Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (18): 3733-3743.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.18.006

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of Mixed Salt-Tolerance at Germination Stage and Seedling Stage and the Related Physiological Characteristics of Panicum miliaceum L.

 LIU  Min-Xuan, ZHANG  Zong-Wen, WU  Bin, LU  Ping   

  1. 1.中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081
  • Received:2012-05-02 Online:2012-09-15 Published:2012-06-26

Abstract: 【Objective】 Salt-tolerance and physiological responses of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) were evaluated under a range of NaCl+Na2SO4 concentrations to explore and utilize the germplasm with high salt-tolerance and to provide physiological indicators for identifying salt-tolerance at seedling stage. 【Method】 The growth parameters of 16 genotypes of P. miliaceum L. at germination and seedling stages were measured under various salt stresses, and the genotypes were sorted out using the method of membership function. The physiological characteristics of the genotypes in terms of concentration of proline and Na+/K+ were analyzed.【Result】It was shown that the relative germination value, survival seedling number, shoot length, root length and biomass of above and underground all decreased with the increase of salt concentration, although genotypes differed in the degrees of response to salt stress. Based on the membership function on the means of parameters at germination and seedling stages for each level of salt stress, the 16 genotypes were finally ranked with Zhongwei Dahuangmi, Ningmi No4 and 64-4129 as the most tolerant genotypes, and Bameng 573 Huangmizi, Yimen Yidianzong and Wahui Ruanmi as the least tolerant ones among all tested materials. Proline content in shoot increased in response to increased salt stress, with Zhongwei Dahuangmi and Ningmi No.4 had significantly higher proline content, while lower relative Na+/K+ than the others when salt concentrations at 160 and 200 mmol.L-1 (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】Remarkable variations in salt tolerance were detected among the 16 genotypes of P. miliaceum L., which have provided a basis for the utilization of salt tolerant broomcorn millet genetic resources.

Key words: Panicum miliaceum L., mixed salt stress, salinity tolerance, physiological response

[1]Golldack D, Lüking I, Yang O. Plant tolerance to drought and salinity: Stress regulating transcription factors and their functional significance in the cellular transcriptional network. Plant Cell Report, 2011, 30:1383-1391.

[2]Jiang Y, Deyholos M. Comprehensive transcriptional profiling of NaCl-stressed Arabidopsis roots reveals novel classes of responsive genes. BMC Plant Biology, 2006, 6(1):25.

[3]翁跃进. 作物耐盐品种及其栽培技术. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2003.

Weng Y J. Salt Tolerance Cultivar and Cultivated Technique of Crop. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003. (in Chinese)

[4]Kawanabe S, Zhu T C. Degeneration and conservation of Aneurolepidium chinense grassland in North China. Journal of Japanese Society of Grassland Science, 1991, 37:91-99.

[5]Crawford G W. Agricultural origins in North China pushed back to the Pleistocene–Holocene boundary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106:7271-7272.

[6]Lu H Y, Zhang J P, Liu K B, Wu N Q, Li Y M, Zhou K S, Ye M L, Zhang T Y, Zhang H J, Yang X Y, Shen L C, Xu D K, Li Q. Earliest domestication of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) in East Asia extended to 10,000 years ago. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106:7367-7372.

[7]Brand J D, Tang C, Rathjen A J. Screening rough-seeded iupins (Lupinus pilosus Murr. and Lupinusatlanticus Glads.) for tolerance to calcareous soils. Plant Soil, 2002, 245:261-275.

[8]Hartung W, Leport L, Ratcliffe R G, Sauter A, Duda R, Neil C. Abscisic acid concentration, root PH and anatomy do not explain growth differences of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lupin(Lupinus angustifolius L.) on acid and alkaline soils. Plant Soil, 2002, 240:191-199.

[9]Yang C W, Zhang M L, Liu J, Shi D C, Wang D L. Effects of buffer capacity on growth, photosynthesis, and solute accumulation of a glycophyte(wheat) and a halophyte(Chloris virgata). Photosynthetica, 2009, 47(1):55-60.

[10]颜 宏, 石德成, 尹尚军, 赵 伟. 盐、碱胁迫对羊草体内N及几种有机代谢产物积累的影响. 东北师大学报:自然科学版, 2000, 32(3): 47-52.

Yan H, Shi D C, Yin S J, Zhao W. Effects of saline-alkaline stress on the contents of nitrogen and several organisms of Aneurolepidium chinense. Journal of Northeast Normal University, 2000, 32(3):47-52. (in Chinese)

[11]Campbell S A, Nishio J N. Iron deficiency studies of sugar beet using an improved sodium bicarbonate buffered hydroponic growth system. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2000, 23(6):741-757.

[12]董玉琛, 郑殿升. 中国作物及其野生近缘植物-粮食作物卷. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2006.

Dong D C, Zheng D S. Crops and Their Wild Relatives in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. (in Chinese)

[13]王 纶, 王星玉, 温琪汾, 武变娥, 曹立萍. 中国黍稷种质资源耐盐性鉴定. 植物遗传资源学报, 2007, 8(4):426-429.

Wang L, Wang X Y, Weng Q F, Wu B E, Cao L P. Identification of salt tolerance in Chinese proso millet germplasm. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2007, 8(4):426-429. (in Chinese)

[14]王星玉, 王 纶, 温琪汾, 师 颖. 山西是黍稷的起源和遗传多样性中心. 植物遗传资源学报, 2009, 10(3):465-470.

Wang X Y, Wang L, Weng Q F, Shi Y. Shanxi province is the center of the origin and genetic diversity of proso millet. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2009, 10(3):465-470. (in Chinese)

[15]Khan A A, Rao S A, McNeilly T. Assessment of salinity tolerance based upon seedling root growth response functions in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica, 2003, 131:81-89.

[16]田伯红, 王素英, 李雅静, 王建广, 张立新, 梁凤芹, 翟玉柱, 刘金荣. 谷子地方品种发芽期和苗期对NaCl胁迫的反应和耐盐品种筛选. 作物学报, 2008, 34(12):2218-2222.

Tian B H, Wang S Y, Li Y J, Wang J G, Zhang L X, Liang F Q, Zhai Y Z, Liu J R. Response to sodium chloride stress at germination and seedling and identification of salinity tolerant genotypes in foxtail millet landraces originated from China. Acta Agromomica Sinica, 2008, 34(12):2218-2222. (in Chinese)

[17]Krishnamurthy L, Serraj R, Rai K N, Hash C T, Dakheel A J. Identification of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum(L.) R. Br.] lines tolerant to soil salinity. Euphytica, 2007, 158:179-188.

[18]Li J M, Liu L, Bai Y L, Zhang P J, Finkers R, Du Y C, Visser R G F, Heusden A W V. Seedling salt tolerance in tomato. Euphytica, 2011, 178:403-414.

[19]王星玉, 王 纶. 黍稷种质资源描述规范与数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.

Wang X Y, Wang L. Descriptors and Data Standard for Broomcorn millet (Panicum Miliaceum L.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. (in Chinese)

[20]陈德明, 俞仁培, 杨劲松. 盐渍条件下小麦抗盐性的隶属函数值法评价. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(3): 368-373.

Chen D M, Yu R P, Yang J S. Evaluation of salt resistance of wheat with subordinate function value method. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(3): 368-373. (in Chinese)

[21]朱广廉, 邓兴旺, 左卫能. 植物体内游离脯氨酸的测定. 植物生理学通讯, 1983 (4): 1-7.

Zhu G L, Deng X W, Zuo W N. Measuration on free proline of   plant body. Plant Physiology Communications, 1983(4): 1-7. (in Chinese)

[22]中国科学院上海植物生理研究所. 现代植物生理学实验指南. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.

Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology, The Chinese Academy of Sciences. Contemporary Plant Physiological Experiment Manual. Beijing: Science Press, 1999. (in Chinese)

[23]Läuchli A, Lüttge U. Salinity: Environment-Plants-Molecules. Boston: Boston Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:21-23.

[24]李 彬, 王志春, 孙志高, 陈 渊, 杨 福. 中国盐碱地资源与可持续利用研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 23(2):152-158.

Li B, Wang Z C, Sun Z G, Chen Y, Yang F. Resources and sustainable resource exploitation of salinized land in China. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2005, 23(2):152-158. (in Chinese)

[25]Tanji K K. Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1990:1-112.

[26]祁栋灵, 张三元, 曹桂兰, 阮仁超, 孙明茂, 张艳蕊, 周庆阳, 韩龙植. 水稻发芽期和幼苗前期耐碱性的鉴定方法研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2006, 7(1):74-80.

Qi D L, Zhang S Y, Cao G L, Ruan R C, Sun M M, Zhang Y R, Zhou Q Y, Han L Z. Studies on screening methods for alkaline tolerance at germination period and early seedling stage in rice. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2006, 7(1) : 74-80. (in Chinese)

[27]曲元刚, 赵可夫. NaCl和Na2CO3对碱蓬胁迫效应的比较. 植物生理与分子生物学报, 2003, 29(5):387-394.

Qu Y G, Zhao K F. Comparison of the stress effects of NaCl and Na2CO3 on Suaeda salsa L. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 2003, 29(5): 387-394. (in Chinese)

[28]苏国兴, 洪法水. 桑品种耐盐性的隶属函数法之评价. 江苏农业科学, 2002, 18 (1) : 42 - 47.

Su G X, Hong F S. Evaluation of salt tolerance for partial mulberry varieties with subordinate function. Jiangsu Journal of Agriculture Science, 2002, 18 (1):42 - 47. (in Chinese)

[29]柴媛媛, 史团省, 谷卫彬. 种子萌发期甜高粱对盐胁迫的响应及其耐盐性综合评价分析. 种子, 2008, 27(2):43-46.

Chai Y Y, Shi T S, Gu W B. Response to salt stresses and salt resistance evaluation of sweet sorghum during seed germination stage. Seed, 2008, 27(2):43-46. (in Chinese)

[30]Richards R A. Increasing salinity tolerance of grain crops: is it worthwhile? Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, 1993, 50(50): 117-126.

[31]绍桂花, 常汝镇, 陈一舞. 大豆耐盐性研究进展. 大豆科学, 1993, 12 (3) : 244-248.

Shao G H, Chang R Z, Chen Y W. Salt tolerance of soybean. Soybean Science, 1993, 12 (3): 244-248. (in Chinese)

[32]Abel G H, Mackenize A T. Salt tolerance of soybean varieties during germination and later growth. Crop Science, 1964, 4: 157-161.

[33]Parida A K, Das A B. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety, 2005, 60: 324-349.

[34]Jame R A, Munns R, Caemmerer S, Trejo C, Miller C, Condon T. Photosynthetic capacity is related to the cellular and sub cellular partitioning of Na+, K+ and Cl- in salt effected barley and durum wheat. Plant Cell Environment, 2006, 29: 2185-2197.
[1] XiaoFeng LU,GuoDong DU,Jing SHAO,JingRu ZHANG,HaiLong SUN. Physiological Response of Mitochondrial Function of Strawberry Roots to Exogenous Phenolic Acid [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 1029-1042.
[2] SUN Jian,YAN XiaoWen,LE MeiWang,RAO YueLiang,YAN TingXian,YE YanYing,ZHOU HongYing. Physiological Response Mechanism of Drought Stress in Different Drought-Tolerance Genotypes of Sesame During Flowering Period [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1215-1226.
[3] DIAO XianMin. Progresses in Stress Tolerance and Field Cultivation Studies of Orphan Cereals in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 3943-3949.
[4] YUAN YuHao, YANG QingHua, DANG Ke, YANG Pu, GAO JinFeng, GAO XiaoLi, WANG PengKe, LU Ping, LIU MinXuan, FENG BaiLi. Salt-Tolerance Evaluation and Physiological Response of Salt Stress of Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 4066-4078.
[5] 吕Jin-Hui , LI Yan-Feng, WANG Xuan, REN Lei, FENG Yan-Meng, ZHAO Xia-Lu, ZHANG Chun-Lai. Impact of Shading on Growth, Development and Physiological Characteristics of Trollius chinensis Bunge [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(9): 1772-1780.
[6] LI Yan, FU Yan-Dong, MA Yan-Chun, DU Yuan-Peng, DI Heng. Effects of Waterlogging on Characteristics of Growth and Photosynthesis in Different Grape Rootstocks [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(5): 995-1004.
[7] XIAO Liu-Bin, TAN Yong-An, SUN Yang, ZHAO Hong-Xia, WU Guo-Qiang, BAI Li-Xin. Adaptability and Physiological Response to Host Plant Species Switching in Apolygus lucorum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(23): 4941-4949.
[8] SUN Lu, ZHOU Yu-Fei, WANG Che, XIAO Mu-Ji, TAO Ye, XU Wen-Juan, HUANG Rui-Dong. Screening and Identification of Sorghum Cultivars for Salinity Tolerance During Germination [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(9): 1714-1722.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!