] KOLBE H, SCHUSTER M . Bodenfruchtbarkeit im Öko-Betrieb. Untersuchungsmethoden. Dresden, Germany: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt,Landwirtschaft und Geologie, 2011: 1-134. (in Germany)
[11] KOLBE H . Verfahren zur Abschätzung von Humusreproduktion und N-Umsatz im ökologischen und konventionellen Ackerbau in Humusreproduktion und N-Umsatz Schriftenreihe des Landesamtes für Umwelt,. Landwirtschaft und Geologie, 2013(1):1-119. (in Germany)
[12] PAUL E A, CLARK F E. Soil microbiology and biochemistry. San Diego,USA:Academic Press, 1996: 34-83.
[13] SIMPSON A J . Molecular structure and associations of humic substances in the terrestrial environment. Naturwissenschaften, 2002,89:84-88.
[14] VERSTRAETE W, TOP E M . Soil clean-up: lessons to remember. Internat. Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 1999,43:147-153.
[15] LTZ. Untersuchungsergebnisse von Praxisflächen aus den Jahren 1993-2006. Karlsruhe, Germany: Landwirtschaftliches Technologiezentrum Augustenberg Baden-Württemberg, 2015: 1-93. (in Germany)
[16] ANONYM. Bundes-Bodenschutzgesetz. Germany: Bundesministeriums der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. 2017: 1-11. (in Germany)
[17] ANONYM. Verordnung über die Anwendung von Düngemitteln, Bodenhilfsstoffen, Kultursubstraten und Pflanzenhilfsmitteln nach den Grundsätzen der guten fachlichen Praxis beim Düngen. Germany: Bundesministeriums der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz, 2017: 1-46. (in Germany)
[18] ANONYM. Düngegesetz. Germany: Bundesministeriums der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz, 2017: 1-11. (in Germany)
[19] ANONYM. Verordnung (EG) Nr. 834/2007 des Rates über die ökologische/ biologische Produktion und Kennzeichnung von ökologischen/ biologischen Erzeugnissen und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2092/91 . Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2007: 1-23. (in Germany)
[20] KOLBE H . Zusammenfuehrende Untersuchungen zur Genauigkeit und Anwendung von Methoden der Humusbilanzierung im konventionellen und ökologischen Landbau Bilanzierungsmethoden und Versorgungsniveau für Humus. Schriftenreihe des Sächsischen Landesamtes für Umwelt, 2012(19):1-85. (in Germany)
[21] KOLBE H . Anwendungsbeispiele zur standortangepassten Humusbilanzierung im konventionellen Ackerbau. Informationen für Praxis, Beratung und Schulung. Dresden, Germany: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt,Landwirtschaft und Geologie, 2013: 1-47. (in Germany)
[22] KOLBE H . Anwendungsbeispiele zur standortangepassten Humusbilanzierung im ökologischen Landbau. Informationen fuer Praxis, Beratung und Schulung. Dresden, Germany: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt,Landwirtschaft und Geologie, 2013: 1-101. (in Germany)
[23] ANONYM. Bodenkundliche Kartierunganleitung. Hannover,Germany: Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe in Zusammenarbeit mit den Staatlichen Geologischen Diensten, 2005: 1-25. (in Germany)
[24] 全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤图有机质含量分布图(1:400万比例尺). 西安: 西安地图出版社, 1996.
National Soil Survey Office. Map of China Soil Organic Matter Content (Scale 1: 4 000 000). Xi'an: Xi'an Map Publishing House, 1996. (in Chinese)
[25] DUEWEL O, UTERMANN J. Humusversorgung der (Ober-) Böden in Deutschland - Status Quo. In: Huettl R: Zum Stand der Humusversorgung von Böden in Deutschland Cottbuser Schriften zur Ökosystemgenese und Landschaftsentwicklung Band 7. Cottbus, Germany: Brandenburgische Technische Universität, 2008: 129-136. (in Germany)
[26] KOLBE H . Auswirkungen differenzierter Land- und Bodenbewirtschaftung auf den C- und N-Haushalt der Böden unter Berücksichtigung konkreter Szenarien der prognostizierten Klimaänderung im Freistaat Sachen. Schriftenreihe des Landesamtes für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie, 2009 (23):1-143. (in Germany)
[27] LBGR. Auswertung des Fachinformationssystems Bodengeologie des Landes Brandenburg nach den Bodengruppen zur Düngung und den Gehalten an organischem Kohlenstoff bzw der organischen Bodensubstanz (Glühverlust) auf Grundlage der Bodenübersichtskarte 1:3000.000. Cottbus, Germany: Landesamt für Bergbau, Geologie und Rohstoffe des Landes Brandenburg, 2015. (in Germany)
[28] CAPRIEL P . Standorttypische Humusgehalte von Ackerböden in Bayern. Schriftenreihe der Bayerischen Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, 2010(5):1-23. (in Germany)
[29] ROGASIK J . Humusbilanz und Maßnahmen für optimale Humusgehalte. Braunschweig,Germany: Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde FAL, 2005: 1-31. (in Germany)
[30] KOLBE H. Nährstoff- und Humusversorgung. In: Gute fachliche Praxis - Bodenfruchtbarkeit. Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz. AID, 2016(4):50-58. (in Germany)
[31] VDLUFA. Humusbilanzierung-Methode zur Beurteilung und Bemessung der Humusversorgung von Ackerland. Darmstadt, Germany: VDLUFA-Standpunkt, 2004: 1-13. (in Germany)
[32] VDLUFA. Humusbilanzierung-Eine Methode zur Analyse und Bewertung der Humusversorgung von Ackerland. Darmstadt, Germany: VDLUFA-Standpunk, 2014: 1-11. (in Germany)
[33] KOLBE H . Site-adjusted organic matter-balance method for use in arable farming systems. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2010, 173:678-691.
[1] ZHAO ZiJie, SONG Hao, DONG XiaoOu, WAN JianMin. Progress in Transposable Element-Assisted Targeted Insertion of Large DNA Fragments [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1141-1156.
[2] LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[3] WANG JiaMei, XU FengQi, ZHOU Hui, HU XiangDong. The Current Situation, Regional Characteristics and International Experience of Agricultural Socialized Services in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 459-474.
[4] LI YunLi, DIAO DengChao, LIU YaRui, SUN YuChen, MENG XiangYu, WU ChenFang, WANG Yu, WU JianHui, LI ChunLian, ZENG QingDong, HAN DeJun, ZHENG WeiJun. Genome-Wide Association Study of Heat Tolerance at Seedling Stage in A Wheat Natural Population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1663-1683.
[5] ZHANG HaoXin, YU ShengYue, LEI QiuLiang, DU XinZhong, ZHANG Jizong, AN MiaoYing, FAN BingQian, LUO JiaFa, LIU HongBin. Simulating Soil Organic Carbon Dynamic Changes in Dryland and Paddy Field of Northeast China Using RothC Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1564-1578.
[6] LI ShaoXing, SONG WenFeng, WEI ZeYu, ZHOU YuLing, SONG LiXia, REN Ke, MA Qun, WANG LongChang. Effects of Straw and Milk Vetch Mulching on Soil Fertility and Sweet Potato Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1591-1603.
[7] WANG Bin, WU PengHao, LU JianWei, REN Tao, CONG RiHuan, LU ZhiFeng, LI XiaoKun. Water Demand Characteristics of Rice-Oilseed Rape Rotation System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1355-1365.
[8] ZHENG Yu, CHEN Yi, TI JinSong, SHI LongFei, XU XiaoBo, LI YuLin, GUO Rui. Evaluation of Carbon Footprint and Economic Benefit of Different Tobacco Rotation Patterns [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 733-747.
[9] ZHOU GuangFei, MA Liang, MA Lu, ZHANG ShuYu, ZHANG HuiMin, SONG XuDong, ZHANG ZhenLiang, LU HuHua, HAO DeRong, MAO YuXiang, XUE Lin, CHEN GuoQing. Genome-Wide Association Study of Husk Traits in Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 431-442.
[10] ZHANG FangFang, SONG QiLong, GAO Na, BAI Ju, LI Yang, YUE ShanChao, LI ShiQing. Effects of Long-Term Mulching Practices on Maize Yield, Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Fractions and Indexes Related to Carbon and Nitrogen Pool on the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 507-519.
[11] MA HeXiao, GE GuoLong, ZHANG XiangQian, LU ZhanYuan, WANG ManXiu, RONG MeiRen, SHI JingJing, ZHANG DeJian, SUN XuePing. Effects of Different Crop Rotation Systems on Soil Readily Oxidized Organic Carbon and Carbon Pool Activity Differences [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5201-5215.
[12] WU WenQi, JIAO Yang, XI JiaZhen, WANG XuFeng, GUO BoSen, SHEN YuFang. Effects of Different Organic Materials Combined with Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Fertility and Maize Grain Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4966-4978.
[13] WU ShuYu, HENG YanFang, YU TaiFei, WANG ShiJia, YU SiJia, LI Yuan, HU Zheng, ZHANG Hui, SUN XianJun, LI Liang, JIANG QiYan. Identification of Salt Tolerance in Maize Natural Populations at the Seedling Stage and Analysis of Salt Tolerance-Associated Genes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(20): 4085-4099.
[14] ZHANG SiJia, YANG Jie, ZHAO Shuai, LI LiWei, WANG GuiYan. The Impact of Diversified Crops and Wheat-Maize Rotations on Soil Quality in the North China Plain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 238-251.
[15] YUAN HuiLin, LI YaYing, GU WenJie, XU PeiZhi, LU YuSheng, SUN LiLi, ZHOU ChangMin, LI WanLing, QIU RongLiang. Characterization and Correlation Analysis of Soil Dissolved Organic Matter and Microbial Communities Under Long-Term Application of Fresh and Composted Manure [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 307-325.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!