Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 2384-2397.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.12.010

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Long-Term Intercropping of Maize with Hairy Vetch Root Returning to Field on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Under Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction

LU BingLin(),CHE ZongXian,ZHANG JiuDong,BAO XingGuo,WU KeSheng,YANG RuiJu   

  1. Institute of Soil, Fertilizer and Water Saving Agricultural, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Arable Land Conservation and Agriculture Environment (Gansu), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Lanzhou 730070
  • Received:2021-04-22 Accepted:2021-06-11 Online:2022-06-16 Published:2022-06-23

Abstract:

【Objective】Effects of long-term intercropping hairy vetch and its stubble returning on maize yield and nitrogen fertilizer contribution rate under nitrogen fertilizer reduction were studied, in order to provide a scientific basis for nitrogen fertilizer substitution and nitrogen resource efficient management in maize/hairy vetch intercropping system.【Method】The field experiment was carried out from 2014 to 2019 at scientific observing and experimental station of arable land conservation and agriculture environment of Gansu Province, Ministry of Agriculture of Rural Affairs. The monocropping maize treatment was set under the levels of no fertilization and conventional nitrogen fertilization, the intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch were set under 90%, 80%, 70%, 60% and 0% of conventional nitrogen application levels, and there were 7 treatments with 3 replicates in a field experiment by using a randomized block design. The changes of crop yield, economic benefits, partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, nitrogen agronomic efficiency and nitrogen fertilizer contribution rate were studied in long-term intercropping of maize with hairy vetch under different nitrogen fertilizer reductions.【Result】The long-term intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch and hairy vetch stubble returning had the obvious advantage for increasing maize yield, the yield increase advantage increased with the lengthening of intercropping years. Compared with conventional nitrogen fertilization, the hay yield of hairy vetch could be increased by 2 273.2 kg·hm-2 under the condition of ensuring stable maize grain yield, the total profit was 29 686 yuan/hm2 and increased by 0.9%, and the partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen agronomic efficiency were significantly increased by 20.7% and 14.7%, respectively, in the long-term intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch and hairy vetch stubble returning under the condition of reduced 20% nitrogen fertilizer. Compared with conventional nitrogen fertilization, although the maize grain yield was significantly reduced by 7.7%, the hay yield of hairy vetch could be increased by 2 319.34 kg·hm-2, and the total profit was 28 652 yuan/hm2, which was equivalent to that of conventional nitrogen fertilization, while the partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen agronomic efficiency were significantly increased by 31.8% and 16.3%, respectively, in the long-term intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch and hairy vetch stubble returning under the condition of reduced 30% nitrogen fertilizer. Compared with conventional nitrogen fertilization, although the hay yield of hairy vetch could be increased by 2 303.09 kg·hm-2, the partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen agronomic efficiency were significantly increased by 48.8% and 23.8%, respectively; however, the maize grain yield was significantly decreased by 10.7%, and the total profit was only 27 929 yuan/hm2, which was significantly lower than that of conventional nitrogen fertilization in the long-term intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch and hairy vetch stubble returning under the condition of reduced 40% nitrogen fertilizer.【Conclusion】If only maize grain yield was considered, 20% chemical nitrogen fertilizer could be substituted, and if total output value of maize and hairy vetch was considered, 30% chemical nitrogen fertilizer could be substituted, in maize/hairy vetch intercropping and hairy vetch stubble returning for 9 years under nitrogen fertilizer reduction in the production process of maize in Hexi oasis irrigation area of Gansu Province.

Key words: maize, hairy vetch, intercropping, hairy vetch root returning to field, fertilizer contribution rate, yield, nitrogen use efficiency, output value

Fig. 1

Maize grain yield in maize with hairy vetch intercropping system under different nitrogen levels CK: No-fertilization; N100: Conventional nitrogen fertilization; N90V: 90% conventional nitrogen fertilization application rate; N80V: 80% conventional nitrogen fertilization application rate; N70V: 70% conventional nitrogen fertilization application rate; N60V: 60% conventional nitrogen fertilization application rate; N0V: No chemical nitrogen fertilizer; V: Hairy vetch root returning to field. The error bars in Fig.1 are standard deviation. The same as below"

Fig. 2

Effects of the intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch on grain yield components of maize under nitrogen fertilizer reductions"

Fig. 3

Effect of the intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch on main stem growth of maize under nitrogen fertilizer reductions"

Fig. 4

Effects of the intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch on panicle tarits of maize under different nitrogen levels"

Fig. 5

Effects of the intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch on hay yield of hairy vetch under nitrogen fertilizer reductions"

Table 1

Economic benefits in maize with hairy vetch intercropping system under nitrogen fertilizer reduction (yuan/hm2)"

处理
Treatment
玉米产值Output value of maize
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2014-2019平均
Average
CK 17990±832c 15593±455 d 15447±445 e 15940±44 c 18702±1266 c 19413±901 d 17181±225 d
N100 29932±557 a 29458±245 a 30456±856 a 29190±610 a 27592±445 a 29925±1071 a 29425±388 a
N90V 30398±1480 a 29877±1321 a 30134±692 a 29197±587 a 27405±1180 a 30613±961 a 29604±863 a
N80V 29371±1015 ab 28257±581 ab 28175±1100 b 28410±898 a 26635±1057 ab 29622±1099 ab 28412±666 ab
N70V 28735±1124 ab 27223±612 bc 27388±1519 b 26320±1739 b 25135±906 b 28093±1518 b 27149±917 bc
N60V 27475±1266 b 26066±992 c 24786±971 c 26028±879 b 25292±618 b 27988±855 b 26273±795 c
N0V 18684±1860 c 14630±1605 d 17567±853 d 15505±1260 c 18002±1670 c 21583±440 c 17662±991 d
处理
Treatment
绿肥产值Output value of green manure
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2014-2019年
平均Average
CK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N90V 2796±133 a 2691±225 a 2360±277 a 2895±400 b 2687±372 b 3200±139 a 2771±95 a
N80V 2617±235 a 2641±388 a 2373±303 a 2881±280 b 2673±260 b 3182±177 a 2728±226 a
N70V 2782±262 a 2727±361 a 2200±349 a 3125±216 ab 2647±220 b 3218±133 a 2783±161 a
N60V 2810±109 a 2683±253 a 2160±423 a 2852±237 b 2900±200 ab 3177±144 a 2764±100 a
N0V 2762±245 a 2825±344 a 2653±129 a 3398±174 a 3153±162 a 3184±180 a 2996±157 a
处理
Treatment
新增成本
Annual increase cost
合计收益 Total profit
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2014-2019平均
Average
CK -2804 20794±832 c 18397±454 c 18251±445 d 18744±44 d 21506±1266 c 22217±901 d 19985±901 d
N100 0 29932±557 ab 29458±245 ab 30456±856 a 29190±610 abc 27592±445 ab 29925±1071 b 29425±1071 ab
N90V 1627 31567±1377 a 30941±1513 a 30867±945 a 30465±349 a 28465±1391 a 32186±1096 a 30748±1096 a
N80V 1453 30535±1139 ab 29445±917 ab 29095±1377 ab 29838±1060 ab 27855±1171 ab 31351±1082 ab 29686±1082 ab
N70V 1280 30237±1174 ab 28670±703 b 28308±1694 b 28165±1841 bc 26502±776 b 30032±1641 b 28652±1641 bc
N60V 1107 29178±1372 b 27643±1245 b 25839±1008 c 27773±939 c 27085±472 ab 30058±874 b 27929±874 c
N0V 67 21379±2014 c 17388±1945 c 20153±912 d 18836±1334 d 21088±1531 c 24701±535 c 20591±535 d

Table 2

Effect of the intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch on partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer under nitrogen fertilizer reduction (kg·kg-1)"

处理
Treatment
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2014-2019平均
Average
N100 38.01±0.71 e 37.41±0.31 e 38.67±1.09 e 37.07±0.94 e 35.04±0.57 e 38.00±1.36 e 37.37±0.49 e
N90V 42.89±2.09 d 42.15±1.86 d 42.52±0.98 d 41.20±0.83 d 38.67±1.67 d 43.19±1.36 d 41.77±1.22 d
N80V 46.62±1.61 c 44.85±0.92 c 44.72±1.75 c 45.10±1.42 c 42.28±1.68 c 47.02±1.74 c 45.10±1.06 c
N70V 52.13±2.04 b 49.38±1.11 b 49.68±2.75 b 47.75±3.16 b 45.60±1.65 b 50.96±2.75 b 49.25±1.66 b
N60V 58.15±2.68 a 55.17±2.10 a 52.46±2.06 a 55.09±1.86 a 53.53±1.31 a 59.23±1.81 a 55.60±1.39 a

Table 3

Effect of the intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch on nitrogen agronomic efficiency under nitrogen fertilizer reduction (kg·kg-1)"

处理
Treatment
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2014-2019平均
Average
N100 15.16±1.38 b 17.61±0.42 c 19.06±0.57 b 16.83±0.72 c 11.29±1.98 a 13.35±1.90 b 15.55±0.31 c
N90V 17.51±0.98 ab 20.15±1.56 b 20.72±0.38 ab 18.70±0.77 b 12.28±2.26 a 15.80±0.17 ab 17.53±0.93 b
N80V 18.06±1.81 ab 20.10±0.75 b 20.20±1.11 ab 19.79±1.37 ab 12.59±3.66 a 16.20±2.61 ab 17.83±0.72 b
N70V 19.49±0.58 a 21.10±0.29 ab 21.66±2.21 a 18.83±3.09 b 11.67±0.97 a 15.75±1.19 ab 18.08±1.29 b
N60V 20.07±2.43 a 22.17±1.34 a 19.77±1.13 b 21.35±1.78 a 13.95±3.55 a 18.15±2.94 a 19.24±0.92 a

Table 4

Effect of the intercropping system of maize with hairy vetch on nitrogen fertilizer contribution rate under nitrogen fertilizer reductions (%)"

处理
Treatment
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2014-2019平均
Average
N100 39.88±3.17 a 47.07±1.28 a 49.28±0.42 a 45.38±1.01 a 32.18±5.28 a 35.06±4.14 a 41.47±0.53 a
N90V 40.81±0.67 a 47.77±1.81 a 48.74±0.40 a 45.39±0.97 a 31.69±5.00 a 36.61±1.01 a 41.84±1.05 a
N80V 38.72±3.09 a 44.82±1.30 b 45.16±0.84 b 43.86±1.65 a 29.59±7.64 ab 34.37±4.59 ab 39.42±0.78 b
N70V 37.40±0.59 ab 42.73±0.39 c 43.53±2.14 b 39.26±3.92 b 25.64±2.67 b 30.88±0.82 b 36.57±1.31 c
N60V 34.48±3.07 b 40.16±1.11 d 37.66±0.74 c 38.71±1.94 b 25.99±6.19 b 30.58±4.33 b 34.60±0.83 d
[1] 朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 259-273. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201
ZHU Z L, JIN J Y. Fertilizer use and food security in China. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(2): 259-273. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0201
[2] 张璐, 黄晶, 高菊生, 曹卫东, 高鹏, 杨志长. 长期绿肥与氮肥减量配施对水稻产量和土壤养分含量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(5): 106-112. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.05.012.
doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.05.012
ZHANG L, HUANG J, GAO J S, CAO W D, GAO P, YANG Z C. Effects of long-term green manure and reducing nitrogen applications on rice yield and soil nutrient content. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(5): 106-112. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.05.012. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.05.012
[3] 曹卫东, 包兴国, 徐昌旭, 聂军, 高亚军, 耿明建. 中国绿肥科研60年回顾与未来展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1450-1461. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17291.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17291
CAO W D, BAO X G, XU C X, NIE J, GAO Y J, GENG M J. Reviews and prospects on science and technology of green manure in China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2017, 23(6): 1450-1461. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17291. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17291
[4] 包兴国, 曹卫东, 杨文玉, 舒秋萍, 李全福, 张久东, 王婷, 胡志桥, 刘生战. 甘肃省绿肥生产历史回顾及发展对策. 甘肃农业科技, 2011(12): 41-44.
BAO X G, CAO W D, YANG W Y, SHU Q P, LI Q F, ZHANG J D, WANG T, HU Z Q, LIU S Z. Production history and development counter measures of green manure in Gansu province. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011(12): 41-44. (in Chinese)
[5] 卢秉林, 包兴国, 张久东, 胡志桥, 杨新强, 曹卫东, 杨文玉, 李全福. 河西绿洲灌区玉米与绿肥间作模式对作物产量和经济效益的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(2): 67-71. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20140214.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20140214
LU B L, BAO X G, ZHANG J D, HU Z Q, YANG X Q, CAO W D, YANG W Y, LI Q F. Effects of different intercropping systems of corn and green manure on crop yield and economic benefit in Hexi oasis irrigation. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2014(2): 67-71. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20140214. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20140214
[6] 王晓锋, 习向银, 刘美玉, 徐盈, 王书凤. 绿肥压青对南方春玉米根际土壤肥力的影响. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(3): 135-138. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.03.055.
doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.03.055
WANG X F, XI X Y, LIU M Y, XU Y, WANG S F. Effects of green manures on rhizosphere soil fertility for spring corn in Southern China. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(3): 135-138. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.03.055. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2013.03.055
[7] 柴宗文, 刘健, 李福, 岳云. 甘肃省玉米产业的发展现状及对策. 甘肃农业科技, 2008(6): 43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1463.2008.06.017.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1463.2008.06.017
CHAI Z W, LIU J, LI F, YUE Y. Development status and countermeasures of corn industry in Gansu province. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2008(6): 43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1463.2008.06.017. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1463.2008.06.017
[8] 陈龙, 孙广正, 姚拓, 柴强, 康文娟, 蒋永梅. 干旱区微生物肥料替代部分化肥对玉米生长及土壤微生物的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(7): 108-113. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.224.
doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.224
CHEN L, SUN G Z, YAO T, CHAI Q, KANG W J, JIANG Y M. Effect of chemical fertilizer partly replaced by microbial fertilizer on maize growth and soil microorganism in arid area. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(7): 108-113. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.224. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2016.224
[9] 吕汉强, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 苏向向, 吕奕彤, 柴强. 干旱绿洲灌区玉米氮素吸收利用对绿肥还田利用方式的响应. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 93-103. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020020.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020020
LÜ H Q, YU A Z, WANG Y L, SU X X, LÜ Y T, CHAI Q. Effect of green manure retention practices on nitrogen absorption and utilization by maize crops in the arid oasis irrigation area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 93-103. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020020. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020020
[10] 杨叶华, 张松, 王帅, 刘正兰, 方林发, 张学良, 刘瑞, 张建伟, 张宇亭, 石孝均. 中国不同区域常见绿肥产量和养分含量特征及替代氮肥潜力评估. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 39-55. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019397.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019397
YANG Y H, ZHANG S, WANG S, LIU Z L, FANG L F, ZHANG X L, LIU R, ZHANG J W, ZHANG Y T, SHI X J. Yield and nutrient concentration in common green manure crops and assessment of potential for nitrogen replacement in different regions of China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 39-55. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019397. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019397
[11] 万水霞, 朱宏斌, 唐杉, 郭熙盛, 王允青. 紫云英与化肥配施对安徽沿江双季稻区土壤生物学特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(2): 387-395. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0213.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0213
WAN S X, ZHU H B, TANG S, GUO X S, WANG Y Q. Effects of Astragalus sinicus manure and fertilizer combined application on biological properties of soil in Anhui double cropping rice areas along the Yangtze River. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015, 21(2): 387-395. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0213. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0213
[12] 杨璐, 曹卫东, 白金顺, 熊静, 高嵩涓, 曾闹华, 志水胜好. 种植翻压二月兰配施化肥对春玉米养分吸收利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4): 799-807. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0404.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0404
YANG L, CAO W D, BAI J S, XIONG J, GAO S J, ZENG N H, SHIMIZU K. Effect of combined application of February Orchid (Orychophragmus violaceus L.)and chemical fertilizer on nutrient uptake and utilization of spring maize. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2013, 19(4): 799-807. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0404. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0404
[13] 张久东, 包兴国, 曹卫东, 车宗贤, 卢秉林, 杨新强, 吴科生. 长期施用绿肥减施化肥对毛叶苕子产草量和土壤肥力的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(6): 66-70. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170610.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170610
ZHANG J D, BAO X G, CAO W D, CHE Z X, LU B L, YANG X Q, WU K S. Effect of long-term application of green manure and reducing fertilizer on Vicia villosa Roth yield and soil fertility. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2017(6): 66-70. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170610. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170610
[14] 郭云周, 尹小怀, 王劲松, 雷素芬, 戴茨华, 温三明, 杜东英, 刘建香. 翻压等量绿肥和化肥减量对红壤旱地烤烟产量产值的影响. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 25(6): 811-816. doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.06.013.
doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.06.013
GUO Y Z, YIN X H, WANG J S, LEI S F, DAI C H, WEN S M, DU D Y, LIU J X. Effects of equal quantity green manure application and different fertilizer rates on yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco in red soil of upland in Yunnan. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2010, 25(6): 811-816. doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.06.013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390x(n).2010.06.013
[15] ANUGROHO F, KITOU M, NAGUMO F, KINJO K, JAYASINGHE G Y. Potential growth of hairy vetch as a winter legume cover crops in subtropical soil conditions. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2010, 56(2): 254-262. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00445.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00445.x.
[16] 常单娜, 曹卫东, 包兴国, 白金顺, 张久东, 卢秉林, 高嵩涓, 曾闹华, 王雪翠, 志水胜好. 西北灌漠土长期不同施肥改变土壤可溶性有机质的化学及光谱学特性. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2016, 36(1): 220-225. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)01-0220-06.
doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)01-0220-06
CHANG D N, CAO W D, BAO X G, BAI J S, ZHANG J D, LU B L, GAO S J, ZENG N H, WANG X C, SHIMIZU K. Long-term different fertilizations changed the chemical and spectrum characteristics of DOM of the irrigation-desert soil in north-western China. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2016, 36(1): 220-225. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)01-0220-06. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)01-0220-06
[17] 赵彩衣, 王媛媛, 董青君, 付利波, 陈华, 陈检锋, 刘满强, 徐莉, 李辉信, 胡锋, 焦加国. 不同水肥处理对苕子和后茬玉米生长及土壤肥力的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4): 161-166, 269. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.023.
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.023
ZHAO C Y, WANG Y Y, DONG Q J, FU L B, CHEN H, CHEN J F, LIU M Q, XU L, LI H X, HU F, JIAO J G. Influence of different irrigation and fertilization treatments on the growth of viciavillosa rothvar and later-cropping maize and soil fertility. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(4): 161-166, 269. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.023. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.023
[18] HAN H R, LEE H H, HONG C O. Effect of incorporation of hairy vetch on nitrous oxide emission from soils cultivated with maize. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 2019, 38(4): 237-244. doi: 10.5338/kjea.2019.38.4.32.
doi: 10.5338/kjea.2019.38.4.32
[19] 白金顺, 曹卫东, 樊媛媛, 高嵩涓. 苏南稻田4种冬绿肥养分特性及对翻压前土壤无机氮的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 413-419.
BAI J S, CAO W D, FAN Y Y, GAO S J. Nutrient characteristics of four kinds of winter green manure and their influences on soil mineral nitrogen before incorporation. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(2): 413-419. (in Chinese)
[20] 刘蕊, 常单娜, 高嵩涓, 周国朋, 韩梅, 张久东, 曹卫东, 孙小凤. 西北小麦与豆科绿肥间作体系箭筈豌豆和毛叶苕子生物固氮效率及氮素转移特性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2184-2194. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20387.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20387
LIU R, CHANG D N, GAO S J, ZHOU G P, HAN M, ZHANG J D, CAO W D, SUN X F. Nitrogen fixation and transfer efficiency of common vetch and hairy vetch in wheat-vetch intercropping system in northwest China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2184-2194. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20387. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20387
[21] NOGUCHI D, HIRATA T, TSUNODA T, UCHINO N, ARAKI H. Effect of reduced fertilizer using hairy vetch production in spring wheat cropping system in Hokkaido. Report of the Hokkaido Branch, the Japanese Society of Breeding and Hokkaido Branch, the Crop Science Society of Japan, 2016, 57: 28-29.
[22] REN J H, ZHANG L Z, DUAN Y, ZHANG J, EVERS J B, ZHANG Y, SU Z C, VAN DER WERF W . Intercropping potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) with hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) increases water use efficiency in dry conditions. Field Crops Research, 2019, 240: 168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.002
[23] 李燕青, 孙文彦, 许建新, 马卫萍, 曹卫东, 尹红娟, 李志杰. 黄淮海地区绿肥与化肥配施对棉花生长和肥料利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(6): 1397-1403.
LI Y Q, SUN W Y, XU J X, MA W P, CAO W D, YIN H J, LI Z J. Influence of combined application of green manure and inorganic fertilizers on cotton growth and fertilizer use efficiency in Huanghuaihai Area. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(6): 1397-1403. (in Chinese)
[24] 包兴国, 杨文玉, 曹卫东, 王婷, 刘兴春. 豆科与禾本科绿肥饲草作物混播增肥及改土效果研究. 中国草地学报, 2012, 34(1): 43-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5021.2012.01.008.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5021.2012.01.008
BAO X G, YANG W Y, CAO W D, WANG T, LIU X C. Soil fertility improvement by mixed planting of leguminous and gramineous green manure crops. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2012, 34(1): 43-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5021.2012.01.008. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5021.2012.01.008
[25] 韩梅, 胥婷婷, 曹卫东. 青海高原长期复种绿肥毛叶苕子对土壤供氮能力的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(6): 104-109. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.06.16.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.06.16
HAN M, XU T T, CAO W D. Effects of long-term green manurehairy vetch on soil nitrogen supply on the Qinghai Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(6): 104-109. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.06.16. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.06.16
[26] 苟志文, 殷文, 徐龙龙, 何小七, 王琦明, 柴强. 绿洲灌区复种豆科绿肥条件下小麦稳产的减氮潜力. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2195-2203. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20379.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20379
GOU Z W, YIN W, XU L L, HE X Q, WANG Q M, CHAI Q. Potential of nitrogen reduction for maintaining wheat grain yield under multiple cropping with leguminous green manure in irrigated oasis. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2195-2203. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20379. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20379
[27] 卢秉林, 包兴国, 张久东, 杨新强, 杨文玉, 李全福, 曹卫东. 间作绿肥饲草与减施氮肥对河西绿洲灌区玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(2): 170-175. doi: 10.16302/j.cnki.1000-7601.2015.02.028.
doi: 10.16302/j.cnki.1000-7601.2015.02.028
LU B L, BAO X G, ZHANG J D, YANG X Q, YANG W Y, LI Q F, CAO W D. Effects of intercropping green manure forages and nitrogen-reduction on corn yield and soil fertility in Hexi Oasis Irrigation. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(2): 170-175. doi: 10.16302/j.cnki.1000-7601.2015.02.028. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16302/j.cnki.1000-7601.2015.02.028
[28] 周罕觅, 张富仓, Roger Kjelgren, 吴立峰, 范军亮, 向友珍. 水肥耦合对苹果幼树产量、品质和水肥利用的效应. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(12): 173-183. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.024.
doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.024
ZHOU H M, ZHANG F C, KJELGREN R, WU L F, FAN J L, XIANG Y Z. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield, fruit quality and water and fertilizer use efficiency of young apple tree. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(12): 173-183. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.024. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.024
[29] 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2008.05.018.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2008.05.018
ZHANG F S, WANG J Q, ZHANG W F, CUI Z L, MA W Q, CHEN X P, JIANG R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2008.05.018. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2008.05.018
[30] 彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 杨建昌, 王光火, 邹应斌, 张福锁, 朱庆森, Roland Buresh, Christian Witt. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(9): 1095-1103. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.09.012.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.09.012
PENG S B, HUANG J L, ZHONG X H, YANG J C, WANG G H, ZOU Y B, ZHANG F S, ZHU Q S, BURESH R, WITT C. Research strategy in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(9): 1095-1103. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.09.012. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.09.012
[31] RUSINAMHODZI L, CORBEELS M, NYAMANGARA J, GILLER K E. Maize-grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crops Research, 2012, 136: 12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.07.014.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.07.014
[32] LI L, LI S M, SUN J H, ZHOU L L, BAO X G, ZHANG H G, ZHANG F S. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104(27): 11192-11196. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704591104.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704591104
[33] 邢会琴, 肖占文, 闫吉智, 马建仓, 孟嫣. 玉米连作对土壤微生物和土壤主要养分的影响. 草业科学, 2011, 28(10): 1777-1780.
XING H Q, XIAO Z W, YAN J Z, MA J C, MENG Y. Effects of continuous cropping of maize on soil microbes and main soil nutrients. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(10): 1777-1780. (in Chinese)
[34] 王劲松, 樊芳芳, 郭珺, 武爱莲, 董二伟, 白文斌, 焦晓燕. 不同作物轮作对连作高粱生长及其根际土壤环境的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(7): 2283-2291. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.036.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.036
WANG J S, FAN F F, GUO J, WU A L, DONG E W, BAI W B, JIAO X Y. Effects of different crop rotations on growth of continuous cropping sorghum and its rhizosphere soil micro-environment. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(7): 2283-2291. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.036. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.036
[35] SALMERÓN M, CAVERO J, QUÍLEZ D, ISLA R. Winter cover crops affect monoculture maize yield and nitrogen leaching under irrigated Mediterranean conditions. Agronomy Journal, 2010, 102(6): 1700-1709. doi: 10.2134/agronj2010.0180.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2010.0180
[36] 赵建华, 孙建好, 李隆, 李伟绮. 改变玉米行距种植对豌豆/玉米间作体系产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(11): 1451-1456. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.01451.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.01451
ZHAO J H, SUN J H, LI L, LI W Q. Effect of maize row spacing on yield of pea/maize intercropping system. Chinese Journal of Eco- Agriculture, 2012, 20(11): 1451-1456. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.01451. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.01451
[37] 张久东, 包兴国, 曹卫东, 车宗贤, 卢秉林, 杨新强. 河西灌区小麦与豆科作物间作和复种模式研究. 核农学报, 2015, 29(4): 786-791. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.04.0786.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.04.0786
ZHANG J D, BAO X G, CAO W D, CHE Z X, LU B L, YANG X Q. Study on planting patterns about wheat inter-cropping and multiple croppingof leguminous crops in Gansu Hexi oasis irrigation area. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(4): 786-791. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.04.0786. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.04.0786
[38] 赵财, 柴强, 乔寅英, 王建康. 禾豆间距对间作豌豆“氮阻遏”减缓效应的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(9): 1169-1176. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.160289.
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.160289
ZHAO C, CHAI Q, QIAO Y Y, WANG J K. Effect of cereal-legume spacing in intercropping system on alleviating “N inhibition” in pea plants. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(9): 1169-1176. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.160289. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.160289
[39] 姚致远, 王峥, 李婧, 鱼昌为, 曹群虎, 曹卫东, 高亚军. 轮作及绿肥不同利用方式对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2329-2336. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150610.005.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150610.005
YAO Z Y, WANG Z, LI J, YU C W, CAO Q H, CAO W D, GAO Y J. Effects of rotations and different green manure utilizations on crop yield and soil fertility. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(8): 2329-2336. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150610.005. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150610.005
[40] PEOPLES M B, BROCKWELL J, HERRIDGE D F, ROCHESTER I J, ALVES B J R, URQUIAGA S, BODDEY R M, DAKORA F D, BHATTARAI S, MASKEY S L, SAMPET C, RERKASEM B, KHAN D F, HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H, JENSEN E S. The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems. Symbiosis, 2009, 48(1/2/3): 1-17. doi: 10.1007/BF03179980.
doi: 10.1007/BF03179980
[41] ROCHESTER I J, PEOPLES M B, HULUGALLE N R, GAULT R R, CONSTABLE G A. Using legumes to enhance nitrogen fertility and improve soil condition in cotton cropping systems. Field Crops Research, 2001, 70(1): 27-41. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00151-9.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00151-9
[42] ARCAND M M, KNIGHT J D, FARRELL R E. Estimating belowground nitrogen inputs of pea and canola and their contribution to soil inorganic N pools using ^15N labeling. Plant and Soil, 2013, 371(1/2): 67-80. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1626-z.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1626-z
[43] ARCAND M M, LEMKE R, FARRELL R E, KNIGHT J D. Nitrogen supply from belowground residues of lentil and wheat to a subsequent wheat crop. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2014, 50(3): 507-515. doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0873-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0873-8
[44] MAYER J, BUEGGER F, JENSEN E S, SCHLOTER M, HEß J. Estimating N rhizodeposition of grain legumes using a 15N in situ stem labelling method. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003, 35(1): 21-28. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00212-2.
doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00212-2
[45] CAMPBELL C A, ZENTNER R P, BASNYAT P, DE JONG R, LEMKE R, DESJARDINS R. Nitrogen mineralization under summer fallow and continuous wheat in the semiarid Canadian prairie. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 2008, 88(5): 681-696. doi: 10.4141/cjss07115.
doi: 10.4141/cjss07115
[46] 何翠翠, 李贵春, 尹昌斌, 张洋. 有机肥氮投入比例对土壤微生物碳源利用特征的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(2): 383-393. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17179.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17179
HE C C, LI G C, YIN C B, ZHANG Y. Effect of manure N input ratios on the utilization of different soil microbial carbon sources. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(2): 383-393. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17179. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17179
[1] PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2# and Changbai7# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2] WANG YaFei, YAN Peng, XUE JinTao, DONG XueRui, MENG FanQi, GUO LiNa, LUO Yi, ZHANG Juan, DONG ZhiQiang, LU Lin. Effects of Ethephon-Glycine Betaine-Salicylic Acid Mixture on Root System Architecture, Physiological Function and Yield of Maize Under Heat Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1439-1455.
[3] WANG YuPing, FU Zhi, SUN JiaYing, MU XiaoMeng, LIU HuiLin, GUO JinYun, SONG WenJing, HOU LeiPing, ZHAO HaiLiang. Evaluation of the Mitigating Effect and Application Efficacy of Melatonin Applied at the Seedling Stage on Short-Term Chilling Stress in Tomato Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[4] WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[5] ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[6] HE JiHang, ZHANG Qing, LÜ XiangYue, XUE JiQuan, XU ShuTu, LIU JianChao. Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Stay-Green Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[7] LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[8] LI SiYuan, LI HongPing, CHANG HongQing, ZHANG SenYan, LI SiJia, CUI XinFei, QIAO Po, ZENG Bo, LIU GuiZhen, LIU TianXue, TANG JiHua, LI ChaoHai. Effects of Density Increase on Dynamic Change of Yield and Agronomic Traits of Maize Cultivars with Different Plant Heights [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 967-984.
[9] DONG JinLong, ZHAO Ying, YU HaiBing, LÜ JianYe, QIN JiaQi, LIANG Chen, MING Bo, LI ShaoKun. Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[10] HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[11] GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[12] YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[13] YANG Rui, CHEN JingDong, HUANG Ying, XIE LingLi, ZHANG XueKun, ZHOU DengWen, LIU QingYun, XU JinSong, XU BenBo. Genetic Improvement and Configuration Analysis of High-Yield Rapeseed Lines in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 250-264.
[14] CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[15] CAI TingYang, ZHU YuPeng, LI RuiDong, WU ZongSheng, XU YiFan, SONG WenWen, XU CaiLong, WU CunXiang. Effects of Leaf-Cutting at Seedling Stage on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Pod Distribution and Yield Formation in Soybean in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!