生长调节剂对玉米大豆带状间作下夏玉米茎秆特性与产量的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.23.009

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study clarified the physiological basis of the effects of growth regulators on the stem characteristics and yield of summer maize under maize-soybean strip intercropping, with the aim of providing the technical support and theoretical basis for improving the lodging resistance of summer maize and ensuring stable and high yield in the intercropping system. 【Method】 In 2023-2024, using maize variety of Denghai 605, soybean varieties of Heidou 22 and Andou 203 as test materials, under the strip intercropping pattern of 4 rows of maize and 6 rows of soybeans, six treatments were designed (CK, treatment with water; T1, 300 mg·L^-1ethepene+0.03 mg·L^-12, 4-epibrassinolide; T2, 300 mg·L^-1ethepene+0.03 mg·L^-1 aminosterol; T3, 300 mg·L^-1ethylene glycol+0.03 mg·L^-12, 4-epibrassinolide+0.03 mg·L^-1aminosterol; T4, 300 mg·L^-1 ethylene glycol+2 g·L^-1 chlorpyritin+ 0.03 mg·L^-12, 4-epibrassinolide; T5, 300 mg·L^-1ethoxylenol+2 g·L^-1 chlorpyritin+0.03 mg·L^-12, 4-epibrassinolide +0.03 mg·L^-1 aminosterol) at the V7 (7-leaf) stage. The maize plants were sprayed with either water or different combinations of these growth regulators. The effects of various combination treatments on the morphology of intercropped maize plants, lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose content in the third internode from the base, as well as on yield, were investigated. 【Result】 Compared with CK, the application of growth regulators increased the stem diameter, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose content in the maize third internode from the base, while reducing maize plant height and length of the third internode, thus improving the lodging resistance of intercropped maize. In addition, the growth regulators increased the leaf area index (LAI), number of ears per hectare, and ear tip length of maize, while reducing its plant height, ear length, number of kernels per ear, 1000-grain weight, and grain yield in the maize-soybean strip intercropping system. The decrease in yield was primarily due to the reduction in the number of kernels per ear and thousand kernel weight caused by the growth regulators. The T3 and T5 treatments had higher leaf area index, stem diameter, and lignin content in the third internode, with a yield reduction of 0.38%-1.53% (T3) and 1.40%-3.03% (T5), indicating that the combination treatments of ethephon, 2,4-epibrassinolide, and aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid (T3 and T5) were beneficial to maize yield formation in the intercropping system. 【Conclusion】 After the application of growth regulators, the stem diameter and lignin content of intercropped maize in the maize-soybean strip intercropping system increased, resulting in enhanced lodging resistance. Under the experimental conditions, the combination of ethephon (300 mg·L^-1), 2,4-epibrassinolide (0.03 mg·L^-1), and aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid (0.03 mg·L^-1) was found to be the most effective growth regulator formulation for improving the lodging resistance of maize stalks in the maize-soybean strip intercropping system while conducive to the stable yield of intercropping maize.

Key words: maize-soybean strip intercropping, growth regulators, summer maize, stem characteristics, yield

GAO ChunHua, ZHAO HaiJun, ZHAO FengTao, KONG WeiLin, JU FeiYan, LI ZongXin, SHI DeYang, LIU Ping. Effect of Growth Regulators on the Stem Characteristics and Yield of Summer Maize in Maize-Soybean Strip Intercropping[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4920-4935.

Figures/Tables 12

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 2

Effects of growth regulators on stem diameter and internode length of the third internode of intercropped maize base"

地点 Site	年份 Year	处理 Treatment	茎粗Stem diameter			节间长Internode length
地点 Site	年份 Year	处理 Treatment	抽雄期 Tasseling stage	乳熟期 Milking stage	成熟期 Maturity stage	抽雄期 Tasseling stage	乳熟期 Milking stage	成熟期 Maturity stage
莱州 Laizhou	2023	CK	19.09±0.02c	19.80±0.14e	17.54±0.27d	12.27±0.15a	13.90±0.53a	14.60±0.10a
		T1	20.37±0.68b	21.62±0.45bc	18.83±0.39c	9.30±0.20c	10.30±0.26d	11.33±0.15c
		T2	20.84±0.21b	21.12±0.06c	18.93±0.14bc	9.33±0.15c	11.20±0.26c	11.50±0.10c
		T3	22.04±0.78a	22.87±0.24a	20.93±0.41a	10.17±0.15b	12.13±0.15b	12.27±0.06b
		T4	20.87±0.86b	20.60±0.56d	19.04±0.03bc	8.07±0.12d	9.17±0.21e	9.83±0.15e
		T5	21.14±0.20a	21.98±0.34b	19.45±0.42b	9.43±0.15c	10.20±0.26d	10.77±0.15d
	2024	CK	19.08±0.59e	19.79±0.14d	17.41±0.16e	13.03±0.06a	13.80±0.10a	14.07±0.15a
		T1	20.07±0.08d	20.42±0.05c	18.42±0.09d	10.17±0.29d	11.17±0.15c	11.77±0.15c
		T2	21.44±0.37b	21.52±0.18b	19.93±0.07b	10.60±0.10c	11.37±0.15c	11.87±0.15c
		T3	22.37±0.39a	22.70±0.32a	20.75±0.06a	11.73±0.12b	12.07±0.21b	12.70±0.10b
		T4	19.38±0.24e	19.76±0.17e	17.55±0.13e	9.33±0.15e	9.77±0.21e	10.10±0.20e
		T6	20.80±0.15c	21.51±0.49c	18.99±0.28c	10.30±0.10d	10.73±0.15d	11.13±0.15d
桓台 Huantai	2024	CK	18.83±0.51d	19.81±0.27c	16.78±0.20e	13.20±0.20a	14.17±0.25a	14.70±0.44a
		T1	20.98±0.73b	21.24±0.32b	18.96±0.74c	10.60±0.10d	11.07±0.15d	11.63±0.21c
		T2	21.81±0.33ab	21.84±0.74ab	19.70±0.34b	10.10±0.10e	10.60±0.10e	11.13±0.21d
		T3	22.55±0.47a	22.83±1.14a	20.43±0.26a	11.80±0.10b	12.30±0.10b	12.83±0.06b
		T4	19.91±0.76c	20.96±1.16bc	17.84±0.22d	9.73±0.15f	9.97±0.12f	10.20±0.10e
		T6	21.14±0.20b	21.98±0.34ab	19.13±0.13bc	11.40±0.20c	11.40±0.20c	11.73±0.15c
F值 F value	年份 Year		0.47	2.64	0.73	73.58**	4.23	2.11
	处理 Treatment		8.55*	14.02**	8.28*	73.98**	59.75**	62.75**
	年份×处理 Year×Treatment		3.66*	5.33**	15.76**	6.12**	3.84*	10.7**
	地点 Site		4.96	7.39*	0.04	1.68	0.25	0.23
	处理 Treatment		44.78**	23.36**	35.88**	23.37*	32.69**	32.33**
	地点×处理 Site×Treatment		1.08	0.92	3.49*	17.92**	13.35**	10.13**

Table 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Table 3

Table 4

References 44

[4]	YANG F, WANG X C, LIAO D P, LU F Z, GAO R C, LIU W G, YONG T W, WU X L, DU J B, LIU J, YANG W Y. Yield response to different planting geometries in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 2015, 107(1): 296-304. doi: 10.2134/agronj14.0263
[5]	DU J B, HAN T F, GAI J Y, YONG T W, SUN X, WANG X C, YANG F, LIU J, SHU K, LIU W G, YANG W Y. Maize-soybean strip intercropping: Achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(4): 747-754. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61789-1
[6]	BERDJOUR A, DUGJE I Y, DZOMEKU I K, RAHMAN N A. Maize-soybean intercropping effect on yield productivity, weed control and diversity in northern Ghana. Weed Biology and Management, 2020, 20(2): 69-81. doi: 10.1111/wbm.v20.2
[7]	严旖旎, 单海勇, 刘旭杰, 张晋, 石晓旭, 石吕, 刘建, 杨美英. 生长调节剂对大豆-玉米间作模式中玉米产量和抗倒性的影响. 核农学报, 2024, 38(9): 1805-1813. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2024.09.1805
	YAN Y N, SHAN H Y, LIU X J, ZHANG J, SHI X X, SHI L, LIU J, YANG M Y. Effect of growth regulators on maize yield and lodging resistance in soybean-maize intercropping system. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 38(9): 1805-1813. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2024.09.1805
[8]	张庆娜, 邵广忠, 孙殷会, 程娟, 傅迎军, 孟祥海, 胡颖慧, 王佰成. 种植密度对玉米茎秆抗倒伏性能及产量的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2023(7): 1-6.
	ZHANG Q N, SHAO G Z, SUN Y H, CHENG J, FU Y J, MENG X H, HU Y H, WANG B C. Effects of planting density on lodging resistance and yield of maize. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023(7): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[9]	QI B Q, HU J, ZHU L B, DUAN Y Y, ZHANG W F, GOU L. Response of maize stalk to plant density on cellulose accumulation by modulating enzymes activities. Field Crops Research, 2023, 304: 109152. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109152
[10]	金容, 李钟, 李仕伟, 夏清清, 杨云, 王鹏, 姚平, 蒲全波, 郑祖平. 种植密度对四川丘陵区玉米抗倒粒收的影响. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(18): 1-10. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0541
	JIN R, LI Z, LI S W, XIA Q Q, YANG Y, WANG P, YAO P, PU Q B, ZHENG Z P. Effect of planting density on anti-lodging mechanical grain harvesting of maize in Sichuan hilly areas. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(18): 1-10. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0541
[11]	JIANG L, ZHANG J Z, CHEN D. Relationship between yield and lodging traits of maize under different planting densities. Agronomy Journal, 2022, 114(4): 2140-2146. doi: 10.1002/agj2.v114.4
[12]	冯尚宗, 王世伟, 彭美祥, 刘宁, 赵桂涛. 不同种植密度对夏玉米产量、叶面积指数和干物质积累的影响. 江西农业学报, 2015, 27(3): 1-5, 22.
	FENG S Z, WANG S W, PENG M X, LIU N, ZHAO G T. Effects of different planting densities on grain yield, LAI and dry matter accumulation of summer maize. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2015, 27(3): 1-5, 22. (in Chinese)
[13]	黄海. 群体密度对玉米茎秆及根系抗倒伏特性的影响[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2013.
	HUANG H. Effects of population density on lodging-resistance characteristic of stalk and root in maize. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[14]	张子学, 崔保田, 牛峰, 李文阳. 密度、行距配置对夏玉米部分农艺性状及产量的影响. 安徽科技学院学报, 2016, 30(5): 8-11.
	ZHANG Z X, CUI B T, NIU F, LI W Y. Effects of density, row spacing on some agronomic traits and yield of summer maize. Journal of Anhui Science and Technology University, 2016, 30(5): 8-11. (in Chinese)
[15]	韩文斌, 吴海英, 于晓波, 梁建秋, 杨鹏, 张明荣. 玉米套作大豆高产高效栽培技术. 大豆科技, 2015(2): 56-57.
	HAN W B, WU H Y, YU X B, LIANG J Q, YANG P, ZHANG M R. High yield and high efficiency cultivation technology of corn intercropping soybean. Soybean Science & Technology, 2015(2): 56-57. (in Chinese)
[16]	孙晓楠. 大豆—玉米垄作间作对间作系统生理生态及后茬小麦赤霉病的影响[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2018.
	SUN X N. Effects of soybean and maize ridge intercropping on Physiology and Ecology of intercropping system and Wheat scab[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[17]	耿文杰, 李宾, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 种植密度和喷施乙烯利对夏玉米木质素代谢和抗倒伏性能的调控. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(2): 307-319. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.02.006.
	GENG W J, LI B, REN B Z, ZHAO B, LIU P, ZHANG J W. Regulation mechanism of planting density and spraying ethephon on lignin metabolism and lodging resistance of summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 307-319. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.02.006. (in Chinese)
[18]	樊海潮, 顾万荣, 杨德光, 尉菊萍, 朴琳, 张倩, 张立国, 杨秀红, 魏湜. 化控剂对东北春玉米茎秆理化特性及抗倒伏的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 909-919. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00909
	FAN H C, GU W R, YANG D G, YU J P, PIAO L, ZHANG Q, ZHANG L G, YANG X H, WEI S. Effect of chemical regulators on physical and chemical properties and lodging resistance of spring maize stem in Northeast China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(6): 909-919. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00909
[19]	BOERJAN W, RALPH J, BAUCHER M. Lignin biosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2003, 54: 519-546. pmid: 14503002
[20]	GONG L S, QU S J, HUANG G M, GUO Y L, ZHANG M C, LI Z H, ZHOU Y Y, DUAN L S. Improving maize grain yield by formulating plant growth regulator strategies in North China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(2): 622-632. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63453-0
[21]	AHMAD I, KAMRAN M, ALI S, BILEGJARGAL B, CAI T, AHMAD S, MENG X P, SU W N, LIU T N, HAN Q F. Uniconazole application strategies to improve lignin biosynthesis, lodging resistance and production of maize in semiarid regions. Field Crops Research, 2018, 222: 66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.015
[22]	GENG W J, SUN Z C, REN B Z, REN H, ZHAO B, LIU P, ZHANG J W. Spraying ethephon effectively increased canopy light transmittance of densely planted summer maize, thus achieving synergistic improvement in stalk lodging resistance and grain yield. Plants, 2022, 11(17): 2219. doi: 10.3390/plants11172219
[23]	GAO Z, LIANG X G, ZHANG L, LIN S, ZHAO X, ZHOU L L, SHEN S, ZHOU S L. Spraying exogenous 6-benzyladenine and brassinolide at tasseling increases maize yield by enhancing source and sink capacity. Field Crops Research, 2017, 211: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.027
[24]	WANG L F, YAN Y N, LU W P, LU D L. Application of exogenous phytohormones at silking stage improve grain quality under post- silking drought stress in waxy maize. Plants, 2021, 10(1): 48. doi: 10.3390/plants10010048
[25]	KAMRAN M, CUI W W, AHMAD I, MENG X P, ZHANG X D, SU W N, CHEN J Z, AHMAD S, FAHAD S, HAN Q F, LIU T N. Effect of paclobutrazol, a potential growth regulator on stalk mechanical strength, lignin accumulation and its relation with lodging resistance of maize. Plant Growth Regulation, 2018, 84(2): 317-332. doi: 10.1007/s10725-017-0342-8
[3]	LIU Y, HOU T R, GUO X P, LIU J G, BAI X H, DONG G H, DONG S T, KONG X M, JIA C L, WU M Q, ZHANG J W. Analysis of development status and countermeasures of corn industry in Shandong Province. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 19(2): 24-30. (in Chinese)
	刘洋, 侯廷荣, 郭新平, 柳京国, 白星焕, 董国豪, 董树亭, 孔晓民, 贾春兰, 吴明泉, 张吉旺. 山东省玉米产业发展现状与对策分析. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 19(2): 24-30.
[2]	ZHAI T, WU L. Study on development situation and revitalization strategy of soybean industry in China from an open perspective. Soybean Science, 2020, 39(3): 472-478. (in Chinese)
	翟涛, 吴玲. 开放视角下中国大豆产业发展态势与振兴策略研究. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(3): 472-478.
[1]	WANG Y, LI G Q, YU W, FENG Y, ZHONG X, LIU R, XU S W. Present situation and prospect of soybean production in China. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 59(21): 201-207. (in Chinese)
	王禹, 李干琼, 喻闻, 冯瑶, 钟鑫, 刘然, 许世卫. 中国大豆生产现状与前景展望. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(21): 201-207.
[26]	VAN SOEST P J, ROBERTSON J B, LEWIS B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10): 3583-3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 pmid: 1660498
[27]	任佰朝, 张吉旺, 董树亭, 赵斌, 刘鹏. 生育前期淹水对夏玉米冠层结构和光合特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11): 2093-2103. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.015.
	REN B Z, ZHANG J W, DONG S T, ZHAO B, LIU P. Effect of waterlogging at early period on canopy structure and photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 2093-2103. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.015. (in Chinese)
[28]	徐田军, 吕天放, 陈传永, 刘月娥, 张译天, 刘秀芝, 赵久然, 王荣焕. 种植密度和植物生长调节剂对玉米茎秆性状的影响及调控. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(4): 629-638. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.04.005.
	XU T J, LÜ T F, CHEN C Y, LIU Y E, ZHANG Y T, LIU X Z, ZHAO J R, WANG R H. Effects of plant density and plant growth regulator on stalk traits of maize and their regulation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 629-638. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.04.005. (in Chinese)
[29]	XIE S P, HUANG G M, LIU Y R, GUO Y L, PENG C X, LI Z H, ZHOU Y Y, DUAN L S. Sensitivity of maize genotypes to ethephon across different climatic zones. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2023, 215: 105487. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105487
[30]	张佳琪, 王明杰, 谢世兴, 武敏桦, 卢海博, 赵海超, 黄智鸿. 化控剂玉黄金对春玉米抗倒伏性状及产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(9): 132-135, 163.
	ZHANG J Q, WANG M J, XIE S X, WU M H, LU H B, ZHAO H C, HUANG Z H. Effect of chemical regulator of Yuhuangjin on lodging resistance and yield of spring maize. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(9): 132-135, 163. (in Chinese)
[31]	王明杰, 张佳琪, 武敏桦, 俞新华, 张凯旋, 卢海博, 赵海超, 黄智鸿. 30%胺鲜酯·乙烯利水剂(玉黄金)对密植春玉米茎折强度及生理特性的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(20): 101-107.
	WANG M J, ZHANG J Q, WU M H, YU X H, ZHANG K X, LU H B, ZHAO H C, HUANG Z H. Effects of 30% aminoacyl Easter and ethylene water agent(Yuhuangjin)on stem fold strength and physiological characteristics of densely planted spring maize. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(20): 101-107. (in Chinese)
[32]	田再民, 黄智鸿, 赵海超, 卢海博, 陈宗政, 陈建新, 史宝林, 魏东. 玉黄金化控对不同种植密度下玉米抗倒伏性和产量构成因素的影响. 河北农业科学, 2019, 23(5): 51-55, 82.
	TIAN Z M, HUANG Z H, ZHAO H C, LU H B, CHEN Z Z, CHEN J X, SHI B L, WEI D. Effects of chemical control with 30% diethyl aminoethyl Hexanoate·Ethephon AS on lodging resistance and yield components of maize under different planting densities. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 23(5): 51-55, 82. (in Chinese)
[33]	郑云霄, 刘文斯, 赵永锋, 贾晓艳, 祝丽英, 黄亚群, 陈景堂, 郭晋杰. 玉米种质资源的抗倒伏性评价及鉴定指标筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(6): 1588-1596. doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20190418001
	ZHENG Y X, LIU W S, ZHAO Y F, JIA X Y, ZHU L Y, HUANG Y Q, CHEN J T, GUO J J. Evaluation of lodging resistance and selection of identification indexes of maize germplasm resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(6): 1588-1596. (in Chinese)
[34]	刘志铭, 盖旭东, 李宝玉, 兰天娇, 孙宝龙, 吕艳杰. 化控对高密度春玉米抗倒伏能力及产量的影响. 东北农业科学, 2019, 44(6): 1-5.
	LIU Z M, GAI X D, LI B Y, LAN T J, SUN B L, LÜ Y J. Effect of chemical regulators on lodging resistance and yield of spring maize under high density conditions. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 44(6):1-5. (in Chinese)
[35]	郑迎霞, 陈杜, 魏鹏程, 卢平, 杨锦越, 罗上轲, 叶开梅, 宋碧. 种植密度对贵州春玉米茎秆抗倒伏性能及籽粒产量的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 738-751. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03044
	ZHENG Y X, CHEN D, WEI P C, LU P, YANG J Y, LUO S K, YE K M, SONG B. Effects of planting density on lodging resistance and grain yield of spring maize stalks in Guizhou Province. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 738-751. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.03044
[36]	徐宇, 孔祥清, 付迪, 白薇. 化控剂密高对玉米抗倒伏性的影响. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2015, 27(6): 10-14.
	XU Y, KONG X Q, FU D, BAI W. Effects of chemical regulator, migao on resistance to lodging. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2015, 27(6): 10-14. (in Chinese)
[37]	MANGA-ROBLES A, SANTIAGO R, MALVAR R A, MORENO- GONZÁLEZ V, FORNALÉ S, LÓPEZ I, CENTENO M L, ACEBES J L, ÁLVAREZ J M, CAPARROS-RUIZ D, ENCINA A, GARCÍA- ANGULO P. Elucidating compositional factors of maize cell walls contributing to stalk strength and lodging resistance. Plant Science, 2021, 307: 110882. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110882
[38]	佘恒志, 聂姣, 李英双, 刘星贝, 胡丹, 马珊, 次仁卓嘎, 汪灿, 吴东倩, 阮仁武, 易泽林. 不同抗倒伏能力甜荞品种茎秆木质素及其单体合成特征. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(7): 1202-1209. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.07.003.
	SHE H Z, NIE J, LI Y S, LIU X B, HU D, MA S, CI R, WANG C, WU D Q, RUAN R W, YI Z L. Lignin and lignin monomer synthetic characteristics of culm in common buckwheat with different lodging resistance capabilities. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(7): 1202-1209. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.07.003. (in Chinese)
[39]	侯佳敏, 罗宁, 王溯, 孟庆锋, 王璞. 增密对我国玉米产量-叶面积指数-光合速率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12): 2538-2546. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.005.
	HOU J M, LUO N, WANG S, MENG Q F, WANG P. Effects of increasing planting density on grain yield, leaf area index and photosynthetic rate of maize in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2538-2546. doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.005. (in Chinese)
[40]	张明达, 张国强, 王克如, 谢瑞芝, 侯鹏, 明博, 薛军, 李少昆. 种植密度和灌溉量对西辽河平原春玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响. 玉米科学, 2023, 31(1): 116-125.
	ZHANG M D, ZHANG G Q, WANG K R, XIE R Z, HOU P, MING B, XUE J, LI S K. Effects of planting density and irrigation amount on yield and water use efficiency of spring maize in the west Liaohe Plain. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2023, 31(1): 116-125. (in Chinese)
[41]	何海涛, 孙睿, 姜文超, 尚保华, 党建友, 裴雪霞. 玉米种植密度对大豆玉米带状复合种植体系干物质养分积累与转运的影响. 核农学报, 2024, 38(7): 1365-1374. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2024.07.1365
	HE H T, SUN R, JIANG W C, SHANG B H, DANG J Y, PEI X X. EEffect of corn planting density on dry matter and accumulation and transport of nutrients in strip compound planting of corn and soybean. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 38(7): 1365-1374. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2024.07.1365
[42]	王海永, 陈小文, 牛晓雪, 苏贺, 申婷婷, 董学会. 乙烯利对夏玉米果穗生长发育影响及生理机制探究. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(5): 64-70.
	WANG H Y, CHEN X W, NIU X X, SU H, SHEN T T, DONG X H. Influence of ethephon on maize cluster growth and development and the physiological mechanism. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014, 22(5): 64-70. (in Chinese)
[43]	李玲, 赵明, 李连禄, 董志强. 乙矮合剂对玉米产量和茎秆质量的影响. 作物杂志, 2007, (5): 51-54.
	LI L, ZHAO M, LI L L, DONG Z Q. Effect of ethephon and chlormequat mixture on yield and stalk quality of maize. Crops, 2007, (5): 51-54. (in Chinese)
[44]	周萍, 崔岭, 王海燕, 钱素菊, 崔亚坤, 陈艳萍, 袁建华. 大豆玉米带状复种模式下种植密度对玉米植株生长和产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(14): 1-5. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-1029
	ZHOU P, CUI L, WANG H Y, QIAN S J, CUI Y K, CHEN Y P, YUAN J H. Effects of planting density on plant growth and yield of maize in maize-soybean strip intercropping system. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(14): 1-5. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-1029

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

试验地点 Experiment site	有机质 Organic matter (g·kg^-1)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg^-1)	碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen (mg·kg^-1)	速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg^-1)	速效钾 Available potassium (g·kg^-1)	年均降水量 Average annual precipitation (mm)	年均气温 Average annual temperature (℃)	年均日照 Average annual sunshine duration (h)
桓台Huantai	14.6	0.99	93.50	46.95	112.34	586.40	13.40	2832.0
莱州Laizhou	10.3	0.89	91.50	50.65	106.15	729.20	11.81	2672.2

地点 Site	年份 Year	处理 Treatment	穗粗 Ear diameter (mm)	轴粗 Kernels per spike (mm)	穗长 Ear length (cm)	秃尖长 Barren ear tip (cm)
莱州 Laizhou	2023	CK	52.21±0.51a	27.04±2.38a	17.85±1.49a	2.06±0.36c
		T1	51.51±0.80a	25.97±1.21ab	16.50±1.80b	2.12±0.15b
		T2	50.73±0.93a	25.86±0.93ab	16.86±1.36b	2.18±0.16b
		T3	51.39±0.95a	25.74±1.14b	15.80±1.65c	2.16±0.21b
		T4	51.39±1.54a	26.07±0.54b	16.15±1.76bc	2.30±0.19a
		T5	51.03±1.28a	25.12±0.51b	16.72±0.94b	2.32±0.13a
	2024	CK	51.19±1.24a	26.80±1.29a	17.49±0.96a	2.02±0.33c
		T1	50.87±2.15a	25.44±0.81a	16.30±1.03b	2.27±0.16b
		T2	51.89±2.22a	25.55±0.74a	15.98±1.06b	2.18±0.17b
		T3	49.30±3.65a	25.74±1.58a	16.31±0.96b	2.09±0.39bc
		T4	51.28±1.96a	26.09±1.17a	15.90±0.50b	2.44±0.21a
		T5	51.09±1.79a	25.69±1.10a	16.48±0.80b	2.15±0.20d
桓台 Huantai	2024	CK	47.20±0.03a	25.68±0.24a	17.53±0.45a	2.20±0.05c
		T1	45.67±0.05c	25.02±0.04b	16.44±0.17b	2.61±0.10a
		T2	45.52±0.08c	24.66±0.16b	16.03±0.15bc	2.26±0.03c
		T3	46.32±0.20b	23.72±0.08c	14.71±0.54d	2.53±0.02b
		T4	44.50±0.11d	23.83±0.53c	15.48±0.07c	2.62±0.14a
		T5	44.39±0.06d	23.29±0.08d	16.33±0.44b	2.46±0.39b
F值 F value	年份 Year		2.27	0.27	0.98	0.02
	处理 Treatment		0.64	7.78	7.36*	4.33
	年份×处理 Year×Treatment		1.64	0.35*	0.63	1.23
	地点 Site		103.26*	1869.18**	1.31	21.92**
	处理 Treatment		1.31	12.78	4.85	5.21*
	地点×处理 Site×Treatment		2.28	0.01	3.01*	6.50**

地点 Site	年份 Year	处理 Treatment	产量 Grain yield (kg·hm^-2)	穗数 Ear number (ears/hm²)	穗粒数 Grain number per ear	千粒重 1000-grain weight (g)
莱州 Laizhou	2023	CK	9227.70±258.33a	53564.37±961.54b	525.07±6.66a	322.40±27.10a
		T1	8744.64±83.92b	54807.97±555.15b	505.93±5.78c	315.64±19.11b
		T2	8630.10±209.60b	56731.05±961.54b	512.47±8.60b	316.14±16.97b
		T3	9192.34±132.61a	60064.43±555.15a	522.13±5.57a	304.82±9.55b
		T4	8434.26±214.29b	54807.97±961.54b	505.33±22.59c	314.66±4.02b
		T5	9094.60±150.65a	62500.31±961.54a	513.00±12.40b	298.18±9.54b
	2024	CK	8677.19±311.97a	63141.34±1110.29b	436.67±32.35a	324.27±6.76a
		T1	8283.18±163.40c	64102.88±555.15b	427.11±65.81b	305.47±6.85b
		T2	8470.70±139.22b	64423.40±961.54b	430.22±55.49b	312.13±5.59b
		T3	8523.47±227.86a	65705.46±555.15a	428.67±49.94b	316.37±4.39b
		T4	8206.61±158.53c	62179.80±555.15c	423.78±42.99b	313.57±4.99b
		T5	8504.49±45.61a	66346.49±961.54a	396.44±116.22c	312.13±4.99b
桓台 Huantai	2024	CK	8746.92±159.26a	63461.86±555.15b	448.87±4.36a	320.33±0.23a
		T1	8100.28±133.75b	63782.37±1468.78b	428.93±0.74c	312.23±1.24b
		T2	8533.38±143.75a	63461.86±961.54b	43033±3.74c	309.13±0.64b
		T3	8612.70±117.24a	65064.43±1110.30a	440.20±2.29b	299.17±5.87b
		T4	7992.54±166.37b	63461.86±1665.44b	423.80±2.19c	297.57±1.59b
		T5	8481.74±98.67a	65384.94±0a	439.47±4.09b	304.90±3.92b
F值 F value	年份 Year		27.85*	65.52**	249.94**	1.00
	处理 Treatment		5.54*	5.10*	1.71	22928.65**
	年份×处理 Year×Treatment		1.90	9.15**	3.50*	0.00
	地点 Site		0.36	0.34	4.06	4.27
	处理 Treatment		12.16*	7.32*	1.92	0.87
	地点×处理 Site×Treatment		1.01	1.07	3.00*	7.00**

Effect of Growth Regulators on the Stem Characteristics and Yield of Summer Maize in Maize-Soybean Strip Intercropping

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 44

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2^# and Changbai7^# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	CUI JieHao, ZHANG Meng, WANG Qin, YU JiaYan, LIN Kun, LI ShangZe, LAN Heng, GENG YanQiu, ZHANG Qiang, GUO LiYing, SHAO XiWen. Evaluation of Lodging Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Japonica Rice Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1420-1438.
[3]	WANG YaFei, YAN Peng, XUE JinTao, DONG XueRui, MENG FanQi, GUO LiNa, LUO Yi, ZHANG Juan, DONG ZhiQiang, LU Lin. Effects of Ethephon-Glycine Betaine-Salicylic Acid Mixture on Root System Architecture, Physiological Function and Yield of Maize Under Heat Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1439-1455.
[4]	WANG YuPing, FU Zhi, SUN JiaYing, MU XiaoMeng, LIU HuiLin, GUO JinYun, SONG WenJing, HOU LeiPing, ZHAO HaiLiang. Evaluation of the Mitigating Effect and Application Efficacy of Melatonin Applied at the Seedling Stage on Short-Term Chilling Stress in Tomato Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[5]	WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[6]	ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[7]	HE JiHang, ZHANG Qing, LÜ XiangYue, XUE JiQuan, XU ShuTu, LIU JianChao. Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Stay-Green Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[8]	GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[9]	HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[10]	YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[11]	YANG Rui, CHEN JingDong, HUANG Ying, XIE LingLi, ZHANG XueKun, ZHOU DengWen, LIU QingYun, XU JinSong, XU BenBo. Genetic Improvement and Configuration Analysis of High-Yield Rapeseed Lines in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 250-264.
[12]	CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[13]	CAI TingYang, ZHU YuPeng, LI RuiDong, WU ZongSheng, XU YiFan, SONG WenWen, XU CaiLong, WU CunXiang. Effects of Leaf-Cutting at Seedling Stage on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Pod Distribution and Yield Formation in Soybean in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.
[14]	ZHANG ZhiYong, TAN ShiChao, XIONG ShuPing, MA XinMing, WEI YiHao, WANG XiaoChun. Effects of Annual Water and Nitrogen Optimization on Yield and Nitrogen Migration of Wheat-Maize Rotation System in Irrigation Area of Northern Henan [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 336-353.
[15]	LÜ XuDong, SUN ShiYuan, LI YaNan, LIU YuLong, WANG YanQun, FU Xin, ZHANG JiaYing, NING Peng, PENG ZhengPing. Effects of Intelligent Mechanized Layered Fertilization on Root-Soil Nutrient Distribution and Yield in Wheat Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 129-146.